Skip to main content
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine logoLink to Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
. 2022 Nov 3;9:989574. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.989574

Fibroblast growth factor-23 and the risk of cardiovascular diseases and mortality in the general population: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

Menglu Liu 1,, Panpan Xia 2,, Ziqi Tan 2, Tiangang Song 2, Kaibo Mei 3, Jingfeng Wang 4, Jianyong Ma 5, Yuan Jiang 4, Jing Zhang 6, Yujie Zhao 1,*, Peng Yu 2,*, Xiao Liu 4,*
PMCID: PMC9669381  PMID: 36407457

Abstract

Background

In the past decade, fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) has been recognized as an important biomarker of cardiovascular diseases. This study aimed to assess the relationship between FGF23 and the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in general populations.

Methods

The protocol was registered prospectively in PROSPERO (CRD42021281837) and two authors independently searched for relevant studies in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The random effects model was applied.

Results

In total, 29 prospective studies involving 135,576 participants were included. In the general population, the category analysis revealed that elevated FGF23 levels were related to increased risks of myocardial infarction (MI) (RR: 1.40, 95%CI: 1.03−1.89), stroke (RR: 1.20, 95%CI: 1.02−1.43), heart failure (HF) (RR: 1.37, 95%CI: 1.23−1.52), CVD events (RR: 1.22, 95%CI: 0.99−1.51), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 1.46, 95%CI: 1.29−1.65), and all-cause mortality (RR: 1.50, 95%CI: 1.29−1.74). In the continuous analysis, per doubling of FGF23 was associated with increased risks of MI (RR: 1.08, 95%CI: 0.94−1.25), stroke (RR: 1.21, 95%CI: 0.99−1.48), HF (RR: 1.24, 95%CI: 1.14−1.35), CVD events (RR: 1.12, 95%CI: 0.99−1.27), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 1.43, 95%CI: 1.09−1.88), all-cause mortality (RR: 1.37, 95%CI: 1.15−1.62). Furthermore, the dose-response analysis demonstrated a potentially non-linear relationship between FGF23 and stroke, HF, and all-cause mortality. In contrast, a potentially linear relationship between FGF23 and cardiovascular mortality was observed (p for non-linearity = 0.73).

Conclusion

The present study suggests that increased serum FGF23 levels are positively related to CVD events and mortality in the general population. The clinical application of FGF23 levels to predict CVD risk requires further research.

Keywords: FGF23, cardiovascular diseases, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, mortality, meta-analysis

Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide, resulting in 17.3 million deaths each year. The number of annual deaths is expected to exceed 23.6 million by 2030. Meanwhile, cardiovascular diseases are responsible for approximately 40% of deaths in the Chinese population (1, 2). Therefore, it is essential to explore the prevention and treatment of CVDs and develop effective solutions.

Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) is a phosphaturic hormone primarily secreted by osteocytes and osteoblasts. It participates in adjusting systemic phosphate homeostasis, vitamin D metabolism, and a-Klotho expression through the bone-kidney axis (3, 4). FGF23 mainly exerts physiological effects in the kidneys and the parathyroid gland by binding to the FGF receptor (FGFR) and its co-receptor klotho (5). The main physiological role of FGF23 is to enhance urinary phosphate excretion, decrease the 1,25-dihydroxy Vitamin D levels in vivo, and suppress the secretion of parathyroid hormone (PTH) (6, 7). In the past decade, FGF23 has been recognized as an important biomarker of cardiovascular diseases. Furthermore, CVD is also the leading cause of death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The serum FGF23 levels in CKD patients were significantly higher than in healthy populations and demonstrated an increase with decreasing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (8, 9). Previous meta-analyses have investigated the relationship between FGF23 and CVDs in CKD patients (1013), but the association and dose-response in the general population remain unclear. Therefore, this systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis explored of the association between FGF23 levels and cardiovascular diseases and mortality risk in the general population.

Methods

This review strictly followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and G-Dose checklists guidelines (Supplementary Tables 1, 2). The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021281837).

Literature search

Two authors (PX and ML) performed a literature search using the PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases, including articles published before 10 September 2022. Medical subject headings were combined with free-text terms for retrieval without language restrictions. The search conditions were as follows: “fibroblast growth-factor 23 OR FGF23 protein OR fibroblast growth factor 23 OR FGF23 protein OR phosphatonin OR tumor-derived hypophosphatemia inducing factor” And “cardiovascular diseases OR cardiovascular disease OR disease, cardiovascular OR diseases, cardiovascular OR myocardial infarction OR stroke OR heart failure OR atrial fibrillation OR coronary heart disease OR left ventricular hypertrophy OR hypertension.” The details of the search strategy are described in Supplementary Table 3.

Study selection

According to the PICOS (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study design) strategy, the inclusion criteria for this review were as follows:

(1) The participants were adults from the general population (age > 18 years).

(2) The studies compared high vs. low FGF23 levels.

(3) The outcomes included all kinds of cardiovascular diseases (including myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, hypertension, composite of cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality).

(4) Prospective cohort studies were included.

Adjusted relative risk (RR) or hazard ratio (HR), and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were required. Prospective case-cohorts were regarded as prospective cohort studies (14). Case-control or cross-sectional study, reviews, case reports, abstracts, letters or comments, and animal research were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the included studies (15), and studies with moderate-to-high risk of bias were included (score > 6). The reasons for study exclusion are detailed in Supplementary Table 4.

Data extraction

Two authors (PX and ML) independently recorded the following information for each related study: first author, country, publication year, study design, sample size, sex, mean or median age, follow-up duration, FGF23 categories, outcomes reported, FGF23 measurement, RR or HR with the 95%CI, and adjusted co-founders.

Statistical analysis

In prospective studies, HR was considered to be equivalent to RR. The adjusted RR was transformed to the natural logarithms (logRR) to fit a normal distribution, and the standard errors (SElog [RR]) were calculated according to the corresponding 95%CIs. The random effects model was applied to pool the risk estimates considering the heterogeneity of different cohort studies. When an included study compared the lowest level or the reference category of FGF23 with the higher categories (≥2 categories), the highest category was regarded as the high level, while the reference level or the lowest level was regarded as the low level. For the category analysis, the summary RRs and 95%CIs were calculated by comparing the highest level of FGF23 to the lowest level of FGF23. For the dose-response analysis, the method described by Greenland and Longnecker (16) was used, with linear trends per 20 RU/mL increment of FGF23. The study-specific slopes and 95%CIs for FGF23 were calculated from the natural logs of the RRs and CIs. The FGF23 results were converted into RU/mL for all the included studies (1 RU/mL is approximately equivalent to 2 pg/mL) (17). FGF23 was also unified as a continuous variable into log base 2 transformations, interpreted as “per doubling” to calculate the corresponding summary RRs and 95%CIs. For the non-linear analysis, the robust error meta-regression method (REMR) developed by Xu and Doi (18, 19) was applied. The method requires data on the levels of FGF23 doses and RRs with variance estimates for at least two quantitative dose categories. If the levels of FGF23 doses was not directly reported, the mean or median of each FGF23 level between the upper and lower boundaries in each category was used to estimate the corresponding dose for each study. For open terminal categories, the open interval was set to the same length as that of the adjacent interval (20, 21).

The presence of heterogeneity between studies was estimated using the Cochrane Q test and the I2 statistic. For the Q statistic, P < 0.1 indicated significant heterogeneity. For the I2 statistic, <25% indicated low or no heterogeneity; 25%−50% suggested moderate heterogeneity; >50% was considered high heterogeneity (22). For those outcomes which a number of included studies over 6, pre-defined subgroups were stratified by age (≤60 years vs. >60 years), follow-up duration (≤10 years vs. >10 years), FGF23 measurement (iFGF23 vs. cFGF23). All statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration 2014; Nordic Cochrane Center Copenhagen, Denmark) and STATA (Version 16.0, Stata Corp., LP, College Station, TX, United States) software. All P-values were two-sided, and P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Study search and selection

We initially identified 3900 (PubMed = 798, EMBASE = 2958, Cochrane Library = 144) articles from the electronic literature search. After removing irrelevant and duplicate articles, a full-text review was performed for the remaining 87 potentially relevant studies. Ultimately, 29 articles were identified for the meta-analysis. The reasons for exclusion (n = 58) are detailed in Supplementary Table 3 and the details of the study selection are listed in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Flowchart of the study selection investigating the association between levels of FGF23 and risk of CVDs in the general population.

Study characteristics and quality

The baseline characteristics of the included studies are summarized in Table 1. Among the included studies, 23 studies reported associations between FGF23 and CVD risk in the general population: [myocardial infarction (MI) = 4, stroke = 6, heart failure (HF) = 10, CVD events = 6, sudden cardiac death (SCD) and Non-SCD = 1, atrial fibrillation (AF) = 2, hypertension = 3, coronary heart disease (CHD) = 3, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) = 1]. Furthermore, 11 studies investigated the association between FGF23 and all-cause mortality, and 8 studies assessed the association between FGF23 and cardiovascular mortality. In total, 18 studies presented the C-terminal FGF23 levels, and 14 studies reported intact-FGF23 levels. The sample sizes ranged from 727 to 22,127, with a total of 135,576 participants included. The duration of follow-up ranged from 1.75 years to 18.6 years. The included studies were of moderate-high quality, with NOS scores of 6 or higher (Supplementary Table 5).

TABLE 1.

Basic characteristics of the articles included in this systematic review and meta-analysis of FGF23 and the risk of cardiovascular diseases and mortality in the general population.

Author, year, Country Study acronym Study design Number of patients Follow-up
time
Baseline
demographics
Type of FGF-23 Outcomes
reported
RR/OR(95%CI);
comparison
Measurement
of FGF23
Adjustment for covariates
Di Giuseppe, 2015, Germany (23) EPIC-Germany Prospective Case-cohort 2908 Mean: 8.2 yr Age: 52 C-terminal Myocardial infarction 1.62(1.07-2.45);Q4vsQ1 ELISA age, sex, laboratory batch, smoking, eGFR, PTH, 25(OH)D3, dietary
Men:50% 1.27(1.05-1.53);log/unit (immutopics) calcium, phosphorus intake, prevalent hypertension,
Stroke 1.3(0.95-1.86);Q4vsQ1 hyperlipidemia,
1.13(0.96-1.31);log/unit diabetes.
CVD events 1.36(1.02-1.82);Q4vsQ1
1.16(1.02-1.32);log/unit
Ärnlöv, 2013,Uppsala, Sweden (36) PIVUS Prospective cohort 1003 Median: 5.1 yr Age: 70 yr Intact CVD events 1.68(0.97-2.9);Q4vsQ1 ELISA age, sex, eGFR, PTH, vitaminD, calcium, phosphate, markers of
Men:50% (kainos) cardiovascular pathology.
Ärnlöv, 2012, Uppsala, Sweden (46) ULSAM Prospective cohort 727 Median: 9.7 year Age: 78 yr Intact All-cause mortality 1.37(0.85-2.16);Q5vsQ1 ELISA Age, established cardiovascular risk factors, GFR, secondary models, LVH,
Men:100% Cardiovascular mortality 1.56(0.76-3.18);Q5vsQ1 (kainos) albuminuria, markers of inflammation, antioxidative stress.
Brandenburg, 2014, Germany (47) LURIC Prospective cohort 2974 Median: 9.9 year Age: 63 yr C-terminal All-cause mortality 1.72(1.38-2.14);Q4vsQ1 ELISA
(immutopics)
Age, gender, coronary artery disease, BMI, Type 2 diabetes, hypertension, smoking
Men:69% Cardiovascular mortality 1.57(1.19-2.07);Q4vsQ1 status, GFR, use of lipidlowering drugs, LDL-C, HDL-C,
1.35(1.2-1.52);
FGF23/SD(28.18RU/ml)
triglycerides, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, calcium, PTH, 25-hydroxyvitamin D.
Di Giuseppe, 2014, Germany (32) EPIC-Potsdam Prospective Case-cohort 1443 Mean: 8 yr Age: 52 C-terminal Heart failure 1.89(1.03-3.46);Q5vsQ1 ELISA
(immutopics)
sex, fasting status, waist circumference, BMI, alcohol
Men:44% 1.29(1.07-1.56);log/unit consumption, sports activity, smoking status, educational level, prevalent hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, CHD, PTH, 25(OH)D3, eGFR, stratified by baseline age.
Ix, 2012, USA (24) CHS Prospective cohort 3107 Median: 10.5 yr Age: 78 yr C-terminal Myocardial infarction 1.19(0.77-1.83);Q4vsQ1 ELISA
(immutopics)
age, sex, race, health status, current smoking, prior stroke,
Men:40% 0.97(0.8-1.18);log/unit prior MI, prior HF, prior
Stroke 1.05(0.68-1.61);Q4vsQ1 claudication, hypertension,
0.99(0.81-1.2);log/unit diabetes, BMI, estrogen use
Heart failure 1.37(0.99-1.89);Q4vsQ1 (women), total chol, lipid med use, natural log (CRP).
1.17(1.02-1.33);log/unit
CVD events 1.07(0.79-1.45);Q4vsQ1
0.99(0.87-1.13);log/unit
All-cause mortality 1.29(1.05-1.59);Q4vsQ1
1.07(0.98-1.17);log/unit
Cardiovascular mortality 1.28(0.89-1.84);Q4vsQ1
1.05(0.89-1.23);log/unit
Kestenbaum, 2014,
USA (27)
MESA Prospective cohort 6547 Median: 8.5 yr Age: 62 yr Intact Stroke 1(0.61-1.65);Q4vsQ1 ELISA age, sex, study site, height, weight, diabetes, SBP, any hypertension
Men:47% Heart failure 1.72(1.06-2.8);Q4vsQ1 (kainos) medication, current smoking
1.19(1.03-1.37);FGF23/per 20pg/ml increase C-reactive protein concentration, education level, eGFR, log(urine
Coronary heart disease 1.39(1-1.92);Q4vsQ1 albumin to creatinine ratio).
Lutsey, 2014, USA (33) ARIC Prospective cohort 11638 Median: 18.6 yr Age: 57 yr Intact Heart failure 1.3(1.13-1.51);Q5vsQ1 ELISA age, sex, race, education, physical activity, smoking, BMI, prevalent
Men:43% 1.08(1.04-1.13);
FGF23/SD(16.4pg/ml)
(kainos) diabetes, SBP, HTN medication use, lipid medication use, LDL cholesterol, HDL
Cardiovascular mortality 1.28(1.04-1.57);Q5vsQ1 cholesterol, eGFR category.
1.08(1.02-1.15);FGF23/SD(16.4pg/ml)
Coronary heart disease 1.32(1.11-1.56);Q4vsQ1
Panwar, 2015,
USA (28)
REGARDS Prospective Case-cohort 1551 7yr Age: 65 yr C-terminal Stroke 1.19(0.78-1.82);Q4vsQ1 ELISA
(immutopics)
age, race, age x race interaction, sex, SBP, diabetes, cigarette
Men:45% smoking, coronary heart disease, AF, LVH, plasma phosphorus, plasma calcium,
eGFR, natural log-transformed albumin to creatinine ratio.
Parker, 2010, San-Francisco,
USA (25)
HSS Prospective cohort 833 Median: 6.0 year Age: 67 yr C-terminal Myocardial infarction 1.05(0.85-1.3);ln/unit ELISA
(immutopics)
age, sex, race, waist-to-hip ratio, smoking, hypertension, diabetes,
Men:81% Stroke 1.5(1.11-2.04);ln/unit SBP, DBP, eGFR, total and
Heart failure 1.31(1.08-1.59);ln/unit high-density lipoprotein
CVD events 1.83(1.14-2.94);T3vsT1 cholesterol levels, C-reactive
1.24(1.06-1.44);ln/unit protein level, ejection fraction,
All-cause mortality 2.07(1.36-3.13);T3vsT1 peak exercise capacity, use of
1.4(1.22-1.6);ln/unit medicine, calcium level, phosphorus level, ucMGP, fetuin-A.
Westerberg, 2013, Sweden (50) MrOS Prospective cohort 2838 Mean: 4.5 yr Age: 75.5 yr Intact All-cause mortality 1.13(0.8-1.59);Q4vsQ1 ELISA age, BMI, eGFR, albumin, calcium, phosphate, (PTH,
Men:100% 1.02(0.89-1.17);log/SD
(0.19log pg/ml)
(kainos) FGF23 or 25D as appropriate), smoking, diabetes, hypertension,
Cardiovascular mortality 1.37(0.74-2.51);Q4vsQ1 prevalent cancer, prevalent CVD.
1.26(0.99-1.59);log/SD(0.19log pg/ml)
Wright, 2014,
USA (29)
NOMAS Prospective cohort 2525 Mean: 12 yr Age: 69 yr C-terminal Stroke 1.4(1-1.9);H2vsH1 ELISA
(immutopics)
age, sex, race/ethnicity, eGFR, SBP, DBP, medication use, fasting
Men:36% 1.3(1.1-1.6);ln/unit total cholesterol, tobacco use, moderate alcohol use, BMI, phosphate, parathyroid hormone.
Souma, 2016,
USA (49)
NOMAS Prospective cohort 2525 Mean: 14 yr Age: 69 yr C-terminal All-cause mortality 2.71(1.3-5.65);ln/unit ELISA
(immutopics)
age, sex, race/ethnicity, traditional cardiovascular disease
Men:36% Cardiovascular mortality 2.07(1.45-2.94);Q5vsQ1 risk factors (cigarette smoking, BMI, hypertension, diabetes,
1.38(1.19-1.6);ln/unit hypercholesterolemia, prevalent cardiovascular disease), eGFR, mineral metabolism markers (phosphate, PTH,
25-hydroxyvitamin D, calcium, albumin).
Almahmoud, 2018, USA (31) MESA Prospective cohort 6542 Median: 12.1 yr Age: 62 yr Intact Heart failure 1.51(1-2.3);Q4vsQ1 ELISA age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, study site, height, weight, SBP,
Men:47% 1.18(1.02-1.37);FGF23/per 20pg/ml increase (kainos) antihypertensive medications, DM, smoking, C-reactive protein, UACR, eGFR, NT-proBNP, 25(OH) vitamin D, PTH, phosphate.
De Jong, 2021, Netherlands (51) PREVEND Prospective cohort 5253 Median: 8.4 yr Age:52yr C-terminal All-cause mortality 1.99(1.33-2.98);T3vsT1 ELISA age, sex, mean arterial blood pressure, the use of
Men:47% 1.3(1.03-1.63);log/unit (Quidel) antihypertensive drugs, BMI, ethnicity, smoking status, eGFR, albuminuria, total cholesterol, history of diabetes, serum phosphate, calcium, plasma PTH, 25(OH)D, hsCRP, 24-h urinary urea excretion, serum iron, transferrin, ferritin.
Sharma, 2021,
USA (48)
HABC Prospective cohort 2763 Median:8.3 yr Age:75yr Intact All-cause mortality 1.31(1.05-1.62);Q4vsQ1 ELISA age, gender, race, site, education, diabetes, SBP, HTNmeds, BMI,
Men:45% 1.24(1.12-1.37);log/unit (kainos) smoking, prevalent CVD,
Cardiovascular mortality 1.54(1.08-2.18);Q4vsQ1 albumin, CRP, statin use, total cholesterol, calcium, phosphate,
1.31(1.11-1.54);log/unit PTH, eGFR, UACR.
Robinson-Cohen,
2020, USA (34)
MESA Prospective cohort 6413 Median:14.9yr Age:62yr Intact Heart failure 1.37(1.07-1.75);H2vsH1 ELISA age, gender, gross family income, educational attainment,
Men:47% (kainos) race/ethnicity, BMI, SBP, use of medication, low-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, diabetes status, smoking status, eGFR.
Binnenmars, 2022, Netherlands (35) PREVEND Prospective cohort 6830 Median: 7.4yr Age:54yr C-terminal Heart failure 1.36(0.93-2.00);T3vsT1 ELISA age, sex, White race, BMI, smoking, alcohol use,
Men:49.7% 1.29(1.06-1.57);log/unit (Quidel) hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes type 2, myocardial infarction, atrial
fibrillation, eGFR, urinary albumin excretion, high- sensitivity CRP, hemoglobin, ferritin, transferrin saturation, NT-proBNP.
Paul, 2021, USA (30) CARDIA Prospective cohort 3151 Median: 7.6yr Age:45yr C-terminal & Intact CVD events 0.99(0.61-1.6);Q4vsQ1 & ELISA age, sex, race, educational attainment, smoking status,
Men:44% 0.71(0.45-1.13);Q4vsQ1 (Quidel) physical activity, BMI, diabetes
1.14(0.97-1.34);log/unit & mellitus, SBP, antihypertensive
0.82(0.62-1.08);log/unit drug use, total cholesterol,
Stroke 1.15(0.5-2.62);Q4vsQ1 & HDL-C, statin use, eGFR, UACR.
0.47(0.21-1.02);Q4vsQ1
1.18(0.95-1.47);log/unit &
0.58(0.34-0.97);log/unit
Heart failure 2.66(0.89-7.95);Q4vsQ1 &
0.74(0.27-2.04);Q4vsQ1
1.52(1.18-1.96);log/unit &
0.86(0.5-1.49);log/unit
All-cause mortality 1.27(0.79-2.06);Q4vsQ1 &
0.55(0.33-0.92);Q4vsQ1
1.17(1-1.38);log/unit &
0.86(0.64-1.17);log/unit
Haring, 2016, USA (37) FHS Prospective cohort 3236 Median:10.8yr Age:59yr C-terminal CVD events 1.17(0.87-1.59);Q4vsQ1 ELISA
(immutopics)
age, sex, BMI, SBP, antihypertensive medication,
Men:46% 1.05(0.94-1.17);ln/SD
(0.33logRU/ml)
total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, smoking, type 2
All-cause mortality 1.87(1.38-2.53);Q4vsQ1 diabetes mellitus, cohort.
1.31(1.2-1.42);ln/SD
(0.33logRU/ml)
Cardiovascular mortality 1.41(0.78-2.55);Q4vsQ1
1.32(1.09-1.59);ln/SD
(0.33logRU/ml)
Sharma, 2020, USA (26) CHS Prospective Case-cohort 844 10yr Age:78yr Intact & Myocardial infarction 0.99(0.75-1.31);log/unit ELISA ferritin, Transferrin Saturation, CRP, UACR, eGFR
Men:38% C-terminal Heart failure 1.19(0.95-1.50);log/unit (kainos) &
All-cause mortality 1.11(0.97-1.28);log/unit ELISA
(immutopics)
Deo, 2015, USA (45) CHS Prospective cohort 3244 Median:8.1yr Age:78yr C-terminal Sudden cardiac death 1.01(0.69-1.48);log/unit ELISA
(immutopics)
age, sex, race, diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart
Men:40% Non-sudden
cardiac death
1.02(0.85-1.22);log/unit failure, myocardial infarction, smoking, and alcohol use, eGFR, natural log(ACR).
Mathew, 2014,
USA (38)
MESA & CHS Prospective cohort 6398 & 1350 Median:7.7yr
& 8yr
Age:62yr Intact & Atrial fibrillation 1.38(0.94- 2.04);Q4vsQ1 ELISA age, gender, race/ethnicity, study site, attained education, low
Men:46.5% C-terminal & (kainos) & density cholesterol, use of
& 1.52(1-2.32);Q4vsQ1 ELISA
(immutopics)
lipid-lowering medications, current smoking, diabetes,
Age:77yr physical activity, height, height
Men: 29% squared, weight, UACR, eGFR, SBP, and use of hypertension medication, the serum concentrations of calcium, phosphate, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, PTH.
Alonso, 2014,
USA (39)
ARIC Prospective cohort 12349 Mean:17yr Age:57yr Intact Atrial fibrillation 1.1(0.95-1.27);Q4vsQ1 ELISA age, race, sex, study site, BMI, smoking, education, height,
Men:43% (kainos) diabetes, SBP, DBP, use of antihypertensive medication, prevalent coronary heart disease, prevalent heart failure, ECG-based left ventricular hypertrophy, NT-proBNP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, eGFR, serum calcium, phosphorus, PTH, 25-hydroxyvitamin D.
Akhabue, 2018,
USA (40)
CARDIA Prospective cohort 1758 5yr Age:62yr C-terminal Hypertension 1.45(1.18- 1.77);Q4vsQ1 ELISA
(immutopics)
age, sex, race, education, study center, BMI, smoking status,
Men:46.5% physical activity, Triglyceride/high density lipoprotein ratio, eGFR, UACR.
Fyfe-Johnson, 2016, USA (41) ARIC Prospective cohort 7948 Median: 5.9yr Age:62yr Intact Hypertension 1.21(1.08- 1.35);D10vsQ1 ELISA age, race, sex, ARIC field center, educational attainment, cigarette
Men:46.5% (kainos) smoking, alcohol intake,
physical activity, BMI, serum phosphorus, eGFR category.
Drew,2020,
USA (42)
HABC Prospective cohort 2496 10yr Age:75yr Intact Hypertension 1.69(1.31- 2.18);Q4vsQ1 ELISA age, sex, race, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, eGFR,
Men:49% (kainos) UACR, BMI, smoking, calcium, phosphorus, 25(OH) Vitamin D, PTH.
panwar, 2018,
USA (43)
REGARDS Prospective Case-cohort 22127 4yr Age:64yr C-terminal Coronary heart disease 2.15(1.35-3.42);Q4vsQ1 ELISA
(immutopics)
race, age, sex, BMI, SBP level, DBP level, diabetes, physical
Men:41% activity, income, education, neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics, cigarette smoking,
LVH, use of medications, eGFR, natural log–transformed albumin to creatinine ratio, natural log–transformed CRP level, intact parathyroid hormone concentration, triglyceride level, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, total cholesterol level.
Jovanovich, 2013, USA (44) CHS Prospective cohort 2255 3yr Age:62yr C-terminal Left ventricular hypertrophy 1.5(0.91- 2.64);Q4vsQ1 ELISA
(immutopics)
age, sex, race, clinic site, weight, smoking status, diabetes, use of
Men:46.5% antihypertensive medications, SBP, CRP.

NR, not reported; ELISA, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CRP, C-reactive protein; UACR, urine albumin creatine ratio; HbA1c, Glycosylated Hemoglobin; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NT-proBNP, N-terminal of the prohormone B-type natriuretic peptide; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; PTH, parathyroid hormone; GDF-15, growth differentiation factor 15; EPIC, European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition; AF, atrial fibrillation; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CVD, cardiovascular diseases; DM, diabetes mellitus; EPIC, European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC); PIVUS, Prospective Investigation of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors study; ULSAM, Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men; CHS, Cardiovascular Health Study; MESA, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis; ARIC, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study; REGARDS, Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke; HSS, Heart and Soul Study; FHS, Framingham Heart Study; NOMAS, Stroke-free North Manhattan Study; MrOS, multicenter prospective Osteoporotic Fractures in Men study; CRIC, Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort; HOST, Homocysteine in Kidney and End Stage Renal Disease study; HEMO, Hemodialysis Study; EVOLVE, Evaluation of Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events; LURIC, Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health study; PREVEND, Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease study; CARDIA, Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study; HABC, Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study.

Association between fibroblast growth factor-23 and risk of cardiovascular diseases

Four studies (2326) reported the relationship between FGF23 and MI in the general population. The categorical analysis revealed that high FGF23 levels were related to increased risk of MI (RR: 1.40, 95%CI:1.03−1.89, p = 0.03; Figure 2A), with low heterogeneity (p = 0.31, I2 = 2%). Four studies reported continuous analysis (2326); the RR of MI per doubling of FGF23 was 1.08 (95%CI: 0.94−1.25, p = 0.28; Figure 2B), with moderate heterogeneity (p = 0.22, I2 = 33%).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Forest plot for the association between FGF23 level and the risk of MI (A), stroke (C), HF (E), and CVD events (G) in the general population, analyzed as category variable, highest vs. lowest; the association between per doubling of FGF23 increment and the risk of MI (B), stroke (D), HF (F), and CVD events (H) in the general population, analyzed as a continuous variable.

Six studies analyzed the relationship between FGF23 levels and stroke (23, 24, 2730). High FGF23 levels were related to increased risk of stroke in the categorical analysis (RR: 1.20, 95%CI: 1.02−1.43, p = 0.03; Figure 2C), without heterogeneity (p = 0.66, I2 = 0%). In the continuous analysis, the RR of stroke per doubling of FGF23 was 1.21 (95%CI: 0.99−1.48, p = 0.06; Figure 2D), with high heterogeneity (p = 0.02, I2 = 63%). Moreover, six studies performed a dose-response analysis (23, 24, 2730), revealing a non-linear association between FGF23 and stroke (p for non-linearity = 0.10; Figure 3A).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

The dose-response relationship between FGF23 levels and the risk of stroke (A), HF (B), cardiovascular mortality (C), and all-cause mortality (D) in the general population. FGF23 levels were converted to RU/ml and the results were pooled in a one-stage random-effects model. The bold lines indicate the pooled restricted cubic spline model and the black dashed line indicates the 95% CIs of the pooled curve.

Ten studies (2427, 3035) reported the association between FGF23 levels and HF in general populations. A significant increase in HF risk was associated with high FGF23 levels (RR: 1.37, 95%CI: 1.23−1.52, p < 0.00001; Figure 2E), without heterogeneity (p = 0.92, I2 = 0%). In the continuous analysis, the summary RR for a 20 RU/ml increment of FGF23 was 1.25 (95%CI: 1.14−1.37, p < 0.00001; Supplementary Figure 1A), without heterogeneity (p = 0.47, I2 = 0%); and the RR of HF per doubling of FGF23 was 1.24 (95%CI: 1.14−1.35, p < 0.00001; Figure 2F), without heterogeneity (p = 0.76, I2 = 0%). In addition, eight studies carried out a dose-response analysis (24, 27, 3035), and a potentially non-linear association of FGF23 was observed with HF (p for non-linearity = 0.001; Figure 3B).

Additionally, six studies (2325, 30, 36, 37) considered the composite of MI, stroke, heart failure, and so on as CVD events, assessing FGF23 levels and CVD events in general populations. High FGF23 levels were related to an increased risk of CVD events (RR: 1.22, 95%CI: 0.99−1.51, p = 0.06; Figure 2G), with high heterogeneity (p = 0.06, I2 = 52%). In the continuous analysis, the RR of CVD per doubling of FGF23 was 1.12 (95%CI: 0.99−1.27, p = 0.07; Figure 2H), with moderate heterogeneity (p = 0.12, I2 = 45%).

A few studies examined the relationship between FGF23 and other cardiovascular diseases, but the results were not pooled due to the scarcity of data. As shown in Table 1, two studies (38, 39) reported the relationship between FGF23 levels and atrial fibrillation, including 2,092 cases out of 20,097 participants. Mathew et al. (38) described the association between FGF23 and AF incidence in The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) including 291 MESA patients (HR [quartile 4 vs. quartile 1]: 1.38) and 229 CHS patients (HR [quartile 4 vs. quartile 1]: 1.52) adjusted for potential confounding characteristics. However, Alonso et al. (39) revealed that baseline FGF23 levels were not associated with AF risk, regardless of kidney function. This study summarized data from 1,572 patients (HR [quartile 4 vs. quartile 1]:1.1) adjusted for potential confounding factors. Moreover, three studies (4042) investigated the relationship between FGF23 levels and hypertension. The study from Akhabue et al. (40) included 618 patients and showed that elevated FGF23 levels were related to an increased risk of hypertension in fully adjusted models (RR [quartile 4 vs. quartile 1]: 1.45). In another cohort study, Fyfe-Johnson et al. (41) demonstrated that the HR for hypertension was 1.21 for decile 10 compared to quintile 1 after adjusting for demographics, behaviors, and adiposity. Drew et al. (42) reported that FGF23 was related to an increased hypertension risk after adjustments, including 576 patients (RR [quartile 4 vs. quartile 1]: 1.69).

Three studies (27, 33, 43) reported the relationship between FGF23 levels and the risk of CHD, including 2,317 cases. Panwar et al. (28) evaluated 829 patients adjusted for established CHD risk factors and kidney function, suggesting that elevated FGF23 concentrations were related to an increased CHD risk (HR [quartile 4 vs. quartile 1]: 2.15). In addition, Kestenbaum et al. (27) revealed that elevated FGF23 concentrations were related to an increased CHD risk, including 363 patients (RR [quartile 4 vs. quartile 1]: 1.39) after adjustments. Another cohort study involving 1125 patients with CHD reported similar results after adjustments (RR: 1.32).

Jovanovich et al. (44) found that FGF23 was associated with greater risk of LVH, including 310 patients (OR [quartile 4 vs. quartile 1]: 1.5) in adjusted analyses. Deo et al. (45) investigated 570 cases among the elderly population and observed that FGF23 elevations were independently associated with non-SCD (HR [quartile 4 vs. quartile 1]: 1.02) after adjustments.

Association between fibroblast growth factor-23 and death

Eight studies (24, 33, 37, 4650) reported the association between FGF23 and cardiovascular mortality. The categorical analysis indicated that high FGF23 concentrations were related to increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR: 1.46, 95%CI: 1.29−1.65, p < 0.00001; Figure 4A), without heterogeneity (p = 0.50, I2 = 0%). In the continuous analysis, the summarized RR for a 20 RU/ml increment of FGF23 was 1.23 (95%CI: 1.15−1.32, p < 0.00001; Supplementary Figure 1B), without heterogeneity (p = 0.83, I2 = 0%); and the RR of cardiovascular mortality per doubling of FGF23 was 1.43 (95%CI: 1.09−1.88, p = 0.009; Figure 4B), with high heterogeneity (p = 0.001, I2 = 78%). Moreover, eight studies (24, 33, 37, 4650) were included in the dose-response analysis, revealing a significant linear dose-response relationship between FGF23 levels and cardiovascular mortality (p for non-linearity = 0.73; Figure 3C).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Forest plot for the association between FGF23 levels and the risk of cardiovascular mortality (A) and all-cause mortality (C) in the general population, analyzed as category variable, highest vs. lowest; the association between per doubling of FGF23 increment and the risk of cardiovascular mortality (B), and all-cause mortality (D) in the general population, analyzed as a continuous variable.

In addition, eleven studies (2426, 30, 37, 4651) evaluated the association between FGF23 and all-cause mortality in general populations. A significant increase in risk of death was associated with high FGF23 levels (RR: 1.50, 95%CI: 1.29−1.74, p < 0.00001; Figure 4C), with moderate heterogeneity (p = 0.04, I2 = 49%). The RR of all-cause mortality per doubling of FGF23 was 1.42 (95%CI: 1.37−1.15, p = 0.0003; Figure 4D), with high heterogeneity (p < 0.00001, I2 = 84%). Furthermore, nine studies were included in the dose-response analysis (24, 25, 30, 37, 4648, 50, 51), and a non-linear association of FGF23 with all-cause mortality was observed (p for non-linearity = 0.10; Figure 3D).

Moreover, the above results were confirmed by the subgroup analysis based on age (≤60 years vs. > 60 years), follow-up duration (≤10 years vs. > 10 years), and FGF23 measurement (iFGF23 vs. cGFG23) (Supplementary Figures 2, 3).

Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

Deleting individual studies in the sensitivity analysis did not significantly alter the pooled effect size (Supplementary Figure 4). The absence of publication bias was presented by using Egger’s test (p = 0.394 and 0.530) and a Funnel plot (Supplementary Figure 5).

Discussion

The present study showed a significant relationship between FGF23 levels and the risk and mortality of CVDs in the general population. The dose-response analysis suggested a potentially non-linear relationship between FGF23 and stroke, and HF and all-cause mortality. In contrast, FGF23 levels and cardiovascular mortality exhibited a potentially linear relationship. To our knowledge, this is the first dose-response meta-analysis focusing on the association between FGF23 levels and cardiovascular diseases in general populations.

The findings were confirmed with a further analysis stratified by age (≤60 years vs. >60 years), follow-up duration (≤10 years vs. >10 years) and FGF23 types (iFGF23 vs. cGFG23). The results revealed a similar relationship between FGF23 and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Notably, most subgroups in this study did not exhibit heterogeneity, and no substantial changes were observed in the pooled RR when individual studies were deleted. However, moderate heterogeneity was found in all-cause mortality (I2 = 49%), and a stratified analysis was performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. No substantial heterogeneity was detected in the intact FGF23 subgroup. The differences in variable adjustment across studies might lead to an inaccurate estimation of the effect size. Although our analysis showed moderate heterogeneity, a robust association was observed between FGF23 levels and all-cause mortality.

Gao and co-workers (10) reported that elevated FGF23 levels were related to all-cause mortality (RR: 1.25, 95%CI: 1.14−1.37) and CVDs (RR: 1.21, 95%CI: 1.13−1.39) in hemodialysis patients. These significant associations support the predictive role of FGF23 in CKD patients. Remarkably, most of the included studies had adjusted for potential confounders, including age, estimated glomerular filtration rate and other risk factors. Consequently, a significant association was observed between FGF23 levels and CVD risk and mortality. Three cohorts (24, 37, 44) did not adjust for CKD or kidney function, which were considered crucial variables in mediating the impact of FGF23 on cardiovascular disease. Nevertheless, higher FGF23 levels were still associated with CVDs and mortality after deleting the eGFR-unadjusted studies (MI RR: 1.62, 95%CI: 1.07−2.45; stroke RR: 1.24, 95%CI: 1.03−1.49; HF RR: 1.37, 95%CI: 1.23−1.53; CVD events RR: 1.32, 95%CI: 0.93−1.88; cardiovascular mortality RR: 1.50, 95%CI: 1.30−1.74; all-cause mortality RR: 1.50, 95%CI: 1.24−1.80). Collectively, our results provided compelling evidence for the close relationship of FGF23 levels with CVDs and mortality in the general population, independent of CKD status. These findings suggest that FGF23 may potentially be applied to predict the risk and mortality of CVDs, irrespective of kidney function.

Age is another vital confounding factor, and its effects on the study results should be explored as it is a well-known traditional risk factor. In most populations, the incidence of CVD increases with age. It is believed that the association between age and CVD reflects metabolic risk factors, such as elevated blood pressure, cholesterol, and diabetes (52). Moreover, two major changes with advancing age are large elastic artery stiffening and endothelial dysfunction, contributing to the development of CVD in the elderly (53). Despite adjusting for those factors, the presence of residual confounding factors such as Klotho cannot be excluded. A close association between FGF23 and klotho levels has been established. FGF23 exerts its biological effects by activating FGFRs, which are dependent on the αKlotho co-receptor. Although klotho is absent in the heart, in vivo experiments by Hu et al. (54) showed that high FGF23 concentrations induced direct cardiac toxicity in a klotho-deficient state. Serum and urinary Klotho levels are dramatically decreased during early CKD, while FGF23 levels are increased. Klotho deficiency is a pathogenic factor of CKD progression and CVD. Marcais et al. (55) suggested that evaluating FGF23 in the absence of Klotho data may overemphasize its adverse effects. Unfortunately, most studies did not consider the effect of klotho and did not conduct a separate classification analysis of klotho.

Based on the current evidence, high FGF23 levels are associated with increased risks of CVDs and mortality in the general population. Experimental data in CKD and general populations showed that FGF23 exerts direct cardiac and vascular toxicity, mediating cardiac hypertrophy, cardiac fibrosis, cardiac dysfunction, and diffuse vascular calcification by activating specific myocardial FGF receptors (FGFR) (56). Faul et al. (57) reported that injecting recombinant FGF23 into the myocardium of mice resulted in LVH, inducing a significant increase in heart weight, left ventricular wall thickness, and cross-sectional surface area of individual cardiomyocytes. Previous studies have suggested that FGF23 is associated with vascular endothelial dysfunction, arterial stiffness, and diffuse vascular calcification. In addition, the ERK1/2 signaling pathway may play an essential role in vascular calcification (58). Furthermore, FGF23 exerts indirect adverse cardiac effects, such as regulating sodium retention and excretion in the distal renal tubules, increasing the activation of the renin-angiotensin system, and the production of inflammation and oxidative stress markers (59, 60). However, the predictive effects of FGF23 remains to be demonstrated.

Comparisons with previous studies

Up to now, several meta-analyses have explored the relationship between FGF23 and CVDs (1013). The predictive value of FGF23 in CKD patients has been extensively summarized. Cheng et al. (13) concluded that high FGF23 levels were related to all-cause mortality (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.38−1.55, p < 0.001), CVD (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.15−1.63, p < 0.001) and renal events (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.07−1.59, p = 0.008) in pre-dialysis CKD patients. Marthi et al. (11) described the association between FGF23 levels and CVDs in the general population, but did not perform a dose-response analysis. Our study extends previous findings and further clarifies the potential dose-response association between FGF23 and CVD risk and mortality in the general population.

Policy implications and further research

Theoretically, FGF23 may be applied in the identification of high-risk individuals and could be a novel target to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events. Phosphate binders, FGF23 antibodies, and FGFR blockers are currently the key therapeutic options. Studies have proposed that circulating FGF23 levels are related to dietary phosphate (Pi) intake levels in healthy people. Consequently, reducing the absorption of dietary phosphate can hypothetically decrease the circulating FGF23 concentrations. Commonly used phosphorus binders include Ca2+-containing binders, aluminum-containing binders and non-Ca2+ or Ca2+-free phosphate binders. However, reducing the absorption of dietary phosphate by phosphate binders or combination therapy only results in modest decreases in FGF23 levels and yields short-lived effects. Whether this is caused by increased intestinal total phosphorus absorption or medication resistance is unclear (61).

The mechanisms regulating FGF23 synthesis are poorly understood. Blocking the main FGFR isoform FGFR4 may reduce the cardiotoxic effects of FGF23, but does not affect its physiological functions. The safety of this method in cardiovascular diseases has already been demonstrated in clinical trials. Conversely, FGF23 antibodies might cause greater side effects than clinical benefits in patients with renal dysfunction (56). Optimally, low FGF23 levels should be maintained while blocking the non-target effects, as opposed to completely depleting it (62).

Traditional biomarkers such as troponin I and T have been widely used in clinical practice for the diagnosis of MI. FGF23, as a novel candidate biomarker of cardiovascular risk, is positively correlated with classical biomarkers of cardiac damage but does not directly depend on them (56). In addition, the combination of these biomarkers has been shown to have a significantly higher predictive value for cardiovascular risk assessment than individually (56). The ankle–brachial index (ABI) can be used to predict the risk of CVD and CHD events and is inexpensive, easily accessible, and non-invasive. However, its sensitivity and specificity still need to be explored (63). The coronary artery calcium score reflects the load of coronary calcification and the degree of coronary atherosclerosis. It is measured by cardiac computer tomography and requires patients to be exposed to ionizing radiation, which is particularly unpopular among young subjects, especially women. This technique is more time-consuming and is also limited by its relatively high cost (64). In contrast, FGF23 concentrations are easily obtainable from the patients’ serum at a low cost, which could prove particularly valuable in emergency situations. Therefore, FGF23 can be used as an early and complementary predictor of adverse cardiac events.

Additionally, FGF23 may potentially predict the prognosis of cardiovascular diseases. Song et al. (65) have reported that FGF23 can independently predict the risk of in-stent restenosis in coronary heart disease patients who underwent PCI with a drug-eluting stent. Cornelissen et al. (66) showed similar accuracy in prognosis estimation between assessing FGF23 levels and the well-established Seattle Heart Failure (SHF) model in patients hospitalized for acute HF. Further understanding of the molecular mechanisms of FGF23 in the cardiovascular system will assist in developing and implementing new therapeutic strategies and prognosis estimation.

Strength and limitations

This review only included prospective studies, avoiding recall bias. Most of the included studies had a large sample size and had adjusted for potential confounding factors, such as age, gender, race, smoking, BMI, and basic disease histories. Nevertheless, the limitations of this study should be acknowledged. Firstly, our results were based on observational studies and a causal relationship cannot be confirmed. The residual confounding factors and the unmeasured factors could not be ruled out completely due to the inherent nature of observational research. Secondly, the majority of the included studies were performed in the United States or Europe, and the applicability of our findings to the Asian population requires further research. Finally, some studies may have included CKD patients in the general population, affecting the reliability of our results.

Conclusion

Overall, the increased serum FGF23 levels were associated with increased risks of CVDs and mortality in general populations. There was a potentially non-linear relationship between FGF23 and stroke, HF and all-cause mortality, whereas a potentially linear relationship between FGF23 and cardiovascular mortality was observed. Additional studies are needed to clarify the mechanism between FGF23 and CVDs in the general population. The clinical application of FGF23 levels to predict CVD risk requires further research.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

XL and PY were responsible for the entire project and revised the draft. PX, YZ, and ML performed the data extraction and statistical analysis, drafted the first version of the manuscript, and interpreted the data. All authors participated in the interpretation of the results and prepared the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (Nos. 20192ACBL21037, 202004BCJL23049, and 202002BAB21 6022 to JZ), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 82160371 to JZ, 82100869 to PY, 21866019 to JM, and 82100347 to XL), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2021M703724 to XL), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2022A1515010582 to XL), and the Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou (202102010007 to JW).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.989574/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1.Laslett LJ, Alagona P, Jr., Clark BA, III, Drozda JP, Jr., Saldivar F, Wilson SR, et al. The worldwide environment of cardiovascular disease: prevalence, diagnosis, therapy, and policy issues: a report from the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2012) 60(25 Suppl):S1–49. 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhao D, Liu J, Wang M, Zhang X, Zhou M. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in China: current features and implications. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2019) 16:203–12. 10.1038/s41569-018-0119-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Quarles LD. Role of FGF23 in vitamin D and phosphate metabolism: implications in chronic kidney disease. Exp Cell Res. (2012) 318:1040–8. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.02.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Negri AL. Fibroblast growth factor 23: associations with cardiovascular disease and mortality in chronic kidney disease. Int Urol Nephrol. (2014) 46:9–17. 10.1007/s11255-012-0370-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Musgrove J, Wolf M. Regulation and effects of FGF23 in chronic kidney disease. Annu Rev Physiol. (2020) 82:365–90. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021119-034650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wolf M. Update on fibroblast growth factor 23 in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. (2012) 82:737–47. 10.1038/ki.2012.176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wahl P, Wolf M. FGF23 in chronic kidney disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2012) 728:107–25. 10.1007/978-1-4614-0887-1_8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Isakova T, Wahl P, Vargas GS, Gutiérrez OM, Scialla J, Xie H, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 is elevated before parathyroid hormone and phosphate in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. (2011) 79:1370–8. 10.1038/ki.2011.47 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bansal N. Evolution of cardiovascular disease during the transition to end-stage renal disease. Semin Nephrol. (2017) 37:120–31. 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2016.12.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gao S, Xu J, Zhang S, Jin J. Meta-analysis of the association between fibroblast growth factor 23 and mortality and cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients. Blood Purif. (2019) 47(Suppl 1):24–30. 10.1159/000496220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Marthi A, Donovan K, Haynes R, Wheeler DC, Baigent C, Rooney CM, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-23 and risks of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2018) 29:2015–27. 10.1681/ASN.2017121334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Qin Z, Liu X, Song M, Zhou Q, Yu J, Zhou B, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 as a predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in prospective studies. Atherosclerosis. (2017) 261:1–11. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.03.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xue C, Yang B, Zhou C, Dai B, Liu Y, Mao Z, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 predicts all-cause mortality in a dose-response fashion in pre-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease. Am J Nephrol. (2017) 45:149–59. 10.1159/000454959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Umer A, Kelley GA, Cottrell LE, Giacobbi P, Jr., Innes KE, Lilly CL. Childhood obesity and adult cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. (2017) 17:683. 10.1186/s12889-017-4691-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. (2010) 25:603–5. 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Greenland S, Longnecker MP. Methods for trend estimation from summarized dose-response data, with applications to meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. (1992) 135:1301–9. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chan GC, Divers J, Russell GB, Langefeld CD, Wagenknecht LE, Hsu FC, et al. FGF23 concentration and APOL1 genotype are novel predictors of mortality in African Americans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. (2018) 41:178–86. 10.2337/dc17-0820 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xu C, Doi SAR. The robust error meta-regression method for dose-response meta-analysis. Int J Evid Based Healthc. (2018) 16:138–44. 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xu C, Thabane L, Liu T, Borhan A, Sun X. Flexible piecewise linear model for investigating dose-response relationship in meta-analysis: methodology, examples, and comparison. J Evid Based Med. (2019) 12:63–8. 10.1111/jebm.12339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu X, Guo L, Xiao K, Zhu W, Liu M, Wan R, et al. The obesity paradox for outcomes in atrial fibrillation: evidence from an exposure-effect analysis of prospective studies. Obes Rev. (2020) 21:e12970. 10.1111/obr.12970 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Xu C, Liu Y, Jia PL, Li L, Liu TZ, Cheng LL, et al. The methodological quality of dose-response meta-analyses needed substantial improvement: a cross-sectional survey and proposed recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. (2019) 107:1–11. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Larney S, Tran LT, Leung J, Santo T, Jr., Santomauro D, Hickman M, et al. All-cause and cause-specific mortality among people using extramedical opioids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. (2020) 77:493–502. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Di Giuseppe R, Kühn T, Hirche F, Buijsse B, Dierkes J, Fritsche A, et al. Plasma fibroblast growth factor 23 and risk of cardiovascular disease: results from the EPIC-Germany case-cohort study. Eur J Epidemiol. (2015) 30:131–41. 10.1007/s10654-014-9982-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ix JH, Katz R, Kestenbaum BR, De Boer IH, Chonchol M, Mukamal KJ, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-23 and death, heart failure, and cardiovascular events in community-living individuals: CHS (Cardiovascular Health Study). J Am Coll Cardiol. (2012) 60:200–7. 10.1161/circ.125.suppl_10.AP241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Parker BD, Schurgers LJ, Brandenburg VM, Christenson RH, Vermeer C, Ketteler M, et al. The associations of fibroblast growth factor 23 and uncarboxylated matrix Gla protein with mortality in coronary artery disease: the heart and soul study. Ann Internal Med. (2010) 152:640–8. 10.7326/0003-4819-152-10-201005180-00004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sharma S, Katz R, Bullen AL, Chaves PHM, De Leeuw PW, Kroon AA, et al. Intact and c-terminal FGF23 assays-do kidney function, inflammation, and low iron influence relationships with outcomes? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2020) 105:e4875–85. 10.1210/clinem/dgaa665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kestenbaum B, Sachs MC, Hoofnagle AN, Siscovick DS, Ix JH, Robinson-Cohen C, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-23 and cardiovascular disease in the general population: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Circ Heart Fail. (2014) 7:409–17. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000952 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Panwar B, Jenny NS, Howard VJ, Wadley VG, Muntner P, Kissela BM, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and risk of incident stroke in community-living adults. Stroke. (2015) 46:322–8. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wright CB, Dong C, Stark M, Silverberg S, Rundek T, Elkind MSV, et al. Plasma FGF23 and the risk of stroke: the northern manhattan study (NOMAS). Neurology. (2014) 82:1700–6. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Paul S, Wong M, Akhabue E, Mehta RC, Kramer H, Isakova T, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and incident cardiovascular disease and mortality in middle-aged adults. J Am Heart Assoc. (2021) 10:e020196. 10.1161/JAHA.120.020196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Almahmoud MF, Soliman EZ, Bertoni AG, Kestenbaum B, Katz R, Lima JAC, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-23 and heart failure with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction: MESA. J Am Heart Assoc. (2018) 7:e008334. 10.1161/JAHA.117.008334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Di Giuseppe RD, Buijsse B, Hirche F, Wirth J, Arregui M, Westphal S, et al. Plasma fibroblast growth factor 23, parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, and risk of heart failure: a prospective, case-cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2014) 99:947–55. 10.1210/jc.2013-2963 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lutsey PL, Alonso A, Selvin E, Pankow JS, Michos ED, Agarwal SK, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-23 and incident coronary heart disease, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. J Am Heart Assoc. (2014) 3:e000936. 10.1161/JAHA.114.000936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Robinson-Cohen C, Shlipak M, Sarnak M, Katz R, Peralta C, Young B, et al. Impact of race on the association of mineral metabolism with heart failure: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. (2020) 105:e1144–51. 10.1210/clinem/dgz218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Binnenmars SH, Hoogslag GE, Yeung SMH, Brouwers FP, Bakker SJL, van Gilst WH, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and risk of new onset heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction: the PREVEND Study. J Am Heart Assoc. (2022) 11:e024952. 10.1161/JAHA.121.024952 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ärnlöv J, Carlsson AC, Sundstrom J, Ingelsson E, Larsson A, Lind L, et al. Serum FGF23 and risk of cardiovascular events in relation to mineral metabolism and cardiovascular pathology. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2013) 8:781–6. 10.2215/CJN.09570912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Haring R, Enserro D, Xanthakis V, Mitchell GF, Benjamin EJ, Hamburg NM, et al. Plasma fibroblast growth factor 23: clinical correlates and association with cardiovascular disease and mortality in the framingham heart study. J Am Heart Assoc. (2016) 5:e003486. 10.1161/JAHA.116.003486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mathew JS, Sachs MC, Katz R, Patton KK, Heckbert SR, Hoofnagle AN, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-23 and incident atrial fibrillation: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA) and the cardiovascular health study (CHS). Circulation. (2014) 130:298–307. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Alonso A, Misialek JR, Eckfeldt JH, Selvin E, Coresh J, Chen LY, et al. Circulating fibroblast growth factor-23 and the incidence of atrial fibrillation: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. J Am Heart Assoc. (2014) 3:e001082. 10.1161/JAHA.114.001082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Akhabue E, Montag S, Reis JP, Pool LR, Mehta R, Yancy CW, et al. FGF23 (Fibroblast Growth Factor-23) and incident hypertension in young and middle-aged adults: the CARDIA study. Hypertension. (2018) 72:70–6. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fyfe-Johnson AL, Alonso A, Selvin E, Bower JK, Pankow JS, Agarwal SK, et al. Serum fibroblast growth factor-23 and incident hypertension: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. J Hypertension. (2016) 34:1266–72. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Drew DA, Katz R, Kritchevsky S, Ix JH, Shlipak MG, Newman AB, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and blood pressure in older adults: the health, aging, and body composition study. Hypertension. (2020) 76:236–43. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Panwar B, Judd SE, Wadley VG, Jenny NS, Howard VJ, Safford MM, et al. Association of fibroblast growth factor 23 with risk of incident coronary heart disease in community-living adults. JAMA Cardiol. (2018) 3:318–25. 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jovanovich A, Ix JH, Gottdiener J, McFann K, Katz R, Kestenbaum B, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23, left ventricular mass, and left ventricular hypertrophy in community-dwelling older adults. Atherosclerosis. (2013) 231:114–9. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.09.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Deo R, Katz R, De Boer IH, Sotoodehnia N, Kestenbaum B, Mukamal KJ, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and sudden versus non-sudden cardiac death: the cardiovascular health study. Am J Kidney Dis. (2015) 66:40–6. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.10.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ärnlöv J, Carlsson AC, Sundström J, Ingelsson E, Larsson A, Lind L, et al. Higher fibroblast growth factor-23 increases the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the community. Kidney Int. (2013) 83:160–6. 10.1038/ki.2012.327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Brandenburg VM, Kleber ME, Vervloet MG, Tomaschitz A, Pilz S, Stojakovic T, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) and mortality: the ludwigshafen risk and cardiovascular health study. Atherosclerosis. (2014) 237:53–9. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.08.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sharma S, Katz R, Dubin RF, Drew DA, Gutierrez OM, Shlipak MG, et al. FGF23 and cause-specific mortality in community-living individuals—the health, aging, and body composition study. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2021) 69:711–7. 10.1111/jgs.16910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Souma N, Isakova T, Lipiszko D, Sacco RL, Elkind MSV, DeRosa JT, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and cause-specific mortality in the general population: the northern Manhattan study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2016) 101:3779–86. 10.1210/jc.2016-2215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Westerberg PA, Tivesten Å, Karlsson MK, Mellström D, Orwoll E, Ohlsson C, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23, mineral metabolism and mortality among elderly men (Swedish MrOs). BMC Nephrol. (2013) 14:85. 10.1186/1471-2369-14-85 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.De Jong MA, Eisenga MF, Van Ballegooijen AJ, Beulens JWJ, Vervloet MG, Navis G, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and new-onset chronic kidney disease in the general population: the prevention of renal and vascular endstage disease (PREVEND) study. Nephrol Dialysis Transpl. (2021) 36:121–8. 10.1093/ndt/gfz266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Singh GM, Danaei G, Pelizzari PM, Lin JK, Cowan MJ, Stevens GA, et al. The age associations of blood pressure, cholesterol, and glucose: analysis of health examination surveys from international populations. Circulation. (2012) 125:2204–11. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.058834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Donato AJ, Machin DR, Lesniewski LA. Mechanisms of dysfunction in the aging vasculature and role in age-related disease. Circ Res. (2018) 123:825–48. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hu MC, Shi M, Cho HJ, Adams-Huet B, Paek J, Hill K, et al. Klotho and phosphate are modulators of pathologic uremic cardiac remodeling. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2015) 26:1290–302. 10.1681/ASN.2014050465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Marçais C, Maucort-Boulch D, Drai J, Dantony E, Carlier MC, Blond E, et al. Circulating klotho associates with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality during hemodialysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2017) 102:3154–61. 10.1210/jc.2017-00104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Vázquez-Sánchez S, Poveda J, Navarro-García JA, González-Lafuente L, Rodríguez-Sánchez E, Ruilope LM, et al. An Overview of FGF-23 as a novel candidate biomarker of cardiovascular risk. Front Physiol. (2021) 12:632260. 10.3389/fphys.2021.632260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Faul C, Amaral AP, Oskouei B, Hu MC, Sloan A, Isakova T, et al. FGF23 induces left ventricular hypertrophy. J Clin Investig. (2011) 121:4393–408. 10.1172/JCI46122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ding HY, Ma HX. Significant roles of anti-aging protein klotho and fibroblast growth factor23 in cardiovascular disease. J Geriatr Cardiol. (2015) 12:439–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Leifheit-Nestler M, Haffner D. Paracrine effects of FGF23 on the heart. Front Endocrinol. (2018) 9:278. 10.3389/fendo.2018.00278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ezumba I, Quarles LD, Kovesdy CP. FGF23 and the heart. G Ital Nefrol. (2014) 31:gin/31.6.12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Law JP, Price AM, Pickup L, Radhakrishnan A, Weston C, Jones AM, et al. Clinical potential of targeting fibroblast growth factor-23 and αklotho in the treatment of uremic cardiomyopathy. J Am Heart Assoc. (2020) 9:e016041. 10.1161/JAHA.120.016041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lu X, Hu MC. Klotho/FGF23 axis in chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease. Kidney Dis. (2017) 3:15–23. 10.1159/000452880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Murphy TP, Dhangana R, Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB., Sr. Ankle-brachial index and cardiovascular risk prediction: an analysis of 11,594 individuals with 10-year follow-up. Atherosclerosis. (2012) 220:160–7. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.10.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Faggiano A, Santangelo G, Carugo S, Pressman G, Picano E, Faggiano P. Cardiovascular calcification as a marker of increased cardiovascular risk and a surrogate for subclinical atherosclerosis: role of echocardiography. J Clin Med. (2021) 10:1668. 10.3390/jcm10081668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Song T, Fu Y, Wang Y, Li W, Zhao J, Wang X, et al. FGF-23 correlates with endocrine and metabolism dysregulation, worse cardiac and renal function, inflammation level, stenosis degree, and independently predicts in-stent restenosis risk in coronary heart disease patients underwent drug-eluting-stent PCI. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. (2021) 21:24. 10.1186/s12872-020-01839-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cornelissen A, Florescu R, Kneizeh K, Cornelissen C, Brandenburg V, Liehn E, et al. Intact fibroblast growth factor 23 levels and outcome prediction in patients with acute heart failure. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:15507. 10.1038/s41598-021-94780-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.


Articles from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES