Skip to main content
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth logoLink to BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
. 2022 Nov 16;22:844. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05206-9

Time to first birth and its predictors among reproductive age women in high fertility countries in Sub-Saharan Africa: Inverse Weibull gamma shared frailty model

Wubshet Debebe Negash 1,, Desale Bihonegn Asmamaw 2
PMCID: PMC9670487  PMID: 36384519

Abstract

Background

Early initiation of childbearing leads to an increase in total fertility rate and population growth. It has been linked with both maternal and child morbidity and mortality. However, there is limited information on the timing of the first birth and its predictors in the area so far. Therefore, determining the time to first birth and its predictors will help to design strategies to improve fertility rate, maternal and child survival.

Methods

The survey used recent (2010 – 2018) Demographic and Health data; a stratified, two-stage cluster sampling technique was used to select the sample. Inverse Weibull gamma shared frailty model was used to model the data at 95% confidence interval. Adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) and median hazard ratio (MHR) were reported as effect size. Statistical significance was declared at p value < 0.05.

Results

The overall median age at first birth was found to be 19 years (IQR: 16, 21 years). Rural residency (AHR = 1.02, 95%, CI 1.00,1.04), agricultural employee (AHR = 1.14, 95%, CI 1.13, 1.17), and nonagricultural employee (AHR = 1.06, 95%, CI 1.05, 1.08), marriage below 15 years (AHR = 5.47, 95%, CI 5.37, 5.57) and 15–17 years (AHR = 3.27, 95%, CI 3.22, 3.32), had sex below 15 years (AHR =  = 1.57, 95%, CI 1.54, 1.61) and 15–17 years (AHR = 1.38, 95%, CI 1.38, 1.43), women who had unmet need for contraceptive (AHR = 1.39, 95%, CI 1.37, 1.42), and met need (AHR = 1.32, 95%, CI 1.30, 1.35), high spousal age gap (AHR = 1.17, 95%, CI 1.15, 1.19), not heard family planning message (AHR = 1.02, 95%, CI 1.01,1.04) were the higher hazard of early childbirth.

Conclusion

The median age at first birth was found to be 19 years. This is lower than the optimal age for giving first birth, which is between late 20 s and early 30 s years. Rural residences, occupation, hearing family planning massage in the media, early sexual intercourse, early age at first marriage, high spousal gap, and unmet need for family planning were predictors of first birth at an early age. Thus, governments and non-governmental organizations should strive to implement programs that aim to reduce early age at first birth by considering these factors.

Keywords: Time to first birth, Predictors, Reproductive age women, High fertility countries

Background

Age at first birth refers to the age of the mother when she gave birth to her first child and is a transition mark for women into motherhood [1]. It plays a significant role in the future life of each woman and has a direct relationship with fertility [2]. A woman’s age at which she begins childbearing can affect the number of children she will have, which in turn impacts the size, composition, and future growth of the population [3, 4].

Women who had their first child at a young age were more likely to have more children than those who had their first child later in life [5]. South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) continue to have the highest proportions of child brides (44 percent and 18 percent, respectively) [6]. At age 18, 20% of women around the world, give birth to a child [7]. In developing countries, 2 million of the 7.3 million births to adolescents under the age of 18 are to girls under the age of 15 [8]. Whereas East Asia and the Pacific had a median birth age of 20.2 years [9]. Studies from the perspective of individual countries reveal different mean times of motherhood. For example, the median age at first birth in Ethiopia [10] and Nigeria [11] was 20 years. In Angola, 1 in 20 women age 15–19 had their first birth before age 15 [12].

Early childbearing affects the health of the mothers and their infants negatively [1315], and may also have an economic impact on the family [3, 4]. It has consequences such as; poor prenatal health care, low birth weights, and higher mortality [16, 17]. The growing body of literatures revealed that the timing of first birth has both demographic and non-demographic effects on the woman throughout her lifetime [18]. First births before the age of 20 affect future health and increase all causes of maternal mortality [19, 20]. Research from 36 countries revealed the average relative risk of death in children under five years old is about 46% higher than in children born to mothers under 18, and 12% higher than in children born to mothers between 18 and 19, compared to children of mothers between 20 and 34 [21].

In various literatures, socio-demographic and economic factors were identified as predictors of age at first childbearing. These include early age at first sex [10, 22, 23], high spousal age differences [10], no formal education or lower levels of education [22, 24]. Early age at first marriage is one of the most consistent findings across the studies as predictors for early age at first birth [16, 25].

Determining the early age fertility benefits by providing comprehensive information about the timing of first birth and the reason behind early age delivery among reproductive age women in the high fertility SSA countries taking into account the correlated nature of the data. Therefore, the study will be useful to researchers and planners who wish to improve the health of mothers and children from a cluster effect perspective. Considering the above justifications, the main aim of this study was to investigate age at first motherhood and the predictors of early childbirth among reproductive-age women in high fertility Sub-Saharan Africa. This is further justified because early childbirth is the most important factor of population growth in sub-Saharan Africa [10, 26].

Methods

Study settings and data source

Community-based cross-sectional survey was conducted between January 2010 and December 2018 among reproductive age women in high fertility countries in SSA. Niger, Democratic Republic of Congo, Mali, Chad, Angola, Burundi, Nigeria, Gambia, and Burkina Faso were included in this study. These countries were selected because they are the top ten countries with high fertility rates in SSA, with fertility rates above 5.0, a value that is higher than the rate of 4.44 in Africa and 2.47 worldwide [27]. One country (Somalia) with no DHS data was excluded from the analysis.

After authorization was granted via an online request explaining the purpose of our study, we obtained data for these countries from the DHS program's official database, (https://dhsprogram.com). We used the woman’s record (IR file) data set and extracted the dependent and independent variables. The DHS is a nationally representative household survey that is conducted across low and middle-income countries every five years [28]. It has been an essential data source on issues of reproductive health in low and middle income countries as it gathers data on a number of reproductive health issues such as marriage, fertility, fertility preferences, and contraception [28].

Study participants were selected using a two-stage stratified sampling technique. Enumeration areas (EAs) were randomly selected in the first stage, while households were randomly selected in the second stage. Women declared infecund were excluded from this study.

Study variables

The outcome variable of this study is the time to first birth (age in years) when a woman [1549] years gave birth to her first childbearing until the data collection period [1, 2, 29]. The explanatory variables included socio-demographic and economic-related factors (educational status, employment status, residence, wealth index, and hearing family planning messages in the mass media), and age at first sex, age at first marriage, spousal age gap, and demand for contraceptives.

Operational definitions

Event: giving first birth.

Censored: Not giving first birth.

Time to event/waiting time: it is the time taken in years (age) from her birth to age at first birth [1, 2, 10, 29].

Data analysis

STATA version 14 Statistical software was used to extract, clean, code, and analyze data. Sample weights were done before further analysis, and descriptive statistics were described using frequencies, percentages, median, and interquartile range, and presented using tables, figures, and narratives. The Kaplan–Meier (K–M) method was used to estimate the time to first birth. The log rank test was used to compare survival experiences across categorical predictor variables and to reveal the statistical significance of the observed difference in the Kaplan–Meier survival plot. The Schoenfeld residual test was used to test the proportional hazard assumption.

Because the data were correlated at the cluster level, we used a shared frailty model to predict time to first birth among reproductive-age women in high fertility countries in SSA, assuming time to first birth is constant in the same clusters. Model adequacy was checked using Akaike Information Criteria (AIC).

Stratified analysis and a chi-square test were done for interaction terms. Finally, adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) was reported as a measure of effect size at 95% significant level and p value < 0.05. The median hazard ratio (MHR) was used to compare high and low risk clusters of time to early childbirth.

Results

A total weighted sample of 186,771 reproductive age women were included in the study. The majority (22.23%) of the women were from Nigeria (Table 1).

Table 1.

Description of Surveys and sample size characteristics in high fertility countries in SSA

Countries Survey year Weighted sample (n) Weighted percentage (%)
Angola 2015/16 14357 7.69
Burkina Faso 2010 16978 9.09
Burundi 2016/17 17112 9.16
Chad 2014/15 17600 9.42
DR Congo 2013/14 37284 19.96
Gambia 2013 20348 10.89
Mali 2018 10465 5.60
Nigeria 2012 41525 22.23
Niger 2012 11102 5.94

Baseline socio-demographic and reproductive characteristics of the study participants

A total weighted sample of 186,771 women was included in this study. Of the study participants, one-fifth (21.33%) were aged below 20 years. Three-fourths (75.49%) of the participants were married. Regarding residence, the majority (70.85%) of them were rural dwellers. The majority (74.67%) of the study participants had an age gap of five and above years with their partners (Table 2).

Table 2.

Socio-demographic and reproductive health-related factors among reproductive age women in high fertility countries in SSA (n = 186,771)

Variables Categories Weighted frequency Weighted percentage
Age in years < 20 39826 21.33
20–29 68854 36.87
≥ 30 78081 41.80
Current marital status Married 140989 75.49
Unmarried 45782 24.51
Residence Urban 70578 37.79
Rural 116193 62.21
Age at first sex in years < 15 50831 27.23
15–17 98154 52.58
≥ 18 37676 20.19
Age at first marriage in years < 15 26353 18.69
15–17 50350 35.71
≥ 18 64287 45.60
Spousal age gap in years < 5 32419 25.33
≥ 5 95569 74.67
Modern contraceptive use Yes 26348 14.11
No 160423 85.89
Demand for contraceptive No demand 64001 34.27
Unmet need 35719 19.12
Meet need 87051 46.61

Socio-economic and information related characteristics

The result revealed that 78,169 (41.85%) of the respondents had not completed at least primary education. The majority (85.89%) of the participants were not used modern contraception (Table 3).

Table 3.

Socio economic and information related factors among reproductive age women high fertility countries in SSA (n = 186,771)

Variables Categories Weighted frequency Weighted percentage
Educational status of the respondents No formal education 78169 41.85
Primary education 43264 23.16
Secondary and above 65338 34.98
Educational status of the partner No formal education 62561 33.50
Primary education 23411 12.53
Secondary and above 100799 53.97
Occupation of the respondent No working 53239 28.50
Agricultural employee 48580 26.01
Nonagricultural employee 84952 45.48
Occupation of the partners No working 4122 2.21
Agricultural employee 61679 33.02
Nonagricultural employee 120970 64.77
Wealth index Poor 68873 36.88
Middle 36003 19.28
Rich 81895 43.85
Media exposure Yes 118920 63.67
No 67851 36.33
Hearing family planning massage on media Yes 132333 70.85
No 54438 29.15
Modern contraceptive use Yes 26348 14.11
No 160423 85.89
Demand for contraceptive No demand 64001 34.27
Unmet need 35719 19.12
Meet need 87051 46.61

Time to first birth among respondents

Majority (73.57%) of the study participants had given their first birth. The overall median time to their first birth was 19 years (IQR: 16, 21) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Kaplan–Meier failure estimates of time to first birth among reproductive-age women in high fertility countries in SSA

Predictors of time to first birth among reproductive age women

Using the Kaplan–Meier failure function and the log rank test (X2), all predictors were determined at baseline. According to the log rank test, all the predictor variables showed significant survival differences at p = 0.001 (Table 4).

Table 4.

Kaplan–Meier failure estimate and log rank test comparison of time to first birth among women in high fertility countries in SSA (n = 186,771)

Characteristics Categories N (%) weighted value Ever given birth Median (IQR) years Log rank P-value
Residence Urban 70578 46387 19(17,22) 1472.71 0.001
Rural 116193 91025 18(16,21)
Age at first sex < 15 50831 18696 16(15,18) 21539.05 0.001
15–17 98154 87416 18(16,20)
≥ 18 37676 31243 21(20, 24)
Age at first marriage < 15 26353 25203 15(14,16) 77828.67 0.001
15–17 50350 46879 17(16,18)
≥ 18 64287 59407 21(19,24)
Spousal age gap < 5 32419 30425 20(17,22) 2388.29 0.001
≥ 5 95569 28908 18(16,21)
Demand for contraceptive No demand 64001 27518 18(16,22) 159.94
Unmet need 35719 32840 18(17,21)
Meet need 87051 77053 19(17,21)
Occupation of the respondent No working 53239 32316 18(16,21) 699.5 0.001
Agricultural employee 48580 40676 19(17,21)
Nonagricultural employee 84952 64419 19(16,22)
Hearing FP massage on media Yes 132333 98545 18(16,21) 87.42 0.001
No 54438 38866 19(16,21)

Possible model selection

Cox proportional hazard model

In bivariable analysis, seven predictors were significant at p-value of < 0.2 and then entered into the multivariable Cox model. Marriage was reduced from the model due to collinearity. After that, the Schoenfeld test for proportional hazard assumption was conducted. The proportional hazard assumption was violated in both the global test and log rank test due to the correlation of time to first birth. Due to this, Cox model was excluded. Secondly, the stratified Cox model was excluded because none of the predictor variables fulfilled the proportional hazard assumption in the model. In the end, the parametric models were included in this study (Table 5).

Table 5.

Schoenfeld residual test for proportionality assumption of the Cox model among women in high fertility countries in SSA (n = 186,771)

Predictors Rho Chi2 Degree of freedom Prob > chi2
Residence 0.01 24.02 1 < 0.001
Occupation of the respondent 0.00 4.04 1 0.04
Age at first sex 0.09 1048.05 1 < 0.01
Age at first marriage 0.027 6661.05 1 < 0.001
Demand for contraceptive 0.04 222.8 1 < 0.001
Spousal age gap -0.01 23.21 1 < 0.001
Hearing family planning massage on media 0.01 21.13 1 < 0.001
Global test 12924.96 7 < 0.001

Parametric survival model selection

Parametric shared frailty model

Variance of frailty (theta = 0) was statistically significant at p value of < 0.001, for all baseline hazard function with both inverse Gaussian and gamma shared frailty distribution. In other words, the frailty component influences the model and there is a correlation within the cluster. Finally, the inverse Weibull gamma shared frailty model was used for this study due to its lowest AIC (Table 6).

Table 6.

Parametric shared frailty model comparison on time to first birth among reproductive age women in high fertility countries in SSA (n = 186,771)

Model Log-likely hood DF AIC Variance of theta LR test of θ= 0
Inverse Weibull gamma 39,433.17 22 -78822.35 0.085 < 0.001a
Gompertz gamma 16,056.59 22 -32069.18 0.13 < 0.001

a prefered model AIC Akakie information system, DF Degree of freedom

Multi variable analysis of inverse Weibull gamma shared frailty model for time to first birth and its predictors

In the multivariable inverse Weibull gamma shared frailty model, there was a reduction of frailty from the null model (only with the cluster effect) of 0.19 to 0.084 in the full model (with predictor variables). Accordingly, residence, occupation of the respondent, hearing family planning massages in the media, age at first sex, age at first marriage, demand for contraceptive, and spousal age gap were significant predictors of age at 1st birth at 95% confidence level.

Having the same level of frailty, women with agricultural employee and nonagricultural employee had 1.14 times (AHR = 1.14, 95%, CI 1.13, 1.17) and 1.06 times (AHR = 1.06, 95%, CI 1.05, 1.08) higher hazard of first birth at an early age as compared with no working women, respectively.

Women who had below 15 years at marriage and aged 15–17 years were 5.47 times (AHR = 5.47, 95%, CI 5.37, 5.57) and 3.27 times (AHR = 3.27, 95%, CI 3.22, 3.32) increases the hazard of first birth at an early age, respectively.

Women having first sex at the age of below 15 years increases the hazard of early childbirth by 1.57 times (AHR = 1.57, 95%, CI 1.54, 1.61) and 15–17 years 1.41 times (AHR = 1.41, 95%, CI 1.38, 1.43) than women aged 18 and above years keeping all other factors constant.

With the same level of frailty and keeping all other factors constant, women living in rural areas increase the hazard of early childbirth (AHR = 1.02, 95%, CI 1.00,1.04) than living in urban residents.

With the same level of frailty and adjusting for other factors, women who had an unmet need for contraceptives increases the hazard of early childbirth by 1. 39 times (AHR = 1.39, 95%, CI 1.37, 1.42), and met need by 1.32 times (AHR = 1.32, 95%, CI 1.30, 1.35) than no demand for contraception.

Women who had a spousal age gap five years and above had 1.17 times (AHR = 1.17, 95%, CI 1.15, 1.19) more hazard of early childbirth than their counterparts.

Given that on the same cluster and holding constant all other factors, women who have not heard family planning messages in the media had a higher hazard of early childbirth (AHR = 1.02, 95%, CI 1.01,1.04) (Table 7).

Table 7.

Multivariable analysis of inverse Weibull gamma shared frailty model for time to first birth and among reproductive-age women in high fertility countries in SSA (n = 186,771)

Variables Null model First birth Status Full model
Log likelihood 12,178.38 39,215.03
Effect size Event Censored CHR ( 95%, CI) AHR ( 95%, CI)
Residence
 Urban 46387 24191 1 1
 Rural 91025 25168 1.22 (1.21, 1.24) 1.02 (1.00, 1.04)
Occupation of the respondent
 No working 32316 20923 1 1
 agricultural employee 40676 7904 0.91 (0.89, 0.91) 1.14 (1.13, 1.17)
 Nonagricultural employee 64419 20533 0.91 (0.89, 0.92) 1.06 (1.05, 1.08)
Age at first sex
 < 15 18696 32135 3.07 (3.01, 3.13) 1.57 (1.54, 1.61)
 15–17 87416 10738 2.19 (2.16, 2.22) 1.41 (1.38, 1.43)
 ≥ 18 31243 6433 1 1
Age at first marriage
 < 15 25203 1150 6.24 (6.14, 6.33) 5.47 (5.37, 5.57)
 15–17 46879 3471 3.67 (3.63, 3.72) 3.27 (3.22, 3.32)
 ≥ 18 59,407 4878 1 1
Demand for contraceptive
 No demand 27519 36483 1 1
 Unmet need for contraceptive 32840 2879 1.20 (1.18, 1.22) 1.39 (1.37, 1.42)
 Met need for contraceptive 77053 9998 1.15 (1.14, 1.17) 1.32 (1.30, 1.35)
Spousal age gap
 < 5 30425 1994 1 1
 ≥ 5 88908 6661 1.40 (1.38, 1.42) 1.17 (1.15, 1.19)
Hearing family planning massage on media
 Yes 98545 33788 1 1
 No 38866 15571 0.92 (0.91, 0.94) 1.02 (1.01, 1.04)
 Theta 0.19 (0.18, 0.21) 0.084 (0.075, 0.093)
 MHR 1.52(1.503, 1.55) 1.32(1.30, 1.34)
 LR test of theta = 0 < 0.001 < 0.001
 Prob-hibar2 7602.79 3610.87

AHR Adjusted hazard ratio, CHR Crude hazard ratio, MHR median hazard ratio, LR Log rank

Discussion

In the current study, the median age at first birth was found to be 19 (IQR = 16, 21) years in high fertility countries. The result of the study showed that residence, occupation of the respondent, age at first sex, age at first marriage, demand for contraceptives, spousal age gap, and hearing family planning messages in the media were identified as the predictive factors for time to first birth among reproductive age women in high fertility countries in SSA.

This finding is in line with results from Ethiopia (20 years) [10], Bangladesh (16.34 years) [30], Kenya (20.3 years) [31], Swaziland (18.22 years) [32], Nigeria (19 years) [11], and Uganda (19.2 years) [33]. This might be because, in these countries, early marriage and sexual intercourse activities at an early age are highly prevalent [10, 34, 35]. Early marriage compromises women’s reproductive health decisions, leading to early childbearing [36]. The other possible reason for this similarity might be the limited educational opportunities for girls in these countries since most of the population lives in rural areas, which forces them to get married at an early age, to get social and financial support [35, 3739].

However, our finding was significantly lower than that of developed countries (> 30 years) [40, 41]. The possible explanation might be that adolescent girls in developed countries are more likely to stay in school for their adolescent age and a number of women go out to work for their economic independence, which helps mothers delay their first birth [42, 43]. Another possible reason could be that women in developed countries have good awareness about the consequences of early childbirth and have access to family planning to delay the first birth. Moreover, in developed countries, women have the right to exercise their reproductive rights and make their own reproductive health decisions [4244]. Our result was also lower than the results from Egypt 22.6 years [45], and Ghana 21.4 years [46]. It may be due to differences in the prevalence of unmet need for family planning, the median age at first marriage and the age at first sexual intercourse [47, 48]. For example, unmet need for family planning in Egypt was 13% [45] whereas in high fertility countries in SSA, unmet need for family planning was 24.9% [48].

In this study, residence was one of the predictors for time to first birth. Women who lived in rural areas had higher hazards of having first birth at an early age than those who were lived in urban areas. This finding is similar to findings in Nigeria [11], Swaziland [32], Bangladesh [2], and Uganda [49]. The possible reason could be cultural malpractices like early marriage and abduction, which were highly prevalent in rural areas of SSA than their counterparts [37, 50]. Moreover, women in rural areas are less likely to be educated and less likely to be from educated parents, which means they have poor awareness of the consequences of early childbirth and a high unmet need for contraceptives [11, 37].

In this study, women’s occupation was inversely associated with early childbearing. This result was corroborated with study findings in the USA [51]. Possible explanations for the inverse association between occupational status and childbearing at an early age may be women who have their own work, are usually educated and have good awareness of family planning methods [52]. Furthermore, women who have their own jobs had the autonomy to make decisions related to household expenditure. This is important to understand as women who have access to spending money have improved reproductive decision making power and freedom of movement to access contraceptive services [53].

Hearing family planning massage in the media was associated with increased hazards of early age maternity compared to the counterparts. The reason for this could be that women who did not hear about family planning massage in the media might have had limited knowledge about contraception and the consequences of early childbirth [54].

Women who began sexual intercourse at an early age had higher hazards of having their first birth at an early age than those who began intercourse at a later age. This is in consistent with studies done in Ghana [55], Bangladesh [56] and Swaziland [57]. The possible explanation might be due to the exclusion of adolescents from education and sociocultural misconceptions regarding female sexual and reproductive health issues in these developing countries [39]. In addition, modern contraceptive use among early sexual initiators is lower than late initiators [38].

Age at marriage was also another predictor for age at first childbirth, as women got married early. The hazard of early childbearing at an early age was increased. This finding is in agreement with findings from Ethiopia [10, 34], Nigeria [11] and Bangladesh [2, 58]. This may be due to in developing countries, adolescent girl housewives are characterized by low educational attainment, low reproductive health knowledge, are economic dependent on their partners and less probability of autonomy in the decision-making process which fundamentally limit their ability to delay their childbearing to older ages [38, 59]. Moreover, early marriage increases the frequency of fertile sexual intercourses, and it leads to early childbearing [50, 60].

Regarding the spousal age, a higher spousal age gap significantly increased the hazard of early age at first birth compared to a low spousal age gap. This finding was coherent with the studies conducted in Ethiopia [10], Nigeria [61], and Bangladesh [62]. The possible explanation might be that a higher spousal age gap may lead to imbalanced power relations in the family and less probability of reproductive health discussions, including the decision to use family planning [53, 63].

Unmet need for family planning was found to be linked with higher early age maternity. This result was in agreement with reports in Nigeria [64], and Bangladesh [65]. The possible reason may be that sexually active women who have an unmet need for family planning may not be able to postpone unintended pregnancy and early births more often than those who do not have unmet need for family planning [34, 64].

The study's main strength was that it used nationally representative survey data and concentrated on high fertility countries in SSA. In addition, the DHS uses validated instruments in its appraisals of datasets along with its large sample size and well-designed procedures, such as training field enumerators and employing well-tested methods for data collection. However, DHS surveys are based on self-reported information and thus are prone to recall and social desirability bias. For example, there may be under-reporting of births that end in death. Furthermore, due to the use of secondary data, essential factors like socio-cultural factors were not available in the DHS data set. Hence, it was not possible to incorporate these variables.

Due to the high fertility rate, sub-Saharan Africa has contributed most of the world’s unexpected population dynamics. Strategies targeting early child birth plays a crucial role in helping to regulate population growth, and to improve the physical and economic wellbeing of women and their families as well as for the countries. However, in Sub-Saharan African countries with high fertility, 50% of reproductive age women give birth before their 19 years. Thus, thousands of reproductive age women died because of pregnancy related complications. Moreover, teenagers (10–19 years) are at higher risk for eclampsia, puerperal endometritis, and systemic infections, as well as low birth weight, preterm birth, and severe neonatal conditions. In order to combat the problem and to control total fertility rate, the respective country governments, nongovernmental organizations and policymakers should try to enhance access to contraception, particularly for women living in rural areas. Moreover, as a strategy for fertility reduction and maternal health improvement, women can delay first births by being empowered with job opportunities and regular family planning messages through mass media.

Conclusion

In the current study, the median age at first birth was found to be 19 years, which is lower than the optimal age for giving first birth, which is between the late 20 s and early 30 s years [6668]. Living in rural residences, early sexual intercourse, early age at first marriage, a high spousal age gap, and unmet need for family planning were predictors of first birth at an early age. On the other hand, occupation of the respondent and hearing family planning messages in the media were predictors of delayed first birth at an early age. Thus, governments and other responsible bodies should strive to implement programs to enhance access to contraception, particularly for women living in rural areas, to reduce unmet need for family planning. Since early childbirth, which often originated from early marriage, result in potential health risks for the young mother and their child, as well as blurred future job prospects. As a strategy for fertility reduction and maternal health improvement, women can delay first births by being empowered with job opportunity and regular family planning messages through mass media.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the DHS programs, for the permission to use all the relevant DHS data for this study.

Abbreviations

AIC

Akaike Information Criteria

AOR

Adjusted Odds Ratio

CI

Confidence Interval

DF

Degree of Freedom

DHS

Demographic and Health Survey

MHR

Median Hazard Ratio

SSA

Sub-Saharan Africa

WHO

World Health Organization

Authors’ contributions

Both authors conceived the study, reviewed the literature, carried out the statistical analysis, interpreted the result, and wrote the manuscript. Gave final approval of the manuscript to be published, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Data for this study were sourced from Demographic and Health surveys (DHS), which is freely available online at (https://dhsprogram.com).

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

In this study, secondary data were collected from publicly available, aggregated sources that were not associated with study participants' identifying information. All data were kept confidential anonymously. All the methods of the study were conducted according to the Helsinki declarations. More details regarding DHS data and ethical standards are available online at (http://www.dhsprogram.com).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Wubshet Debebe Negash, Email: wubshetdn@gmail.com.

Desale Bihonegn Asmamaw, Email: desalebihonegn1988@gmail.com.

References

  • 1.Mathews TJ. Delayed childbearing: more women are having their first child later in life. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. 2009;10(3):112–6.
  • 2.Rabbi AMF, Kabir M. Factors influencing age at first birth of Bangladeshi women-a multivariate approach. Am J Public Health Research. 2013;1(7):191–195. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gyimah SO. A cohort analysis of the timing of first birth and fertility in Ghana. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2003;22(3):251–266. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mathews TJ. Delayed childbearing: more women are having their first child later in life: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gyimah SO. A cohort analysis of the timing of first birth and fertility in Ghana. Population Research and Policy Review. 2003:251–66.
  • 6.Gastón CM, Misunas C, Cappa C. Child marriage among boys: a global overview of available data. Vulnerable Child Youth Stud. 2019;14(3):219–228. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Beguy D, Ndugwa R, Kabiru CW. Entry into motherhood among adolescent girls in two informal settlements in Nairobi. Kenya J Biosoc Sci. 2013;45(6):721–742. doi: 10.1017/S0021932013000199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Campbell B, Martinelli-heckadon S, Wong S. Motherhood in Childhood. The State of World Population. 2013. available at: https://www.unfpa.org
  • 9.Kennedy E, Gray N, Azzopardi P, Creati M. Adolescent fertility and family planning in East Asia and the Pacific: a review of DHS reports. Reprod Health. 2011;8(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-8-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dewau R, Mekonnen FA, Seretew WS. Time to first birth and its predictors among reproductive-age women in Ethiopia: inverse Weibull gamma shared frailty model. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01254-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fagbamigbe AF, Idemudia ES. Survival analysis and prognostic factors of timing of first childbirth among women in Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0895-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Angolan Demographic and Health survey 2015/16 report. Available at: https://dhsprogram.com
  • 13.Coombs LC, Freedman R. Pre-marital pregnancy, childspacing, and later economic achievement. Popul Stud. 1970;24(3):389–412. doi: 10.1080/00324728.1970.10406136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rutstein SO. Effects of preceding birth intervals on neonatal, infant and under-five years mortality and nutritional status in developing countries: evidence from the demographic and health surveys. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005;89:S7–S24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cooper GS, Schildkraut JM, Whittemore AS, Marchbanks PA. Pregnancy recency and risk of ovarian cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 1999;10(5):397–402. doi: 10.1023/a:1008960520316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.LeGrand TK, Mbacké CS. Teenage pregnancy and child health in the urban Sahel. Stud Fam Plan. 1993. pp. 137–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zabin LS, Kiragu K. The health consequences of adolescent sexual and fertility behavior in sub-Saharan Africa. Stud Fam Plann. 1998;29(2):210–32. PMID: 9664633. [PubMed]
  • 18.Mirowsky J, Ross CE. Depression, parenthood, and age at first birth. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(8):1281–1298. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00096-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Doblhammer G. Reproductive history and mortality later in life: a comparative study of England and Wales and Austria. Popul Stud. 2000;54(2):169–176. doi: 10.1080/713779087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Henretta JC. Early childbearing, marital status, and women's health and mortality after age 50. J Health Soc Behav. 2007;48(3):254–266. doi: 10.1177/002214650704800304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pradhan J, Arokiasamy P. High infant and child mortality rates in Orissa: an assessment of major reasons. Popul Space Place. 2006;12(3):187–200. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nahar MZ, Zahangir MS, Shafiqul IS. Age at first marriage and its relation to fertility in Bangladesh. Chin J Popul Res Environ. 2013;11(3):227–235. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Motsima T. The risk factors associated with early age at first birth amongst Angolan women: evidence from the 2015-2016 Angola demographic and health survey. EJMED. 2020;2(2). 10.24018/ejmed.2020.2.2.198. Available from: https://ej-med.org/index.php/ejmed/article/view/198. [cited 2022 Nov. 15].
  • 24.Ferre C. Age at first child: does education delay fertility timing? The case of Kenya (February 1, 2009). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4833. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1344718.
  • 25.Mukhlesur R, Ameen A, Mohammad A. Analysis of marriage to first birth interval in Bangladesh. Int J Manag Sustain. 2013;2:208–219. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ahinkorah BO. Maternal age at first childbirth and under-five morbidity in sub-Saharan Africa: analysis of cross-sectional data of 32 countries. Archives of Public Health. 2021;79(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00674-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.African countries with the highest fertility rate | Statista https://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/total-fertility-rate. Cited on 8 Dec 2021.
  • 28.Corsi DJ, Neuman M, Finlay JE, Subramanian S. Demographic and health surveys: a profile. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(6):1602–1613. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mathews TJ, Hamilton BE. Mean age of mothers is on the rise: United States, 2000–2014. NCHS Data Brief. 2016;232:1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Karim MA, Faruk MO. Patterns and differentials of age at first motherhood among married adolescents in Bangladesh. Biomedical Sciences. 2021;7(3):86. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Statistics KNBo. Kenya demographic and health survey 2014. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Health/Kenya, National AIDS. Available at: https://www.dhsprogram.com
  • 32.Mhele K. Determinants of time to first birth among women in ages 15–24 in Swaziland. Afr Popul Stud. 2015;29(2).
  • 33.Demographic U. Health Survey 2016. Kampala, Uganda and Rockville, Maryland, USA. 2018. 2020. Available at: https://dhsprogram.com.
  • 34.Bitew DA, Habitu YA, Gelagay AA. Time to first birth and its determinants among married female youths in Ethiopia, 2020: survival analysis based on EDHS 2016. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01414-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lloyd CB, Mensch BS. Marriage and childbirth as factors in dropping out from school: an analysis of DHS data from sub-Saharan Africa. Popul Stud. 2008;62(1):1–13. doi: 10.1080/00324720701810840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Santhya K. Early marriage and sexual and reproductive health vulnerabilities of young women: a synthesis of recent evidence from developing countries. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23(5):334–339. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32834a93d2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Garenne M. Age at marriage and modernisation in sub-Saharan Africa. South Afr J Demography. 2004;9(2):59–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Olakunle AA, Banougnin BH. Timing between age at first sexual intercourse and age at first use of contraception among adolescents and young adults in Niger: What role do education and place of residence play? Gates Open Res. 2019;3:1463. 10.12688/gatesopenres.12972.1. PMID: 31656951; PMCID: PMC6795034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 39.Organization WH. The sexual and reproductive health of young adolescents in developing countries: reviewing the evidence, identifying research gaps, and moving the agenda: report of a WHO technical consultation, Geneva, 4-5 November 2010. World Health Organization; 2011. Available at: https://apps.who.int.
  • 40.OECD . SF2.3: Age of mothers at childbirth and age-specific fertility. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.SIRC . The Changing Face of Motherhood - Social Issues Research Centre. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hindin MJ, Fatusi AO. Adolescent sexual and reproductive health in developing countries: an overview of trends and interventions. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009;35(2):58–62. doi: 10.1363/ipsrh.35.058.09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chandra-Mouli V, Svanemyr J, Amin A, Fogstad H, Say L, Girard F, et al. Twenty years after International Conference on Population and Development: where are we with adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights? J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(1):s1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bearinger LH, Sieving RE, Ferguson J, Sharma V. Global perspectives on the sexual and reproductive health of adolescents: patterns, prevention, and potential. The lancet. 2007;369(9568):1220–1231. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60367-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.EMOHP E-Z, Demographic I. Health Survey 2014 Ministry of Health and Population [Egypt]. Ministry of Health and Population Cairo, Egypt and Rockville, Maryland, USA and ICF International. 2015. Available at: https://dhsprogram.com.
  • 46.GSS G Ghana statistical service (GSS), Ghana health service (GHS), and ICF macro. Accra: Ghana Demogr Health Surv. 2009;2008:79–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ahonsi B, Fuseini K, Nai D, Goldson E, Owusu S, Ndifuna I, et al. Child marriage in Ghana: evidence from a multi-method study. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0823-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ahinkorah BO. Predictors of unmet need for contraception among adolescent girls and young women in selected high fertility countries in sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel mixed effects analysis. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(8):e0236352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mugarura A, Kaberuka W, Atuhaire R. Factors determining the age at first birth in Uganda. Sci Res. 2016;1(5):61–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Singh S, Samara R. Early marriage among women in developing countries. Int Fam Plann Perspect. 1996;22(4):148–175. doi: 10.2307/2950812. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Landivar LC. First-Birth Timing and the Motherhood Wage Gap in 140 Occupations. Socius. 2020;6:2378023120939424. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Andersen R, Van de Werfhorst HG. Education and occupational status in 14 countries: the role of educational institutions and labour market coordination. Br J Sociol. 2010;61(2):336–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01315.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sharma S, Akhtar F, Singh RK, Mehra S. Early marriage and spousal age difference: predictors of preconception health of young married women in Delhi, India. J Health Res. 2021.
  • 54.Zamawe CO, Banda M, Dube AN. The impact of a community driven mass media campaign on the utilisation of maternal health care services in rural Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0816-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ida LA, Albert L. The statistical distribution and determinants of mother’s age at first birth. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2015;4(2):41–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chowdhury A, Rumana A, Faisal A. Factors affecting age for first birth: an exploratory analysis on Bangladeshi women. Int J Res Stud Med Health Sci. 2017;2(7):31–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ndlovu S, editor Demographic and Socio-Economic Determinants of Age at First Birth in Swaziland. PAA 2017 Annual Meeting. PAA; 2017. Available at: https://paa.confex.com.
  • 58.Ali M, Alauddin S, Maniruzzaman M, Islam SMS. Determinants of early age of mother at first birth in Bangladesh: a statistical analysis using a two-level multiple logistic regression model. J Public Health. 2021;29(5):1081–1087. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Black M. Early marriage: child spouses. Innocenti Digest No. 7. 2001. Available at: https://www.unicef-irc.org.
  • 60.Ethiopia CSA, Macro O. Ethiopia demographic and health survey. Addis Ababa: Central Statistical Agency; 2016. Available at: https://dhsprogram.com.
  • 61.Kunnuji MO, Eshiet I, Nnorom CC. A survival analysis of the timing of onset of childbearing among young females in Nigeria: are predictors the same across regions? Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0623-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Nahar M, Zahangir M. Patterns and determinants of age at first birth in Bangladesh. Turk J Popul Stud. 2013;35:63–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.UNICEF . Early marriage a harmful traditional practice a statistical exploration 2005: Unicef. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hossain MM, Majumder AK. Determinants of the age of mother at first birth in Bangladesh: quantile regression approach. J Public Health. 2019;27(4):419–424. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bishwajit G, Tang S, Yaya S, Feng Z. Unmet need for contraception and its association with unintended pregnancy in Bangladesh. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1379-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Watson S. When can you get pregnant and what’s the best age to have a baby. Healthline. Year of Publication-June. 2018;6. Available at: https://www.healthline.com
  • 67.Pediatrics AAo American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Committee on Obstetric Practice. The Apgar score. Adv Neonatal Care. 2006;6:220–3. doi: 10.1016/j.adnc.2006.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mirowsky J. Parenthood and health: the pivotal and optimal age at first birth. Soc Forces. 2002;81(1):315–349. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data for this study were sourced from Demographic and Health surveys (DHS), which is freely available online at (https://dhsprogram.com).


Articles from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES