ABSTRACT
The Frankia sp. strain R82 genome is described as representative of a novel candidate species within Frankia cluster 1, as indicated by average nucleotide identity (ANI) analyses, with its closest relatives being Frankia nodulisporulans AgTrs and strains Ag45/Mut15 and AgPM24 (86% identity).
ANNOUNCEMENT
The genus Frankia represents nitrogen- and non-nitrogen-fixing actinobacteria that form root nodules in symbiosis with woody plants (1, 2) or occur saprophytically in rhizospheres and soil (3). Recently, several species were described, with increasing species diversity discovered within currently delineated subunits, that is, clusters 1 to 4, with cluster 1 containing isolates infective to Alnus, Myrica, and Casuarina (4).
Here, we describe the draft genome of Frankia sp. strain R82 (LLR161101) obtained from the Agricultural Research Service Culture Collection (Peoria, IL, USA) deposited under NRRL B-16413. The strain was isolated from root nodules of Myrica gale from Black Creek National Refuge, Vermont, United States (44°50′N, 73°08′W) in 1980 (5). This strain was kept at −80°C in 20% glycerol in water (vol/vol) since 2010 and grown in defined propionate medium at 30°C for 15 days (6). Cells were centrifuged (15,000 × g, 5 min), sonicated (10 s at 20% output in S-450 Sonifier; Branson Ultrasonics, Danbury, CT), and DNA extracted using SurePrep soil DNA isolation kits (Fisher Scientific, Houston, TX). The DNA concentration was measured with a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA). The DNA was moderately fragmented to 1,000 nucleotides (nt), and the libraries were prepared for sequencing using standard protocols for Illumina tagmentation and a NextSeq 2000 machine (2 × 150 bp) at the Microbial Genomics Sequencing Center (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (6, 7). The total number of reads was 7,362,308, and the average length was 147.8 bp. Sequence reads were filtered, quality controlled, and trimmed using fastp v0.23.2 with default settings (8), and reads with average %GC of <54 were removed (6). The genome was assembled using SPAdes v3.13.0 (9) and quality checked with QUAST v5.2.0 (10). CheckM v1.0.18 with default values in the lineage workflow (lineage_set) was finally used to assess completeness and coverage (11), and PGAP v6.1 (12) was used to annotate; the N50 value was 37,329. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) (13) of the assembled genome with Frankia type strains of all described species and other selected genomes was determined using Pyani v0.2.11 with b (Blast) setting (14; https://pyani.readthedocs.io).
CheckM scores of 98.5% indicated that the genome of strain R82 was nearly complete, and the contamination index of 1.37 demonstrated the culture was pure. The genome size was 6.89 Mb with a GC of 70.95%, and N50 was 37,329 nt with 370 contigs, with the largest being 180,920 nt. ANI analysis suggests a new species in cluster 1, with the closest relatives being Frankia nodulisporulans AgTrs and strains Ag45/Mut15 and AgPM24, all with 86% sequence identity, followed by strain AiPa1 with 83% and other cluster 1 strains with 80% similarity, including Frankia alni, Frankia torreyi, Frankia canadensis, Frankia alpina, and Frankia casuarinae with 79%. ANI values were lower for representatives of cl2 (76 to 77%), cl3 (77%), and cl4 (76%).
Data availability.
Raw reads were deposited to NCBI (SRA accession number SRX17215055). The genome sequence was deposited at GenBank (accession number JAMQQG000000000). Libraries and sequencing were done at the Microbial Genomics Sequencing Center.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are indebted to the Graduate College (doctoral research support fellowship to S. Vemulapally) and the Department of Biology at Texas State University for financial support.
Contributor Information
Philippe Normand, Email: philippe.normand@univ-lyon1.fr.
Vanja Klepac-Ceraj, Wellesley College.
REFERENCES
- 1.Benson DR, Dawson J. 2007. Recent advances in the biogeography and genecology of symbiotic Frankia and its host plants. Physiol Plant 130:318–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00934.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dawson JO. 1986. Actinorhizal plants: their use in forestry and agriculture. Outlook Agric 15:202–208. doi: 10.1177/003072708601500406. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chaia EE, Wall LG, Huss-Danell K. 2010. Life in soil by the actinorhizal root nodule endophyte Frankia. A review. Symbiosis 51:201–226. doi: 10.1007/s13199-010-0086-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Normand P, Orso S, Cournoyer B, Jeannin P, Chapelon C, Dawson J, Evtushenko L, Misra AK. 1996. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Frankia and related genera and emendation of the family Frankiaceae. Int J Syst Bacteriol 46:1–9. doi: 10.1099/00207713-46-1-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lechevalier MP. 1986. Catalog of Frankia strains. Actinomycete 19:131–162. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Normand P, Pujic P, Abrouk D, Vemulapally S, Guerra T, Carlos-Shanley C, Hahn D. 2022. Draft genomes of nitrogen-fixing Frankia strains Ag45/Mut15 and AgPM24 isolated from root nodules of Alnus glutinosa. J Genomics 10:49–56. doi: 10.7150/jgen.74788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Normand P, Pujic P, Abrouk D, Vemulapally S, Guerra T, Carlos-Shanley C, Hahn D. 2022. Draft genomes of symbiotic Frankia strains AgB32 and AgKG'84/4 from root nodules of Alnus glutinosa growing under contrasted environmental conditions. J Genomics 10:61–68. doi: 10.7150/jgen.75779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. 2020. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 70:e102. doi: 10.1002/cpbi.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. 2007. DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:81–91. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pritchard L, Glover RH, Humphris S, Elphinstone JG, Toth IK. 2016. Genomics and taxonomy in diagnostics for food security: soft-rotting enterobacterial plant pathogens. Anal Methods 8:12–24. doi: 10.1039/C5AY02550H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Raw reads were deposited to NCBI (SRA accession number SRX17215055). The genome sequence was deposited at GenBank (accession number JAMQQG000000000). Libraries and sequencing were done at the Microbial Genomics Sequencing Center.
