Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2022 Oct 13;11(11):e00440-22. doi: 10.1128/mra.00440-22

Whole-Genome Sequencing and Annotation of Fibrobacter succinogenes HC4, Isolated from the Horse Cecum

Alicia Froidurot a,, Emmanuel Jacotot a, Véronique Julliand a
Editor: David Raskob
PMCID: PMC9670992  PMID: 36227092

ABSTRACT

Fibrobacter succinogenes is a major cellulolytic bacterial species living in the large intestines of herbivores. This study reports the genome sequencing, assembly, and annotation of F. succinogenes HC4 (DSM 33656), a strain isolated from horse cecal contents. The genome comprised a total of 3.74 Mbp, with a G+C content of 48.96%.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Fibrobacter succinogenes plays a key role in host nutrition and health by degrading cellulose into short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) (15) in the digestive ecosystem. To date, cultured representatives of F. succinogenes living in the large intestines of mammals are lacking.

To isolate cellulolytic strains of F. succinogenes, samples were collected from one cecum-cannulated horse (6). Contents were stored at 38°C in CO2-saturated containers. Decimal dilutions were inoculated in a specific medium (7, 8). After 7 days of incubation at 38°C under CO2, the roll tube method (9) and the enrichment method (10) were used alternately to isolate strain HC4. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR using the universal primers 27f and 1492r. DNA amplification was achieved using the following program: denaturation for 4 min at 95°C; 35 cycles consisting of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 55°C, and 2 min at 72°C; and then 15 min at 72°C and 3 min at 30°C (11). PCR products were sequenced by Genewiz using the Sanger method. The 16S rRNA gene of strain HC4 (accession number OP018198) exhibited 99% sequence identity to those of F. succinogenes group V equine strains (10). For genome sequencing, DNA was extracted from a 48-h culture of F. succinogenes HC4 at 38°C under CO2 in Lowe medium (12) containing cellulose filter paper (13). The culture sample was concentrated and subjected to physical lysis using a bead beater (3 min at 25 Hz) and chemical lysis using a lysis buffer. After centrifugation for 5 min at 16,000 × g and treatment with 10 M ammonium acetate and 70% (v/v) ethanol, DNA was purified using the QIAamp stool minikit from Qiagen (catalog number 51504). The F. succinogenes genome was sequenced, assembled, and annotated by Genewiz. Libraries were constructed using the NEBNext Ultra II DNA library preparation kit for Illumina and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq sequencing platform (2 × 150 bp). A total of 13,163,761 raw reads were obtained and filtered with bcl2fastq v2.20.0 (14). Sequences of <30 bp were discarded. De novo assembly, with 50 scaffolds with an N50 value of 149,151 bp, was carried out using SPAdes v3.10.0 (k-mer values of 21, 33, 55, and 77) (15). The de novo assembled genome was created with a minimum contig length of 1,000 bp and analyzed statistically using QUAST v4.6 (16). Gene prediction and annotation were performed using Prokka v1.12 (17) with ISfinder, the NCBI Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance Reference Gene Database, and the UniProtKB database. Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified. The F. succinogenes HC4 genome comprised a total of 3.74 Mbp, with 3,143 coding sequences. The G+C content of the genome was 48.96%.

The HC4 strain of F. succinogenes will allow better characterization of the physiology and ecology of cellulolytic bacteria inhabiting the large intestines of mammals.

Data availability.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number JALCZV000000000 (BioProject accession number PRJNA812370), and the raw reads have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the SRA accession number SRR18517561. The version described in this paper is version JALCZV010000000. The sequence of the 16S rRNA gene of strain HC4 has been deposited under accession number OP018198.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work is part of the project Probio+: production et fonctionnalités innovantes 2019, supported by the Conseil Régional de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté and the European Union through the Programme Opérationnel FEDER-FSE Bourgogne 2014/2020 programs (European Regional Development Fund grant BG0026784).

We thank Edouard Meunier and Hélène Licandro for their advice and help regarding the procedure to deposit the genome in the NCBI database.

Contributor Information

Alicia Froidurot, Email: alicia.froidurot@agrosupdijon.fr.

David Rasko, University of Maryland School of Medicine.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Froidurot A, Julliand V. 2022. Cellulolytic bacteria in the large intestine of mammals. Gut Microbes 14:2031694. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2031694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Flint HJ, Scott KP, Duncan SH, Louis P, Forano E. 2012. Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gut. Gut Microbes 3:289–306. doi: 10.4161/gmic.19897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blaak EE, Canfora EE, Theis S, Frost G, Groen AK, Mithieux G, Nauta A, Scott K, Stahl B, van Harsselaar J, van Tol R, Vaughan EE, Verbeke K. 2020. Short chain fatty acids in human gut and metabolic health. Benef Microbes 11:411–455. doi: 10.3920/BM2020.0057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dalile B, van Oudenhove L, Vervliet B, Verbeke K. 2019. The role of short-chain fatty acids in microbiota–gut–brain communication. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 16:461–478. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0157-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.von Engelhardt W, Bartels J, Kirschberger S, zu Düttingdorf HDM, Busche R. 1998. Role of short-chain fatty acids in the hind gut. Vet Q 20:52–59. doi: 10.1080/01652176.1998.9694970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Grimm P, Combes S, Pascal G, Cauquil L, Julliand V. 2020. Dietary composition and yeast/microalgae combination supplementation modulate the microbial ecosystem in the caecum, colon and faeces of horses. Br J Nutr 123:372–382. doi: 10.1017/S0007114519002824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Halliwell G, Bryant MP. 1963. The cellulolytic activity of pure strains of bacteria from the rumen of cattle. J Gen Microbiol 32:441–448. doi: 10.1099/00221287-32-3-441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Julliand V, de Vaux A, Millet L, Fonty G. 1999. Identification of Ruminococcus flavefaciens as the predominant cellulolytic bacterial species of the equine cecum. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:3738–3741. doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.8.3738-3741.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hungate RE. 1969. Chapter IV: a roll tube method for cultivation of strict anaerobes. Methods Microbiol 3:117–132. doi: 10.1016/S0580-9517(08)70503-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Neumann AP, McCormick CA, Suen G. 2017. Fibrobacter communities in the gastrointestinal tracts of diverse hindgut-fermenting herbivores are distinct from those of the rumen. Environ Microbiol 19:3768–3783. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rousseaux S, Hartmann A, Soulas G. 2001. Isolation and characterisation of new Gram-negative and Gram-positive atrazine degrading bacteria from different French soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 36:211–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00842.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lowe SE, Theodorou MK, Trinci APJ, Hespell RB. 1985. Growth of anaerobic rumen fungi on defined and semi-defined media lacking rumen fluid. Microbiology (N Y) 131:2225–2229. doi: 10.1099/00221287-131-9-2225. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yu Z, Morrison M. 2004. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. Biotechniques 36:808–812. doi: 10.2144/04365ST04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brown J, Pirrung M, Mccue LA. 2017. FQC Dashboard: integrates FastQC results into a web-based, interactive, and extensible FASTQ quality control tool. Bioinformatics 33:3137–3139. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin A, Sirotkin A, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number JALCZV000000000 (BioProject accession number PRJNA812370), and the raw reads have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the SRA accession number SRR18517561. The version described in this paper is version JALCZV010000000. The sequence of the 16S rRNA gene of strain HC4 has been deposited under accession number OP018198.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES