Abstract
The plasmalemmal norepinephrine transporter (NET) regulates cardiovascular sympathetic activity by clearing extracellular norepinephrine in the synaptic cleft. Here, we investigate the subunit stoichiometry and function of NET using single-molecule fluorescence microscopy and flux assays. In particular, we show the effect of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) on NET oligomerization and efflux. NET forms monomers (~60%) and dimers (~40%) at the plasma membrane. PIP2 depletion results in a decrease in the average oligomeric state and decreases NET-mediated substrate efflux while not affecting substrate uptake. Mutation of the putative PIP2 binding residues R121, K334, and R440 to alanines does not affect NET dimerization but results in decreased substrate efflux that is not altered upon PIP2 depletion; this indicates that PIP2 interactions with these residues affect NET-mediated efflux. A dysregulation of norepinephrine and PIP2 signaling have both been implicated in neuropsychiatric and cardiovascular diseases. This study provides evidence that PIP2 directly regulates NET organization and function.
Subject terms: Single-molecule biophysics, Transporters in the nervous system, Total internal reflection microscopy
Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) directly regulates norepinephrine transporter (NET) dimer stabilization at the plasma membrane. Furthermore, PIP2 interaction with NET affects efflux.
Introduction
The human norepinephrine transporter (hNET) regulates noradrenergic signal transduction by high-affinity uptake of norepinephrine from the synaptic cleft. NET belongs to the sodium- and chloride-dependent solute carrier (SLC) 6 family transporters (SLC6A2 gene1), which also include the monoamine transporters for dopamine (DAT; SLC6A3) and serotonin (SERT; SLC6A4)2. In addition to its expression in the central nervous system, NET is expressed in the peripheral nervous system, adrenal glands, and the placenta2,3. NET has opposing effects on cardiovascular sympathetic regulation in the brain and in the periphery and modulates the distribution of sympathetic activity between vasculature, heart, and kidney4. Moreover, NET is an important target of a variety of prescription drugs2 and drugs of abuse5. Impaired cardiac NET function has been associated with several cardiac health conditions, such as congestive heart failure4. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the NET gene have been linked to orthostatic intolerance and major depression6–8. Even though depression is considered a heterogenous disease, various symptoms are specifically attributed to the norepinephrine system9,10. Mental disorders are a large and growing social and economic burden11; however, the efficacy of current treatment options is far from optimal, with up to 30% of patients suffering from depression not responding to conventional treatments12. The need for a better understanding of disease mechanisms and the development of more efficacious treatments is therefore evident.
Monoamine transporter regulation and function is driven by the interplay of various kinases, proteins, and lipids13–15. An imbalance of such biomolecules may result in transporter malfunction and subsequent disease. An important role in monoamine transporter function and quaternary organization has been attributed to the phospholipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2)16–20. PIP2 is present in the intracellular leaflet of the plasma membrane and constitutes around 2% of the inner leaflet lipid composition19. Besides its importance in the second messenger pathway, PIP2 regulates membrane proteins21, including ion channels22–27, receptors28, and transporters16,18,20. Hitherto, however, it remains unknown to which extent PIP2 modulates NET function and organization. Interestingly, altered PIP2 and norepinephrine signaling have both been associated with several diseases, including neurological diseases such as bipolar disorder or Alzheimer’s disease29–34; this manifests the need for further investigation of this lipid-protein connection.
PIP2 kinetically traps SERT but not DAT oligomers at the plasma membrane17,19,35,36. PIP2 depletion or mutation of the PIP2 binding sites K352 and K460 to uncharged residues causes equilibration of the different higher-order SERT oligomers17. Monoamine transporter oligomerization has been proposed to be a trafficking quality control mechanism37 and to be a prerequisite for drug-induced neurotransmitter efflux38. Furthermore, DAT oligomerization was suggested to play a role in cocaine tolerance development39 and to be involved in clathrin-independent endocytosis and subsequent endosomal retention of DAT in cells exposed to the activated CDC42 kinase 1 (Ack1) inhibitor AIM-10040. In DAT, PIP2 was demonstrated to interact with the arginine residue R443 on intracellular loop 4, which electrostatically regulates dopamine efflux in coordination with the N-terminus18,41. Similarly, the action of substrate-type serotonergic stimulants depends on the binding of PIP2 to SERT16. Specifically, the cytoplasmic residues K352 on intracellular loop 3, K460 on intracellular loop 4, and to a lesser extent R144 on intracellular loop 1 have been identified to interact with PIP216.
Here, we examined the subunit stoichiometry of NET on a single-molecule level and assessed the effect of PIP2 on NET oligomerization and transporter kinetics. Single-molecule imaging is typically not feasible when fluorescently labeled proteins are expressed at high densities. To overcome this issue, we applied a method referred to as “thinning out clusters while conserving stoichiometry of labeling” (TOCCSL42, Fig. 1a) to determine the oligomeric state of NET. In TOCCSL, a rectangular area of the bottom cell membrane is irreversibly photobleached by a high-intensity laser pulse. Subsequently, unbleached molecules enter the bleached area by Brownian motion. During the onset of fluorescence recovery, individual fluorescence spots can be monitored. The brightness of these spots is then compared to the brightness of a single mGFP-NET molecule to determine the oligomeric distribution. To further elucidate the involvement of PIP2, we studied the putative PIP2 binding sites R121, K334, and R440, which correspond to R144, K352, and K460, respectively, in SERT17. Specifically, we mutated the residues to uncharged alanines with the aim of diminishing interactions with the negatively charged PIP2. Moreover, we studied the oligomerization of the NET variant A457P; this variant has been linked to orthostatic intolerance and oligomeric complexes between mutant and wildtype have been proposed as explanation for severe NET dysfunction in heterozygous subjects8,43. With this study, we therefore aimed to shed more light on processes that drive NET regulation in order to facilitate the development of novel therapeutic strategies for disease states and conditions related to NET. Examination of NET oligomerization, and the processes that regulate it, helps to comprehend the role of quaternary transporter arrangement in transporter function and stimulant drug action. We found evidence that PIP2 directly affects the quaternary organization of NET at the plasma membrane by stabilizing dimers. Our data furthermore suggest that PIP2 modulates substrate efflux but not uptake. Enhanced knowledge of NET regulation will therefore contribute to a better understanding of NET-associated diseases.
Results
NET molecules co-exist as monomers and dimers at the plasma membrane of live cells
The brightness distribution plotted as a probability density function (PDF) derived from TOCCSL experiments is shown in Fig. 1b, revealing the co-existence of monomers (~60%) and dimers (~40%) at the plasma membrane (Fig. 1c). Single-molecule experiments were performed on live Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected with mGFP-hNET. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) of ten cells yielded a mobile fraction of 89 ± 2% (95% CI) for mGFP-hNET molecules located at the plasma membrane (Fig. 2a). Analyzed by nonparametric Spearman correlation, the average oligomeric state correlated with transporter densities (Spearman r: 0.19, P [two-tailed] < 0.01; Fig. 2b). To assess whether wildtype NET dimers exchange subunits over time, 20 cells were repeatedly imaged 3 times in 10-min intervals, based on previous studies17,36. The following two scenarios could occur: i) if there were no subunit exchange, the same distribution would be obtained for each run, albeit with a decrease in the amount of active fluorophores as dimers get bleached during each run (Fig. 2c; i). ii) In case bleached and unbleached dimers would exchange subunits, the subunit distribution would shift to an increasing proportion of apparent monomers, which in part are dimers consisting of a bleached and an unbleached molecule (Fig. 2c; ii). The repeated TOCCSL experiments suggest that wildtype NET dimers do engage in subunit exchange (Fig. 2d). After 20 min, the apparent average oligomeric state was significantly decreased (Fig. 2e), indicating the presence of dimers consisting of a bleached and an unbleached molecule. The number of active fluorophores in the field of view was decreased by 64% and 80% after 10 and 20 min, respectively.
PIP2 stabilizes NET dimers whereas cholesterol does not affect NET oligomerization
To shed more light on the potential role of lipid plasma membrane components in wildtype NET oligomerization, plasma membrane cholesterol and PIP2 levels were manipulated. Cholesterol was either oxidized with 2 U/mL cholesterol oxidase (CholOx) or depleted with 10 mM methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD). However, neither oxidation nor depletion of cholesterol affected wildtype NET oligomerization (Fig. 3a, b and Supplementary Fig. 1a–d). Additionally, the direct PLC activator m-3M3FBS was used to deplete the plasma membrane of PIP2. Compared to its inactive analogue o-3M3FBS, m-3M3FBS induced a noticeable but not complete dissociation of wildtype NET dimers (Fig. 3c), resulting in a statistically significant decrease in the average oligomeric state (Fig. 3d). Transporter densities at the plasma membrane were the same for both treatments, which excludes a difference in density as the explanation for the observed decrease in average oligomerization after m-3M3FBS treatment (Fig. 3e). The difference between both treatment conditions was more distinct at lower transporter densities (Supplementary Fig. 1e, f).
Interactions of PIP2 with residues R121, K334, and R440 are not crucial for NET dimer stabilization
To assess whether the NET residues R121, K334, and R440 stabilize NET dimers through binding to PIP2, they were mutated to uncharged alanine residues with the aim of diminishing interactions with the negatively charged PIP2. Intracellular retaining of NET-R121A/K334A/R440A (NET-RKR/AAA) was comparable to wildtype NET (Supplementary Figs. 2, 3) and importantly, also surface expression of cells used for imaging was the same (Fig. 4e). Compared to wildtype, the RKR/AAA mutant had a slightly decreased mobile fraction of 76% (95% CI: 74–78%). To get insight into how the RKR/AAA mutation may affect electrostatic interactions with PIP2, both NET model structures (wildtype and the RKR/AAA mutant) were analyzed using the adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann solver (APBS). The obtained electric field showed that the positive electric field around the protein’s intracellular side is only slightly affected by the mutation (Fig. 4a). In accordance with this finding, TOCCSL experiments revealed that the oligomerization of the RKR/AAA mutant is indifferent from wildtype (Fig. 4c–e).
The orthostatic intolerance-associated NET variant A457P forms dimers
The NET variant A457P is associated with orthostatic intolerance and displays significantly decreased substrate transport and surface expression compared to wildtype8,43. The alanine to proline mutation is located on transmembrane helix 9 and causes a distinct change in the secondary structure43. Previous studies showed that NET-A457P co-immunoprecipitates with wildtype NET43. In the present study, we studied the oligomerization of the A457P mutant on a single-molecule level in live cells. The mobile fraction of the A457P mutant was 89% (95% CI: 88–91%) and therefore equal to wildtype. Despite a high proportion of NET-A457P being retained within the cell (Supplementary Fig. 4), the membrane expression was sufficient for TOCCSL runs in total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) mode. In accordance with previous co-immunoprecipitation studies, TOCCSL runs revealed that the A457P mutant forms dimers at the plasma membrane (Fig. 4f). Transporter densities of the imaged cells as well as the average oligomeric state of the A457P mutant were statistically indifferent from wildtype (Fig. 4g, h).
PIP2 modulates NET-mediated substrate efflux but not uptake in vitro
PIP2 plays an important role in various cellular processes; among other effects, it modulates SERT-mediated substrate efflux16 and DAT-related amphetamine behavior (i.e., psychomotor and rewarding properties) in Drosophila melanogaster18. Currently, it is mostly unknown how PIP2 affects NET function. Pretreatment with 25 µM m-3M3FBS did not significantly alter single-point uptake, substrate saturation, or plasma membrane expression of wildtype NET when compared to pretreatment with o-3M3FBS (Supplementary Fig. 5a–d). Compared to wildtype, basal uptake of the RKR/AAA and A457P mutants was decreased by 64% and 95%, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 5a). As for wildtype, PIP2 depletion did not affect single-point uptake or substrate saturation of the mutants (Supplementary Fig. 5a, b). In contrast to substrate uptake, PIP2 depletion substantially decreased d-methamphetamine-induced substrate efflux of wildtype NET (Fig. 3f, g and Supplementary Fig. 6a). The RKR/AAA mutant displayed a 69% decreased efflux, which was not affected by PIP2 depletion (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 6b). These results are in line with studies showing that PIP2 depletion decreases substrate-induced efflux but not uptake in DAT18 and SERT16. The A457P mutant did not mediate any substrate efflux (Supplementary Fig. 6c). An overview of substrate efflux for all time points and conditions is provided in Supplementary Table 1. For the functional characterization of NET, we utilized human embryonic kidney (HEK)-hNET cells as done in previous studies16,35,36. PIP2 levels in mGFP-hNET-transfected CHO and HEK 293 cells were statistically indistinguishable, justifying the use of different cell lines (Supplementary Fig. 7).
Discussion
NET regulates the cardiovascular sympathetic activity and is a key target of various psychoactive substances. Genetic or acquired deficits in NET-mediated norepinephrine inactivation may result in hyperadrenergic states. To advance our understanding of NET organization and function, this study examined NET oligomerization on a single-molecule level. Previous studies revealed differences between the oligomerization of DAT36 and SERT17,35. Namely, the two transporters differed regarding their subunit distribution. Here, we report the presence of NET dimers at the plasma membrane of live cells measured by single-molecule microscopy. A high degree of mobile NET molecules corroborates the applicability of the TOCCSL approach. Our results are in line with co-immunoprecipitation experiments showing the presence of NET homodimers44. We found that the subunit distributions of NET and DAT are virtually identical but differ from the distribution of SERT through the absence of higher-order oligomers. All monoamine transporters share a high degree of sequence identity but the two catecholamine transporters NET and DAT are the most similar with 72% sequence identity of their respective transmembrane domains2,45. An identical oligomeric pattern for DAT and NET is therefore not unexpected. Extensive molecular dynamics simulations revealed that all transmembrane helices of DAT can contribute to dimer interfaces except the bundle domain46. It is therefore possible that the same applies for NET dimer interfaces.
Cell membrane lipids including cholesterol and PIP2 play crucial roles in monoamine transporter oligomerization and function15–20,36,41,47–49. Still, the effects of cell membrane lipids on DAT and SERT oligomerization differ17,19,36. It is currently mostly unknown how cell membrane lipids affect NET organization and function. Plasma membrane cholesterol facilitates tighter packing of the hydrocarbon chains, resulting in lower lateral mobility of lipids and an increase in membrane thickness49,50. Perturbation of membrane cholesterol may result in distinct changes in the organization of clustered proteins or the dimerization of mobile components51. Moreover, membrane cholesterol modulates conformation, pharmacology, and kinetics of monoamine transporters47,48,52. Hence, we manipulated cholesterol levels to examine whether cholesterol-rich liquid-ordered membrane phases are involved in the formation of NET dimers. However, our study showed that neither oxidation nor depletion of membrane cholesterol affects NET dimerization. Whereas cholesterol levels do not contribute to oligomer stabilization for either NET or DAT, the most striking difference between NET and DAT oligomerization is the stabilization of NET dimers by PIP2. Nonetheless, in contrast to SERT oligomerization17, the residual exchange of NET subunits suggests that PIP2 does not completely kinetically trap NET dimers at the plasma membrane. Rather, NET oligomerization at the cell membrane resembles the behavior of SERT oligomers at the endoplasmic reticulum17. It needs to be considered that the evanescent field of TIRF illumination penetrates into the sample to a depth of about 100 nm; thereby, it potentially excites fluorophores at the endoplasmic reticulum in addition to those at the cell membrane (Supplementary Fig. 8). Compared to SERT, the proportion of intracellularly retained NET, and therefore the contribution of endoplasmic NET to the observed results, may be distinctively higher. Furthermore, it needs to be considered that the degree of subunit exchange might be slightly overestimated due to partial bleaching of dimers during repetitive runs. Still, previous studies indicate that partial bleaching does not substantially affect the results17,36.
Altered norepinephrine and PIP2 signaling have both been associated with neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders53,54. Here, we provide evidence that PIP2 modulates NET organization and function. For a better understanding of the importance of PIP2 for NET function, we assessed its role in NET-mediated substrate uptake and efflux. Previous studies showed that PIP2 affects DAT and SERT-mediated substrate efflux but not substrate uptake16,18,20. Similarly, our in vitro results show that PIP2 does not affect substrate uptake by NET, while PIP2 depletion affects NET-mediated substrate efflux. As m-3M3FBS decreases only a part of the membrane PIP216, it remains unresolved whether complete depletion of PIP2 would further decrease NET-mediated efflux. As alternative approach to pharmacological PIP2 depletion, we aimed to reduce interactions of PIP2 with potential binding sites of NET by mutation. For SERT, we have previously identified residues K352 and K460, and to a lesser extent R144, as PIP2 binding sites involved in the stabilization of SERT higher-order oligomers17 and in substrate-induced efflux16. Similarly, the electrostatic interaction of PIP2 with R443 in DAT, which corresponds to K460 in SERT, has been shown to regulate dopamine efflux18. We therefore focused on the NET residues R121, K334, and R440, which correspond to R144, K352, and K460, respectively, in SERT. We mutated the positively charged residues of interest to uncharged alanines, thereby diminishing interactions with the negatively charged PIP2. The RKR/AAA mutant displayed a decreased efflux; yet, the oligomerization of wildtype NET and the RKR/AAA mutant was indifferent. We used electrostatic field analysis to better understand the interaction of PIP2 with R121, K334, and R440 in NET. A triple mutation of analogous residues to alanines resulted in a distinct change of the electrostatic potential in SERT, reducing the attractive force for PIP2 binding16. For NET, our electrostatic field analysis suggests that the electrostatic field remains relatively unchanged and the remaining positively charged residues located at the inner side of the transporter can compensate the effect of the mutation to a certain degree (Fig. 4a). Specifically, the residues K61, K62, K254, K257, K261, R341, K443, R512, R518, and K522 all contribute to the positively charged rim that may interact with PIP2. This suggests that the RKR/AAA mutant and wildtype NET are similarily sensitive to PIP2 depletion. Despite the small change in the electrostatic field, substrate efflux mediated by the RKR/AAA mutant was substantially lower than for wildtype NET. Moreover, in contrast to wildtype, PIP2 depletion did not significantly affect substrate efflux for the RKR/AAA mutant. Taken together, this indicates that reduced interactions of the RKR/AAA mutant with PIP2 are, at least in part, the cause of the decreased efflux. This therefore strengthens the hypothesis that the residues R121, K334, and R440 engage in PIP2 binding, thereby supporting specific NET conformations required for substrate-induced efflux.
Oligomeric complexes between wildtype NET and the disease variant A457P have been hypothesized to account for severe NET dysfunction in heterozygous subjects. The alanine to proline missense mutation in transmembrane helix 9 adds a kink into the secondary structure of NET and has been linked to orthostatic intolerance8,43. NET-A457P displays an overall reduced surface expression and a drastically reduced substrate transport43. The oligomerization of the A457P variant has so far not been studied. In accordance with previous studies43, we measured substantially reduced substrate uptake and consequently no d-methamphetamine-induced efflux. Importantly, our study revealed that at comparable transporter densities, the subunit distribution of the A457P mutant does not deviate from wildtype. Hence, this fuels the hypothesis that oligomeric complexes between wildtype NET and the A457P mutant are the underlining mechanism for severe NET dysfunction in heterozygous subjects suffering from orthostatic intolerance.
The physiological role of NET oligomerization still remains enigmatic. Transporter function is affected by many different factors and the contribution by the quaternary structure of the transporter remains unclear. NET oligomerization may pose a mechanism to modulate norepinephrine efflux induced by sympathomimetic agents or to control NET trafficking. Future research should focus on the different biophysical properties of NET dimers compared to monomers (e.g., bulkiness and slower diffusion) and their role in the spatial arrangement of NET.
In summary, we show that PIP2 affects the cardiovascular system by modulating the quaternary organization and efflux function of NET in addition to regulating vascular ion channels. Altered norepinephrine and PIP2 signaling have been implicated in various neurological and neuropsychiatric diseases. Linking PIP2 to NET organization and function provides further insights into disease etiology. NET oligomerization shares some similarities and some differences with the other monoamine transporters. Differences exist in the subunit stoichiometry and the stability of the individual transporter oligomers. The two catecholamine transporters NET and DAT both form monomers (~60%) and dimers (~40%) at the plasma membrane; however, compared to DAT, NET dimers are more dynamic and exchange subunits on the time scale of minutes. This manifests in subunit exchange, transporter density dependence, and dimer dissociation under PIP2-depleted conditions. SERT is the only monoamine transporter that forms higher-order oligomers, which are stabilized by PIP2 as well. The present study therefore demonstrates that the oligomerization behavior of each monoamine transporter has unique features. Unlike its effect on oligomerization, the effect of PIP2 on transporter kinetics is similar for all monoamine transporters. Transporter-mediated substrate efflux is modulated through interactions of PIP2 with positively charged residues on intracellular loop 4; decreased PIP2 levels result in decreased efflux.
Material and Methods
Materials availability
Plasmids generated in this study have been made available at addgene.org and carry the following IDs: 193364 (mGFP-hNET), 193365 (mGFP-hNET- A457P), and 193366 (mGFP-hNET- R121A/K334A/R440A).
Plasmids
A monomeric version of green fluorescent protein (mGFP; FPbase ID: QKFJN) was prepared by A206K mutation of enhanced GFP35,55. Human NET was cloned to a vector expressing mGFP via EcoRI/BamHI, resulting in a fusion protein of hNET with mGFP linked to the N-terminus. The A457P and R121A/K334A/R440A mutations were introduced into the mGFP-hNET plasmid using the Quikchange Lightning Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (cat#: 210518, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The following primers were obtained from Microsynth AG (Balgach, Switzerland): forward primer A457P: 5’-CAGCACTTTCCTTCTCCCCCTGTTCTGCATAAC-3’; reverse primer A457P: 5’-GTTATGCAGAACAGGGGGAGAAGGAAAGTGCTG-3’; forward primer R121A: 5’-TGGGACAGTACAACGCGGAGGGGGCTGCC-3’; reverse primer R121A: 5’-GGCAGCCCCCTCCGCGTTGTACTGTCCCA-3’; forward primer R334A: 5’-TGATTGCATTTGCCAGTTACAACGCATTTGACAACAACTGTTACAGGG-3’; reverse primer R334A: 5’-CCCTGTAACAGTTGTTGTCAAATGCGTTGTAACTGGCAAATGCAATCA-3’; forward primer R440A: 5’-CTTCCAGGTCCTGAAGGCACACCGGAAACTCTTC-3’; reverse primer R440A: 5’-GAAGAGTTTCCGGTGTGCCTTCAGGACCTGGAAG-3’. All plasmids were sequenced before use.
Cell culture
CHO cells (cat#: 85050302, Sigma-Aldrich, Vienna, Austria) were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in Dulbecco′s Modified Eagle′s Medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12 Ham (cat#: D8437, Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; cat#: F7524, Sigma-Aldrich), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (cat#: P4333, Sigma-Aldrich). HEK 293T cells (cat#: HCL4517, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vienna, Austria) were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in Dulbecco′s Modified Eagle′s Medium (4.5 g/L glucose and 584 mg/L L-glutamine [cat#: L0102, Biowest, Nuaillé, France]) supplemented with 10% FBS (cat#: FBS-11A, Capricorn Scientific, Ebsdorfergrund, Germany), 100 U/mL of penicillin, and 100 µg/mL of streptomycin. Cell lines were regularly tested for mycoplasma contamination using MycoAlert Mycoplasma Detection Kit and MycoAlert Assay Control Set (cat#: LT07-418 and LT07-518, respectively, Lonza, Basel, Switzerland).
Transfections
The plasmids were transfected into CHO cells using TurboFect Transfection Reagent (cat#: R0531, Thermo Fisher Scientific). 24 h prior to transfection, 80,000 cells in 4 mL culture medium were seeded into a well of a 6-well plate. 4 µg of DNA were diluted in 400 µL of reduced serum medium (Gibco OptiMEM; cat#: 31985062, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 8 µL of transfection reagent were added. After 20 min incubation at room temperature, the mixture was added dropwise to the cells. The plate was gently rocked and then incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 48 h. Thereafter, the culture medium was replaced with medium containing the selection antibiotic G418 (800 µg/mL; cat#: G418-B, Capricorn Scientific). After ten days, the cells were frozen until further use. Uptake experiments were performed in HEK 293T cells transiently transfected with polyethyleneimine (linear, molecular weight: ~25,000; cat#: sc-507213, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA). 2,500,000 cells were seeded into a 10-cm cell culture dish. The following day, 8 µg DNA and 24 µg polyethyleneimine were diluted in 1 mL serum-free growth medium, vortexed, and incubated for 15 min at room temperature. The mixture was then added to the cells.
Sample preparation
For single-molecule and FRAP microscopy experiments, 8-chamber Nunc Lab-Tek #1.0 borosilicate coverglass systems were used (cat#: 155411, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The chambers were sterilized with 70% isopropanol and coated with fibronectin bovine plasma (cat#: F1141, Sigma-Aldrich) for 20 min at 37 °C. Thereafter, the chambers were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (cat#: D8537; Sigma-Aldrich). The cells were detached with accutase solution (cat#: A6964, Sigma-Aldrich) for 4 min at 37 °C; 50,000 cells resuspended in 500 µL cell culture medium were then seeded into each well. After 12–16 h, the cell culture medium was replaced with imaging buffer (2% FBS in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution [cat#: H8264, Sigma-Aldrich]) and the samples were measured.
For confocal microscopy, transfected CHO cells were seeded into a poly-D-lysine-coated (0.05 mg/mL; cat#: P1149, Sigma-Aldrich) 29-mm glass-bottom dish with 20-mm micro-well #1.5 cover glass (cat#: D29-20-1.5-N, Cellvis, Mountain View, CA, USA) at a density of 100,000 cells per dish. The following day, the culture medium was removed and the cells were incubated for 10 min with 10 nM of the nisoxetine-based fluorescent probe AC1-14656 diluted in Krebs-HEPES buffer (KHB: 25 mM HEPES, 120 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1.2 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgSO4, and 5 mM D-glucose, pH 7.3) at room temperature.
Cholesterol oxidation and depletion
For membrane cholesterol oxidation, the samples were incubated with 2 U/mL cholesterol oxidase (cat#: C8649, Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in imaging buffer for 30 min at 37 °C. For cholesterol depletion, the samples were incubated with 10 mM MβCD (cat#: C4555, Sigma-Aldrich) in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution for 30 min at 37 °C. After incubation, the samples were transferred to the microscope and measured immediately without the replacement of the incubation buffer.
PIP2 depletion
PIP2 levels were depleted with the specific PLC activator 2,4,6-trimethyl-N-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]benzenesulfonamide (m-3M3FBS; cat#: T5699, Sigma-Aldrich). For single-molecule microscopy, the cells were either incubated with 25 µM of m-3M3FBS or its inactive ortho analog o-3M3FBS (cat#: sc-204142, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 20 min at 37 °C in imaging buffer. After incubation, the samples were transferred to the microscope and measured immediately without the replacement of the incubation buffer. For radiotracer experiments, the cells were incubated with 25 µM m-3M3FBS or o-3M3FBS for 10 min.
Single-molecule microscopy
Single-molecule microscopy was conducted based on earlier studies17,35,36. Fluorophores were excited with 488-nm light originating from a directly modulated diode laser (LBX-488, installed in L6Cc laser combiner; Oxxius, Lannion, France). The illumination intensity and timing were adjusted using custom-written software in LabVIEW (National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA). The laser beam was focused onto the back-focal plane of a Plan-Apochromat objective (100x/1.46 NA; Zeiss, Jena, Germany) mounted on an inverted Zeiss Axiovert 200 microscope. The emission light was filtered using appropriate emission filter sets (FF01-538/685-25; Semrock, Rochester, NY, USA, and zt488/640rpc; Chroma, Bellows Falls, VT, USA) and imaged onto a back-illuminated charge-coupled device camera (LNCCD1300-PB, Roper Scientific, Planegg, Germany), cooled to -110 °C with liquid nitrogen. A slit aperture (Owis, Staufen im Breisgau, Germany) was used to restrict the excitation and photobleaching area. Stroboscopic illumination with excitation times of 5 ms (texp) was used. The samples were excited and bleached in TIRF mode. All experiments were performed at room temperature.
Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching
The mobile fraction of mGFP-hNET and both mutants was assessed by FRAP. An area of ~50 µm2 of the bottom plasma membrane was photobleached in TIRF mode and fluorescence recovery was measured every 10 s during a total recording time of 400 s. Data were fitted by a one-phase association curve (Equ. 1), where I0 represents the fluorescence signal before photobleaching, I(t) the fluorescence signal at time t, mf the mobile fraction, and K the recovery rate constant.
1 |
Thinning out clusters while conserving stoichiometry of labelling (TOCCSL)
The TOCCSL protocol was adapted from previous studies17,35,36. For each run, a prebleach image was recorded and used to assess the surface density of mGFP-hNET. 50 ms after recording the prebleach image, an aperture-confined region of the bottom plasma membrane was photobleached for 2,000 ms (tbl) with a laser intensity of ~2 kW/cm2 (Ibl). After a recovery time of 5,000 ms, the TOCCSL image was acquired with an excitation laser intensity of 0.4–0.6 kW/cm2 (Iim). To assess the brightness of a single mGFP-hNET molecule, cells were repeatedly bleached for 200 ms with a laser intensity of ~2 kW/cm2; this substantially reduced the amount of active fluorophores, so that each NET oligomer contained a maximum of one active fluorophore35. These individual signals can be assumed to represent a pure monomeric fraction and were used for calculating the single mGFP brightness distribution. All laser intensities were determined in epifluorescence configuration. To assess whether NET oligomerization depends on transporter density, the transporter density of a total of 261 cells was plotted against the average oligomeric state of NET. The transporter density was calculated using the average fluorescence brightness of the prebleach image divided by the single-molecule brightness. To assess whether different NET dimers exchange subunits, three repetitive TOCCSL runs were performed on the same cell in 10-min intervals. The average oligomeric state of NET molecules of each cell after 10 and 20 min was compared to start conditions.
Single-molecule brightness analysis
TOCCSL images were analyzed in MATLAB (Mathworks, Portola Valley, CA, USA) using an in-house algorithm. The pixel counts were converted to photon counts by offset subtraction and multiplying with the inverse gain (as per specification of the Roper camera). The individual diffraction-limited fluorescent signals from the regions of interest were fitted by a Gaussian function. The fitting routine yielded the single spot brightness B, which was then used to determine the oligomeric state of the mGFP–labeled constructs. The brightness values of all single spot signals obtained in the TOCCSL images were then plotted as a probability density function, ρ(B). Using autoconvolution, the monomer brightness distribution ρ1(B) was used to calculate the brightness distributions for dimers, ρ2(B), and for higher-order oligomers. The overall single spot brightness distribution ρ(B) was then fitted by a linear combination of ρ1(B), ρ2(B), and higher-order oligomers (Equ. 2).
2 |
Fitting ρ(B) yielded the fractions αn of the different oligomeric states of co-diffusing transporter molecules with active mGFP molecules. A bootstrapping method was applied to calculate the standard deviations of each analysis. For this, random subsamples containing 50% of the data were analyzed in 100 repetitions.
Confocal microscopy
Confocal images were recorded to assess the proportion of cell membrane expression of wildtype NET and mutants. The cell sample dish was mounted above a 60x oil immersion objective on a Nikon A1R+ laser scanning confocal microscope system (Nikon, Minato City, Tokyo, Japan). Images were acquired using a resonant scanner. The nisoxetine-based fluorescent probe AC1-146 and trypan blue solution were excited by a 561-nm laser line; mGFP was excited by a 488-nm laser line. A 525/50 nm and a 595/50 nm emission filter were used. The emitted light was collected with a high-sensitivity GaAsP detector. To assess NET internalization after PIP2 depletion, the ratio between plasma membrane fluorescence (FPM) and cytosolic fluorescence (FCyt) was determined with ImageJ software57. The regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn in the 561-nm channel where the stained plasma membrane was clearly visible. Total fluorescence was calculated by multiplying the area and average fluorescence of each ROI in the 488-nm channel after background subtraction.
Radiotracer experiments
Substrate saturation was determined in HEK 293T cells transiently transfected with mGFP-hNET. The cells were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline and detached with Trypsin-EDTA solution (cat#: T3924, Sigma-Aldrich). 24 h prior to the experiment, the cells were seeded onto poly-D-lysine-coated 96-well culture plates at a density of 200,000 cells/mL and grown as monolayers. After pretreatment with 25 µM m-3M3FBS, 25 µM o-3M3FBS, or vehicle control for 10 min, the cells were incubated in 50 μL of KHB containing 0.3–100 μM 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+; cat#: D048, Sigma-Aldrich) for 3 min at room temperature. The dilution row was prepared by mixing various concentrations of non-tritiated MPP+ with 20 nM [3H]MPP+ (80–85 μCi mmol−1; American Radiolabeled Chemicals, St. Louis, MO, USA). Unspecific uptake was determined in the presence of 50 µM GBR12909 (cat#: D052, Sigma-Aldrich). Afterwards, 200 μL of Ultima Gold XR scintillation cocktail (cat#: 6013329, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) was added, the plates were shaken, and tritiated substrate uptake was determined with a Wallac 1450 MicroBeta TriLux liquid scintillation counter (GMI, Ramsey, MN, USA). In addition to substrate saturation curves, single-point uptake was assessed as follows: cells expressing the protein of interest were washed with 200 μL of KHB and treated with 25 μM m-3M3FBS, 25 μM o-3M3FBS, or vehicle control for 10 min. Uptake was then assessed by exposing the cells to 20 nM [3H]MPP+ for 3 min. Non-specific uptake was determined in the presence of 50 µM GBR12909.
To assess NET-mediated substrate efflux, transporter-transfected cells were seeded onto poly-D-lysine coated 96-well plates at a density of 60,000 cells per well in a final volume of 200 µL. After 24 h, the cells were preloaded with 50 nM [3H]MPP+ dissolved in KHB for 20 min at 37 °C. Subsequently, the cells were washed three times with KHB and equilibrated for 10 min. Thereafter, the cells were incubated with 25 µM m-3M3FBS, 25 µM o-3M3FBS, or vehicle control for 10 min. Basal efflux was assessed during 6 min before substrate-induced efflux was initiated with 10 µM d-methamphetamine (cat#: M8750, Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min. The supernatant was transferred to another 96-well plate and 200 µL Ultima Gold XR scintillation cocktail were added to the cells and supernatant. Radioactivity in the cells and supernatant was assessed with a Wallac 1450 MicroBeta TriLux Liquid Scintillation Counter. [3H]MPP+ release was expressed as percentage of the total radioactivity in cells and supernatant normalized to the basal efflux. Nonspecific release was determined in the presence of 30 µM nisoxetine (cat#: N151, Sigma-Aldrich).
In silico modelling
As the structure of hNET is currently not known, we created a model based on the homologous outward-open hSERT crystal structure (PDB ID: 5I71)58, which has a sequence identity of 54% for the transmembrane domain. Homology modelling was performed with MODELLER 9.2059,60. Two sodium ions as well as a chloride ion were placed by MODELLER to their respective binding sites. Based on the available structural information and previous experience with SERT and DAT models, the glutamate residue 488 was protonated. The best model based on the DOPE score was used as wildtype and mutated (R121A, K334A, and R440A) to obtain the RKR/AAA mutant model. The homology models were used as the input for electrostatic field analysis using the adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann solver (APBS)61,62. Cytoplasmic and side view of a homology model of the RKR/AAA mutant are provided in Supplementary Fig. 9.
Mass spectrometry
Phosphatidylinositol phosphates were prepared as reported by Clark and co-workers63. In short, lipids were extracted by an acidic Folch extraction and derivatized employing TMS-diazomethane. After removal of excess reagent, methylated 18:0-20:4 PI(4,5)P2 was measured employing an untargeted lipidomics workflow in positive polarization mode on a Bruker timsTOF Pro equipped with a VIP-HESI source (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, United States). The frontend was a Thermo Fisher Scientific Vanquish H UHPLC with a Waters Acquity BEH C18 column (150 mm × 1 mm × 1.7 µm; Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). Mobile phase A was 60% acetonitrile in 20 mM ammonium formate; mobile phase B was 10% acetonitrile in isopropanol supplemented with 10 mM ammonium formate. The following gradient was employed at a constant flow rate of 70 µL/min and 40 °C: 0 min; 2% B, 7 min; 2% B, 20 min; 100% B, 25 min; 100% B, followed by 5 min re-equilibration to starting conditions. 18:0-20:4 PI(4,5)P2 was quantified on MS1 level employing Bruker Compass DataAnalysis Version 5.3. Mass-to-charge, retention time, and CCS were matched to an authentic standard (18:0-20:4 PI[4,5]P2; cat#: 850165, Avanti Lipids, Birmingham, AL, USA).
Statistics and reproducibility
Data were fitted and statistically analyzed with GraphPad Prism (version 9.3.1, San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical significance was determined as P < 0.05. To determine the subunit stoichiometry of NET, 10–15 cells per condition and day were measured on 5 different days. Average oligomerization under the different conditions was compared using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test. A total of 261 cells were measured to assess whether NET dimerization depends on transporter density. Two-tailed nonparametric Spearman correlation was computed to assess the correlation between the average oligomeric state and transporter density. 20 cells were repeatedly measured to examine subunit exchange of NET dimers. The average oligomeric state of NET molecules of each cell after 10 and 20 min was compared to start conditions by the Friedman test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison posthoc test. Batch release experiments were compared using the Mann-Whitney test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison posthoc test. Substrate-induced efflux was assessed in five independent experiments performed in duplicate. Efflux curves were compared by two-way ANOVA, corrected for multiple comparisons using the Holm-Sidak method. Uptake was assessed in three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Single-point uptake after treatment with m-3M3FBS was compared to o-3M3FBS and vehicle control using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison posthoc test. To assess NET internalization after PIP2 depletion, the ratio between mGFP fluorescence at the plasma membrane (FPM) and cytosolic fluorescence (FCyt) of 30 cells was compared with a two-tailed Student’s t-test. PIP2 levels in CHO and HEK 293T cells were assessed in quadruplicate and normalized to cellular PI levels. Peak ratios were compared using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants of the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF; grant No. P400PM_191032 to D.L. and grant No. P2BSP3_191740 to D.R.), the Theodor Körner Fonds 2020 (to J.M.), a EU Horizon 2020 MSCA grant (No. 860954 to T.S.), and grants by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF; grant No. P 33955-B to G.J.S. and H.H.S., grant No. DOC 33-B27 to H.H.S. and J.M., and grant No. P 34036 to M.S. and R.B.-G.). Support was also provided by the NIDA Intramural Research Program (No. Z1A DA000610 to G.A.C.-H., A.C., and A.H.N.). Graphical illustrations were created with BioRender.com. The authors express their gratitude to Elena Parkinson for assistance in cell culture.
Author contributions
D.L., J.M., A.K.D., M.B., A.H.N., O.K., T.S., G.J.S., and H.H.S. designed research; D.L., J.M., D.R., D.S, T.J.F.A., S.S., K.J., M.H., G.A.C.-H., M.S., I.B., J.-W.Y., and A.C. performed research; D.L., J.M., D.S., M.B., T.S., G.J.S., M.S., I.B., R.B.-G., and H.H.S. analyzed data; D.L., G.J.S., and H.H.S. wrote the paper with significant input from all other authors.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Biology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Marco Fritzsche and Manuel Breuer.
Data availability
Data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and supplementary information and at zenodo.org upon reasonable request (Zenodo record: 7303693).
Code availability
The MATLAB source code for TOCCSL image analysis can be accessed at: https://github.com/schuetzgroup/TOCCSL_analysis.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors jointly supervised this work: Gerhard J. Schütz, Harald H. Sitte.
Contributor Information
Gerhard J. Schütz, Email: schuetz@iap.tuwien.ac.at
Harald H. Sitte, Email: harald.sitte@meduniwien.ac.at
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s42003-022-04210-1.
References
- 1.Pacholczyk T, Blakely RD, Amara SG. Expression cloning of a cocaine- and antidepressant-sensitive human noradrenaline transporter. Nature. 1991;350:350–354. doi: 10.1038/350350a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kristensen AS, et al. SLC6 neurotransmitter transporters: structure, function, and regulation. Pharm. Rev. 2011;63:585–640. doi: 10.1124/pr.108.000869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Amara SG, Kuhar MJ. Neurotransmitter transporters: recent progress. Annu Rev. Neurosci. 1993;16:73–93. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.000445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schroeder C, Jordan J. Norepinephrine transporter function and human cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2012;303:H1273–H1282. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00492.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Luethi D, Liechti ME. Designer drugs: mechanism of action and adverse effects. Arch. Toxicol. 2020;94:1085–1133. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02693-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chiba P, Freissmuth M, Stockner T. Defining the blanks – pharmacochaperoning of SLC6 transporters and ABC transporters. Pharm. Res. 2014;83:63–73. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2013.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Haenisch B, et al. Association of major depression with rare functional variants in norepinephrine transporter and serotonin1A receptor genes. Am. J. Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2009;150b:1013–1016. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shannon JR, et al. Orthostatic intolerance and tachycardia associated with norepinephrine-transporter deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;342:541–549. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200002243420803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Baumeister H, Parker G. Meta-review of depressive subtyping models. J. Affect Disord. 2012;139:126–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Takano H, et al. Norepinephrine transporter occupancy by nortriptyline in patients with depression: a positron emission tomography study with (S,S)-[18F]FMeNER-D2. Int J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;17:553–560. doi: 10.1017/S1461145713001521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Trautmann S, Rehm J, Wittchen HU. The economic costs of mental disorders: do our societies react appropriately to the burden of mental disorders? EMBO Rep. 2016;17:1245–1249. doi: 10.15252/embr.201642951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Al-Harbi KS. Treatment-resistant depression: therapeutic trends, challenges, and future directions. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:369–388. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S29716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Apparsundaram S, Galli A, DeFelice LJ, Hartzell HC, Blakely RD. Acute regulation of norepinephrine transport: I. Protein kinase C-linked muscarinic receptors influence transport capacity and transporter density in SK-N-SH cells. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 1998;287:733–743. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Apparsundaram S, Schroeter S, Giovanetti E, Blakely RD. Acute regulation of norepinephrine transport: II. PKC-modulated surface expression of human norepinephrine transporter proteins. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 1998;287:744–751. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu JJ, et al. Regulation of monoamine transporters and receptors by lipid microdomains: implications for depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;43:2165–2179. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0133-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Buchmayer F, et al. Amphetamine actions at the serotonin transporter rely on the availability of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:11642–11647. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220552110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Anderluh A, et al. Direct PIP2 binding mediates stable oligomer formation of the serotonin transporter. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:14089. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Belovich AN, et al. A network of phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate (PIP2) binding sites on the dopamine transporter regulates amphetamine behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Psychiatry. 2021;26:4417–4430. doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0620-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jayaraman K, et al. SLC6 transporter oligomerization. J. Neurochem. 2021;157:919–929. doi: 10.1111/jnc.15145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hamilton PJ, et al. PIP2 regulates psychostimulant behaviors through its interaction with a membrane protein. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014;10:582–589. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Czech MP. PIP2 and PIP3: complex roles at the cell surface. Cell. 2000;100:603–606. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80696-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hansen SB, Tao X, MacKinnon R. Structural basis of PIP2 activation of the classical inward rectifier K+ channel Kir2.2. Nature. 2011;477:495–498. doi: 10.1038/nature10370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schulze D, Krauter T, Fritzenschaft H, Soom M, Baukrowitz T. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) modulation of ATP and pH sensitivity in Kir channels. A tale of an active and a silent PIP2 site in the N terminus. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:10500–10505. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M208413200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Soom M, et al. Multiple PIP2 binding sites in Kir2.1 inwardly rectifying potassium channels. FEBS Lett. 2001;490:49–53. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02136-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hille B, Dickson EJ, Kruse M, Vivas O, Suh BC. Phosphoinositides regulate ion channels. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 2015;1851:844–856. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McLaughlin S, Murray D. Plasma membrane phosphoinositide organization by protein electrostatics. Nature. 2005;438:605–611. doi: 10.1038/nature04398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Harraz OF, Hill-Eubanks D, Nelson MT. PIP2: a critical regulator of vascular ion channels hiding in plain sight. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:20378–20389. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2006737117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yen HY, et al. PtdIns(4,5)P2 stabilizes active states of GPCRs and enhances selectivity of G-protein coupling. Nature. 2018;559:423–427. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0325-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Soares JC, et al. Concurrent measures of protein kinase C and phosphoinositides in lithium-treated bipolar patients and healthy individuals: a preliminary study. Psychiatry Res. 2000;95:109–118. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(00)00175-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Soares JC, Dippold CS, Mallinger AG. Platelet membrane phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate alterations in bipolar disorder – evidence from a single case study. Psychiatry Res. 1997;69:197–202. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(96)03022-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mandal, K. Review of PIP2 in cellular signaling, functions and diseases. Int J Mol Sci21, 218342 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Arancio O. PIP2: a new key player in Alzheimer’s disease. Cellscience. 2008;5:44–47. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kurita M. Noradrenaline plays a critical role in the switch to a manic episode and treatment of a depressive episode. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2016;12:2373–2380. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S109835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gannon M, et al. Noradrenergic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:220. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Anderluh A, et al. Single molecule analysis reveals coexistence of stable serotonin transporter monomers and oligomers in the live cell plasma membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:4387–4394. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.531632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Das AK, et al. Dopamine transporter forms stable dimers in the live cell plasma membrane in a phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate-independent manner. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294:5632–5642. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sitte HH, Farhan H, Javitch JA. Sodium-dependent neurotransmitter transporters: oligomerization as a determinant of transporter function and trafficking. Mol. Inter. 2004;4:38–47. doi: 10.1124/mi.4.1.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Seidel S, et al. Amphetamines take two to tango: an oligomer-based counter-transport model of neurotransmitter transport explores the amphetamine action. Mol. Pharm. 2005;67:140–151. doi: 10.1124/mol.67.1.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Siciliano CA, et al. Amphetamine reverses escalated cocaine intake via restoration of dopamine transporter conformation. J. Neurosci. 2018;38:484–497. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2604-17.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sorkina, T., Ma, S., Larsen, M. B., Watkins, S. C. & Sorkin, A. Small molecule induced oligomerization, clustering and clathrin-independent endocytosis of the dopamine transporter. Elife7, e32293 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 41.Khelashvili G, et al. Spontaneous inward opening of the dopamine transporter is triggered by PIP2-regulated dynamics of the N-terminus. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2015;6:1825–1837. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Moertelmaier M, Brameshuber M, Linimeier M, Schütz GJ, Stockinger H. Thinning out clusters while conserving stoichiometry of labeling. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005;87:263903. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hahn MK, Robertson D, Blakely RD. A mutation in the human norepinephrine transporter gene (SLC6A2) associated with orthostatic intolerance disrupts surface expression of mutant and wild-type transporters. J. Neurosci. 2003;23:4470–4478. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-11-04470.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kocabas AM, Rudnick G, Kilic F. Functional consequences of homo- but not hetero-oligomerization between transporters for the biogenic amine neurotransmitters. J. Neurochem. 2003;85:1513–1520. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01793.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Torres GE, Gainetdinov RR, Caron MG. Plasma membrane monoamine transporters: structure, regulation and function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2003;4:13–25. doi: 10.1038/nrn1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jayaraman K, et al. Dopamine transporter oligomerization involves the scaffold domain, but spares the bundle domain. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018;14:e1006229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hong WC, Amara SG. Membrane cholesterol modulates the outward facing conformation of the dopamine transporter and alters cocaine binding. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:32616–32626. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.150565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Laursen L, et al. Cholesterol binding to a conserved site modulates the conformation, pharmacology, and transport kinetics of the human serotonin transporter. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:3510–3523. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.809046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yeagle PL. Cholesterol and the cell membrane. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 1985;822:267–287. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(85)90011-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Brown DA, London E. Structure and origin of ordered lipid domains in biological membranes. J. Membr. Biol. 1998;164:103–114. doi: 10.1007/s002329900397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sevcsik E, Schütz GJ. With or without rafts? Alternative views on cell membranes. Bioessays. 2016;38:129–139. doi: 10.1002/bies.201500150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Scanlon SM, Williams DC, Schloss P. Membrane cholesterol modulates serotonin transporter activity. Biochemistry. 2001;40:10507–10513. doi: 10.1021/bi010730z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Waugh MG. PIPs in neurological diseases. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 2015;1851:1066–1082. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2015.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Holland N, Robbins TW, Rowe JB. The role of noradrenaline in cognition and cognitive disorders. Brain. 2021;144:2243–2256. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zacharias DA, Violin JD, Newton AC, Tsien RY. Partitioning of lipid-modified monomeric GFPs into membrane microdomains of live cells. Science. 2002;296:913–916. doi: 10.1126/science.1068539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Camacho-Hernandez GA, et al. Illuminating the norepinephrine transporter: fluorescent probes based on nisoxetine and talopram. RSC Med Chem. 2021;12:1174–1186. doi: 10.1039/d1md00072a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Coleman JA, Green EM, Gouaux E. X-ray structures and mechanism of the human serotonin transporter. Nature. 2016;532:334–339. doi: 10.1038/nature17629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Shen MY, Sali A. Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci. 2006;15:2507–2524. doi: 10.1110/ps.062416606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Webb B, Sali A. Protein structure modeling with MODELLER. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014;1137:1–15. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0366-5_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Dolinsky TJ, Nielsen JE, McCammon JA, Baker NA. PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:W665–W667. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Baker NA, Sept D, Joseph S, Holst MJ, McCammon JA. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:10037–10041. doi: 10.1073/pnas.181342398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Clark J, et al. Quantification of PtdInsP3 molecular species in cells and tissues by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods. 2011;8:267–272. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and supplementary information and at zenodo.org upon reasonable request (Zenodo record: 7303693).
The MATLAB source code for TOCCSL image analysis can be accessed at: https://github.com/schuetzgroup/TOCCSL_analysis.