Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Nov 18;17(11):e0277988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277988

Serial choriocapillaris flow changes in eyes with branched retinal vascular obstruction (BRVO)

Bo-Een Hwang 1,2, Jae-Hyuck Kwak 1,2, Joo-Young Kim 1,2, Rae-Young Kim 1,2, Mirinae Kim 1,2, Young-Geun Park 1,2, Young-Hoon Park 1,2,*
Editor: Alfred S Lewin3
PMCID: PMC9674129  PMID: 36399455

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the choriocapillaris (CC) flow changes in branched retinal vascular obstruction (BRVO) on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 29 patients with unilateral BRVO (58 eyes, including unaffected fellow eyes for controls). 4.5 x 4.5 mm macular scans were divided into 4 quadrants. Serial analyses were conducted on CC flow voids of the opposite quadrant to the active occluded area in BRVO eyes. Each of the quadrants were also compared to the occluded quadrant of resolved eyes and the contralateral quadrant of fellow eyes by matched data analysis. A regression analysis was performed on the several parameters (Choroidal thickness; CT, Choroidal vascularity index; CVI, Central macular thickness; CMT, The number of intravitreal injections) and CC flow voids.

Results

The CC flow void increased sequentially: The uninvolved quadrant of acute BRVO-affected eyes, that of resolved eyes after 3-month/1-year, the contralateral quadrant of fellow eye, the involved (occluded) quadrant of resolved eyes. There were significant correlations between initial CMT, the number of injections and the CC flow void of uninvolved quadrants (P = 0.025, 0.031, respectively), and between the involved (occluded) quadrants and fellow CT (P = 0.029).

Conclusion

CC flow void of uninvolved macular areas decreased significantly in eyes with acute BRVO, suggesting that CC changes were limited to the blocked area and a compensatory mechanism would work in surrounding areas.

Introduction

Branched retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) is a vision-threatening disease depending on ischemic area and recurrence of macular edema (ME) [1, 2]. Although BRVO is a disease of the retina, several studies presented some remarkable results that choroidal characteristics would affect the disease prognosis [3–6]. Prognosis of BRVO is mainly determined by visual acuity, which is also affected by outer retina integrity and choriocapillaris (CC) flow. CC flow was decreased in chronic BRVO in some research [7–9], but it is not clear whether this change is due to the inflow of extracellular fluid or that of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) from retina to choroid [7, 10].

Due to the development of OCTA, recent studies on CC have been vigorously conducted, but limited research has been done on BRVO. Even if there were, the analyses have been done only for the chronic and stable BRVO without ME. The reason was that in the case of acute BRVO, active hemorrhage and severe edema often involved macula, and accurate CC flow analysis was challenging.

However, in most acute BRVOs, the degree of hemorrhage and ME is particularly severe in any quadrant in OCTA macula scan, rather than the entire macula, and in the opposite quadrant, it is often not severe, even close to normal. Therefore, this study identified how CC flow voids in uninvolved quadrants changed from acute affected BRVO eyes to short-term resolved eyes and long-term resolved eyes using Topcon SS-OCTA (DRI Triton) macula scans. It is thought that it would be possible to obtain a lot of information about changes in choroidal flow in BRVO. We also conducted some analyses to ascertain whether there was any association between CC flow voids and optical coherence tomography (OCT) quantitative parameters, such as choroidal thickness (CT) and choroidal vascularity index (CVI), and the central macular thickness (CMT), to better understand the pathophysiology of BRVO.

Methods

Study population

The observational retrospective study was performed in the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science at Seoul St Mary’s Hospital and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. All protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea Catholic Medical Center. (KC22RISI0102) Due to the retrospective nature and anonymized data, the written consent procedure was exempted in accordance with the Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital IRB regulations.

Twenty-nine patients who were diagnosed with monocular BRVO were selected in this study; their corresponding healthy fellow eyes were also analyzed. All participants were chosen between January 2019 and August 2020 at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital in Korea. We performed a retrospective review of their medical records. The exclusion criteria were: (1) refractive errors (spherical equivalent, ± six diopters); (2) history of ocular trauma or treatment (laser treatment, intraocular surgery, intravitreal injections); (3) systemic diseases that could make a retinal change except hypertension; (4) other retinal illness, including age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, uveitis, glaucoma, or other neurodegenerative disease; (5) media opacities that could alter image quality.

Study protocol

Demographic data, medical history, and ophthalmologic history were recorded at the initial visit. All subjects underwent an ocular examination, including slit-lamp microscopy, dilated fundus examination, OCT, and OCTA. OCT/OCTA imaging was performed using the Topcon DRI Triton SS-OCT device using a 1050-nm wavelength light source, and a scanning speed of 100,000 A-scans/s. BRVO was diagnosed when its typical characteristics (regional flame shift hemorrhage along with vessels, macula edema) were present on fundus exam and OCT images. The BRVO eyes accompanying vitreous hemorrhage or multiple vascular obstruction (ex. hemi-CRVO) were excluded. 4.5 x 4.5 mm OCTA CC macular scans were divided into 4 quadrants. Serial analyses were conducted on CC flow voids of the opposite (uninvolved) quadrant to the active vessel-occluded area in BRVO eyes. OCT/OCTA images showing retinal hemorrhage with ME, involving macula no more than half, were selected and designated as “Acute BRVO-affected eye”. Resolutions of ME and macular hemorrhage were defined to reduced central retinal thickness by more than a half or decreased retinal hemorrhage with intraretinal fluid by more than two-thirds within 3 months after any intravitreal injections. The resolved states were confirmed in all subjects and OCT/OCTA images at that time were used for the analysis of “Short-term BRVO-resolved eyes”. “Long-term BRVO-resolved eyes” pertained to the images of stable BRVO without ME and hemorrhage after 1-year disease onset. “Fellow eyes” pertained to the contralateral quadrant CC images from the other unaffected fellow eyes of BRVO patients. “Long-term occluded (involved) BRVO-resolved eyes” pertained to the images of the vessel-occluded (involved) quadrants of resolved stable BRVO after 1-year disease onset. All OCTA images were evaluated by two experienced independent retinal specialists (Y-H.P. and B-E.H.) who were blinded to the other imaging findings and the clinical histories.

Choriocapillaris flow void measurement

All OCTA images in this study met an image quality of 65 or higher with no line artifacts or noise. Fig 1A–1C shows the process of calculation of a CC void image in OCTA. The 4.5 × 4.5 mm (320 × 320 pixels) CC images were obtained using a slab from the boundary of the basement membrane (BM) to 20.8 μm, which was calculated from the OCTARA segmentation algorithm built in the Topcon imageNET software.

Fig 1. A representative case of affected eyes to demonstrate the process to calculate choriocapillaris (CC) flow voids (%) of the opposite uninvolved quadrant in the OCTA image.

Fig 1

(A) The 4.5 × 4.5 mm (320 × 320 pixels) CC images were obtained using a slab from the boundary of the basement membrane (BM) to 20.8 μm. (B) A quadrant square area of 2.25 × 2.25 mm (160 × 160 pixels) was selected as the opposite uninvolved lesion (yellow), which is located on the opposite side of the area that showed black pixels due to bleeding from vessel obstructions (involved). Then, we applied the phansalkar threshold method (15 window radius) to the uninvolved quadrant. (C) Calculated flow voids using Image J tool “Analyze particle” (>1 pixel) were presented as white only within the boundary of the quadrant.

We selected a quadrant square area of 2.25 × 2.25 mm (160 × 160 pixels) as the opposite (uninvolved) lesion, which is located on the opposite side of the area that showed black pixels due to bleeding from vessel obstructions (involved). In long-term (1-year disease onset) BRVO-resolved eyes, the same-sized occluded quadrants were also selected. Then, we applied the phansalkar threshold method (15 window radius) to the uninvolved and involved quadrants, respectively [11, 12]. Using the “Analyze particle” command in Image J software (version 1.53a; https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) that calculated all threshold areas bigger than or equal to 1 pixel of flow void, the percentage (%), count (n), average size (pixel^2) of CC flow void area were measured.

Choroidal thickness measurement

CT was calculated using the automatic built-in software within the SS-OCT device. Subfoveal CT was determined by calculating the distance from the outer border of the RPE to the inner edge of the suprachoroidal space [13]. We measured CT manually at the foveal center using digital calipers provided by the SS-OCT software. Two experienced independent observers measured the SFCT, and the average value was used in the analysis to avoid inter-observer variation.

Choroidal vascularity index assessment

A 12 mm raster scan passing through the fovea was chosen for image binarization to obtain the CVI. It was segmented using the protocol described by Agrawal et al. [14], and image binarization was performed using Image J software. The ratio of luminal area (LA) to total choroidal area (TCA) was defined as the CVI. Two experienced independent observers measured the CVI, and the average value was used in the analysis to avoid inter-observer variation.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows (version 24.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis was conducted to evaluate intergrader reliability. The mean differences between uninvolved quadrants of the acute BRVO-affected eye, short-term BRVO-resolved eyes, long-term BRVO-resolved eyes, occluded (involved) quadrants of long-term BRVO-resolved eyes, and the fellow eyes were assessed using the paired t-test. Modulated p-value was calculated by multiplying the number of comparisons (x10) to the original p-value from the paired t-test. A linear regression analysis was conducted between the OCT parameters (CVI, CT, CMT), the number of intravitreal injections and the quadrant CC flow voids (%). Two-sided P-values of <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Demographics and characteristics, including OCT and OCTA measurements (CMT, CVI, CT and CC) are in Table 1. ICC was 0.972 for single measures and 0.986 for average measurements (p < 0.001), which were assessed as an excellent agreement between two graders [15]. The mean quadrant CC flow void increased significantly, with the following sequence: the uninvolved quadrant of acute BRVO-affected eyes, that of resolved eyes after 3-months, 1-year disease onset, the contralateral quadrant of fellow eye, the involved quadrant of resolved eyes after 1-year disease onset. Comparisons between each quadrant were statistically significant (P<0.01), with the exception of some resolved eyes’ comparisons (P>0.05). (Table 2, Fig 2).

Table 1. Demographics and characteristics of the study subjects.

Demographics and characteristics BRVO patients (n = 29)
Age, years 61.34 (±12.79)
Sex, male:female 12:17
Disease eye, OD:OS 16:13
Hypertension (%) 34
Intravitreal injections (n) 2.76 (±1.84)
Choriocapillaris void in OCTA
Affected uninvolved quadrant CC void (%) 27.03 (±6.46)
Resolved uninvolved quadrant CC void (%) (3-months) 35.85 (±4.09)
Resolved uninvolved quadrant CC void (%) (1-year) 35.84 (±5.85)
Resolved occluded quadrant CC void (%) (1-year) 43.10(±4.54)
Fellow control quadrant CC void (%) 38.99 (±1.80)
OCT parameter
Affected eye initial CMT (μm) 554.76 (±208.29)
Affected eye initial CT (μm) 314.07 (±78.34)
Fellow eye CT (μm) 308.34 (±73.96)
Fellow eye CVI (%) 64.63 (±2.10)

CC: choriocapillaris; CMT: central macular thickness; CVI: choroidal vascularity index; CT: subfoveal choroidal thickness. Data are presented as the mean (± SD) or a number, as appropriate.

Table 2. Choriocapillaris flow void correlation results.

Affected eye Resolved eye Resolved eye Resolved eye Fellow eye
(U/Q) (U/Q) (U/Q) (O/Q) (C/Q)
(baseline) (3 months) (1 year) (1 year) (baseline)
1 2 3 4 5
CC void (%) 27.03 (±6.46) 35.85 (±4.09) 35.84 (±5.85) 43.10(±4.54) 38.99 (±1.80)
Mean difference 1 vs 2 1 vs 3 1 vs 4 1 vs 5 2 vs 3
(Corrected P-value)
P<0.01 P<0.01 P<0.01 P<0.01 P = 1.00
2 vs 4 2 vs 5 3 vs 4 3 vs 5 4 vs 5
P<0.01 P = 0.07 P<0.01 P = 0.06 P<0.01

Paired t-test for choriocapillaris flow void (%) between the opposite quadrant of BRVO affected eyes, resolved eyes (3 months), long-term resolved eyes (1-year), the occluded quadrant of long-term resolved eyes (1-year) and contralateral quadrant of unaffected fellow eyes.

Bonferonni Correction for multiple comparison testing. Corrected P-value was presented by multiplying the number of comparisons (x10) to the original P-value.

p-values that are statistically significant are highlighted in bold. (p<0.05)

U/Q; uninvolved quadrant, O/Q; occluded quadrant, C/Q; contralateral eye corresponding quadrant.

Fig 2. Quadrant choriocapillaris (CC) flow voids (%) in the OCTA images as box-plots.

Fig 2

The values of each quadrant CC flow were presented with the following sequence: The uninvolved quadrant of acute BRVO-affected eyes, that of resolved eyes after 3-months, 1-year disease onset, the involved (occluded) quadrant of resolved eyes after 1-year disease onset, and the contralateral quadrant of fellow eye. The asterisk indicates significant P-value (<0.05). Paired t-test was used.

The results of the linear regression analysis between the OCT choroidal parameters (CMT, CT, fellow CVI), total intravitreal injections (anti-VEGFs and steroids) and the OCTA CC flow void are shown in Table 3. There were significant correlations between initial CMT, the number of intravitreal injections and CC flow void of acute BRVO uninvolved quadrants (P = 0.025, 0.031, respectively), and between the involved (occluded) quadrants of resolved eyes after 1-year disease onset and fellow CT (P = 0.029). Otherwise, no statistically significant relationship was found.

Table 3. Univariate regression analysis results between choriocapillaris (CC) flow voids and several OCT parameters & the number of injections.

CC Flow voids Opposite quadrants CC flow void Occluded quadrants CC flow void
(Acute affected) (long-term resolved after 1 year)
P value R2 Standardized ß P value R2 Standardized ß
Initial CMT 0.025 0.172 -0.415 0.617 0.009 0.097
Initial CT 0.998 0.000 -0.001 0.274 0.044 -0.210
Fellow CT 0.783 0.003 -0.053 0.029 0.164 -0.405
Fellow CVI 0.355 0.032 -0.178 0.194 0.062 -0.248
Total intravitreal injection 0.031 0.160 0.400 0.961 0.000 -0.010

ß, regression coefficient. p-values that were statistically significant are highlighted in bold. (p<0.05). CT: choroidal thickness; CVI: choroidal vascularity index.

Discussion

The significant decrease in CC flow void in the uninvolved quadrant of acute BRVO affected eyes indicates that there might be a compensation of surrounding areas for the CC flow reduction in the obstructed region by using VEGF effects or autonomic nerve systems [16, 17]. Although the extracellular fluid inflow from retina to choroid, previously suggested by Aribas et al. [7], could generally aggravated the choroidal blood flow, it could also be speculated that our homeostatic system works to preserve the function of the outer retina by increasing the CC flow to a greater extent within the relatively intact neighboring area. Furthermore, the result that the CC flow void of the occluded quadrant after 1-year disease onset is higher than that of the fellow or any other acute, resolved uninvolved quadrant confirmed that the CC flow reduction was limited to the area where the actual vascular obstruction occurred. Borrelli et al. [18] hypothesized that if choroidal volume exceeded the specific threshold levels, fenestrated intravascular hydrostatic pressure would be increased in the CC, leading to CC hypoperfusion. The fact that CC hypoperfusion occurred only in a localized area is consistent with the results of Kim et al.’s report that CT significantly increased especially more in occlusive lesions of BRVO [5].

The regression analyses between several parameters and CC flow voids of acute uninvolved/long-term-resolved involved (occluded) quadrants showed some remarkable results. The p-value of acute uninvolved quadrant CC flow void with initial CMT was statistically significant (P = 0.025), suggesting that the more severe the ischemia or ME, the more active the compensation was in the surrounding area. More elaborate research should be done to elucidate whether the compensation was due to the highly concentrated VEGF from retina or the diminished sympathetic activity from the choroidal congestion, possibly caused by a rush of extracellular fluid. Second, the result that the long-term resolved BRVO involved (occluded) quadrant CC flow void decreased as the fellow eyes’ CT increased could be demonstrated that the BRVO CC damage could be alleviated when an individual had a larger inherent choroidal volume capacity. An et al. [4] reported that BRVO affected/fellow eye CT ratio was associated with VEGF concentration and thicker CT might contribute the visual gain with the decrease in CMT after anti-VEGF injection. As for the mechanism suggested by Aribas et al. [7], when there is a fluid inflow from the retina due to retinal vascular obstruction, the choroidal flow congestion with delayed CC flow would occur, the degree of which would be determined according to the choroidal volume capacity [19]. Based on our previous report [6], we expected that fellow eye CVI would do a role for CC flow changes in the occluded areas, however, there was no significant p-value between CVI and any CC flow voids. The difference would come from the fact that the previous study selected the patient who did not show macula-involving hemorrhage in BRVO, and analyzed visual acuities of longer duration of illness. As we analyzed the only quadrant CC of 4.5 x 4.5 mm macula scan, subfoveal CT would better reflect the CC changes in the obstructed area than the CVI, which was calculated from total choroid of 12 x 9 mm scan. The effect of choroidal large veins dilatation, well representing as CVI, on CC flow change in BRVO might be clearly understood when backed up with a large and well-designed study. The correlation between the number of injections and the CC flow void in occluded quadrant also did not show a statistically significant p-value, suggesting that the additional decrease in CC flow due to repeated injections, which can be inferred from the study of Julien et al. [20], was not confirmed in this study. However, the meaningful p-value of comparison between the number of injections and the void in uninvolved quadrant at the acute phase could be interpreted that proper compensations of surrounding area could affect BRVO prognosis, or recurrence rates, especially in terms of treatment intensities.

There were some limitations to this study. CC flow voids of obstructed quadrant could not be continuously measured due to hemorrhage masking effect at the acute phase. CC flow changes from the longer term perspective could not be confirmed with only 1-year of observation. The eyes of BRVO that occurred at the peripheral side, not accompanying macular hemorrhage or edema, which accounts for a significant portion in the real world, were excluded from the study. The lower lateral resolution of Topcon SS-OCTA than PLEX Elite 9000, and a small number of subjects were other possible shortcomings in the current study.

In conclusion, we identified the pattern of CC flow changes in the surrounding macular area of BRVO by analyzing serial quadrant OCTA macula scans in this study. We believe that we were able to get closer to the changes of choroidal flow in eyes with BRVO with our novel results.

Supporting information

S1 File. Dataset.

(XLSX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020R1F1A1074898). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Hayreh SS. Ocular vascular occlusive disorders: natural history of visual outcome. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2014;41:1–25. Epub 2014/04/29. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ip M, Hendrick A. Retinal Vein Occlusion Review. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2018;7(1):40–5. Epub 2017/12/28. doi: 10.22608/APO.2017442 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rayess N, Rahimy E, Ying GS, Pefkianaki M, Franklin J, Regillo CD, et al. Baseline choroidal thickness as a short-term predictor of visual acuity improvement following antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy in branch retinal vein occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(1):55–9. Epub 2018/03/24. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-311898 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.An Y, Park SP, Kim YK. Aqueous humor inflammatory cytokine levels and choroidal thickness in patients with macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion. Int Ophthalmol. 2021;41(7):2433–44. Epub 2021/03/20. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01798-x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim KH, Lee DH, Lee JJ, Park SW, Byon IS, Lee JE. Regional Choroidal Thickness Changes in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema. Ophthalmologica. 2015;234(2):109–18. Epub 2015/08/26. doi: 10.1159/000437276 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hwang BE, Kim M, Park YH. Role of the choroidal vascularity index in branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) with macular edema. PLoS One. 2021;16(10):e0258728. Epub 2021/10/22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aribas YK, Hondur AM, Tezel TH. Choroidal vascularity index and choriocapillary changes in retinal vein occlusions. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020;258(11):2389–97. Epub 20200829. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04886-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mastropasqua R, Toto L, Di Antonio L, Borrelli E, Senatore A, Di Nicola M, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography microvascular findings in macular edema due to central and branch retinal vein occlusions. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40763. Epub 2017/01/18. doi: 10.1038/srep40763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Deng Y, Cai X, Zhang S, Su L, Chen H, Lin Y, et al. Quantitative Analysis of Retinal Microvascular Changes after Conbercept Therapy in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Ophthalmologica. 2019;242(2):69–80. Epub 2019/05/22. doi: 10.1159/000499608 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Alis A, Guler Alis M. The effect of branch retinal vein occlusion on the vascular structure of the choroid. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2022;37:102687. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Spaide RF. Choriocapillaris Flow Features Follow a Power Law Distribution: Implications for Characterization and Mechanisms of Disease Progression. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;170:58–67. Epub 2016/08/09. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.07.023 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chu Z, Cheng Y, Zhang Q, Zhou H, Dai Y, Shi Y, et al. Quantification of Choriocapillaris with Phansalkar Local Thresholding: Pitfalls to Avoid. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;213:161–76. Epub 2020/02/16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.02.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Baltmr A, Lightman S, Tomkins-Netzer O. Examining the choroid in ocular inflammation: a focus on enhanced depth imaging. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:459136. Epub 2014/07/16. doi: 10.1155/2014/459136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Agrawal R, Gupta P, Tan KA, Cheung CM, Wong TY, Cheng CY. Choroidal vascularity index as a measure of vascular status of the choroid: Measurements in healthy eyes from a population-based study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21090. Epub 2016/02/13. doi: 10.1038/srep21090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2016;15(2):155–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lee B, Yoo G, Yun C, Oh J. Short-term effects of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor on peripapillary choroid and choriocapillaris in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(10):2163–72. Epub 2019/08/02. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04432-w . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Steinle JJ, Pierce JD, Clancy RL, P GS. Increased ocular blood vessel numbers and sizes following chronic sympathectomy in rat. Exp Eye Res. 2002;74(6):761–8. Epub 2002/07/20. doi: 10.1006/exer.2002.1182 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Borrelli E, Gabela MC, Sacconi R, Querques L, Vella G, Zuccaro B, et al. Choroidal luminal and stromal areas and choriocapillaris perfusion are characterised by a non-linear quadratic relation in healthy eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105(4):567–72. Epub 20200603. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316479 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kishi S, Matsumoto H, Sonoda S, Hiroe T, Sakamoto T, Akiyama H. Geographic filling delay of the choriocapillaris in the region of dilated asymmetric vortex veins in central serous chorioretinopathy. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0206646. Epub 2018/11/10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Julien S, Biesemeier A, Taubitz T, Schraermeyer U. Different effects of intravitreally injected ranibizumab and aflibercept on retinal and choroidal tissues of monkey eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(6):813–25. Epub 2014/01/25. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304019 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Alfred S Lewin

26 Oct 2022

PONE-D-22-16909Serial choriocapillaris flow changes in eyes with branched retinal vascular obstruction (BRVO).PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Park,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please assess the variability between observers. Please reformat Tables 1 and 2. Pleasentighten up your Discussion so that its logic is clear.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 10 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Alfred S Lewin, Ph.D.

Section Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf  and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“Funding resource: This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020R1F1A1074898).”

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Thank you for stating the following in your Competing Interests section: 

“Competing interests: None of the authors have any conflicting interests to disclose.”

Please complete your Competing Interests on the online submission form to state any Competing Interests. If you have no competing interests, please state "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.", as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now

 This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Please include a copy of Table 3 which you refer to in your text on page 10.

5. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

********** 

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

********** 

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

********** 

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

********** 

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dr. Young-Hoon Park and his colleagues evaluated the CC flow changes in branched retinal vascular obstruction (BRVO) on OCTA. I think the study provided meaningful guidance for the changes of choroidal flow in eyes with BRVO. However, this paper has some minor mistakes which need to be modified.

1. In Methods about the statistical analysis, I think there should be the assessment of inter-oberserver reliability.

2. The structure of Table 1 and Table 2 should be modified according to the standards.

3. In Discussion, the structure needs some adjustments, for the logic is confusing to some extent.

********** 

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Nov 18;17(11):e0277988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277988.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


5 Nov 2022

Dear Editors,

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to submit a revised draft of our manuscript titled “Serial choriocapillaris flow changes in eyes with branched retinal vascular obstruction (BRVO)” to PLOS ONE. We appreciate the time and effort that you and the reviewers have dedicated to providing your valuable feedback on the manuscript. We are grateful to the reviewers for their insightful comments on the paper. We have been able to incorporate changes to reflect most of the suggestions provided by the reviewers. We have highlighted those changes within the manuscript with red color.

Here below are point-by-point responses to the reviewers’ comments and concerns.

Comments from Reviewer #1

The authors would like to thank the reviewer for taking the time to review our paper. We have made corrections and clarifications in the manuscript after going over the comments about limitations.

� Comment 1: In Methods about the statistical analysis, I think there should be the assessment of inter-oberserver reliability.

Response: Thank you for your thoughtful comment. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis was performed to calculate intergrader reliability. ICC was 0.972 for single measures and 0.986 for average measurements (p < 0.001). We clarified these contents in the revised manuscript.

� Comment 2: The structure of Table 1 and Table 2 should be modified according to the standards.

Response: Thank you for your thoughtful comments. We respected your opinion, and we made a modification of the table contents to better fit the standards.

� Comment 3: In Discussion, the structure needs some adjustments, for the logic is confusing to some extent.

Response: We acknowledge that the explanation and logics we made seemed to cause confusion. We corrected the discussion contents to be more understandable. Thank you.

We look forward to hearing from you in due time regarding our submission and to responding to any further questions and comments you may have.

Sincerely,

Young-Hoon Park, MD, PhD

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea

E-mail: parkyh@catholic.ac.kr

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Alfred S Lewin

8 Nov 2022

Serial choriocapillaris flow changes in eyes with branched retinal vascular obstruction (BRVO).

PONE-D-22-16909R1

Dear Dr. Park,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Alfred S Lewin, Ph.D.

Section Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Alfred S Lewin

10 Nov 2022

PONE-D-22-16909R1

Serial choriocapillaris flow changes in eyes with branched retinal vascular obstruction (BRVO).

Dear Dr. Park:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Alfred S Lewin

Section Editor

PLOS ONE


Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES