Skip to main content
Access Microbiology logoLink to Access Microbiology
. 2022 Oct 27;4(10):acmi000446. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000446

Escherichia coli harbouring strAB with reduced susceptibility towards gentamicin and amikacin: a single centre study from India

Jayalaxmi Wangkheimayum 1, Prynali Phonglo 1, K Melson Singha 2, Debadatta Dhar Chanda 2, Amitabha Bhattacharjee 1,*
PMCID: PMC9675172  PMID: 36415738

Abstract

In this study we report the presence of streptomycin resistance gene strAB within clinical isolates of Escherichia coli where streptomycin is not used to treat Gram-negative infections. In total, 135 E. coli isolates were obtained for the study. PCR based detection of strAB was performed in the study isolates followed by assessment of horizontal transferability. Cloning of strAB was done in laboratory strain E. coli DH5α. Pre-cloning and post-cloning susceptibility of the strain was done for assessment of acquired resistance. Among tested isolates, 89 were found to harbour strAB and it was encoded within a IncI1 type plasmid. Cloning experiments revealed the strAB gene showed unusual non-susceptibility towards amikacin and gentamicin. The study highlighted that strAB, which has a role in streptomycin resistance, may also have a role in reduced susceptibility towards gentamicin and amikacin within a clinical setting.

Keywords: aminoglycoside, Escherichia coli, ESBL, StrAB

Introduction

Resistance to streptomycin was identified in 1945 by Waksman et al. and can be conferred through chromosomal mutations, thereby altering the ribosomal binding site of streptomycin [1]. It can also be conferred by enzymes which inactivate the molecule at one of the two sites through phosphorylation or adenylation [2]. StrAB encodes streptomycin-inactivating enzymes which are extensively distributed in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. They are often located on broad-host-range plasmids in clinical bacterial isolates, and are frequently associated with the sulII gene that encodes a sulphonamide-resistant alternative dihydropteroate synthase [3, 4]. These genes are reported to be associated with transposons Tn5393 [5]. They are part of the aadA gene cassette which is responsible for aminoglycoside resistance, especially streptomycin and spectinomycin [6]. Over the last 30 years, strAB genes have been reported worldwide in pathogens of plants, humans and animals [4]. However, clinical use of streptomycin is no longer practiced in hospitals for treating Gram-positive and Gram-negative infections where amikacin and gentamicin are predominantly being prescribed. Propagation and maintenance of strAB is reported to be in clinical settings and therefore it is of interest to understand if this resistance determinant has any role towards other aminoglycoside antibiotics.

Thus, the present study investigates the presence of strAB among clinical isolates, and its transmission dynamics, along with its spectrum of resistance towards other aminoglycoside antibiotics.

Methods

Bacterial isolates

A total of 135 non-duplicate isolates of Escherichia coli were obtained spanning 12 months (March 2019 to February 2020) from patients who were admitted to different wards or attended outpatient departments of Silchar Medical College and Hospital, Silchar, India. Samples were taken as a part of standard care and day-to-day routine sampling. The samples were urine (n=87), pus (n=24), wound swab (n=19) and aspirate (n=5). Cysteine-lactose-electrolyte-deficient agar (CLED) and blood agar was used for isolation. The isolates were identified by the VITEK two compact sub-system (BioMérieux, France).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs) of the study isolates against gentamicin, kanamycin, amikacin, streptomycin, tobramycin, and netilmicin (Hi-Media, India) were determined by agar dilution method. For determination of susceptibility against other groups of antimicrobials, Kirby Baur disc diffusion method was used. Antibiotics tested were imipenem (10 µg), cefepime (30 µg), aztreonam (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), cotrimoxazole (25 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), and streptomycin (10 µg) (Hi-Media, India). Results were interpreted as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines 2017 [5]. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as a negative control.

PCR based detection

Amplification of strAB was done using primer pairs strAB-forward 5′TATCTGCGATTGGACCCTCTG3′ and strAB- reverse 5′CATTGCTCATCATTTGATCGGCT3′ [6] for all the study isolates. The reaction was performed under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 mins, denaturation at 95 °C for 30 secs, annealing at 54 °C for 40 secs, extension at 72 °C for 1 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 mins. A previously confirmed laboratory isolate was used as a positive control. PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis on 1 % agarose gel. Amplified products were sequenced by Sanger’s method.

Pre-cloning susceptibility of E. coli DH5α

The pre-cloning antibiotic susceptibility testing of E. coli DH5α was performed to assess susceptibility towards different antibiotics. The antibiotics included were all those mentioned above in the susceptibility testing section. Results were interpreted as per CLSI guidelines 2017 [7].

Cloning of strAB

To understand role of strAB towards other aminoglycoside antibiotics, cloning was done in E. coli DH5α, which is devoid of any aminoglycoside resistance genes. For the cloning of strAB, primers were designed (forward 5′GCTTGGTGATAACGGCAATTCC3′) and reverse-5′ATGTAAGGCCTTTGAATAAGAC3′) from the flanking region of strAB to amplify the whole gene including the promoter region. Ten isolates were selected randomly for amplification of the whole strAB gene. The amplified product was purified using MinElute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and was ligated into pGEM-T Vector (Promega, Madison, USA). Transformation was done using the laboratory strain E. coli DH5α by the heat-shock method. The recipient cell i.e., E. coli DH5α (in 0.1 M CaCl2, 10 % glycerol) and 10 µl of extracted plasmid (HiPurA Plasmid DNA Miniprep Purification kit, Hi-Media, India) from strAB harbouring isolates were mixed and incubated in ice for 30 min. The mixture was subjected to heat-shock at 42 °C for 40 s and it was immediately placed in ice for 10 min. Further, 500 µl of SOC solution was added and incubated for 2 h. The mixture was pelleted and spread over Luria Bertani agar containing 100 µg ml−1 of ampicillin. E. coli DH5α, without performing transformation, was also spread over a screened agar plate which acted as a control. Transformants were selected by blue-white screening in the presence of X-gal, IPTG, and 100 µg ml−1 of ampicillin in the screening LB agar. A PCR assay targeting strAB was performed to confirm the successful cloning of strAB within the host. The clones were further subjected to susceptibility testing against the previously mentioned aminoglycoside group of antibiotics by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method. The overnight culture was diluted with normal saline and the turbidity was adjusted to MacFarland standard 0.5. A Meuller Hinton agar plate was used and the plates were incubated for 16 h. Three replicates of the clone were tested. The results were interpreted as per CLSI guidelines 2017.

Transferability assay

Plasmids encoding strAB gene were extracted by QIAprep Spin Miniprep kit (Qiagen, Germany) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Isolated plasmids were further subjected to transformation assay by the heat-shock method using Escherichia coli DH5α as the recipient. Transformants were selected on the Luria Bertani agar (Hi-Media, Mumbai, India) containing 4 µg ml−1 of streptomycin. Conjugation assay was performed using Escherichia coli harbouring strAB as a donor and azide resistant Escherichia coli J53 as a recipient. Mating was performed where both the donor and recipient cells were cultured in LB broth (Hi-Media) by agitation until it attained optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.8–0.9. Cells were mixed at a ratio of 1 : 5 donor-to-recipient, incubated for 2 h and the transconjugant was selected on LB agar (Hi-Media, Mumbai, India) containing 4 µg ml−1 of streptomycin and 100 µg ml−1 of sodium azide.

PCR based replicon typing

Plasmids encoding the resistance determinant were characterized by PCR based replicon typing to identify the different incompatibility (Inc) groups viz. FIA, FIB, FIC, HI1, HI2, I1/IY, L/M, N, P, W, T, A/C, K, B/O, X, Y, F, and FIIA by performing five multiplex PCR and three simplex PCR [8].

Detection of other co-existing aminoglycoside modifying enzymes (aminoglycoside acetyltransferase, amninoglycoside adenyltransferase and aminoglycoside phosphotransferase)

For amplification and characterization of all the co-existing aminoglycoside modifying enzyme genes (AMEs) two multiplex PCR assays were performed targeting various AME genes viz.; ant(2″)-Ia, ant(3″)-I, ant(4′)-Ia, aac(3)-I, aac(3)-IIc, aac(6′)-Ib, aac(6′)-II, genes viz.; aph (2′)-Ib, aph (2′)-Ic, aph (2')-Id, aph (3')- IIb, aph (3')-I, aph (3′)-IIIa, aph (3')-Via, and aph (4)-Ia (Table S1, available in the online version of this article). The PCR mixture was composed of 12.5 µl Go Taq Green Master mix (Promega, Madison, USA) with 10 pmol of each primer and ~100 ng DNA template. The reaction condition was described previously [9].

Detection of extended spectrum beta-lactamases and carbapenemases

For amplification and characterization of bla ESBL, bla TEM, bla CTX-M, bla SHV, bla PER, bla GES, and bla VEB (Table S2) were targeted. Reactions were run under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 mins, 33 cycles of 94 °C for 35 s, 51 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min and the final extension at 72 °C for 7 mins. For amplification and characterization of the carbapenem-resistance gene; bla KPC, bla NDM, bla VIM, bla IMP, bla OXA-23, bla OXA-48, and bla OXA-58 (Table S2) were targeted. Reactions were performed under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 10 min; 30 cycles of 94 °C for 40 s, 55 °C for 40 s and 72 °C for 1 min, and a final elongation step at 72 °C for 7 mins.

Typing of the isolates by ERIC-PCR

The heterogeneity of the streptomycin-resistant isolates was determined by enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) PCR using primers ERIC-F (5′ATGTAAGCTCCTGGGGATTCAC-3′) and ERIC-R (5′AAGTAAGTGACTGGGGTGAGCG-3′) [9], and the banding patterns were analysed by agarose gel electrophoresis.

Results

Susceptibility testing

Antibiotic susceptibility testing showed imipenem was the most active (85 %; n=76) followed by cefepime (81 %; n=72), aztreonam (81 %; n=72), ceftazidime (79 %; n=71), cefotaxime (78 %; n=70), ceftriaxone (78 %; n=70), ciprofloxacin (55 %; n=49), and cotrimoxazole (41 %; n=37). MIC results showed that 50 % of the isolates showed an inhibition value in the range of intermediate (amikacin, netilmicin and kanamycin) to resistant (gentamicin and tobramycin) towards aminoglycoside antibiotics (Table 1). Isolates devoid of carbapenemases (n=76) and extended spectrum beta-lactamases (n=72) were sensitive to third generation cephalosporins and carbapenems. Among 135 isolates 121 (89.6 %) of them were resistant to at least one of the aminoglycosides tested; however, streptomycin resistance was found in all of them (n=121).

Table 1.

MIC50 and MIC90 value of 89 isolates of E. coli that were harbouring strAB against different aminoglycoside antibiotics

Antimicrobial agents

MIC50 (µg ml−1)

MIC90 (µg ml−1)

Gentamicin

16

512

Tobramycin

32

512

Amikacin

32

512

Netilmicin

16

128

Kanamycin

32

512

PCR detection of strAB and co-carriage of other resistance genes

Eighty-nine isolates harboured the strAB gene. Isolates carrying strAB were found co-harbouring aminoglycoside modifying enzyme genes in 58 isolates. Aminoglycoside phospho transferase types were common i.e. aph (2')-Ib (n=18), aph (4)-Ia (n=8), aph (3')-IIb (n=7), aph (3')-I (n=6), and aph (3')-IIIa (n=3) followed by aminoglycoside adenyl transferase types i.e. ant(3″)-I (n=6), ant (4′)-Ia (n=5) and ant (2″)-Ia (n=2) and variants of aminoglycoside acetyl transferase viz., aac (3)-IIc (n=2) and aac (6′)-Ib (n=1) (Fig. S1). Co-existing extended spectrum beta-lactamase was observed among 17 isolates, of which bla CTX-M was common (n=11), followed by bla TEM (n=3), bla GES (n=1), bla PER (n=1), and bla SHV(n=1). A total of 13 isolates were co-harbouring carbapenemases, of which 10 were carrying bla NDM-1, and four had bla VIM (Table S3).

Cloning of strAB

Cloning was performed to assess the role of strAB towards other aminoglyside antibiotics as the resistance determinant is only known for streptomycin resistance. Pre-cloning susceptibility testing showed that E. coli DH5α was susceptible to all of the aminoglycoside group of antibiotics tested. StrAB clones were selected by blue-white screening and PCR confirmed the presence of strAB within the host. All the clones were found to be streptomycin resistant. Additionally, all ten clones showed an intermediate-range, i.e., non-susceptible towards gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin (Table S5).

Transferability of strAB and ERIC typing

Plasmids isolated from all the strAB-bearing isolates could be selected in the transformants when grown in media containing 4 µg ml−1 streptomycin, and the presence of a resistance gene within the plasmid was confirmed by PCR. Plasmids encoding strAB were also found to be conjugatively transferable for all the cases. Further, PCR based replicon typing confirmed that plasmids harbouring strAB were of the Inc I1 type. Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) PCR showed 49 different haplotypes of E. coli that were harbouring the strAB gene.

Discussion

Streptomycin has limited clinical usage due to hypersensitive reactions and currently being prescribed to treat multidrug resistant tuberculosis [10]. It is at the forefront for therapeutic use in animals and plants, and in additional growth promotion activity, making it very important for use in veterinary medicine [5]. Few studies have reported the presence of strAB within isolates that are obtained from animal and environmental sources, and a previous study reported the linkage of the strA-strB streptomycin-resistance genes with Class one integron sequences on pSTR1, which is isolated from multiple antibiotic-resistance plasmids from Shigella flexneri [11, 12]. StrAB and aadA antibiotic resistance cassette structures (ARCs) were identified and significantly associated with cattle isolates [13]. In an earlier study, 84 % of streptomycin resistant Salmonella enterica isolates from an animal origin were carrying strAB [5]. In another study, 66 % of streptomycin resistant E. coli were found to harbour strAB, which were isolated from meat samples [6]. Similarly, in the present study we have observed a 66 % occurrence of strAB in clinical isolates. The present study underscores the presence of a single Inc-type plasmid responsible for expression of the strAB gene through lateral gene transfer. Considering the scenario of an expansion of strAB from agriculture, animals to humans and vice versa, a holistic approach is needed to detect the resistance determinant and protect against further dissemination. However, the major limitation of this study is the lack of sequence data and genomic context which could support phenotypic observations. ERIC typing showed the presence of 49 haplotypes carrying strAB. This indicates that this resistance determinant has expanded into diverse haplotypes through lateral transfer in the study setting.

For the first time, this study observed that strAB has a role in reduced susceptibility towards clinically relevant aminoglycosides, i.e., gentamicin, amikacin, and tobramycin, which poses a potential threat in clinical settings. Therefore, further study with respect to whole genome analysis is required to understand this less recognized resistance gene and its role in aminoglycoside resistance in hospital and community environments.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary material 1

Funding information

JNMF scholarship was awarded to Jayalaxmi Wangkheimayum Vide letter no; SU-1/068/2018-19/89 dated 4 December 4, 2017, and DBT project BT/PR24255/NER/95/716/2017 dated 05. 10October. 2018 and ICMR SRF to Jayalaxmi Wangkheimayum vide letter no; AMR/Fellowship/19/2019-ECD-II/ID No. 2019–3677 dated 21.08 August. 2019.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Trust and Indian Council of Medical Research for providing fellowship to Jayalaxmi Wangkheimayum and Department of Biotechnology, Government of India.

Author contribution

J.W. performed the experimental work, data collection and analysis and prepared the manuscript. A.B. supervised the research work and participated in designing the study and drafting the manuscript. P.P. did the data analysis. K.M.S. participated in sample collection and part of experiments. D.D. participated in experiment designing and manuscript correction. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The author(s) declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical statement

The study was approved by Institutional ethics committee vide Ref, No: IEC/AUS/2019/18/JW, dated 22 May 2019.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: CLED, cysteine-lactose-electrolyte-deficient agar; CLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; ESBL, extended spectrum beta lactamase; LB, Luria Bertani; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

One supplementary figure and four supplementary tables are available with the online version of this article.

References

  • 1.Waksman SA, Reilly HC, Schatz A. Strain specificity and production of antibiotic substances: V. strain resistance of bacteria to antibiotic substances, especially to streptomycin. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1945;31:157–164. doi: 10.1073/pnas.31.6.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shaw KJ, Rather PN, Hare RS, Miller GH. Molecular genetics of aminoglycoside resistance genes and familial relationships of the aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. Microbiol Rev. 1993;57:138–163. doi: 10.1128/mr.57.1.138-163.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rådström P, Swedberg G, Sköld O. Genetic analyses of sulfonamide resistance and its dissemination in gram-negative bacteria illustrate new aspects of R plasmid evolution. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:1840–1848. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.9.1840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Scholz P, Haring V, Wittmann-Liebold B, Ashman K, Bagdasarian M, et al. Complete nucleotide sequence and gene organization of the broad-host-range plasmid RSF1010. Gene. 1989;75:271–288. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90273-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pezzella C, Ricci A, DiGiannatale E, Luzzi I, Carattoli A. Tetracycline and streptomycin resistance genes, transposons, and plasmids in Salmonella enterica isolates from animals in Italy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:903–908. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.3.903-908.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sunde M, Norström M. The genetic background for streptomycin resistance in Escherichia coli influences the distribution of MICs. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56:87–90. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-first informational supplement M100-S27. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Carattoli A, Bertini A, Villa L, Falbo V, Hopkins KL, et al. Identification of plasmids by PCR-based replicon typing. J Microbiol Methods. 2005;63:219–228. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Paul D, Bhattacharjee A, Bhattacharjee D, Dhar D, Maurya AP, et al. Transcriptional analysis of bla NDM-1 and copy number alteration under carbapenem stress. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6:26. doi: 10.1186/s13756-017-0183-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sundin GW. Distinct recent lineages of the strA- strB streptomycin-resistance genes in clinical and environmental bacteria. Curr Microbiol. 2002;45:63–69. doi: 10.1007/s00284-001-0100-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sunde M. Class I integron with a group II intron detected in an Escherichia coli strain from a free-range reindeer. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:2512–2514. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.6.2512-2514.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ho PL, Leung LM, Chow KH, Lai EL, Lo WU, et al. Prevalence of aminoglycoside modifying enzyme and 16S ribosomal RNA methylase genes among aminoglycoside-resistant Escherichia coli isolates. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2016;49:123–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2014.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McMillan EA, Gupta SK, Williams LE, Jové T, Hiott LM, et al. Antimicrobial resistance genes, cassettes, and plasmids present in Salmonella enterica associated with United States food animals. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:832. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bert F, Branger C, Lambert-Zechovsky N. Identification of PSE and OXA beta-lactamase genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa using PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;50:11–18. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Colom K, Pérez J, Alonso R, Fernández-Aranguiz A, Lariño E, et al. Simple and reliable multiplex PCR assay for detection of bla TEM, bla SHV and bla OXA-1 genes in Enterobacteriaceae. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003;223:147–151. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00306-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lee S, Park YJ, Kim M, Lee HK, Han K, et al. Prevalence of Ambler class A and D beta-lactamases among clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Korea. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56:122–127. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Naas T, Vandel L, Sougakoff W, Livermore DM, Nordmann P. Cloning and sequence analysis of the gene for a carbapenem-hydrolyzing class A beta-lactamase, SME-1, from Serratia marcescens S6. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:1262–1270. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.6.1262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Woodford N, Tierno PM, Young K, Tysall L, Palepou MFI, et al. Outbreak of Klebsiella pneumoniae producing a new carbapenem-hydrolyzing class A beta-lactamase, KPC-3, in a New York Medical Center. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:4793–4799. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4793-4799.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cuzon G, Bonnin RA, Nordmann P. First identification of novel NDM carbapenemase, NDM-7, in Escherichia coli in France. PLoS One. 2013;8:e61322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Poirel L, Marqué S, Héritier C, Segonds C, Chabanon G, et al. OXA-58, a novel class D {beta}-lactamase involved in resistance to carbapenems in Acinetobacter baumannii . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:202–208. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.1.202-208.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tsakris A, Kristo I, Poulou A, Themeli-Digalaki K, Ikonomidis A, et al. Evaluation of boronic acid disk tests for differentiating KPC-possessing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in the clinical laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:362–367. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01922-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ito H, Arakawa Y, Ohsuka S, Wacharotayankun R, Kato N, et al. Plasmid-mediated dissemination of the metallo-beta-lactamase gene blaIMP among clinically isolated strains of Serratia marcescens . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:824–829. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.4.824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yong D, Toleman MA, Giske CG, Cho HS, Sundman K, et al. Characterization of a new metallo-beta-lactamase gene, bla(NDM-1), and a novel erythromycin esterase gene carried on a unique genetic structure in Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 14 from India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:5046–5054. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00774-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 1

Articles from Access Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES