Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: PM R. 2022 Jul 15;15(6):705–714. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12854

Physical Activity and Perceived Barriers in Individuals with Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Tri Pham 1,*, Rachel Green 1,*, Stephanie Neaves 2, Linda S Hynan 3, Kathleen R Bell 2, Shannon B Juengst 2,4, Rong Zhang 5,6, Simon Driver 7, Kan Ding 5
PMCID: PMC9675876  NIHMSID: NIHMS1809580  PMID: 35596121

Abstract

Introduction:

Regular physical activity (PA), especially aerobic exercise, may benefit cognitive function in middle-aged and older adults, but promoting regular PA in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a challenge.

Objective:

To characterize PA and perceived barriers to PA in younger (<45 years) and middle age and older (≥45 years) individuals ≥1 year after moderate-to-severe TBI.

Design:

Multi-center survey study

Setting:

Community

Participants:

Persons who met the following criteria were included in the study: 1) 18 years and older; 2) English speaking; 3) History of moderate-to-severe TBI; 4) Followed in a TBI Model Systems Center for at least 1 year; and 5) Able to complete the survey independently.

Intervention:

Not applicable

Main Outcome Measure(s):

Physical activity level measured by Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity questionnaire (RAPA) and self-reported barriers to PA.

Results:

472 participants completed the survey (response rate of 21%). More individuals in the younger group (<45 years old) met CDC recommended aerobic PA guidelines compared to the middle-aged and older group (≥ 45 years old) (62% vs 36%, p < 0.001). Lack of motivation, lack of time, and fatigue were the most reported barriers. Perceived barriers to PA varied by age and PA level: the middle-aged and older individuals (≥ 45 years old) were more likely to report no barriers and inactive individuals (RAPA ≤ 5) more likely to report lack of motivation and money, pain, and lack of resources.

Conclusion:

Participants of age ≥45 years were less likely to meet the CDC PA guidelines than younger individuals after moderate-to-severe TBI. As perceived barriers to PA varied between age groups and PA levels, individualized approaches may be needed to promote physical activity in this population.

Keywords: Exercise, brain injury, barriers

INTRODUCTION

Around 69 million individuals worldwide and 2.5 million in the United States sustain a traumatic brain injury (TBI) each year,1,2 representing a major public health concern and source of disability globally.2 Moderate-to-severe TBIs result in approximately 235,000 hospitalizations annually, a number increasing over time,3,4 and may lead to long-term functional and cognitive impairment.5,6 While cognition can be affected globally, specific deficits can be most notably observed with verbal fluency and delayed recall with substantial individual variability.7 Many survivors of moderate-to-severe TBIs experienced functional improvement through 1 and 2 years, followed by a decline by 5 years.79 Increasing evidence suggested that age was associated with worse functional outcome and higher risk of developing dementia after TBI.8,1012

While there is a dearth of rigorous evidence for preventing this neurodegeneration after TBI, regular physical activity (PA), especially aerobic exercise, may benefit cognitive function in middle-aged and older adults by reducing risks of cardiovascular disease and improving brain perfusion.1315 However, only 21% middle-aged (45–64 years old) and 13% older-age (≥ 65 years old) met the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) physical activity guidelines, which were lower compared to younger age groups (28% for age 35–44, 31% for age 25–34, and 34% for age 18–24).16 Little is known about how often or how intensively people with TBI engage in PA after injury.17 Prior research suggests that people with TBI generally have decreased participation in leisure and social activities after injury compared to pre-injury baseline and exhibit inadequate levels of PA.1719 However, these studies have been based on small sample sizes with geographic bias and didn’t address the age difference in PA levels.

Several small studies have also found that regular aerobic PA may attenuate the neurodegenerative process and improve mood symptoms in individuals with TBI.2024 Yet, despite these promising benefits, promoting regular aerobic PA in individuals with TBI remains a challenge.21 Pilot studies assessing the feasibility of exercise programs in the population with TBI have reported challenges to recruitment as well as poor adherence to the prescribed programs.25,26 Therefore, identifying perceived barriers to PA, is crucial to the success of future clinical trials studying the efficacy of programs for promoting PA in people with TBI.

Prior smaller studies have reported that general barriers to PA in individuals with TBI include self-consciousness and lack of gym accessibility, time, knowledge, energy, and motivation27,28, and suggested that these barriers vary by age.29 However, no large studies have examined barriers to PA in individuals with moderate-to-severe TBI, especially in middle-aged and older individuals with moderate-to-severe TBI who may benefit from regular physical activity the most.

To address these limitations, this study aimed to characterize PA levels and perceived barriers to PA in middle-aged and older (≥ 45 years) and younger (18–44 years) individuals after moderate-to-severe TBI in a multi-center cohort.

METHODS

Participants

This prospective study surveyed participants enrolled in the TBI Model Systems (TBIMS) program30 who met the following criteria: 1) 18 years old and older at injury; 2) English speaking; 3) prospectively followed at a TBIMS Center for at least 1 year post-injury; and 4) consented to be reached via email or text message. Participants were excluded from the study if they: 1) could not complete a survey online or via telephone independently, or 2) were not fluent in English. All TBIMS participants met the criteria for moderate-to-severe TBI which was defined as history of moderate to severe TBI defined as posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) >24 hours, loss of consciousness (LOC) >30 minutes, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) <13, or intracranial neuroimaging abnormalities within 72 hours prior to hospital admission.31 Eight TBIMS sites recruited for this study. A total of 2665 eligible participants were identified at these sites.

Survey Design

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the primary site. Local approvals from other TBIMS sites were obtained if required. A customized survey and data entry form were created in the REDCap database at the primary study site.32 The survey assessed the following:

Physical Activity Level

The Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA) questionnaire, captured via REDCap, measured current PA level. RAPA is consistent with Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) physical activity guidelines recommending 30 minutes or more of moderate activity on most days or every day.33 It demonstrated strong criterion validity for assessing PA among adults including those older than 50 years.34 RAPA has been used with multiple populations across the lifespan, including individuals with TBI and depression.26,3537 Participants are first shown a visual prompt describing types of light (i.e. leisure walking, stretching, light house/yard work), moderate (i.e. fast/brisk walking, aerobics class, strength training), and vigorous activities (i.e. jogging, running, tennis), then respond to questions measuring level and frequency of aerobic activities. Only the items relating to aerobic exercise were included in scoring, although participants were asked about strength and flexibility exercises. RAPA score was determined based on the highest level and frequency of reported aerobic activities. RAPA scores range from 1 to 7, with scores ≤5 denoting sedentary to underactive (inactive) lifestyles and scores ≥ 6 denoting active lifestyles34. RAPA questionnaires were scored by two researchers independently and three cases with discordant RAPA scores were discussed to obtain an agreement.

Perceived Barriers to Physical Activity

Potential barriers to PA for participants were identified using a checklist of 14 perceived barriers generated from a prior study in patients with acquired brain injury.27 Subjects were asked to mark all potential barriers that applied to them. The perceived barriers were categorized into: a) knowledge barriers (lack of knowledge of how or where to exercise); b) personal barriers (lack of motivation, fatigue, and fear of injury); c) environmental barriers (lack of time and lack of money); and d) miscellaneous (no barriers and other) (Table 2)

Table 2.

Characterization of physical activities and perceived barriers to physical activity reported (N=472)

Variable Level Total at Level
n (%)
*PA type No Physical Activity 27 (6%)
Light Activity House and yard work 317 (67%)
Leisure walking 315 (67%)
Flexibility exercises 169 (36%)
Moderate Activity Muscular strength and muscular endurance exercises 187 (40%)
Aerobic and fitness classes 39 (8%)
Vigorous Activity Aerobic Activities (i.e., fast walking, jogging, running, biking) 178 (38%)
Active sports 70 (15%)
Other 49 (10%)
*Where do you exercise? Home 348 (74%)
Gym 131 (28%)
Outdoors 272 (58%)
PT/OT Sessions 14 (3%)
Other 32 (7%)
Frequency of PA Never 10 (2%)
≤1/week 37 (8%)
2–3/week 142 (31%)
4–5/week 119 (26%)
>5/week 144 (32%)
How long have you been doing PA regularly? <1 month 52 (12%)
1–6 months 59 (13%)
12–14 months 53 (12%)
>2 years 288 (64%)
Perceived barriers to physical activity
Knowledge barriers* Seeing no need for exercise 10 (2%)
Lack of knowledge of how or where to exercise 14 (3%)
Personal barriers* Lack of motivation 119 (25%)
Fatigue 95 (20%)
Pain 59 (13%)
Fear of injury 32 (7%)
Fear of worsening condition 18 (4%)
Discomfort at gym 12 (3%)
Lack of time 99 (21%)
Environmental barriers* Limited access to gym 40 (8%)
Lack of money 22 (5%)
Lack of necessary resources 21 (4%)
Miscellaneous* No Barriers 158 (33%)
Other 52 (11%)
*

Participants were allowed to select multiple responses for this category. PA: physical activity

Demographic Data

Age, sex, education level, state of residence, employment, living situation, income, driving ability, and use of assistive devices were collected. As generally accepted in lifespan and aging literature, participants were further grouped by age: the younger group representing early adulthood and early middle age between 18–44 years old, and the middle-aged and older group (≥ 45 years old) representing late middle age (45–64 years) and late adulthood (65 years and older).16,38

The survey was reviewed by two consumer advisory groups – the North Texas TBIMS Consumer Advisory Board and the Parkland Hospital Community Advisory Panel – representing the TBI and general patient populations respectively. The purpose of these reviews was to ensure that the language was easily understandable by consumers. A public link to the REDCap survey was sent to eligible participants via email or text message. The full survey is available as supplemental material.

Statistical Analyses

Data were analyzed using descriptive and summary statistics. Chi-squared analyses were used to compare PA levels and perceived barriers between younger and middle-aged and older groups, and perceived barriers between inactive (RAPA ≤ 5) and active groups (RAPA ≥6). A multivariable logistic regression was conducted with all potential demographic and barrier variables included into the model to identify associations with active PA level (RAPA scores ≥6). Because some categories had small frequencies, certain categories were combined as follows: Age 18–34, Age 65+, and <High School/High School or GED. A stepwise model was initially fit to the data that included variables significant at p<0.15, then a final model was fit to the data retaining only those variables significant at p<0.05. The overall significance level was set at p < 0.05. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 26.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY).

RESULTS

Demographic Data

A total of 2665 surveys were sent out during February 2020 and September 2020, and 472 participants completed the survey (21% response rate). Participant demographic data are listed in Table 1. Fifty percent of participants were 18–44 years old, while the remaining 50% were ≥45 years old. Most participants were male (66.7%) and had at least partial college or vocational training (80.5%). Thirty-seven percent had an annual household income <$50,000. Nearly half were employed part-time or full-time, while 18% and 20% were unemployed or retired, respectively. Most participants lived with other individuals (78%) and were able to drive independently with no distance restrictions (75%). Most participants (80%) did not use an assistive device to walk.

Table 1.

Demographics of survey participants (N=472)

Variable Level Total at Level
n (%)
Age Group 18–34 129 (27%)
35–44 106 (22%)
45–54 81 (17%)
55–64 83 (18%)
≥ 65 72 (15%)
Sex Male 315 (67%)
Female 154 (33%)
Other 3 (1%)
Education ≤ High School or GED 92 (19%)
Some college, vocational training, or Associate’s degree 165 (35%)
Bachelor 118 (25%)
Masters or Doctorate 97 (20%)
*Work Situation Student 28 (6%)
Unemployed 87 (18%)
Part-time 45 (10%)
Full-time 176 (37%)
Self-employed 36 (8%)
Retired 96 (20%)
Other 53 (11%)
Houshold Income < $49,999 171 (37%)
$50,000 − $100,000 119 (25%)
>$100,000 99 (21%)
Prefer not to say 83 (18%)
Living Situation Lives Alone 98 (21%)
Lives with others 368 (78%)
Living in an Assisted Living facility 6 (1%)
*Driving Situation Drives everywhere 354 (75%)
Driven by family and friends 87 (18%)
Takes bus or DART 36 (8%)
Drives short distances (<5 miles) 31 (7%)
Takes Uber or Lyft 29 (6%)
Takes disability-specific transportation 9 (2%)
Assistive Device No device 379 (80%)
Walker 2 (0%)
Braces 10 (2%)
Cane 24 (5%)
Wheelchair 9 (2%)
Orthotic 9 (2%)
Other 5 (1%)
More than one 39 (8%)
*

Participants were allowed to select multiple responses for this category

Physical Activity Level

Characterization of physical activity is listed in Table 2. The most commonly reported activities were light PA, including house and yard work and leisure walking (each reported by >65%), followed by flexibility and strength training exercises (each reported by > 35%). Thirty-six percent of participants reported engaging in aerobic activities, like running or biking. The majority (90%) reported that they engaged in PA at least twice a week, and 64% reported that they had been regularly participating in PA for over 2 years.

Most (55%) participants did not meet the CDC recommendations for weekly aerobic physical activity, with a RAPA score ≤ 5. Over 40% reported complete inactivity, sporadic light-moderate activity, or weekly light activity. Younger adults (< 45 years) more often met the CDC PA guidelines, (n=138, 58%) than did the middle-aged and older individuals (≥45 years) (n=76, 32%) (p <0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Physical activity level and perceived barriers to physical activity by age group

Age Groups 18 – 44 45+ p
Physical Activity Level
RAPA (n, %) ≤ 5 98 (42 %) 160 (68 %) < 0.001
≥ 6 138 (58%) 76 (32%)
Barriers to exercise *
No barriers (n, %) 62 (26 %) 96 (41%) 0.001
Lack of time (n, %) 73 (31 %) 26 (11%) <0.001
Discomfort at gym (n, %) 24 (10 %) 16 (7%) 0.04
Fatigue (n, %) 65 (28 %) 30 (13 %) < 0.001
*

Participants were allowed to select multiple responses. Chi-squared analysis was used to compare the group difference. Only barriers with statistical significance (p < 0.05) were presented in the table.

Perceived Barriers to Physical Activity

Perceived barriers to PA are presented in Table 2. Personal barriers were most frequently reported, as 25% reported lack of motivation, lack of time (21%), or fatigue (20%). Thirty-three percent of participants reported “no barrier, I exercise regularly”.

Several age-related differences were identified. For example, the younger group cited fatigue, lack of time, and discomfort in the gym as perceived barriers more frequently than the middle-aged and older group (all p <0.05) (Table 3). Middle-aged and older adults were significantly more likely to report no barriers to PA than younger adults (p <0.01) (Table 3).

PA level-related differences were also identified. The inactive individuals (RAPA≤5) were more likely to report lack of motivation, lack of money, lack of necessary resources, and pain as perceived barriers compared to the active individuals (RAPA ≥6) (p<0.01). Active individuals were more likely to report no barriers (all p <0.01).

Multivariable Logistic Regression

The following potentially relevant demographic and barrier variables were included in a multivariable logistic regression model: age, sex, education, work situation, household income, living situation, driving situation, the use of an assistive device, and all perceived barriers listed in the survey. Among these variables, only age and education level distribution were significantly different between physically active (RAPA ≥ 6) and inactive groups (RAPA ≤5) (p < 0.001 for age and p= 0.004 for education respectively). The final model showed a significant association between PA and age and education (Table 4). Together these variables resulted in an excellent fit of the model to the data (Hosmer-Lemeshow p=0.689). As expected, younger age was associated with higher levels of PA; individuals 18–34 years of age were 8.09 (OR 95% CI: 3.65–17.94) and individuals 35–44 of age were 8.87 (OR 95% CI: 3.90–20.15) times more likely to be active than those who were 65+ years old. Higher levels of education were associated with higher levels of PA; individuals with Master’s degrees were 3.98 times more likely (OR 95% CI: 1.87–8.47) to be physically active (RAPA ≥ 6) than those with less than or equal to high school/GED education. Those reporting no barriers were 9.15 (OR 95% CI: 5.40–15.51) times more likely to be physically active ( RAPA ≥6) compared to those reporting one or more barriers, while those reporting lack of time were 2.13 (OR 95% CI: 1.23–3.70) times more likely to be physically active than those reporting having enough time.

Table 4.

Multivariable logistic regression model to evaluate the relationship between physical activity level and age, education, and perceived barriers to physical activity

Variables Odds ratio 95% CI
Age [ref:65+]
 18–34 8.09 3.65–17.94
 35–44 8.87 3.90–20.15
 45–54 1.76 0.78–3.99
 55–64 1.56 0.69–3.51
Education [ref: ≤ High School/GED]
 Some college, vocational training, or associate degree 1.17 0.63–2.2
 Bachelor’s degree 3.06 1.58–5.96
 Master’s degree 3.98 1.87–8.47
 Doctoral degree 2.95 0.93–9.40
Barriers
 Lack of time (vs having enough time) 2.13 1.23–3.70
 No barrier (vs any barrier) 9.15 5.40–15.51

DISCUSSION

We characterized PA levels in people after moderate-to-severe TBI in a large multicenter sample, identifying important differences in perceived barriers to PA by age and between those able to meet versus not meet recommended CDC guidelines for aerobic activity. Our data suggest that: 1) middle-aged and older individuals with TBI (≥45) were more likely not to meet the CDC PA guidelines but perceive less barriers to PA; 2) perceived barriers to PA vary by PA level.

Physical Activity Level in TBI

In our cohort, only 45% of participants met the CDC-recommended minimum aerobic PA level, while, in the general population, 54% of individuals meet these guidelines.39,40 However, a higher proportion of young adults (18–44 years) in this cohort met PA recommendations compared to the general population of the same age range, as reported by CDC in 2011 (65% vs 50–57%).41 This difference may represent the nationwide trend of 0.9%/year increase in meeting the PA guideline in the past decade.40 On the other hand, the guideline adherence in our middle-aged and older group (35%) was much lower when compared to the same age group in the general population (51–53% in age group 45 and older) reported in 2011.41 As in the general population,42 we also observed that PA guideline adherence is inversely correlated with age. Our results suggest there is a need to promote regular PA in individuals with TBI older than 45.

Perceived barriers to physical activity by age

The most common barriers to PA in our cohort were motivation, time, and fatigue, similar to what other studies have reported in TBI populations.27,43 However, these barriers were not the same across age groups. In our cohort, younger individuals reported lack of time more frequently than the older group. Younger participants were also more likely to report discomfort in the gym, which may be due to self-conscious emotions of embarrassment becoming less problematic with older age.44, 45 Finally, the younger group also cited fatigue more frequently than the middle-aged and older group, which is the opposite from what might be expected. This may be related to the idea that middle-aged and older adults are significantly more likely to perceive their health in a positive manner than are younger adults.46,47

Interestingly, adults older than 45 years more frequently reported no barriers despite being less likely to meet PA recommendations than younger individuals. This may be due to older adults’ perception of their PA participation to be satisfactory for their age, which is consistent with the aforementioned idea of more positive perception of health with increasing age. Another contributing explanation may relate to knowledge of PA recommendations. Most individuals, especially older adults, are unable to accurately identify guidelines for aerobic PA,4851 with a large number underestimating the minimum recommendations49 – thus, many may incorrectly assume their current activity to be sufficient. Additionally, as we did not explore beliefs surrounding the efficacy of exercise in this survey, participants who reported no barriers also may have been unaware of the benefits of regular PA.27 This potential lack of knowledge in both PA benefits and guidelines reinforces the importance of increased education in encouraging PA participation. While knowledge alone may not be sufficient to promote behavior change, it allows individuals to make more health-informed decisions,52 and may be a critical step to promote regular PA at the recommended level for TBI survivors.

The relationship between perceived barriers to physical activity and age can be complex, and age-related barrier differences may also inform the individualization of health interventions to target demographics. Individualized exercise interventions with a self-management component may be considered to address the unique barriers faced by each participant.

Perceived barriers to physical activity by PA level

In this survey, we also observed that the perceived barriers varied by physical activity level. For instance, less active participants cited motivation, pain, cost, and resources as barriers more so than more active participants, suggesting that targeting those concerns may boost PA. However, the potential multifactorial origins of these concerns may create challenges. Lack of motivation can arise from frontal dysexecutive syndrome, mood disorders, pain symptoms, and general fatigue after TBI, while pain can stem from prior injuries or health conditions. While not captured in this survey, chronic medical conditions and their associated pharmacological interventions may also contribute to these barriers, especially as many conditions and drugs can cause fatigue and amotivation. Issues with cost and resources may be linked to factors influencing socioeconomic status, such as employment and education. Unfortunately, individuals with TBI often experience high rates of chronic pain, mood disorders, psychiatric illnesses, unemployment, and reliance on financial assistance.53,54 Therefore, effective strategies to promote PA may require consideration of the increased burden of physical, mental, and socioeconomic issues in TBI survivors with inactive lifestyles, and identification of the unique contributing etiologies to address these barriers appropriately.

Surprisingly, participants who reported being active were also more likely to report lack of PA knowledge. Therefore, it may be useful to assess baseline PA knowledge prior to exercise program initiation.

Limitations and Future Directions

Our study has several limitations. First, our sample may not be representative of the overall population with TBI due to our recruitment method. The survey was primarily disseminated through electronic means, which may be biased towards self-selected higher-functioning individuals or those with more resources as demonstrated by the demographic data (i.e. 21% above $100,000 for household annual income, 45% with either a bachelor or master’s degree, and 21% living alone). As a result, individuals with severe disabilities (and thus lower activity level) may be less likely to have been captured in the data. Additionally, only 20% of eligible participants responded to our survey, and the other 80% of may have unique characteristics. RAPA has not been modified to reflect the changes in the CDC physical activity guidelines for older adults (65 years and older) with comorbidities (i.e. TBI), which encourage this population to be physically active as their abilities and conditions allow if they cannot do 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity a week.13 Therefore, some of the older adults in our cohort may be meeting the modified activity guidelines. The survey was written in English and non-English speaking individuals with TBI were not included in this study. Some information regarding potential contributing variables such as race/ethnicity and the time of the initial injury were not collected in the survey. Therefore, the generalizability of the results of this study may be limited. Second, despite efforts to ensure clarity, our survey may have presented challenges to individuals with TBI, who may exhibit greater cognitive impairment than the general population. Design differences also limited direct comparisons to prior studies. For instance, our survey had an option to denote “No barrier, I am exercising regularly” while the survey used in other studies, such as Pinto et al.,28 did not. Because one-third of our participants chose that response exclusively, the prevalence of barriers in our study was much lower than found in other studies. It is unclear if these differences arose from population or survey differences. The self-reporting nature of the survey did not allow researchers to determine if the barriers were objectively present. The survey also limited the breadth of barriers reported to the ones listed, and therefore, may not have captured other salient obstacles. Third, because of the subjective nature of survey responses, future research should focus on more objective measures of PA, such as the use of activity or heart rate monitors to better assess PA level in individuals with TBI.55,56 Fourth, only a small portion of participants between 18–34 and > 65 years of age were included in this survey. This can be partially explained by the typical age distribution of TBI survivors but may also relate to willingness to participate (especially in younger individuals) or lack of technology literacy (especially in older adults). Further studies will be needed to address the barriers to physical activity in these age groups. Finally, this survey was conducted during the COVID pandemic, therefore COVID-related restriction and social distancing might affect the reported physical activity habits (i.e. “where do you exercise”) and perceived barriers.

Despite these limitations, our study provides valuable insight for the design of future exercise programs/trials and for clinical practice to promote PA in individuals with TBI. Our study suggests that an effort may need to be made to educate and mobilize the middle-aged and older individuals with TBI. Knowledge of potential barriers may help clinicians tailor problem-solving therapy (PST) to patients. PST is a self-management intervention that has been shown to be an effective adjunctive treatment for improving self-efficacy for PA in many populations,5761 helping participants to develop strategies to address specific obstacles and promoting motivation. Technology-based strategies may also be effective not only in increasing PA but also promoting adherence.62 While not yet studied in individuals with TBI, elements of existing web- and app-based approaches have been shown to effectively address the common needs that were detailed in our study. For instance, gamified technological experiences have been shown to increase motivation, self-efficacy, PA enjoyment, and energy in both younger and older age groups.6365 A centralized electronic platform for organized information may also bridge the knowledge gap that many individuals with TBI may face.

Conclusions

This large multicenter survey study in individuals with moderate-to-severe TBI demonstrated that middle-aged and older persons with TBI are more likely not to meet the CDC PA guideline than younger adults. Perceived barriers to PA vary by age and PA level, with fatigue, lack of motivation, and time being the most often reported barriers. Our findings provide valuable information for future clinical trials and clinical practice to promote regular PA in this population.

Supplementary Material

supinfo

Acknowledgement:

We thank all the participants in this study. We also thank all TBIMS participants and investigators: Cynthia Dunklin, Baylor Scott & White Institute for Rehabilitation; , Cindy Harrison-Felix and Shelby Mann, Rocky Mountain Regional Brain Injury System; Flora Hammond, Rebecca Runkel, and Darby Dyar, Indiana University/Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana; Yelena Goldin, JFK Johnson Rehabilitation Institute TBIMS; Ben Dirlikov, Jame Crew, and Thao Duong, Northern California TBIMS; Amy Wagner, Daniel Rusnak, and Kimberli Huster, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center TBIMS; Shanti Pinto, Tami Guerrier, and Kimberly Welsh, Carolinas Rehabilitation TBIMS Follow-up Site; Dmitry Esterov and Allen Brown, Mayo Clinic TBIMS.

Acknowledgement of financial support:

This study is supported by National Institute on Aging (grant# R34AG061304 to KB, RZ, LH, SJ, and KD) and in part by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (90DPTB0013–01-00). REDCap data entry/capture was supported by CTSA NIH Grant UL1-RR024982.

Abbreviations:

CDC

Center for Disease Control and Prevention

IRB

Institutional Review Board

PA

physical activity

PST

problem-solving training

RAPA

Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity

TBI

traumatic brain injury

TBIMS

TBI Model Systems

Reference:

  • 1.Control CfD, Prevention. Report to congress on traumatic brain injury in the United States: epidemiology and rehabilitation. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. 2015:1–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S, et al. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. Journal of neurosurgery. 2018;130(4):1080–1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Faul M, Coronado V. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Handbook of clinical neurology. 2015;127:3–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hyder AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, Gururaj G, Kobusingye OC. The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22(5):341–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.O’Neil-Pirozzi TM, Ketchum JM, Hammond FM, Philippus A, Weber E, Dams-O’Connor K. Physical, cognitive, and psychosocial characteristics associated with mortality in chronic TBI survivors: a National Institute on disability, independent living, and rehabilitation research traumatic brain injury model systems study. The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation. 2018;33(4):237–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Corrigan JD, Hammond FM. Traumatic brain injury as a chronic health condition. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2013;94(6):1199–1201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Till C, Colella B, Verwegen J, Green RE. Postrecovery cognitive decline in adults with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(12 Suppl):S25–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dams-OʼConnor K, Ketchum JM, Cuthbert JP, et al. Functional Outcome Trajectories Following Inpatient Rehabilitation for TBI in the United States: A NIDILRR TBIMS and CDC Interagency Collaboration. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2020;35(2):127–139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hammond FM, Hart T, Bushnik T, Corrigan JD, Sasser H. Change and predictors of change in communication, cognition, and social function between 1 and 5 years after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2004;19(4):314–328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gardner RC, Burke JF, Nettiksimmons J, Kaup A, Barnes DE, Yaffe K. Dementia risk after traumatic brain injury vs nonbrain trauma: the role of age and severity. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71(12):1490–1497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Graham NS, Sharp DJ. Understanding neurodegeneration after traumatic brain injury: from mechanisms to clinical trials in dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90(11):1221–1233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.LoBue C, Munro C, Schaffert J, et al. Traumatic brain injury and risk of long-term brain changes, accumulation of pathological markers, and developing dementia: a review. Journal of Alzheimer’s disease. 2019;70(3):629–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, et al. The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 2018;320(19):2020–2028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tomoto T, Tarumi T, Chen JN, Hynan LS, Cullum CM, Zhang R. One-year aerobic exercise altered cerebral vasomotor reactivity in mild cognitive impairment. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021;131(1):119–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tarumi T, Gonzales MM, Fallow B, et al. Cerebral/Peripheral Vascular Reactivity and Neurocognition in Middle-Age Athletes. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2015;47(12). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Whitfield GP, Carlson SA, Ussery EN, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, Petersen R. Trends in Meeting Physical Activity Guidelines Among Urban and Rural Dwelling Adults - United States, 2008–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(23):513–518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hamilton M, Khan M, Clark R, Williams G, Bryant A. Predictors of physical activity levels of individuals following traumatic brain injury remain unclear: a systematic review. Brain injury. 2016;30(7):819–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wise EK, Mathews-Dalton C, Dikmen S, et al. Impact of traumatic brain injury on participation in leisure activities. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2010;91(9):1357–1362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Reavenall S, Blake H. Determinants of physical activity participation following traumatic brain injury. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation. 2010;17(7):360–369. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chin LM, Keyser RE, Dsurney J, Chan L. Improved cognitive performance following aerobic exercise training in people with traumatic brain injury. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2015;96(4):754–759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hoffman JM, Bell KR, Powell JM, et al. A randomized controlled trial of exercise to improve mood after traumatic brain injury. PM&R. 2010;2(10):911–919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schwandt M, Harris JE, Thomas S, Keightley M, Snaiderman A, Colantonio A. Feasibility and effect of aerobic exercise for lowering depressive symptoms among individuals with traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation. 2012;27(2):99–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Weinstein AA, Chin LM, Collins J, Goel D, Keyser RE, Chan L. Effect of aerobic exercise training on mood in people with traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation. 2017;32(3):E49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Driver S, Ede A. Impact of physical activity on mood after TBI. Brain Inj. 2009;23(3):203–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hassett LM, Tate RL, Moseley AM, Gillett LE. Injury severity, age and pre-injury exercise history predict adherence to a home-based exercise programme in adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain injury. 2011;25(7–8):698–706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ding K, Tarumi T, Tomoto T, et al. A proof-of-concept trial of a community-based aerobic exercise program for individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain injury. 2020:1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Driver S, Ede A, Dodd Z, Stevens L, Warren AM. What barriers to physical activity do individuals with a recent brain injury face? Disability and health journal. 2012;5(2):117–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pinto SM, Newman MA, Hirsch MA. Perceived barriers to exercise in adults with traumatic brain injury vary by age. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2018;3(3):47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pinto SM, Newman MA, Hirsch MA. Perceived Barriers to Exercise in Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury Vary by Age. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2018;3(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dijkers MP, Marwitz JH, Harrison-Felix C. Thirty Years of National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Center Research-An Update. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018;33(6):363–374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. https://www.tbindsc.org/Default.aspx.
  • 32.Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Topolski TD, LoGerfo J, Patrick DL, Williams B, Walwick J, Patrick MB. The Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA) among older adults. Prev Chronic Dis. 2006;3(4):A118. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Topolski TD, LoGerfo J, Patrick DL, Williams B, Walwick J, Patrick MMB. Peer reviewed: the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA) among older adults. Preventing chronic disease. 2006;3(4). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gardner RC, Peltz CB, Kenney K, Covinsky KE, Diaz-Arrastia R, Yaffe K. Remote Traumatic Brain Injury Is Associated with Motor Dysfunction in Older Military Veterans. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72(9):1233–1238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Watrous JR, McCabe CT, Dougherty AL, et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Service Women Injured on Combat Deployment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;18(1):39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Carli V, Wasserman D, Hadlaczky G, et al. A protocol for a multicentre, parallel-group, pragmatic randomised controlled trial to evaluate the NEVERMIND system in preventing and treating depression in patients with severe somatic conditions. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):93–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Medley ML. Life satisfaction across four stages of adult life. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1980;11(3):193–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Whitfield GP, Carlson SA, Ussery EN, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, Petersen R. Trends in meeting physical activity guidelines among urban and rural dwelling adults—United States, 2008–2017. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2019;68(23):513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.CDC. Trends in meeting the 2008 physical activity guidelines, 2008–2017. US Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/downloads/trends-in-the-prevalence-of-physical-activity-508.pdf. Published 2018. Accessed. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Report CMaMW. Adult Participation in Arobic and Muscle-Strenthening Physical Activities- United States, 2011. Published 2013. Accessed. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Takagi D, Nishida Y, Fujita D. Age-associated changes in the level of physical activity in elderly adults. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(12):3685–3687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hamilton M, Khan M, Clark R, Williams G, Bryant A. Predictors of physical activity levels of individuals following traumatic brain injury remain unclear: A systematic review. Brain Inj. 2016;30(7):819–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lamarche L, Gammage KL, Ozimok B. The gym as a culture of body achievement: Exploring negative and positive body image experiences in men attending university. SAGE Open. 2018;8(2):2158244018778103. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Henry JD, von Hippel W, Nangle MR, Waters M. Age and the experience of strong self-conscious emotion. Aging & mental health. 2018;22(4):497–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cockerham WC, Sharp K, Wilcox JA. Aging and perceived health status. Journal of Gerontology. 1983;38(3):349–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Idler EL. Age differences in self–assessments of health: age changes, cohort differences, or survivorship? Journal of gerontology. 1993;48(6):S289–S300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Morrow JR Jr, Krzewinski-Malone JA, Jackson AW, Bungum TJ, FitzGerald SJ. American adults’ knowledge of exercise recommendations. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2004;75(3):231–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kay MC, Carroll DD, Carlson SA, Fulton JE. Awareness and knowledge of the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2014;11(4):693–698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Moore LV, Fulton J, Kruger J, McDivitt J. Knowledge of Physical Activity Guidelines Among Adults in the United States, HealthStyles 2003− 2005. Journal of physical activity and health. 2010;7(2):141–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Knox EC, Musson H, Adams EJ. Knowledge of physical activity recommendations in adults employed in England: associations with individual and workplace-related predictors. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2015;12(1):1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Vega WA, Sallis JF, Patterson T, Joan R, Atkins C, Nader PR. Assessing knowledge of cardiovascular health-related diet and exercise behaviors in Anglo-and Mexican-Americans. Prev Med. 1987;16(5):696–709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ellis R, Kosma M, Cardinal BJ, Bauer JJ, McCubbin JA. Physical activity beliefs and behaviour of adults with physical disabilities. Disability and rehabilitation. 2007;29(15):1221–1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Nampiaparampil DE. Prevalence of chronic pain after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. JAMA. 2008;300(6):711–719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Geraedts HAE, Dijkstra H, Zhang W, et al. Effectiveness of an individually tailored home-based exercise rogramme for pre-frail older adults, driven by a tablet application and mobility monitoring: a pilot study. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2021;18(1):10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Katzan I, Schuster A, Kinzy T. Physical Activity Monitoring Using a Fitbit Device in Ischemic Stroke Patients: Prospective Cohort Feasibility Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(1):e14494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Artistico D, Pinto AM, Douek J, Black J, Pezzuti L. The Value of Removing Daily Obstacles via Everyday Problem-Solving Theory: Developing an Applied Novel Procedure to Increase Self-Efficacy for Exercise. Front Psychol. 2013;4:20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bombardier CH, Bell KR, Temkin NR, Fann JR, Hoffman J, Dikmen S. The efficacy of a scheduled telephone intervention for ameliorating depressive symptoms during the first year after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24(4):230–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Powell JM, Fraser R, Brockway JA, Temkin N, Bell KR. A Telehealth Approach to Caregiver Self-Management Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016;31(3):180–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kurowski BG, Taylor HG, McNally KA, et al. Online Family Problem-Solving Therapy (F-PST) for Executive and Behavioral Dysfunction After Traumatic Brain Injury in Adolescents: A Randomized, Multicenter, Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2020;35(3):165–174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bell KR, Fann JR, Brockway JA, et al. Telephone Problem Solving for Service Members with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized, Clinical Trial. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34(2):313–321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Connelly J, Kirk A, Masthoff J, MacRury S. The use of technology to promote physical activity in Type 2 diabetes management: a systematic review. Diabetic Medicine. 2013;30(12):1420–1432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kappen D, Mirza-Babaei P, Nacke L. Gamification of older adults’ physical activity: an eight-week study. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kappen DL, Mirza-Babaei P, Nacke LE. Gamification through the application of motivational affordances for physical activity technology. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kari T, Piippo J, Frank L, Makkonen M, Moilanen P. To gamify or not to gamify?: Gamification in exercise applications and its role in impacting exercise motivation. BLED 2016: Proceedings of the 29th Bled eConference” Digital Economy”, ISBN 978-961-232-287-8. 2016. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supinfo

RESOURCES