Abstract
Background/Aim: Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) is a type of soft-tissue sarcoma with a poor prognosis due to distant metastasis and resistance to chemotherapy. The antimalarial drug chloroquine (CQ) can induce apoptosis in cancer cells. CQ in combination with rapamycin (RAPA), an mTOR inhibitor, has shown efficacy on osteosarcoma and other types of cancer. In the present study the efficacy of RAPA combined with CQ on the treatment of a DDLS patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model was investigated.
Materials and Methods: A patient-derived DDLS was transplanted into the left retroperitoneum of nude mice to establish a DDLS PDOX nude-mouse model. The mice were randomly divided as follows: untreated control group; CQ group; RAPA group; combined CQ and RAPA group (n=7 for all groups). During the treatment period, tumor volume was measured every 3-4 days with calipers. After 2 weeks treatment, the mice were sacrificed, and H&E staining was performed for histological evaluation. The TUNEL assay was performed to detect apoptosis.
Results: The combination of CQ and RAPA arrested tumor growth in the DDLS PDOX compared to the untreated control (p=0.009) and was significantly more effective than RAPA alone (p=0.009). RAPA alone slowed tumor growth, but the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). CQ was not active alone (p>0.05). The number of apoptotic TUNEL-positive cells was significantly higher in the CQ plus RAPA group than in the other groups (p=0.02).
Conclusion: Combination therapy with CQ and RAPA arrested tumor growth in a DDLS PDOX model by inducing apoptosis.
Keywords: Dedifferentiated liposarcoma, PDOX, patient-derived orthotopic xenograft, combination therapy, mTOR inhibitors, rapamycin, chloroquine, apoptosis
Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) has a poor prognosis due to distant metastasis and resistance to chemotherapy (1,2). For patients with recurrent or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma, ifosfamide and doxorubicin are first-line treatment (3-7), but with limited efficacy (1).
Our laboratory established the technique of surgical orthotopic implantation in 1988, pioneering the patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) mouse model (8,9). We have shown that the PDOX mouse model, unlike the subcutaneous PDX mouse model, retains the metastatic potential of the original tumor after transplantation in nude mice (9,10).
Rapamycin (RAPA), a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, is used in transplant medicine as an immunosuppressive agent (11), as well as for treatment of renal cell carcinoma (12). mTOR plays a central role in the regulation of various cellular functions such as survival and proliferation (13). We have previously demonstrated the anticancer effects of mTOR inhibitors in combination with multiple agents in PDOX mouse models of osteosarcoma (14,15).
Chloroquine (CQ) is an antimalarial drug developed in Germany in 1934 (16). CQ is an autophagy inhibitor and can induce apoptosis in cancer cells (17). Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of CQ in combination with cancer-chemotherapy drugs in metastatic prostate cancer cell lines and hepatocarcinoma cell lines via increased apoptosis (18,19). The combination of CQ and the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus has shown efficacy in solid tumors and melanoma, in a Phase I clinical trial (20).
In the present study, we established a PDOX mouse model of DDLS and investigated the efficacy of combination treatment with CQ and RAPA.
Materials and Methods
Animals. Athymic (nu/nu) nude male mice, 4-6 weeks old, (AntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) were used under an AntiCancer, Inc. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocol. This was specifically approved for the present study, which followed the principles and procedures outlined in the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Animals, Assurance No. A3873-1.
Patient-derived tumor. The DDLS surgical specimen was from a primary retroperitoneal DDLS in a male in his 80s. The patient previously underwent surgical resection. The patient’s tumor was provided as a discarded pathology specimen at the Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA (UCLA). All experiments were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and regulations on human research. Informed consent was obtained from the patient as part of a UCLA Institutional Review board approval protocol to obtain the tumor specimen (IRB #10-001857).
Establishment of a DDLS PDOX nude-mouse model. The tumor was minced to approximately 40 mm3 in size (Figure 1). All surgical procedures were performed under anesthesia induced by a ketamine mixture. After anesthesia, a 1.5 cm incision was made in the left retroperitoneum (Figure 2A), and a 40 mm3 tumor was implanted on the retroperitoneum in the back of the kidney (Figure 2B). The wound was closed with 5-0 nylon sutures (Figure 2C). The tumor grew to 50-100 mm3 in size within 10 days of implantation and could be measured through the skin (Figure 2D).
Figure 1. Minced fragments of dedifferentiated liposarcoma tumor tissue and surrounding normal tissue prepared for orthotopic implantation.

Figure 2. Establishment of a dedifferentiated liposarcoma patient-derived orthotopic xenograft model. (A) Left retroperitoneal incision of approx. 1.5 cm. White arrow indicates left kidney. (B) The tumor was sutured to the fatty tissue of the retroperitoneum in the back of the kidney with an 8-0 nylon suture. White arrow indicates the implanted tumor fragment. (C) The wound was closed with 5-0 nylon sutures. (D) White arrow indicates tumor grown to approximately 70 mm3, 10 days after transplantation.
Reagents. Rapamycin (HY-10219) (MedChemExpress, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) was dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 4.8% Tween 80, 4.8% polyethylene glycol 400 and 4% ethanol. Chloroquine diphosphate (C6628) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in PBS.
Treatment schedule. Ten days after orthotopic transplantation, treatment was initiated when tumor volume reached 50-100 mm3 and continued for 15 days. The DDLS-PDOX mouse model was randomly assigned to four groups of 7 mice per group as follows: untreated control; CQ [100.0 mg/kg/day, intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection]; RAPA (1.0 mg/kg/day, i.p. injection); combination of CQ (100.0 mg/kg/day, i.p. injection) and RAPA (1.0 mg/kg/day, i.p. injection) (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Treatment scheme. CQ, Chloroquine; RAPA, rapamycin.

The short and long axes of the tumors were measured using calipers, and the mice were weighed once a week. Tumor volume was determined as (short-axis diameter)2×long-axis diameter×0.5. All mice were sacrificed on day 15 after administration. Tumors were then removed for histological evaluation.
Hematoxylin and eosin staining. Specimens were prepared and stained according to the standard hematoxylin-eosin protocol for histo-pathological evaluation (21).
Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay. Apoptosis was assessed using the One-step TUNEL In Situ Apoptosis Kit (Green, FITC) (E-CK-A320) (Elabscience, Houston, TX, USA). Fluorescence images were obtained using a IX71 microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Six views were randomly selected from two tumor sections per group. The cells were observed under the fluorescence microscope at 200× magnification. Positive cell counts were expressed as mean±standard error of the mean (SEM).
Statistical analysis. EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), was used to perform all statistical analyses (22). The parametric test for between-group comparisons was the Tukey-Kramer HSD. Nonparametric tests were conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test, and comparisons between groups were evaluated using the Steel-Dwass technique. Graphs show means±standard deviation (SD) or SEM. A p-value ≤0.05 was defined statistically significant.
Results
Treatment efficacy on DDLS-PDOX. The combination of CQ and RAPA arrested tumor growth in the DDLS PDOX compared to the untreated control (p=0.009) and was significantly more effective than RAPA alone (p=0.009). RAPA alone slowed tumor growth, but the difference was not statistically significant compared to the untreated control (p=0.2). CQ was not active alone (Figure 4). There was no significant difference in mouse body weight among the four groups (Figure 5).
Figure 4. Efficacy of drugs on the dedifferentiated liposarcoma patientderived orthotopic xenograft model. Line graphs show tumor volume at the indicated times relative to that at the start of treatment. *p<0.05. Error bars: ±SEM. CQ, Chloroquine; RAPA, rapamycin.

Figure 5. Effect of drugs on relative mouse body weight. Bar graphs show body weight of mice from each group at day 15 relative to day 1 of treatment. Error bars: ±SD. CQ, Chloroquine; RAPA, rapamycin.

Histology of DDLS-PDOX. PDOX tissue in the untreated control and CQ alone consisted of dysplastic cells (Figure 6A and B). Treatment with RAPA alone as well as with the combination of CQ and RAPA showed fibrotic tissue with reduced cancer cell density (Figure 6C and D).
Figure 6. Representative photomicrographs of H&E-stained dedifferentiated liposarcoma patient-derived orthotopic xenograft PDOX tissue sections. (A) Untreated control. (B) CQ-treated. (C) RAPA-treated. (D) Combination of CQ and RAPA. Magnification: 200×. Scale bar: 100 μm. CQ, Chloroquine; RAPA, rapamycin.
TUNEL assay of DDLS-PDOX. CQ combined with RAPA induced more apoptotic TUNEL-positive cells (24.33 cells) than the untreated control (3.33±1.60 cells); CQ alone (6.00±1.54 cells); and RAPA alone (7.00±1.93 cells) (p=0.02 for each comparison) (Figure 7 and Figure 8).
Figure 7. TUNEL assay of apoptosis in the dedifferentiated liposarcoma patient-derived orthotopic xenograft tissue sections. 4’,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (blue) indicates cell nuclei and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (green) indicates apoptotic cells. Magnification: 200×. Scale bar: 25 μm. CQ, Chloroquine; RAPA, rapamycin.
Figure 8. Apoptotic cell count by TUNEL assay. Cells were counted from 6 high-power microscopic fields from 2 TUNEL-stained tissue sections. *p<0.05. Error bars: ±SEM. CQ, Chloroquine; RAPA, rapamycin.

Discussion
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare mesenchymal malignant tumors that account for less than 1% of all adult malignancies. Liposarcoma is the most common histologic type of STS (23). In contrast to well-differentiated liposarcoma, which is less metastatic, the clinical behavior of DDLS is more aggressive, with a larger tendency for local recurrence and metastasis (2,23). The five-year survival rate of well-differentiated is approximately 90%, whereas that of DDLS is 28% (1,24). Because STS is a rare cancer with a small number of patients, the development of new drugs has lagged behind that for other, more frequent cancer types (25). Although pazopanib, eribulin, and trabectedin have been used to treat STS since 2010 (26-28), antitumor drugs such as doxorubicin and isophosphamide, developed in the 1970s and 1980s, are still the standard first-line treatment for STS (3-7).
Our previous studies have shown the efficacy of combining mTOR inhibitors with other antitumor agents against the PDOX mouse model of osteosarcoma (14,15). In the present study, a PDOX mouse model of DDPL was established and was used to evaluate the anticancer efficacy of the mTOR inhibitor RAPA and the antimalarial drug CQ. The results demonstrated that the combination of CQ and RAPA was highly effective against the PDOX model of DDLP.
The PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling system is activated in STS such as liposarcoma, Ewing’s sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma (29-32). mTOR inhibitors are thought to have anticancer efficacy by reducing the activity of the signaling pathway and arresting the cell cycle in G1 phase (33). In the present study, however, RAPA alone had no significant tumor-suppression effect.
CQ can induce apoptosis of cancer cells by inhibiting autophagy (17). Autophagy is an important physiological mechanism that controls the breakdown of proteins and organelles and maintains homeostasis (34). In cancer cells, autophagy promotes their proliferation by recycling accumulated metabolites and positively regulates cancer cell metabolism (35). CQ appears to accumulate in lysosomes and may inhibit proteolysis of proteins that are imported into the cell by endocytosis and induce apoptosis in cancer cells (17,35). For example, knockdown of LYSET, which is involved in targeting catabolic enzymes into lysosomes, greatly inhibits proteolysis in lysosomes, depriving the cancer cell of essential amino acids, including methionine, to which DDLS is addicted (36), and was shown to inhibit tumor growth (37).
In the present study, CQ alone did not significantly increase the number of apoptosis-positive cells and had no tumor suppressive effect. However, the combination of CQ and RAPA was found to significantly increase apoptosis-positive cells and enhance tumor suppression.
The efficacy of combining autophagy inhibitors with antineoplastic agents has been previously studied, and there are several reports that the combination can enhance apoptosis induction (18-20,38-44). However, there were no reports that the combination of CQ and RAPA induces apoptosis and enhances tumor suppression in vivo, especially in a PDOX mouse model of DDLS. The present study showed for the first time that the combination of CQ and RAPA is effective against DDLS in vivo. This indicates CQ plus RAPA may be a potent clinical treatment for DDLS.
Conclusion
Combination therapy with CQ and RAPA, both FDA approved drugs, arrested a DDLS PDOX and demonstrated clinical potential for DDLS, a recalcitrant cancer. The present results suggest that treatment of DDLS patients with the combination of CQ and RAPA may be effective.
Conflicts of Interest
The Authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in relation to this study. AntiCancer Inc. uses PDOX models for contract research.
Authors’ Contributions
N.M. conceived the study, N.M., Y.A. Y. K. and K.O. performed the experiments and J.M. and R.M.H. provided scientific advice. N.M. wrote the paper and R.M.H. revised the paper.
Acknowledgements
This paper is dedicated to the memory of A.R. Moossa, MD, Sun Lee, MD, Professor Li Jiaxi, Masaki Kitajima, MD, Shigeo Yagi, PhD and Jack Geller, MD. The present study was supported by the Robert M. Hoffman Foundation for Cancer Research.
References
- 1.Singer S, Antonescu CR, Riedel E, Brennan MF. Histologic subtype and margin of resection predict pattern of recurrence and survival for retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Ann Surg. 2003;238(3):358–70. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000086542.11899.38. discussion 370-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Masaki N, Onozawa M, Inoue T, Kurobe M, Kawai K, Miyazaki J. Clinical features of multiply recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma: A single-center experience. Asian J Surg. 2021;44(1):380–385. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Elias A, Ryan L, Aisner J, Antman KH. Mesna, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, dacarbazine (MAID) regimen for adults with advanced sarcoma. Semin Oncol. 1990;17(2 Suppl 4):41–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Santoro A, Tursz T, Mouridsen H, Verweij J, Steward W, Somers R, Buesa J, Casali P, Spooner D, Rankin E. Doxorubicin versus CYVADIC versus doxorubicin plus ifosfamide in first-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13(7):1537–1545. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.7.1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Judson I, Verweij J, Gelderblom H, Hartmann JT, Schöffski P, Blay JY, Kerst JM, Sufliarsky J, Whelan J, Hohenberger P, Krarup-Hansen A, Alcindor T, Marreaud S, Litière S, Hermans C, Fisher C, Hogendoorn PC, dei Tos AP, van der Graaf WT, European Organisation and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Doxorubicin alone versus intensified doxorubicin plus ifosfamide for first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(4):415–423. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70063-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yap BS, Baker LH, Sinkovics JG, Rivkin SE, Bottomley R, Thigpen T, Burgess MA, Benjamin RS, Bodey GP. Cyclophosphamide, vincristine, adriamycin, and DTIC (CYVADIC) combination chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced sarcomas. Cancer Treat Rep. 1980;64(1):93–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schütte J, Mouridsen HT, Stewart W, Santoro A, van Oosterom AT, Somers R, Blackledge G, Verweij J, Dombernowsky P, Thomas D. Ifosfamide plus doxorubicin in previously untreated patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma. The EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Eur J Cancer. 1990;26(5):558–561. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(90)90075-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fu XY, Besterman JM, Monosov A, Hoffman RM. Models of human metastatic colon cancer in nude mice orthotopically constructed by using histologically intact patient specimens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 1991;88(20):9345–9349. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.20.9345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hoffman RM. Patient-derived orthotopic xenografts: better mimic of metastasis than subcutaneous xenografts. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(8):451–452. doi: 10.1038/nrc3972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Furukawa T, Kubota T, Watanabe M, Kitajima M, Hoffman RM. Orthotopic transplantation of histologically intact clinical specimens of stomach cancer to nude mice: correlation of metastatic sites in mouse and individual patient donors. Int J Cancer. 1993;53(4):608–612. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910530414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Saunders RN, Metcalfe MS, Nicholson ML. Rapamycin in transplantation: a review of the evidence. Kidney Int. 2001;59(1):3–16. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00460.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Oudard S, Hutson TE, Porta C, Bracarda S, Grünwald V, Thompson JA, Figlin RA, Hollaender N, Urbanowitz G, Berg WJ, Kay A, Lebwohl D, Ravaud A, RECORD-1 Study Group Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9637):449–456. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61039-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hay N, Sonenberg N. Upstream and downstream of mTOR. Genes Dev. 2004;18(16):1926–1945. doi: 10.1101/gad.1212704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Oshiro H, Tome Y, Miyake K, Higuchi T, Sugisawa N, Kanaya F, Nishida K, Hoffman RM. Combination of CDK4/6 and mTOR inhibitors suppressed doxorubicin-resistant osteosarcoma in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft mouse model: a translatable strategy for recalcitrant disease. Anticancer Res. 2021;41(7):3287–3292. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Oshiro H, Tome Y, Miyake K, Higuchi T, Sugisawa N, Kanaya F, Nishida K, Hoffman RM. An mTOR and VEGFR inhibitor combination arrests a doxorubicin resistant lung metastatic osteosarcoma in a PDOX mouse model. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):8583. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87553-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Solomon VR, Lee H. Chloroquine and its analogs: a new promise of an old drug for effective and safe cancer therapies. Eur J Pharmacol. 2009;625(1-3):220–233. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.06.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pascolo S. Time to use a dose of Chloroquine as an adjuvant to anti-cancer chemotherapies. Eur J Pharmacol. 2016;771:139–144. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Erkisa M, Aydinlik S, Cevatemre B, Aztopal N, Akar RO, Celikler S, Yilmaz VT, Ari F, Ulukaya E. A promising therapeutic combination for metastatic prostate cancer: Chloroquine as autophagy inhibitor and palladium(II) barbiturate complex. Biochimie. 2020;175:159–172. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2020.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Guo XL, Li D, Hu F, Song JR, Zhang SS, Deng WJ, Sun K, Zhao QD, Xie XQ, Song YJ, Wu MC, Wei LX. Targeting autophagy potentiates chemotherapy-induced apoptosis and proliferation inhibition in hepatocarcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2012;320(2):171–179. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rangwala R, Chang YC, Hu J, Algazy KM, Evans TL, Fecher LA, Schuchter LM, Torigian DA, Panosian JT, Troxel AB, Tan KS, Heitjan DF, DeMichele AM, Vaughn DJ, Redlinger M, Alavi A, Kaiser J, Pontiggia L, Davis LE, O’Dwyer PJ, Amaravadi RK. Combined MTOR and autophagy inhibition: phase I trial of hydroxychloroquine and temsirolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors and melanoma. Autophagy. 2014;10(8):1391–1402. doi: 10.4161/auto.29119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cardiff RD, Miller CH, Munn RJ. Manual hematoxylin and eosin staining of mouse tissue sections. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2014;2014(6):655–658. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot073411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48(3):452–458. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gamboa AC, Gronchi A, Cardona K. Soft-tissue sarcoma in adults: An update on the current state of histiotype-specific management in an era of personalized medicine. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(3):200–229. doi: 10.3322/caac.21605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Henricks WH, Chu YC, Goldblum JR, Weiss SW. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma: a clinicopathological analysis of 155 cases with a proposal for an expanded definition of dedifferentiation. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997;21(3):271–281. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199703000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yuan J, Li X, Yu S. Molecular targeted therapy for advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer Control. 2021;28:10732748211038424. doi: 10.1177/10732748211038424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.van der Graaf WT, Blay JY, Chawla SP, Kim DW, Bui-Nguyen B, Casali PG, Schöffski P, Aglietta M, Staddon AP, Beppu Y, Le Cesne A, Gelderblom H, Judson IR, Araki N, Ouali M, Marreaud S, Hodge R, Dewji MR, Coens C, Demetri GD, Fletcher CD, Dei Tos AP, Hohenberger P, EORTC Soft Tissue , Bone Sarcoma Group and PALETTE study group Pazopanib for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (PALETTE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9829):1879–1886. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60651-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schöffski P, Chawla S, Maki RG, Italiano A, Gelderblom H, Choy E, Grignani G, Camargo V, Bauer S, Rha SY, Blay JY, Hohenberger P, D’Adamo D, Guo M, Chmielowski B, Le Cesne A, Demetri GD, Patel SR. Eribulin versus dacarbazine in previously treated patients with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma: a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10028):1629–1637. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01283-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Barone A, Chi DC, Theoret MR, Chen H, He K, Kufrin D, Helms WS, Subramaniam S, Zhao H, Patel A, Goldberg KB, Keegan P, Pazdur R. FDA approval summary: Trabectedin for unresectable or metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma following an anthracycline-containing regimen. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(24):7448–7453. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Passacantilli I, Frisone P, De Paola E, Fidaleo M, Paronetto MP. hnRNPM guides an alternative splicing program in response to inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in Ewing sarcoma cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(21):12270–12284. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Laroche A, Chaire V, Algeo MP, Karanian M, Fourneaux B, Italiano A. MDM2 antagonists synergize with PI3K/mTOR inhibition in well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcomas. Oncotarget. 2017;8(33):53968–53977. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Guenther MK, Graab U, Fulda S. Synthetic lethal interaction between PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Ras/MEK/ERK pathway inhibition in rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer Lett. 2013;337(2):200–209. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hernando E, Charytonowicz E, Dudas ME, Menendez S, Matushansky I, Mills J, Socci ND, Behrendt N, Ma L, Maki RG, Pandolfi PP, Cordon-Cardo C. The AKT-mTOR pathway plays a critical role in the development of leiomyosarcomas. Nat Med. 2007;13(6):748–753. doi: 10.1038/nm1560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gomez-Pinillos A, Ferrari AC. mTOR signaling pathway and mTOR inhibitors in cancer therapy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2012;26(3):483–505, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2012.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Klionsky DJ, Emr SD. Autophagy as a regulated pathway of cellular degradation. Science. 2000;290(5497):1717–1721. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5497.1717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.White E. Deconvoluting the context-dependent role for autophagy in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(6):401–410. doi: 10.1038/nrc3262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Higuchi T, Han Q, Miyake K, Oshiro H, Sugisawa N, Tan Y, Yamamoto N, Hayashi K, Kimura H, Miwa S, Igarashi K, Bouvet M, Singh SR, Tsuchiya H, Hoffman RM. Combination of oral recombinant methioninase and decitabine arrests a chemotherapy-resistant undifferentiated soft-tissue sarcoma patient-derived orthotopic xenograft mouse model. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;523(1):135–139. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pechincha C, Groessl S, Kalis R, de Almeida M, Zanotti A, Wittmann M, Schneider M, de Campos RP, Rieser S, Brandstetter M, Schleiffer A, Müller-Decker K, Helm D, Jabs S, Haselbach D, Lemberg MK, Zuber J, Palm W. Lysosomal enzyme trafficking factor LYSET enables nutritional usage of extracellular proteins. Science. 2022:eabn5637. doi: 10.1126/science.abn5637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ishibashi Y, Nakamura O, Yamagami Y, Nishimura H, Fukuoka N, Yamamoto T. Chloroquine enhances rapamycin-induced apoptosis in MG63 cells. Anticancer Res. 2019;39(2):649–654. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shiratori H, Kawai K, Hata K, Tanaka T, Nishikawa T, Otani K, Sasaki K, Kaneko M, Murono K, Emoto S, Sonoda H, Nozawa H. The combination of temsirolimus and chloroquine increases radiosensitivity in colorectal cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2019;42(1):377–385. doi: 10.3892/or.2019.7134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Amaravadi RK, Yu D, Lum JJ, Bui T, Christophorou MA, Evan GI, Thomas-Tikhonenko A, Thompson CB. Autophagy inhibition enhances therapy-induced apoptosis in a Myc-induced model of lymphoma. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(2):326–336. doi: 10.1172/JCI28833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bellodi C, Lidonnici MR, Hamilton A, Helgason GV, Soliera AR, Ronchetti M, Galavotti S, Young KW, Selmi T, Yacobi R, Van Etten RA, Donato N, Hunter A, Dinsdale D, Tirrò E, Vigneri P, Nicotera P, Dyer MJ, Holyoake T, Salomoni P, Calabretta B. Targeting autophagy potentiates tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced cell death in Philadelphia chromosome-positive cells, including primary CML stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(5):1109–1123. doi: 10.1172/JCI35660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shimizu S, Takehara T, Hikita H, Kodama T, Tsunematsu H, Miyagi T, Hosui A, Ishida H, Tatsumi T, Kanto T, Hiramatsu N, Fujita N, Yoshimori T, Hayashi N. Inhibition of autophagy potentiates the antitumor effect of the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2012;131(3):548–557. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wang FT, Wang H, Wang QW, Pan MS, Li XP, Sun W, Fan YZ. Inhibition of autophagy by chloroquine enhances the antitumor activity of gemcitabine for gallbladder cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020;86(2):221–232. doi: 10.1007/s00280-020-04100-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bryant KL, Stalnecker CA, Zeitouni D, Klomp JE, Peng S, Tikunov AP, Gunda V, Pierobon M, Waters AM, George SD, Tomar G, Papke B, Hobbs GA, Yan L, Hayes TK, Diehl JN, Goode GD, Chaika NV, Wang Y, Zhang GF, Witkiewicz AK, Knudsen ES, Petricoin EF 3rd, Singh PK, Macdonald JM, Tran NL, Lyssiotis CA, Ying H, Kimmelman AC, Cox AD, Der CJ. Combination of ERK and autophagy inhibition as a treatment approach for pancreatic cancer. Nat Med. 2019;25(4):628–640. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0368-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



