Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 21.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 Nov 30;68(5):e28825. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28825

Previously Unreported Somatic Variants in Two Patients with Pleuropulmonary Blastoma with Metastatic Brain Recurrence

Michael J Ferguson 1, Jennifer Ivanovich 2, Paige Stansell 1, Terry A Vik 1, Amy E Helvie 3, Morgan R Schmitt 1, Kris Ann Schultz 4, Louis P Dehner 4,5, Jamie L Renbarger 1, Mark A Marshall 1
PMCID: PMC9677809  NIHMSID: NIHMS1850185  PMID: 33258270

To the editor:

Pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB) is the most common primary lung tumor of childhood with 96% of tumors diagnosed prior to seven years of age and are associated with pathogenic somatic or germline DICER1 variants in most cases [1,2]. First described as an entity in 1988, its initial feature is a multi-locular cyst whose septa are composed of primitive mesenchymal cells which either progress to a primitive multi-patterned sarcoma with overgrowth of these cysts into a high grade neoplasm with anaplasia or undergoes regression [3]. DICER1 germline pathogenic variants were discovered to harbor an increased risk for development of a variety of neoplasms, with PPB highlighted as the archetype [46]. Brain metastases, especially in recurrence, are difficult to treat and the survival rate in children remains low [7,8], emphasizing the need to understand additional genomic drivers to develop novel treatments. Here we present two cases that document additional distinct, uncharacterized molecular findings in recurrent type III PPBs with brain metastases.

The first patient presented at 2 years of age with a persistent cough. Subsequent computerized topography (CT) scan revealed a 10 × 9.8 × 8.1cm heterogeneous, hypodense mass occupying the left hemithorax. Biopsy revealed a high grade sarcoma with rhabdomyoblastic features and anaplasia characteristic of type III PPB (see Figure 1). There was no family history of cancer or thyroid problems. Staging brain CT and bone scan were negative for metastatic disease. The patient received 12 cycles of ifosfamide, vincristine, actinomycin-D and doxorubicin (IVADo), underwent a left lower lobe resection at week 12, and received intra-cavitary cisplatin for local control. At 36 months post-treatment a 3cm mass arising from the left ventricle was discovered by echocardiogram. The mass was resected and found to be recurrent PPB. He underwent re-induction chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue. Subsequently, he developed brain metastases two years later, prompting a Pediatric Precision Genomics consultation for tumor molecular analysis. He received irinotecan and pazopanib based on FGFR1 gene amplification and overexpression of TOPO1 protein. Additional genomic analysis was performed on another brain metastasis which demonstrated an ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. He participated in a larotrectinib trial for 4 cycles before progression of disease and subsequent death.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Histologic images of initial diagnostic tumor samples. A. 20x view of the first patient tumor which shows scattered large bizarre-appearing anaplastic tumor cells are surrounded by smaller primitive malignant cells. This pattern is a common one in DICER1-associated neoplasms. B. 20x view of the second patient tumor nodule displaying neoplastic cartilage surrounded by a field of primitive tumor cells with a subpopulation of rhabdomyoblasts. This pattern characterizes both pulmonary and extrapulmonary DICER1 neoplasms.

The second patient presented at 3 years of age with a persistent cough and was found to have a solid heterogeneous mass in the left chest measuring 10 × 8.4 × 10.5cm on CT. Of note when reviewing family history, mother revealed that she had a thyroid goiter and an abdominal desmoid tumor that had been removed. Biopsy revealed a sarcoma with primitive multi-pattern of PPB type III (see Figure 1). Brain MRI and bone scan showed no metastatic disease, but an echocardiogram demonstrated a mass attached to the left atrium concerning for local extension. This patient subsequently underwent resection of both the atrial and intrathoracic masses, completed IVADo chemotherapy, and received intra-cavitary cisplatin for local control due to tumor spill. Two months later, multiple brain metastases were discovered and subsequently underwent gamma knife radiotherapy. Two cycles of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide followed and this patient then proceeded with metronomic chemotherapy consisting of thalidomide, celecoxib, fenofibrate, oral cyclophosphamide alternating with oral etoposide, and every two week bevacizumab, per Nakano et al, which she continues on without recurrence [7].

All cancer relevant genomic findings for both cases are summarized in Table 1 which include the previously unreported changes in PPB of an ETV6-NTRK3 fusion and a PIK3CA mutation. In the first patient, tumor whole genome sequencing (WGS) paired with tumor RNAseq and germline sequencing was performed for the first sample by NantHealth. At recurrence whole exome sequencing (WES) again paired with RNAseq and germline analysis was performed by NantHealth. For the second patient, germline analysis was performed shortly after diagnosis at Ambry Genetics Laboratory which identified a pathogenic DICER1 variant, p.R676*. The tumor sample from the second patient’s lung at initial diagnosis was sequenced using the FoundationOne Heme panel.

Table 1.

Germline and Tumor Sequencing Results from Recurrent PPB Patients

Case No. Tumor Sample Sequencing Company Pathogenic Somatic Mutations/Fusions Pathogenic Germline Variants Tumor Copy Number Variation Tumor Mutation Burden Tumor VUS of known oncogenic drivers
1# Brain Recurrence NantHealth TP53 p. R273H
ETV6-NRTK3&
DICER1 WT FGFR1 (7x) 2.7 mut/MB KMT2C p.R2211T
TCEB3 p.A22E
2nd Brain Recurrence NantHealth TP53 p. R273H
ETV6-NRTK3
DICER1 WT FGFR1 (7x) 2.7 mut/MB KMT2C p.R2211T
KCNT2 p.Y331CfsTer37
2 Primary FoundationOne Heme Panel; Ambry Genetics Laboratory+ PIK3CA p.Q546P
PPP2R1A p.R183W
NOTCH2 Truncation Exon 24
DICER1 p.R676Ter MDM2 amp (30x) C17orf39 (10x) FRS2 (93x) 4 mut/MB ATM p.I1688V
EPHB1 p.R84H
HDAC1 p.M295T
#

No pathogenic DICER1 variants were found either tumor sample despite analysis of new tumor and germline samples 12 months after the initial sample sequencing.

&

The ETV6-NRTK3 gene fusion in the initial sequencing was later identified upon reanalysis of the sequencing data.

+

Germline analysis was performed at Ambry Genetics Laboratory as FoundationOne testing does not offer germline analysis

Definitions: VUS = Variant of Unknown Significance. A variant of unknown significance is an allele, or variant form of a gene, whose significance to the normal function of the encoded protein and any corresponding phenotype, is unknown. WT = Wild Type. Ter = termination codon.

For the first patient, the lack of either a DICER1 somatic or germline variant is unique despite pathologic findings characteristic of PPB though low-level mosaicism may provide an explanation for a DICER1-negative PPB [9]. Identification of the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion led us to question if this tumor may represent an infantile fibrosarcoma but brain metastases are an extremely unusual manifestation [10]. Additionally, the tumor continued to progress despite known high response rates of NTRK-fused infantile fibrosarcomas to larotrectinib [11,12]. A TP53 pathogenic variant, p.R273H, was identified in this case which have been observed in PPB and could have modulated response to larotrectinib [13]. Recent evidence from Gatalica et al. showed TP53 is the most commonly co-mutated gene in NTRK-fused neoplasms and another report showed an impressive response to larotrectinib in a refractory high-grade glioma despite tumoral TP53 loss [14,15]. Additionally, the AGO2 p.H443R variant could have promoted resistance given AGO2 is required for the efficient functioning of DICER1 though this particular mutational change in AGO2 has not been interrogated making its tumor impact unclear [16].

The sequencing results for the second patient are unique due to the identification of a PIK3CA mutation and MDM2 amplification in addition to a DICER1 germline variant identified around initial diagnosis. In the largest published study, exome sequencing was performed on 15 PPBs with no PIK3CA mutations or MDM2 amplification identified [13]. MDM2 is a negative regulator of TP53 [17,18] and its amplification promotes therapeutic resistance in a variety of cancers, including sarcomas leading to poor prognosis [1922]. PIK3CA mutations have been reported as oncogenic drivers in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, which is associated with germline DICER1 variants. [2326]. Similar to MDM2, PIK3CA mutations are reported to promote therapeutic resistance in breast cancer, germ cell tumors, and sarcoma [2730]. Early phase trials are currently underway in recurrent pediatric cancers utilizing both MDM2 and PIK3CA inhibitors.

To date, comprehensive molecular analyses of PPBs are limited. Due to the histologic complexity and heterogeneity of these tumors, both cases highlight the importance of sequencing tumors to identify additional oncogenic drivers that promote early and novel therapeutic interventions for PPB recurrence.

Acknowledgements

The Precision Genomics Team at Indiana University School of Medicine is supported by U54HD16014 (Renbarger) - Indiana University Center for Pediatric Pharmacology and Precision Medicine (ICPPPM).

The authors would like to acknowledge D. Ashley Hill, MD of Children’s National Hospital and the International PPB Registry for reviewing the accuracy of these cases and manuscript.

The authors would like to additionally acknowledge Eric Albright, MD for reviewing the manuscript supplying histologic images for Figure 1.

Abbreviations:

PPB

Pleuropulmonary Blastoma

FGFR1

Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1

CT

Computed Tomography

TOPO1

Topoisomerase I

ETV6

ETS Variant Transcription Factor 6

NTRK

Neurotrophic Tyrosine Receptor Kinase

MRI

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

AGO2

Argonaute RISC Catalytic Component 2

MDM2

Mouse double minute 2 homolog

PIK3CA

Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-Bisphosphate 3-Kinase Catalytic Subunit Alpha

PPP2R1

Protein Phosphatase 2, scaffold subunit A, alpha

VUS

Variant of Unknown Significance

WES

Whole Exome Sequencing

WGS

Whole Genome Sequencing

WT

Wild Type

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest

The authors of this manuscript have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • 1.Manivel JC et al. Pleuropulmonary Blastoma. The so-called pulmonary blastoma of childhood. Cancer. 1988. 62:1516–1526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Messinger Y et al. Pleuropulmonary blastoma: a report on 350 central pathology-confirmed pleuropulmonary blastoma cases by the International Pleuropulmonary Blastoma Registry. 2015. Cancer. 2015. 121(2):276–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dehner LP et al. Pleuropulmonary blastoma: evolution of an entity as an entry into a familial tumor predisposition syndrome. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2015. 18(6):504–511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hill DA et al. DICER1 mutations in familial pleuropulmonary blastoma. Science. 2009. 325:965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schultz KA et al. DICER1 and associated conditions: Identification of at-risk individuals and recommended surveillance strategies. Clinical Cancer Research 2018. 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stewart DR et al. Neoplasm risk among individuals with a pathogenic germline variant in DICER1. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 10;37(8)668–676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nakano Y, et al. Successful treatment of metastatic cerebral recurrence of pleuropulmonary blastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019. May;66(5):e27628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Priest JR, et al. Cerebral metastasis and other central nervous system complications of pleuropulmonary blastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007. Sep;49(3):266–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brenneman M, et al. Temporal order of RNase IIIb and loss-of-function mutations during development determines phenotypes in pleuropulmonary blastoma/DICER1 syndrome: a unique variant of the two-hit tumor suppression model. F1000Res. 2015. Jul 10:4:214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Parida L, et al. Clinical management of infantile fibrosarcoma: a retrospective single-institution review. Pediatr Surg Int. 2013. Jul;29(7):703–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Drilon A, et al. Efficacy of Larotrectinib in TRK Fusion-Positive Cancers in Adults and Children. N Engl J Med. 2018. Feb 22;378(8):731–739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Laetsch TW, et al. Larotrectinib for paediatric solid tumours harbouring NTRK gene fusions: phase 1 results from a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018. May;19(5):705–714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pugh TJ et al. Exome sequencing of pleuropulmonary blastoma reveals frequent biallelic loss of TP53 and two hits in DICER1 resulting in retention of 5p-derived miRNA hairpin loop sequences. Oncogene. 2014. 33:5295–5302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gatalica Z, et al. Molecular characterization of cancers with NTRK gene fusions. Mod Pathol. 2019. Jan;32(1):147–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ziegler DS, et al. Brief Report: Potent clinical and radiological response to larotrectinib in TRK fusion-driven high-grade glioma. Br J Cancer. 2018. Sep 11; 119(6): 693–696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Koscianska E, et al. The role of Dicer protein partners in the processing of microRNA precursors. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Momand J, et al. The mdm-2 oncogene product forms a complex with the p53 protein and inhibits p53-mediated transactivation. Cell. 1992. Jun 26;69(7):1237–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hou H, et al. The role of MDM2 amplification and overexpression in therapeutic resistance of malignant tumors. Cancer Cell Int. 2019. Aug 22;19:216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kato S, et al. Analysis of MDM2 Amplification: Next-Generation Sequencing of Patients With Diverse Malignancies. JCO Precis Oncol. 2018;2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dembla V, et al. Prevalence of MDM2 amplification and coalterations in 523 advanced cancer patients in the MD Anderson phase 1 clinic. Oncotarget. 2018. Sep 4;9(69):33232–33243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sawada R, et al. MDM2 copy number increase: a poor prognostic, molecular event in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2019. Jul;89:1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bill KLJ, et al. Degree of MDM2 Amplification Affects Clinical Outcomes in Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma. Oncologist. 2019. Jul;24(7):989–996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shukla N, et al. Oncogene mutation profiling of pediatric solid tumors reveals significant subsets of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma and neuroblastoma with mutated genes in growth signaling pathways. Clin Cancer Res. 2012. Feb 1;18(3):748–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kikuchi K, et al. MDM2 Amplification and PI3KCA Mutation in a Case of Sclerosing Rhabdomyosarcoma. Sarcoma. 2013;2013:520858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Agaram NP, et al. MYOD1-mutant spindle cell and sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma: an aggressive subtype irrespective of age. A reappraisal for molecular classification and risk stratification. Mod Pathol. 2019. Jan;32(1):27–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Doros L, et al. DICER1 mutations in embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas from children with and without familial PPB-tumor predisposition syndrome. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012. Sep;59(3):558–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lobil S, et al. PIK3CA mutations are associated with reduced pathological complete response rates in primary HER2-positive breast cancer: pooled analysis of 967 patients from five prospective trials investigating lapatinib and trastuzumab. Ann Oncol. 2016. Aug;27(8):1519–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rimawi MF, et al. Low PTEN levels and PIK3CA mutations predict resistance to neoadjuvant lapatinib and trastuzumab without chemotherapy in patients with HER2 over-expressing breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018. Feb;167(3):731–740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Feldman DR, et al. Presence of somatic mutations within PIK3CA, AKT, RAS, and FGFR3 but not BRAF in cisplatin-resistant germ cell tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2014. Jul 15;20(14):3712–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jiang Y, et al. Novel secondary somatic mutations in Ewing’s sarcoma and desmoplastic small round cell tumors. PLoS One. 2014. Aug 13;9(8):e93676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES