Skip to main content
Radiology Case Reports logoLink to Radiology Case Reports
. 2022 Nov 18;18(1):392–396. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.10.091

A rare, giant, lateral intraventricular gliosarcoma

Ho Xuan Tuan a,1, Nguyen Minh Duc b,1,⁎
PMCID: PMC9678708  PMID: 36425394

Abstract

A peculiar subtype of glioblastoma multiforme is gliosarcoma. According to histological analysis, it possesses a biphasic shape that clearly distinguishes between glial and sarcomatous tissue. A gliosarcoma is often seen in the supratentorial region. Here, we describe a rare instance of giant left intraventricular gliosarcoma that manifested in a 1-year-old male. Advanced brain scan using magnetic resonance imaging identified a supratentorial tumor with radiological characteristics comparable to choroid plexus carcinoma. Histopathology determined that the tumor was a gliosarcoma. Despite its rarity, gliosarcoma should be taken into consideration when determining the differential diagnosis of intraventricular tumors in children who exhibit radiological signs of choroid plexus carcinoma.

Keywords: Gliosarcoma, Intraventricular tumor, Magnetic resonance imaging

Introduction

The current (2021) World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system tumors still recognizes gliosarcoma as a classic variety of glioblastoma along with epithelioid and giant cell glioblastomas, despite the fact that they are not different diagnoses. They are primary intra-axial neoplasms that are extremely malignant (WHO grade 4), and they contain both glial and mesenchymal components [1]. It is noted that 2%-8% of all initial glioblastomas are gliosarcomas, a rare and uncommon kind of aggressive malignancy [2]. It is essentially a subtype of glioblastoma with glial and sarcomatous components that have differentiated separately and divergently from one another. This phenomenon was first described by Stroebe et al in 1895 [3] and later, in 1955, Feigen et al. provided a detailed description of it [4]. It is mostly found in the frontal and temporal lobes of the cerebral hemispheres. In rare cases, it can also be detected intraventricularly [2,5]. Clinically and radiologically, glioblastoma and gliosarcoma are related. It demonstrates a preference for men between the ages of 40 and 60. If the patient is not treated, it results in a poor clinical prognosis with an average survival of fewer than 6 months [2], [3], [4], [5]. To the best of our knowledge, this article describes the exceptionally unusual case of giant lateral intraventricular gliosarcoma.

Case presentation

A 1-year-old male, suffering from 1-month headache, nausea, and vomiting, was admitted to department of neurosurgery, Children's Hospital 2. Her medical profile manifested no abnormalities. Neurological deficits were not detected during clinical evaluation. The routine laboratory tests and tumor markers were within normal ranges. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast agent was immediately indicated for her. A heterogeneous mass with solid and predominantly cyst components inside the structure (139 mm × 60 mm × 110 mm), was noticed in the left lateral ventricle with surrounding vasogenic edema, on T2-weighted image (Fig. 1). The tumor triggered midline shift and mass effect. There was no hemorrhage or calcification observed inside the lesion. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient values for the solid component of mass was 0.95 × 10−3 mm2/s (Fig. 2). The cerebral blood flow value of solid component of mass and normal parenchyma was 45.3 and 20.3, respectively (Fig. 3). On magnetic resonance imaging spectroscopy, the choline/N-acetyl aspartate ratio of the solid part of mass was 2.17 (Fig. 4). The relative enhancement (%), peak enhancement, peak relative enhancement (%), time to peak (s), wash-in rate (s−1), wash-out rate (s−1), and area under the curve values of the solid mass component and the parenchyma, as measured from the axial T1-perfusion map, were 107.66 vs 2.95, 1724.78 vs 55.46, 115.10 vs 4.45, 138.58 vs 56.69, 137.14 vs 16.39, 4.17 vs 12.87, and 226,365 vs 165, respectively (Fig. 5). The first diagnosis, relied on the clinical and subclinical information, was a choroid plexus carcinoma. The patient adopted gross-total tumor resection. The histopathological evaluation of the excised tumor tissues displayed a gliosarcoma. Two weeks later, the patient was released and prompted to adopt adjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy at a distinct oncological center. This patient passed away 9 months later.

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

Axial T2-weighted image shows a predominantly cystic mass located inside the left lateral ventricle.

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

Axial apparent diffusion coefficient map of the lesion and normal-appearing parenchyma.

Fig. 3.

Fig 3

Arterial spin-labeling image of the lesion and normal-appearing parenchyma.

Fig. 4.

Fig 4

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the lesion.

Fig. 5.

Fig 5

Axial T1-perfusion map of the lesion and normal-appearing parenchyma.

Discussion

Gliosarcoma was once thought to be the result of the collision of 2 distinct malignant neoplasms, one of which exhibited glial differentiation and the other a sarcomatous differentiation. Both of these neoplasms were thought to have developed from the proliferation of vascular cells. The present understanding of monoclonality has arisen as a result of recent advances in research, since it has been demonstrated that both components share the same genetic arrangement [1,5,6]. Primary gliosarcoma has been classified as a subtype of glioblastoma and given a highest grade in the 2021 WHO classification of central nervous system malignancies [1].

Although it can also affect the frontal, parietal, and occipital lobes, gliosarcoma is a unique morphological subtype of glioblastoma with a small male preponderance, age spanning from the sixth to seventh decades, and a predisposition for the temporal lobes [2,6,[7], [8], [9]]. Thus, gliosarcoma was very uncommon in children and outstandingly rare inside the ventricle. According to several studies, glioblastoma and gliosarcoma are difficult to identify clinically since they both occur at comparable ages, have brief clinical histories, and have short post-diagnosis survival times [1,8,10,11]. The pathophysiology of gliosarcoma is a subject of great debate. Some writers hypothesized that the hyperplastic blood arteries that are frequently present in high grade gliomas underwent neoplastic change to become the sarcomatous components [4,12]. Early descriptions of hyperplastic arteries and perivascular arrangement of sarcomatous components in gliosarcoma by Feigin et al. provided support for this "collision tumor" idea [4,6,10]. A competing view, which has lately gained support, proposes that both gliosarcoma components have monoclonal origins, with the sarcomatous component deriving from abnormal mesenchymal differentiation of the malignant glioma [5,[11], [12], [13]]. The glial and mesenchymal components might be distinguished thanks to reticulin and Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). The glial component is reticulin-poor and GFAP-positive, in contrast to the sarcomatous regions, which are reticulin-rich and GFAP-negative [6]. The course of treatment is the same as for glioblastomas and includes surgical resection, depending on the patient's clinical condition, more chemotherapy or radiation may be necessary [6,7].

Conclusion

Giant lateral intraventricular gliosarcoma in a child is extremely rare. It is a histologically biphasic tumor with distinct glial and sarcomatous components. It is linked to a very aggressive clinical course, fast patient deterioration, and unfavorable results. Even while receiving radiotherapy and chemotherapy in combination, the patients' mean survival rate still falls less than 12 months.

Author contributions

HXT and NMD contributed equally to this article as first authorship. Each author performed all steps to complete this article.

Funding

The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Informed consent

Informed consent has been obtained from the family members of the patient included in this study.

Ethics approval

This study has been approved by the hospital ethics committee (Ref: 352/NĐ2-CĐT).

Data sharing statement

Not applicable

Patient consent

Informed consent for patient information to be published in this article was obtained.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Children's Hospital 2 owing to their general support and technical help.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have each completed and submitted an International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Uniform Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest to disclose in relation to the present article.

References

  • 1.Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat DJ, Cree IA, Figarella-Branger D, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23(8):1231–1251. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Doddamani RS, Meena RK, Selvam MM, Venkataramanaa NK, Tophkhane M, Garg SK. Intraventricular Gliosarcomas: literature review and a case description. World Neurosurg. 2016;90:707. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.03.033. e5–707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stroebe H. Ueber entstehung und bauder gehirnglioma. Beitr Pathol Anat. 1895;19:405–486. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Feigin IM, Gross SW. Sarcoma arising in glioblastoma of the brain. Am J Pathol. 1955;31(4):633–665. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Reis RM, Konu-Lebleblicioglu D, Lopes JM, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H. Genetic profile of gliosarcomas. Am J Pathol. 2000;156(2):425–432. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64746-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Huo Z, Yang D, Shen J, Li Y, Wu H, Meng Y, et al. Primary gliosarcoma with long-survival: report of two cases and review of literature. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7(9):6323–6332. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Han SJ, Yang I, Tihan T, Prados MD, Parsa AT. Primary gliosarcoma: key clinical and pathologic distinctions from glioblastoma with implications as a unique oncologic entity. J Neurooncol. 2010;96(3):313–320. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-9973-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Morantz RA, Feigin I, Ransohoff J. Clinical and pathological study of 24 cases of gliosarcoma. J Neurosurg. 1976;45(4):398–408. doi: 10.3171/jns.1976.45.4.0398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lutterbach J, Guttenberger R, Pagenstecher A. Gliosarcoma: a clinical study. Radiother Oncol. 2001;61:57–64. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00415-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pardo J, Murcia M, García F, Alvarado A. Gliosarcoma: a rare primary CNS tumor. Presentation of two cases. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2010;15(4):98–102. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2010.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Feigini I, Allen LB, Lipkin L, Gross SW. The endothelial hyperplasia of the cerebral blood vessels with brain tumors, and its sarcomatous transformation. Cancer. 1958;11(2):264–277. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(195803/04)11:2<264::aid-cncr2820110207>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Perry JR, Ang LC, Bilbao JM, Muller PJ. Clinicopathologic features of primary and postradiation cerebral gliosarcoma. Cancer. 1995;75(12):2910–2918. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950615)75:12<2910::aid-cncr2820751219>3.0.co;2-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Minh Thong P, Minh Duc N. The role of apparent diffusion coefficient in the differentiation between cerebellar medulloblastoma and brainstem glioma. Neurol Int. 2020;12(3):34–40. doi: 10.3390/neurolint12030009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Radiology Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES