Skip to main content
Fish and Shellfish Immunology Reports logoLink to Fish and Shellfish Immunology Reports
. 2022 Jan 24;3:100052. doi: 10.1016/j.fsirep.2022.100052

SpgC1qR interacts with WSSV VP28 exhibiting antiviral activity

Yue Wang a,1, Bin Zhang a,b,1, Shu Zhao a, Yuan Wang a, Xu Chu a, Xin-Cang Li a,⁎
PMCID: PMC9680082  PMID: 36419614

Highlights

  • •

    SpgC1qR shared high identity and similar 3D structure with human gC1qR.

  • •

    SpgC1qR dramatically suppressed WSSV proliferation in vivo.

  • •

    SpgC1qR specifically interacted with WSSV envelope protein VP28.

  • •

    SpgC1qR was involved in antiviral immunity of Scylla paramamosain.

Keywords: Scylla paramamosain, gC1qR homologue, WSSV envelope protein, Antiviral immunity

Abstract

Although human gC1qR is a multi-ligand binding protein with diverse biological functions, the functions of invertebrate gC1qR homologues remain largely unknown. In the present study, we characterized a novel gC1qR homologue, namely SpgC1qR, from mud crab Scylla paramamosain. SpgC1qR shared high identity and similar three-dimensional structure with human gC1qR. After challenge with White spot syndrome virus (WSSV), the transcripts of SpgC1qR were significantly increased, suggesting that SpgC1qR may be involved in antiviral immune response. To reveal the likely antiviral activity of SpgC1qR, the proliferation profile of WSSV in SpgC1qR-silenced crabs was examined. The result showed that knockdown of SpgC1qR by RNAi facilitated viral proliferation in vivo. This result was further confirmed by a SpgC1qR pre-incubation assay, in which pre-incubating WSSV particles with rSpgC1qR dramatically suppressed viral replication. Moreover, a GST pull-down assay revealed that SpgC1qR specifically bound to the viral envelope protein VP28. These findings clearly demonstrated that SpgC1qR specifically interacted with viral envelope protein VP28 and restricted WSSV replication, suggesting that it played a crucial role in anti-WSSV immune response of mud crab. This study provided new insights into the antiviral mechanism mediated by SpgC1qR and the biological functions of invertebrate gC1qR homologues.

1. Introduction

The globular 'head' of complement component C1q receptor (gC1qR) is a multifunctional and multiligand binding protein, named after its ability to bind to the globular head of complement C1q subcomponent. Human gC1qR was first isolated from Raji cells as a 33 kD glycoprotein [1], and it was also designated as P33, p32, C1qBP, or TAP on the basis of its diverse biological functions [2]. Studies have shown that human gC1qR is mainly distributed in the mitochondrial matrix, but it can also be detected on the surface of cells, especially under abnormal conditions of the host (disease or stress). This protein can be secreted into outside of cells in a soluble form [3] or expressed on the cell surface serving as a binding site for plasma and microbial proteins [4].

Human gC1qR is a multi-ligand binding protein involved in various ligand-mediated cellular responses. Studies have shown that it can bind various types of ligands and display a variety of biological functions, such as activating the complement system, participating in tumor angiogenesis, inducing apoptosis, and participating in pathogen infection and inflammatory reactions [2, 5, 6]. Among them, the positive and negative effects of gC1qRs on pathogen infection have become the focus of functional research. A few reports have shown that human gC1qR acts as receptors for many pathogens and promotes viral and bacterial infection. It binds to the core proteins of adenovirus and hepatitis B virus and promotes viral infection and proliferation [7, 8]. Knockdown of human gC1qR by RNA interference (RNAi) significantly reduces the binding and infection of hantavirus to human lung epidermal cells [9]. In addition, it has been reported that human gC1qR on the surface of cells can promote the infection of Staphylococcus aureus and the spores of Bacillus cereus by binding to certain bacterial components [10], [11], [12]. However, recent studies have demonstrated that some gC1qR homologues suppress bacterial infection. Human gC1qR competitively binds to hyaluronidase secreted by Streptococcus pneumoniae participating in antibacterial immunity [13]. Several crustacean gC1qRs interact with some bacterial components and play important roles in antibacterial immune responses [14], [15], [16], [17], [18].

White spot syndrome virus (WSSV), an enveloped double-stranded DNA virus, is a serious pathogen to many crustacean species [19], [20], [21]. WSSV belongs to a new virus family Nimaviridae under a new genus Whispovirus. It contains a 305-kb circular genome DNA, which encodes ∼180 predicted proteins [22, 23]. To date, more than 40 WSSV structural proteins have been identified using proteomic methods [24, 25]. VP28, VP26, VP24, and VP19 are the four major viral envelope proteins and they constitute the major content of the entire envelope. Among them, VP28 is crucial for virus entry [26]. Although current studies have shown that some immune components play important roles in antiviral immune defense of crustaceans [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], the exact molecular mechanisms on how the innate immune system resists WSSV infection remain elusive.

Scylla paramamosain (mud crab) is an economically important crustacean species widely distributed in China and Indo-West Pacific countries. In the current study, we characterized a gC1qR homologue, namely SpgC1qR, from S. paramamosain. We analyzed the similarity of SpgC1qR with human gC1qR and investigated its potential antiviral function. Our study revealed that SpgC1qR interacted with viral envelope protein VP28 and dramatically inhibited WSSV replication, suggesting that it played a crucial role in antiviral immune response of mud crab. This study provided new insights into the antiviral mechanism mediated by SpgC1qR and the biological functions of invertebrate gC1qR homologues.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Reagents and chemicals

TIANamp Marine Animals DNA Kit was obtained from Tiangen Biotech (Beijing, China). RNAiso Plus, First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit, and SYBR Premix Ex Taq Polymerase were purchased from TaKaRa Biotech (Dalian, China). GST Fusion Protein Purification Kit and His-tagged Protein Purification Kit were purchased from GenScript (Nanjing, China).

2.2. Mud crab challenge and tissue collection

Mud crabs (approximately 150 g each) purchased from a farm in Chongming County (Shanghai, China) were temporarily cultured in aerated seawater in tanks (400 L) before conducting experiments. Healthy crabs were selected to investigate the tissue distribution of SpgC1qR and its expression profiles after WSSV challenge. Prior to dissection, hemolymph was released from healthy crabs with sterilized syringe preloading ice-cold anticoagulant buffer [34], and then the hemocytes were collected after centrifugation at 800 × g for 15 min at 4 °C for RNA extraction. Subsequently, other tissues of healthy mud crabs, including the heart, hepatopancreas, gills, stomach, intestine, ovary and muscle, were cut, washed with sterile PBS, and collected for following total RNA extraction. The total RNAs from hemocytes and other tissues were applied to investigate tissue distribution of SpgC1qR. To examine the expression profile after viral challenge, healthy mud crabs were randomly selected and divided into two groups. Purified WSSV particles (1 × 105 copies) in 100 µL of PBS were injected into the base of the fifth leg of mud crabs, and an equal volume of PBS was served as a control. The gills of mud crabs were sampled at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h post injection. For each sample, at least three crabs were used to eliminate individual differences. Two other batches of RNA samples isolated previously at different times were used to eliminate the differences among batches.

2.3. Total RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis

The total RNAs from hemocytes and other tissues were isolated with RNAiso Plus reagent. The contaminated genomic DNA during total RNA extraction was removed with DNase I (Promega, USA). cDNA templates were synthesized with total RNAs following the manufacturer's instructions of First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit.

2.4. Bioinformatic analysis

The similarity of SpgC1qR with other gC1qR homologues in invertebrates and vertebrates was analyzed using the online BLAST program (BLASTP) (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Signal peptide prediction was carried out using SignalP [35]. The mitochondrial targeting sequence and putative domains were predicted by MITOPROT programs (http://ihg2.helmholtz-muenchen.de/ihg/mitoprot.html) and SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/), respectively. ProtParam (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/) was used to predict and analyze the physical and chemical properties of SpgC1qR, including relative molecular weight (Mw), theoretical isoelectric point, cell attachment sequence (arginyl-glycyl-aspartic acid, RGD) and amino acid composition. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using ClustalX 2.0 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/tools/clustalw2) and GENEDOC. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 7.0 software [36]. The three-dimensional (3D) structure of SpgC1qR MAM33 (the domain of mitochondrial acidic matrix protein of 33 kDa) was predicted through the Phyre server [37] using the crystal structure of human gC1qR MAM33 (PDB ID: d1P32, chain A) as template. The predicted quaternary structure of SpgC1qR trimer was modeled by superimposing three individuals according to the structure of human gC1qR MAM33 trimer. The 3D structures of SpgC1qR MAM33 and quaternary structure of SpgC1qR MAM33 trimer were generated by Discovery Studio Visualizer.

2.5. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was conducted to determine the expression level of SpgC1qR in a real-time thermal cycler Quantstudio 6 Flex (ABI, USA) following a previous protocol [38]. A pair of primers (RF and RR; Table 1) was designed to produce a 191 bp amplicon of SpgC1qR. Another pair of primers (18SRF and 18SRR; Table 1) was used to amplify a 121 bp fragment of 18S rRNA as reference. The total volume was 20 µL (10 µL of 2 × SYBR Premix Ex Taq, 2 µL of cDNA, and 4 µL of each primer). qRT-PCR was programmed as follows: 95 °C for 3 min, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 60 s. and a melt from 60 °C to 95 °C. All tests were performed thrice with individual templates. The 2−△CT method was used to calculate the relative expression level of SpgC1qR in different tissues, and the algorithm of 2−△△CT was utilized to analyze the expression profile after WSSV infection [39]. Unpaired t-test was used to determine significant differences (*, P < 0.05).

Table 1.

Sequences of primers used in this study.

Primers Sequence (5′–3′)
Real-time PCR
RF TTGTGGGACCCGTTGACTTG
RR TGCGAACTCGTTAGTGATGCCT
18S rRNA
18SF CAGACAAATCGCTCCACCAAC
18SR GACTCAACACGGGGAACCTCA
Protein expression
SpgC1qREF TACTCAGAATTCCTACAGGAGGAAATTGTG
SpgC1qRER TACTCACTCGAGACACTACTTGCGCTTGAC
RNAi
SpgC1qRiF GCGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGTTGAGTTTCTACAGGAG
SpgC1qRiR GCGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCACTACTTGCGCTTGACG
EGFPiF GCGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGTGGTCCCAATTCTCGTGGAC
EGFPiR GCGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCTTGAAGTTGACCTTGATGCC
WSSV detection
WSSVRF AGCTCCAACACCTCCTCCTTC
WSSVRR TTACTCGGTCTCAGTGCCAGA

Restriction enzyme sites were shown in bold and italics.

2.6. RNA interference (RNAi) of SpgC1qR

RNAi assay was performed using a previously reported method with slight modifications [40]. In brief, a partial SpgC1qR DNA fragment was amplified by PCR with primers linked with the T7 promoter (SpgC1qRiF and SpgC1qRiR; Table 1), and then it was used as the template to produce double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) with an in vitro T7 transcription kit (Takara, Dalian, China). EGFP dsRNA (dsEGFP) was also synthesized as the negative control with the primers listed in Table 1 (EGFPiF and EGFPiR). Mud crabs (approximately 20 g each) were randomly divided into two groups. Each crab was injected with dsSpgC1qR (40 μg) or with the same amount of dsEGFP at the base of the fifth leg. At 24 h post-injection, gills were collected for RNA extraction, and RNAi efficiency was then determined by qRT-PCR with the total RNA. Experiments were performed independently for three times. For each test, at least four crabs were used for each group. Unpaired Student's t-test was used to determine significant differences (**, P < 0.01).

2.7. Profiles of WSSV proliferation affected by RNAi of SpgC1qR or by pre-incubation with rSpgC1qR

Mud crabs (∼ 20 g each) were randomly divided into two groups (15 crabs per group), and each crab was injected with dsRNA (dsSpgC1qR or dsEGFP) to knockdown the expression of SpgC1qR. After silencing SpgC1qR, each crab was injected with purified WSSV virions (2 × 104 copies). The dsEGFP-treated mud crabs were also injected with the same amount of WSSV serving as the control. Gills were sampled to extract genomic DNA for WSSV quantification at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h post-WSSV injection. The WSSV copies in gills at each time point were calculated according to a previously developed method [41]. The profile of WSSV proliferation affected by pre-incubation with rSpgC1qR was also investigated. Mud crabs (∼100 g each) were randomly divided into two groups (25 crabs per group). Prepared WSSV virions (1 × 105 copies) were pre-incubated with rSpgC1qR (200 μg/mL), or with GST protein at room temperature for 30 min, and then injected into each crab in the corresponding groups. The gills were sampled at 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h post-infection to isolate genomic DNA for calculating the virus copies by qPCR through the same method. Unpaired Student's t-test was used to determine significant differences (**, P < 0.01).

2.8. Recombinant expression and purification of SpgC1qR

Based on SpgC1qR cDNA sequence, a pair of primers, SpgC1qREF and SpgC1qRER (Table 1), were designed to amplify the sequence encoding the mature peptide. After digestion with two restriction enzymes, the obtained DNA fragment was inserted into a pGEX-4T-1 expression vector. Subsequently, the recombinant vector was transformed into competent Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) cells for over-expression. After induction expression with isopropyl-β-d-thio-galactoside (IPTG) at 28 °C, the bacteria pellets were collected through centrifugation and were re-suspended in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 for probe sonication lysis. The recombinant SpgC1qR (rSpgC1qR) and GST were respectively purified using glutathoine Sepharose 4B chromatography following the instructions of the manufacturer. Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method. The His-tagged VP28 of WSSV was overexpressed and purified with Ni-NTA His-Binding Resin by using the bacterial strains developed in our previous study.

2.9. GST pull-down assay

GST pull-down assay was performed according to a previously reported method with slight modifications [42]. A total of 150 μL of glutathione–Sepharose 4B resin (50% beads slurry) after washing with PBS was incubated with a mixture of GST-fused SpgC1qR (15 μg) and the recombinant viral protein VP28 (rVP28; 15 μg) for 2 h at room temperature. GST served as the control. After incubation, the samples were washed thoroughly with PBS, and then the proteins were eluted by adding PBS containing 10 mM reduced glutathione. The eluates were subjected to 12.5% SDS-PAGE and analyzed after staining the gel with Coomassie blue.

2.10. Ethical statement

Mud crabs used in this study are not protected or endangered species. Besides, no genetically modified organism used in the study. According to the national regulation (Fisheries Law of the People's Republic of China), no permission was required to collect the animals and no formal ethics approval was required for this study.

3. Results

3.1. cDNA cloning of SpgC1qR

RACE-PCR analysis was used to obtain the full-length cDNA sequence of SpgC1qR in mud crab S. paramamosain. The complete sequence of 1204 bp possessed an open reading frame of 822 bp encoding a 273-amino acid protein, a 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of 90 bp, and a 3′ UTR of 292 bp with a poly(A) tail. Fig. 1A shows the nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences. No putative signal peptide was predicted, and a mitochondrial acidic matrix protein of 33 kDa (MAM33) domain (residues 84–270) was found in the deduced protein sequence. Using the MITOPROT program, a 59-amino-acid-long mitochondrial targeting sequence was found at the N-terminus of this deduced protein sequence. An RGD motif or cell adhesive sequence between mitochondrial targeting sequence and MAM33 domain was also found. The mature SpgC1qR protein had a theoretical Mw and pI of 23.7 kDa and 4.47, respectively.

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

The sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis of SpgC1qR. (A) The full-length cDNA and translated amino acid sequences of SpgC1qR. The mitochondrial acidic matrix protein of 33 kDa (MAM33) domain is shadowed and the stop codon is indicated by the asterisk (*). The mitochondrial targeting sequence and cell attachment sequence (arginyl-glycyl-aspartic acid) are shown in red and blue letters, respectively. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of the retrieved gC1qRs according to the BLASTP results. The NJ tree was produced with the MEGA 7.0 software. The gC1qRs originated from both invertebrates and vertebrates. The corresponding GenBank accession numbers are shown in the figure. SpgC1qR from the mud crab is marked with a red triangle.

3.2. Similarity, phylogenetic and 3D analyses

BLASTP search analysis revealed that SpgC1qR was highly identical (more than 60%) with most crustacean gC1qR homologs. For example, it shared 88% identity with Portunus trituberculatus PtgC1qR (accession number, AYV97197.1), 74% with Eriocheir sinensis EsgC1qR (ANN46490.1), 74% with Penaeus vannamei PvgC1qR (AFY05650.1), and 72% with Macrobrachium rosenbergii MrgC1qR (AJE28353.1). SpgC1qR also shared more than 40% identity with most of the other reported gC1qR homologues. In addition, the alignments of the representative crustacean gC1qRs showed that the amino acids in MAM33 domain were quite conserved (Fig. 2A). By contrast, the short amino acid sequences between mitochondrial targeting sequences and MAM33 domains were not very conserved, which vary greatly in length though they all had a common RGD motif (Fig. 1S). The high similarities among gC1qR homologues suggested that they might have similar biological functions, and the conserved RGDs and MAM33 domains may be responsible for their similar functions.

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

Sequence characteristics and structure of SpgC1qR MAM33. (A) The characteristics of MAM33 domain. Sp, Scylla paramamosain; Pc, Penaeus chinensis (AFJ59951.1); Pm, Penaeus monodon (ADV18978.1); Pv, Penaeus vannamei (AFY05650.1); Pl, Pacifastacus leniusculus (AEC50078.1); Mr, Macrobrachium rosenbergii (AJE28353.1); Pac, Palaemon carinicauda (AFY05651.1); Dm, Drosophila melanogaster (NP_611243.1); Hs, Homo sapiens (NP_001203.1); Mm, Mus musculus (NP_031599.2). (B) The 3D structure of SpgC1qR MAM33 was predicted using the crystal structure of human gC1qR MAM33 (PDB ID: d1P32, chain A) as template. (C) The predicted quaternary structure of SpgC1qR trimer was modeled by superimposing three individuals. The 3D structures of SpgC1qR MAM33 and quaternary structure of SpgC1qR MAM33 trimer were generated by Discovery Studio Visualizer.

A phylogenetic tree was constructed with SpgC1qR and other gC1qRs from both invertebrates and vertebrates to analyze the evolutionary relationship among them. The phylogenetic tree demonstrated the arthropod gC1qRs could form one big meaningful group with the high knot value of 99, and the vertebrate gC1qRs including fishes, tropical clawed frog, and mammalians were clustered into another big meaningful group. Furthermore, in the arthropod cluster, the crustacean gC1qRs formed a unique subgroup with the knot value of 100. This phylogenetic tree indicated that SpgC1qR had a much closer evolutionary relationship with other crustacean gC1qRs than insect and vertebrate gC1qRs (Fig. 1B).

Similarity analysis showed that SpgC1qR MAM33 shared 32.8% identity with that of human gC1qR. Given that the identity between these two peptides was not very high, Phyre server was recommended to predict the 3D model. Fig. 2B shows that the predicted 3D model of SpgC1qR MAM33 comprised seven consecutive antiparallel β-strands flanked by one N-terminal and two C-terminal α-helices (very short β-strand or α-helices was ignored), which is similar to the 3D structures of human gC1qR MAM33. Besides, similar to the quaternary structure of human gC1qR MAM33, three monomers of SpgC1qR MAM33 also form a trimer with a doughnut-shaped structure (Fig. 2C). This finding suggests that SpgC1qR may have similar biological activities with human gC1qR.

3.3. SpgC1qR was highly expressed in ovary and upregulated after WSSV challenge

QRT-PCR was conducted to investigate tissue distribution of SpgC1qR. Fig. 3A shows that SpgC1qR was expressed in all examined tissues and it showed the highest expression level in the ovary, followed by the hepatopancreas, heart, hemocytes, intestine and gills; the expression level of SpgC1qR in the stomach or muscle was much lower than that in other tested tissues. Given that the gill is an important immune tissue and a target tissue for WSSV invasion, the time-course expression profile of SpgC1qR in gills after WSSV challenge was further analyzed. We found that SpgC1qR was significantly upregulated from 48 to 72 h post injection, and it reached the maximum level at 48 h post injection (Fig. 3B). This result suggested that SpgC1qR may participate in the antiviral immunity of mud crab.

Fig. 3.

Fig 3

Tissue distribution and expression profiles of SpgC1qR in mud crab. (A) The tissue distribution of SpgC1qR in different tissues of healthy mud crabs. (B) The time-course expression profile of SpgC1qR in the gills after challenges with WSSV was detected by qRT-PCR. The asterisks indicate significant differences (*: P < 0.05) compared with the control.

3.4. SpgC1qR knockdown facilitated WSSV proliferation

To clarify the potential antiviral activity exerted by SpgC1qR on viral replication, mud crabs were initially injected with dsSpgC1qR to silence SpgC1qR and then challenged with WSSV. As shown in Fig. 4A, SpgC1qR was successfully knocked down by injecting dsSpgC1qR because the expression level of this gene at 24 h after injection with dsSpgC1qR was only about 30% of that in the control crabs treated with dsEGFP. Subsequently, the proliferation profiles of WSSV in dsRNA-treated crabs were investigated by analyzing viral-genome copies (DNA virus) through qPCR. Results showed that the quantities of WSSV in the gills of SpgC1qR-silenced crabs were much higher than those in control crabs at 48, and 72 h post-viral infection (Fig. 4B). Collectively, these results clearly demonstrated that knockdown of SpgC1qR significantly facilitated WSSV proliferation in vivo, suggesting that SpgC1qR was a critical antiviral factor.

Fig. 4.

Fig 4

Silencing SpgC1qR enhanced WSSV replication in gills. (A) RNAi efficiency of SpgC1qR in gills was evaluated by qRT-PCR at 24 h after injection with dsRNA (dsEGFP or dsSpgC1qR). dsEGFP was injected as negative control. (B) WSSV was inoculated at 24 h after dsRNA injection. The number of viral copies in gills was assessed through qPCR at different time points (0, 24, 48, and 72 h) after WSSV injection. Asterisks indicated significant differences (**, P < 0.01) compared with the control.

3.5. The mature peptide of SpgC1qR was successfully expressed in a soluble form

To investigate the possible biological activity of SpgC1qR, the mature peptide of SpgC1qR was recombinantly expressed in E. coli. After the bacterial cells were lysed and centrifuged, rSpgC1qR was detected in the supernatants, indicating that it was expressed in a soluble form. Accordingly, the protein was further purified through affinity chromatography. The predicted MW of rSpgC1qR was 50.4 kDa, which approximately agreed with the size of the major band that appeared in the corresponding purified protein lane (Fig. 5A). In addition, GST was expressed and purified in the same way, and used as the control (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5.

Fig 5

SpgC1qR significantly inhibited WSSV proliferation. SDS–PAGE analysis of rSpgC1qR (A) and GST (B) expressed in E. coli. Lanes 1 and 4, total proteins of E. coli containing expression vector without IPTG; Lanes 2 and 5, total proteins of E. coli containing expression vector with IPTG induction; Lanes 3 and 6, the purified rSpgC1qR and GST protein; Lane M, protein marker. (C)SpgC1qR inhibited WSSV proliferation. Prepared WSSV particles were pre-incubated with rSpgC1qR or with GST tag protein and then injected into crabs. The number of virus copies in gills at each time point was determined by qPCR. Asterisks indicated significant differences (**, P < 0.01) compared with the control.

3.6. SpgC1qR protein exhibited strong inhibitory activity on WSSV replication

To further verify the antiviral role of SpgC1qR in the process of WSSV infection, the proliferation profile of WSSV in gills after the pre-incubation of viral particles with rSpgC1qR or GST protein was analyzed. Compared with WSSV particles pre-incubated with GST protein, the virus pre-incubated with rSpgC1qR dramatically inhibited WSSV proliferation at 48, 72, and 96 h post-injection because the pre-incubation of virus with rSpgC1qR resulted in much lower virus copies at 48, 72, and 96 h post-infection (Fig. 5C). This result suggested that SpgC1qR played an important role in the antiviral activity of mud crab.

3.7. SpgC1qR interacted specifically with the WSSV structural protein VP28

Considering that SpgC1qR suppressed WSSV proliferation, we speculated that this molecule may interact with certain components on WSSV particles. Thus, a GST pull-down assay was performed to test the binding ability of SpgC1qR to a major structural protein VP28 given that the latter is the most important envelope protein of WSSV mediating viral infection. Results showed that rSpgC1qR could specifically bind to rVP28, but GST protein did not have any apparent binding activity to this viral protein (Fig. 6A and B). This finding clearly demonstrated that SpgC1qR specifically interacted with VP28, implying that VP28 is a target component that could be recognized by SpgC1qR.

Fig. 6.

Fig 6

GST Pull-down assay was conducted to examine the binding activity of SpgC1qR with viral structural protein. Viral structural protein rVP28 was mixed with rSpgC1qR or GST tag protein, and then incubated with Glutathione Sepharose 4B resin. The gels were visualized after staining with Coomassie blue. rSpgC1qR interacted with rVP28 (A) but GST tag protein did not (B).

4. Discussion

Though human gC1qR is a multi-ligand binding protein with diverse biological functions [2], the biological functions of invertebrate gC1qR homologues remain largely unknown. In the present study, we found that SpgC1qR shared high identity and similar 3D structure with human gC1qR. The expression of SpgC1qR was significantly elevated after WSSV infection. Knockdown of SpgC1qR by RNAi facilitated viral proliferation in vivo; pre-incubating WSSV particles with rSpgC1qR dramatically suppressed viral replication. Moreover, SpgC1qR specifically bound to the viral envelope protein VP28. These findings revealed that SpgC1qR played a crucial role in anti-WSSV immune responses.

Though SpgC1qR was defined as a receptor protein for complement subcomponent C1q in this study, the fact that invertebrate animals lack the classical complement system of high animals indicates that SpgC1qR may have some extra biological functions different from mammalian gC1qRs. In the present study, we found that crustacean gC1qRs displayed a more distant evolutionary relationship with vertebrate gC1qRs, but these crustacean gC1qRs themselves shared very high similarities and had close evolutionary relationships. Considering that most reported crustacean gC1qRs possess similar antibacterial activities [14], [15], [16], [17], we speculated that their similar antibacterial abilities might be due to their conserved sequences and closer evolutionary relationships among them. The distant evolutionary relationship of vertebrate gC1qRs from crustacean ones suggested that the former might have evolved certain biological functions quite different from that of the latter. Herein, human gC1qR exhibiting diverse activities is a good example. Interestingly, we found that SpgC1qR responded to WSSV infection participating in antiviral immunity. We speculated that crustacean gC1qRs might have a similar antiviral function because crustacean gC1qRs shared high similarities with each other. This ability is also different from human gC1qR, which facilitates the infection of several kinds of viruses [7], [8], [9].

Human gC1qR exhibits a variety of biological functions by binding to different ligands. In addition to interacting with the globular ‘head’ domain of the plasma complement component C1q to activate complement system, human gC1qR interacts with viral proteins of certain viruses [7], [8], [9]. Through binding to the targeted viral components, human gC1qR promotes viral infection and maintains virus persistence. Besides, human gC1qR interacts with some bacterial components. It functions as a crucial immune component preventing bacterial infection by inhibiting hyaluronidase activity [13], or promotes bacterial infection by enhancing its binding ability to fibrinogen [11] or by facilitating the attachment of exosporium to host cells [12]. Considering that SpgC1qR had a distant evolutionary relationship from human gC1qR, it is hard to precisely predict the possible function of SpgC1qR. Thus, the possible biological function was examined in this study. We found that SpgC1qR specifically interacted with a viral envelope protein VP28. Different from human gC1qR promoting the infection of most viruses by binding to certain viral proteins, our study revealed that SpgC1qR suppressed WSSV proliferation. To verify this conclusion, we first showed that knockdown of SpgC1qR remarkably facilitate WSSV replication, and then demonstrated that pre-incubating WSSV particles with rSpgC1qR significantly suppressed viral proliferation. These findings suggested that SpgC1qR was an important antiviral immune molecule.

WSSV is one of the most devastating pathogens in crustacean aquaculture [19], [20], [21]. Although current researches revealed that some immune molecules play essential roles in anti-WSSV immune responses [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], the exact immune mechanisms of how the innate immune system of crustaceans defends against WSSV infection remain elusive. Envelope proteins play a crucial role in viral infection and are regarded as the first-line molecules to interact with the host. VP28, the most abundant envelope protein of WSSV, is involved in the systemic infection of shrimp by WSSV [26]. The structural study revealed that VP28 was anchored to the outer surface of WSSV as a trimer through the N-terminal transmembrane regions, which makes its mushroom-like structure (trimer) protrude outside the envelope, and facilitates its interaction with certain components of host [43]. Besides, although human gC1qR is a mitochondrial matrix protein located predominantly in the mitochondrial matrix, this protein can be detected in the nucleus and/or cell surface under abnormal circumstances [[4], [44]], such as microbial infection leading to cells lysis. Thus, the gC1qR on the cell surface can serve as a receptor for bacterial and viral proteins. Considering that gC1qR family members show relatively conserved overall structure, we speculated that SpgC1qR might possess similar basic biological characteristics to human gC1qR. This means that SpgC1qR may be present on the surface of cells when WSSV infection occurs, especially at the late stage of viral infection. Moreover, SpgC1qR has an RGD motif located outside the MAM domain of mature peptide, which is regarded as the ligand for a cell surface protein integrin. The interaction of the RGD motif with integrin would also enhance the binding of SpgC1qR to cell surface. This study showed SpgC1qR was highly expressed in the late stage of viral infection, which would lead to more SpgC1qR present on the surface of cells or in hemolymph to resist the invasion of WSSV particles. In addition, reports have shown that human gC1qR molecules are present in a form of doughnut-shaped structure [45]. Based on predicting 3D structure and superimposing three SpgC1qR monomers, we found that SpgC1qR also adopted a form of trimers with a doughnut-shaped structure, which had a central concave surface facilitating its interaction with the protruding structure of VP28. However, the detailed interaction mechanism of these two different trimers needs further study.

In conclusion, in this study, we identified a novel gC1qR homologue, SpgC1qR, and characterized its antiviral function and likely antiviral mechanism. A possible antiviral model mediated by the interaction of SpgC1qR with the major envelope protein VP28 was proposed. This study provided new insights for understanding the antiviral mechanism as well as the design and development of new antiviral drugs.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31101920, 31772886), and Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, CAFS (No. 2020TD41).

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.fsirep.2022.100052.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.docx (495.8KB, docx)

References

  • 1.Ghebrehiwet B., Lim B.L., Peerschke E.I., Willis A.C., Reid K.B. Isolation, cDNA cloning, and overexpression of a 33-kD cell surface glycoprotein that binds to the globular "heads" of C1q. J. Exp. Med. 1994;179(6):1809–1821. doi: 10.1084/jem.179.6.1809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Peerschke E.I., Ghebrehiwet B. The contribution of gC1qR/p33 in infection and inflammation. Immunobiology. 2007;212(4–5):333–342. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2006.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.van den Berg R.H., Prins F., Faber-Krol M.C., Lynch N.J., Schwaeble W., van Es L.A., Daha M.R. Intracellular localization of the human receptor for the globular domains of C1q. J. Immunol. 1997;158(8):3909–3916. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ghebrehiwet B., Lim B.L., Kumar R., Feng X., Peerschke E.I. gC1q-R/p33, a member of a new class of multifunctional and multicompartmental cellular proteins, is involved in inflammation and infection. Immunol. Rev. 2001;180:65–77. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-065x.2001.1800106.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chowdhury A.R., Ghosh I., Datta K. Excessive reactive oxygen species induces apoptosis in fibroblasts: role of mitochondrially accumulated hyaluronic acid binding protein 1 (HABP1/p32/gC1qR) Exp. Cell Res. 2008;314(3):651–667. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.10.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chowdhary A.R., Komol A., Ghosh I., Datta K. Hyaluronan binding protein 1 (HABP1/p32/gC1qR): a new perspective in tumor development. Hyaluronan Cancer Biol. 2009:51–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Matthews D.A., Russell W.C. Adenovirus core protein V interacts with p32–a protein which is associated with both the mitochondria and the nucleus. J. Gen. Virol. 1998:1677–1685. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-79-7-1677. Pt 7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cummings K.L., Rosen H.R., Hahn Y.S. Frequency of gC1qR+CD4+ T cells increases during acute hepatitis C virus infection and remains elevated in patients with chronic infection. Clin. Immunol. 2009;132(3):401–411. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2009.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Choi Y., Kwon Y.C., Kim S.I., Park J.M., Lee K.H., Ahn B.Y. A hantavirus causing hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome requires gC1qR/p32 for efficient cell binding and infection. Virology. 2008;381(2):178–183. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.08.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tantral L., Panessa-Warren B.J., Tortora G.T., Wong S.S., Warren J.B., Ghebrehiwet B. The process of B. cereus spore attachment induces upregulation of cell surface gC1q-R/p33. Mol. Immunol. 2004;41(2–3):334. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Peerschke E.I., Bayer A.S., Ghebrehiwet B., Xiong Y.Q. gC1qR/p33 blockade reduces Staphylococcus aureus colonization of target tissues in an animal model of infective endocarditis. Infect. Immun. 2006;74(8):4418–4423. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01794-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ghebrehiwet B., Tantral L., Titmus M.A., Panessa-Warren B.J., Tortora G.T., Wong S.S., Warren J.B. The exosporium of B. cereus contains a binding site for gC1qR/p33: implication in spore attachment and/or entry. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2007;598:181–197. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-71767-8_13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yadav G., Prasad R., Jha B.K., Rai V., Bhakuni V., Datta K. Evidence for inhibitory interaction of hyaluronan-binding protein 1 (HABP1/p32/gC1qR) with Streptococcus pneumoniae hyaluronidase. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284(6):3897–3905. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M804246200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li X.C., Du Z.Q., Lan J., Zhang X.W., Mu Y., Zhao X.F., Wang J.X. A novel pathogen-binding gC1qR homolog, FcgC1qR, in the Chinese white shrimp, Fenneropenaeus chinensis. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2012;36(2):400–407. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2011.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang L.S., Liu X.J., Liu W.J., Li X.L., Qiu L.H., Huang J.H., Jiang S.G. Characterization of complement 1q binding protein of tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon, and its C1q binding activity. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2013;34(1):82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2012.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ye T., Huang X., Wang X.W., Shi Y.R., Hui K.M., Ren Q. Characterization of a gC1qR from the giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015;43(1):200–208. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2014.12.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Huang Y., Wang W., Ren Q. Function of gC1qR in innate immunity of Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2016;61:34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2016.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang J.Q., Liu Y.J., Li Y.Y., Su N.K., Zhou Y.R., Xiang J.H., Sun Y.Y. Biological function of a gC1qR homolog (EcgC1qR) of Exopalaemon carinicauda in defending bacteria challenge. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018;82:378–385. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2018.08.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shekhar M.S., Ponniah A.G. Recent insights into host–pathogen interaction in white spot syndrome virus infected penaeid shrimp. J. Fish Dis. 2015;38(7):599–612. doi: 10.1111/jfd.12279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Verbruggen B., Bickley L.K., van Aerle R., Bateman K.S., Stentiford G.D., Santos E.M., Tyler C.R. Molecular mechanisms of white spot syndrome virus infection and perspectives on treatments. Viruses. 2016;8(1):23. doi: 10.3390/v8010023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu L.K., Liu M.J., Li D.L., Liu H.P. Recent insights into anti-WSSV immunity in crayfish. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2020;116 doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2020.103947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.van Hulten M.C., Witteveldt J., Peters S., Kloosterboer N., Tarchini R., Fiers M., Sandbrink H., Lankhorst R.K., Vlak J.M. The white spot syndrome virus DNA genome sequence. Virology. 2001;286(1):7–22. doi: 10.1006/viro.2001.1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yang F., He J., Lin X., Li Q., Pan D., Zhang X., Xu X. Complete genome sequence of the shrimp white spot bacilliform virus. J. Virol. 2001;75(23):11811–11820. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.23.11811-11820.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Huang C., Zhang X., Lin Q., Xu X., Hu Z., Hew C.L. Proteomic analysis of shrimp white spot syndrome viral proteins and characterization of a novel envelope protein VP466. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2002;1(3):223–231. doi: 10.1074/mcp.m100035-mcp200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tsai J.M., Wang H.C., Leu J.H., Hsiao H.H., Wang A.H., Kou G.H., Lo C.F. Genomic and proteomic analysis of thirty-nine structural proteins of shrimp white spot syndrome virus. J. Virol. 2004;78(20):11360–11370. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.20.11360-11370.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.van Hulten M.C., Witteveldt J., Snippe M., Vlak J.M. White spot syndrome virus envelope protein VP28 is involved in the systemic infection of shrimp. Virology. 2001;285(2):228–233. doi: 10.1006/viro.2001.0928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dai X., Huang X., Zhang Z., Zhang R., Cao X., Zhang C., Wang K., Ren Q. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of two type II crustin genes in the oriental river prawn, Macrobrachium nipponense. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020;98:446–456. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2020.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gao J., Wang J.X., Wang X.W. MD-2 homologue recognizes the white spot syndrome virus lipid component and induces antiviral molecule expression in shrimp. J. Virol. 2019;203(5):1131–1141. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1900268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lan J.F., Li X.C., Sun J.J., Gong J., Wang X.W., Shi X.Z., Shi L.J., Weng Y.D., Zhao X.F., Wang J.X. Prohibitin interacts with envelope proteins of white spot syndrome virus and prevents infection in the red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. J. Virol. 2013;87(23):12756–12765. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02198-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li S., Lv X., Yu Y., Zhang X., Li F. Molecular and functional diversity of crustin-like genes in the shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Mar. Drugs. 2020;18(7):361. doi: 10.3390/md18070361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li H., Yin B., Wang S., Fu Q., Xiao B., Lǚ K., He J., Li C. RNAi screening identifies a new Toll from shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei that restricts WSSV infection through activating Dorsal to induce antimicrobial peptides. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14(9) doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gong Y., Kong T., Ren X., Chen J., Lin S., Zhang Y., Li S. Exosome-mediated apoptosis pathway during WSSV infection in crustacean mud crab. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zheng S.C., Xu J.Y., Liu H.P. Cellular entry of white spot syndrome virus and antiviral immunity mediated by cellular receptors in crustaceans. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019;93:580–588. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Söderhäll K., Smith V.J. Separation of the haemocyte populations of Carcinus maenas and other marine decapods, and prophenoloxidase distribution. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 1983;7(2):229–239. doi: 10.1016/0145-305x(83)90004-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nielsen H., Engelbrecht J., Brunak S., Heijne G.V. Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Eng. 1997;10(1):1–6. doi: 10.1093/protein/10.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kumar S., Stecher G., Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016;33(7):1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kelley L.A., Sternberg M.J. Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat. Protoc. 2009;4(3):363–371. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li X.C., Zhou J., Zhou J.F., Wang Y., Ma H., Wang Y., Zhao S., Fang W.H. SpBark suppresses bacterial infection by mediating hemocyte phagocytosis in an invertebrate model, Scylla paramamosain. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:1992. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang Y., Zhao S., Zhang B., Ma H.Y., Fang W.H., Sheng W.Q., Yang L.G., Li X.C. A novel ML domain-containing protein (SpMD2) functions as a potential LPS receptor involved in anti-Vibrio immune response. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2020;103 doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2019.103529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Du Z.Q., Ren Q., Huang A.M., Fang W.H., Zhou J.F., Gao L.J., Li X.C. A novel peroxinectin involved in antiviral and antibacterial immunity of mud crab, Scylla paramamosain. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013;40(12):6873–6881. doi: 10.1007/s11033-013-2805-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang Y., Zhang C., Fang W.H., Ma H.Y., Li X.C. SpCrus2 glycine-rich region contributes largely to the antiviral activity of the whole-protein molecule by interacting with VP26, a WSSV structural protein. Mar. Drugs. 2021;19:544. doi: 10.3390/md19100544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tang X., Wu J., Sivaraman J., Hew C.L. Crystal structures of major envelope proteins VP26 and VP28 from white spot syndrome virus shed light on their evolutionary relationship. J. Virol. 2007;81(12):6709–6717. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02505-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fogal V., Zhang L., Krajewski S., Ruoslahti E. Mitochondrial/cell-surface protein p32/gC1qR as a molecular target in tumor cells and tumor stroma. Cancer Res. 2008;68(17):7210–7218. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jiang J., Zhang Y., Krainer A.R., Xu R.M. Crystal structure of human p32, a doughnut-shaped acidic mitochondrial matrix protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96(7):3572–3577. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.docx (495.8KB, docx)

Articles from Fish and Shellfish Immunology Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES