Highlights
-
•
Prebiotics and probiotics can stimulate humoral and cell-mediated immunity.
-
•
Prebiotics and probiotics confer benefits in growth, immunostimulation, and disease control in crab culture.
-
•
Prebiotics and probiotics may be used as potential feed additives in crab culture.
Keywords: Prebiotics; Probiotics; Crab; Growth performance, immunity, disease resistance
Abstract
Crab species are economically important crustaceans with high demand in markets. Development of the culture system resulted in an increase in disease outbreaks. Disquisition and application of methods that can prevent and control diseases during the crab culture period are crucially essential. The application of prebiotics and probiotics to replace the overuse of antibiotics has practical significance in sustainability of the crab farming. Previously, both prebiotics and probiotics have shown to confer benefits in growth promotion, immunostimulation, and disease control in crab culture. These components can directly stimulate humoral immunity by increasing activities of lysozyme, phagocytosis, respiratory burst, and phenoloxidase. They also activate the cell-mediated immunity by binding to pattern recognition receptors expressed on immune cells and modulating cell signal transduction pathways. Furthermore, the mechanism of action and effectiveness in use of prebiotics and probiotics are summarized in this study, indicating the potential application of prebiotics and probiotics as feed additives in crab farming.
1. Introduction
Crabs are members of the order Decapoda, including a large number of species with about 4,500 species all over the world [1]. Crabs inhabit different milieu such as oceans, freshwater, and on land. Several crab species, such as the members of mud crab genus (Scylla), Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis), and blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus), have been known to be commercially important cultured crustaceans. Among them, members of the mud crab genus (including four species S. olivacea, S. paramamosain, S. serrata, and S. tranquebarica) are more popular in marine culture worldwide [2, 3]. Interestingly, crabs become seafood products with high demand in both local and international markets because of their nature in good flavor [3, 4]. In fact, the increased consumption of crab products needs an increase in aquaculture production. The crab aquaculture industry has emerged rapidly in countries and areas, such as Australia, China, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, and Taiwan [5, 6]. Crabs are cultured singly in the mangrove area, earthen ponds, concrete ponds, or in combination with shrimps and other species in a poly-culture system [3, 4]. The increase of industrial-scale aquaculture currently makes the cultured animals easy to face many challenges, including disease outbreaks. The disease outbreaks cause major losses in crab farming and indirectly impact sustainable aquaculture [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. In fact, antibiotics play an important role in preventing and controlling disease in aquaculture; however, the overuse of antibiotics can cause antibiotic resistance between infected animals and humans and direct impact on the surrounding environment [9]. It has shown that immunostimulants, probiotics, and vaccines can enhance the immunity and disease resistance and subsequently decrease antibiotic use in aquatic animals [14].
Prebiotics (known as beneficial compounds) and probiotics (beneficial microbial species) have been applied in aquatic animals and confer health benefits [15], [16], [17]. Prebiotics are also used as energy sources for the gut microorganisms improving health outcomes in the host [18]. The prebiotics, such as oligosaccharides, mannan oligosaccharide (MOS), galactooligosaccharide (GOS), arabinoxylan-oligosaccharide (AXOS), inulin, and β-glucan, have been documented providing promising results in growth performance, immune stimulation, and disease resistance of aquatic animals [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]. Recent studies showed that probiotics can also improve growth, contribute to digestion, enhance immune responses, and control diseases [8,[25], [26], [27], [28]]. The bacterial species belonging to the genera Bacillus, Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Aeromonas, Alteromonas, Arthrobacter, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, Microbacterium, Paenibacillus, Phaeobacter, Pseudoalteromonas, Pseudomonas, Rhodosporidium, Roseobacter, Streptomyces, and Vibrio have been shown as potential probiotic candidates for use in aquaculture [29], [30], [31]. In crabs, the application of prebiotics and probiotics is still limited. Until now, only one study regarding the application of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics as feed additives in crab has been reviewed [32]. In this review, we describe the current understanding of the regulation of innate immunity, mechanisms of action, and effectiveness of prebiotics and probiotics in crab species. The current study provides important evidence of the potential application of probiotics and prebiotics in the crab culture industry.
2. Regulation of innate immunity
The immune system, including innate and adaptive immunity, is crucially important during the life of animals. Of which, the innate immunity as the first line of defense protects hosts against invading pathogens by mechanisms that can be rapidly activated upon a threat recognition [33]. When a pathogen entranced the host, the innate immune system is firstly activated to eliminate the foreign intruder. The immune defense includes a progression of recognition of invading pathogens, transduction of a message to induce the production and release of substances inactivating the invaders, and neutralization of the harmfulness of invaders [34]. Similar to other invertebrates, crabs lack an adaptive immune system and their defense mainly depends on the innate immunity categorized into humoral and cellular immunity [35]. Certainly, immunostimulant effects of both prebiotics and probiotics in crabs have been investigated, which are important in studying the mechanism of action of dietary supplements on innate immune responses of hosts.
Hemocytes are one of the major components in crustacean immunity. Similar to vertebrate leukocytes, the crustacean hemocytes could mainly function in non-self-matter recognition and elimination, and in downstream coagulation [36]. Differentiation of hemocytes begins in the hematopoietic tissue and continues in the circulation [37]. According to the specific morphology and granularity, in S. olivacea, small granular cells containing small size granules (55.5%) was observed as the most populated cells among the four hemocytes, which are followed by hyaline cells (15.5%), mixed granular cells (15.5%), and large granular cells (13.5%) [38]. In S. paramamosain, hemocytes are differentiated as semigranulocytes (76.03%), hyalinocytes (18.70%), and granulocytes (5.27%) [39]. Generally, hemocytes are important in recognition, phagocytosis, clotting, melanization, cytotoxicity, prophenoloxidase (proPO) system activation, and antimicrobial peptides synthesis [40,41]. However, different types of hemocytes perform different functions in the animals [41]. Semigranulocytes have a role in encapsulation and a limited function in phagocytosis [40]. In the case of S. paramamosain, phagocytosis is mainly performed by granulocytes and semigranulocytes as compared with hyalinocytes after challenge with either Vibrio alginolyticus or viral double-stranded RNA analog Poly (I:C) [39]. In S. olivacea, only large granular cells have a strong phenoloxidase (PO) enzyme activity responding to white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) [38]. In the case of probiotic application, the total hemocyte count (THC) of S. paramamosian was significantly increased by feeding Enterococcus faecalis Y17, followed by Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection [42], but not significantly increased by feeding single or combined Bacillus subtilis E20 and Lactobacillus plantarum 7–40 [4], indicating different probiotics may have different manner affecting the immune system of their hosts. Interestingly, in Marsupenaeus japonicus, six types of hemocytes were categorized using the single-cell RNA sequencing based on their transcriptional profiles [43], suggesting the potential use of this method for having a better understanding on the types of hemocytes in crab species, as well as the mechanisms that hemocytes stimulated by the supplementation of prebiotics and probiotics.
The proPO system appears to be one of the most important components of the crustacean immune system, which can recognize a very small amount of microbial cell wall components and promote cell-to-cell communication to subsequently eliminate them [44,45]. The system is composed of a sequence of enzyme reactions that are activated only upon microbial cell wall components (including pathogen-associated molecular patterns-PAMPs) by the pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) [44]. PO is an important enzyme in the proPO system, serving as both recognition and effector components of the arthropod defense system [45]. An increase in PO activity in S. paramamosian fed B. subtilis, B. pumilus, E. faecalis Y17, or P. pentosaceus G11 indicated that these probiotics can stimulate the immune system through the proPO system [4,8,42].
Once the PAMPs are engulfed by hemocytes, which is in turn to produce a series of anti-microbial substances (called reactive oxygen species-ROS), such as superoxide anion (O2−), hydroxyl radical (OH−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and singlet oxygen (1O2)) [34,45]. The respiratory burst is referred to as the generation of superoxide anion [45]. ROS is important for the survival of organisms, which is controlled by anti-oxidant defense mechanisms, including superoxide dismutase (SOD) that scavenges the superoxide anion [34]. The probiotics, B. subtilis, B. pumilus, E. faecalis Y17, and P. pentosaceus G11, increased the activities of PO, respiratory burst, lysozyme, and SOD, or gene expression of CAT, LYS, proPO, and SOD in S. paramamosian [8,42]. The results suggested that these probiotics can stimulate the reactive oxygen intermediate system in mud crab. Additionally, in Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) fed with dietary supplementation with either MOS, a mixture of MOS and β-glucan, or a mixture of MOS and inulin, the activities of SOD, glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX), total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), alkaline phosphatase, acid phosphatase, lysozyme, PO, and respiratory burst was increased, whereas those of malondialdehyde (MDA) was decreased. This indicates the immunostimulation of the prebiotics in improving antioxidant capacity, preventing oxidative stress, and enhancing non-specific immunity in hosts [46].
Phagocytosis is important in the immune response against invading pathogens and involves several physiological processes, such as development, apoptosis, tissue repair, and host defense in the eukaryotes [47]. Phagocytosis includes a process of recognition, engulfment of particles larger than 0.5 μm into membrane-bound vacuoles (known as phagosomes), and initiation of a signaling cascade to generate phagolysosome by fusion of phagosome with lysosomes [47,48]. Finally, particles or pathogens within the phagolysosome will be degraded and cleared by the hydrolytic enzymes [47]. Yeh et al. [4] noted that B. subtilis E20 significantly increased the ability to engulf the pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus. This result indicated associations between the cell components or metabolites of probiotics with the modification in immune defenses in the hemocytes, leading to an enhancement in disease resistance of their hosts.
The signaling pathways are important in the innate immune responses, which are regulated by the binding of PRRs with PAMPs [44]. The signaling pathways, including the toll pathway, immune deficiency pathway, JAK/STAT pathway, and prophenol/phenoloxidase cascade (also known as the proPO system), are essential in the innate immunity of mud crab [6,49]. Activation of the signaling pathways leads to the expression of immune-related genes in order to prevent invading pathogens. The expression of genes associated with the signaling pathways is important in evaluating the immunostimulant effects of the supplements. A recent study showed that dietary supplementation with MOS alone or in combination with β-glucan or with inulin promotes the expression of ES-PT, ES-Relish, ES-LITAF, p38MAPK, and Crustin, in E. sinensis [46]. This suggests that prebiotics can stimulate the innate immune system of the crabs through the activation of signaling pathways that link to the PRRs expressed on immune cells.
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are short peptides (<10 KDa) with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities in the host immune response against the invasion of intruding microorganisms [50,51]. In mud crab, a relatively large number of AMPs have been found and summarized (see Yusof, Badruddin Ahmad [51], for a review of mud crab AMPs). AMPs provide an immediate and rapid immune response in the innate immune system to enhance responses to pathogens [52]. In the case of E. sinensis, the diets added to a mixture of MOS and either β-glucan or inulin significantly increased the expression of Crustin in the hepatopancreas, which suggests the immunostimulant effect of prebiotics on the antibacterial ability of the crabs [46].
3. Prebiotics
Prebiotics are non-digestible food when supplied to the food can selectively stimulate the growth and activity of specific bacterial species in the gut and confer health benefits to hosts [53,54]. A prebiotic that is classified must (1) resist the digestion, absorption, and adsorption processes in the gut of the host, (2) be fermented by gut microbes, and (3) selectively stimulate the growth and/or the activity of one or a number of bacteria harboring the gastrointestinal tract [54]. As the author's thoughts, each of these criteria is crucially important, but the third one seems to be the most important and difficult to satisfy. This is especially true because this step requires anaerobic sampling and reliable quantitative microbial analysis is performed with a wide range of microbial species [55]. Thus, this needs to concern with the fermentable substrates in the diet, availability for the microbes, and selective metabolism [54]. Generally, dietary fibers are fermented by the anaerobic gut microbiota, leading to the production of lactic acid, acetate, propionate, butyrate, and gasses (H2, CO2, and CH4) [16]. Of these metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, which are directly used by the hosts, confer beneficial health effects in aquatic animals [56]. In aquaculture, studies have investigated the role of prebiotics in the modulation of the intestinal microbiota of finfish and crustaceans [20,22,57]. The results have revealed the promising role of prebiotics in improving growth performance, immunity, and disease resistance against pathogens, as well as modulating gut microbiota [16]. However, this information is still relatively limited in crabs. To date, there is only one study investigated the effect of mannanoligosaccharides (MOS), β-glucan, and inulin on growth, anti-oxidation activity, non-specific immunity and disease resistance in Chinese mitten crab (E. sinensis) [46]. A list of prebiotics studied for application in crab aquaculture is shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
List of prebiotics and probiotics applied in crab aquaculture.
Type of intervention | Ingredients | Target hosts | Dosage and duration | Parameters examined | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prebiotic | Mannan oligosaccharide (MOS), β-glucan, inulin |
Eriocheir sinensis (0.26±0.01 g) |
MOS (3 g/kg), MOS+β-glucan (3 g/kg MOS+1.5 g/kg β-glucan), MOS+inulin (3 g/kg MOS+10 g/kg inulin), 8 weeks | Growth performance, anti-oxidation activity, immunity, disease resistance | Lu et al. [46] |
Galactooligosaccharides (GOS), resistant starch |
Scylla paramamosain (63.6 ± 8.8 g) |
0.0125 g/mL of culture medium (PY), in vitro study | Short-chain fatty acid production, gut microbiota | Tran et al. [57] | |
Probiotic |
Bacillus spp. (PondPlus®, Novozymes®) |
S. paramamosain (larvae) |
5 × 102, 1 × 103, 2 × 103, 1 × 104, 2 × 104 cfu/mL, Zoea 1 – Zoea 5 | Survival rate, inhibition of pathogen growth, water quality, larval stage index | Talib et al. [64] |
Bacillus licheniformis |
Portunus pelagicus (0.1–0.15 g) |
0.0, 1.5 × 107, 3 × 107, 6 × 107 mL/kg diet, 45 days | Growth performance, survival rate, molting, inhibition of pathogen growth | Boonyapakdee and Bhujel [65] | |
B. licheniformis | Coenobita spp. | In vitro study | Inhibition of the growth of bacteria isolated from the shell of hermit crab | Gallini et al. [66] | |
Bacillus pumilus |
S. paramamosain (5.2 g) |
105 cfu/g diet, 30 days | Immunity, disease resistance | Wu et al. [8] | |
B. pumilus | Coenobita spp. | In vitro study | Inhibition of the growth of bacteria isolated from the shell of hermit crab | Gallini et al. [66] | |
Bacillus subtilis |
S. paramamosain (5.2 g) |
105 cfu/g diet, 30 days | Immunity, disease resistance | Wu et al. [8] | |
B. subtilis E20 |
S. paramamosain (juvenile) |
108, 109, 1010 cfu/g diet | Growth performance, immunity, disease resistance | Yeh et al. [4] | |
Lactobacillus plantarum |
P. pelagicus (larvae) |
1.0 × 106, 5.0 × 106 and 1.0 × 107 cfu/mL culture water, 14 days | Survival rate, digestive enzyme activities, water quality, inhibition of pathogen growth | Talpur et al. [67] | |
L. plantarum 7–40 |
S. paramamosain (juvenile) |
109 cfu/g diet | Growth performance, immunity, disease resistance | Yeh et al. [4] | |
Enterococcus faecalis Y17 |
S. paramamosain (100±3 g) |
109 cfu/g diet, 6 weeks | Growth performance, serum enzyme activities, disease resistance | Yang et al. [42] | |
Pediococcus pentosaceus G11 |
S. paramamosain (100±3 g) |
109 cfu/g diet, 6 weeks | Growth performance, serum enzyme activities, disease resistance | Yang et al. [42] | |
Five strains of Alteromonadaceae (2 strains), Flavobacteriaceae (1), Aeromonadaceae (1), Alteromonadaceae (2) |
Scylla serrata (larvae) |
N/A | Survival rate, suppression of the necrosis | Dan and Hamasaki [68] | |
BreviB. brevis (Rica-1) |
S. paramamosain (larvae) |
15 mg/L culture water, 25 days | Survival rate, suppression of pathogen growth | Gunarto et al. [70] | |
A combination of B. subtilis E20 and L. plantarum 7–40 |
S. paramamosain (juvenile) |
109 cfu/g diet each of L. plantarum 7–40 and B. subtilis E20, 28 days | Growth performance, immunity, disease resistance | Yeh et al. [4] |
3.1. Mode of action
The supplementation of prebiotics has been shown to be beneficial for the increase of feed utilization and weight gain in crabs, which are influenced by the increased activities of relevant digestive enzymes [46,58]. Song, Beck [17] have proposed the mechanisms of action of prebiotics to the innate immune system by either stimulating the innate immune system directly or through the modulation of the growth of commensal microbiota. In the first manner, prebiotics is mediated through direct interactions with their receptors (PRRs), such as β-glucan receptors and dectin-1 receptors located in the host's cell surface, leading to the activation of signal transduction molecules (such as nuclear factor kappa B- NF-κB) and stimulation of immune cells [17]. Furthermore, some prebiotics (such as MOS) can interact with receptors on the cell surface by acting as receptor analogs for the components of pathogenic bacteria (such as Type-1 fimbriae) and thus preventing the harbor of pathogenic bacteria in the gut [16]. In the second manner, prebiotic modulate the growth of commensal microbiota, which remains unclear in crab species; however; in Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei), combined arabinoxylan-oligosaccharide and inulin significantly increased the richness and relative abundance of Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Bacteriovorax, and Lactobacillus, and reduced the abundance of Vibrio, Rhodococcus, and Photobacterium in the digestive tract of shrimp [22].
3.2. Application of prebiotics in crabs
MOS is glucomannoprotein-complexes derived from the cell wall of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) [55]. Inulin is a polydisperse carbohydrate consisting mainly of β(2→1) fructosyl-fructose links, which is not a natural fiber in the fish diet [16]. In aquaculture, the application of these prebiotics has received consideration, and the studies showed a remarkable enhancement in innate immune response and pathogen resistance [19,22]. In E. sinensis, Lu et al. [46] evaluated the effect of diets supplemented with a single MOS (3 g/kg, M), or its combination with either β-glucan (3 g/kg MOS+1.5 g/kg β-glucan, MB) or with inulin (3 g/kg MOS+10 g/kg inulin, MI) on the growth, immunity, and disease resistance of the crabs, and revealed the best effect by the combination of MOS with β-glucan or with inulin. The M, MB, and MI diets improved the weight gain and specific growth rate of the crabs, and the MB diet showed the highest growth and feed utilization of the crabs as compared with the others. The trypsin activity was higher in the gastrointestinal tract of crabs fed M, MB, and MI and the highest in the hepatopancreas of those fed MB. An increased antioxidant system-related enzyme activity was observed in M, MB, and MI, with the highest activities of alkaline phosphatase, acid phosphatase, lysozyme and PO in the gut and the respiratory burst in the MB. The MB diet stimulated the mRNA expression of immune-related genes (E. sinensis peritrophin-like- ES-PT, ES-Relish, E. sinensis lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor alpha factor- ES-LITAF, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase- p38MAPK, and Crustin) and enhanced the survival rate of crabs infected with Aeromonas hydrophila.
In an in vitro anaerobic fermentation study using gut contents of S. paramamosain, the two prebiotics (galactooligosaccharides (GOS) and resistant starch) have been selected to stimulate the high butyric acid production as compared with xylooligosaccharides, MOS, fructooligosaccharides, inulin, D-mannitol, D-sorbitol, L-sorbose, and xylitol [57]. Both GOS and resistant starch have shown to change the diversity, structure, and function of gut microbiota, as well as, enhance the SCFA production (especially butyrate). Bacterial diversity in the GOS group was lower than that in the resistant starch or control group, and the bacterial phylum Bacteroidetes is predominant in the GOS group and Tenericutes is in the resistant starch. The authors documented that GOS and resistant starch could be used as potential prebiotics in mud crab [57].
Therefore, prebiotic supplementation resulted in beneficial effects on the growth, immunity, and disease resistance of the crabs. Based on this fact, it is suggested to conduct more studies assessing the potential use of prebiotics in regulating both humoral and cellular innate immunity in the mucosal and systemic immune systems of crabs. The selection of prebiotics is necessary to provide the premise for more effective use of prebiotics in crab aquaculture. Furthermore, the application of molecular methods, such as 16 s rRNA sequencing, is needed in future prebiotic studies, which can evaluate the efficacy of prebiotics in selecting the growth of both uncultivable/cultivable aerobic and anaerobic microbial communities.
4. Probiotics
The term probiotic has its origins in Greek words meaning “for life” [59]. and was defined by FAO/World Health Organization (WHO) as “live microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” [60]. In aquatic animals, several studies have documented the roles of probiotics in improving growth performance, contributing nutrition and enzymes to the digestion of the host, enhancing the host's immune responses, and controlling diseases [[25], [26], [27], [28],[61], [62], [63]]. The effectiveness of probiotics has been studied in crab species (Table 1). The probiotics serve as growth promoters, immunostimulants, and prophylactic agents against pathogens in crabs, as well as, water quality controllers in the rearing water [4,8,42,[64], [65], [66], [67]]. Typical microorganisms used as probiotics in crabs are lactic acid bacteria, including Bacillus spp., Lactobacillus plantarum, Enterococcus faecalis, and Pediococcus pentosaceus. The safety and effectiveness in use are one of the most important factors determining the availability of probiotics, which is also essential for consideration in crab farming. Recently, the bacterial strains (belonging to the families Alteromonadaceae (2 strains), Flavobacteriaceae (1 strain), Aeromonadaceae (1 strain), and Alteromonadaceae (2 strains)) were isolated from the rearing water of S. serrata larval and surrounding coastal water and used for characterizing their probiotic properties, in vitro [68]. The inhibitory effect of these strains on the growth of the NY strain (belonging to Flavobacteriaceae), the main pathogen causing tissue necrosis and high mortality of S. serrata larvae, has been noted [68]. In an in vivo study, probiotic effects on suppressing necrosis and enhancing the survival of S. serrata larvae were observed up to the Z4 stage and disappeared after the Z5 stage [68]. The results found that these probiotic bacteria are not able to proliferate in the crab larval rearing water, and thus, the supplementation of nutrients that are required for probiotic proliferation and extracellular production are needed for further consideration. Furthermore, the adhesion of probiotics in the gastrointestinal tract of the host or the maintenance of their existence in the microbial population in rearing water is crucially important for study the probiotic properties. The probiotics generally interact with host cells for training, eliciting, or modulating the host immune system, and their adhesion ability is needed to provide substantial resident time for probiotics in order to exhibit their functions in host health [69]. However, this issue is still limited in the application of probiotics in crab farming, which merits further studies.
Previous studies have shown that probiotics can be supplied directly through the feed to introduce live cells to the gut of host animals helping to improve digestive function, growth, or immune system responses [8,42] or applied directly to culture systems to improve water quality and the survival of cultured animals [65,67,70]. Feeding period is an important factor continuously keeping the presence of probiotics in the gastrointestinal tract of the animals. Probiotics used in aquatic animals, in general, are originated from terrestrial mammals, which affects the resident time in the gut of fish species [71]. Hai [72] has noted that the supplied probiotics are disappeared in the digestive tract for periods beyond 1–3 weeks. The previous studies showed the different feeding durations in crabs, which are based on the application methods; for example, in the case of the supplementation via the feed, the duration was arranged from 30 to 42 days, while in the direct use to the culture water, it was from 8 to 45 days. However, the basis for the time duration is not clear.
Administration modes are important in helping to effectively utilize the functions of probiotics. Studies have investigated the single-use of probiotic strains and shown positive effects of them on the hosts. In the S. paramamosain juvenile, B. subtilis DCU can increase immune responses and disease resistance against V. parahaemolyticus [8]. Furthermore, improved immune response and resistance to pathogens in S. paramamosain was reported after feeding with either B. subtilis E20 or L. plantarum 7–40 [4]. The combination of multispecies of probiotics is also used in crab culture. A mixture of Bacillus spp. significantly increased the survivals of the S. paramamosain larvae as compared with the controls [64]. However, Yeh et al. [4] showed that S. paramamosain fed a mixture of B. subtilis E20 and L. plantarum 7–40 showed significantly higher mortality after challenge with V. parahaemolyticus when compared with groups that received either B. subtilis E20 or L. plantarum 7–40. The reason for this is due to the inhibition of L. plantarum 7–40 on the growth of B. subtilis E20, causing the decrease of immunity and disease resistance of mud crab [4]. The study on the combined use of multistrain or multispecies of probiotics in crabs remains limited and requires further investigations.
Regarding the use of probiotics, the dosage used is important, which impacts the physiological responses of the hosts [55]. Different dosages and probiotic species may bring variable results to their hosts. For example, in blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus), Bacillus licheniformis, with a dose of 6.9 mL/kg feed, compared to the lower, can promote the highest molting percentage (89%) and 3.3 mL/kg feed or higher can inhibit the growth of Vibrio sp. in the rearing tanks [65]. Furthermore, L. plantarum at 5.0 × 106 cfu/mL can increase the survival rate, enzyme activity of larvae of blue swimming crab, as well as improve the water quality [67]. However, the high concentration of L. plantarum (1.0 × 107 cfu/mL) may not be suitable for the survival of the blue swimming crab larvae, which did not increase the survival of larvae [67]. Therefore, the administration modes and dosages are crucially important in crabs and need to be considered in further studies.
4.1. Mode of action
Application of probiotics offers promise to enhance the growth of crab species, which are by the improvement of immune system, suppression of the growth of pathogens, and promotion of digestion [65]. Using probiotics can also increase the survival of the host, which may be due to their effects on the control of water quality and maintaining of a high levels of dissolved oxygen in the culture system [65]. Furthermore, probiotic bacteria can stimulate the activities of PO, lysozyme, SOD, and phagocytosis [4,42], thereby improving the immune functions in crabs, consequently enhancing the disease resistance to infectious pathogens.
4.2. Application of probiotics in crabs
4.2.1. Bacillus spp
A mixture of Bacillus spp. (PondPlus®, Novozymes®) purchased commercially improved the survival rates of the mud crab (S. paramamosain) larvae and the number of green Vibrios [64]. The results revealed that the bacterial concentrations of 1 × 104 and 2 × 104 cfu/mL (0.50 and 1.00 g/50 L, respectively) promote the larval survival rate and inhibit the growth of green Vibrio bacteria [64].
4.2.2. Bacillus licheniformis
In blue swimming crab (P. pelagicus) crablets, B. licheniformis (with 107 cfu/mL) at 0.0, 1.5, 3.0 and 6.0 mL/kg diet were used to feed the crab for 45 days to determine the optimal dose of probiotics on the survival, molting, and growth performance of the crablets and their ability to inhibit the growth of Vibrio sp. [65]. The results showed that the probiotic dose is positively correlated with the growth performance (through length gain and weight gain) and molting percentage, as well as, is negatively correlated with the food conversion ratio of blue swimming crablets [65]. The dose of 3.3 mL/kg feed or higher can inhibit the growth of Vibrio sp., and the dose of 6.9 mL/kg feed promote the highest molting percentage (of 89%) [65]. However, in an in vitro study, Gallini et al. [66] revealed that B. licheniformisis cannot inhibit the growth of bacteria isolated from the shell of hermit crab (Coenobita spp.) [66].
4.2.3. Bacillus pumilus
B. pumilus is a Gram-positive, aerobic, and rod-shaped spore-forming bacterium [73]. In an early study, Wu et al. [8] conducted a 30-day feeding trial to determine the beneficial effects of B. pumilus BP (105 cfu/g) on juvenile mud crab (S. paramamosain), and revealed the significant expression of immune-related genes (CAT, proPO, and SOD) and the activities of respiratory burst, as well as final survival rate of crabs after challenge with V. parahaemolyticus, which was 76.67%, compared with 54.88% in the control crabs. Furthermore, in hermit crab (Coenobita spp.), B. pumilus is able to inhibit the growth of Bacillus spp., Sphingomonas paucimobilis, and Acinetobacter lwoffii isolated from the shell of the crabs [66].
4.2.4. Bacillus subtilis
B. subtilis is a Gram-positive bacterium, which has been identified in the intestine of several finfish species and reported to be beneficial in aquaculture [61,74]. In crustaceans, a dietary B. subtilis DCU at 105 cfu/g diet was fed to juvenile mud crabs (S. paramamosain) for 30 days [8]. There was an increased expression of immune-related genes (CAT, proPO, and SOD), activities of respiratory burst, and disease resistance against V. parahaemolyticus, showing a higher final survival rate (78.33%) in crabs treated with DCU when compared with those in controls (54.88%) [8].
4.2.5. Lactobacillus plantarum
In a study with blue swimming crab (P. pelagicus) larvae, L. plantarum (1.0 × 106, 5.0 × 106 and 1.0 × 107 cfu/mL) were added daily for 14 days and increased the survival rate of the crab larvae, protease and amylase activities, and water quality; whereas the total bacteria and Vibrio counts were decreased by L. plantarum administration [67]. This indicates the probiotic role of the bacteria in improving health status of their hosts and modulating the water microbiota.
4.2.6. Enterococcus faecalis
Enterococcus faecalis Y17, isolated from the intestine of mud crab (S. paramamosain), is Gram-positive, globular shaped, and facultatively anaerobic, showing 0.5–1.0 μm in diameter, occurring in pairs or short chains were used as a probiotic bacterium to evaluate the potential benefits in the growth performance and disease resistance of mud crab [42]. The results revealed the significant enhancement of growth (viz., weight gain and specific growth rate), serum enzyme activities (viz., PO, lysozyme, and SOD), and the resistance against V. parahaemolyticus (survival rate was 66.67% as compared with 53.33% in the control group) in the crabs fed a diet supplemented with 109 cfu/g diet of Y17 for 6 weeks [42].
4.2.7. Pediococcus pentosaceus
Dietary Pediococcus pentosaceus G11, isolated from the intestine of mud crab (S. paramamosain), at 109 cfu/g diet was fed to mud crab for 6 weeks [42]. A significant increase in the weight gain, specific growth rate, serum enzyme activities (viz., PO, lysozyme, and SOD), relative mRNA expression of CAT, LYS, proPO, and SOD, and resistance against V. parahaemolyticus was observed in mud crab fed by probiotics.
4.3. Other probiotics
Dan and Hamasaki [68] investigated the probiotic potential of five bacterial strains (Alteromonadaceae: 2 strains; Flavobacteriaceae: 1 strain; Aeromonadaceae: 1 strain; and Alteromonadaceae: 2 strains) in S. serrata larvae. The results showed that the probiotics can suppress the necrosis and improve the survival rate of the larvae until the Z4 stage, and show inefficient effects after the Z5 stage [68].
The commercial probiotic product (Rica-1) containing Gram-positive BreviBacillus brevis has been previously reported to inhibit the growth of Vibrio spp. in Artemia [70]. In mud crab (S. paramamosain) larvae, the effectiveness of probiotic (Rica-1), antibiotics (erythromycin), and anti-bacterial nitrofuran chemotherapy (elbayou) (with a dose of 15 mg/L rearing water each) in the rearing tanks of mud crab larvae was investigated in detail [70]. The results showed that the application of Rica-1 probiotic is less effective in the crablet production and suppression of Vibrio harveyi infecting the megalopa when compared to the use of erythromycin and elbayou. No crablet was yielded in the rearing tank on the 20th day of rearing and the megalopa was died by the infection of V. harveyii in the Rica-1 probiotic-added rearing tank. The reason for this may be due to the thinning process between tanks to minimize cannibalism (from the zoea-5 to megalopa period) causing stress conditions of the larvae [70].
4.4. A combination of bacillus subtilis and lactobacillus plantarum
Dietary supplementation of either individual or combined species of B. subtilis E20 and L. plantarum 7–40 was used to feed to the mud crab (S. paramamosian) for 28 days [4]. The results revealed that there were no significant differences in growth, total hemocyte counts, respiratory bursts, SOD, and glutathione peroxidase in both individual or mixed probiotic-fed groups. The PO activity, phagocytic activity, and disease resistance were significantly higher in B. subtilis E20 compared with the control and the probiotic-mixed diet, while the mortality of crabs was significantly lower in B. subtilis E20 vs. L. plantarum 7–40. The optimal concentration of B. subtilis E20 (109–10 cfu/kg diet) showed a better immune response of PO and phagocytic activity, and disease resistance in mud crab [4].
5. Conclusions
Prebiotics and probiotics show promising potential for application in crab culture as feed additives. The studies have demonstrated the important role of prebiotics and probiotics in promoting growth, stimulating immune responses, and enhancing disease resistance in crab species. Prebiotics or probiotics can be used singly or in combination with other components. Probiotics are diverse and can be used directly to the feed to confer health benefits or directly to the culture systems to improve water quality and reduce the growth of pathogenic bacteria living in the culture system. The modes of action of prebiotics and probiotics are possible through the stimulation of host humoral and cellular innate immunity.
Principally, probiotic candidates are directly isolated and supplied to this host, but recently, several commercial probiotics (i.e., Rica-1) have been developed and used. The sources and quality of these products should be standardized and controlled carefully. Most of the probiotics used in crabs are lactic acid bacteria (Table 1), the diversity of probiotic species is needed to investigate, facilitating assessing the most suitable one used in crab culture. Furthermore, lactic acid bacteria can produce bacteriocins serving as alternatives to chemicals and antibiotics with antimicrobial activities against invading pathogens [30]. However, there is still limited information available about this topic in crabs. Interestingly, the effects of probiotics may be direct by themselves or indirect by their metabolites to their hosts. Also, the consumption of prebiotics or probiotics may lead to changes in the gut microbiota and the microbiota-derived products, indirectly affecting the digestibility and immune system. These issues have not been studied in the case of crabs, which merits further investigations.
Immunostimulation is the most common mode of action for using prebiotics and probiotics in crabs, relating to the stimulation of host cellular and humoral innate immunity. Interestingly, both probiotics and prebiotics can be combined and supplied to the diet as the form of synergism, identified as synbiotics, to improve growth performance, modulate intestinal microflora, reduce the mortality, enhance the immune responses, and increase disease resistance [75,76]. Synbiotics are some colonic foods with interesting nutritional properties and are used as health-enhancing functional ingredients [77]. These ingredients not only provide beneficial bacterial populations but also promote the proliferation of specific gut microbial strains [78]. The application of synbiotics may confer greater benefits than the use of individual prebiotics or probiotics. Until now, synbiotics have been used in crustaceans, including shrimps [79]; however, there was no study focusing on the use of synbiotics in crab species. Therefore, the immunostimulant effects of synbiotics, compared with prebiotics and probiotics, on the health performance of crabs should be further studied.
The studies basing on the ‘omics’ studies (transcriptomic, metabolomic, and proteomic analyses) to provide a better understanding of interactions between prebiotics/probiotics and their host are crucially essential. Moreover, gnotobiotic approaches should be applied in evaluating the effect of prebiotics/probiotics on the gut epithelium and immune system of carbs. Furthermore, the ability to colonize the intestinal tract or other epithelial surfaces is an important property of a probiotic [80]. The duration of colonization of probiotics in the gastrointestinal tract of their host is important in order to determine the interval time of application, which relates to the cost-benefit analysis in the culture period. However, the issue remains limited in crabs, which merits further investigations. Also, the consideration of probiotic species, optimal dosage, and application methods are necessary for evaluation in the use of probiotics. Additionally, probiotics may be prepared to be paraprobiotics (non-viable microbial cells or crude cell extracts) and applied in the crab aquaculture to stimulate the host's immune response [81,82]. This is of interest to the potential application of both probiotics and paraprobiotics in crabs.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (41876152, 31850410487, 31802341), STU Scientific Research Foundation for Talents (NTF21027), Guangdong provincial project of Science and Technology (2017B020204003), and Guangdong provincial Special Fund for Modern Agriculture Industry Technology Innovation Teams (2019KJ141).
References
- 1.Frey R.W., Curran H.A., Pemberton S.G. Tracemaking activities of crabs and their environmental significance: the Ichnogenus Psilonichnus. J. Paleontol. 1984;58(2):333–350. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Waiho K., Fazhan H., Quinitio E.T., Baylon J.C., Fujaya Y., Azmie G., Wu Q., Shi X., Ikhwanuddin M., Ma H. Larval rearing of mud crab (Scylla): what lies ahead. Aquaculture. 2018;493:37–50. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.04.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Syafaat M.N., Azra M.N., Waiho K., Fazhan H., Abol-Munafi A.B., Ishak S.D., Syahnon M., Ghazali A., Ma H., Ikhwanuddin M. A review of the nursery culture of mud crabs, genus Scylla: current progress and future directions. Animals. 2021;11(7):2034. doi: 10.3390/ani11072034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yeh S.P., Chiu C.H., Shiu Y.L., Huang Z.L., Liu C.H. Effects of diets supplemented with either individual or combined probiotics, Bacillus subtilis E20 and Lactobacillus plantarum 7-40, on the immune response and disease resistance of the mud crab, Scylla paramamosain (Estampador) Aquac. Res. 2014;45(7):1164–1175. doi: 10.1111/are.12061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.N. Nandi, M.D. Roy, Culturable crabs of coastal West Bengal: an overview JAMB, 8 (1) (2019), pp. 1–5, 10.15406/jamb.2019.08.00233.
- 6.Tran N.T., Kong T., Zhang M., Li S. Pattern recognition receptors and their roles on the innate immune system of mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2020;102 doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2019.103469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Weng S., Guo Z., Sun J., Chan S., He J. A reovirus disease in cultured mud crab, Scylla serrata, in southern China. J. Fish Dis. 2007;30(3):133–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2007.00794.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wu H.J., Sun L.B., Li C.B., Li Z.Z., Zhang Z., Wen X.B., Hu Z., Zhang Y.L., Li S.K. Enhancement of the immune response and protection against Vibrio parahaemolyticus by indigenous probiotic Bacillus strains in mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014;41(2):156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2014.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li S., Sun L., Wu H., Hu Z., Liu W., Li Y., Wen X. The intestinal microbial diversity in mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) as determined by PCR-DGGE and clone library analysis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012;113(6):1341–1351. doi: 10.1111/jam.12008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li Y.Y., Xia X.A., Wu Q.Y., Liu W.H., Lin Y.S. Infection with Hematodinium sp. in mud crabs Scylla serrata cultured in low salinity water in southern China. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2008;82(2):145–150. doi: 10.3354/dao01988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xie C., Chen Y., Sun W., Ding J., Zhou L., Wang S., Wang S., Zhang Y., Zhu D., Wen X. Transcriptome and expression profiling analysis of the hemocytes reveals a large number of immune-related genes in mud crab Scylla paramamosain during Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Owens L., Liessmann L., Fauce K., Nyguyen T., Zeng C. Intranuclear bacilliform virus and hepatopancreatic parvovirus (PmergDNV) in the mud crab Scylla serrata (Forskal) of Australia. Aquaculture. 2010;310:47–51. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.10.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Somboonna N., Mangkalanan S., Udompetcharaporn A., Krittanai C., Sritunyalucksana K., Flegel T.W. Mud crab susceptibility to disease from white spot syndrome virus is species-dependent. BMC Res. Notes. 2010;3(1):315. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pérez-Sánchez T., Mora-Sánchez B., Balcázar J.L. Biological approaches for disease control in aquaculture: advantages, limitations and challenges. Trends Microbiol. 2018;26(11):896–903. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ringø E. Probiotics in shellfish aquaculture. Aquac. Fish. 2020;5(1):1–27. doi: 10.1016/j.aaf.2019.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ringø E., Zhou Z., Vecino J., Wadsworth S., Romero J., Krogdahl Å., Olsen R., Dimitroglou A., Foey A., Davies S. Effect of dietary components on the gut microbiota of aquatic animals. A never-ending story? Aquac. Nutr. 2016;22(2):219–282. doi: 10.1111/anu.12346. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Song S.K., Beck B.R., Kim D., Park J., Kim J., Kim H.D., Ringø E. Prebiotics as immunostimulants in aquaculture: a review. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014;40(1):40–48. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2014.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sanders M.E., Merenstein D.J., Reid G., Gibson G.R., Rastall R.A. Probiotics and prebiotics in intestinal health and disease: from biology to the clinic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019;16(10):605–616. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0173-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Li Y., Liu H., Dai X., Li J., Ding F. Effects of dietary inulin and mannan oligosaccharide on immune related genes expression and disease resistance of Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018;76:78–92. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2018.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li Z., Tran N.T., Ji P., Sun Z., Wen X., Li S. Effects of prebiotic mixtures on growth performance, intestinal microbiota and immune response in juvenile chu's croaker, Nibea coibor. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019;89:564–573. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sado R.Y., Bicudo L.J.A., Cyrino J.E.P. Growth and intestinal morphology of juvenile pacu Piaractus mesopotamicus (Holmberg 1887) fed dietary prebiotics (mannanoligosaccharides-MOS) An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 2014;86(3):1517–1524. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201420130088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li Y., Yuan W., Zhang Y., Liu H., Dai X. Single or combined effects of dietary arabinoxylan-oligosaccharide and inulin on growth performance, gut microbiota, and immune response in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. JOL. 2021;39(2):741–754. doi: 10.1007/s00343-020-9083-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mo W.Y., Cheng Z., Choi W.M., Lun C.H.I., Man Y.B., Wong J.T.F., Chen X.W., Lau S.C.K., Wong M.H. Use of food waste as fish feeds: effects of prebiotic fibers (inulin and mannanoligosaccharide) on growth and non-specific immunity of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2015;22(22):17663–17671. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4971-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shoaei R., Akrami R., Ghobadi S., Mansour M.R. Effect of dietary of prebiotic mannan oligosaccharide and β-1,3 glucan on growth performance, survival, body composition and serum lysozyme activity in Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fingerling. J. Mar. Biol. 2015;7(2):45–56. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Adel M., Yeganeh S., Dawood M., Safari R., Radhakrishnan S. Effects of Pediococcus pentosaceus supplementation on growth performance, intestinal microflora and disease resistance of white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquac. Nutr. 2017;23(6):1401–1409. doi: 10.1111/anu.12515. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.L. Poolsawat, X. Li, M. He, D. Ji, X. Leng, Clostridium butyricum as probiotic for promoting growth performance, feed utilization, gut health and microbiota community of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus × O. aureus), 26 (3) (2020), pp. 657–670, https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.13025.
- 27.Duan Y., Zhang Y., Dong H., Wang Y., Zheng X., Zhang J. Effect of dietary Clostridium butyricum on growth, intestine health status and resistance to ammonia stress in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2017;65:25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2017.03.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Guo X., Chen D.D., Peng K.S., Cui Z.W., Zhang X.J., Li S., Zhang Y.A. Identification and characterization of Bacillus subtilis from grass carp (Ctenopharynodon idellus) for use as probiotic additives in aquatic feed. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016;52:74–84. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2016.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ringø E., Doan H.V., Lee S., Song S.K. Lactic acid bacteria in shellfish: possibilities and challenges. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 2020;28(2):139–169. doi: 10.1080/23308249.2019.1683151. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ringø E., Hoseinifar S.H., Ghosh K., Doan H.V., Beck B.R., Song S.K. Lactic acid bacteria in finfish-An update. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9(1818) doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dawood M.A.O., Koshio S., Abdel-Daim M.M., Van Doan H. Probiotic application for sustainable aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 2019;11(3):907–924. doi: 10.1111/raq.12272. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ayisi C.L., Apraku A., Afriyie G. A review of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in crab: present research, problems, and future perspective. J. Shellfish Res. 2017;36(3):799–806. doi: 10.2983/035.036.0329. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Stokes B.A., Yadav S., Shokal U., Smith L.C., Eleftherianos I. Bacterial and fungal pattern recognition receptors in homologous innate signaling pathways of insects and mammals. Front. Microbiol. 2015;6(19) doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Holmblad T., Söderhäll K. Cell adhesion molecules and antioxidative enzymes in a crustacean, possible role in immunity. Aquaculture. 1999;172(1):111–123. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00446-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhang X., Tang X., Tran N.T., Huang Y., Gong Y., Zhang Y., Zheng H., Ma H., Li S. Innate immune responses and metabolic alterations of mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) in response to Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019;87:166–177. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vazquez L., Alpuche J., Maldonado G., Agundis C., Pereyra-Morales A., Zenteno E. Immunity mechanisms in crustaceans. Innate Immun. 2009;15(3):179–188. doi: 10.1177/1753425909102876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Clare A.S., Lumb G. Identification of haemocytes and their role in clotting in the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus. Mar. Biol. 1994;118(4):601–610. doi: 10.1007/BF00347507. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mangkalanan S., Sanguanrat P., Utairangsri T., Sritunyalucksana K., Krittanai C. Characterization of the circulating hemocytes in mud crab (Scylla olivacea) revealed phenoloxidase activity. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2014;44(1):116–123. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2013.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhou Y.L., Gu W.B., Tu D.D., Zhu Q.H., Zhou Z.K., Chen Y.Y., Shu M.A. Hemocytes of the mud crab Scylla paramamosain: cytometric, morphological characterization and involvement in immune responses. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018;72:459–469. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2017.10.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jiravanichpaisal P., Lee B.L., Söderhäll K. Cell-mediated immunity in arthropods: hematopoiesis, coagulation, melanization and opsonization. Immunobiology. 2006;211(4):213–236. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2005.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Johansson M.W., Keyser P., Sritunyalucksana K., Söderhäll K. Crustacean haemocytes and haematopoiesis. Aquaculture. 2000;191(1–3):45–52. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00418-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yang Q., Lü Y., Zhang M., Gong Y., Li Z., Tran N.T., He Y., Zhu C., Lu Y., Zhang Y. Lactic acid bacteria, Enterococcus faecalis Y17 and Pediococcus pentosaceus G11, improved growth performance, and immunity of mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019;93:135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.07.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Koiwai K., Koyama T., Tsuda S., Toyoda A., Kikuchi K., Suzuki H., Kawano R. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis reveals penaeid shrimp hemocyte subpopulations and cell differentiation process. Elife. 2021;10:e66954. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kulkarni A., Krishnan S., Anand D., Kokkattunivarthil Uthaman S., Otta S.K., Karunasagar I., Kooloth Valappil R. Immune responses and immunoprotection in crustaceans with special reference to shrimp. Rev. Aquac. 2021;13(1):431–459. doi: 10.1111/raq.12482. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sarathi M., Ahmed V.P.I., Venkatesan C., Balasubramanian G., Prabavathy J., Hameed A.S.S. Comparative study on immune response of Fenneropenaeus indicus to Vibrio alginolyticus and white spot syndrome virus. Aquaculture. 2007;271(1):8–20. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.07.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lu J., Bu X., Xiao S., Lin Z., Wang X., Jia Y., Wang X., Qin J.G., Chen L. Effect of single and combined immunostimulants on growth, anti-oxidation activity, non-specific immunity and resistance to Aeromonas hydrophila in Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019;93:732–742. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Liu S., Zheng S.C., Li Y.L., Li J., Liu H.P. Hemocyte-mediated phagocytosis in crustaceans. Front. Immunol. 2020;11(268) doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Freeman S.A., Grinstein S. Phagocytosis: receptors, signal integration, and the cytoskeleton. Immunol. Rev. 2014;262(1):193–215. doi: 10.1111/imr.12212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chen F., Wang K. Characterization of the innate immunity in the mud crab Scylla paramamosain. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019;93:436–448. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.07.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yang Y., Chen F., Chen H.Y., Peng H., Hao H., Wang K.J. A novel antimicrobial peptide Scyreprocin from mud crab Scylla paramamosain showing potent antifungal and anti-biofilm activity. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11(1589) doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Yusof W.R.W., Badruddin Ahmad F., Swamy M. A brief review on the antioxidants and antimicrobial peptides revealed in mud crabs from the genus of Scylla. J. Mar. Biol. 2017;2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/1850928. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bartlett T.C., Cuthbertson B.J., Shepard E.F., Chapman R.W., Gross P.S., Warr G.W. Crustins, homologues of an 11.5-kDa antibacterial peptide, from two species of penaeid shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei and Litopenaeus setiferus. Mar. Biotechnol. 2002;4(3):278–293. doi: 10.1007/s10126-002-0020-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cummings J., Macfarlane G., Englyst H. Prebiotic digestion and fermentation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001;73(2 Suppl):415S–420S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/73.2.415s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gibson G.R. Fibre and effects on probiotics (the prebiotic concept) Clin. Nutr. Suppl. 2004;1(2):25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.09.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Merrifield D.L., Dimitroglou A., Foey A., Davies S.J., Baker R.T.M., Bøgwald J., Castex M., Ringø E. The current status and future focus of probiotic and prebiotic applications for salmonids. Aquaculture. 2010;302(1):1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.02.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Tran N.T., Li Z., Wang S., Zheng H., Aweya J.J., Wen X., Li S. Progress and perspectives of short-chain fatty acids in aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 2020;12(1):283–298. doi: 10.1111/raq.12317. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Tran N.T., Tang Y., Li Z., Zhang M., Wen X., Ma H., Li S. Galactooligosaccharides and resistant starch altered microbiota and short-chain fatty acids in an in vitro fermentation study using gut contents of mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:1352. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mirzapour-Rezaee S., Farhangi M., Rafiee G. Combined effects of dietary mannan-and fructo-oligosaccharide on growth indices, body composition, intestinal bacterial flora and digestive enzymes activity of regal peacock (Aulonocara stuartgranti) Aquac. Nutr. 2017;23(3):629–636. doi: 10.1111/anu.12430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gismondo M.R., Drago L., Lombardi A. Review of probiotics available to modify gastrointestinal flora. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 1999;12(4):287–292. doi: 10.1016/S0924-8579(99)00050-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.FAO/WHO, Probiotics in food: health and nutritional properties and guidelines for evaluation, ed., FAO, Rome, 2006.
- 61.Liu C.H., Chiu C.H., Wang S.W., Cheng W. Dietary administration of the probiotic, Bacillus subtilis E20, enhances the growth, innate immune responses, and disease resistance of the grouper, Epinephelus coioides. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2012;33(4):699–706. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2012.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Deeseenthum S., Leelavatcharamas V., Brookes J. Effect of feeding Bacillus sp. as probiotic bacteria on growth of giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii de Man) Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2007;10(9):1481–1485. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2007.1481.1485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wu Z.X., Feng X., Xie L.L., Peng X.Y., Yuan J., Chen X.X. Effect of probiotic Bacillus subtilis Ch9 for grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella (Valenciennes, 1844), on growth performance, digestive enzyme activities and intestinal microflora. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2012;28(5):721–727. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2012.01968.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Talib A., Onn K.K., Chowdury M.A., Din W.M.W., Yahya K. The beneficial effects of multispecies Bacillus as probiotics in enhancing culture performance for mud crab Scylla paramamosain larval culture. Aquac. Int. 2017;25(2):849–866. doi: 10.1007/s10499-016-0070-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Boonyapakdee A., Bhujel R. Determining the dose of dietary probiotic (Bacillus licheniformis) for the nursing of blue swimming crablets (Portunus pelagicus, L., 1758) Turkish J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2020;20:889–899. doi: 10.4194/1303-2712-v20_12_05. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Gallini S.H., Cole S.D., DiGeronimo P.M. In vitro inhibition of shell flora by a commercial probiotic marketed for use in captive hermit crabs (Coenobita spp.) J. Exot. Pet. Med. 2019;31:91–94. doi: 10.1053/j.jepm.2019.07.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Talpur A.D., Ikhwanuddin M., Abdullah M.D.D., Bolong A.M.A. Indigenous Lactobacillus plantarum as probiotic for larviculture of blue swimming crab, Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758): effects on survival, digestive enzyme activities and water quality. Aquaculture. 2013;416-417:173–178. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.09.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Dan S., Hamasaki K. Evaluation of the effects of probiotics in controlling bacterial necrosis symptoms in larvae of the mud crab Scylla serrata during mass seed production. Aquac. Int. 2015;23(1):277–296. doi: 10.1007/s10499-014-9815-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Buntin N., de Vos W.M., Hongpattarakere T. Variation of mucin adhesion, cell surface characteristics, and molecular mechanisms among Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from different habitats. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017;101(20):7663–7674. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8482-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Gunarto G., Tampangalo B.R., Muliani M. The application of erythromycin, elbayou, and Rica-1 probiotic in the rearing of Scylla paramamosain mud crab larvae development into the crablet stage. Thalass. Int. J. Mar. Sci. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s41208-021-00327-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wanka K.M., Damerau T., Costas B., Krueger A., Schulz C., Wuertz S. Isolation and characterization of native probiotics for fish farming. BMC Microbiol. 2018;18(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1260-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hai N.V. The use of probiotics in aquaculture. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015;119(4):917–935. doi: 10.1111/jam.12886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hill J.E., Baiano J.C.F., Barnes A.C. Isolation of a novel strain of Bacillus pumilus from penaeid shrimp that is inhibitory against marine pathogens. J. Fish Dis. 2009;32(12):1007–1016. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2009.01084.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Soltani M., Ghosh K., Hoseinifar S.H., Kumar V., Lymbery A.J., Roy S., Ringø E. Genus Bacillus, promising probiotics in aquaculture: aquatic animal origin, bio-active components, bioremediation and efficacy in fish and shellfish. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 2019;27(3):331–379. doi: 10.1080/23308249.2019.1597010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Yao W., Li X., Zhang C., Wang J., Cai Y., Leng X. Effects of dietary synbiotics supplementation methods on growth, intestinal health, non-specific immunity and disease resistance of Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2021;112:46–55. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2021.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Huynh T.G., Cheng A.C., Chi C.C., Chiu K.H., Liu C.H. A synbiotic improves the immunity of white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei: metabolomic analysis reveal compelling evidence. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018;79:284–293. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2018.05.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Gibson G.R., Roberfroid M.B. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. J. Nutr. 1995;125(6):1401–1412. doi: 10.1093/jn/125.6.1401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Gourbeyre P., Denery S., Bodinier M. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics: impact on the gut immune system and allergic reactions. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2011;89(5):685–695. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1109753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Butt U.D., Lin N., Akhter N., Siddiqui T., Li S., Wu B. Overview of the latest developments in the role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in shrimp aquaculture. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2021;114:263–281. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2021.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Pérez-Sánchez T., Ruiz-Zarzuela I., de Blas I., Balcázar J.L. Probiotics in aquaculture: a current assessment. Rev. Aquac. 2014;6(3):133–146. doi: 10.1111/raq.12033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Choudhury T.G., Kamilya D. Paraprobiotics: an aquaculture perspective. Rev. Aquac. 2019;11(4):1258–1270. doi: 10.1111/raq.12290. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Tran N.T., Yang W., Nguyen X.T., Zhang M., Ma H., Zheng H., Zhang Y., Chan K.G., Li S. Application of heat-killed probiotics in aquaculture. Aquaculture. 2022;548 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737700. [DOI] [Google Scholar]