Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Mater Res A. 2018 Feb 19;106(6):1535–1542. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36349

Nitric oxide-releasing antibacterial albumin plastic for biomedical applications

Alexander Jones 1, Jitendra Pant 2, Eliza Lee 1, Marcus J Goudie 2, Alexey Gruzd 1, Joel Mansfield 2, Abhyuday Mandal 3, Suraj Sharma 1, Hitesh Handa 2
PMCID: PMC9680931  NIHMSID: NIHMS1851042  PMID: 29377589

Abstract

Designing innovative materials for biomedical applications is desired to prevent surface fouling and risk of associated infections arising in the surgical care patient. In the present study, albumin plastic was fabricated and nitric oxide (NO) donor, S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP), was incorporated through a solvent swelling process. The albumin-SNAP plastic was evaluated in terms of mechanical and thermal properties, and bacterial adhesion to the plastic surface. Thermal and viscoelastic analyses showed no significant difference between albumin-SNAP plastics and pure, water-plasticized albumin samples. Bacteria adhesion tests revealed that albumin-SNAP plastic can significantly reduce the surface-bound viable gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus and gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacterial cells by 98.7 and 98.5%, respectively, when compared with the traditional polyvinyl chloride medical grade tubing material. The results from this study demonstrate NO-releasing albumin plastic’s potential as a material for biomedical device applications.

Keywords: albumin plastic, S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine, nitric oxide, device-associated infections

INTRODUCTION

Biomedical devices such as catheters, wound dressings, and in vivo sensors are frequently used in a hospital setting as a part of common medical practices. While their use is inevitable in medical practices, they can also be a potential cause of nosocomial or hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) because they introduce a route of bacterial infection through contact with blood, fluids, and tissues. Between the years of 1990 and 2002, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated ~1.7 million HAIs occurred per year in the United States, contributing to 99,000 death.1 Of the 150 million intravascular devices used annually, 200,000–400,000 result in nosocomial bloodstream infections each year in the U.S alone.2 Not surprisingly, the occurrence of nosocomial infections proportionally increases the time of hospitalization and healthcare cost. In fact, up to $11 billion is spent every year for treatment of HAIs in the United States, while hospital treatment time is increased fourfold as compared to hospitalization without infection.1,3 Preventing nosocomial infection is necessary not only to reduce the suffering of the patient but also to cut down huge medical costs.

Traditional polymers, such as polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinylchloride (PVC), and polyethylene terephthalate, used for biomedical devices lack the physical and chemical properties that could prevent bacterial growth.46 Colonization of bacteria over the polymer surface can lead to matrix deposition and biofilm formation, which can ultimately lead to infection. Biofilms are bacteria’s defense mechanism that guards them against being scoured or washed away; they render bacteria ineffective to the application of toxins, detergents, and antimicrobial agents.79

Since common petroleum-based plastics are susceptible to biofilm formation, alternative materials should be examined for their use in medical applications. In this regard, protein-based plastics have been investigated as promising alternative materials for implant fabrication.1012 Albumin protein from the hen’s egg white contains the enzyme lysozyme, which is of particular interest in medical devices because of its inherent antibacterial nature.13 With the incorporation of plasticizers, such as water and glycerol, albumin protein plastic has the potential to be utilized in medical applications.14,15 When exposed to bacteria (Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis), albumin-based plastics reduced growth on their surface.16 Additives, such as nitric oxide (NO) donors, could be used in tandem with the albumin to enhance its potential effectiveness in medical applications.

Sustained release of NO from an exogenous NO donor may offer a safer but effective method for preventing microbial adhesion on biomedical device surfaces.17 NO is a cellular signaling molecule naturally secreted by many cells within the human body, including vascular endothelial cells and macrophages. NO plays a crucial role in many physiological and pathological processes, including platelet activation and adhesion, vasodilation, wound healing, and inflammation.1721 Because NO is a natural antimicrobial agent, it has been incorporated into different medical grade polymers to not only improve the hemocompatibility but also prevent infection in blood-contacting devices such as sensors, catheters, vascular grafts, extracorporeal circuits and in medical device coatings.1720,2228 Moreover, NO releasing polymers have not been reported to cause any hemocompatibility, biocompatibility, or long-term storage stability issues.17,21,25

In future, researchers could take polymers incorporated with a NO donor a step further by seeking to improve the antimicrobial activity of plastics. Albumin protein plastics, given their antibacterial properties, provide a promising platform to produce biomaterials that can resist bacterial adhesion and protein adsorption. Combining albumin plastics with an NO donor such as S-nitroso-N-acetyl-penicillamine (SNAP) could be a synergistic approach to preventing infection. In this study, the incorporation of SNAP into an albumin-based bioplastic matrix is done via a swelling method.29,30 The thermal and mechanical properties and antibacterial potential of albumin-SNAP plastic are studied to propose it as a promising material for biomedical applications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Albumin (purity ≥99%) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (St. Louis, MO, USA). N-Acetyl-d-penicillamine (NAP), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), sodium chloride, potassium chloride, sodium phosphate dibasic, potassium phosphate monobasic, and sulfuric acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Methanol, hydrochloric acid, and sulfuric acid were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA). Tygon PVC #3603 was obtained from Fisher Scientific. Phosphate buffer saline (PBS), pH 7.4, containing 138 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM sodium phosphate, was used for all in vitro experiments wherever applicable. The bacterial strains Pseudomonas aeruginosa (American Type Culture Collection, ATCC, 27853) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538) were used for the microbicidal characterization.

Preparation of compression molded samples

Compression molding of albumin plastic was performed on a 24-ton bench-top press (Carver Model 3850, Wabash, IN). Seventy-five percent albumin (w/w) was mixed with deionized water, filled into stainless steel molds, and then compressed between the press’s electrically heated and water-cooled platens (Fig. 1). Data presented in this study was generated from albumin plastic samples, compression molded for a 5-min heating time at 120°C, followed by a 10-min cooling period for setting the structure. Plastic samples were produced under a pressure of at least 40 MPa since a certain minimum amount of pressure must be applied to the protein for it to be able to become a plastic.31 After cooling, the pressure was released and the samples were removed. The samples were prepared in batches of ≤6 g for albumin dog bone plastics and 2 g for DMA flex bars. For this study, albumin-water plastics were compared with albumin-water plastics loaded with SNAP (albumin-SNAP). The process for incorporating SNAP into albumin-water plastics is detailed below. The samples were then placed in a conditioning chamber for at least 24 h, and the conditioning chamber was set to 70°F (21.1°C) and 65% relative humidity.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Compression molding schematics of plastic samples. The mold was inserted into the mold and then covered with the Plunger. The mold was then inserted in the Compression Molder. Finally, 40 MPa pressure was applied for 5 min at 250°F followed by cooling for 10 min at 40 MPa.

SNAP synthesis

SNAP was synthesized following the method of Chipinda and Simoyi.32 Equimolar ratios of sodium nitrite and NAP were added to a 1:1 mixture of water and methanol containing 2M HCl and 2M H2SO4. After 30 min of stirring, the reaction vessel was cooled in an ice bath to precipitate the SNAP crystals. The crystals were collected by filtration, washed with water, and allowed to air dry. The reaction and crystals were protected from light at all times.

Incorporating SNAP into albumin plastic

Albumin-water plastic was submerged in methanol that contained 100 mg/mL of dissolved SNAP. The selected concentration was near the solubility of SNAP in methanol, providing an upper limit of NO-release potential from the albumin plastic. When placed in methanol bath, the albumin plastic was found to increase in mass by 20% (data not shown). The albumin plastic was allowed to swell in the SNAP-methanol solution for 24 hours at room temperature. After 24 hours, the albumin plastic was removed from the SNAP-methanol solution, rinsed with methanol to remove excess SNAP, and dried at room temperature under vacuum. During the drying process, the plastic returned to its original dimensions. After loading SNAP into the albumin plastic, the samples were stored at −4°C before use to prevent NO release. The samples were protected from light (due to the sensitivity of SNAP to light) by placing them in containers wrapped in aluminum foil. Albumin-water plastic was also swelled with methanol for 24 hours and dried at room temperature to study effects of methanol on albumin-water plastic.

Thermal analysis of samples

Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) was performed using a Mettler Toledo TGA/SDTA851e. Samples were tested at 25–500°C under a N2 atmosphere with a heating rate of 10°C min−1. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) was performed using a Mettler Toledo DSC821e, with materials examined from −20 to 250°C under a N2 atmosphere with a heating rate of 10°C min−1. For all sample testing, each sample was cut and tested at a weight of 2.0–4.0 mg to ensure consistent results.

Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA)

The DMA flex bars of the albumin plastics were analyzed for their viscoelastic properties through the use of DMA by using a DMA 8000 Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer from Perkin Elmer.33 DMA experiments were conducted from 25 to 120°C, with a temperature ramp of 2°C min−1. The settings of the analyzer were set to dimensions of 9 × 2.5 × 12.5 mm3 using a dual-cantilever setup at a frequency of 1 Hz with a displacement of 0.05 mm. Each sample type was analyzed in duplicate.

NO release measurements

NO released from the albumin-SNAP plastic was measured using a Sievers Chemiluminescence NO Analyzer (NOA) 280 (Boulder, CO) for 3 h continuously. This method is a gold standard for the measurement of NO.17,34 The detection of NO is achieved through the reaction of NO with ozone to form excited NO2 in a localized reaction chamber. As the excited nitrates go back to their ground state, photons are released and captured by the photomultiplier tube and are then converted into molar release rates via a calibration curve. This approach allows for high selectivity to NO, where other methods can be influenced by nitrates and nitrites present. Samples were placed in the sample vessel immersed in PBS (pH 7.4) containing 100 mM EDTA. NO was continuously purged from the buffer and swept from the headspace using an N2 sweep gas and bubbles into the chemiluminescence detection chamber. Films were submerged in PBS with EDTA and maintained at 37°C for the duration of the measurement. The surface area of the albumin-SNAP plastic samples was used to normalize NO release between samples. LOWESS smoothing was applied to the data with a span of 0.01.

Morphological properties of albumin, albumin-SNAP, and PVC plastics

The surface morphology of albumin, and albumin-SNAP, was evaluated using optical microscopy and atomic force microscopy. Samples were viewed using an Olympus BX50 optical microscope with a camera at 20× magnification. Samples were also measured by a Bruker atomic force microscope (Dimension Icon or Multimode) with ScanAsyst at 40 μm scan size.

Gram-positive and gram-negative viable bacteria adhesion studies

The bacterial adhesion assay developed by Torres et al. was used to compare the antimicrobial properties of commercially available Tygon PVC plastic, albumin plastic, and NO releasing albumin-SNAP plastic.35 Viable colony counting of adhered bacteria was tested using two bacterial strains, gram-negative P. aeruginosa and the gram-positive S. aureus. Each strain was grown individually at 37°C overnight in LB broth medium. The optical density of bacterial culture was measured at the wavelength of 600 nm (O.D600) using UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Genesis 10 S, Thermo Scientific). The culture was centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 10 min; the supernatant was discarded and cells were resuspended in a fresh PBS. To remove traces of the medium, the resulting solution was centrifuged again at 2500 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded, and fresh PBS was added to resuspend the cells for further use in the bacterial adhesion study. The O.D600 of the cell suspension in PBS was measured and adjusted to ensure that the colony forming units (CFUs) per mL of PBS (CFU/mL) is in the range of 106–108. To verify the concentration of viable cells between experiments, serial dilutions of both bacterial strains were prepared and plated on LB agar Petri dishes. Per each strain, triplicates of all samples (PVC, albumin, and albumin-SNAP) were surface sterilized with 70% ethanol and UV-treated for 15 min. Each sample was placed in a 15 mL tube and exposed to 2 mL of the bacterial suspension (CFU: 106–108) at 37°C for 3 h at rocking speed of 24 rpm. After three hours, the samples were removed from the bacterial suspension and rinsed with fresh PBS to remove any unbound/loosely bound bacterial cells. Afterward, each sample was transferred to a new tube containing fresh 2 mL PBS and sonicated for 45 s to detach the bound bacteria from the plastic. The resulting solution, which has bacterial cells was then vortexed for 20 s, serial dilutions were prepared, and cells were plated on LB agar and incubated overnight at 37°C. The CFUs were visually counted and CFUs per square centimeter of the test sample (CFU/cm2) was calculated.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Thermal properties of albumin-based plastics

For all albumin-based plastics, the initial degradation peak between 220 and 230°C indicates bound moisture loss within the protein (Fig. 2), and the much larger degradation peak at 300–315°C indicates amino acid degradation.14,36 When the albumin-SNAP plastic is analyzed further, it appeared to have similar thermal properties to pure albumin powder. The albumin-swell samples exhibited endothermic peaks that were more similar to albumin-water plastics than albumin-SNAP samples. Albumin-SWELL samples do not contain any SNAP, which can explain this difference. Methanol does not appear to drastically change the properties of albumin-water. The thermogravimetric analysis of SNAP showed two degradation peaks, one at 155°C and one at 201°C. These results correspond to a previous study where results showed that when SNAP is subjected to DSC analysis, it decomposed at 148°C while TGA indicated NO loss at 148°C.37 The TGA of the albumin-SNAP plastic gives no indication that either peak is present, probably because the amount of SNAP present within the albumin plastic is too small for TGA instrument to detect. There is a possibility that the peak occurring between 200 and 225°C is a result of an overlap of SNAP degradation peak around 200°C and the bound water loss peak at 220 and 230°C.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Thermogravimetric analysis of albumin-based plastics.

When analyzed using DSC, significant endothermic peak at 75°C for pure albumin powder can be witnessed, but more broad peaks for albumin-water plastic.14 Albumin-SNAP demonstrated a similar endothermic peak (75°C) as pure albumin. The similar trends of thermal degradation were observed in the albumin-swell samples as albumin-SNAP samples. While the albumin-swell plastics exhibit a lower magnitude peak around 230–240°C, they will also exhibit a broader degradation peak around 275–350°C. Soaking the albumin-water samples in methanol does not appear to drastically change its properties.

On comparing the pure protein powder to the bioplastics using DSC (Fig. 3), the protein powder degraded at a lower temperature (210–215°C) than the protein bioplastics (220–225°C). This increase in degradation temperature could be caused by the more thermally stable structure formation in the bioplastics because of heat, pressure, and cooling conditions during processing. Adding water increased the molecular interactions within protein bioplastic.38

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

DSC of albumin-based plastics.

Viscoelastic properties of albumin-based plastics

DMA was performed on the plastic samples to determine their viscoelastic properties (Fig. 4). With this analysis, albumin plastic containing no plasticizer results in a brittle material that exhibits high initial modulus (3.479 E9 Pa) and low initial tan delta (0.057). In contrast, when plasticized with water the resulting albumin-water plastic is more flexible as evidenced by a lower initial modulus (4.128 E8 Pa) and a higher initial tan delta value (0.204). The addition of plasticizer into the protein matrix forms a more heterogeneous plastic since the water embeds itself between protein chains.39 The DMA results showed that the albumin-water plastics containing SNAP display viscoelastic properties that are more similar to pure albumin protein plastics than plasticized albumin-water plastics. Therefore, the albumin-SNAP plastics will be more brittle than albumin-water plastics, with high initial modulus (1.532 E9 Pa) and low initial tan δ value (0.081). When SNAP is added to albumin-water via methanol, albumin-SNAP becomes stiffer than albumin-water, possibly due to the alcohol-water exchange with bound water being displaced.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

DMA of albumin-based plastics to measure its viscoelastic properties.

Morphological properties of albumin, albumin-SNAP, and PVC plastics

The surface of a material plays a crucial role in affecting the degree of its interaction with blood proteins and bacteria. Therefore, it is important to assure that the antibacterial material added to the material does not alter its surface properties. The morphologies and surface roughness of the albumin plastic was compared before and after addition of SNAP. The optical imaging of the albumin and albumin SNAP material at 20× resolution showed a similarity in surface morphologies [Fig. 5(a,b)]. This can be attributed to their similarities in processing conditions. To further validate it, sample roughness was observed under Atomic Force Microscope. Similar to optical images, no significant difference was observed between albumin and albumin-SNAP plastic [Fig. 6(a,b)]. These observations provide supportive evidence that solvent swelling of SNAP into albumin plastic does not deteriorate its surface morphology. This is in agreement with other reports where the addition of SNAP into biomedical grade polymers have been shown to maintain the surface properties such as contact angle and smoothness.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

Optical Microscopy Images (20×) of (a) albumin and (b) albumin- SNAP. Scale bar = 200 μm.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

Atomic Force Microscopy images of (a) albumin and (b) albumin-SNAP. Scale bar = 20 μm.

Antibacterial potential of NO-releasing albumin-SNAP plastic

The NO release from samples of albumin-SNAP plastic was measured under physiological conditions (in PBS buffer at 37°C) using a chemiluminescence NO analyzer. Albumin-SNAP plastic samples showed a burst of NO release initially, followed by a sustained release. The sustained release rate of NO release during this 3 h period was 18.5 ± 3.9 × 10−10 mol min−1 cm−2. A representative release profile of NO from the albumin plastic is shown in Figure 7.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7.

Real-time NO release from albumin-SNAP plastic at physiological conditions (pH 7.4, 37°C) using chemiluminescence.

A bacterial adhesion study was conducted to test the ability of albumin-SNAP plastic to prevent the adhesion of bacteria on its surface as compared to albumin-water plastic and traditionally used PVC plastic. Albumin from hen egg white has been found in a previous study to prevent bacterial growth.13 For both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, our ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) concludes that all the three factors (PVC, albumin-water, and albumin-SNAP) are not the same. The multiple comparisons conclusively prove that each pair is different at 99% level of confidence.

Albumin-water plastic by itself (without SNAP) significantly reduced the number of adhered viable S. aureus cells by 86.6% when compared to commercially available PVC, as shown in Figure 8. It also significantly inhibited P. aeruginosa by 80.2% when compared with PVC (Figure 9). SNAP was incorporated into the albumin-water plastic to increase albumin’s ability to inhibit bacteria by releasing NO. NO’s antibacterial properties are due to its ability to cause protein denaturation, DNA breakage and lipid peroxidation in bacterial cells.40 Adding SNAP to albumin-water plastic reduced the adhered viable bacteria by 90.2 and 92.6% for S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, respectively when compared to albumin plastic alone. However, the NO releasing albumin plastic, possessing an average NO flux of 18.5 ± 3.9 ×10−10 mol min−1 cm−2, resulted in a statistically significant decrease in S. aureus and P. aeruginosa bacterial adhesion as compared with traditionally used PVC plastic. At the reported NO flux, the adhesion of S. aureus was reduced by 98.7% and P. aeruginosa by 98.5% (Figs. 8 and 9). The results of this study are in agreement with a previous study, which showed NO’s bactericidal effect against gram-positive and gram-negative membrane via slow and sustained release from natural polymer membrane.17,25,34,4144 If albumin-SNAP plastic can prevent the adhesion of bacteria on its surface, it might also be able to prevent biofilm formation and resulting infections, especially in situations where complications due to infection from biomedical device implantation or surgery are foreseeable. The NO releasing strategy is not supposed to cause the development of bacterial resistance strain due to its rapid and non-specific killing mechanism load.4547 It has also been shown that the NO donor, SNAP works equally well in combination with other antibacterial material such as quaternary ammonium ions which thus expands its application.34 The results from this study suggest that imparting NO releasing attribute to albumin plastics could expand their utility in biomedical applications.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8.

Graphical representation showing a reduction in the viable CFU of S. aureus using commercially available PVC as the reference. Albumin is significantly different than PVC (p < 0.01) and albumin is significantly different than albumin-SNAP (p < 0.01).

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 9.

Graphical representation showing a reduction in the viable CFU of P. aeruginosa using commercially available PVC as the reference. Albumin is significantly different than PVC (p < 0.01) and albumin is significantly different than albumin-SNAP (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Infections resulting from microbial biofilm formation remain a serious threat to patients worldwide. The use of albumin-SNAP plastic presents an opportunity to prevent the spread of diseases in hospitals from biomedical devices since this material has been found to prevent bacterial growth on its surface. In the present study, SNAP molecules (NO donor) were successfully integrated into the albumin plastic through swelling in methanol. The addition of SNAP does not significantly affect the properties of the material since the thermal and mechanical properties of the material were similar to albumin materials without SNAP. The release of NO from the albumin plastic was measured and showed a sustained release of 18.5 ± 3.9 × 10−10 mol min−1 cm−2 after 3 h. The sustained release of NO complemented the antibacterial albumin bioplastic and ultimately resulted in inhibiting the growth of both gram-positive S. aureus and gram-negative P. aeruginosa on a plastic surface. Thus, the incorporation of NO donor in albumin plastic offers a great potential for the utilization and development of a class of biomedical devices that could prevent biofilm formation and nosocomial infections, and reduce associated treatment cost. NO-releasing albumin plastics may offer a new paradigm for addressing the infection caused by biofilm deposition over biomedical devices surfaces, such as catheters, stents, sutures, and in vivo sensors.

Contract grant sponsor:

National Institutes of Health, USA grants; contract grant numbers: K25HL111213 and R01HL134899

Contract grant sponsor: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); contract grant number: 200-2016-91933

REFERENCES

  • 1.Klevens RM, Edwards JR, Richards CL, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Pollock DA, Cardo DM. Estimating Health Care-Associated Infections and Deaths in U.S. Hospitals, 2002. Public Health Rep 2007; 122:160–166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Eggimann P, Sax H, Pittet D. Catheter-related infections. Microbes Infect 2004;6:1033–1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Forster AJ, Taljaard M, Oake N, Wilson K, Roth V, van Walraven C. The effect of hospital-acquired infection with Clostridium difficile on length of stay in hospital. CMAJ 2012;184:37–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Siragusa GR, Cutter CN, Willett JL. Incorporation of bacteriocin in plastic retains activity and inhibits surface growth of bacteria on meat. Food Microbiol 1999;16:229–235. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Da Costa AR, Kothari A, Bannister GC, Blom AW. Investigating bacterial growth in surgical theatres: Establishing the effect of laminar airflow on bacterial growth on plastic, metal, and wood surfaces. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008;90:417–419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Neely AN, Maley MP. Survival of Enterococci and Staphylococci on hospital fabrics and plastic. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:724–726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Allan ND, Giare-Patel K, Olson ME. An in vivo rabbit model for the evaluation of antimicrobial peripherally inserted central catheter to reduce microbial migration and colonization as compared to an uncoated PICC. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012;2012:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Otto M Staphylococcal infections: Mechanisms of biofilm maturation and detachment as critical determinants of pathogenicity. Annu Rev Med 2013;64:175–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kiedrowski MR, Horswill AR. New approaches for treating staphylococcal biofilm infections. Ann NY Acad Sci 2011;1241:104–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jerez A, Partal P, Martinez I, Gallegos C, Guerrero A. Egg white-based bioplastics developed by thermomechanical processing. J Food Eng 2007;82:608–617. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nagapudi K, Brinkman WT, Leisen J, Thomas BS, Wright ER, Haller C, Wu X, Apkarian RP, Conticello VP, Chaikof EL. Protein-Based Thermoplastic Elastomers. Macromolecules 2005;38:345–354. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Banerjee R, Chen H. Functional properties of edible films using whey protein concentrate. J Dairy Sci 1995;78:1673–1683. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Baron F, Réhault S. Compounds with Antibacterial Activity. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jones A, Zeller MA, Sharma S. Thermal, mechanical, and moisture absorption properties of egg white protein bioplastics with natural rubber and glycerol. Prog Biomater 2013;2:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gillgren T, Stading M. Mechanical and Barrier Properties of Avenin, Kafirin, and Zein Films. Food Biophys 2008;3:287–294. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jones A, Mandal A, Sharma S. Protein-based bioplastics and their antibacterial potential. J Appl Polym Sci 2015;132. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pant J, Goudie MJ, Hopkins SP, Brisbois EJ, Handa H. Tunable Nitric Oxide Release from S-Nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine via Catalytic Copper Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017;9:15254–15264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vaughn MW, Kuo L, Liao JC. Estimation of nitric oxide production and reactionrates in tissue by use of a mathematical model. Am J Physiol 1998;274:H2163–H2176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hou YC, Janczuk A, Wang PG. Current trends in the development of nitric oxide donors. Curr Pharm Des 1999;5:417–441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Halpenny GM, Heilman B, Mascharak PK. Nitric oxide (NO)-induced death of gram-negative bacteria from a light controlled NO-releasing platform. Chem Biodivers 2012;9:1829–1839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Goudie MJ, Brisbois EJ, Pant J, Thompson A, Potkay JA, Handa H. Characterization of S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine-based nitric oxide releasing polymer from a translational perspective. Int J Polym Biomater 2016;65:769–778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rouby JJ. The nose, nitric oxide, and paranasal sinuses: The outpost of pulmonary antiinfectious defenses? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;168:265–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Seabra AR, Pereira PA, Becker JD, Carvalho HG. Inhibition of glutamine synthetase by phosphinothricin leads to transcriptome reprograming in root nodules of Medicago truncatula. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2012;25:976–992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Frost M, Meyerhoff ME. In vivo chemical sensors: tackling biocompatibility. Anal Chem 2006;78:7370–7377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brisbois EJ, Davis RP, Jones AM, Major TC, Bartlett RH, Meyerhoff ME, Handa H. Reduction in thrombosis and bacterial adhesion with 7 day implantation of S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP)-doped Elast-eon E2As catheters in sheep. J Mater Chem B 2015;3:1639–1645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Handa H, Major TC, Brisbois EJ, Amoako KA, Meyerhoff ME, Bartlett RH. Hemocompatibility comparison of biomedical grade polymers using rabbit thrombogenicity model for preparing non-thrombogenic nitric oxide releasing surfaces. J Mater Chem B 2014;2:1059–1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Major TC, Brisbois EJ, Jones AM, Zanetti ME, Annich GM, Bartlett RH, Handa H. The effect of a polyurethane coating incorporating both a thrombin inhibitor and nitric oxide on hemocapatibility in extracorporeal circulation. Biomaterials 2014;35:7271–7285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Brisbois EJ, Major TC, Goudie MJ, Meyerhoff ME, Bartlett RH, Handa H. Attenuation of thrombosis and bacterial infection using dual function nitric oxide releasing central venous catheters in a 9 day rabbit model. Acta Biomater 2016;44:304–312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liquid-infused nitric oxide-releasing (LINORel) silicone for decreased fouling, thrombosis, and infection of medical devices, Scientific Reports 7, Article number 13623; doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14012-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Brisbois EJ, Major TC, Goudie MJ, Bartlett RH, Meyerhoff ME, Handa H. Improved hemocompatibility of silicone rubber extracorporeal tubing via solvent swelling-impregnation of S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) and evaluation in rabbit thrombogenicity model. Acta Biomater 2016;37:111–119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sue H-J, Wang S, Jane J-L. Morphology and mechanical behaviour of engineering soy plastics. Polymer 1997;38:5035–5040. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chipinda I, Simoyi RH. Formation and stability of a nitric oxide donor: S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine. J Phys Chem B 2006;110: 5052–5061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Menard K Dynamic Mechanical Analysis: A Practical Introduction. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pant J, Gao J, Goudie MJ, Hopkins S, Locklin J, Handa H. A multi-defense strategy: Enhancing bactericidal activity of a medical grade polymer with a nitric oxide donor and surface-immobilized quaternary ammonium compound. Acta Biomater 2017;58:421–431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Torres N, Oh S, Appleford M, Dean DD, Jorgensen JH, Ong JL, Agrawal CM, Mani G. Stability of antibacterial self-assembled monolayers on hydroxyapatite. Acta Biomater 2010;6:3242–3255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Magoshi J, Nakamura S, Murakami KI. Structure and physical properties of seed proteins. I. Glass transition and crystallization of zein protein from corn. J Appl Polym Sci 1992;45:2043–2048. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bainbrigge N, Butler AR, Görbitz C. The thermal stability of S-nitrosothiols: Experimental studies and ab initio calculations on model compounds. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2 1997;351–354. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pouplin M, Redl A, Gontard N. Glass transition of wheat gluten plasticized with water, glycerol, or sorbitol. J Agric Food Chem 1999;47:538–543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang J, Mungara P, Jane J. Mechanical and thermal properties of extruded soy protein sheets. Polymer 2001;42:2569–2578. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fang FC. Perspectives series: host/pathogen interactions. Mechanisms of nitric oxide-related antimicrobial activity. J Clin Invest 1998;99:9818–9825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sundaram J, Pant J, Goudie MJ, Mani S, Handa H. Antimicrobial and physiological characterization of biodegradable, nitric oxide-releasing nanocellulose-chitosan packaging. J Agric Food Chem 2016;64:5260–5266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hetrick EM, Schoenfisch MH. Reducing implant-related infections: active release strategies. Chem Soc Rev 2006;35:780–789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Privett BJ, Broadnax AD, Bauman SJ, Riccio DA, Schoenfisch MH. Examination of bacterial resistance to exogenous nitric oxide. Nitric Oxide 2012;26:169–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nablo BJ, Chen TY, Schoenfisch MH. Sol-gel derived nitric-oxide releasing materials that reduce bacterial adhesion. J Am Chem Soc 2001;123:9712–9713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hetrick EM, Schoenfisch MH. Antibacterial nitric oxide-releasing xerogels: Cell viability and parallel plate flow cell adhesion studies. Biomaterials 2007;28:1948–1956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Feelisch M The use of nitric oxide donors in pharmacological studies. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 1998;358:113–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bogdan C Nitric oxide and the immune response. Nat Immunol 2001;2:907–916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES