Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Nov 22;17(11):e0277933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277933

Measuring the impact of climate change on potato production in Bangladesh using Bayesian Hierarchical Spatial-temporal modeling

Md Sifat Ar Salan 1, Md Moyazzem Hossain 1,*, Imran Hossain Sumon 1, Md Mizanur Rahman 2, Mohammad Alamgir Kabir 1, Ajit Kumar Majumder 1
Editor: Sathishkumar V E3
PMCID: PMC9681075  PMID: 36413573

Abstract

Background

Potato is a staple food and a main crop of Bangladesh. Climate plays an important role in different crop production all over the world. Potato production is influenced by climate change, which is occurring at a rapid pace according to time and space.

Objective

The main objective of this research is to observe the variation in potato production based on the discrepancy of the variability in the spatial and temporal domains. The research is based on secondary data on potato production from different parts of Bangladesh and five major climate variables for the last 17 years ending with 2020.

Methods

Bayesian Spatial-temporal modelling for linear, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and auto-Regressive models were used to find the best-fitted model compared with the independent Error Bayesian model. The Watanabe-Akaike information criterion (WAIC) and Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) were used as the model choice criteria and the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method was implemented to generate information about the prior and posterior realizations.

Results

Findings revealed that the ANOVA model under the Spatial-temporal framework was the best model for all model choice and validation criteria. Results depict that there is a significant impact of spatial and temporal variation on potato yield rate. Besides, the windspeed does not show any influence on potato production, however, temperature, humidity, rainfall, and sunshine are important components of potato yield rate in Bangladesh.

Conclusion

It is evident that there is a potential impact of climate change on potato production in Bangladesh. Therefore, the authors believed that the findings will be helpful to the policymakers or farmers in developing potato varieties that are resilient to climate change to ensure the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal of zero hunger.

Introduction

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is the most efficient crop and the third most significant food crop on the planet. Bangladesh, which is ranked seventh in the globe, is now a significant producer of potatoes in the SAARC region [1]. To achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-2, zero hunger as well as to ensure the food demand of our country’s constantly expanding population, people have relied heavily on the major cereal crops of rice, wheat, and maize in order to ensure food security. In order to maintain food security in the coming decades, it is necessary to reduce our reliance on grains and potatoes can be a suitable alternative. Researchers highlighted that education and training are beneficial for enhancing potato grower’s capacity to absorb and comprehend information about contemporary technologies that may help to produce more potatoes [2]. However, the current situation of global potato production unfolds in the context of climate change, which is projected to impair potato production due to rising temperatures, increased atmospheric CO2, shifting precipitation patterns, and more extreme weather events [3]. It is already established that crop production is highly dependent on climate and a previous study pointed out that climate change can reduce 25.7% of total crop production by 2080 [4]. A previous study highlighted the impacts of climate variables on rice production in Bangladesh [5]. However, all the crops are not equally affected by climate indicators. Plant growth, development, and yield are mainly influenced by temperature, and day degrees are commonly employed to assess this effect [6]. Only temperate climates with lengthy days are suitable for growing potatoes because of their extreme thermos-sensitivity. Besides, potato plants are sensitive to water shortages. It seems expected that the present global warming trend (0.6±0.2°C), which has been observed since 1900, will continue, and that the average world temperature will rise by 1.4 to 5.8°C between 1990 and 2100 [7]. This rise in temperature might have a significant influence on potato farming across the world [8]. Potato is also frost-sensitive, and significant damage can result when the temperature falls below zero degrees Celsius [9]. Moreover, precipitation and the hydrological cycle have received increasing attention recently [10]. Potato might be severely impacted, putting millions of farmers, particularly small and marginal growers, at risk of losing their livelihood and food security. Overall crop productivity will most likely drop as a result of this sort of climate change, although there will be significant regional variances [11].

According to research by the Universal Ecological Fund (FEU-US), rising temperatures would have a significant impact on the world’s food output, with subcontinents on the Indian oceans being the most negatively impacted [12]. However, potato trees can flourish in both cold and warm conditions since they can withstand both drought and barren conditions, while they are less resistant to high temperatures and humidity [13]. The distribution of heat and rainfall throughout the winter months in Bangladesh is synchronized with the developing and extending phases of the potato tuber, making conditions ideal for the growth of potatoes. A previous study pointed out that there is an impact of climatic change on the water use efficiency (WUE) of potatoes in the northwest semiarid area of China [14]. The findings showed that, as a result of climatic warming and a decrease in rainfall during that time, the WUE of potatoes dramatically rose [14]. The majority of crops grown in northern Europe, including potatoes, are anticipated to experience better-growing conditions as a result of warmer temperatures and higher CO2 levels [15], though there was inevitably unfavorable effects that varied in terms of time and space [16]. In northern China, the potato yield was most susceptible to changes in the diurnal temperature range, followed by radiation, precipitation, and evapotranspiration [17], late potato development was sensitive to the optimum temperature setting in northern Europe [18], and spatial variability impacts potato production [19]. The maximum temperature, comparatively heavy rain, and irrigation all had an effect on the yield of potatoes in China [20].

Due to its location smack dab in the middle of the Himalayas and the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh, a developing economy, is regarded as one of the planet’s most climate-sensitive countries. The increased frequency of natural disasters brought on by global warming has a severe influence on crop productivity, both directly and indirectly. A previous study highlighted that Bangladesh is blessed with extraordinarily fertile soil, temperate temperatures, and ample rainfall that enable the year-round production of a range of crops [21]. Bangladesh is expected to find the optimum setting for boosting potato production to meet the growing food demand given its limited agricultural land. Small variations in climatic conditions may be effectively controlled by adjusting planting dates, spacing, and input management. Also, regional variation can have a significant impact on potato production. Different regions do not experience the same environmental changes. As with the environmental variability, the production of potatoes is also varying regionally. It is anticipated that changes in potato production may be related to both geographic location and climate variables. Therefore, the authors aimed to find out the potential consequences of climate change on potato production in different regions of Bangladesh. A Bayesian Hierarchical Spatial-temporal model has been used to examine the variations among the spatial domains and changes over time. The Bayesian spatio-temporal model is primarily based on the Bayesian framework, which takes into account both the location and time domains. Given the large fluctuation in production based on time and location, this model can be particularly useful for modeling agricultural data [22]. It enhances modeling for the agro-climatic environment because the spatio-temporal model only functions for the specific data frame that contains the time variable as well as the space variable. Therefore, the authors believed that the findings will aid researchers looking into how various climate factors affect various agricultural crops around the world.

Methods and materials

Data collection, and study area

The secondary data on potato production was extracted from the different Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics of Bangladesh published by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) for all 64 districts of Bangladesh over the period 2004–2020 [23]. The area of the potato production is measured in the acre and the total production is in Metric tons. Climate variables of 35 weather stations were collected from the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC) for the same time interval [24]. The authors used the district’s neighbouring weather station information (if that district doesn’t have a weather station) to generate the climatic data for 64 districts.

Variables

The annual total potato production was the combination of local and hybrid (HYV) production. The yield rates were considered as the response variables of the model. The information on the harvested areas for all two types of production is also included as an exposure to the response. In this study, the annual average of maximum temperature (0C), rainfall (mm), sunshine (hour), wind speed (m/s), and humidity (%) were considered as the covariates. Moreover, the spatial domain was the districts (2nd administrative level) containing 64 unique district names and the temporal domain was the 17 years for the consecutive districts. Therefore, each variable contains 1088 (64×17) observations (rows).

Bayesian hierarchical model

The response variable, yield rate Edt for d = 1,2,…,64 and t = 1,2,…,17 was assumed to follow the Gaussian distribution, EdtN(μdt,σdt2). Let, xdt indicates the p-dimensional Spatio-temporal covariates at space–time combination d and t that may influence potato yield rate. In order to create explanatory models based on covariates and structured spatio-temporal random effects is denoted by ψdt and the model can be expressed as,

Edtxdtβ+ψdt, (1)

for d = 1,2,…,64 and t = 1,2,…,17. The random effects ψdt are assumed to have the following diverse range of models based on various assumptions regarding their architecture. To select the appropriate model, Bayesian model selection criteria such as the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) [25] and Watanabe-Akaike information criterion (WAIC) [26] were used in this study. The general spatial-temporal models were considered as,

ψdt={ϕd+δt+γdt,AnovaModelβ1+ϕd+(β2+δd)tt¯T,LinearModelofTrendϕdt+δt,AutoRegressiveModel

for d = 1,2,…,64 and t = 1,2,…,17. In the ANOVA model, ϕ, δ and γ are sets of random effects parameters and let ϕ = (ϕ1,…,ϕd) and δ = (δ1,…,δt). We assume that the distributions of the priors of the models follow conditional autoregressive (CAR) with ρS,ρT,τS2,τT2 where these are the auto-regression and variance parameters of the spatial and temporal inference [27].

The hierarchical Bayesian spatial-temporal model has been applied to satisfy the objectives starting with the independent error Bayesian generalized linear model (GLM) and few spatial-temporal models by adding the spatial and temporal domains were considered. The MCMC methods have been implemented to estimate the priors for estimating the Posterior estimation. In the CARBayes package [28], the unknown variance parameter in the Gaussian model is provided by default an inverse gamma prior distribution with shape parameter = 1 and scale parameter = 0.01. The bmstdr package is used to prepare all the models, plots and maps.

Ethical statement

Not applicable.

Results

The authors assumed that Ydt denotes the total potato production for dth district and tth year. Here d = 1,2,…,64 as 64 districts and t = 1,2,…,17 for 17 years from 2004 to 2020. The magnitude of Ydt depends on the consecutive harvested area Zdt of a particular district and year. The yield rate is denoted by Edt and is defined as, Edt=YdtZdt; d = 1,2,…,64 and t = 1,2,…,17. Similar measures have been used to estimate for local and HYV production EdtL and EdtH.

It is observed that the total production of potatoes is increasing over the last two decades in Bangladesh [Fig 1(A)]. The maximum production of potatoes in Bangladesh was 1,59,624.38 metric tons in 2017 and the Munsiganj district was on the top in annual total potato production and yield rate within the time frame. In 2016, the farmers of Munsiganj produced 12,42,329 metric tons of potatoes which was the district level maximum from 2004 to 2020. However, the maximum area was used to harvest the potato from the Bogura district [Fig 1(B)].

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Potato production in Bangladesh, (a) time series plot, (b) spatial distribution.

To explore the relationship between potato production and the climate variables, the authors used a pairwise scatter plot presented in Fig 2. The square root of the temperature and the log of the rainfall has been used to adjust the scale with the target variable. The numerical values of the plot revealed the existence of various moderate associations among variables. A significant positive association is observed between temperature and yield rate, however humidity and sunshine having a significant negative association with it. The rainfall is not correlated with the yield rate and wind speed has a weak relationship with yield rate [Fig 2].

Fig 2. Matrix scatter plot of the selected variables.

Fig 2

*** refers p-value <0.001, ** refers p-value <0.05 and * refers p-value <0.1.

The nature of the significant covariates according to the spatial domain is also displayed in Fig 3. It is observed that all the figures show a significant variation in-between different regions of the Bangladesh. However, the capital (Dhaka) and Bangladesh’s coastal region had relatively low humidity.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

District wise variation of climate variables (a) maximum temperature, (b) humidity, (c) wind speed, and (d) sunshine.

The strength of humidity is a bit high in the northeast part compared to other regions and the opposite scenario is visible on the map of temperate. It is also seen that both have a different association with the potato yield rate. The windspeed is almost uniform over the whole country except for the coastal area and the sunshine is as like as the temperature [Fig 3].

Before starting the modelling with the spatial and temporal domain, the authors preferred to begin with an independent error Bayesian model so that it can be understood the improvement when the spatial and temporal effects are incorporated into the model. The linear predictor xdtβ can be specified in the model as,

temperature+rainfall+humidity+windspeed+sunshine

where the temperature is in square root scale and rainfall is in log scale. All the models were run under 100,000 iterations after 20,000 burn-in iterations. In the MCMC context, the data were stored after a thinning of 10 iterations to decrease autocorrelation.

Table 1 depicts the parameter estimates of all four models with 95% credible intervals. From the credible interval of all the models, it is clear that wind speed does not have any impact on potato production. The rainfall is also insignificant in the independent error model and linear model in the Spatial-temporal framework which matches with the pair-wise scatter plot. However, the ANOVA model and the AR model showed a significance influence of rainfall on response. Raising of temperature will also increase the production of potatoes, on the other hand, the increase in sunshine time will do the opposite.

Table 1. Estimated parameters with their credible interval for all proposed models.

Independent Error Bayesian GLM Bayesian Spatial-temporal Models
Linear Model ANOVA Model AR Model
Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate
(Credible Interval) (Credible Interval) (Credible Interval) (Credible Interval)
Intercept -15.463 -15.539 -11.234 -13.316
(-26.441, -4.545) (-26.71, -4.089) (-22.797, -0.311) (-24.652, -1.49)
Temperature 5.594 5.7 4.823 5.134
(3.801, 7.435) (3.826, 7.607) (2.867, 6.752) (3.173, 7.08)
Rainfall 0.372 0.46 0.829 0.824
(-0.356, 1.108) (-0.297, 1.221) (0.016, 1.638) (0.004, 1.637)
Humidity -0.073 -0.074 -0.078 -0.074
(-0.111, -0.035) (-0.114, -0.034) (-0.121, -0.036) (-0.116, -0.032)
Windspeed 0.005 -0.038 0.06 0.019
(-0.239, 0.244) (-0.288, 0.21) (-0.193, 0.307) (-0.232, 0.269)
Sunshine -0.763 -0.859 -0.859 -0.858
(-0.978, -0.545) (-1.09, -0.625) (-1.1, -0.63) (-1.089, -0.621)
τS2 - - 0.204 -
(0.105, 0.416)
τT2 - - 0.377 0.272
(0.192, 0.822) (0.134, 0.564)
ν 2 3.786 3.632 3.409 3.366
(3.488, 4.128) (3.331, 3.986) (3.121, 3.724) (3.07, 3.704)
ρ S - - 0.444 0.982
(0.058, 0.896) (0.935, 0.994)
ρ T - - 0.256 0.094
(0.013, 0.778) (0.004, 0.389)
α - -0.823 - -
(-1.236, -0.397)
τint2 - 0.198 - -
(0.102, 0.401)
τslo2 - 0.309 - -
(0.132, 0.85)
ρ int - 0.48 - -
(0.069, 0.907)
ρ slo - 0.394 - -
(0.022, 0.905)

The MCMC sample that is used to produce model choice criteria is presented in Table 2. Based on the DIC and WAIC, the ANOVA model is the best-fitted model, and based on likelihood value it is said that the Autoregressive model is better. Findings also revealed that the ANOVA model provides the best fit for the sample generated by MCMC. The convergence is also maximum compared to the other models. So, the subsequent discussion is focused on the ANOVA model. The value of ρS is 0.444 which is a good evidence of spatial correlation and is quite higher than the value of ρT, which indicates that potato production is strongly dependent on spatial variation than temporal effect. The values of τS2 and τT2 is non zero for the ANOVA model from Table 1, which indicates that the spatial and temporal variation exists in the potato production per acre and also establishes the urgency of considering the spatial and temporal domain in the model.

Table 2. Performance measures of the selected models.

Models Model Choice Criteria Model Validation Criteria
DIC WAIC LMPL loglikelihood rmse mae crps cvg
Independent Error GLM 4546.793 4547.047 -2273.52 -2266.42 2.060 1.707 1.154 95.37
Linear Model 4080.063 4080.328 -2040.22 -2009.82 2.038 1.681 1.03 95.37
Autoregressive Model 4032.988 4034.547 -2017.67 -1958.16 2.015 1.651 1.133 94.444
ANOVA Model 4027.623 4028.624 -2014.4 -1973.67 2.013 1.644 0.932 95.64

The MCMC iteration produces fitted values for each observed response and the residuals are calculated. These residuals are then aggregated according to the range of the temporal domain to obtain the spatial residuals and standard deviation of the residuals for each spatial domain d. Fig 4 illustrates the spatially aggregated residual and SD of the residuals estimated from the spatio-temporal ANOVA model and the plots do not show any significant spatial pattern that needs further investigation. Moreover, Fig 5 depicts the temporally aggregated values for potato production. We used the fitted potato production per acre by dividing the total production by the corresponding area.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

District wise residual plot, (a) spatially aggregated residuals, (b) standard error of the residuals.

Fig 5. Time-series plot for observed and fitted potato production with 95% confidence intervals.

Fig 5

The fitted values look quite balanced over the whole time period. No significant overestimate or underestimate is observed from the plot. The lower and upper lines are also quite close to the fitted values, which indicates a good accuracy of the ANOVA model for the Spatial-temporal framework [Fig 5].

Discussion

Findings depict that Bangladesh’s overall annual potato production has increased over the past 20 years. A previous study predicted that the trend in potato production would be rising [29]. One of the key causes is that the government has been promoting the consumption of potatoes to diversify eating habits and ease the pressure on rice. The potato plant grows in certain weather conditions and this is why the weather indicators have an impact on it in many ways. On the basis of the typical conditions for growing the potato plant, the impact of environmental indicators may be evaluated. The ideal temperature for potato plant development is 20 degrees Celsius [8], while in our region, temperatures throughout the winter months of November through February often hover around 18 degrees. Because of this, the majority of the potato crop in Bangladesh is grown during the winter. In addition, a slight increase in wintertime temperatures will bring potatoes closer to their optimal thermal condition, increasing productivity and correlating with the results of our study. However, according to the Bangladesh Agrometeorological Information portal, both too high and excessively low temperatures harm sprouting as well as the tubers [30]. As the average maximum temperature of Bangladesh in the winter season is below the standard threshold, the model shows the increase of yield as the raise of temperature. Researchers highlighted that dry soil can significantly reduce potato yield or even kill the plant [31]. Although the potato plant needs relatively little water to develop, it does need it for the plant to flourish. Similar inferences can be made from our study on average rainfall and its mild influence on crop productivity. Only 2 to 4 percent of the yearly rainfall falls during the winter, making it an especially dry season. Researchers pointed out that a dry period and a slight increase in temperature above the margin may have a major influence on the yields of potato tubers [32].

The northeastern region has less sunshine and a lower average temperature than the southwest zone which further illustrates the impact of regional variation in the environment. In addition, there is no production-based geographical fluctuation in the humidity or wind speed. The north and sections of the northeast and northwest of the country are fairly high from the sea level, therefore the weather changes more drastically there than it does elsewhere. Differences in total production are also brought about by these kinds of regional variations in the weather as the temperature is one of the key factors for potatoes tuber which mostly matches with the findings of others [33]. Researchers highlighted that Bangladesh’s potato output is influenced by temperature, and the summer months may not be ideal for the irrigation of potatoes due to the high temperatures [34].

Findings revealed that temperature and humidity are significant and it is supported by another study [33]. Insufficient cumulative temperature over the shorter growing periods impacted the growth and yield of potatoes [13]. The ANOVA model and the AR model both demonstrate significant results for the geographical and temporal correlations that have been examined. Although the spatial correlation is larger than the temporal correlation, it is too high for the temporal correlation in the AR model compared with the ANOVA model. This shows that spatiotemporal modeling is valuable for the research. An earlier study noted that the yield of potatoes may be impacted by regional heterogeneity [19]. Commercially viable potato production is influenced by the regional and temporal diversity of soils and agroclimate, as well as the accessibility of water supplies when supplemental irrigation is necessary [35] which quite matches our findings.

The humidity and sunshine is showing a significant negative relationship with the potato yield as the standard relative humidity is below 85% [36] and 6 hours of sunlight. Additionally, Bangladesh’s average relative humidity is 78 percent while potatoes are being harvested, meaning that an increase in relative humidity will lower output. In a similar vein, the average amount of sunshine each day in winter is 6.69 hours [37], which is likewise longer than the standard solar time Therefore, productivity was adversely affected by the sun and humidity according to our chosen model.

Conclusion

The main goal of this research was to determine the factors that affect potato production differently at different periods and regions. Additionally, the authors were keen to investigate how climate variables, such as climate change, affected potato production. The Spatial-temporal model was used to fulfil the objectives of the study in a Bayesian setting. Findings of Bayesian model selection criteria revealed that the Spatial-temporal ANOVA model is more appropriate than other models considered in this study and it has a satisfactory level of convergences on MCMC. Windspeed seems to have no significant influence on potato production, however, temperature, humidity, rainfall, and sunshine have a significant impact on potato production in Bangladesh. The regional variability is more strongly correlated with the production rate than the temporal variation. The authors believed that the findings will be helpful to the policymakers and/or farmers and it is recommended to consider the environmental indicators for potato farming in Bangladesh. Furthermore, the authors are hopeful that the findings will be motivated the researchers who are examining how various climate factors affect different agricultural crop’s yields around the world.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the academic editor and two reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions that help to enhance the manuscript’s quality.

Data Availability

This study is based on the secondary data that is freely available in the websites of the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (http://bbs.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/bbs.portal.gov.bd/page/b343a8b4_956b_45ca_872f_4cf9b2f1a6e0/45%20years%20Major%20Crops.pdf) and Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (https://bbs.portal.gov.bd/site/page/453af260-6aea-4331-b4a5-7b66fe63ba61/-).

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Azimuddin M, Alam QM, Baset MA. Potato for Food Security in Bangladesh. Int J Sustain Crop Prod. 2009;4: 94–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sultana S, Hossain MM, Hossain MI. Efficiency of Potato Farming in Bangladesh: Cobb-Douglas Stochastic Frontier Approach. Jahangirnagar Univ J Stat Stud. 2022;36: 77–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jennings SA, Koehler AK, Nicklin KJ, Deva C, Sait SM, Challinor AJ. Global Potato Yields Increase Under Climate Change With Adaptation and CO2 Fertilisation. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2020;4: 248. doi: 10.3389/FSUFS.2020.519324/BIBTEX [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Raza A, Razzaq A, Mehmood SS, Zou X, Zhang X, Lv Y, et al. Impact of Climate Change on Crops Adaptation and Strategies to Tackle Its Outcome: A Review. Plants. 2019;8: 34. doi: 10.3390/plants8020034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Marjan N, Hossain MM. Effects of Climate Variable on Aus Rice Production at Selected Districts of Bangladesh. Jahangirnagar Univ J Sci. 2018;41: 87–102. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Srivastava A, Chakravarty NVK, Sharma P, Bhagavati G, Prasad R, Gupta V, et al. Relation of Growing Degree-days with Plant Growth and Yield in Mustard Varieties Grown under a Semi-arid Environment. J Agric Phys. 2005;5: 23–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Griggs DJ, Noguer M. Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Weather. 2002;57: 267–269. doi: 10.1256/004316502320517344 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rykaczewska K. The Effect of High Temperature Occurring in Subsequent Stages of Plant Development on Potato Yield and Tuber Physiological Defects. Am J Potato Res. 2015;92: 339–349. doi: 10.1007/S12230-015-9436-X/TABLES/11 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li H, Luo W, Ji R, Xu Y, Xu G, Qiu S, et al. A comparative proteomic study of cold responses in potato leaves. Heliyon. 2021;7: e06002. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Collins M, Barreiro M, Frölicher T, Kang SM, Ashok K, Roxy MK, et al. Frontiers in Climate Predictions and Projections. Front Clim. 2020;2: 571245. doi: 10.3389/FCLIM.2020.571245/BIBTEX [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ray DK, West PC, Clark M, Gerber JS, Prishchepov A V, Chatterjee S. Climate change has likely already affected global food production. PLoS One. 2019;14: e0217148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Senapati MR, Behera B, Mishra SR, Senapati MR. Impact of Climate Change on Indian Agriculture & Its Mitigating Priorities. Am J Environ Prot. 2013;1: 109–111. doi: 10.12691/ENV-1-4-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ling Wang C, He Shen S, Yu Zhang S, Zhen Li Q, Bi Yao Y. Adaptation of potato production to climate change by optimizing sowing date in the Loess Plateau of central Gansu, China. J Integr Agric. 2015;14: 398–409. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60783-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xiao G, Zheng F, Qiu Z, Yao Y. Impact of climate change on water use efficiency by wheat, potato and corn in semiarid areas of China. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2013;181: 108–114. doi: 10.1016/J.AGEE.2013.09.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Olesen JE, Bindi M. Consequences of climate change for European agricultural productivity, land use and policy. Eur J Agron. 2002;16: 239–262. doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00004-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Eitzinger J, Orlandini S, Stefanski R, Naylor REL. Climate change and agriculture: introductory editorial. J Agric Sci. 2010;148: 499–500. doi: 10.1017/S0021859610000481 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhao J, Zhang Y, Qian Y, Pan Z, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, et al. Coincidence of variation in potato yield and climate in northern China. Sci Total Environ. 2016;573: 965–973. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pulatov B, Linderson ML, Hall K, Jönsson AM. Modeling climate change impact on potato crop phenology, and risk of frost damage and heat stress in northern Europe. Agric For Meteorol. 2015;214–215: 281–292. doi: 10.1016/J.AGRFORMET.2015.08.266 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Raymundo R, Asseng S, Robertson R, Petsakos A, Hoogenboom G, Quiroz R, et al. Climate change impact on global potato production. Eur J Agron. 2018;100: 87–98. doi: 10.1016/J.EJA.2017.11.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li Q, Zhang S. Impacts of Recent Climate Change on Potato Yields at a Provincial Scale in Northwest China. Agronomy. 2020;10: 426. doi: 10.3390/AGRONOMY10030426 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Banholzer S, Kossin J, Donner S, Banholzer S, Donner S, Kossin J. The Impact of Climate Change on Natural Disasters. In: Zommers Z, Singh A, editors. Reducing Disaster: Early Warning Systems for Climate Change. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 2014. pp. 21–49. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-8598-3_2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ozaki VA, Ghosh SK, Goodwin BK, Shirota R. Spatio-Temporal Modeling of Agricultural Yield Data with an Application to Pricing Crop Insurance Contracts. Am J Agric Econ. 2008;90: 951–961. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01153.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics-2021, 33rd Series. Dhaka, Bangladesh; 2022. Available: http://www.bbs.gov.bd [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC). Climate Information Management System. Database Clim Inf Manag Syst. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC), Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Bangladesh; 2022. Available: http://climate.barcapps.gov.bd/ [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van Der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Statistical Methodol. 2002;64: 583–639. doi: 10.1111/1467-9868.00353 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Watanabe S. Asymptotic Equivalence of Bayes Cross Validation and Widely Applicable Information Criterion in Singular Learning Theory. J Mach Learn Res. 2010;11: 3571–3594. doi: 10.5555/1756006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Knorr-Held L. Bayesian modelling of inseparable space‐time variation in disease risk. Stat Med. 2000;19: 2555–2567. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lee D, Rushworth A, Napier G. Spatio-temporal areal unit modeling in R with conditional autoregressive priors using the CARBayesST package. J Stat Softw. 2018;84: 1–39. doi: 10.18637/JSS.V084.I0930450020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hossain MM, Abdulla F. Forecasting Potato Production in Bangladesh by ARIMA Model. J Adv Stat. 2016;1: 191–198. doi: 10.22606/jas.2016.14002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bangladesh Agro-Meteorological Information Portal. Agro-Meteorological Information Systems Development Project. In: National Agrometeorological Advisory Service Bulletin [Internet]. 2022. [cited 23 Jul 2022]. Available: https://www.bamis.gov.bd/en/bulletin/nation/ [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Karanja AM, Shasanya C, Makokha G. Analysis of Rainfall Variability on Potato Production in Kenya: A Case of Oljoro-orok Division. Asian J Appl Sci. 2011;2: 447–456. Available: https://www.ajouronline.com/index.php/AJAS/article/view/613 [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rymuza K, Radzka E, Lenartowicz T. Effect of weather conditions on early potato yields in east-central Poland. Commun Biometry Crop Sci. 2015;10: 65–72. Available: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20163004610?start=276000 [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jannat A, Ishikawa-Ishiwata Y, Furuya J. Assessing the Impacts of Climate Variations on the Potato Production in Bangladesh: A Supply and Demand Model Approach. Sustainability. 2021;13: 5011. doi: 10.3390/SU13095011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hijmans RJ. The effect of climate change on global potato production. Am J Potato Res. 2003;80: 271–279. doi: 10.1007/BF02855363 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Daccache A, Keay C, Jones RJA, Weatherhead EK, Stalham MA, Knox JW. Climate change and land suitability for potato production in England and Wales: impacts and adaptation. J Agric Sci. 2012;150: 161–177. doi: 10.1017/S0021859611000839 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wheeler RM, Tibbitts TW, Fitzpatrick AH. Potato growth in response to relative humidity. HortScience. 1989;24: 482–484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shariar KF, Ovy EG, Hossainy TA. Closed Environment Design of Solar Collector Trough using Lenses and Reflectors. World Renewable Energy Congress. 2011. pp. 3852–3858. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Moumita Gangopadhyay

19 Sep 2022

PONE-D-22-21496Measuring the Impact of Climate Change on Potato Production in Bangladesh using Bayesian Hierarchical Spatio-temporal ModelingPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hossain,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 03 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Moumita Gangopadhyay

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service. 

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file).

3. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. 

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

4. We note that Figures 1, 3 and 4 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a) You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 1, 3 and 4 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.  

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b) If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/.

Additional Editor Comments:

The manuscript entitled ““Measuring the Impact of Climate Change on Potato Production in Bangladesh using Bayesian Hierarchical Spatio-temporal Modelling” (PONE-D-22-21496)” is very important for potato production. Here the authors given a good impression about the current situation of Measuring the Impact of Climate Change on Potato Production in Bangladesh. The findings revealed that there is a potential impact of climate change on potato production in Bangladesh. Bayesian Spatiotemporal modelling for Linear, ANOVA, and Auto-Regressive models was used to find the best fit compared with the independent Error Bayesian model for statistical analysis. However, the authors need to be focus on the following issues for modification-

1. Some specific previous studies on correlation between climate factors and its effect on potato crop (if available) may be included or mentioned in the introduction part.

2. English should be checked by any native speaker.

3. Modification is required for proper synchronization of figures and legends in journal format.

4. Resolution of the images use here should be increased.

5. Needs clearly defined objectives with proper deliverable outcome in details.

Concerning the above-mentioned issues, I am suggesting that this manuscript can be resubmitted as a major revision to this journal.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1. In line no -53 , the font size has to be rectified.

2. Some specific previous studies on correlation between climate factors and its effect on potato crop ( if available ) may be included or mentioned in the introduction part.

Reviewer #2: The author has given a good impression about the current situation of Measuring the Impact of Climate Change on Potato Production in Bangladesh. The findings revealed that there is a potential impact of climate change on potato production in Bangladesh. Bayesian Spatiotemporal modelling for Linear, ANOVA, and Auto-Regressive models was used to find the best fit compared with the independent Error Bayesian model for statistical analysis.

1. English modification has to be done in proper manner.

2. Ligand should be added in figure 1. Addition of standard deviation should added in Fig 1.

3. Explanation of * should be clearly written as figure ligand in Fig 2.

4. Clarity of the Fig 3 should be increased.

5. Discussion part must be more elaborated.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Arpita Das

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Nov 22;17(11):e0277933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277933.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


4 Oct 2022

Author responses to the review comments:

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the two reviewers and the Academic Editor for their valuable comments. We have considered all the comments made by the reviewers and thoroughly revised and formatted the manuscript accordingly. A detailed response to each of the comments is provided in the table below:

Responses to the Academic Editor comments:

Thank you very much. The required files are submitted through the submission system. We include all required information in the cover letter. Revised texts are in red color.

Responses Journal Requirements:

1. Many thanks. The manuscript is revised according to PLOS ONE’s style. All necessary files are uploaded to the system of the journal. Revised texts are in red color. Page: 1-16

2. Thanks for raising these points. We revised the whole manuscript as per your comments. The whole manuscript is revised in light of grammatical mistakes and typos. A clean version of the manuscript and track changed version is uploaded to the journal system. Revised texts are in red color. Page: 1-16

3. Thanks. We have revised the data availability statement.

This study is based on the secondary data that is freely available in the websites of the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (http://bbs.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/bbs.portal.gov.bd/page/b343a8b4_956b_45ca_872f_4cf9b2f1a6e0/45%20years%20Major%20Crops.pdf) and Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (https://bbs.portal.gov.bd/site/page/453af260-6aea-4331-b4a5-7b66fe63ba61/-).

Revised texts are in red color. Page: 16

4. Thank you very much for your concern on this point. We ensure you that all maps are produced by using R-coding written by authors. All of them are the author’s own work. No maps were taken from any other sources.

Responses to the Additional Editor Comments:

1. Thank you very much. We have revised the Introduction section as per comments. Revised texts are in red color. Page: 2-4

2. Thanks. The whole manuscript is revised to fix grammatical issues and typos. Revised texts are in red color. Page: 1-16

3. Thank you very much. All figures and legends are modified as per requirement. All high resolute figures are uploaded to the journal system. Revised texts are in red color. Page: 7-13

4. Thank you very much for highlighted this point. All high resolute figures are uploaded to the journal system separately.

5. Thanks. We have revised the manuscript and submitted it to the journal system.

Responses to the Reviewer 1 comments:

1. Thank you very much for your comments and feedback. We revise it. Revised texts are in red color. Page: 3

2. Thanks. We appreciate this comment. We have revised the Introduction section as per your comments. Revised texts are in red color.

Page: 2-4

Responses to the Reviewer 2 comments:

1. Thank you very much for your valuable comment and suggestions that help us improve the manuscript's quality. We have revised the manuscript as per your comments. The whole manuscript is revised to fix grammatical issues and typos. Revised texts are in red color.

Page: 1-16

2. Thanks. Actually, we consider the yearly potato production in Bangladesh. It is a single time series data, therefore, we think that to calculate the standard deviation is not possible here. In the left panel of Fig 1, we visualized the total potato production of Bangladesh by a time series plot and in the right panel, we want to show the spatial distribution of the potato production. Revised texts are in red color. Page: 7

3. Thanks. We add the explanation of * in legend of Fig 2. Revised texts are in red color. Page: 8

4. Thank you very much. We appreciate this comment. All high resolute figures are uploaded to the journal system.

5. Thanks. The Discussion section is revised as per your comment. Revised texts are in red color. Page: 13-16

Finally, the revised manuscript has been produced following the valuable comments and suggestions of the reviewers. Once again, we would like to thank the reviewers for their sincere dedication, professional insights, and earnest cooperation in reviewing the manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Moumita Gangopadhyay

1 Nov 2022

PONE-D-22-21496R1Measuring the Impact of Climate Change on Potato Production in Bangladesh using Bayesian Hierarchical Spatial-temporal ModelingPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hossain,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 16 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Moumita Gangopadhyay

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear Sir/Madam

After reevaluating this revised manuscript the following revisions can be taken into consideration-

1. Modifying English Language specially in introduction and conclusion section.

2. Give some justification how this model can be implemented to another agro climatic environment. i.e. Mention global impact of using this model.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Nov 22;17(11):e0277933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277933.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


2 Nov 2022

Dear Moumita Gangopadhyay

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the two reviewers and the Academic Editor for their valuable comments. We have considered all the comments made by the reviewers and thoroughly revised and formatted the manuscript accordingly. A detailed response to each of the comments is provided below.

Response to the Academic Editor comments:

Thank you very much. The required files are submitted through the submission system. We include all required information in the cover letter. Revised texts are in red color.

Response to the Journal Requirements:

Many thanks. We checked all the references and ensure that all of them are complete and correct.

Response to the Additional Editor Comments:

1. Thank you very much. We have revised the Introduction and Conclusion sections as per comments.

Moreover, the whole manuscript is revised to fix grammatical issues and typos. Revised texts are in red color.

Page: 1-13

2. Thanks. We add this in the last part of the Introduction section. Revised texts are in red color.

Page: 4

Thank you very much for your comments and feedback. We already checked all figures using PACE at the time of submission of the revised version of the manuscript (PONE-D-22-21496R1).

Finally, the revised manuscript has been produced following the valuable comments and suggestions of the reviewers. Once again, we would like to thank the reviewers for their sincere dedication, professional insights, and earnest cooperation in reviewing the manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Sathishkumar V E

8 Nov 2022

Measuring the Impact of Climate Change on Potato Production in Bangladesh using Bayesian Hierarchical Spatial-temporal Modeling

PONE-D-22-21496R2

Dear Dr. Hossain,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Sathishkumar V E

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #3: All the comments as mentioned in the last review, now addressed and now the paper stands Accepted with no further revisions.

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: Yes: Usha Moorthy

**********

Acceptance letter

Sathishkumar V E

11 Nov 2022

PONE-D-22-21496R2

Measuring the Impact of Climate Change on Potato Production in Bangladesh using Bayesian Hierarchical Spatial-temporal Modeling

Dear Dr. Hossain:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Sathishkumar V E

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    This study is based on the secondary data that is freely available in the websites of the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (http://bbs.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/bbs.portal.gov.bd/page/b343a8b4_956b_45ca_872f_4cf9b2f1a6e0/45%20years%20Major%20Crops.pdf) and Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (https://bbs.portal.gov.bd/site/page/453af260-6aea-4331-b4a5-7b66fe63ba61/-).


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES