Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Nov 22;17(11):e0278029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278029

Seroprevalence and factors associated with hepatitis B virus exposure in the incarcerated population from southern Brazil

Joelma Goetz de Gois 1,#, Sthefanny Josephine Klein Ottoni Guedes 2,#, Ana Paula Vieira 1,#, Franciele Aní Caovilla Follador 1,#, Luís Fernando Dip 3,#, Léia Carolina Lucio 3,#, Kérley Braga Pereira Bento Casaril 3,#, Paulo Cezar Nunes Fortes 3,#, Valdir Spada Júnior 3,#, Guilherme Welter Wendt 3,#, Lirane Elize Defante Ferreto 1,3,*,#
Editor: Jason T Blackard4
PMCID: PMC9681091  PMID: 36413542

Abstract

Hepatitis B viral infection (HBV) in prisons poses serious public health challenges because it significantly contributes to the increase in both morbidity and mortality indicators worldwide. Research has shown high HBV prevalence among inmates when compared to the general population. In this study, we estimated the prevalence of HBV exposure and its risk factors among 1,132 inmates detained in high security institutions. A cross-sectional, epidemiological study was carried out in 11 male-only prisons in the State of Paraná, Brazil, between May 2015 to December 2016. HBV exposure was explored using a variety of methods, including HBsAg, anti-HBs, and total anti-HBc. Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate techniques. The overall prevalence of HBV exposure was 11.9% (95% CI: 10.9–12.8), totaling 135 individuals. In the multivariate analyses, risk factors that remained statistically significant were related to the penitentiary location (Francisco Beltrão; OR = 5.59; 95% CI: 3.32–9.42), age (over 30 years; OR = 5.78; 95% CI: 3.58–9.34), undergoing tattooing procedures in prison (OR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.03–2.60), self-reported sexual activities with a known drug user (OR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.12–2.48) and having a history of previous history of hepatitis B or C infection (OR = 2.62; 95% CI: 1.48–4.64). The findings indicate that public policies–including vaccination, early diagnosis, harm reduction strategies, and adequate treatment–should be designed and delivered in the same way for both the incarcerated and the general population in order to reduce the prevalence of HBV and its associated consequences.

Introduction

Viral hepatitis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality around the globe [1]. Although vaccination campaigns for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection reduced the prevalence and socioeconomic impact of the virus in industrialized countries, evidence obtained via systematic review suggest that about 257 million people are currently living with HBV [2].

Among the numerous infectious diseases, hepatitis B is one of the diseases that contribute significantly to the increase in human morbidity and mortality indicators [3] as well as to elevated socioeconomic impact [4]. It is estimated that 5% of the world population carries HBV; furthermore, approximately one million individuals die from chronic liver disease every year [5, 6].

Prevalence of HBV remain high and in vulnerable groups such as incarcerated populations. Indeed, it is estimated that nearly 10 million individuals are incarcerate worldwide and that about half-million of those (or 4.8% of the global prison population) may be infected with HBV [7].

Research in the Brazilian prison population has shown great variability in the prevalence of HBV, ranging from 3.8% to 54.5% [7–11]. Incarceration increases the risk of HBV infection, especially when associated with structural characteristics of prisons and with the marginalized social position occupied by the population deprived of liberty [5, 9, 12].

The prevalence of HBV as measured by HBsAg in inmates is also highly variable elsewhere. For instance, prevalence and West and Central Africa can be as high as 23.5%; in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, data indicates to a 10.4% prevalence [7]. Lastly, a 5.7% prevalence of HBV is found in East and Southern Africa prisons (5.7%) [7]. These findings are worrying, considering that immunization effectively prevents HBV infection, thus protecting against disability, physical and psychological disorders, and death [13, 14].

Unprotected sexual intercourse, syringe sharing, inadequate access to health services, and tattooing in inappropriate places are important predictors of HBV transmission [15]. Many times, individuals are already admitted to the prison unit carrying the virus [16], and the prison system may act as a hotspot for virus dispersion beyond the incarcerated population [17–19].

According to the 2020 National Survey of Penitentiary Information, Brazil has 702,069 people deprived of liberty in all regimes [20]. Although there are health care policies for this population, practices are still quite incipient. It is reasonable to imply that both the lack of financial and human resources and the lack of understanding regarding the importance of health policies targeting this vulnerable group might favor the spread of infectious diseases in prisons [21]. Thus, this investigation sought to explore the seroprevalence and risk factors associated with HBV exposure among male inmates.

Methods

Study design and setting

The present study is part of a cross-sectional survey conducted from May 2015 to December 2016 in 11 penitentiaries located in the State of Paraná, Brazil. Based on information from the Paraná Penitentiary Department (DEPEN/PR), at the time of the study, there were about 19,000 inmates distributed in 23 closed male penitentiary institutions. Of the 23 high security closed prisons, 11 were included in the larger study and are located in six cities in the state (Francisco Beltrão, Londrina, Curitiba, São José dos Pinhais, Pinhais, and Piraquara). For the present study three cities from the six listed were selected. The choice was based on the population size of the city and on the fact that they have closed penitentiaries in the main city and in metropolitan cities, where the inmate remains every day in the prison unit under supervision.

Participants

Proportional stratified sampling was conducted using each prison as a randomization unit. A total of 1,132 inmates were interviewed with 60 losses or refusals (5%). The sample size was calculated based on an expected prevalence of 50% HBV seroprevalence with a 1% variation, 80% power and 5% alpha error. The total population (8,142 inmates) thus resulted on a minimum sample size of 942 individuals. We added approximately 25% individuals (1,192 inmates) to account possible losses due to refusals to participate in the research.

Procedures

This study was conducted with the approval of the Ethics Committee on Human Research of the Western Paraná State University, under opinion number 810.574. All eligible participants provided written informed consent prior to participation on a voluntary basis and no compensation was provided. The treatment offered to individuals who did or did not participate in the study was the same.

On the day of data collection, inmates were sorted numerically in ascending order from lists provided by the prison. A list of random numbers was generated using Microsoft Excel® 2007 software. To be eligible to participate, individuals had to be (a) 18 years or older, (b) be formally under state custody, (c) be able to consent for themselves, (d) be suitable to be interviewed by one researcher only, and (e) be able to understand spoken Portuguese.

Participants completed a questionnaire with demographic information, time in prison, illicit drug use, self-reported knowledge regarding previous infection with hepatitis B and C, and sexual behavior. Individuals were also asked about their knowledge of the transmission and evolution of diseases such as HIV, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and other sexually transmitted infections. Vaccination status was obtained from medical records in the institutional databases.

Blood samples were collected from each participant. After serological separation, the serum was stored at -20°C. Serum samples were used to detect the following serological markers: HBsAg anti-HBs and total anti-HBc.

To investigate the seroprevalence of HBV antibodies, we used the following procedures: HBsAg qualitative analysis (HBsAg Qualitative II kit, Abbott GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden, Germany), anti-HBs (Anti-HBs kit, Abbott GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden, Germany) and anti-HBc (Anti-hepatitis B core antigen antibody II Assay kit, Abbott GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden, Germany) in serum samples on a i4000 instrument (Architect System, United States of America [USA]). Test results were analyzed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The serological results were delivered individually by the researcher to the research participants. Those with results indicating exposure were referred for specialized follow-up with an infectious diseases doctor within the Public Health System.

Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v. 24 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Chi-square and Fischer’s exact tests were conducted to investigate the association between the studied variables. From univariate analyses, results with a p value of .20 or less were selected for inclusion in further multivariate analyses using unconditional logistic regression.

Results

Participants who presented the following markers were considered to have current or previous HBV infection: HBsAg+ total and Anti-HBc (7 prisoners), Anti-HBc and Anti-HBs (100 prisoners), and Anti-HBs alone (28). Thus, 135 prisoners were positive for one or more markers, representing an overall prevalence of 11.9% (95%CI: 10.0–13.8) (Table 1).

Table 1. Characterization of the sample and seroprevalence of hepatitis B in 11 state penitentiaries in three municipalities of Paraná, Brazil.

Variable Francisco Beltrão (n = 119) Londrina (n = 276) Curitiba (n = 737) Total
Total prevalence 31.1% 10.9% 9.2% 11.9%
Age p < .001 p < .001 p < .001 p < .001
Between 18 and 30 years old 15.6% 2.9% 2.6% 4.1%
More than 30 years old 49.1% 18.7% 16.3% 20.2%
Education p = .565 p = .190 p = .861 p = .190
Incomplete elementary school 33.8% 13.7% 8.9% 13.3%
Complete elementary school 27.1% 8.0% 9.5% 10.6%
Was employed when arrested p = .346 p = .604 p = .555 p = .468
Yes 25.5% 12.0% 8.4% 11.1%
No 35.3% 9.3% 9.9% 12.7%
Number of times in the prison system p = .074 p = .584 p = .639 p = .042
Once 36.5% 12.2% 8.4% 14.2%
Twice 17.6% 9.4% 9.7% 10.1%
Conviction time p = .378 p = .673 p = .903 p = .392
Up to 10 years 26.3% 9.6% 9.5% 11.1%
More than 10 years 35.5% 11.9% 8.9% 12.9%
History of sexually transmitted infection p = .111 p = .262 p = .214 p = .338
Yes 19.4% 14.4% 11.8% 13.4%
No or does not know 36.1% 9.1% 8.4% 11.4%
Got a tattoo in prison p = .179 p = .148 p = .004 p = .001
Yes 23.5% 7.1% 4.6% 7.7%
No 36.8% 13.4% 11.5% 14.3%
Got a piercing in prison p = .741 p = 1.000 p = .863 p = .563
Yes 16.7% 0 b 6.7% 7.7%
No 31.9% 11.0 9.3% 12.1%
Shared objects p = .601 p = .885 p = .345 p = .340
Yes 29.3% 10.5% 8.5% 11.3%
No 37.0% 12.5% 11.0% 13.4%
Knowledge about HIV status p = .004 p = .222 p = .798 p = .038
Yes 23.9% 9.5% 9.4% 10.9%
No 55.6% 16.4% 8.3% 16.3%
Knowledge about hepatitis status p = .153 p = .826 p = 0.174 p = .771
Yes 23.6% 9.6% 11.1 12.4
No 37.5% 11.4% 7.9 11.6
Have participated in a preventive campaign p = .245 p = .829 p = 0.906 p = .946
Yes 50.0% 7.7% 8.9% 12.5%
No 29.0% 11.2% 9.3% 11.9%
Information about hepatitis B transmission and evolution p = .600 p = .555 p = 0.977 p = .362
Yes 32.4% 11.5% 9.2% 12.4%
No 21.4% 6.3% 9.2% 9.6%
Blood transfusion p = .599 p = .863 p = 0.337 p = .482
Yes 44.4% 11.5% 12.4 13.9
No 30.0% 10.7% 8.8 11.6
Sex with a drug user p = .001 p = .698 p = .020 p < .001
Yes 17.5% 10.1% 7.0 8.8%
No 46.4% 12.4% 12.3 16.5%
Has used injection drugs p = .932 p = .973 p = .838 p = .982
Yes 33.3% 11.1% 10.5% 11.3%
No 31.0% 10.9% 9.1% 12.0%
Sexual orientation p = .189 p = .763 p = .441 p = .172
Heterosexual 33.3% 10.8% 9.6% 12.7%
Other 9.1% 14.3% 6.3% 7.1%
Homosexual relationship p = .682 p = .938 p = .986 p = .960
Yes 100%a 13.6% 9.3% 12.1%
No 30.5% 10.6% 9.2% 11.9%
Have intimate visitation p = 0.134 p = .215 p = .345 p = .342
Yes 17.9% 7.9% 11.0% 10.5%
No 35.2% 13.3% 8.5% 12.6%
Condom distribution in prison p = 0.941 p = .337 p = .086 p = .965
Yes 29.5% 9.1% 11.3% 12.1%
No or does not know 32.0% 13.5% 7.3% 11.8%
Use of alcoholic beverage p = 0.139 p = .541 p = .309 p = .051
Yes 29.2 10.3% 8.9% 11.4%
No 66.7 16.7% 15.0% 20.0%
Ever had hepatitis (B or C) p = 0.069 p = .670 p = .002 p < .001
Yes 58.3 16.7% 21.3% 25.3%
No 28.0 10.5% 8.1% 10.8%
Had hepatitis B vaccine p = .115 p = .249 p = .238 p = .977
Yes 40.4% 6.7% 6.9% 11.7%
No 25.0% 12.4% 10.1% 12.0%

Data are expressed as percentages (%). P values were obtained using the Chi-Squared test.

a Only one subject in the cell.

b No subjects in the cell.

The seroprevalence was approximately three times higher in Francisco Beltrão than in the other places of data collection. In all municipalities, a higher seroprevalence of HBV was observed among people over 30 years old. Only in Francisco Beltrão there was a higher prevalence observed among individuals who reported having no knowledge about HIV.

The main factors associated with hepatitis B were: age, having only one passage through the prison system, getting a tattoo in prison, and having reported any previous history of hepatitis B and C infection. After inserting these variables in the multivariable model, it was observed that inmates from Francisco Beltrão and individuals older than 30 years had an OR higher than five for HBV seroprevalence compared to Curitiba and younger individuals, respectively. The other risk factors that remained statistically significant were having already had hepatitis B or C, not having tattoos, and not using illicit drugs, presenting approximately twice the OR compared to their peers (Table 2).

Table 2. Factors associated with hepatitis B seroprevalence in eleven state penitentiaries in three cities of Paraná, Brazil.

Independent variable OR (95% CI) p ORAJ (95% CI) p
Location
Francisco Beltrão 4.43 (2.80–7.04) < .001 5.59 (3.32–9.42) < .001
Londrina 1.20 (.76–1.89) .431 --- ---
Curitiba 1 1
Age
Between 18 and 30 years old 1
More than 30 years old 5.88 (3.72–9.30) < .001 5.78 (3.58–9.34) < .001
Education
Incomplete Elementary School 1
Complete Elementary School .77 (.54–1.11) .161 --- ---
Knowledge about HIV status
Yes 1
No 1.59 (1.05–2.41) .030 --- ---
Sexual orientation
Heterosexual 1 .132
Other 1.54 (.25–1.20) --- ---
Use of alcoholic beverage
Yes 1 .034
No 1.94 (1.05–3.60) --- ---
Number of times in the prison system
Once 1
Twice .68 (.47 –.68) .034 --- ---
Got a tattoo in prison
Yes 1 1
No 2.01 (1.32–3.06) .001 1.64 (1.03–2.60) .037
Sex with a drug user
No 1 1
Yes 2.04 (1.42–2.93) < .001 1.67 (1.12–2.48) .013
Ever had hepatitis (B and/or C)
Yes 2.81 (1.68–4.68) < .001 2.62 (1.48–4.64) .001
No 1 1

ORADJ (95%CI) values are presented only for the variables that made up the final model.

Discussion

HBV can cause acute or chronic hepatitis, which could potentially develop into cirrhosis of the liver, liver cancer and, therefore, leading to death. HBV infection can go undetected for many years as the onset of the disease and initial developments of liver damage are often asymptomatic. It is estimated that a high percentage of the population is infected and undiagnosed, which contributes to the spread of the disease and poor prognosis [22]. Moreover, there is a higher risk of HBV transmission in prison settings due to a lack of knowledge about the forms of viral transmission, repeated and unprotected sexual intercourse, high proportion of injecting drug users (IDU), and practices involving tattooing and piercing [23]. Moreover, both social and individual vulnerability suffered by population in prisons can also increase the risk of HBV transmission. After leaving prison, individuals are also at higher risk for HBV infection [7, 14, 24–30]. In this study, the goal was to estimate the prevalence of HBV infection and its risk factors among 1,132 Brazilian inmates, all detained in high security institutions. Consequently, prisons are considered reservoirs of various infectious agents, representing a high-risk environment for the transmission and expansion of emergency/emerged diseases for public health [18, 19].

In the current study, it was observed a prevalence of hepatitis B three times higher in the municipality of Francisco Beltrão when compared to the other municipalities. This finding is consistent with the data from the Health Secretary of Paraná (2018) because the western region of the state ranks higher in the number of hepatitis B cases [29]. In addition, it should be considered that the coverage and uptake of HBV vaccination varies substantially by geographic region and prison category [30].

Still regarding the municipality of Francisco Beltrão, a higher seroprevalence of HBV was found among individuals who showed no knowledge about HIV. This lack of knowledge is alarming since people living with HIV and people in prison are high risk groups for HBV infections [22]. Thus, it is reasonable to infer that the current educational programs aiming to prevent HBV are insufficient. Comprehensive programs are needed, including particularly components addressing inmates concerns [18]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has highlighted the importance of blood screening for the virus and subsequent anti-HBV immunization in the prison population. representing an opportunity to prevent viral infection in a highly vulnerable, at-risk population [19].

Furthermore, our study found that HBV prevalence was higher among those aged 30 years or more. For the municipality of Francisco Beltrão, this chance increased more than five times for hepatitis B compared to the capital (Curitiba) and in comparison to younger inmates. In the literature, few studies are available that have reported age-specific prevalence for HBV [31]. Nonetheless, a study conducted in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, reported a significant, positive association of anti-HBc prevalence and age [9]. In this respect, age may be understood as a variable of lifetime exposure, thus indicating cumulative risks for HBV infection [9, 32]. Another important point that may be related to age is the absence of vaccines until 1998, when three-dose hepatitis B immunization became available in the public health network.

A significant relationship between previous incarceration history and HBV infection was also found. This association has been mentioned previously, albeit the mechanisms are not yet fully explained [33, 34]. In this sense. further research is needed to clarify the relationship between arrest and anti-HBc positivity [34].

Regarding IDU, the present study found a higher prevalence of HBV exposure in individuals who do not inject drugs. Indeed, the most reported form of HBV transmission is sexual, followed by vertical transmission [35]. Vertical transmission is a frequent cause of HBV spread in regions of high endemicity. In the state of Paraná, higher number of cases are found in the western and southwestern regions, comprising the regions of Pato Branco, Francisco Beltrão, Foz do Iguaçu, Cascavel, and Toledo [29]. Nonetheless, the higher prevalence of HBV infection found in individuals who do not inject drugs might seem contradictory given that inmates are at higher risk of contracting blood-borne viruses (BBV) as a result of high levels of involvement with IDU [32]. However, a cohort investigation conducted in Sri Lanka found no relationship between these infections and intravenous drug use [36]. In addition, a recent Scottish study showed very promising results in which HBV vaccination was associated with reduced chances of infection among IDU [37].

Similarly, there is evidence that tattooing is one the key risk factors for blood-borne diseases. In the prison environment, tattoos are performed using non-sterilized equipment that are also shared between inmates [38]. Although this study found lower prevalence of HBV in individuals who do not have tattoos, it is essential to pursue universal immunization against hepatitis B and support educational activities focusing on inmates’ health in conjunction with rigorous, safer tattooing practices in prison to prevent hepatitis B transmission [39].

In summary, data gathered in the current investigation indicates that inmates are at high risk of HBV infection due to social and environmental risk factors, such as intravenous drug use, unprotected sex, tattooing, restricted space, and overcrowding. Thus, preventive vaccination efforts can be both a challenge and an opportunity. Individuals who would not have access to health services in the community can be reached and followed for a period of time during incarceration [2, 19, 40].

The influx of people between prisons and the community—staff and inmates—means that undiagnosed and untreated infections in prisons reflect and amplify the prevalence of infection in surrounding communities [7, 18]. This extent varies across settings depending on incarceration rates, criminal justice responses to drug use and sexual behavior in the community and in prison, the prevalence of infection, and risky behaviors in prison settings [41]. It must be emphasized that treatment of chronic hepatitis B is highly effective and leads to viral suppression in 90% of cases [42]. Thus, accelerated hepatitis B immunization schedules could result in rapid seroconversion for short-term, early protection for susceptible patients. Furthermore, collaboration should be sought among public health officials, physicians and correctional authorities to implement screening and vaccination programs in individuals at high risk for HBV infection to limit the spread of the disease [19].

Finally, it seems important to highlight that this study contains some important limitations, including the nature of its design that impeded the establishment of casual links between the variables analyzed. Additionally, the lack of both HBV DNA and HBeAg testing represents another weakness of the study, which might encourage future researchers to address the issue in order to advance the understanding of the prevalence of HBV in prisons and its associated risk factors.

Conclusions

The data from this study demonstrate that there is a high seroprevalence of HBV exposure in the prison environment, particularly among inmates presenting with factors associated with hepatitis B virus exposure. Furthermore, there is evidence that current efforts to prevent infectious diseases in prisons are insufficient. Hence, it is essential to expand testing procedures to identify inmates in the need of professional care. Educational programs and widespread immunization campaigns are needed to contain the spread hepatitis B virus within prisons.

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly because of the National Health Council Resolution number 466 (http://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2012/Reso466.pdf), - items “II.25”, “III 1 q”, and “IV.3 e”. The resolution states that researchers could solely use and share the material and data obtained in the research exclusively according to the consent of the participants and/or partner institutions. At the time of data collection, participants were not asked to consent that their data could be shared. As such, any further use and/or sharing of data must be approved beforehand by contacting the Western Paraná State University Institutional Ethics Committee via e-mail (cep.prppg@unioeste.br) or telephone +(5545 3220-3056).

Funding Statement

albeit we did receive funding for the research (Brazilian Ministry of Health [Ministério da Saúde -BR; grant 797322/2013], the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Steffen G, Sperle I, Leendertz SA, Sarma N, Beermann S, Thamm R, et al. The epidemiology of Hepatitis B, C and D in Germany: A scoping review. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(3), e0229166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization. Hepatitis B. In: World Health Organization [Internet]. [cited 28 Oct 2022]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-b
  • 3.Meireles LC. Three decades of hepatitis B control with vaccination. World J Hepatol. 2015;7(18): 2127–2132. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i18.2127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Romano L, Paladini S, Van Damme P, Zanetti AR. The worldwide impact of vaccination on the control and protection of viral hepatitis B. Dig Liver Dis. 2011;43: S2–S7. doi: 10.1016/S1590-8658(10)60685-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dana D, Zary N, Peyman A, Behrooz A. Risk Prison and Hepatitis B Virus Infection among Inmates with History of Drug Injection in Isfahan, Iran. Sci World J. 2013;2013: 1–4. doi: 10.1155/2013/735761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Khajedaluee M, Babaei A, Vakili R, Valizade N, Homaei Shandiz F, Alavian SM, et al. Sero-Prevalence of Bloodborne Tumor Viruses (HCV, HBV, HTLV-I and KSHV Infections) and Related Risk Factors among Prisoners in Razavi Khorasan Province, Iran, in 2008. Hepat Mon. 2016;16(12): e31541. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.31541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dolan K, Wirtz AL, Moazen B, Ndeffo-mbah M, Galvani A, Kinner SA, et al. Global burden of HIV, viral hepatitis, and tuberculosis in prisoners and detainees. Lancet. 2016;388(10049): 1089–1102. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30466-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Coelho HC, Oliveira SAN de, Miguel JC, Oliveira M de LA, Figueiredo JF de C, Perdoná GC, et al. Predictive markers for hepatitis C virus infection among Brazilian inmates. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2009;42(4): 369–372. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86822009000400002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stief ACF, Martins RMB, Andrade SMO de, Pompilio MA, Fernandes SM, Murat PG, et al. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus infection and associated factors among prison inmates in state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2010;43(5): 512–515. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86822010000500008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.El Maerrawi I, Carvalho HB. Prevalence and risk factors associated with HIV infection, hepatitis and syphilis in a state prison of São Paulo. Int J STD AIDS. 2015;26(2): 120–127. doi: 10.1177/0956462414531242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Silva AA de S, Araújo TME de, Teles SA, Magalhães R de LB, Andrade ELR. Prevalência de hepatite B e fatores associados em internos de sistema prisional. Acta Paul Enferm. 2017;30(1): 66–72. doi: 10.1590/1982-0194201700010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gois SM, Santos Junior HP de O, Silveira M de F de A, Gaudêncio MM de P. Para além das grades e punições: uma revisão sistemática sobre a saúde penitenciária. Cienc Saude Colet. 2012;17(5): 1235–1246. doi: 10.1590/S1413-81232012000500017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Adjei AA, Armah HB, Gbagbo F, Ampofo WK, Quaye IKE, Hesse IFA, et al. Prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus and syphilis among prison inmates and officers at Nsawam and Accra, Ghana. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55(5): 593–597. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46414-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hu YC, Yeh CC, Chen RY, Su CT, Wang WC, Bai CH, et al. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus in Taiwan 30 years after the commencement of the national vaccination program. PeerJ. 2018;6: e4297. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Iglecias LMM, Puga M M, Pompílio MA, Teles SA, Croda J, Lima LA, et al. Epidemiological study of hepatitis B virus among prisoners with active tuberculosis in Central Brazil. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016;20(11): 1509–1515. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Barros LAS, Pessoni GC, Teles SA, Souza SMB de, Matos MA de, Martins RMB, et al. Epidemiology of the viral hepatitis B and C in female prisoners of Metropolitan Regional Prison Complex in the State of Goiás, Central Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2013;46(1): 24–29. doi: 10.1590/0037-868216972013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sinisgalli E, Silvestri C, Bravi S, Ceccherini V, Tanini T, Bonaccorsi G, et al. Infectious diseases in the Tuscan detention setting: data from the Health Agency of Tuscany. Public Health. 2016;141: 264–267. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.02.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kamarulzaman A, Reid SE, Schwitters A, Wiessing L, El-Bassel N, Dolan K, et al. Prevention of transmission of HIV, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and tuberculosis in prisoners. Lancet. 2016;388(10049): 1115–1126. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30769-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stasi C, Silvestri C, Voller F. Emerging Trends in Epidemiology of Hepatitis B Virus Infection. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2017;5(3): 272–276. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2017.00010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Boletim Epidemiológico HIV/Aids 2020. In: Departamento de Doenças de Condições Crônicas e Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis [Internet]. [cited 28 Oct 2022]. Available: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/boletins/epidemiologicos/especiais/2020/boletim-hiv_aids-2020-internet.pdf
  • 21.Albuquerque ACC de, Silva DM da, Rabelo DCC, Lucena WAT de, Lima PCS de, Coelho MRCD, et al. Soroprevalência e fatores associados ao Vírus da Imunodeficiência Humana (HIV) e sífilis em presidiários do Estado de Pernambuco, Brasil. Cienc Saude Colet. 2014;19(7): 2125–2132. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232014197.08602013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mason LM, Duffell E, Veldhuijzen IK, Petriti U, Bunge EM, Tavoschi L. Hepatitis B and C prevalence and incidence in key population groups with multiple risk factors in the EU/EEA: a systematic review. Euro Surveill. 2019;24(30): pii = 1800614. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.30.1800614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gétaz L, Casillas A, Siegrist CA, Chappuis F, Togni G, Tran NT, et al. Hepatitis B prevalence, risk factors, infection awareness and disease knowledge among inmates: a cross-sectional study in Switzerland’s largest pre-trial prison. J Glob Health. 2018;8(2): 020407. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.020407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kose S, Adar P, Gozaydin A, Kuzucu L, Akkoclu G. Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C in prisons: a prevalence study. Int J Prison Health. 2019;15(2): 162–167. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-01-2018-0004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Adams LM, Kendall S, Smith A, Quigley E, Stuewig JB, Tangney JP. HIV Risk behaviors of male and female jail inmates prior to incarceration and one year post-release. AIDS Behav. 2013;17: 2685–2694. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-9990-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dolan K, Moazen B, Noori A, Rahimzadeh S, Farzadfar F, Hariga F. People who inject drugs in prison: HIV prevalence, transmission and prevention. Int J Drug Policy. 2015;26: S12–S15. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.10.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Onofre EMC, Julião EF. A educação na prisão como política pública: entre desafios e tarefas. Educ Real. 2013;38(1): 51–69. doi: 10.1590/S2175-62362013000100005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Prasetyo AA, Dirgahayu P, Sari Y, Hudiyono H, Kageyama S. Molecular epidemiology of HIV, HBV, HCV, and HTLV-1/2 in drug abuser inmates in central Javan prisons, Indonesia. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2013;7(6): 453–467. doi: 10.3855/jidc.2965 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Boletim Epidemiológico de Hepatites Virais—2018. In: Departamento de Doenças de Condições Crônicas e Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis [Internet]. [cited 28 Oct 2022]. Available: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/boletim_epidemiologico/hepatites_virais_2018.pdf
  • 30.Vicente-Alcalde N, Ruescas-Escolano E, Harboe ZB, Tuells J. Vaccination coverage among prisoners: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(20): 7589. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kinner SA, Snow K, Wirtz AL, Altice FL, Beyrer C, Dolan K. Age-specific global prevalence of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV, and tuberculosis among incarcerated people: a systematic review. J Adolesc Health. 2018;62(3S): S18–S26. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.09.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Coles T, Simpson P, Saulo D, Kaldor J, Richards A, Levy M, et al. Trends in hepatitis B prevalence and associated risk factors among Indigenous and non-Indigenous prison entrants in Australia, 2004 to 2013. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019;43(3): 236–240. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Butler T, Spencer J, Cui J, Vickery K, Zou J, Kaldor J. Seroprevalence of markers for hepatitis B, C and G in male and female prisoners-NSW, 1996. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999;23(4): 377–384. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1999.tb01278.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shirani K, Nokhodian Z, Kassaian N, Adibi P, Naeini AE, Ataei B. The prevalence of isolated hepatitis B core antibody and its related risk factors among male injected drug users in Isfahan prisons. Adv Biomed Res. 2015;4:17. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.148675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fernandes CN da S, Alves M de M, Souza ML de, Machado GA, Couto G, Evangelista RA. Prevalence of hepatitis B and C seropositivity in pregnant women. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2014;48(1): 89–96. doi: 10.1590/S0080-623420140000100011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Niriella MA, Hapangama A, Luke HPDP, Pathmeswaran A, Kuruppuarachchi K a. LA, de Silva HJ. Prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C infections and their relationship to injectable drug use in a cohort of Sri Lankan prison inmates. Ceylon Med J. 2015;60(1):18–20. doi: 10.4038/cmj.v60i1.7288 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Palmateer NE, Goldberg DJ, Munro A, Taylor A, Yeung A, Wallace LA, et al. Association between universal hepatitis B prison vaccination, vaccine uptake and hepatitis B infection among people who inject drugs. Addict. 2018;113(1): 80–90. doi: 10.1111/add.13944 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jafari S, Moradi G, Zareie B, Gouya MM, Zavareh FA, Ghaderi E. Tattooing among Iranian prisoners: results of the two national biobehavioral surveillance surveys in 2015–2016. An Bras Dermatol. 2020;95(3): 289–297. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2019.11.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jafari S, Buxton JA, Afshar K, Copes R, Baharlou S. Tattooing and risk of hepatitis B: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Public Health. 2012;103(3): 207–212. doi: 10.1007/BF03403814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Stasi C, Silvestri C, Fanti E, Di Fiandra T, Voller F. Prevalence and features of chronic viral hepatitis and HIV coinfection in Italian prisons. Eur J Intern Med. 2016;34: e21–e22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.04.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Moazen B, Saeedi Moghaddam S, Silbernagl MA, Lotfizadeh M, Bosworth RJ, Alammehrjerdi Z, et al. Prevalence of drug injection, sexual activity, tattooing, and piercing among prison inmates. Epidemiol Rev. 2018;40(1): 58–69. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxy002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.European Association for The Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2012;57(1): 167–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Jason T Blackard

5 Jun 2022

PONE-D-22-06352Seroprevalence and factors associated with hepatitis B virus infection in incarcerated population from southern BrazilPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Ferreto,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 20 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jason T. Blackard, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

This is a cross-sectional study of HBV in incarcerated persons in southern Brazil.

Prison populations are poorly studied but likely contribute a significant burden of HBV; thus, studies such as this are relevant.  The overall prevalence was high at 11.9%, although other findings are expected, and the methods are quite standard for an epidemiologic study.

There are multiple awkward phrases.  The manuscript should be reviewed carefully by a native English speaker and/or a professional editing service.

Line 136:  AIDS should be listed as HIV.

Line 158:  does “having already had hepatitis” mean that they knew they had HBV already, had HBV previously and clearly it and now have HBV again, or had HCV previously/currently?  The meaning must be clarified here and elsewhere in the manuscript.

For Tables 1 and 2:  How was knowledge about HIV or hepatitis assesses?  No information is provided in the methods.

In Tables 1 and 2:  what does “ever had hepatitis” refer to?  HBV or HCV or both?

How was HBV vaccination status determined?

Limitations are not listed but include the lack of HBV DNA testing and lack of HBeAg testing.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: - The authors should have a look at the statistical analysis package versions that they have included, they differ in the same paragraph Line 145 and Line 148.

- Furthermore, Table 1: The authors should indicate that they have reported percentages

Reviewer #2: The authors determined HBsAg, anti-HBs and total anti-HBc in incarcerated individuals in three settings with the intention of determining the seroprevalence and risk factors. The data presented however does not seem complete because only HBsAg seroprevalence is reported but there is no comment on anti-HBs and total anti-HBc. Also, numbers enrolled in the three sites needs a bit more detail as to how they were enrolled (What was the total number in each setting). The outcomes of the statistical analysis in the tales 1 is confusing as a p-value has been assigned to each column. Were the three columns being compared? Don't we need just one p-value? Hepatitis B infection seems to be defined as the presence of HBsAg so this should reflect in the entire manuscript and must be distinguished from the disease e.g. lines 199-120. The authors must make reference to the tables as they describe the results.

The authors must also shorten the discussion

Below are a few minor comments:

1. Line 81: sentence ends with "and"

2. Line 98: delete sentence beginning with "it is.........."

3. Line 108 following: just make reference to the study (delete the title quoted)

4. Line 133: what intervention are the authors referring to?

5. Line 138: was it serum or plasma or both?

6. Lines 140-143: the authors need to present the name of the assay, the company, the city and country in which it was manufactured

7. Line 141: which lab are the authors refering to? Either they delete or provide the name of the lab.

8. Line 148: Provide the company, the city and country in which it was manufactured

9. Line 262: Delete, "At this juncture"

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Nov 22;17(11):e0278029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278029.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


4 Sep 2022

The editorial team required one action from our part, namely: to draft a short summary of the restrictions regarding data sharing (it can be about a paragraph long). We included this information in the last submission. Hence, it remains unclear to us if Plos One wants this information to be included in the article or if this information must appear in the Data Availability Statement. Anyhow, we perfected the previous summary explaining the reasons behind the restrictions for sharing this dataset. We also added this information under the “Data Availability Statement” section in the online submission system. The new summary now reads as:

Data cannot be shared publicly because of the National Health Council Resolution number 466 (http://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2012/Reso466.pdf), - items “II.25”, “III 1 q”, and “IV.3 e”. The resolution states that researchers could solely use and share the material and data obtained in the research exclusively according to the consent of the participants and/or partner institutions. At the time of data collection, participants were not asked to consent that their data could be shared. As such, any further use and/or sharing of data must be approved beforehand by contacting the Western Paraná State University Institutional Ethics Committee (e-mail cep.prppg@unioeste.br; Telephone +5545 3220-3056).

Decision Letter 1

Jason T Blackard

19 Oct 2022

PONE-D-22-06352R1Seroprevalence and factors associated with hepatitis B virus infection in the incarcerated population from southern BrazilPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Defante Ferreto,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please make the minor revisions suggested by both reviewers prior to acceptance of your manuscript.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 03 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jason T. Blackard, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Please make the minor revisions suggested by both reviewers prior to acceptance of your manuscript.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have satisfactorily addressed all the reviewer's comments and no further revisions. The editor should correct the typographical error on the abstract -Line 10 because it looks like a word is missing. Otherwise, the manuscript should be accepted for publication in PlosOne.

Reviewer #2: Few concerns:

1. The introduction is too long. Lines 90-115, 116-127 may be shortened and portions used while discussing the results. For examples, lines 260 to 266 seems to be a repetition of part of 104-115.

2. I think a better title will be "exposure" not "infection" with HBV. anyone with anti-HBs has recovered so cannot be infected. (see also line 182; antigens were also tested for)

3. Line 250 HBV includes virus (saying HBV virus is therefore a repetition)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Professor Kwamena William Sagoe

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Nov 22;17(11):e0278029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278029.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


4 Nov 2022

We are pleased to send you the requested information regarding the “PONE-D-22-06352” in this new cover letter. In summary, we were asked to perform minor reviews that are detailed below. We would like to anticipate that all the suggestions were accepted.

1st request (Editor).

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Response to the 1st request.

Dear Dr. Jason, we revised all the references. There were no retracted papers cited in our study, only two references in which there were errors regarding authorship naming (i.e., Refence number 14 and Reference number 32) and one correction (errata) for Reference number 35.

As references 14 and 32 were already cited correctly, we kept these in the text. However, considering that reference number 35 contained substantial corrections, it is somewhat “old” and does not add significant evidence to our manuscript, we decided to exclude it.

We adjusted the citations in our text, and you can clearly see the changes in the file “Revised Manuscript with Track Changes”. Hyperlinks were all checked and minor corrections were performed in the reference list.

For your information, here are the reasons given by the authors for their corrections (ref. 14 and 32) and for the errata (ref. 35).

Reference 14:

February 27, 2019: Minor Correction: Fu Hsiung Su's affiliations of “5, 7, 8, 9” should have included affiliation 3 (Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan). In the Funding and Grant Disclosures, “Taipei Medical Hospital” should have been “Taipei Medical University Hospital”.

Link: https://peerj.com/articles/4297/

Reference 32:

Correction added on 2 April 2019, after first online publication: This article has been updated to correct the name of the author from ‘John Kaldo’ to ‘John Kaldor’. The second line of the ‘Results’ section of the Abstract has also been corrected to read ‘Hepatitis B’ instead of ‘Hepatitis C’, as indicated by the symbol ᶺ.

Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1753-6405.12870

Reference 35 (excluded in the revised manuscript):

In the MMWR Recommendations and Reports, "Prevention and Control of Infections with Hepatitis Viruses in Correctional Settings," published on January 24, 2003, an error occurred on page 4 in the second sentence of the paragraph under Occupational Exposures. The sentence should read, "Occupational transmission of HBV infection among hospital-based workers has been linked to percutaneous and mucous membrane exposures, and HCV infection has been primarily associated with percutaneous exposure." On page 12, in Box 6, the fourth item under Type of Exposure should read, "Household (e.g., cell or dormitory) contact --- to person with chronic HBV infection." On page 2, errors occurred in Table 1, and on page 20, errors occurred in Table 5.

Link: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5210a9.htm

2nd request (Reviewer #1).

The authors have satisfactorily addressed all the reviewer's comments and no further revisions. The editor should correct the typographical error on the abstract -Line 10 because it looks like a word is missing. Otherwise, the manuscript should be accepted for publication in PlosOne.

Response to the 2nd request. We thank the reviewer for this remark. Indeed, “HBV infection” was missing from the text. We corrected this issue.

3rd request (Reviewer #2).

1. The introduction is too long. Lines 90-115, 116-127 may be shortened and portions used while discussing the results. For examples, lines 260 to 266 seems to be a repetition of part of 104-115.

2. I think a better title will be "exposure" not "infection" with HBV. anyone with anti-HBs has recovered so cannot be infected. (see also line 182; antigens were also tested for)

3. Line 250 HBV includes virus (saying HBV virus is therefore a repetition).

Response to the 3rd request. All these comments are extremely helpful. In the revised file, the reviewer and the editor will note that we: 1) shortened the introduction while also using some portions in the discussion; 2) revised the title and, when appropriated, substituted the word “infection” for exposure in the main text; and 3) deleted “virus” after HBV, hence avoiding repetition. All these changes are clearly marked using the “track changes” option and correspond to the sections of the text mentioned by the reviewer 2.

Finally, we followed the final instructions and removed our previous manuscript files and uploaded only this new Cover Letter. If you need any further information, please, do let us know. Once again, many thanks for your assistance.

Yours faithfully,

The authors

Attachment

Submitted filename: Rebbutal 4.docx

Decision Letter 2

Jason T Blackard

9 Nov 2022

Seroprevalence and factors associated with hepatitis B virus exposure in the incarcerated population from southern Brazil

PONE-D-22-06352R2

Dear Dr. Ferreto,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Jason T. Blackard, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

None

Reviewers' comments:

None

Acceptance letter

Jason T Blackard

14 Nov 2022

PONE-D-22-06352R2

Seroprevalence and factors associated with hepatitis B virus exposure in the incarcerated population from southern Brazil

Dear Dr. Defante Ferreto:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Jason T. Blackard

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Rebbutal 4.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Data cannot be shared publicly because of the National Health Council Resolution number 466 (http://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2012/Reso466.pdf), - items “II.25”, “III 1 q”, and “IV.3 e”. The resolution states that researchers could solely use and share the material and data obtained in the research exclusively according to the consent of the participants and/or partner institutions. At the time of data collection, participants were not asked to consent that their data could be shared. As such, any further use and/or sharing of data must be approved beforehand by contacting the Western Paraná State University Institutional Ethics Committee via e-mail (cep.prppg@unioeste.br) or telephone +(5545 3220-3056).


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES