Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 1;11:e73353. doi: 10.7554/eLife.73353

Table 3. Multilevel model evaluating effects of Group, Cue, and Trial on medium heat pain prior to reversal*.

Predictors Estimates Confidence intervals P-Value / probability of direction Bayesian estimates
LMER NLME§ BRMS LMER NLME§ BRMS LMER NLME§ BRMS % in ROPE Rhat ESS
All participants (n=40) (Intercept) 3.89 3.875 3.883 3.55–4.23 [3.53, 4.221] [ 3.598, 4.181] <0.001 0.000 100.00% 0 1 4860.246
Group 0.18 0.167 0.178 –0.16–0.51 [–0.183, 0.518] [–0.106, 0.480] 0.305 0.339 83.67% 45.258 1 5043.495
Cue 1.27 1.254 1.261 0.89–1.66 [0.857, 1.651] [ 0.939, 1.568] <0.001 0.000 100.00% 0 1 11882.091
Trial 0.11 0.107 0.11 0.02–0.21 [0.011, 0.202] [ 0.031, 0.190] 0.023 0.029 98.39% 88.483 1 13555.299
Group * Cue 0.44 0.425 0.442 0.06–0.83 [0.028, 0.823] [ 0.116, 0.758] 0.024 0.036 98.45% 8.892 1 12094.57
Group * Trial 0.14 0.133 0.135 0.04–0.23 [0.035, 0.231] [ 0.049, 0.213] 0.007 0.008 99.52% 75.492 1 13395.889
Cue * Trial 0.14 0.132 0.142 –0.01–0.30 [–0.032, 0.296] [ 0.005, 0.274] 0.071 0.114 95.07% 62.758 1 14333.687
(Group *Cue) *Trial 0.2 0.186 0.201 0.04–0.37 [0.016, 0.357] [ 0.060, 0.343] 0.016 0.033 98.70% 35.45 1 16585.744
Instructed Group (n=20) (Intercept) 4.07 4.034 4.076 3.63–4.51 [3.594, 4.475] [3.691, 4.455] <0.001 0 100.00% 0 1 4421.861
Cue 1.73 1.694 1.724 1.14–2.32 [1.088, 2.3] [1.204, 2.218] <0.001 0 100.00% 0 1 7914.074
Trial 0.26 0.252 0.26 0.08–0.44 [0.073, 0.43] [0.106, 0.422] 0.005 0.0063 99.28% 17.733 1 6993.832
Cue * Trial 0.35 0.294 0.361 0.04–0.66 [–0.031, 0.618] [0.088, 0.631] 0.027 0.0755 97.65% 13.558 1 7952.078
Uninstructed Group (n=20) (Intercept) 3.74 3.737 3.741 3.22–4.25 [3.215, 4.259] [ 3.261, 4.185] <0.001 0 100.00% 0 1.001 3062.443
Cue 0.89 0.885 0.874 0.40–1.38 [0.378, 1.392] [ 0.450, 1.262] <0.001 0.0008 99.88% 0.55 1.001 9645.377
Trial 0 –0.005 –0.005 –0.11–0.10 [–0.113, 0.103] [–0.095, 0.087] 0.928 0.9333 53.46% 99.433 1 8985.322
Cue * Trial –0.03 –0.035 –0.035 –0.20–0.14 [–0.211, 0.142] [–0.184, 0.112] 0.704 0.6975 65.33% 90.7 1 12054.973
*

This table presents results of a linear mixed model predicting subjective pain on medium heat trials as a function of Group (Instructed vs Uninstructed), Cue (Original High vs Original Low), and Trial prior to the first reversal, as well as post-hoc tests in each Group. See Table 1 for additional information about model specification and presentation.

Estimates based on Bayesian model linear mixed models using the ‘brms’ function (Bürkner, 2017) using the following code: brmPain~Group*Cue*Trial+(1+Cue*Trial|Subject,prior = set_prior("normal(0,2.5)", class="b"), save_all_pars = TRUE, silent = TRUE, refresh = 0, iter = 4000,, warmup = 1000). Posterior estimates and the Region of Partial Equivalence were obtained using the “describe_posterior” function from the package BayesTestR (Makowski et al., 2019a) and interpreted as in Makowski et al., 2019b. The Region of Partial Equivalence (ROPE) was defined as [–0.17, 0.17] across all participants, [–.172,.172] when restricted to the Instructed Group, and [–.168,.168] when restricted to the Uninstructed Group.

Estimates based on a linear mixed effects model implemented in the ‘lmer’ function of lme4 (Bates et al., 2015) using the following code: lmer(PainMedium~Group*Cue*Trial+(1+Cue*Trial||Subject)).

§

Estimates based on a linear mixed effects model implemented in the ‘lme’ function of nlme (Pinheiro et al., 2021) including autoregression using the following code: lme(Pain~Group *Cue*Trial, random = ~1 + Cue*Trial|Subject, correlation = corAR1, na.action=na.exclude).