Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Parasitology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Parasitology
. 2022 Jul-Sep;17(3):296–305. doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v17i3.10619

Detection of Blastocystis Subtypes in Children with Functional Abdominal Pain and Celiac Disease in Çorum, Turkey

Ayşe Semra Güreser 1,*, Atakan Comba 2, Djursun Karasartova 1, Nezahat Koşar 1, Adem Keskin 3, Christen Rune Stensvold 4, Ayşegül Taylan-Ozkan 1,5
PMCID: PMC9682370  PMID: 36466032

Abstract

Background:

Blastocystis has been associated with various symptoms of the gastrointestinal tract. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of Blastocystis in children with celiac disease (CeD) or functional abdominal pain (FAP) and to evaluate its subtypes (STs) with respect to demographic, socioeconomic and epidemiological factors.

Methods:

Overall, 161 fecal samples were collected from healthy children and patients with FAP or CeD in Hitit University Erol Olçok Research and Training Hospital, Corum, Turkey between 2016–2018. Samples were examined using both native-Lugol (NL) and trichrome-stained (TS) smears, and further analyses by PCR and Sanger sequencing were performed. A standard questionnaire was applied to obtain demographic, socioeconomic, epidemiological data.

Results:

Blastocystis was found in 10.6% of the total study population. Neither bacteria nor any other parasites were found, except for one Giardia (0.6%) in the CeD group. The presence/absence of the parasite was not found to be associated with demographic, socioeconomic and epidemiological factors. Blastocysis was detected in 11.5% (6/52) of the CeD, 7.7% (4/52) of the FAP, and 12.3% (7/57) of the healthy group. Diagnostic methods were similar in terms of Blastocystis detection (P= 0.671), and there was fair agreement between the NL, TS and PCR (Fleiss’ Kappa=0.847, P=0.001). ST2 (42.8%) and ST3 (35.7%) were the predominant STs followed by ST1 (21.4%).

Conclusion:

We observed no difference between study groups in terms of Blastocystis prevalence. ST1, ST2 and ST3 subtypes were detected. Blastocystis prevalence and STs were not related to any of the demographic, socioeconomic and epidemiological factors.

Keywords: Blastocystis, Celiac disease, Functional abdominal pain, Children, Gastroenterology

Introduction

Functional abdominal pain (FAP) is seen in a group of diseases that do not meet the diagnostic criteria for irritable bowel syndrome, functional dyspepsia, abdominal migraine, or organic abdominal pain. Intestinal permeability is increased in patients with FAP, and that past intestinal infections may give rise to symptoms of FAP (1). On the other hand, celiac disease (CeD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the small intestine triggered by the ingestion of gluten, which can cause significant morbidity (2).

Blastocystis is a parasite commonly found in the gastrointestinal tract of humans, and a wide variety of animals can be acquired via fecal-oral route through contaminated water and food or by exposure to animals (3). The prevalence of Blastocystis varies between 0.5% and 86.6% in children with respect to developmental level of the country and is associated with demographic, socioeconomic, and epidemiological factors (4, 5).

Although asymptomatic Blastocystis carriage is common, clinical trials and case reports have argued that Blastocystis can cause dermatological symptoms such as itching and rashes, as well as gastrointestinal complaints, such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, distention, bloating, nausea, constipation and anorexia in humans (3,6). These crucial characteristics warrant further investigation of the role of Blastocystis sub-types (STs) in patients with such symptoms. Especially considering that, prior studies have identified 22 STs of Blastocystis, which are morphologically indistinguishable from each other (7). Therefore, the STs may differ in terms of their clinical impact on the host (3, 6, 8).

We aimed to determine the prevalence of Blastocystis and molecular characterization of its subtypes in children with CeD or FAP and whether any particular STs can be linked these conditions. The secondary purpose of the study was to evaluate the presence of this parasite and its STs with respect to demographic, socioeconomic and epidemiological data.

Materials and Methods

Study outline and sample collection

The ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Clinical Research Ethics Board of Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Turkey (Approval Code/Date: E.Kurul-E-15-585/01.10.2015). Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of each individual participant included in the study.

A total of 161 children, consisted of 52 patients (23% male, 77% female) with CeD, 52 (54% male, 46% female) with FAP, and 57 healthy children (58% male, 42% female) living in Çorum, Turkey aged between 1 to 18 yr were included in the study between the 2016-Nov 2018.

Children with CeD and FAP were diagnosed based on the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) 2012 criteria, modified Marsh (Oberhuber) classification and Rome 4 diagnostic criteria (1,9).

A standard questionnaire was applied to each participant for the collection of demographic (age, gender), socioeconomic (parent’s education, economic income), and epidemiological (presence of domestic animals) data.

Microbiological examination

A total of 161 fresh fecal samples were collected (one sample from each participant) included in the study. Samples were examined macroscopically and microscopically using both native-Lugol (NL) and trichrome staining (TS) of direct smears (10, 11). Bacteriological cultures (Salmonella and Shigella) and viral antigen tests (adenovirus and rotavirus) were applied to watery stool samples. Parts of the freshly voided samples were stored at room temperature in polyvinyl alcohol for TS, and another aliquot was stored at −80 °C for molecular studies. All stool specimens were evaluated microscopically and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods.

DNA extraction and PCR analysis

For molecular analysis of Blastocystis, DNA extraction was performed on frozen samples using the GeneMATRIX Stool DNA Purification Kit (EURx, Gdansk, Poland) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Briefly, a total of 70 mg of fecal sample was used in each DNA extraction with a final elution volume of 100 μl. For detection of Blastocystis, small subunit rDNA (SSU-rDNA), and the primers BhRDr (5′-GAGCTTTTTAACTGCAACAACG-3′) and RD5 (5′-ATCTGGTTGATCCTGCCAGT-3′) were used in a touchdown PCR (12). Two microliters of DNA template were added to the standard PCR mixture yielding a total reaction volume of 25μl.

DNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

Sequences (approximately 600 bp) obtained by Sanger sequencing of the PCR products were analyzed using the Blastocystis STs (18S) and sequence typing database (MLST) (http://pubmlst.org/Blastocystis/) online software. Representative nucleotide sequences from this study were submitted to GenBank under the accession numbers MK416169–MK416182.

The evolutionary history of all raw nucleotide sequences and sequences of the various known Blastocystis subtypes were inferred by using the Neighbor-Joining method (13,14).

Statistical analysis

If one of the methods (NL, TS, or PCR) gave a positive result, the sample was scored as Blastocystis-positive.

Statistical analyses were performed where relevant using SPSS 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). All tests were two-sided, with a type I error (α) set at = 0.05. Associations between Blastocystis colonization and categorical parameters, including demographic, socioeconomic, epidemiological and clinical factors were evaluated using Pearson χ2 tests or Fisher’s exact tests. The Fleiss’ Kappa method was used for comparison of the three methods with regard to diagnostic performance (15). Probability (P) values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Prevalence of Blastocystis

By macroscopic examination, five (3.1%) stool samples were noted to have a watery appearance; whereas the remaining samples had normal consistency and color. No pathogenic bacteria were detected, and viral antigen tests were negative. Moreover, no pus, blood, or helminths were observed during macroscopic evaluation of the specimens.

Distribution of Blastocystis detection rates according to the diagnostic method is presented in Table 1. There was fair agreement between NL, TS microscopy and PCR results. Fleiss’ Kappa value was 0.847.This was confirmed by the P-value (P < 0.0001), indicating that our calculated Kappa was significantly different from zero.

Table 1:

Distribution of Blastocystis detection rates according to the diagnostic method

Diagnostic method Blastocystis-positive N (%) Blastocystis-negative N (%) P value
PCR 14 (8.7) 147 (91.3)
Native-Lugol Microscopy 12 (7.4) 149 (92.6) 0.671*
Trichrome-stained Microscopy 17 (10.6) 144 (89.4) 0.001**

* Pearson’s χ2

** Fleiss’ Kappa = 0.847

Demographic, socioeconomic, and epidemiological findings

A total of 161 children (median age, 8; inter-quartile range [IQR], 5–12) were enrolled in the study and 17 (10.6%) of these were Blastocystis-positive.

Distribution of Blastocystis prevalence according to gender and disease/control group is shown in Table 2.

Table 2:

Distribution of Blastocystis prevalence according to gender and disease/control group

Gender N (%) Blastocystis positive P value
CeD group
Male 12 (23.1) 3 / 12 0.127*
Female 40 (76.9) 3 / 40
FAP group
Male 28 (53.9) 3 / 28 0.615*
Female 24 (46.2) 1 / 24
Healthy group
Male 33 (57.9) 4 / 33 1.000*
Female 24 (42.1) 3 / 24
Overall
Male 73 (45.3) 10 / 73 0.238**
Female 88 (54.7) 7 / 88

* Fisher’s Exact Test,

** Pearson’s χ2

CeD: Celiac disease

FAP: Functional abdominal pain

Blastocystis prevalence in the 7–11 and 12–18 ages was 0.6% and 3.1% in the CeD group and 1.8% and 0.6% in FAP groups, respectively. In healthy group, prevalence was 1.2% in 0–11 ages and 1.8% in 12–18 ages. Blastocystis was more common in those aged 12–18 than in those aged 0–6, and overall Blastocystis prevalence was observed to increase by age: 1.9%, 3.1% and 5.6%, in the 0–6, 7–11 and 12–18 ages, respectively. However, there were no statistically significant differences between age groups in terms of Blastocystis detection rate. The overall median age was 12 yr for all positive cases, and median ages were similar in the CeD, FAP and healthy groups (12 yr, 9 yr, 10 yr, respectively). In the CeD group, Blastocystis was found most frequently detected in the 12–18 ages (9.6%), while no children with CeD or FAP in the 0–6 ages were positive for Blastocystis.

A minority of the parents (14.5%) were university graduates. Blastocystis detected in 9.3% of the children whose fathers had graduate lower than university and in 10.6% of those whose mothers had graduate lower than university. There were no significant relationships between Blastocystis positivity and parental education level.

Most of the parents (67.3% in the CeD group, 71.2% in the FAP group, 57.9% in the healthy group) had low socioeconomic status (monthly income ≤400 $). Blastocystis prevalence in children who had low socioeconomic status was 2.5% in CeD and FAP groups, 3.2% in healthy group. While the prevalence of Blastocystis was 1.2% in the CeD and healthy groups in children with middle-high socioeconomic status, it was not detected in the FAP group. Although Blastocystis frequency was highest among children with low socioeconomic status, the distribution of the parasite was not significantly associated with demographic or socioeconomic factors.

Distribution of Blastocystis prevalence according to the domestic animal owners shown in Table 3.There was no significant relationship between Blastocystis and domestic animal ownership.

Table 3:

Distribution of Blastocystis prevalence according to the domestic animal owners

Variable N (%) Blastocystis positive P value*
CeD group
Yes 8 (15.4) 1 / 8 1.000
No 44 (84.6) 5 / 44
FAP group
Yes 7 (13.5) 1 / 7 0.450
No 45 (86.5) 3 / 45
Healthy group
Yes 8 (14) 2 / 8 0.252
No 49 (86) 5 / 49
Overall
Yes 23 (14.3) 4 / 23 0.270
No 138 (85.7) 13 / 138

*Fisher’s Exact Test

CeD: Celiac disease

FAP: Functional abdominal pain

The most majority of the children were using bottled water (57.1%) for drinking. While Blastocystis was not detected in CeD and healthy groups in those who use tap water for drinking, the prevalence of Blastocystis was 0.6% in FAP group. In those who use bottled water for drinking, Blastocystis prevalence was 3.7%, 1.9% and 4.3% in CeD, FAP and healty groups respectively. Blastocystis was remarkably more common in those who used bottled water for drinking in the CeD and healthy groups (P=0.001).

Blastocystis subtype (ST) distribution and association with disease

Blastocystis was detected in 11.5% (6/52), 7.7% (4/52) and 12.3% (7/57) of the individuals in the CeD, FAP and healthy groups, respectively, as determined by trichrome. Blastocystis detection rate by PCR presented in Table 4. Except one case of (1.92%) G. intestinalis infection in the CeD group, no other viral, bacterial and parasitic agents were found in any of the patients. Statistically significant differences were not found between the CeD, FAP and healthy groups in terms of Blastocystis frequency.

Table 4:

Distribution of Blastocystis subtypes found positive by PCR according to the disease

Variable Blastocystis positive by PCR # Subtypes (STs)a

ST1
N (%)
ST2
N (%)
ST3
N (%)
CeD Group 5 (35.7) 4 (28.6) 1 (7.1)
FAP Group 4 (28.6) 1 (7.1) 1 (7.1) 2 (14.3)
Healthy group 5 (35.7) 2 (14.3) 1 (7.1) 2 (14.3)
Total 14 (100) 3 (21.4) 6 (42.8) 5 (35.7)

a Only 14 PCR positive samples included in the analysis

CeD: Celiac disease

FAP: Functional abdominal pain

To determine Blastocystis STs, PCR products of 14 PCR-positive stool samples were sequenced bidirectionaly. There was no significant difference between the CeD and FAP groups in terms of Blastocystis ST frequency (Table 4). In addition, there was no relationship between Blastocystis ST frequencies and age (Table 5).

Table 5:

Distribution of Blastocystis subtypes found positive by PCR according to the age

Age(yr) Blastocystis positive N (%) Subtypes (STs)a
ST1
N (%)
ST2
N (%)
ST3
N (%)
0–6 1 (7.1) 1 (7.1)
7–11 5 (35.7) 2 (14.3) 2 (14.3) 1 (7.1)
12–18 8 (57.1) 1 (7.1) 4 (28.6) 3 (21.4)
Total 14 (100) 3 (21.4) 6 (42.8) 5 (35.7)

a Only 14 PCR positive samples included in the analysis

Phylogenetic analysis

The evolutionary history of Blastocystis was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method (Fig. 1). The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 0.29238781 is shown. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths directly representing the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree.

Fig. 1:

Fig. 1:

Evolutionary relationships of taxa of Blastocystis among children with FAP and CeD in Çorum, Turkey

Discussion

CeD is an autoimmune disease and the role of impaired intestinal epithelial permeability in the formation of CeD is well known. Colon microbiota plays a role in the regulation of the intestinal mucosa barrier and epithelial permeability (15).

Although there are several studies investigating the relationship between microbiota/probiotics and CeD in recent years, the relationship between Blastocystis, and CeD has not been investigated before (1617). Our study is the first to determine the frequency of Blastocysis in pediatric CeD and FAP patients in the literature. Blastocystis was less frequent in FAP patients and most frequent in healthy children, while there was no statistically difference between patients with CeD (11.5%) or FAP (7.7%) and healthy children (12.3%) in terms of Blastocystis detection frequency (P = 0.7103). Blastocystis was more prevalent in healthy controls and in patients with inactive ulcerative colitis compared to those with active disease (18). Similarly, Rossen et al found it to be significantly less common in patients with ulcerative colitis than in healthy controls (19). Interestingly, several other recent studies have reported that Blastocystis is found more frequently in healthy individuals than patients with gastrointestinal disease (20).

Children are thought to be more susceptible to intestinal infections, especially because of poor hygiene practices, frequent contact with soil, and the immaturity of their immune system (21). Blastocystis prevalence demonstrates considerable variation with respect to the developmental level of the country and the urban/rural nature of the research population. Sagnuankiat et al detected Blastocystis in 0.5% of the children in Thailand (4), while Rebolla et al found in 86.63% of Brazilian school’s children (5). There are only a few reports of Blastocystis prevalence in children in our country, which have reported significant variations in prevalence, from 1.1% to 37.9% (22,23). In the current study, positivity was detected in 10.6% of the children.

We found that Blastocystis positivity was not related to the sex of the children. The distribution of Blastocystis did not vary according to sex (10) however, in contrast, the prevalence of Blastocystis infection was higher in males compared to females (24).In our study, Blastocystis was most frequent in the 12–18 ages and it appeared that prevalence was increasing by age, albeit statistical significance was not observed. Forsell et al and Beyhan et al reported similar results, with their data indicating highest prevalence in those aged 7–13 yr in addition to increased frequency with age (25,26). This may mean that colonization is relatively rare among infants and toddlers, while older children are more commonly colonized.

Blastocystis positivity was not significantly related to socioeconomic status and education level of the parents in our study. Blastocystosis is more common in children whose parents had a basic level of education (27). On the other hand, the frequency of Blastocystis was not associated with socioeconomic status (28), similar to our findings.

Blastocystis transmission occurs through the fecal-oral route among humans. There may also be zoonotic transmission from animals such as, chickens, pigs and horses (29,30). In addition, increased risk for Blastocystis presence among individuals who have close contact with animals, including zookeepers and abattoir workers was reported (31,32). Our findings did not demonstrate any relationship between Blastocystis prevalence and domestic animal ownership.

Source of the drinking water is the most important risk factor for protozoon infections (33) Seyer et al did not find a link between Blastocystis carriage and source of drinking water (10). In our study, there was no family using water collected from the wells and Blastocystis was remarkably more common in bottled water users in CeD and healthy groups than the tap water users. It is controversial, since it is expected that bottled water is safer. Further study is needed on this subject because of the low positive cases in our study.

Today, based on small subunit rRNA gene analysis (SSU rDNA), more than 22 STs of Blastocystis have been identified (34).

In this study, ST2 (42.8%) and ST3 (35.7%) were the predominant STs, followed by ST1 (21.4%) in the study group. Although ST3 has been reported as the most common ST in our country, ST1 and ST2 have also been reported in some studies as the most common STs depending on the region of the study population and the symptomatic or asymptomatic states of the individuals analyzed (23,3537). In our study, ST2 was the most common ST in the CeD group (28.6%). In addition, we detected predominantly ST1 (14.3%) and ST3 (14.3%) in the healthy children. We found the expected STs which were previously found in Turkey (3537) and none of the STs were more predominant than others were overall. It seems that children were not affiliated with a particular STs detected. ST1, ST2 and ST3 were the most common STs in humans across the globe, but we could not identify any patients with ST4, which is frequently observed in studies outside Europe (10).

In our study to determine Blastocystis STs we used limited number of PCR products of PCR-positive stool samples, which may be a limitation of our study.

Conclusion

In the study where Blastocystis frequencies were assessed in children with CeD, FAP and healthy controls, we observed no statistically difference between study groups in terms of Blastocystis prevalence. ST1, ST2 and ST3 were the most common STs and presence of the parasite and its STs were not significantly related to any of the demographic, socioeconomic and epidemiological factors. To determine the association of STs with CeD or FAP, further studies which include a greater number of subjects are required.

Acknowledgements

Funded by Hitit University Scientific Research Projects Unit, Grant/Award Number: TIP19002.15.007

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Rasquin A, Di Lorenzo C, Forbes D, et al. Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders: child/adolescent. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(5):1527–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rosinach M, Esteve M, Gonzalez C, et al. Lymphocytic duodenosis: aetiology and long-term response to specific treatment. Dig Liver Dis. 2012;44(8):643–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tan KS. New insights on classification, identification, and clinical relevance of Blastocystis spp. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21(4):639–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sagnuankiat S, Wanichsuwan M, Bhunnachet E, et al. Health status of immigrant children and environmental survey of child daycare centers in Samut Sakhon Province, Thailand. J Immigr Minor Health. 2016;18(1):21–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rebolla MF, Silva EM, Gomes JF, et al. High prevalence of Blastocystis spp. infection in children and staff members attending public urban schools in Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2016;58:31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ozcakir O, Gureser S, Erguven S, et al. Characteristics of Blastocystis hominis infection in a Turkish university hospital. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2007;31(4):277–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Scanlan PD. Blastocystis: past pitfalls and future perspectives. Trends Parasitol. 2012;28(8):327–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dogruman-Al F, Yoshikawa H, Kustimur S, et al. PCR-based subtyping of Blastocystis isolates from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in a major hospital in Ankara, Turkey. Parasitol Res. 2009;106(1):263–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Comba A, Güreser AS, Karasartova D, et al. Thiol-disulfide homeostasis in children with celiac disease. Pediatr Int. 2020. Aug;62(8):950–956. doi: 10.1111/ped.14243. PMID: . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Seyer A, Karasartova D, Ruh E, et al. Epidemiology and prevalence of Blastocystis spp. in North Cyprus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;96(5):1164–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Seyer A, Karasartova D, Ruh E, et al. Is “dried stool spots on filter paper method (DSSFP)” more sensitive and effective for detecting Blastocystis spp. and their subtypes by PCR and sequencing? Parasitol Res. 2016;115(12):4449–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Scicluna SM, Tawari B, Clark CG. DNA barcoding of blastocystis. Protist. 2006;157(1):77–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4(4):406–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Anonymus . Avaialble from: http://entamoeba.lshtm.ac.uk/ref.blasto.txt
  • 15.Guandalini S, Setty M. Celiac Disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2008;24(6):707–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pecora F, Persico F, Gismondi P, et al. Gut Microbiota in Celiac Disease: Is There Any Role for Probiotics?. Front Immunol. 2020;11:957. Published 2020 May 15. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chibbar R, Dieleman LA. The Gut Microbiota in Celiac Disease and probiotics. Nutrients. 2019;11(10):2375. Published 2019 Oct 5. doi: 10.3390/nu11102375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Petersen AM, Stensvold CR, Mirsepasi H, et al. Active ulcerative colitis associated with low prevalence of Blastocystis and Dientamoeba fragilis infection. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48(5):638–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rossen NG, Bart A, Verhaar N, et al. Low prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in active ulcerative colitis patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34(5):1039–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Beghini F, Pasolli E, Truong TD, et al. Large-scale comparative metagenomics of Blastocystis, a common member of the human gut microbiome. ISME J. 2017;11(12):2848–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.LaBeaud AD, Nayakwadi Singer M, McKibben M, et al. Parasitism in children aged three years and under: Relationship between infection and growth in rural coastal Kenya. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(5):e0003721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Degerli S, Celiksoz A, Aslan A, et al. Comparison of the results of examination of fecal samples from students at six months intervals in the Alahaci village primary school in Sivas. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2006;30(4):305–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dogan N, Aydin M, Tuzemen NU, et al. Subtype distribution of Blastocystis spp. isolated from children in Eskisehir, Turkey. Parasitol Int. 2017;66(1):948–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cabrine-Santos M, Cintra Edo N, do Carmo RA, et al.Occurrence of Blastocystis spp. in uberaba, minas gerais, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2015;57(3):211–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Forsell J, Granlund M, Samuelsson L, et al. High occurrence of Blastocystis sp. subtypes 1–3 and Giardia intestinalis assemblage B among patients in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Beyhan YE, Yilmaz H, Cengiz ZT, et al. Clinical significance and prevalence of Blastocystis hominis in Van, Turkey. Saudi Med J. 2015;36(9):1118–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cociancic P, Torrusio SE, Zonta ML, et al. Risk factors for intestinal parasitoses among children and youth of Buenos Aires, Argentina. One Health. 2019;9:100116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Oliveira-Arbex AP, David EB, Guimaraes S. Blastocystis genetic diversity among children of low-income daycare center in Southeastern Brazil. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;57:59–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yoshikawa H, Tokoro M, Nagamoto T, et al. Molecular survey of Blastocystis sp. from humans and associated animals in an Indonesian community with poor hygiene. Parasitol Int. 2016;65(6 Pt B):780–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Basak S, Rajurkar MN, Mallick SK. Detection of Blastocystis hominis: a controversial human pathogen. Parasitol Res. 2014;113(1):261–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Parkar U, Traub RJ, Vitali S, et al. Molecular characterization of Blastocystis isolates from zoo animals and their animal-keepers. Vet Parasitol. 2010;169(1–2):8–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rajah Salim H, Suresh Kumar G, Vellayan S, et al. Blastocystis in animal handlers. Parasitol Res. 1999;85(12):1032–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Assavapongpaiboon B, Bunkasem U, Sanprasert V, et al. A Cross-Sectional Study on Intestinal Parasitic Infections in Children in Suburban Public Primary Schools, Saraburi, the Central Region of Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98(3):763–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Stensvold CR, Clark CG. Molecular identification and subtype analysis of Blastocystis. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2016;43:20A. 2. 1–20A. 2 .10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dogruman-Al F, Dagci H, Yoshikawa H, et al. A possible link between subtype 2 and asymptomatic infections of Blastocystis hominis. Parasitol Res. 2008;103(3):685–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ertug S, Malatyali E, Ertabaklar H, et al. Subtype distribution of Blastocystis isolates and evaluation of clinical symptoms detected in Aydin province, Turkey. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2015;49(1):98–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yersal O, Malatyali E, Ertabaklar H, et al. Blastocystis subtypes in cancer patients: Analysis of possible risk factors and clinical characteristics. Parasitol Int. 2016;65(6 Pt B):792–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES