Abstract
Objective:
Fever continues to be the most frequent cause of care in the pediatric population. The uses of invasive and unnecessary tests result in discomfort to the patients. Local epidemiological data could help to refine screening strategies, especially in low resources settings. The present study aims to describe the prevalence of serious bacterial infections in infants with fever without source and to evaluate the usefulness of clinical and laboratory parameters in the identification of serious bacterial infections.
Materials and Methods:
We included all children aged 0-36 months presenting with fever without source between January 2015 and December 2017. Demographic and clinical characteristics, investigations, and management procedures were recorded at the time of inclusion. Potential predictors of serious bacterial infections were compared between patients with and without serious bacterial infections.
Results:
In total, 137 patients were included. Serious bacterial infections were diagnosed in 41 patients (29.9%; 95% CI, 22%-38%). The most frequent diagnosis in serious bacterial infection patients was urinary tract infection (78%). Serum C-reactive protein levels greater than 80 mg/L (odds ratio, 2.79 [1.14,6.86]) and total days with fever (odds ratio, 2.56 [1.81,3.62]) showed a significant association to predict serious bacterial infections.
Conclusion:
Most infants with fever without source presented self-limited febrile syndromes without evidence of severe bacterial infection. C-reactive protein levels greater than 80 mg/L and the number of previous days with fever were variables associated with the presence of serious bacterial infections. Our results need to be validated in other tropical countries.
Keywords: Fever, children, serum C-reactive protein (CRP)
What is already known on this topic?
There is disagreement in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with fever without source. It frequently uses invasive tests which lead to discomfort to the patients and higher costs to the health system.
What this study adds on this topic?
Among all the clinical and biochemical variables assessed, serum C-reactive protein greater than 80 mg/L and the number of previous days with fever were variables associated with the presence of serious bacterial infections.
Introduction
Fever without source (FWS) is the one of most common diagnoses in pediatric patients less than 2 years.1 In 30% of infants, this diagnosis could be the principal manifestation of potentially serious infections.2-4 After introducing, at the beginning of this century, specific vaccination against Haemophilus influenzae type b and Streptococcus pneumoniae, the rates of serious bacterial infection (SBI) decreased significantly worldwide.4-9 However, this syndrome continues to generate concerns, especially among parents and doctors. There is no consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with FWS. It is usually the use of invasive and (cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] or Blood culture, etc) which fallouts in discomfort to the patients.10,11 Additionally, in tropical countries, where diseases such as malaria or dengue fever or parasitic diseases are still prevalent, even the epidemiological characterization of fever in children is incomplete.12 Local epidemiological data could help to refine screening strategies, especially in low-resource settings where the lack of information does not allow the design of health policies. The present study aims to describe the prevalence of SBI in infants with FWS and to evaluate the usefulness of clinical and laboratory parameters in the identification of SBI.
Materials and Methods
Study Design
This single-center retrospective study was carried out in the pediatric emergency department (ED) of a tertiary hospital that has nearly 190 000 visits per year. Due to the retrospective nature of our study, informed consent was not obtained, according to local regulations. All research was performed following relevant guidelines/regulations approved by the Institutional Review Board of Uniremington University (Acta No 4 de 2014).
Study Population
All patients aged 0-36 months with FWS in emergency room between January 2015 to December 2017 in a tertiary care hospital in Rionegro, Colombia, were eligible for inclusion in the study. We define FWS as a patient with a temperature of ≥38.0°C (less than 10 days of duration) with no other infectious source such as respiratory symptoms, diarrhea, acute otitis media, etc. Patients with major chronic condition, ongoing antibiotic treatment, or difficulty in communicating were excluded. Serious bacterial infection was defined as “patients diagnosed with bacteremia or urinary tract infection (UTI) or bacterial meningitis, or pneumonia.” Our hospital adapts the clinical guideline of manage feverish illness in children aged under 5 years from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence to define diagnosis and treatment of all patients with FWS.13 The decision for inpatient versus outpatient management and antibiotic treatment was at the discretion of the treating physician on a patient-by-patient basis.
The following variables were recollected: age, sex, comorbidities, previous vaccination for Haemophilus influenzae type b (3 doses at 2, 4, and 6 months of age) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (2 doses at 4 and 12 months of age of PCV13), symptoms and signs in emergency room. White blood cell counts, absolute neutrophil count, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), and urine dipstick were obtained in all patients. Tests such as blood culture, chest radiograph, and cerebrospinal fluid examination were taken at the discretion of the physician.
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables were described using mean with standard deviation and medians are reported with interquartile ranges (IQRs); while for categorical variables, relative frequencies with their 95% CI were used. According to its parametric or non-parametric distribution, Student’s t-tests or Kruskal–Wallis tests for continuous variables and chi-square test or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables were used to compare clinical and sociodemographic variables between patients with and without SBI. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for each of the possible predictor variables of SBI using logistic regression models, adjusting for potential confounders. All tests were 2-tailed, and a value of P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were made using STATA 17.0.
Results
Characteristics of the Study Population
Totally 137 patients were included and 57% were females. The median age was 14 months with an IQR between 8 and 24 months. Ninety-nine percent of the study population had complete vaccination. Most of the infants were qualified as “good general appearance” at admission (n = 102, 74.5%), had pink skin coloration (n = 127, 92.7%), and were hydrated (n = 123, 89.8%). Two-thirds of the children had a CRP value greater than 20 mg/L (n = 87, 63.5%). Sixty-nine infants (50.4%) had a white blood cell count ≥ 15 000 103/μL and 39% had neutrophils ≥ 10 000 103/μL . No patients died, and 6 children (4.4%) required an intensive care unit.
Frequency of Serious Bacterial Infections
Serious bacterial infection was diagnosed in 41 children (29.9%; 95% C,I 22%-38%). The most frequent cause of SBI was UTI (n = 32, 78%) followed by pneumonia (n = 3, 7%), bacteremia (n = 4, 9%) and meningitis (n = 2, 4%). Among the non-SBI patients, their final diagnosis was upper respiratory infection (n = 16), gastroenteritis (n = 11), viral rashes (n = 6), and 63 have FWS without a recognized etiology. Except for age and adequate hydration status, there were no differences in the baseline characteristics of patients with and without SBI (Table 1). The pathogens isolated in urine cultures were Escherichia coli (n = 22), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 2), Proteus mirabilis (n=3), while in the blood culture were Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 2,) Pseudomonas aureginosa (n = 1), Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 1). Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from the blood culture of the infant diagnosed with meningitis.
Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics and Clinical Evolution of SBI and Non-SBI Patients
| Variable | Non-SBI (n = 97) | SBI (n = 40) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, (%) | <3 months | 2 (2) | 7 (17) | .002 |
| 3-6 months | 13 (13) | 8 (20) | ||
| >6 months | 82 (85) | 25 (63) | ||
| Age , months , median (IQR), (%) | 16.0 (9.0, 24.0) | 10.0 (3.5, 23.5) | .005 | |
| Sex, (%) | Male | 40 (41) | 18 (45%) | .69 |
| Female | 57 (59) | 22 (55) | ||
| Weight (kg) | 10.0 (7.9, 12.0) | 9.0 (6.0, 11.5) | .046 | |
| Complete vaccination for Haemophilus influenzae type b and Streptococcus pneumoniae,(%) | Yes | 97 (100) | 39 (97) | .12 |
| No | 0 (0) | 1 (3) | ||
| Underlying pathology, (%) | No | 57 (59) | 25 (63) | .68 |
| Yes | 40 (41) | 15 (37) | ||
| Recurrent urinary tract infections, (%) | No | 86 (89) | 33 (83) | .33 |
| Yes | 11 (11) | 7 (17) | ||
| Recurrent wheezing, (%) | No | 95 (98) | 37 (93) | .12 |
| Yes | 2 (2) | 3 (7) | ||
| Good general appearance at admission, (%) | Yes | 76 (78) | 26 (65) | .10 |
| No | 21 (22) | 14 (35) | ||
| Adequate hydration status, (%) | Yes | 83 (86) | 40 (100) | .01 |
| No | 14 (14) | 0 (0) | ||
| Color, (%) | Normal color | 89 (92) | 38 (95) | .51 |
| Pale/mottled/blue | 8 (8) | 2 (5) | ||
| Temperature, median (IQR) | 38.0 (37.7, 38.7) | 38.5 (37.8, 39.0) | .12 | |
| Temperature, °C, (%) | <39 | 48 (49) | 13 (33) | .06 |
| ≥39 | 49 (51) | 27 (67) | ||
| Clinical evolution | ||||
| Hospitalization days, median (IQR) | 4.0 (3.0, 5.0) | 7.0 (5.0, 7.0) | <.001 | |
| Antimicrobials, n (%) | 77 (79) | 40 (100) | .002 | |
| Antimicrobials days, median (IQR) | 3.0 (3.0, 5.0) | 7.0 (5.5, 7.0) | <.001 | |
| Admission to ICU, n (%) | 1 (1) | 5 (13) | .008 | |
P-values correspond to Mann–Whitney test or Fisher exact test or chi-square test.
IQR, interquartile range; ICU, intensive care unit; SBI, serious bacterial infection.
Risk Factors Associated with Serious Bacterial Infection
A higher proportion of infants with CRP levels greater than 80 mg/L (cut-off point used) was present in the SBI group compared to the non-SBI group (33% vs. 15%, P = .02). There were no significant differences at admission regarding abnormal leukocyte levels and toxic aspects, when comparing the groups with and without SBI (P > .05) except in weight (P = .046), Table 2.
Table 2.
Clinical and Laboratory Parameters
| Variable | Non-SBI (n = 97) | SBI (n = 40) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRP (mg/L) | <80 | 82 (85%) | 27 (68%) | .02 |
| >80 | 15 (15%) | 13 (33%) | ||
| White blood cell count (15 × 103/µL) | <15 000 | 49 (51%) | 19 (48%) | .75 |
| >15 000 | 48 (49%) | 21 (53%) | ||
| Total days with fever, median (IQR) | 3.0 (2.5, 5.0) | 7.0 (5.0, 7.0) | .00 | |
| Traffic light system for identifying risk of serious illness (NICE) | Low risk | 51 (53%) | 19 (48%) | .61 |
| Intermediate risk | 37 (38%) | 15 (38%) | ||
| High risk | 9 (9%) | 6 (15%) |
P-values correspond to Mann–Whitney test or Fisher exact test or chi-square test.
SBI, serious bacterial infection; IQR, interquartile range; CRP, C-reactive protein; WBC, white blood cells.
To evaluate the predictive value of the laboratory and clinical parameters under study, we created logistic regression models with raw data (using only one of the predictor variables of interest) and models adjusted by sex, age, and weight. Also, we created a model that included all the variables of interest jointly and assessed the predictive value of these variables in a raw and adjusted form. In this analysis, the total number of days with fever and CRP levels greater than 80 mg/L showed a significant OR to predict the SBI (Table 3). The combination of clinical and laboratory parameters for the diagnosis of SBI showed an area under ROC curve of 0.913.
Table 3.
SBI Predictive Value of Clinical and Laboratory Parameters
| Model | Crude OR | Adjusted OR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total days with fever | 2.45 [1.78,3.37] | 2.56 [1.81,3.62] | |
| Traffic light system for identifying the risk of serious illness (NICE) | Low risk | 1 | 1 |
| Intermediate risk | 1.08 [0.48,2.41] | 1.01 [0.43,2.36] | |
| High risk | 1.78 [0.56,5.70] | 1.03 [0.28,3.76] | |
| CRP (mg/L) | >80 | 2.63 [1.11,6.22] | 2.79 [1.14,6.86] |
| White blood cell count (15 × 103/µL) | >15 000 | 1.12 [0.53,2.35] | 1.18 [0.55,2.53] |
| Combined | |||
| Total days with fever | 2.52 [1.81,3.51] | 2.67 [1.85,3.86] | |
| Traffic light system for identifying risk of serious illness (NICE) | Low risk | 1 | 1 |
| Intermediate risk | 1.01 [0.35,2.88] | 0.89 [0.30,2.64] | |
| High risk | 0.98 [0.16,5.75] | 0.61 [0.07,4.88] | |
| CRP (mg/L) | >80 | 3.20 [0.95,10] | 3.89 [1.10,14.33] |
| White blood cell count (103/mL) | >15000 | 0.63 [0.22,1.80] | 0.67 [0.22,2.01] |
Odds ratio is obtained by logistic regression models considering only the indicated variable (crude model) or adjusted variable (by sex, age, and weight). The model considers all the above variables in a single model (hours of fever,toxic aspect, alteration of CRP, and leukocytes).
CRP, C-reactive protein; WBC, white blood cells; OR, odds ratio.
Discussion
We illustrate the prevalence of SBI in a population of highly vaccinated infants with FWS. In our study, 41 of 137 infants (29%) had SBI. This prevalence was similar to previous studies in Latin America and slightly higher than that reported in developed countries.5,14-16 As has been published in other studies, most of the infants with FWS were children with a good general appearance and good general condition. Moreover, 45% of the infants had no clear etiology of fever during hospitalization and 25% had non-severe infections. This is consistent with what is already known about the etiology and prognosis of FWS; most of the cases are febrile illnesses with possible viral etiology, self-limited, and without complications, even in tropical countries such as ours.17 The most frequent cause of SBI, and also in agreement with previous studies, was UTI; E. coli was the most frequent etiologic agent in 68% of the cases.18,19 This finding highlights the necessity to screen all patients with FWS for the presence or absence of UTI regardless of their clinical status or medical history.
Among the biochemical and clinical markers studied, the presence of CRP levels greater than 80 mg/L and the number of days with fevers were the best predictors of the presence of SBI in our population. While 33% of patients with SBI had CRP levels greater than 80 mg/L, only 15% of non-SBI patients had such levels. In the adjusted logistic model, patients with CRP levels greater than 80 mg/L were twice as likely to have SBI. This finding correlates with previous studies that have shown that in infants with FWS, CRP levels are one of the independent markers most frequently associated with SBI.20-24 Likewise, on each day of fever before admission to the emergency department, the risk of SBI increased twice. Patients with SBI were admitted with a median number of days with a fever of 7 days, while in non-SBI patients, it was 3 days. Previous studies have found that the AUC in the prediction models was greater in patients who presented with fever >12 hours than those with fever <12 hours.20,25
As has been previously documented and occurred in our study, no single symptom, sign, or biomarker has a high capacity to discriminate against infants with or without SBI.16,17,26 It is the combination of clinical and laboratory findings (as in our case, days of fever, CRP levels, age, urinalysis) that can guide the physician regarding the presence or absence of SBI and the need for invasive studies or antibiotic treatment. This information is very important in developing countries where a thorough clinical history, CRP levels, and urinalysis can be used to make better decisions. In our study, the prevalence of meningitis was low but slightly higher than that reported by recent clinical practice guidelines. However, in patients with good clinical appearance do not support routinely obtaining cerebrospinal fluid in all patients, among other reasons due to the high frequency of UTI over meningitis in this population, as was also the case in our study.27 Our study has certain limitations. Although this is a study carried out in a single tertiary center, which may limit its external validity, it includes most of the consultations in the region, which has an epidemiological profile not very different from that of the population of the country.25,26 Additionally, we cannot exclude information biases due to retrospective nature of the secondary source information; however, all the information from the patients was available at least to guarantee the completeness of the information presented here.
In conclusion, most infants with FWS presented self-limited febrile syndromes without evidence of SBI. C-reactive protein levels greater than 80 mg/L and the number of previous days with fever were variables associated with the presence of SBI. Our results need to be validated in other tropical countries.
Footnotes
Ethics Committee Approval: This study was approved by Ethics committee of University Uniremington, (Approval No: 26).
Informed Consent: Informed consent was not obtained, according to local regulations.
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Author Contributions: Concept – J.A.B., M.B., D.B.; Design – J.A.B., M.B., D.B.; Supervision – J.A.B., M.B., D.B.; Funding – J.A.B., M.B., D.B.; Materials – J.A.B., M.B., D.B.; Data Collection and/or Processing – J.A.B., M.B., D.B.; Analysis and/or Interpretation – J.A.B., M.B., D.B.; Literature Review – J.A.B., M.B., D.B.; Writing – J.A.B., M.B., D.B.; Critical Review – J.A.B., M.B., D.B.
Declaration of Interests: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Funding: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.
References
- 1. Straface R. El niño febril de 1 a 24 meses de edad. Arch argent pediatr. 2001;99(6):18. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Baraff LJ. Management of fever without source in infants and children. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;36(6):602 614. 10.1067/mem.2000.110820) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Trainor JL, Stamos JK. Fever without a localizing source. Pediatr Ann. 2011;40(1):21 25. 10.3928/00904481-20101214-06) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Baraff LJ. Management of infants and young children with fever without source. Pediatr Ann. 2008;37(10):673 679. 10.3928/00904481-20081001-01) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Torregrosa C, García C, Sciarotta J, Vay C, Caíno S, Ellis A. Associated risk factors for serious bacterial illness in children less than 24 months, admitted with fever without source. Rev Chilena Infectol. 2010;27(4):308 314. 10.4067/s0716-10182010000500003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Galetto-Lacour A, Gervaix A. Identifying severe bacterial infection in children with fever without source. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010;8(11):1231 1237. 10.1586/eri.10.118) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Rudinsky SL, Carstairs KL, Reardon JM, Simon LV, Riffenburgh RH, Tanen DA. Serious bacterial infections in febrile infants in the post-pneumococcal conjugate vaccine era. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(7):585 590. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00444.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Carstairs KL, Tanen DA, Johnson AS, Kailes SB, Riffenburgh RH. Pneumococcal bacteremia in febrile infants presenting to the emergency department before and after the introduction of the heptavalent pneumococcal vaccine. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(6):772 777. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.10.026) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Herz AM, Greenhow TL, Alcantara J.et al. Changing epidemiology of outpatient bacteremia in 3- to 36-month-old children after the introduction of the heptavalent-conjugated pneumococcal vaccine. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25(4):293 300. 10.1097/01.inf.0000207485.39112.bf) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Van den Bruel A, Thompson MJ, Haj-Hassan T.et al. Diagnostic value of laboratory tests in identifying serious infections in febrile children: systematic review. BMJ. 2011;342(8):d3082. 10.1136/bmj.d3082) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Van den Bruel A, Thompson M, Buntinx F, Mant D. Clinicians’ gut feeling about serious infections in children: observational study. BMJ. 2012;345(25):e6144. 10.1136/bmj.e6144) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Torres-Fernandez D, Prieto Tato LM, Perez-Ayala A, Moraleda C, Fernandez Cooke E, Blazquez-Gamero D, Rojo P, Perez Rivilla A, Epalza C. Etiology and outcome of febrile children coming from the tropics. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2020 Sep 29: S0213-005X(20)30269-X English, Spanish. 10.1016/j.eimc.2020.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Davis T. NICE guideline: feverish illness in children--assessment and initial management in children younger than 5 years. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2020;98(6):232 235. 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304792) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Gutiérrez IF, Ospina J, Rodríguez T, Zamora F. Fiebre sin foco aparente en menores de 36 meses en un servicio de urgencias de un hospital de tercer nivel de Bogotá, Colombia. Pediatria. 2012;45(4):226 234. 10.1016/S0120-4912(15)30020-3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Moya M, Couble P B, Piñera M C.et al. Utility of basic clinical and laboratory parameters to predict Serious Bacterial Infection in children younger than 3 months old hospitalized for Febrile Syndrome without Source. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2020;91(2):199 208. 10.32641/rchped.v91i2.1261) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Thompson M, Van den Bruel A, Verbakel J.et al. Systematic review and validation of prediction rules for identifying children with serious infections in emergency departments and urgent-access primary care. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(15):1 100. 10.3310/hta16150) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Van den Bruel A, Haj-Hassan T, Thompson M, Buntinx F, Mant D. European Research Network on Recognising Serious Infection investigators. Diagnostic value of clinical features at presentation to identify serious infection in children in developed countries: a systematic review. Lancet. 2010;375(9717):834 845. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62000-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Phasuk N, Nurak A. Etiology, treatment, and outcome of children aged 3 to 36 months with fever without a source at a community hospital in Southern Thailand. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020;11:2150132720915404. 10.1177/2150132720915404) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Lacour AG, Zamora SA, Gervaix A. A score identifying serious bacterial infections in children with fever without source. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27(7):654 656. 10.1097/INF.0b013e318168d2b4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Pratt A, Attia MW. Duration of fever and markers of serious bacterial infection in young febrile children. Pediatr Int. 2007;49(1):31 35. 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2007.02316.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Pulliam PN, Attia MW, Cronan KM. C-reactive protein in febrile children 1 to 36 months of age with clinically undetectable serious bacterial infection. Pediatrics. 2001;108(6):1275 1279. 10.1542/peds.108.6.1275) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zarkesh M, Sedaghat F, Heidarzadeh A, Tabrizi M, Bolooki-Moghadam K, Ghesmati S. Diagnostic value of IL-6, CRP, WBC, and absolute neutrophil count to predict serious bacterial infection in febrile infants. Acta Med Iran. 2015;53(7):408 411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Buendía JA, Sánchez-Villamil JP, Urman G. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies of severe bacterial infection in infants with fever without a source. Biomedica. 2016;36(3):406 414. 10.7705/biomedica.v36i3.2718) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Antonio Buendía J, Colantonio L. Costo-Efectividad de la Proteina C Reactiva, Procalcitonina y Escala de Rochester: tres Estrategias Diagnosticas para la Identificacion de Infeccion Bacteriana Severa en Lactantes Febriles sin Foco. Value Health Reg Issues. 2013;2(3):375 380. 10.1016/j.vhri.2013.10.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Buendía JA, Patiño DG. Costs of respiratory syncytial virus hospitalizations in Colombia. Pharmacoecon Open. 2021;5(1):71 76. 10.1007/s41669-020-00218-7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Buendía JA, Polack FP, Patiño DG. Clinical manifestations and outcomes of respiratory syncytial virus infection in children less than two years in Colombia. Indian Pediatr. 2021;58(11):1091 1092. 10.1007/s13312-021-2379-z) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Pantell RH, Roberts KB, Adams WG.et al. Evaluation and management of well-appearing febrile infants 8 to 60 days old. Pediatrics. 2021;148(2):e2021052228. 10.1542/peds.2021-052228) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Content of this journal is licensed under a