Abstract
One in seven couples in developed countries suffers from infertility. Maternal overweight or obesity have detrimental and lasting effects on offspring cardiometabolic health, and although substantially more data are needed, hormonal imbalances in utero resulting from excessive maternal adiposity could also disrupt reproductive programming and affect the future reproductive health of offspring. Therefore, this mini-review evaluates the human epidemiologic evidence that maternal overweight/obesity could be associated with poor reproductive health outcomes in offspring. We searched PubMed for relevant studies using terms such as “maternal obesity” and “reproductive development.” While the human epidemiologic literature is limited, studies have thus far observed that maternal obesity is associated with disrupted external genital development and several other markers of reproductive health across the lifespan. Specifically, maternal obesity is associated with higher risks of hypospadias and cryptorchidism in males and disrupted anogenital distance both in males and females. Maternal obesity has also been linked to earlier age at menarche in daughters, and precocious puberty in both sons and daughters. Finally, daughters of women with overweight or obesity have higher risks of developing polycystic ovarian syndrome, which has implications for fertility. This body of research suggests that in utero exposure to maternal obesity could disrupt reproductive system development, but substantially more evidence is needed, as almost no human epidemiologic studies have evaluated the long-term consequences of maternal obesity with regard to offspring fertility/fecundity.
Keywords: obesity, adiposity, reproduction, programming, maternal
Fertility rates are rapidly declining, as one in seven couples in developed countries suffers from infertility [1, 2]. Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), unresolved reproductive tract infections, and advanced age during pregnancy are well-established environmental and physiological factors driving this trend. Despite these known factors, nearly 30% of infertility cases are attributed to unknown causes [3]. The in utero environment has both short- and long-term consequences for fetal development [4–6], and studies are just beginning to understand the role of the fetal period in the reprogramming of the reproductive system and the implications of this hormonally sensitive period for future reproductive health.
Hormonal disruption in utero is one factor that could have short-term implications for fetal reproductive development and long-term consequences for offspring reproductive capacity. Initial determination and differentiation of the reproductive tract and gonads are guided by hormone-independent genetic factors [7]; at the sixth week of development in humans, the sex-determining region Y (SRY) gene in chromosomal males is expressed and activates SRY box 9, triggering a cascade that results in differentiation of the Sertoli cells [8, 9]. Once this key differentiation is complete, the fetal testes are the primary sites of testosterone and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) synthesis, respectively [7]. Subsequent secretion of testosterone and AMH are the leading drivers of gonadal and reproductive tract development in males [10, 11]; androgens (primarily) maintain the testes, whereas AMH (produced by Sertoli cells) inhibits the development of the female reproductive tract [12–14]. The absence both of testosterone and AMH permits growth of the female reproductive tract and differentiation of the somatic pregranulosa cells in the ovary [9, 15]. This hormonal responsiveness of the developing gonads makes them vulnerable to any perturbations in the maternal-placental hormonal milieu. For instance, female sheep exposed to excessive androgens in utero—in the forms of testosterone or dihydrotestosterone (DHT)—had altered ovarian morphology, particularly the rete ovarii and more frequent appearance of hemorrhagic antral follicles [16]. A later sheep study observed that prenatal exposure to excess testosterone or DHT resulted in larger ovarian artery and wall areas, and thicker ovarian walls in exposed ewes compared to controls [17]. Excessive androgen exposure may also be detrimental to male gonadal development. In male sheep, rams prenatally exposed to testosterone or DHT had morphological alterations in testicular development compared to untreated rams [18]. Given the importance of the maternal hormonal milieu for reproductive development, it is crucial to identify modifiable factors that affect maternal hormone balance, since hormonally dependent changes in gonad development may have long-term implications for offspring lifelong reproductive health.
Pregnant women with obesity (or more precisely, excessive adiposity) have altered levels of sex-steroid hormones, primarily testosterone, which could be detrimental for fetal reproductive development [19–21]. The consequences of maternal obesity with regard to offspring metabolic health are well established [22], but experimental studies have also demonstrated that maternal obesity causes reproductive dysfunction in offspring. In mice, maternal high-fat diet-induced (HFDI) obesity caused infertility in female offspring by impairing ovarian development via a reduction of primordial and antral follicles and elevated levels of genes involved in apoptosis [23]. Another study in HFDI obese rat dams observed that male offspring had lower levels of luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone, reduced sperm concentration, viability, and motility, as well as more sperm abnormalities and testicular reactive oxygen species compared to controls [24]. Maternal obesity also has the potential to disrupt the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis, as its activity in the fetal period is largely driven by maternal hormones [25, 26]. Importantly, the HPG axis is activated throughout the lifespan, including the neonatal period, when gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is released in discrete bursts to stimulate secretion of LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) [25]. Experimental studies have demonstrated that the adipokine leptin secreted by adipose tissue stimulates GnRH release [25], and in vitro studies have demonstrated that insulin and leptin can also activate the HPG axis and modulate GnRH release [27]. Because pregnant women have altered concentrations of leptin and insulin [28, 29], there is strong potential for maternal obesity/adiposity to affect the fetal HPG axis, which could alter gonadal and reproductive development.
While the human epidemiologic literature is somewhat sparse, currently available studies have broadly supported the potential for maternal obesity to affect offspring reproductive development in utero, using various markers of reproductive health across the lifespan. Specifically, in the present review, we discuss human epidemiologic studies that considered associations of maternal obesity or adiposity with newborn markers of gonadal development, precocious menarche in daughters, puberty onset in daughters and sons, and markers of reproductive capacity in adult children. We conclude by providing insight into potential challenges related to evaluating the long-term implications of these findings in human epidemiologic studies and provide brief recommendations for future directions in the field.
Search Strategies
We searched PubMed using combinations of various keywords including “maternal obesity,” “fetal reproductive programming,” “gonadal development,” “precocious puberty,” “age at menarche,” “cancer,” and “infertility.” Studies were included if they assessed associations between maternal obesity (either as a clinical cutoff or as a continuous variable using body mass index; BMI) and reproduction-related end points in offspring (eg, cryptorchidism, hypospadias, age at menarche, puberty onset, disrupted steroid hormone levels, biomarkers of reproductive capacity, or development of reproductive organ–specific cancer). This review focuses on studies in human populations, but we discuss experimental studies when observational studies were not available or if additional support was needed for interpretation or mechanistic insight into findings from human epidemiologic studies.
Maternal Obesity and Reproduction-related Outcomes in Offspring
External Indicators of Altered Reproductive Development
The anogenital distance (AGD) may be a meaningful external biomarker of disrupted reproductive system development. AGD is a sexually dimorphic trait, as males tend to have a longer AGD compared to females, and this has been observed in experimental and human epidemiologic studies [30, 31]. Furthermore, studies in rodents have implicated the actions of androgens as the primary driving force behind the development and differentiation of the AGD [32–34]. Due to the disrupted sex-steroid hormone milieu in pregnant women with obesity [20, 35], it is plausible that exposure to maternal obesity could disrupt fetal reproductive tract development, which can be evaluated early by assessing newborn AGD. Although many human studies have considered associations of environmental factors or polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) with AGD [36–39], we recently also reported that select measures of maternal obesity and adiposity were associated with changes in AGD independent of maternal PCOS diagnosis [40]. We characterized maternal obesity using several measures, including prepregnancy and early-pregnancy BMI, prepregnancy and early-pregnancy body weight, hip and waist circumferences, visceral (central) adiposity, and total adiposity. Using data from 450 mother/newborn dyads, we observed that higher prepregnancy and early-pregnancy BMI, body weight, hip circumference, and visceral fat level were associated with elongated (androgenized) anoclitoral and anofourchette AGD in newborn girls; no associations were observed in newborn boys [40]. Conversely, another recent study in 597 Chinese infants observed no association between maternal prepregnancy BMI and AGD in boys or girls [41]. Compared to our study, this study discussed having too few women with obesity to consider this group individually, whereas 22% of the women in our study had obesity. Additionally, the study by Wang et al [41] controlled for newborn birth weight in covariate-adjusted models, whereas we normalized AGD measures for birth length, as birth weight could mediate (and thus underestimate) the association of maternal BMI with AGD. Finally, the second study evaluated the combined effect of maternal BMI with gestational weight gain, whereas we did not take this approach, as gestational weight gain was not associated with AGD in our study. Our study provides evidence that maternal adiposity could affect fetal reproductive tract development, but additional studies are needed to understand whether AGD provides an early detection tool for future reproductive dysfunction.
Maternal obesity has also been implicated as a risk factor for birth defects and genital anomalies in offspring, including hypospadias and cryptorchidism [42–44]. In males, hypospadias (urethral opening not on the tip of the penis) and cryptorchidism (undescended testes) [45] are potential external indicators of altered reproductive programming and have the potential to cause infertility due to their association with impaired semen flow [46, 47] and compromised germ cell maturation [48], respectively. A case-control study among infants born between 1997 and 2002 from the US National Birth Defects Prevention Study evaluated maternal obesity as a risk factor for structural birth defects in infants, as confirmed by clinical geneticists. The study reported that sons of women with overweight or obesity had higher odds of developing hypospadias compared to sons of women who were normal weight (odds ratio [OR]: 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.54 and OR: 1.33; 95% CI, 1.03-1.72, respectively) [44]. Similarly, a Swedish register-based study of male singleton infants (n = 1 055 705) born between 1992 and 2012 also observed a positive association between maternal overweight or obesity with the risk of cryptorchidism and hypospadias [42]. Although the possible mechanisms underlying these associations remain elusive, these studies appear to confirm experimental models reporting that elevated maternal adiposity disrupts the development of the reproductive system [16–18, 23, 24, 49, 50].
Precocious Onset of Menarche
Menarche, the beginning of menstruation, marks the start of female fertility and relies on the coordination of the HPG axis [51]. Age at first menarche has continued to decline in the United States and other developed countries [52]. Precocious onset of menarche poses a concern for short- and long-term health because early menarche has been associated with complications such as cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, as well as higher rates of ectopic pregnancies, breast cancer, and miscarriage [53–57]. The potential effects of early menarche extend beyond physical health; in human epidemiologic studies, an earlier age at menarche is associated with both depressive and antisocial behaviors in adulthood [56]. Puberty and menarche vary largely between individuals, with menarche having a known genetic component [58, 59]. However, there is an established link between lifestyle factors like adolescent obesity and an earlier age at menarche [60–62], and several studies have suggested that maternal overweight or obesity is also associated with age at menarche in daughters independent of adolescent weight status. In the 1979 US National Longitudinal Survey of Youth study, 2497 women born between 1957 and 1964 reported their age at menarche and their mother's prepregnancy BMI. Maternal prepregnancy overweight/obesity was associated with an earlier age at menarche in the daughters (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06-1.36), even when accounting for the daughters' prepubertal BMI [63]. Another study of 597 US women in the Collaborative Perinatal Project (enrolled 1959-1965) observed that daughters of women with prepregnancy obesity had higher odds of menarche before age 12 years (OR: 3.3; 95% CI, 1.1-10.0) compared to women whose mothers were normal weight or underweight; results were not attenuated when formal mediation models evaluated daughters' BMI at age 7 as a mediator [64]. Further supporting this phenomenon, in a 1991 to 1992 prospective population-based birth study of 2086 mother-daughter dyads in Britain, daughters of women with prepregnancy overweight or obesity had a higher risk of early menarche (relative risk [RR]: 1.37; 95% CI, 1.08-1.91 and RR: 1.34; 95% CI, 0.93-1.91, respectively) [65], compared to daughters of women who were normal weight. Although the underlying mechanisms of these findings are poorly understood, there is reason to postulate that the effect of maternal obesity on precocious menarche stems from the response of the HPG axis to excess fuel availability in utero, which could signal the potential for earlier reproductive capacity [66]. Thus, while there is certainly a hereditary component to the onset of menstruation, external factors (including elevated maternal adiposity) could be important contributors to the downward trend in age at menarche.
Premature Adrenarche
Adrenarche is the maturational increase in the secretion of androgens in early and mid-childhood, occurring both in males and females [67]. During adrenarche, the adrenal gland increases secretion of dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS) and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), which can be converted into androgens in the adrenal gland, peripheral adipose tissues [68], the ovary, and the testes [67, 69]. Premature adrenarche is the early secretion of androgen precursors and occurrence of early presentation of androgen-associated signs of puberty before age 8 years in girls and age 9 years in boys [67]. While not included in the Tanner stages, adrenarche is partly responsible for the development of pubic hair (pubarche), axillary hair, and acne [70]. The intrauterine environment has lasting consequences for fetal growth and the development of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis [71, 72], which is key in regulating DHEA and DHEAS secretion [72, 73]. Epidemiologic studies in humans [74] and experimental studies in rats [75] and macaques [76] indicate that the programming of the HPA is sensitive to the maternal environment. For example, prior studies have observed associations between maternal PCOS status—regardless of prepregnancy BMI—and early onset of adrenarche in girls (but not boys) [70]. Similarly, phthalates have been associated with increased risk of premature adrenarche both in girls and boys [77]. These studies indicate that the maternal environment may program the premature onset of adrenarche. Although no studies (to our knowledge) have considered the relationship between maternal obesity and premature adrenarche, several studies have observed associations between birth size and timing of adrenarche [71, 73]. Given that women with overweight or obesity are either more likely to have small for gestational age [78, 79] or large for gestational age infants [80, 81], and the known role of the HPA in birth size [82–84], there is reason for future experimental and epidemiologic studies to consider the role of maternal obesity or adiposity in premature adrenarche.
Precocious Onset of Puberty
Beyond menarche, and potentially adrenarche, maternal obesity has been associated with precocious puberty both in sons and daughters. Pubertal onset is clinically characterized using the Tanner stages in the following categories: pubic hair development (boys and girls), breast development (girls), and growth of the external genitalia (boys), with stages one and five defined as “prepubertal” and “adult-form”, respectively [85]. Additional puberty-adjacent criteria—like acne and nocturnal emissions—have also been evaluated [86, 87]. Early onset of puberty is concerning because it could increase the risk of developing breast and endometrial cancer in women, and prostate cancer in men [88]. Additionally, precocious puberty has been associated with poorer psychosocial adjustment in boys and girls, and behavioral problems in boys [89]. A 2010 study of 2661 daughters of women recruited in Great Britain from 1991 to 1992 observed that daughters of women with overweight or obesity tended to enter Tanner stages two and three of breast development before those born to normal-weight women [90]. Interestingly, daughters of women with prepregnancy overweight, but not obesity, tended to develop pubic hair earlier than daughters of normal-weight women [90]. Another study recruited 15 602 children born between 2000 and 2003 from the Danish National Birth Cohort to evaluate the relationship between maternal prepregnancy obesity and the timing of puberty in offspring. The authors reported daughters of women with prepregnancy obesity tended to achieve all pubertal milestones earlier and tended to start puberty overall −3.2 (95% CI, −2.1 to −4.2) months before daughters of normal-weight women [86]. Daughters of women with prepregnancy overweight experienced similar outcomes to daughters of women with obesity for all pubertal milestones and tended to start puberty −2.6 (95% CI, −1.8 to 3.3) months before daughter of normal-weight women [86].
In the same Danish study, compared to sons of normal-weight women, sons of women with obesity experienced axillary hair development, acne, and voice cracks −4.4 (95% CI, −6.1 to −2.7), −2.5 (95% CI, −4.0 to −0.9), and −2.2 (95% CI, −3.8 to −0.6) months earlier, respectively, and tended to enter the third, fourth, and fifth Tanner pubic hair stages −1.7 (95% CI, −3.1 to −0.4), −1.7 (95% CI, −3.0 to −0.4), and −2.0 (95% CI, −3.6 to −0.3) months earlier, respectively [86]. Finally, another Danish study used data from 2552 sons in a mother-child cohort established between 1984 to 1987 to evaluate the association between high maternal BMI and onset of puberty in sons, which was characterized by experiencing acne, shaving facial hair, voice cracks, and nocturnal emissions in place of Tanner staging [87]. The study observed that sons whose mothers had prepregnancy obesity started regularly shaving −0.69 years earlier compared to sons of normal-weight mothers (95% CI, −1.17 to −0.21) [87]. In analyses removing sons of underweight mothers, maternal obesity was also associated with an earlier age at acne development and nocturnal emission [87]. The literature suggests that maternal overweight or obesity could significantly alter the programming of puberty, so that it occurs earlier in boys and girls using both clinical Tanner stages and markers associated with the pubertal transition. Additional experimental and human epidemiologic studies will be needed to understand other potential implications of precocious puberty and whether the trend can be reversed or mitigated.
Direct and Indirect Markers of Impaired Reproductive Capacity in Females and Males
Although the evidence is limited (especially from human epidemiologic studies), maternal obesity could have lasting implications for offspring reproductive health and capacity. Experimental studies have reported that maternal obesity can impair reproductive capacity both in female and male offspring. One study in rats observed that maternal HFDI obesity was associated with signs of reduced fertility in female offspring [49]. Specifically, offspring of dams that were 28% overweight (compared to the controls) had higher ovarian weight compared to controls, and offspring of dams that were both 17% and 28% overweight had fewer primordial and primary follicles, fewer healthy oocytes, and a higher ovulation rate compared to control offspring [49]. In a later study, the male offspring of HFDI obese rats displayed decreased fertility and poor sexual maturity [50]. Specifically, male offspring of dams that were 35% overweight had fewer spermatozoa and spermatogonia, as well as a higher percentage of sperm with amorphous head curvature compared to the control males [50]. Another study in rats observed similar sperm abnormalities in males of overweight dams compared to those of control dams, and also reported that male offspring of overweight dams had decreased fertility rates (number of sired litters) compared to male offspring of control dams [24]. Results from these experimental studies suggest that excessive maternal adiposity may disrupt the development of the reproductive system, potentially with deleterious consequences for future reproductive capacity due to suboptimal gonadal function and morphology.
To our knowledge, only one human epidemiologic study has investigated whether maternal adiposity is associated with an elevated risk of offspring infertility. The Danish Healthy Habits for Two study included 9232 children of women enrolled between 1984 and 1987, with fertility status data collected from 2 patient registries through 2018 [91]. Authors reported that sons of women with overweight had higher odds of infertility compared to sons of normal-weight women (OR: 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.9). Surprisingly, despite the experimental evidence, there were no associations of maternal overweight or obesity with infertility in daughters (OR: 0.9; 95% CI, 0.7-1.2) [91]. Similarly, in a study of 367 Danish women born between 1988 and 1989, maternal overweight/obesity was not associated altered follicle count in daughters—an indirect measure of fertility [92]. However, daughters of women with overweight did have lower levels of DHEAS and estradiol than women born to normal-weight mothers [92]. Although depleted follicle count, decreased oocyte health, hormonal disruption, poor sperm quality, and low sperm count are not definitive predictors of infertility, they could be markers of decrease fecundity [93–95]. Due to the dearth of evidence from human epidemiological studies, more research is needed to corroborate or refute previous findings, especially given the growing prevalence of obesity among pregnant individuals.
Additional Diseases and Syndromes Across the Lifespan
Beyond the well-characterized reproductive endpoints discussed earlier, elevated maternal adiposity could also contribute to conditions that have known detrimental effects on reproduction. PCOS—an endocrine condition in which the ovaries are enlarged and are characterized by several cysts of varying size—is often accompanied by obesity and insulin resistance [96]. Many studies have reported that daughters of women with overweight or obesity had a higher risk of developing PCOS compared to daughters of normal-weight women, even after accounting for maternal PCOS status (HR overweight: 1.52; 95% CI, 1.36-1.70 and HR obesity: 1.97; 95% CI, 1.61-2.41) [97], suggesting that maternal obesity could be an independent determinant of PCOS development in daughters. Maternal obesity could program PCOS in utero due to the compromised hormonal milieu resulting from excess maternal adiposity. One proposed mechanism is that an abundance of maternal adipose tissue could disrupt mitochondrial steroidogenic function and subsequently alter the concentrations of sex-steroid hormones in the placenta [97, 98]. Regardless of its etiology, PCOS has been implicated in subfertility or infertility in women, likely due to hyperandrogenism and oligo-anovulation [99], so it is important to understand whether maternal obesity is a potential preventable factor contributing to PCOS.
Finally, receiving a cancer diagnosis at any life stage could have implications for reproductive capacity because of the type of cancer (malignant or benign), the location (reproductive tract or not), and the therapy undertaken to treat the disease [100]. Although few studies are available in humans regarding maternal obesity and reproductive tract cancers, studies in mice have shown that maternal HFDI obesity promoted the progression of prostate cancer development in male offspring [101] and ovarian cancer in female offspring [102]. As the prevalence of maternal overweight and obesity increases, future human epidemiologic studies are needed to ascertain if the experimental findings translate to humans. Increased risk of nonreproductive tract cancers could also affect reproductive capacity, as chemotherapy and radiation have been associated with premature ovarian failure and miscarriage due to incidental uterine radiation in women and cessation of sperm production and sperm DNA damage in men [103–106]. In epidemiologic studies, maternal obesity has been shown to increase the offspring's risk of developing cancer in childhood and adulthood [107, 108]. An analysis of longitudinal data from the Helsinki Birth Cohort Study (children born 1934-1944) and the Finnish Cancer Registry (followed through 2006) found a positive association between exposure to higher maternal BMI and risk of developing cancer in sons [107]. When maternal BMI was evaluated continuously, a 1-unit increase in maternal BMI was associated with a 2.50% higher risk (HR: 1.025) of developing cancer in sons (95% CI, 0.999-1.053) but not daughters [107]. In a more recent US study, childhood cancer cases (age ≤ 5 years) were identified from the California Cancer Registry from 1988 to 2013 and matched controls were selected using birth certificates from the same time period [109]. Overall, children of mothers with overweight had 27% higher odds (OR: 1.27; 95% CI, 1.01-1.59) of developing leukemia compared to children of normal-weight women [109], and substantially more needs to be understood about the long-term implication of cancer treatment for children's long-term reproductive health.
Summary, Discussion, and Future Directions
Generally, the current human epidemiologic literature supports that maternal obesity is associated with certain markers of reproductive health across the lifespan (Tables 1-4; Fig. 1). Specifically, maternal obesity has been associated with disrupted AGD both in boys and girls, as well as higher risks of hypospadias and cryptorchidism in boys (see Table 1). Additionally, daughters of women with obesity tend to have an earlier age at menarche, and sons and daughters of women with overweight or obesity both tend to start puberty earlier (see Table 2). Data related to frank infertility in offspring of women with overweight/obesity are limited, although there is some evidence for disrupted markers of reproductive capacity in adult offspring (see Table 3). Finally, daughters of women with overweight or obesity are at an elevated risk of developing PCOS, but data related to gynecologic/urologic cancers in offspring are limited to rodent models (see Table 4). Overall, based on evidence from the current literature, it is possible that excessive adiposity during pregnancy could disrupt fetal gonadal, reproductive tract, and HPG axis development via altered maternal sex-steroid hormone levels, but substantially more needs to be understood about the long-term implications of this disruption for offspring reproductive capacity (see Fig. 1).
Table 1.
Studies on the relationship between maternal obesity and external markers of reproductive development
| Outcome | Exposure | Sample size | Study design, country | Covariates | Main findings | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newborn AGD | Maternal prepregnancy and early-pregnancy BMI and weight, waist and hip circumference, waist/hip and waist/height ratios, body fat %, visceral fat level, muscle %, body fat/muscle ratio; evaluated continuously | 450 | Prospective cohort, US | Race/ethnicity, parity, fetal sex, first trimester smoking status, age, average gestational diet quality, and perceived stress | Daughters of women with higher prepregnancy and early pregnancy BMI and body weight, hip circumference, and visceral fat level tended to have longer anofourchette and anoclitoral AGD | [40] |
| Newborn AGD | Maternal prepregnancy BMI (overweight/obesity: BMI ≥ 24) and GWG (inadequate, adequate, excessive) | 556 | Prospective cohort, China | GWG, age, total wks gestation, education, parity, folic acid intake, passive smoking, and infant birth weight | Prepregnancy BMI was not associated with AGD. Sons of women with excessive GWG tended to have shorter anopenile AGD than sons of women with adequate GWG | [41] |
| Hypospadias | Maternal prepregnancy obesity (overweight: BMI 25-29.9; obesity: BMI ≥ 30) | 1146 cases 3904 controls |
Case-control, US | Age, ethnicity, parity, smoking 1 month before conception, and folic acid intake 1 month before conception | Sons of women with obesity had higher odds of developing hypospadias | [44] |
| Cryptorchidism and hypospadias | Maternal early-pregnancy BMI (overweight: BMI 25-29.9; obesity class 1: BMI 30-34.9; obesity class 2: BMI 35-39.9; obesity class 3: BMI ≥ 40) | 1 055 705 | Prospective cohort, Sweden | Age, parity, cigarette smoking in early pregnancy, education, origin of birth, and newborn calendar y at birth | Sons of women with overweight or obesity class 1-3 had increased risks of developing cryptorchidism and hypospadias | [42] |
Abbreviations: AGD, anogenital distance; BMI, body mass index; GWG, gestational weight gain; US, United States.
Table 4.
Studies on the association between maternal obesity and reproduction-relevant diseases or syndromes
| Diseases and syndromes Rodents | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Exposure | Sample size | Study design | Covariates | Main findings | Citation |
| Males: prostate cancer | Maternal HFDI overweight | 36 per group | Experimental mouse models using HFD or control diet | Not applicable | Offspring of dams fed HFD had higher prostate cancer tumor formation rates and higher mortality rates compared to offspring of controls at age 20 wk | [101] |
| Females: ovarian cancer | Maternal HDFI overweight | N/A | Experimental mouse models using HFD or control diet | Not applicable | Offspring of dams fed HFD had higher organ-specific tumor burdens compared to offspring of controls and had higher expression of CXCL13 cytokine reported in ovarian cancer cells | [102] |
| Humans | ||||||
| PCOS | Maternal prepregnancy BMI (overweight: BMI 25-29.9; obesity: BMI ≥ 30) | 3728 | Prospective cohort, Sweden | Maternal age, maternal parity, years of involuntary childlessness before index pregnancy, and maternal diabetes or preeclampsia at index pregnancy, maternal education level, country of birth, and maternal PCOS diagnosis | Daughters of women with overweight or obesity had higher risks of developing PCOS compared to daughters of normal-weight women | [97] |
| Cancer in adulthood | Maternal prepregnancy BMI, evaluated continuously | 13 345 | Cohort, Finland | Maternal age, maternal parity and childhood and adult socioeconomic status, education, and income | Sons of women with high BMI had higher odds of cancer development compared to sons of normal-weight women No associations observed in daughters |
[107] |
| Cancer in childhood | Maternal prepregnancy BMI (overweight: BMI 25-29.9; obesity: BMI ≥ 30) | 11 149 cases 270 147 controls |
Case-control, US | Birth y, maternal and paternal race/ethnicity, and maternal age | Children of women with overweight or obesity had higher odds of developing childhood leukemia compared to children of normal-weight women | [109] |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; HFD, high-fat diet; HFDI, high-fat diet–induced; N/A, not available; PCOS, polycystic ovarian syndrome; US, United States.
Figure 1.
Elevated maternal adiposity is associated with maternal hormone disruption (specifically sex-steroid hormones), which could contribute to altered gonadal and genital development, precocious puberty and menarche, poor sperm quality, and elevated risk of polycystic ovarian syndrome and cancers in offspring. Substantially more data from experimental and human epidemiologic studies are needed to understand if these developmental disruptions contribute to offspring infertility later in life.
Table 2.
Studies on the relationship between maternal obesity and precocious menarche and puberty
| Outcome | Exposure | Sample size | Study design, country | Covariates | Main findings | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early menarche | ||||||
| Age at menarche | Maternal prepregnancy BMI (overweight: BMI 25-29.9; obesity: BMI ≥ 30) and GWG (continuous and inadequate, adequate, excessive) | 2497 | Prospective cohort, US | Maternal socioeconomic status, maternal race/ethnicity, maternal parity, maternal smoking, maternal age at menarche, breastfeeding, BMI at age 7 | Daughters of women with overweight or obesity had higher risk of earlier menarche | [63] |
| Age at menarche | Maternal prepregnancy BMI (overweight: BMI 25-29.9; obesity: BMI ≥ 30) | 597 | Prospective cohort, US | Maternal age at menarche, maternal parity, socioeconomic status, race, and study site | Daughters of women with obesity had higher odds of menarche before age 12 | [64] |
| Age at menarche, pubarche, and thelarche | Maternal prepregnancy BMI (continuous and overweight: BMI 25-29.9; obesity: BMI ≥ 30) and GWG (continuous and inadequate, adequate, excessive) | 2086 | Prospective cohort, UK | Maternal age, parity, socioeconomic status, smoking, maternal age at menarche, and ethnicity | Daughters of women with prepregnancy overweight or obesity had higher risks of early menarche. Daughters of women with higher GWG had higher risks of earlier menarche. Higher maternal prepregnancy BMI was associated with earlier pubarche and thelarche | [65] |
| Precocious Puberty | ||||||
| Daughters: Tanner stages and age at menarche | Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI (overweight: BMI 25-29.9; obesity: BMI ≥ 30) | 2661 | Prospective cohort, Great Britain | Maternal menarche before age 12, maternal smoking status, and maternal parity, maternal education, maternal race, and maternal age | Daughters of women with obesity or overweight tended to attain higher breast stages and menarche earlier than daughters born to normal-weight women. Daughters of women with obesity tended to develop pubic hair earlier than daughters of normal-weight women | [90] |
| Daughters: Tanner stages, axillary hair, acne, menarche. Sons: Tanner stages, voice break, first ejaculation, acne, and axillary hair |
Maternal prepregnancy BMI (overweight: BMI 25-29.9; obesity: BMI ≥ 30) | 15 602 | Prospective cohort, Denmark | Maternal alcohol consumption and smoking in first trimester, highest educational class of parents, maternal age at menarche, maternal age, parity, and cohabitation of parents during pregnancy | Daughters of women with prepregnancy obesity tended to experience all pubertal milestones, and start puberty earlier overall, than daughters of normal-weight women. Daughters of women with overweight experienced similar outcomes Sons of women with prepregnancy obesity tended to experience voice break, acne, and axillary and pubic hair growth earlier than sons of normal-weight women |
[86] |
| Sons: age of regular shaving, voice break, acne onset, and first nocturnal emission | Maternal prepregnancy BMI (overweight: BMI 25-29.9; obesity: BMI ≥ 30) | 2522 | Prospective cohort, Denmark | Maternal age, parental habitation status, delivery location, maternal chronic disease status, maternal smoking during pregnancy, maternal alcohol consumption during pregnancy, family socioeconomic status, and BMI in 2005 | Sons of women with prepregnancy obesity tended to start shaving earlier than others. Sons born to women with obesity tended to develop acne and experience nocturnal emissions earlier than sons of normal-weight women | [87] |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; GWG, gestational weight gain; UK, United Kingdom; US, United States.
Table 3.
Studies on the association between maternal obesity and direct and indirect markers of impaired reproductive capacity
| Direct and indirect markers Rodents | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Exposure | Sample size | Study design | Covariates | Main findings | Citation |
| Females: ovarian reserve, follicle development, and ovulation | Maternal HFDI overweight | 8-10 per group | Experimental rat models using HFD or control diet | Not applicable | Offspring of dams with 28% or 17% overweight had fewer healthy oocytes and fewer primordial and primary oocytes Offspring of dams with 28% overweight had higher ovarian weights |
[49] |
| Males: sperm quality and concentration | Maternal HDFI overweight | 8-10 per group | Experimental rat models using HFD or control diet | Not applicable | Offspring of dams with 35% overweight had fewer spermatogonia and spermatozoa compared to offspring of controls and had a higher % of sperm with amorphous head curvature | [50] |
| Humans | ||||||
| Sons: infertility Daughters: infertility |
Maternal prepregnancy BMI (continuous and overweight: BMI 25-29.9; obesity: BMI ≥ 30) | 9232 | Prospective cohort, Denmark | Maternal age, maternal parity, parental cohabitation status, maternal smoking and alcohol consumption during pregnancy, and parental socioeconomic status | Sons of women with overweight had higher odds of infertility compared to sons born to normal-weight women No association observed between maternal overweight and infertility in daughters |
[91] |
| Daughters: age at menarche, sex steroid hormone profile, and ovarian follicle count | Maternal prepregnancy BMI, evaluated continuously | 367 | Prospective cohort, Denmark | Maternal smoking in pregnancy, maternal socioeconomic status, maternal age, and maternal parity | Daughters of women with high BMI tended to experience early menarche compared to others No associations observed between maternal BMI and ovarian follicle count Daughters of women with higher BMI tended to have lower levels of estradiol and DHEAS than daughters of women with lower BMI |
[92] |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; DHEAS, dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate; HFD, high-fat diet; HFDI, high-fat diet–induced.
Despite the rising obesity rates among reproductive-age women, the in utero genesis of reproductive disorders in human populations has not been thoroughly investigated in the context of maternal obesity. Part of this stems from the lack of human epidemiologic studies evaluating maternal obesity and its association with offspring reproductive development or fertility/fecundity. As with other long-term health outcomes, there are substantial challenges related to conducting longitudinal human epidemiologic studies that consider an in utero exposure (maternal obesity) and adulthood health conditions (infertility or other reproductive disorders). Beyond the inherent challenges related to long-term follow-up in human populations, it is equally difficult to measure longitudinally and understand the role of the many factors that target the reproductive tract postnatally. Specifically, offspring health factors that are caused by elevated maternal adiposity and that also lead to reproductive dysfunction are likely mediators of the relationship of interest, and not accounting for such a factor can overestimate the effect of gestational exposure on maternal obesity. However, accounting for such a factor as a confounder could severely underestimate the effect of maternal adiposity on child reproductive end points. The best example of this is the role of child obesity/adiposity in the relationship between maternal obesity and offspring reproductive end points. Many of the studies we reviewed that consider later-life reproductive outcomes had access to child BMI data and used various sensitivity analyses to understand the role of child obesity in the relationship of interest [63, 87]. However, only one study performed formal mediation analyses to evaluate the role of childhood BMI in the relationship between maternal prepregnancy BMI and earlier menarche in daughters [64]. As the relationship was not attenuated when daughters' BMI was included as a mediator, these results provide more robust evidence for an in utero effect of maternal obesity, independent of the child's current obesity status. Moving forward, it may be important to routinely test whether child BMI mediates associations of maternal obesity with child reproductive end points, and to additionally consider other offspring health factors that could complicate the main association. As with other long-term outcomes, large population-based studies (such as those from Scandinavian national birth cohorts and others) could alleviate some of these concerns, as they collect copious prenatal and postnatal data on offspring. Additionally, as we have discussed in this review, external indicators such as AGD and genital malformations may serve as sentinels for disruptions within the reproductive system that can be tracked postnatally. Although not many studies collect these data at birth, those that do could make a concerted effort to follow children into their reproductive years to understand if these early-life markers provide valid biomarkers of reproductive capacity.
It may also be important to consider the potential implications of chemical exposure when considering the relationship between maternal obesity and offspring reproductive development. Many EDCs are lipophilic (accumulate in adipose tissue) and are also metabolic disruptors. However, to confound associations of maternal obesity with child reproductive development, they must both cause maternal obesity and alter reproductive development. Although this is certainly possible, additional thought may need to be given before taking this approach. An alternative approach could consider whether exposure to EDCs creates a double burden by evaluating whether babies or children additionally exposed to EDCs are at an even greater risk of reproductive disorders in response to maternal obesity. Given the challenges of considering lifespan exposure to EDCs, it may be important to first investigate these relationships using experimental models.
Another important future goal is to unravel the potential biological mechanisms through which maternal obesity disrupts reproductive programming, which would provide support for additional human epidemiologic investigations. One current challenge related to experimental models is that more care must be taken when selecting appropriate models to approximate human reproductive development. For instance, rodent models are often used because they reproduce quickly and plentifully, but this may also make them poor models for studying some aspects of human reproduction, including the later stages of pregnancy [110]. The development of the uterus also differs between mice and humans [111], which presents a challenge for interpretation and translation of the hormonally driven events in mice that do not occur, or simply have not yet been identified, in humans [111]. Importantly, there are also challenges for modeling maternal obesity itself, which occurs slowly and chronically in humans, but (typically) quickly and acutely in rodent models. Most previous studies induce obesity in dams via an HFD because obesity is a chronic condition and laboratory rodents have a short lifespan that does not allow for the slow development of obesity. Additionally, there are no strict criteria in animals distinguishing overweight vs obesity [50] or consensus on which HFD is most appropriate [112], which presents an obstacle for interpretation and translation of findings. The use of a HFD also does not quite accurately represent the human Western diet, which is low in fiber and high in sugar, salt, and fat [112]. Additionally, women with obesity do not necessarily always consume Western/HF diets in pregnancy, thus HFD feeding in rodent models could mask the diet-independent effect of obesity on reproductive development. To address concerns around modeling of reproductive development, nonhuman primate models may be needed to address some of the more physiological aspects of reproductive development, both short and long term. In any chosen experimental model, more focus will be needed on maternal obesity rather than the dietary intervention. This may require longer preconception HFD or Western diet treatment, or again, the use of nonhuman primates, which have been shown to spontaneously develop obesity and experience similar physiologic changes to humans, especially in pregnancy [113–115].
Conclusion
Maternal obesity has known deleterious consequences for offspring cardiometabolic development, but recent experimental studies suggest that maternal obesity could also impair offspring fertility and health by disrupting gonadal development and damaging sperm production and programming ovarian dysfunction. In human epidemiologic studies, maternal obesity has been associated with altered AGD, genital malformations in boys, early menarche, precocious puberty in boys and girls, PCOS, and cancer. However, epidemiologic studies directly linking maternal obesity exposure in utero to long-term fertility/reproductive health in offspring are limited. Given the limitations of current experimental models and the paucity of human epidemiologic research, it is critical that future studies evaluating the effects of maternal obesity go beyond the long-term metabolic outcomes to also consider the reproductive health and capacity of offspring.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Dr Humphrey Yao from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences for his generous discussion and review of this manuscript.
Abbreviations
- AMH
anti-Müllerian hormone
- AGD
anogenital distance
- BMI
body mass index
- DHEA
dehydroepiandrosterone
- DHEAS
dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate
- DHT
dihydrotestosterone
- EDC
endocrine-disrupting chemical
- FSH
follicle-stimulating hormone
- HPA
hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal
- HPG
hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal
- HR
hazard ratio
- HFD
high-fat diet
- HFDI
high-fat diet–induced
- GnRH
gonadotropin-releasing hormone
- LH
luteinizing hormone
- OR
odds ratio
- PCOS
polycystic ovarian syndrome
- RR
relative risk
Contributor Information
Maria E Cinzori, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; Institute for Integrative Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Rita S Strakovsky, Email: strakovs@msu.edu, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; Institute for Integrative Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Financial Support
This work was supported by the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIH/NIEHS grant Nos. R00 ES024795 and T32 ES007255), and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (grant No. R03 HD100775). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the grantee and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. This project was also supported by the US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture and Michigan AgBioResearch.
Disclosures
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Data Availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no data sets were generated or analyzed during the present study.
References
- 1. Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zhu L, Zhou B, Zhu X, et al. Association between body mass Index and female infertility in the United States: data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013-2018. Int J Gen Med. 2022;15:1821–1831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ray A, Shah A, Gudi A, Homburg R. Unexplained infertility: an update and review of practice. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24(6):591–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Barnes FL. The effects of the early uterine environment on the subsequent development of embryo and fetus. Theriogenology. 2000;53(2):649–658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Barnes SK, Ozanne SE. Pathways linking the early environment to long-term health and lifespan. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2011;106(1):323–336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Strauss RS. Effects of the intrauterine environment on childhood growth. Br Med Bull. 1997;53(1):81–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Byskov AG. Differentiation of mammalian embryonic gonad. Physiol Rev. 1986;66(1):71–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Sinclair AH, Berta P, Palmer MS, et al. A gene from the human sex-determining region encodes a protein with homology to a conserved DNA-binding motif. Nature. 1990;346(6281):240–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sreenivasan R, Gonen N, Sinclair A. SOX genes and their role in disorders of sex development. Sex Dev. Published online June 27, 2022. doi: 10.1159/000524453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Jost A. Problems of fetal endocrinology: the gonadal and hypophyseal hormones. Recent Progr Hormon Res. 1953;8:379–413. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Jost A, Vigier B, Prépin J, Perchellet JP. Studies on sex differentiation in mammals. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1973;29:1–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Jamin SP, Arango NA, Mishina Y, Hanks MC, Behringer RR. Requirement of Bmpr1a for Müllerian duct regression during male sexual development. Nat Genet. 2002;32(3):408–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Silva MSB, Giacobini P. New insights into anti-Müllerian hormone role in the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and neuroendocrine development. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78(1):1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Zhao F, Yao HH. A tale of two tracts: history, current advances, and future directions of research on sexual differentiation of reproductive tracts. Biol Reprod. 2019;101(3):602–616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Niu W, Spradling AC. Two distinct pathways of pregranulosa cell differentiation support follicle formation in the mouse ovary. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(33):20015–20026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Smith P, Steckler TL, Veiga-Lopez A, Padmanabhan V. Developmental programming: Differential effects of prenatal testosterone and dihydrotestosterone on follicular recruitment, depletion of follicular reserve, and ovarian morphology in sheep. Biol Reprod. 2009;80(4):726–736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ortega HH, Veiga-Lopez A, Sreedharan S, del Luján Velázquez MM, Salvetti NR, Padmanabhan V. Developmental programming: does prenatal steroid excess disrupt the ovarian VEGF system in sheep? Biol Reprod. 2015;93(3):58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Bormann CL, Smith GD, Padmanabhan V, Lee TM. Prenatal testosterone and dihydrotestosterone exposure disrupts ovine testicular development. Reproduction. 2011;142(1):167–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Gomes L, Basu S, Minium J, Hauguel-de-Mouzon S, Catalano P. 48: Obesity in pregnancy is associated with decreased placental estradiol biosynthesis. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2014;210(1):S32. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Maliqueo M, Cruz G, Espina C, et al. Obesity during pregnancy affects sex steroid concentrations depending on fetal gender. Int J Obes (Lond). 2017;41(11):1636–1645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Rehman R, Hussain Z, Faraz N. Effect of estradiol levels on pregnancy outcome in obese women. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2012;24(3-4):3–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Godfrey KM, Reynolds RM, Prescott SL, et al. Influence of maternal obesity on the long-term health of offspring. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(1):53–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Jungheim ES, Schoeller EL, Marquard KL, Louden ED, Schaffer JE, Moley KH. Diet-induced obesity model: abnormal oocytes and persistent growth abnormalities in the offspring. Endocrinology. 2010;151(8):4039–4046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Rodríguez-González GL, Vega CC, Boeck L, et al. Maternal obesity and overnutrition increase oxidative stress in male rat offspring reproductive system and decrease fertility. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015;39(4):549–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Dwyer AA, Quinton R. Anatomy and physiology of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. In: Advanced Practice in Endocrinology Nursing. Springer; 2019:839–852. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Grumbach MM. A window of opportunity: the diagnosis of gonadotropin deficiency in the male infant. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(5):3122–3127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Burcelin R, Thorens B, Glauser M, Gaillard RC, Pralong FP. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion from hypothalamic neurons: Stimulation by insulin and potentiation by leptin. Endocrinology. 2003;144(10):4484–4491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Hauguel-de Mouzon S, Lepercq J, Catalano P. The known and unknown of leptin in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(6):1537–1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Khant Aung Z, Grattan DR, Ladyman SR. Pregnancy-induced adaptation of central sensitivity to leptin and insulin. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2020;516:110933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Barrett ES, Parlett LE, Redmon JB, Swan SH. Evidence for sexually dimorphic associations between maternal characteristics and anogenital distance, a marker of reproductive development. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(1):57–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Salazar-Martinez E, Romano-Riquer P, Yanez-Marquez E, Longnecker MP, Hernandez-Avila M. Anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Environ Health. 2004;3(1):8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Auger J, Le Denmat D, Berges R, et al. Environmental levels of oestrogenic and antiandrogenic compounds feminize digit ratios in male rats and their unexposed male progeny. Proc Biol Sci. 2013;280(1768):20131532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Manning J, Kilduff L, Cook C, Crewther B, Fink B. Digit ratio (2D:4D): a biomarker for prenatal sex steroids and adult sex steroids in challenge situations. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2014;5:9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Zheng Z, Cohn MJ. Developmental basis of sexually dimorphic digit ratios. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(39):16289–16294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Stirrat LI, O’Reilly JR, Barr SM, et al. Decreased maternal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity in very severely obese pregnancy: associations with birthweight and gestation at delivery. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016;63:135–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Arbuckle TE, Agarwal A, MacPherson SH, et al. Prenatal exposure to phthalates and phenols and infant endocrine-sensitive outcomes: the MIREC study. Environ Int. 2018;120:572–583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Barrett ES, Hoeger KM, Sathyanarayana S, et al. Anogenital distance in newborn daughters of women with polycystic ovary syndrome indicates fetal testosterone exposure. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2018;9(3):307–314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Barrett ES, Parlett LE, Sathyanarayana S, et al. Prenatal exposure to stressful life events is associated with masculinized anogenital distance (AGD) in female infants. Physiol Behav. 2013;114-115:14–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Barrett ES, Sathyanarayana S, Mbowe O, et al. First-trimester urinary bisphenol A concentration in relation to anogenital distance, an androgen-sensitive measure of reproductive development, in infant girls. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125(7):077008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Kloboves ME, Pacyga DC, Gardiner JC, Flaws JA, Schantz SL, Strakovsky RS. Associations of maternal anthropometrics with newborn anogenital distance and the 2:4 digit ratio. Hum Reprod. 2022;37(9):2154–2166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Wang Z, Niu J, Ji H, et al. Association of pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with neonatal anogenital distance in a Chinese birth cohort. Reprod Health. 2022;19(1):152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Arendt LH, Ramlau-Hansen CH, Lindhard MS, et al. Maternal overweight and obesity and genital anomalies in male offspring: a population-based Swedish cohort study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2017;31(4):317–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Blomberg MI, Kallen B. Maternal obesity and morbid obesity: the risk for birth defects in the offspring. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88(1):35–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Waller DK, Shaw GM, Rasmussen SA, et al. Prepregnancy obesity as a risk factor for structural birth defects. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(8):745–750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Hutson JM. Cryptorchidism and hypospadias. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al. eds. Endotext. MDText.com Inc; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 46. Anand S, Lotfollahzadeh S. Hypospadias Urogenital Reconstruction. StatPearls; 2022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Nordenvall AS, Chen Q, Norrby C, et al. Fertility in adult men born with hypospadias: a nationwide register-based cohort study on birthrates, the use of assisted reproductive technologies and infertility. Andrology. 2020;8(2):372–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Chung E, Brock GB. Cryptorchidism and its impact on male fertility: a state of art review of current literature. Can Urol Assoc J. 2011;5(3):210–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Galarza RA, Rhon Calderón EA, Cortez AE, Faletti AG. Maternal overweight disrupts the sexual maturation of the offspring. Reprod Sci. 2017;24(9):1284–1292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Galarza RA, Rhon-Calderón EA, Bizzozero M, et al. Impact of maternal overweight on the sexual maturity of male offspring in rats. J Nutr Biochem. 2019;71:27–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Sharma M, Balasundaram P. Ovulation Induction Techniques. StatPearls; 2022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Herman-Giddens ME. The decline in the age of menarche in the United States: Should we be concerned? J Adolesc Health. 2007;40(3):201–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer . Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(11):1141–1151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. He C, Zhang C, Hunter DJ, et al. Age at menarche and risk of type 2 diabetes: results from 2 large prospective cohort studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171(3):334–344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Martin EJ, Brinton LA, Hoover R. Menarcheal age and miscarriage. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;117(5):634–636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Mendle J, Ryan RM, McKone KMP. Age at menarche, depression, and antisocial behavior in adulthood. Pediatrics. 2018;141(1):e20171703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Sandler DP, Wilcox AJ, Horney LF. Age at menarche and subsequent reproductive events. Am J Epidemiol. 1984;119(5):765–774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Palmert MR, Hirschhorn JN. Genetic approaches to stature, pubertal timing, and other complex traits. Mol Genet Metab. 2003;80(1-2):1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Towne B, Czerwinski SA, Demerath EW, Blangero J, Roche AF, Siervogel RM. Heritability of age at menarche in girls from the Fels Longitudinal Study. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005;128(1):210–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Li W, Liu Q, Deng X, Chen Y, Liu S, Story M. Association between obesity and puberty timing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(10):1266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Ramezani Tehrani F, Mirmiran P, Gholami R, Moslehi N, Azizi F. Factors influencing menarcheal age: results from the cohort of Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2014;12(3):e16130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Zhai L, Liu J, Zhao J, et al. Association of obesity with onset of puberty and sex hormones in Chinese girls: a 4-year longitudinal study. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0134656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Deardorff J, Berry-Millett R, Rehkopf D, Luecke E, Lahiff M, Abrams B. Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain, and age at menarche in daughters. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(8):1391–1398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Keim SA, Branum AM, Klebanoff MA, Zemel BS. Maternal body mass index and daughters' age at menarche. Epidemiology. 2009;20(5):677–681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Lawn RB, Lawlor DA, Fraser A. Associations between maternal prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain and daughter’s age at menarche: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(4):677–686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Ebling FJ. The neuroendocrine timing of puberty. Reproduction. 2005;129(6):675–683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Utriainen P, Laakso S, Liimatta J, Jääskeläinen J, Voutilainen R. Premature adrenarche—a common condition with variable presentation. Horm Res Paediatr. 2015;83(4):221–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Mantyselka A, Jaaskelainen J, Lindi V, et al. The presentation of adrenarche is sexually dimorphic and modified by body adiposity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(10):3889–3894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Miller WL, Auchus RJ. The “backdoor pathway” of androgen synthesis in human male sexual development. PLoS Biol. 2019;17(4):e3000198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Lunddorf LLH, Arendt LH, Ernst A, et al. Maternal polycystic ovarian syndrome and pubertal development in daughters and sons: a population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. Published online September 13, 2022. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Clark PM, Hindmarsh PC, Shiell AW, Law CM, Honour JW, Barker DJ. Size at birth and adrenocortical function in childhood. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1996;45(6):721–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Ornoy A. Prenatal origin of obesity and their complications: gestational diabetes, maternal overweight and the paradoxical effects of fetal growth restriction and macrosomia. Reprod Toxicol. 2011;32(2):205–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Dahlgren J, Boguszewski M, Rosberg S, Albertsson-Wikland K. Adrenal steroid hormones in short children born small for gestational age. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1998;49(3):353–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Matthews SG, McGowan PO. Developmental programming of the HPA axis and related behaviours: epigenetic mechanisms. J Endocrinol. 2019;242(1):T69–T79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Lu M, He X, Jiao Z, et al. The upregulation of glutamate decarboxylase 67 against hippocampal excitability damage in male fetal rats by prenatal caffeine exposure. Environ Toxicol. 2022;37(11):2703–2717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. McCormack KM, Howell BR, Higgins M, et al. The developmental consequences of early adverse care on infant macaques: a cross-fostering study. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022;146:105947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Freire C, Castiello F, Lopez-Espinosa MJ, et al. Association of prenatal phthalate exposure with pubertal development in Spanish boys and girls. Environ Res. 2022;213:113606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Leung TY, Leung TN, Sahota DS, et al. Trends in maternal obesity and associated risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes in a population of Chinese women. BJOG. 2008;115(12):1529–1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Negro S, Boutsikou T, Briana DD, et al. Maternal obesity and perinatal oxidative stress: the strength of the association. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2017;31(1):221–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Schrauwers C, Dekker G. Maternal and perinatal outcome in obese pregnant patients. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22(3):218–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris JP, et al. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25(8):1175–1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Myers DA, Singleton K, Kenkel C, Kaushal KM, Ducsay CA. Gestational hypoxia modulates expression of corticotropin-releasing hormone and arginine vasopressin in the paraventricular nucleus in the ovine fetus. Physiol Rep. 2016;4(1):e12643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. van Keulen BJ, Romijn M, van der Voorn B, et al. Sex-specific differences in HPA axis activity in VLBW preterm newborns. Endocr Connect. 2021;10(2):214–219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Ward AM, Syddall HE, Wood PJ, Chrousos GP, Phillips DI. Fetal programming of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis: low birth weight and central HPA regulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(3):1227–1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Emmanuel M, Bokor BR. Tanner Stages. StatPearls; 2022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Brix N, Ernst A, Lauridsen LLB, et al. Maternal pre-pregnancy obesity and timing of puberty in sons and daughters: a population-based cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48(5):1684–1694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Hounsgaard ML, Håkonsen LB, Vested A, et al. Maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and pubertal development among sons. Andrology. 2014;2(2):198–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Day FR, Thompson DJ, Helgason H, et al. Genomic analyses identify hundreds of variants associated with age at menarche and support a role for puberty timing in cancer risk. Nat Genet. 2017;49(6):834–841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Mensah FK, Bayer JK, Wake M, Carlin JB, Allen NB, Patton GC. Early puberty and childhood social and behavioral adjustment. J Adolesc Health. 2013;53(1):118–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Maisonet M, Christensen KY, Rubin C, et al. Role of prenatal characteristics and early growth on pubertal attainment of British girls. Pediatrics. 2010;126(3):e591–e600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Arendt LH, Høyer BB, Kreilgaard AF, et al. Maternal pre-pregnancy overweight and infertility in sons and daughters: a cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(5):843–849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Mariansdatter SE, Ernst A, Toft G, et al. Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and reproductive health of daughters in young adulthood. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(10):2150–2159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. McLaren JF. Infertility evaluation. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2012;39(4):453–463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Meseguer M, Santiso R, Garrido N, García-Herrero S, Remohí J, Fernandez JL. Effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on pregnancy outcome depends on oocyte quality. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):124–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Scheffer GJ, Broekmans FJ, Looman CW, et al. The number of antral follicles in normal women with proven fertility is the best reflection of reproductive age. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(4):700–706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group . Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(1):19–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Valgeirsdottir H, Vanky E, Sundström-Poromaa I, et al. Prenatal exposures and birth indices, and subsequent risk of polycystic ovary syndrome: a national registry-based cohort study. BJOG. 2019;126(2):244–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Lassance L, Haghiac M, Minium J, Catalano P, Hauguel-de Mouzon S. Obesity-induced down-regulation of the mitochondrial translocator protein (TSPO) impairs placental steroid production. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(1):E11–E18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Melo AS, Ferriani RA, Navarro PA. Treatment of infertility in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: approach to clinical practice. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015;70(11):765–769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Nieman CL, Kazer R, Brannigan RE, et al. Cancer survivors and infertility: a review of a new problem and novel answers. J Support Oncol. 2006;4(4):171–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Yang T, Wu X, Hu J, et al. Maternal high-fat diet promotes the development and progression of prostate cancer in transgenic adenocarcinoma mouse prostate offspring. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;47(5):1862–1870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Hilliard T, Petrasko P, Liu Y, et al. The role of generational obesity on the ovarian metastatic niche. Cancer Res. 2022;82(12 Suppl):2189. [Google Scholar]
- 103. Bates GE, Taub RN, West H. Fertility and cancer treatment. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(2):284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Donnez J, Godin PA, Qu J, Nisolle M. Gonadal cryopreservation in the young patient with gynaecological malignancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2000;12(1):1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Maltaris T, Seufert R, Fischl F, et al. The effect of cancer treatment on female fertility and strategies for preserving fertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;130(2):148–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Vakalopoulos I, Dimou P, Anagnostou I, Zeginiadou T. Impact of cancer and cancer treatment on male fertility. Hormones (Athens). 2015;14(4):579–589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Eriksson JG, Sandboge S, Salonen MK, Kajantie E, Osmond C. Long-term consequences of maternal overweight in pregnancy on offspring later health: Findings from the Helsinki Birth Cohort Study. Ann Med. 2014;46(6):434–438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Stacy SL, Buchanich JM, Ma ZQ, et al. Maternal obesity, birth size, and risk of childhood cancer development. Am J Epidemiol. 2019;188(8):1503–1511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Contreras ZA, Ritz B, Virk J, Cockburn M, Heck JE. Maternal pre-pregnancy and gestational diabetes, obesity, gestational weight gain, and risk of cancer in young children: a population-based study in California. Cancer Causes Control. 2016;27(10):1273–1285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Carter AM. Animal models of human pregnancy and placentation: alternatives to the mouse. Reproduction. 2020;160(6):R129–R143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Cunha GR, Sinclair A, Ricke WA, Robboy SJ, Cao M, Baskin LS. Reproductive tract biology: of mice and men. Differentiation. 2019;110:49–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Bortolin RC, Vargas AR, Gasparotto J, et al. A new animal diet based on human Western diet is a robust diet-induced obesity model: comparison to high-fat and cafeteria diets in term of metabolic and gut microbiota disruption. Int J Obes (Lond). 2018;42(3):525–534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Bauer SA, Arndt TP, Leslie KE, Pearl DL, Turner PV. Obesity in rhesus and cynomolgus macaques: a comparative review of the condition and its implications for research. Comp Med. 2011;61(6):514–526. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Krugner-Higby L, Luck M, Hartley D, Crispen HM, Lubach GR, Coe CL. High-risk pregnancy in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): a case of ectopic, abdominal pregnancy with birth of a live, term infant, and a case of gestational diabetes complicated by pre-eclampsia. J Med Primatol. 2009;38(4):252–256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Vaughan KL, Mattison JA. Obesity and aging in humans and nonhuman primates: a mini-review. Gerontology. 2016;62(6):611–617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no data sets were generated or analyzed during the present study.

