Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Nov 23;17(11):e0278036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278036

The GGDEF-EAL protein CdgB from Azospirillum baldaniorum Sp245, is a dual function enzyme with potential polar localization

Víctor I Viruega-Góngora 1, Iris S Acatitla-Jácome 1, David Zamorano-Sánchez 2, Sandra R Reyes-Carmona 1, María L Xiqui-Vázquez 1, Beatriz Eugenia Baca 1, Alberto Ramírez-Mata 1,*
Editor: Ching-Hong Yang3
PMCID: PMC9683572  PMID: 36417483

Abstract

Azospirillum baldaniorum Sp245, a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, can form biofilms through a process controlled by the second messenger cyclic diguanylate monophosphate (c-di-GMP). A. baldaniorum has a variety of proteins potentially involved in controlling the turnover of c-di-GMP many of which are coupled to sensory domains that could be involved in establishing a mutualistic relationship with the host. Here, we present in silico analysis and experimental characterization of the function of CdgB (AZOBR_p410089), a predicted MHYT-PAS-GGDEF-EAL multidomain protein from A. baldaniorum Sp245. When overproduced, CdgB behaves predominantly as a c-di-GMP phosphodiesterase (PDE) in A. baldaniorum Sp245. It inhibits biofilm formation and extracellular polymeric substances production and promotes swimming motility. However, a CdgB variant with a degenerate PDE domain behaves as diguanylate cyclase (DGC). This strongly suggest that CdgB is capable of dual activity. Variants with alterations in the DGC domain and the MHYT domain negatively affects extracellular polymeric substances production and induction of swimming motility. Surprisingly, we observed that overproduction of CdgB results in increased c-di-GMP accumulation in the heterologous host Escherichia coli, suggesting under certain conditions, the WT CdgB variant can behave predominantly as a DGC. Furthermore, we also demonstrated that CdgB is anchored to the cell membrane and localizes potentially to the cell poles. This localization is dependent on the presence of the MHYT domain. In summary, our results suggest that CdgB can provide versatility to signaling modules that control motile and sessile lifestyles in response to key environmental signals in A. baldaniorum.

Introduction

The second messenger cyclic diguanylate monophosphate (c-di-GMP) plays a central role in microbial cellular behaviors in response to the environment with ecological importance such as the production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), biofilm formation, chemotaxis, and several forms of motility, such as swimming, and swarming [14]. It is now well accepted that high intracellular levels of c-di-GMP inhibit motility and promote biofilm formation [57].

Intracellular c-di-GMP levels are controlled by the synthesizing activity of diguanylate cyclases (DGCs), which are GGDEF domain-containing proteins, and by the degrading activity of phosphodiesterases (PDEs) harboring EAL or HD-GYP domains [8]. Many of these proteins have distinct N-terminal sensing and signaling domains, suggesting that their activities in c-di-GMP turnover respond to various intra and extracellular signals. Examples of these sensing partner domains, are the Per-Arnt-Sim (PAS) [9], GAF [10], and MHYT [5] domains, among others, which could function as sensors or signal transmitters to the catalytic component of the molecule, regulating its enzymatic activity. Furthermore, approximately half of the many thousands of these enzymes annotated in protein databases are also integral membrane proteins, often with sensor domains located within the bacterial periplasm, and a DGC or PDE domain located in the cytoplasm [11]. Bioinformatic studies revealed that several Azospirillum genomes contain an average of 35 genes presumptively involved in c-di-GMP metabolism. A number of these proteins were predicted to have transmembrane domains, suggesting that they might be anchored to the cytoplasmic membrane [12].

Azospirillum baldaniorum Sp245 previously named A. brasilense Sp245 [13] is a plant growth-promoting bacterium (PGPB) used worldwide to promote sustainability in agriculture [14, 15]. This alpha proteobacterium inhabits the rhizosphere and soil, possess endophytic ability, and is known to promiscuously colonize the root surfaces of a wide variety of plants [14]. These bacteria can increase the yield of important crops growing in various soils and climatic regions [15]. The bacterium must cope with a very competitive environment in the rhizosphere and soils. It is capable of forming biofilms on wheat root surfaces [16], and use c-di-GMP signaling modules to promote this social behavior [17]. The genome of A. baldaniorum Sp245, has 35 genes that encode 25 proteins with a single GGDEF domain, 5 with an EAL domain, and 10 that carry both domains. So far, only two have been characterized: CdgC is a functional DGC involved in biofilm formation, EPS production, and plant colonization [18], and CdgD, a DGC-PDE hybrid protein, which is involved in motility, biofilm formation, and plant colonization through its c-di-GMP synthesizing activity [19].

The goal of this study was to further uncover c-di-GMP-signaling modules that could regulate sessile and motile lifestyles in A. baldaniorum Sp245. Here we report our findings regarding the characterization of the product of cdgB, a GGDEF-EAL hybrid protein. Our results revealed that CdgB has both DGC and PDE functions under different conditions and a MHYT domain that might be involved in the polar localization of CdgB. The identification and characterization of these types of c-di-GMP metabolic enzymes with dual activity, such as CdgB, are currently understudied but they will provide insights into c-di-GMP regulated processes related to environmental adaptations needed in the interaction of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria with their host plant.

Materials and methods

Protein sequence analysis, structure modeling and computational docking

The primary sequence of CdgB was analyzed with the databases SMART [20], Pfam [21], and Protter [22] to predict functional domains and features relevant to its cellular localization. Sequence alignments were performed using Clustal Omega [23] and STRAP [24]. The structural model for PAS-GGDEF-EAL of CdgB for schematic representation was built by I-TASSER and SwissModel servers [25, 26] taking as reference the structure of RbdA (Protein Data Bank [PDB]:5XGB). The structures of the GGDEF and EAL domains for molecular coupling analyses were built by the SwissModel server taking as reference the structures of RbdA (Protein Data Bank [PDB] code 5XGD) [27] for the GGDEF domain and MucR ([PDB] code 5M1T) [28] for the EAL domain, both from P. aeruginosa. The quality of the models was analyzed on the Molprobity server [29] and a subsequent structural minimization was carried out in UCSF Chimera 1.10 software [30]. The GTP and c-di-GMP substrates were taken from the PubChem database [31], to which hydrogens were added and structural minimization was performed for each in Avogadro 2.0 [32]. PDBQT files were generated in the AutodockTools tool, where Mg2+ ion uploads were added with the SwissModel server. Molecular coupling analyses were carried out on the AutoDockTool4 platform [33]. Finally, the visualization and preparation of figures were carried out in the UCSF Chimera 1.10 program.

Bacterial strains, plasmids, primers, media, and growth conditions

The strains, plasmids, and primers used in this work are described in Table 1. Escherichia coli strains were grown at 37°C in Lysogeny broth (LB), and agar (1.5% w/v) was added for solid medium. Antibiotics were added, when necessary, at the following concentrations: ampicillin (Ap), 100 μg/mL; chloramphenicol (Cm), 50 μg/mL; gentamicin (Gm), 15 μg/mL; kanamycin (Km), 20 μg/mL. A. baldaniorum Sp245 strains were grown in K-malate minimal medium, K-lactate minimal medium, Congo red (CR) medium, LB* (2.5 mM MgCl2 and 2.5 mM CaCl2) medium or NFB* medium [18]. For agar plates (agar 1.5% w/v) Gm 30 μg/mL or Km 50 μg/mL were added for plasmid or transconjugants selection.

Table 1. Strains, plasmids, and primers.

Strain or Plasmid Relevant Characteristics Source or Reference
Strains
Escherichia coli
DH5α fhA2 Δ(argF-lacZ) U169 phoA glnV44 Ф80 Δ(lacZ) M15 gyrA96 recA1 thi-1 hsdR17 Thermo Fisher Scientific
S17.1 recA, thi, pro, hsdR-M + RP4-2-Tc::Mu::Km:Tn7 [34]
Azospirillum baldaniorum
Sp245 Wild-type strain [35]
ΔcdgB cdgB gene deletion mutant derived from Sp245, Kmr This study
Plasmids
pGEM-TEasy Cloning vector f1 ori, ApR, lacZa, Promoter: T7, lac, Sp6 Promega
pGEM-A pGEM-TEasy containg a fragment of 992 bp from 5’ Flank of cdgB gene This study
pGEM-B pGEM-TEasy containg a fragment of 992 bp from 3’ Flank of cdgB gene This study
pGEM-cdgB pGEM-TEasy with the cdgB gene This study
pGEM-cdgB::egfp pGEM-TEasy with a transcriptional fusion cdgB::egfp This study
pGEM-cdgB-2 pGEM-TEasy with the BamH1 and EcoR1overhangs sites flanking cdgB gene This study
pJMS-Km Suicide vector derivative from pSUP202, Apr, Tcr, Kmr This study
pJMS-Km-FA Suicide vector derivative of pJMS-Km carrying the fragment 5’ -3’ of 992 bp This study
pMMS Suicide vector derivative from pJMS-Km-FA harboring ΔdgcB::Kmr This study
pMP2444 Host-range vector carrying the eGFP (Enhancer Green Fluorescent Protein) GmR [36]
pMP-cdgB Derivative from pMP2444 harboring the cdgB gene 45 pb before egfp gene This study
pMP-cdgBΔMHYT Derivative from pMP+cdgB harboring the Δ(806bp) MHYT-cdgB This study
pMP-cdgBSGDEF-SGKEF Derivative of pMP+cdgB where aspartic acid is replaced by lysine on the GGDEF motif (SGDEF to SGKEF) of CdgB This study
pMP+cdgBEAL-AAL Derivative of pMP+cdgB where glutamic acid is replaced by alanine on the EAL motif (EAL to AAL) of CdgB This study
pMP-cdgB::egfp Derivative from pMP2444 with a translational fusion cdgB::egfp This study
pGEX-4T-1 Expression vector, tac promoter, GST tag, Apr Promega
pGEX-cdgB Plasmid derived from pGEX-4T-1 containing the ORF of cdgB gene, Apr This study
pGEX-cdgBSGDEF-SGKEF Derivative of pGEX-cdgB where aspartic acid is replaced by lysine on the GGDEF motif (SGDEF to SGKEF) of CdgB This study
pGEX-cdgBEAL-AAL Derivative of pGEX-cdgB where glutamic acid is replaced by alanine on the EAL motif (EAL to AAL) of CdgB This study
pDZ-119 c-di-GMP biosensor, Cmr [37]
Primer Sequence 5´-3´ Reference
Fkpnaz88 GATAGGTACCAATGAACCGGAACGACCTCAG This study
Rxhoaz88 TAAGCTCGAGGCCGCTTGATCCGATTACCTT This study
Fspeaz90 GATAACTAGTCACGGACGTTTTTCGCGG This study
Rsacaz90 TAAGGAGCTCAAGCACGACCTGTTCGTCT This study
Forf89 GATACCCGGGATGCGTGTGTATGCCTGC This study
Rorf89 TAAGAAGCTTTCACGCCGGCTCGTAGAAG This study
cdgB-F-24 TCGGATCC ATCGGATCAAGCGGCGTCGA This study
cdgB-R-24 GCCCTTGCTCACCATCGCCGGCTCGTAGAAGCGTG This study
gfp-F-24 TTCTACGAGCCGGCGATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGGA This study
gfp-R-24 AGTCTAGA TTACTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGCCG This study
cdgB-F-int GGTACCGACCGGCTGCTGCAGGAGAT This study
gfp-ext TACGTATTACTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGCCG This study
BcdgB-F CAGGATCCGCCATCGTCGACCAGCGGCT This study
EcdgB-R ACGAATTCTCACGCCGGCTCGTAGAAGC This study
GGDEF-F GGGCTGAGCGGCAAAGAGTTCGCCGTG This study
GGDEF-R GACGGCGAACTCTTTGCCGCTCAGCCG This study
EAL-F ATCCTGGGCTTCGCGGCGCTGGTGCGC This study
EAL-R GCGCACCAGCGCCGCGAAGCCCAGGAT This study

Ampicillin = Apr; Gentamycin = Gmr; Chloramphenicol = Cmr; Kanamycin = Kmr; Tetracycline = Tcr.

Construction of plasmids and variant strains

Isolation of genomic and plasmid DNA used for DNA restriction enzyme digestion, electrophoretic agarose analysis, and transformation assays was carried out according to standard protocols [38].

The ΔcdgB mutant strain was constructed by replacing the coding region of cdgB with a kanamycin resistance cassette as previously described [17]. The DNA fragments flanking cdgB (GenBank accession number WP_014199675) were amplified by PCR using the primers Fkpnaz88 and Rxhoaz88 to generate the upstream A fragment of 992 bp, and the primers Fspeaz90 and Rsacaz90 to generate the downstream B fragment of 993 bp, each of which were subsequently cloned in the pGEM-T Easy vector, through TA cloning (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), respectively and transformed in E. coli DH5α to obtain the corresponding pGEM-A and pGEM-B constructs. The A fragment was excised with KpnI and XhoI, then was ligated into pJMS-Km suicide vector previously digested with the same restriction enzymes to yield the plasmid pJMS-Km-FA which was subsequently transformed into E. coli DH5α. Both pGEM-B and pJMS-Km-FA were digested with SpeI and SacI restriction enzymes and ligated to generate the pMMS construct, which contains the ΔcdgB::kmr fragment. The pMMS construct was mobilized into A. baldaniorum Sp245 by biparental mating using E. coli S17.1 as a donor strain. Transconjugants were screened on K-lactate minimal medium with kanamycin 50 μg/mL. The mutation of interest in single colonies that were resistant to Km was further confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing analysis.

The cdgB overexpression constructs, were generated using the pMP2444 broad host-range plasmid [36]. The full-length ORF of cdgB gene, was amplified using the Forf89 and Rorf89 primers and subsequently cloned into pGEM-TEasy to obtain the construct pGEM-cdgB. The pGEM-cdgB and pMP2444 plasmids were digested with the EcoR1 restriction enzyme. The EcoRI digested fragments corresponding to cdgB and linearized pMP2444 were ligated to generate pMP-cdgB. The desired 5’–3’ orientation of the insert (cdgB expressed under the lac promoter) was confirmed by restriction analysis with HindIII. Competent E. coli S17.1 cells were transformed with the pMP-cdgB plasmid. Transformed cells were used as donors in biparental matings to transfer pMP-cdgB to A. baldaniorum Sp245. The point mutation on the GGDEF motif (D456K) was introduced by inverted PCR using the Q5 Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (New England BioLabs) following the manufacturer’s instructions (using the primer pair GGDEF-F and GGDEF-R). The resulting pMP-cdgBSGDEF-SGKEF plasmid was introduced into E. coli S17.1 and subsequently transferred to A. baldaniorum Sp245 by biparental conjugation. The same strategy was used for introducing the point mutation in the EAL motif (E580A) (using the primer pair EAL-F and EAL-R). The resulting pMP-cdgBEAL-AAL plasmid was introduced into E. coli S17.1 and subsequently transferred to A. baldaniorum Sp245 through conjugation.

All plasmid constructs were sequenced to confirm the correct sequence of cdgB and its desired orientation (downstream and under the control of the lac promoter). These constructs do not have the gene that produces the LacI repressor, hence the Plac promoter is constitutively active.

To generate a cdgB::egfp translational fusion we used a PCR fusion approach designed by Yang et al. [39]. Briefly, the cdgB gene, without a stop codon, was amplified with primers cdgB-F-24 and cdgB-R-24, and the egfp reporter gene was amplified using gfp-F-24 and gfp-R-24. The primer cdgB-R-24 and gfp-F-24 have compatible overhangs that allow fusing the amplicons through PCR amplification using the primer pair cdgB-F-24- gfp-R-24. The fused PCR product and plasmid pMP2444 were digesting with BamH1 and XbaI restriction enzymes, and ligated to generate the plasmid pMP-cdgB::egfp. E. coli S17.1 competent cells were transformed with pMP-cdgB::egfp and a transformant was used to transfer the plasmid to A. baldaniorum Sp245 by conjugation to as previously described [16].

The MHYT domain was deleted by digesting the pMP-cdgB::egfp construct with SalI. The digested fragment of 7113 bp that lack the MHYT domain was ligated to produce the pMP-cdgBΔMHYT plasmid, which was introduced to E. coli S17.1 by chemical transformation. The plasmid was transferred by conjugation to A. baldaniorum Sp245. The cdgBΔMHYT deletion allele was sequenced to verify that the open reading frame was not shifted.

To generate the pGEX-cdgB construct, cdgB was amplified by PCR using primers BcdgB-F and EcdgB-R and inserted in the pGEM-TEasy plasmid, obtaining the pGEM-cdgB-2 construct. The pGEM-cdgB-2 and pGEX-4T1 plasmids were digested with the BamH1 and EcoR1 enzymes, the digested fragment containing cdgB was ligated to the linearized pGEX-4T1 plasmid to generate pGEX-cdgB. To obtain the variants with point mutations on GGDEF and EAL motifs (pGEX-cdgBSGDEF-SGKEF and pGEX-cdgBEAL-AAL) we used the same strategy above described. We used the same primer set (GGDEF-F, GGDEF-R and EAL-F, EAL-R). The sequences of the three inserts were analyzed through Sanger sequencing. All constructs (pGEX-cdgB, pGEX-cdgBSGDEF-SGKEF and pGEX-cdgBEAL-AAL) were used to transform competent E. coli S17.1 cells harboring the c-di-GMP biosensor pDZ-119 [37].

Analysis of growth curves

To determine possible effects of plasmid pMP-cdgB or ΔcdgB deletion mutant on growth rates, growth curves were performed and compared with strains carrying the empty vector pMP2444 or WT strain. Overnight cultures were diluted to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.01 in 100 ml Erlenmeyer flasks (3 replicates per strain) containing 25 ml of NFB* medium supplemented with Gm, when it was necessary for plasmid selection. Cultures were incubated in a rotary shaker (150 r.p.m.) at 30° C and OD600 measured every 2 hours, using an EON microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) at 595 nm.

Biofilm formation assay

The biofilm formation assay was performed as previously described [17, 40, 41]. Briefly, A. baldaniorum Sp245 and the A. baldaniorum derived strains (A. baldaniorum ΔcdgB, A. baldaniorum ΔcdgB+pMP-cdgB, A. baldaniorum+cdgB, A. baldaniorum+cdgBΔMHYT, A. baldaniorum+cdgBSGDEF-SGKEF, A. baldaniorum+cdgBEAL-AAL, A. baldaniorum+cdgB::egfp) were grown overnight at 30°C in LB* medium. Next, 7.5 mL of NFB* medium supplemented with KNO3, in borosilicate round-bottom tubes were inoculated with 75 μL of overnight cultures grown in LB* diluted to an OD600 of 2.0. After inoculation, the cultures were incubated for 5 days at 30°C under static conditions. Biofilms were stained with a 0.5% (w/vol) crystal violet solution for 30 min, and then rinsed with distilled water. Bound crystal violet was solubilized with 2 mL of acetic acid 33% (v/v), and crystal violet concentration was determined using 96-wells microassay plates read in an EON microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) at 595 nm. Crystal violet measurements were normalized by total protein concentration measured with the Bradford method. The results are from three independent experiments with three biological determinations.

Determination of extracellular polymeric substance production

To analyze EPS production, A. baldaniorum and derivative strains were grown in LB* and diluted to obtain bacterial suspensions with an OD600 of 1.2–1.4 in NFB* medium supplemented with KNO3 and grown for five days at 30°C, under static conditions. Next, cultures were centrifuged at 10,000 g, the pellets were suspended in 1 ml NFB* media, as described above, and a 0.005% (w/v) Congo Red (CR) colorant solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Chemical) was added to achieve a 40 μg/ml concentration. The cells were incubated with agitation (200 rpm) for two hours. Afterward, CR bound to cells was quantified as previously described [17, 19]. CR measurements were normalized by total protein concentration measured with the Bradford method. The results are of three independent assays with three biological determinations.

Motility assay

The swim motility assay was performed as previously described [19, 42]. Briefly, bacteria were grown in LB* medium at 30°C until reaching 5x106-5x107 CFU/mL, afterwards 5 μL of the culture were spotted over semisolid minimal K medium supplemented with malate, succinate, or proline (10 mM) as a carbon source and containing 0.25% (w/v) agar. The size of the bacterial motility ring was measured in cm after incubation at 30°C for 48 h.

Relative quantification of c-di-GMP accumulation using a genetic biosensor

C-di-GMP levels were analyzed using the riboswitch-based dual fluorescence reporter system as described previously [18, 19, 43]. This biosensor expresses AmCyan and TurboRFP, both fluorescent proteins (green and red, respectively), from the same constitutive promoter. TurboRFP production is inhibited at low levels of c-di-GMP due to the presence of c-di-GMP-binding riboswitch. For this purpose, the constructs pGEX-CdgB, pGEX-cdgBSGDEF-SGKEF, pGEX-cdgBEAL-AAL, pGEX-CdgA (positive control) [17] and the empty vector pGEX-4T-1 (negative control) were used to transformed a competent E. coli S17.1 strain containing the pDZ-119 vector [37]. All bacterial strains were grown in LB medium at 30° to an OD600 of approximately 0.6. Afterwards, 0.1 mM IPTG was added to the bacterial culture, and these were further incubated for 24 h for induction of protein expression. Cultures were concentrated 10-fold and resuspended in water. c-di-GMP production was analyzed macroscopically relating color intensity with the production of the second messenger. Microscopic assessment of c-di-GMP was performed using a Nikon Eclipse TE2000U fluorescence microscope. A drop of the induced culture was deposited on a coverslip and covered with a 1% agarose pad. The excitation and emission of the calibrator AmCyan fluorophore were recorded at 457 and 520 nm, respectively. The reporter TurboRFP fluorophore was excited at 553 nm, while its emission was measured at 574 nm. Images obtained were edited with the Nikon NIS Elements. Merge images represented the overlay of the fluorescence images AmCyan green, TurboRFP red and both yellow. The relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) was calculated as the ratio between the TurboRFP and AmCyan fluorescence intensities and is directly proportional to c-di-GMP levels, as analyzed using ImageJ software. The RFI values represent the standard deviations of three biological replicates, and significant differences are indicated at * P < 0.05 according to Student´s t-test by SigmaPlot as previously described [19, 44].

Microscopy studies

To visualize bacteria by fluorescence and confocal laser scanner microscopy (CLSM), A. baldaniorum Sp245 and its derivative strains were grown in 5 mL of NFB* medium at 30°C, with agitation (150 rpm) for 18 h. Then, 1 mL of each culture was centrifuged at 8,000 rpm for 2 min, and each pellet was suspended in 100 μL of FM4-64FX dye (10 μg/mL) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and maintained for 10 min at 4°C to stain the lipids of the membrane. FM4-64FX fluorescence was observed with a microscope (TE 2000U; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) with a 100x objective lens (Plan Oil immersion) and photographed with a DS-QilMc camera (Nikon). Subsequently, 10μL of each suspension was mounted onto a glass coverslip and sealed with a 1% (w/v) agarose plug. When necessary, we also used DAPI to stain nucleoids. For video recordings, the samples were viewed with an Eclipse Ti-E C2+ confocal laser scanning microscope (Nikon) with a 60X objective lens (Plan Apo VC, water immersion). eGFP was excited at 488 nm, and its fluorescent emission was captured at 510 nm, FM4-64FX was excited at 565 nm and its fluorescent emission was captured at 734 nm, while DAPI was excited at 358 nm and its fluorescent emission was captured at 461 nm. Image slices were visualized and processed using the NIS Elements software (Nikon). The images were edited with ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) as previously described [16]. To visualize biofilms formed by the strains under study, the bacteria were grown in NFB*+KNO3 medium supplemented with 85 μM of Calcofluor-White colorant (CWC) (Sigma-Aldrich, United States) and inoculated onto FluoroDish glass-bottom dishes (Fisher Scientific), at 30°C in static conditions as previously described [41].

Biofilms forming on the surfaces of dishes were recorded after 5 days and observed by CLMS. CWC was excited at 440 nm with a UV laser and its emission was captured at 500–520 nm. The samples were scanned at an x/y scanning resolution of 1,024 × 1,024 pixels. The step size in the z-direction was 0.1 μm. The image stacks were visualized and processed using NIS Elements and edited using ImageJ as previously described [41]. This analysis allowed generating a three-dimensional view of the biofilm through the measurement of signal intensity. The biofilm structure can be observed as an intensity surface plot, where the intensity of the signal represents the density of EPS produced.

Western blotting analysis

For analysis of the expression of GFP-fusion proteins in A. baldaniorum Sp245, derivative strains were cultured in NFB*+KNO3 medium at 30°C to an OD600 of 1.0. Bacteria cells were collected by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. The cells were resuspended in PBS, supplemented with Roche Complete Mini EDTA-free protease inhibitor, and ultrasonicated for 2 min. Cellular debris was sedimented by centrifugation (30 min. at 10,000 X g). The supernatant (soluble fraction) was obtained, and the pellet (insoluble fraction) was resuspended in PBS supplemented with detergent mix (0.5% Triton X 100; 0.1% SDS, and 0.5% 7-Deoxycholic acid sodium salt), and centrifuged at 25,000 X g for 2 h, to obtain protein membrane total extract. The total protein concentration of the respective fractions was determined using the Bradford method. The samples were resuspended in 5X loading buffer, boiled, separated on 10% SDS-PAGE, and subsequently transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) for immunoblotting using anti-GFP antibody (GFP D5.1 Rabbit mAb, HRP Conjugate, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, Massachusetts, USA.) HRP-DAB substrate Kit (Thermo Scientific Pierce) was used to check the target proteins on the membrane according to the manufacturer’s guidelines.

Statistical analysis

Means were compared by Student’s t-test to determine statistically significant differences. Differences were considered significant at P-values less than 0.05.

Results

The domain architecture of CdgB contains multiple sensory domains and conserved GGDEF and EAL domains

CdgB (AZOBR_p410089) from A. baldaniorum Sp245 [45] is 794 amino acid residues long and is predicted to have seven transmembrane regions, a PAS domain, a GGDEF and an EAL domain (Fig 1A and 1B). The transmembrane regions conform a conserved MHYT domain which proposed to be involved in gas sensing [46, 47] (Fig 1C). Three MHYT motifs, characterized by conserved methionine, histidine, tyrosine, and threonine residues, are located in positions 64–67, 125–128, and 187–190 (Figs 1B and S1). Each MHYT motif spans two transmembrane helices, and is projected to the outer face of the cytoplasmic membrane [46]. The PAS domain faces the cytoplasm and is comprised by 107 amino acid residues from position 256 to 362. The C-terminus of CdgB resides in the cytosol and includes both the GGDEF (363–534 aa) and EAL (544–786 aa) domains (Fig 1B).

Fig 1. Structural architecture and homology modeling of CdgB protein of A. baldaniorum Sp245.

Fig 1

(A) Schematic representation of the conserved domains of CdgB determined by the SMART database (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de). (B) Transmembranal regions of CdgB analyzed with the Protter server. (C) Schematic representation of the 3D structure of the CdgB, PAS-GGDEF-EAL domains. The MHYT transmembrane domain was not integrated into the homology model, however, it is represented schematically into the cytoplasmic membrane cartoon. The PAS domain is in beige, the GGDEF domain is in blue, and the EAL domain is shown in green.

The primary sequence of the GGDEF domain of CdgB was aligned to the GGDEF domain of two characterized DGCs, PleD and RbdA [27, 48]. CdgB has an SGDEF motif in place of the canonical GGD[E]EF motif. This motif has been found in active DGCs in both bacteria and eukaryotes [4951]. PleD and RbdA have an allosteric autoinhibitory site with a RXXD motif, CdgB has a PXXD motif instead, hence it is most likely not autoinhibited by its catalytic product (Fig 2A and 2B).

Fig 2. CdgB GGDEF domain structure.

Fig 2

(A) Sequence alignment between CdgB GGDEF domain from A. baldaniorum Sp245 (GenBank access number CCD03171.1) and other GGDEF domains of known structure. PleD, C. crescentus (GenBank access number YP_002517919.1), and RbdA, P. aeruginosa (GenBank access number AAG04250.1). Secondary structure elements are displayed above 719 the sequences. The residues highlighted in blue are involved in the interaction with the substrate; in green, those that interact with the cofactor; the active site of the GGDEF motif is highlighted in red square, and the RXXD motif is in black square. (B) Structural model of the CdgB GGDEF monomer generated by homology modeling. The GGDEF motif is highlighted in red and the RXXD pattern is highlighted in orange. (C) Structural model of CdgB GGDEF monomer in complex with GTP. The GGDEF domain is shown in surface mode. (D) Model of the GGDEF/GTP interaction generated by molecular coupling with a ΔG = - 8.2 Kcal/mol and overlapped with the 5XGD crystal structure, corresponding to GGDEF domain from P. aeruginosa showed in light purple color with an RMSD of 0.539 of ligands. The Mg2+ ion is shown in green.

The amino acid sequence of the EAL domain of CdgB was aligned to the sequence of the EAL domain of two well characterized PDEs, RocR and MucR [28, 52]. The alignment revealed that the EAL domain of CdgB conserve the residues involved in binding to c-di-GMP (Y565, Q566, P567, R584, D698, D720), Mg2+(E580, N365, E667, D697, K718, E757, Q774), and for the formation and stability of loop 6 (E670). This loop is an essential structure for dimerization [53] (Fig 3A and 3B).

Fig 3. CdgB EAL domain structure.

Fig 3

(A) Sequence alignment between CdgB EAL domain from A. baldaniorum Sp245 (GenBank access number CCD03171.1) and other EAL domains of known structure. RocR, (GenBank access number NP_252636.1), and MucR (GenBank access number AAG05116.1) from P. aeruginosa. Secondary structure elements are displayed above the sequences. The residues highlighted in blue are involved in the interaction with the substrate. Those that interact with cofactor are marked in green. The residue that stabilizes structurally the loop 6 is shown in yellow. The catalytic residue is in red. The EAL motif is marked with a red box, and loop 6 is inside a box with black outline. (B) Structural model of the CdgB EAL monomer generated by homology modeling. The EAL motif is highlighted in red and loop 6 is highlighted in orange. (C) Structural model of the CdgB EAL monomer in complex with c-di-GMP. The EAL domain is presented in surface mode. (D) Model of the EAL domain in complex with c-di-GMP generated by molecular coupling with a ΔG = -8.58 Kcal/mol and overlapped with the 5M1T crystal structure, corresponding 744 to EAL domain from P. aeruginosa showed in light purple color with an RMSD of 0.757 of ligands. The Mg2+ ions are shown in green.

To extend our in silico analysis of CdgB, we conducted tertiary structure predictions using available crystal structures of validated GGDEF and EAL domains from the Protein Data Bank repository. The GGDEF domain from CdgB was modeled using as template the crystallographic coordinates of the GGDEF domain from RbdA (PDB input: 5XGD; identity 31.84%) from P. aeruginosa [27]. The EAL domain from CdgB was modeled using as template the coordinates of the three-dimensional structure of the EAL domain of MucR (PDB input: 5M1T; identity 45.82%) from P. aeruginosa [28] (Figs 2 and 3).

The three-dimensional model of the GGDEF domain of CdgB was used to analyze the potential interaction with its substrates using molecular coupling analyses (molecular docking) (Fig 2C). Our analysis predicted an interaction of GTP with the GGDEF domain of CdgB with ΔG = -8.2 Kcal/mol (Fig 2D). The interaction interphase includes residues N420, D429, D455. These amino acids, conserved in GGDEF domains, have been shown to be essential for the activity of DGCs [27]. The first 2 residues are important for the binding of GTP, while D455 (located at the active site) coordinates the Mg+2 ion to perform the nucleophilic attack on the alpha phosphate of GTP eliminating a pyrophosphate, resulting in the formation of c-di-GMP from another GTP molecule [48, 54]. Molecular docking analysis also predicted that the EAL domain of CdgB can bind c-di-GMP with a ΔG = -8.58 Kcal/mol (Fig 3C and 3D). The N635 residue is responsible for coordinating Mg2+ ions and is essential for the EAL domain, as its mutation was reported to significantly affect PDE activity [28, 53]. The amino acid residues R584 and Q566 could be involved in substrate binding by interacting with the anionic phosphate oxygen and guanine moieties of c-di-GMP [52, 54, 55]. These analyses suggest that CdgB could potentially act as a dual DGC/PDE protein.

We found cdgB orthologues in different species within the Azospirillum genus, as well as in other alpha-proteobacteria (S2 Fig). This could suggest that this domain architecture and potential bifunctional activity may give these bacteria a selective advantage or the ability to adapt to changes in environmental signals.

Analyses of phenotypical consequences of alterations in cdgB in A. baldaniorum Sp245

The role of GGDEF-EAL proteins with dual activity has been poorly explored, hence we decided to investigate whether cdgB influences the biofilm formation, EPS production, and swimming motility of A. baldaniorum Sp245. To do so we generated an A. baldaniorum Sp245 strain with a deletion cdgB (A. baldaniorum ΔcdgB) and use different overexpression constructs to analyze the effect of overproducing the WT allele (pMP-cdgB) and mutated alleles with different point mutations that result on altered GGDEF or EAL motifs (pMP-cdgBSGDEF-SGKEF and pMP-cdgB EAL-AAL respectively), or a deletion of the MHYT domain (pMP-cdgBΔMHYT), we also included the A. baldaniorum pMP-cdgB::egfp to analyze the stability of the CdgB::eGFP fusion. As negative controls, we analyzed strains containing the broad host-range plasmid pMP2444 (Table 1).

We first evaluated the growth rate of the strains of interest in NFB* media supplemented with KNO3 as a nitrogen source [18, 19]. Our results showed that all the strains exhibited similar growth characteristics (S3 Fig). Next, we analyzed the results from biofilm formation assays. The ΔcdgB mutant strain, made 25% less biofilm compared to the parental strain (Fig 4). This could suggest that in the WT background CdgB is required for biofilm formation. Since c-di-GMP is required for biofilm formation this result would suggest that a baseline levels of expression CdgB may act as a DGC. The presence of the complementation construct pMP-cdgB in the ΔcdgB mutant strain partially restored biofilm formation compared to the WT strain with the overexpression plasmid pMP2444 (Fig 4). Interestingly, the overproduction of CdgB, CdgB-ΔMHYT and CdgB-SGDEF-SGKEF in the WT background of A. baldaniorum Sp245, resulted in decreased biofilm formation compared to both the parental WT strain and the ΔcdgB mutant strain. This suggests that, in the presence of an intact endogenous copy of cdgB, overproduction of CdgB from a plasmid has a negative effect on biofilm formation. This would indicate that at levels beyond a yet not defined threshold, CdgB may act as a PDE. To further evaluate the potential PDE activity of CdgB, we overproduced a CdgB variant with point mutations in the EAL domain that alter amino acids required for its catalytic activity (CdgB-EAL-AAL). The overproduction of CdgB-EAL-AAL in the WT strain, instead of negatively impacting biofilm formation as observed when overproducing WT CdgB, it promoted biofilm formation at levels higher than the control strain (Fig 4). This result suggests that, when overproduced, CdgB can act as a DGC when the amino acids required for PDE activity are altered. Together these results led us to propose that CdgB is a dual-function enzyme capable of synthesizing and degrading c-di-GMP.

Fig 4. CdgB alters biofilm formation in A. baldaniorum Sp245.

Fig 4

Graph representing the mean and standard deviation of biofilm quantification from 5 days of growth in statical conditions at 30°C. Data represent results of three independent experiments with three biological replicates. Significant differences relative to WT (P < 0.05) are indicated by “*”and to +cdgB (P < 0.005) by “**” according to Student´s t-test.

To further support our conclusions, we next estimated the ability of these strains to produce extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) that are likely required for biofilm formation. The strains were grown in NFB*+ KNO3 and tested for their capacity to bind the colorant Congo Red (Fig 5), a dye that binds extracellular DNA, several exopolysaccharides, amyloid proteins and has been used as an indirect measurement of c-di-GMP production [56, 57]. In general, we observed that the biofilm phenotype of the different strains positively correlates with EPS production (Figs 4 and 5), except for the strains that overproduce CdgB-ΔMHYT and CdgB-SGDEF-SGKEF. We did not observe significant differences in EPS production in strains overproducing these CdgB variants compared to the control strain (no CdgB overproduction). These variants may have reduced PDE activity although more evidence is required to make that conclusion.

Fig 5. CdgB alters EPS accumulation in A. baldaniorum Sp245.

Fig 5

Graph representing the mean and standard deviation of EPS quantification after 5 days of growth in statical conditions at 30°C. Data represent results of three independent experiments with three biological replicates. Significant differences relative to WT (P < 0.05) are indicated by “*”and to +cdgB (P < 0.005) by “**” according to Student´s t-test.

We further analyzed exopolysaccharide production on mature biofilms formed under static conditions in NFB* media supplemented with KNO3 by staining with the dye calcofluor white (CWC) (Fig 6). This dye shows affinity to polysaccharides with β-1,3 and β-1,4 linkages, such as those present in capsular polysaccharides and exopolysaccharides produced by Azospirillum [58]. The ΔcdgB mutant strain and the CdgB-overexpressing-strain showed a low CWC binding, compared to WT and control strains in mature biofilms. In contrast, the strain overproducing CdgBEAL-AAL produced more exopolysaccharides compared to the controls. The strain overproducing CdgBSGDEF-SGKEF behaved as the WT strain and the negative control, while the strain overproducing CdgBΔMHYT behaved comparable to the strain overproducing CdgB (Fig 6). These results further support our observations on the role of CdgB in controlling biofilm formation and EPS production, as well as for the proposed importance of EPS production on biofilm maturation in A. baldaniorum Sp245 [59].

Fig 6. Biofilm formation analysis with confocal laser scanner microscopy.

Fig 6

Images represent Three-dimensional reconstruction of 5-day old static biofilms; the blue fluorescence signal represents exopolysaccharides staining. Gray images are Intensity surface plots corresponding to the emitted fluorescence by CWC. The biofilm formed was directly observed using Nikon confocal microcopy C2+ with a 20X objective (CFI Plan ApVC 20X numerical aperture of 1.2). Exciting laser intensity, background level contrast, and electronic zoom were maintained at the same level.

Since motility is regulated by c-di-GMP in a opposite manner compared to biofilm formation and EPS production, we next evaluated the effect of overexpressing CdgB and the mutated variants on swimming motility in the presence of a variety of chemosensory signals (malate, succinate and proline). The overproduction of CdgB promoted swimming motility in the presence of any of the tested chemoattractants, while overproduction of the CdgB variant with the AAL motif had the opposite effect. Strains overproducing the CdgB variants with either the SGKEF motif or the deletion of the MHYT domain, as well as the ΔcdgB mutant strain, showed none or modest effects on motility (Fig 7). These results further suggest that CdgB can affect phenotypes associated with the levels of c-di-GMP, and hence that it is most likely a dual-function DGC-PDE. The switch in catalytic activity could depend on its abundance in A. baldaniorum cells or the presence of signals that inhibit its PDE activity.

Fig 7. CdgB alters swimming motility in A. baldaniorum Sp245.

Fig 7

Graph representing the mean of motility halos, in centimeters (cm), of the indicated strains on K-media plates with agar 0.25%, supplemented with (A) malate, (B) succinate, or (C) proline (10mM) at 30°C for 48 h. Error bars indicate standard deviations of 6 replicates per strain. (D) Representative images of motility halos from three independent experiments with two biological determinations. Significant differences relative to WT (P < 0.005) according to Student´s t-test are indicated by “*”.

CdgB has DGC activity in Escherichia coli

To analyze the effect of CdgB on c-di-GMP accumulation we examined the cellular levels of c-di-GMP with the use of a c-di-GMP biosensor in the heterologous host E. coli S17.1 [18]. When the concentration of the second messenger increases, TurboRFP increases proportionally [37, 43]. To this end we analyzed CdgB native and CdgB variants with point mutations in the DGC domain (CdgBSGDEF-SGKEF) and the EAL domain (CdgBEAL-AAL), respectively. The expression of CdgB (pGEX-CdgB/ pDZ-119 strain) resulted in accumulation of red fluorescent individual cells and the formation of red fluorescent colonies (Fig 8). These traits were also observed when the previously characterized DGC CdgA was overproduced, but not when the empty plasmid pGEX-4T1 was used instead (Fig 8) [17]. The bacterial cells containing pGEX-CdgBSGDEF-SGKEF expression vector showed the same color as that of the negative pGEX-4T1 control. Whereas the pGEX-CdgBEAL-AAL strain increased the accumulation of red fluorescent bacterial cells and colonies (Fig 8). These results strongly suggest that CdgB has both DGC and PDE activities in E. coli.

Fig 8. CdgB promotes c-di-GMP accumulation in a heterologous host.

Fig 8

Representative images of macroscopic and microscopic observations of c-di-GMP levels judged by green and red coloring of colony spots and liquid concentrates as well as green and red fluorescence of individual cells from strains harboring the genetic biosensor in pDZ-119 and (A) pGEX-CdgA (DGC positive control), (B) pGEX-4T1 (negative control), (C) pGEX-CdgB, (D) pGEX-CdgBSGDEF-SGKEF, or (E) pGEX-CdgBEAL-AAL. (F) The relative fluorescence intensity represents the ratio between the TurboRFP and AmCyan fluorescence intensities and is directly proportional to c-di-GMP levels, as analyzed using ImageJ software. The RFI values represent the standard deviations of three biological replicates, and significant differences are indicated at *(P < 0.05) according to Student´s t-test by SigmaPlot. The white bar corresponds to 10 μm.

CdgB is potentialy polarly localized

Studies have shown that some proteins involved in c-di-GMP metabolism need an specific localization to regulate cell behavior [6062]. Bioinformatic analyses predicted that CdgB contains an MHYT domain with seven transmembrane helices (Fig 1). These observations prompted us to evaluate if CdgB is anchored to the cell membrane through its MHYT domain. To do so, we analyzed the localization of a CdgB-eGFP fusion protein through fluorescence microscopy. To better delineate the cellular membrane, we stained the cells with a membrane lipid-specific dye (FM4-64FX). We observed CdgB anchored to the cell membrane and eventually arrive to cell poles (Fig 9) (S1 Video). The membrane anchor of CdgB depended on the presence of the MHYT domain (Fig 9).

Fig 9. CdgB is anchored to the cytoplasmic membrane and polarly localized.

Fig 9

The first two columns (left to right) show representative images acquired to detect fluorescence of the FM4-64FX fluorophore (red) that bind to lipidic membranes, and fluorescence from the eGFP protein (green). The third column shows images where the two fluorescent signals were merged. The white arrowheads indicate polar localization of CdgB protein. The white bar corresponds to 10 μm.

We also confirmed through immunoblot analysis that the strain of A. baldaniorum expressing CdgBΔMHYT produced a truncated CdgB-eGFP protein of 85 kDa in the cytoplasmic fraction, while the A. baldaniorum strain expressing CdgB-eGFP produced a protein of 112 kDa, mainly detected in protein extracts obtained by detergent solubilization (S4 Fig). Our results unveiled that CdgB is possibly polarly localized. We found, in both strains tested (A. baldaniorum+cdgB::egfp and A. baldaniorum ΔcdgB+cdgB::egfp), that CdgB-eGFP displayed unipolar, bipolar and multisite distributions (S5 Fig). This compartmentalization could play a role in controlling the activity of this bifunctional enzyme perhaps through a signal sensed by the MHYT domain in the periplasm.

Discussion

A. baldaniorum Sp245 is an environmental bacterium capable of establishing mutualistic relationships with a variety of plants. Both as a soil dwelling bacterium and a symbiont, A. baldaniorum Sp245 is exposed to a plethora of signals that need to be integrated by sensory modules to adapt its behavior and increase fitness. Signaling modules that incorporate the second messenger c-di-GMP are crucial for this bacterium to engage in sessile or motile lifestyles [2, 1719, 63]. Here we reported our findings regarding the characterization of a GGDEF-EAL protein with PAS and MHYT sensory domains which we named CdgB. Proteins with GGDEF-EAL tandem domains can be grouped based on the conservation of the GGDEF and EAL motifs. Some of these proteins have only one of the two motifs conserved [47], both domains degenerated [64, 65], or both motifs conserved [10, 47, 66]. Typically, even when both motifs are conserved, these proteins have a predominant catalytic activity. Evidence has been accumulating of the role of bifunctional GGDEF-EAL proteins with dual enzymatic activity (DGC and PDE). The predominant activity of these proteins is controlled by self-made or external signals [6769]. Our results strongly suggest that CdgB is a bifunctional enzyme. In the genetic background of A. baldaniorum Sp245, under the conditions tested, overproduction of CdgB results in phenotypic changes typically associated with the activity of PDEs. Interestingly, in a heterologous host the predominant activity observed was of DGC. These differences could stem from signals that are species-specific or the result of the growth conditions used for these experiments. We speculate that the different behavior of CdgB in E. coli could be due to differences in nitrogen metabolism. Recently Park et al. [70] demonstrated that a nitrite transporter stimulated biofilm formation by controlled NO production via appropriate nitrite reductase suppression and subsequent diguanylate cyclase activation, and c-di-GMP production in E. coli and P. aeruginosa. Additionally, E. coli possesses a transcription factor named NorR with a non-heme iron center to sense NO [71], indication of different regulation mechanisms. More work needs to be done to elucidate what could be favoring the DGC activity of CdgB in E. coli.

The sensory domain MHYT could potentially play an important role in controlling the enzymatic activity of CdgB. The first characterized hybrid protein DGC-PDE with an MHYT domain was YkoW from Bacillus subtilis although the involvement of this domain in signal perception and enzymatic function could not be ascertained. Nevertheless, it was proposed that the MHYT domain could potentially sense O2, CO, or NO through the coordination of one or two copper atoms [46]. Other proteins characterized to date with an MHYT domain are NbdA and MucR from P. aeruginosa both implicated in NO-mediated biofilm dispersion. The deletion of nbdA and mucR impaired NO-induced biofilm dispersion, only NbdA appeared to be specific to the NO-induced dispersion response. Although MucR was shown to play a role in biofilm dispersion in response to NO and glutamate, exposure to NO in the presence of MucR but the absence of NbdA did not result in increased PDE activity. MucR is one of the few proteins harboring both EAL and GGDEF domains that possess both DGC and PDE activity [47, 66]. Furthermore, MucR is proposed to interact with the alginate biosynthesis protein Alg44, which contains a c-di-GMP binding PilZ domain essential for alginate biosynthesis [5, 66]. Recently, other MucR homologous protein was described in Azotobacter vinelandii implicated in the alginate biosynthesis too [72].

Oxygen and nitric oxide are key signals during the establishment of A. baldaniorum Sp245 as a symbiont [2, 40]. Interestingly, there are at least two chemotaxis receptors, Tlp1 and Aer, involved in O2 sensing that incorporate c-di-GMP detection through a conserved PilZ domain [2, 4]. Aer also integrates other chemical cues produced by the roots [4]. These chemosensory receptors could be potential signaling partners of CdgB which could perhaps sense similar chemotaxis signals. The PAS domain of CdgB could add another layer to its sensory repertoire. This domain is present in a variety of bacterial signaling proteins; and is able to bind several molecules, such as oxygen and Flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) [9, 73]. NO has been shown to promote root growth promotion [74] and biofilm formation in A. baldaniorum Sp245, the absence of a periplasmic nitrate reductase (Nap) significantly affects biofilm formation through a mechanism yet to be explored [40]. Since the MHYT domain has been proposed to sense NO it is tempting to speculate that CdgB could participate in a singling module that controls biofilm formation in response to nitric oxide. We speculate that NO may be sensed by the MHYT domain of CdgB. Reception of this signal may influence CdgB activity by modulating DGC activity and possibly PDE domain activity. Nevertheless, the molecular details of this mechanism remain largely unknown, and need more analyses.

The polar localization of CdgB is intriguing. It remains to be shown if this recruitment occurs in the flagellated cell pole and who are the interacting partners of CdgB. Cellular compartmentalization of signaling modules opens the possibility of localized sensing and short-range signal transduction to a closely localized effector. Future work will be aimed to identify potential members of the CdgB signaling module.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Genetic context and MHYT alignment of CdgB.

(A) Genetic context of the cdgB gene (AZOBR_410089) which codifies the CdgB protein is composed of a putative lysR gene upstream (AZOBR_410088) and a gene of unknown function downstream (AZOBR_410090). (B) Schematic representation of the domain structures of CdgB. The numbers represent the start and end amino acid of the predicted domains based on SMART database. (C) The Sequence alignment of the MHYT domain of CdgB with other c-di-GMP metabolizing proteins harboring an MHYT domain: the YkoW protein of B. subtilis, NbdA and MucR of P. aeruginosa. The three MHYT motifs are labeled by black squares and the transmembrane regions determined by the SMART and TOPCONS programs are highlighted in red.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Phylogenetic analysis of cdgB gene.

Phylogenetic tree showing the cdgB gene of A. baldaniorum Sp245 conserved in the alphaproteobacteria class. Nucleotide sequences of cdgB gene and homologous related genes were aligned by Clustal Omega. Phylogenetic tree files were generated by MEGA version VII. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood method and Tamura-Nei substitution model, with 1000 bootstrap replications.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Growth curve of A. baldaniorum Sp245, A. baldaniorum pMP2444, A. baldaniorum+pMP-cdgB, A. baldaniorum ΔcdgB, and A. baldaniorum ΔcdgB +pMP-cdgB.

The strains were grown in NFB* media. Growth was measured at OD600 nm every 2–3 hours. Cultures were kept for 24 h at 30°C under agitation (150 rpm). Data showed is representative from three independent cultures of each strain.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Western blot detection of CdgB-eGFP and ΔMHYT-CdgB-eGFP fusions.

Detection by Western blotting of CdgB::eGFP fusion proteins from soluble and detergent treatment protein extracts of A. baldaniorum cdgB::egfp strain, and the truncated protein variant from the ΔMHYT-cdgB::egfp derivative strain, harboring the plasmid pMP+cdgBΔMHYT. The GFP D5.1 Rabbit mAb, HRP Conjugate against GFP was used. Lane 1 A.baldaniorum cdgB::egfp; lane 2 ΔMHYT-cdgB, variant protein; lane 3. A. baldaniorum pMP2444. The relative molecular weight (MMr) is indicated as kDa. The black arrows indicate MMr in kDa. The corresponding figures represent the proteins indicate in each well.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Subcellular localization of CdgB in A. baldaniorum strains.

A) A. baldaniorum+ cdgB::egfp, B) A. baldaniorum ΔcdgB+cdgB::egfp were grown in NFB* medium. Photographs of the GFP fusion protein in WT and ΔcdgB strains were detected using a fluorescence microscope (TE 2000U; Nikon). Different subcellular locations of protein CdgB-eGFP including polar, bipolar, multisite were visualized. In red is showed membrane lipids with FM4-64FX, in green the CdgB-eGFP fusion, and blue bacterial nucleoid staining with DAPI. The images are representative of three biology repeats. Scale bar correspond to 10 μm.

(TIF)

S1 Video. Visualization of A. baldaniorum cdgB::egfp. Time-lapse.

The samples were scanned at an x/y scanning resolution of 1,024 x 1,024 pixels. Step size in z directions was 0.05 μm. The Plan Apo VC 60X WI objective was used. The eGFP was excited at 488nm, and the FM4-64FX was excited at 561 nm with objective lens WI (water immersion).

(AVI)

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Martha Minjárez Saénz for initial technical assistance (Structural analysis of CdgB).

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), Grant INFRA-2014-01-225923, and the financial support of Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Estudios de Posgrado (VIEP). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Boehm A, Kaiser M, Li H, Spangler C, Kasper CA, Ackermann M, et al. Second Messenger-Mediated Adjustment of Bacterial Swimming Velocity. Cell. 2010;141: 107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Russell MH, Bible AN, Fang X, Gooding JR, Campagna SR, Gomelsky M, et al. Integration of the second messenger c-di-GMP into the chemotactic signaling pathway. mBio. 2013;4: e00001–00013. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00001-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Römling U, Galperin MY. Bacterial cellulose biosynthesis: diversity of operons, subunits, products, and functions. Trends Microbiol. 2015/06/12 ed. 2015;23: 545–557. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.05.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.O’Neal L, Akhter S, Alexandre G. A PilZ-Containing Chemotaxis Receptor Mediates Oxygen and Wheat Root Sensing in Azospirillum brasilense. Front Microbiol. 2019;10: 312. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hay ID, Remminghorst U, Rehm BHA. MucR, a novel membrane-associated regulator of alginate biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75: 1110–1120. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02416-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Guttenplan SB, Kearns DB. Regulation of flagellar motility during biofilm formation. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013;37: 849–871. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jenal U, Reinders A, Lori C. Cyclic di-GMP: second messenger extraordinaire. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15: 271–284. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Römling U, Galperin MY, Gomelsky M. Cyclic di-GMP: the first 25 years of a universal bacterial second messenger. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev MMBR. 2013;77: 1–52. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00043-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Qi Y, Rao F, Luo Z, Liang Z-X. A flavin cofactor-binding PAS domain regulates c-di-GMP synthesis in AxDGC2 from Acetobacter xylinum. Biochemistry. 2009;48: 10275–10285. doi: 10.1021/bi901121w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bharati BK, Sharma IM, Kasetty S, Kumar M, Mukherjee R, Chatterji D. A full-length bifunctional protein involved in c-di-GMP turnover is required for long-term survival under nutrient starvation in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Microbiol Read Engl. 2012;158: 1415–1427. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.053892-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Seshasayee ASN, Fraser GM, Luscombe NM. Comparative genomics of cyclic-di-GMP signalling in bacteria: post-translational regulation and catalytic activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38: 5970–5981. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mata AR, Pacheco CM, Cruz Pérez JF, Sáenz MM, Baca BE. In silico comparative analysis of GGDEF and EAL domain signaling proteins from the Azospirillum genomes. BMC Microbiol. 2018;18: 20. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1157-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dos Santos Ferreira N, Hayashi Sant’ Anna F, Massena Reis V, Ambrosini A, Gazolla Volpiano C, Rothballer M, et al. Genome-based reclassification of Azospirillum brasilense Sp245 as the type strain of Azospirillum baldaniorum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70: 6203–6212. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bashan Y, de-Bashan LE, Prabhu SR, Hernandez J-P. Advances in plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculant technology: formulations and practical perspectives (1998–2013). Plant Soil. 2014;378: 1–33. doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1956-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yaacovokon @_. AGRONOMIC APPLICATIONS OF AZOSPIRILLUM: AN EVALUATION OF 20 YEARS WORLDWIDE FIELD INOCULATION. 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ramirez-Mata A, Pacheco MR, Moreno SJ, Xiqui-Vazquez ML, Baca BE. Versatile use of Azospirillum brasilense strains tagged with egfp and mCherry genes for the visualization of biofilms associated with wheat roots. Microbiol Res. 2018;215: 155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2018.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ramírez-Mata A, López-Lara LI, Xiqui-Vázquez ML, Jijón-Moreno S, Romero-Osorio A, Baca BE. The cyclic-di-GMP diguanylate cyclase CdgA has a role in biofilm formation and exopolysaccharide production in Azospirillum brasilense. Res Microbiol. 2016;167: 190–201. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2015.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sierra Cacho D, Zamorano Sánchez DS, Xiqui-Vázquez ML, Viruega Góngora VI, Ramírez-Mata A, Baca BE. CdgC, a Cyclic-di-GMP Diguanylate Cyclase of Azospirillum baldaniorum Is Involved in Internalization to Wheat Roots. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12: 748393. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.748393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cruz-Pérez JF, Lara-Oueilhe R, Marcos-Jiménez C, Cuatlayotl-Olarte R, Xiqui-Vázquez ML, Reyes-Carmona SR, et al. Expression and function of the cdgD gene, encoding a CHASE–PAS-DGC-EAL domain protein, in Azospirillum brasilense. Sci Rep. 2021;11: 520. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80125-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Letunic I, Copley RR, Pils B, Pinkert S, Schultz J, Bork P. SMART 5: domains in the context of genomes and networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34: D257–260. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Finn RD, Mistry J, Schuster-Böckler B, Griffiths-Jones S, Hollich V, Lassmann T, et al. Pfam: clans, web tools and services. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34: D247–251. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Omasits U, Ahrens CH, Müller S, Wollscheid B. Protter: interactive protein feature visualization and integration with experimental proteomic data. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2014;30: 884–886. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7: 539. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gille C, Fähling M, Weyand B, Wieland T, Gille A. Alignment-Annotator web server: rendering and annotating sequence alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42: W3–W6. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yang J, Yan R, Roy A, Xu D, Poisson J, Zhang Y. The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction. Nat Methods. 2015;12: 7–8. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Waterhouse A, Bertoni M, Bienert S, Studer G, Tauriello G, Gumienny R, et al. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46: W296–W303. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liu C, Liew CW, Wong YH, Tan ST, Poh WH, Manimekalai MSS, et al. Insights into Biofilm Dispersal Regulation from the Crystal Structure of the PAS-GGDEF-EAL Region of RbdA from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 2018;200. doi: 10.1128/JB.00515-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bellini D, Horrell S, Hutchin A, Phippen CW, Strange RW, Cai Y, et al. Dimerisation induced formation of the active site and the identification of three metal sites in EAL-phosphodiesterases. Sci Rep. 2017;7: 42166. doi: 10.1038/srep42166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Williams CJ, Headd JJ, Moriarty NW, Prisant MG, Videau LL, Deis LN, et al. MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation: PROTEIN SCIENCE.ORG. Protein Sci. 2018;27: 293–315. doi: 10.1002/pro.3330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, et al. UCSF ChimeraA visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem. 2004;25: 1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kim S, Chen J, Cheng T, Gindulyte A, He J, He S, et al. PubChem in 2021: new data content and improved web interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49: D1388–D1395. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hanwell MD, Curtis DE, Lonie DC, Vandermeersch T, Zurek E, Hutchison GR. Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform. J Cheminformatics. 2012;4: 17. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-4-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, Sanner MF, Belew RK, Goodsell DS, et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem. 2009;30: 2785–2791. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Simon R, Priefer U, Pühler A. A Broad Host Range Mobilization System for In Vivo Genetic Engineering: Transposon Mutagenesis in Gram Negative Bacteria. Bio/Technology. 1983;1: 784–791. doi: 10.1038/nbt1183-784 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Baldani VLD, Baldani JI Dr, _bereiner J. Inoculation of field-grown wheat (Triticum aestivum) with Azospirillum spp. in Brazil. Biol Fertil Soils. 2004;4: 37–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bloemberg GV, Wijfjes AHM, Lamers GEM, Stuurman N, Lugtenberg BJJ. Simultaneous Imaging of Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 Populations Expressing Three Different Autofluorescent Proteins in the Rhizosphere: New Perspectives for Studying Microbial Communities. Mol Plant-Microbe Interactions®. 2000;13: 1170–1176. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.11.1170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Martínez-Méndez R, Camacho-Hernández DA, Sulvarán-Guel E, Zamorano-Sánchez D. A Trigger Phosphodiesterase Modulates the Global c-di-GMP Pool, Motility, and Biofilm Formation in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. O’Toole G, editor. J Bacteriol. 2021;203. doi: 10.1128/JB.00046-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Green MR, Sambrook J, Sambrook J. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 4th ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yang L, Ukil L, Osmani A, Nahm F, Davies J, De Souza CPC, et al. Rapid Production of Gene Replacement Constructs and Generation of a Green Fluorescent Protein-Tagged Centromeric Marker in Aspergillus nidulans. Eukaryot Cell. 2004;3: 1359–1362. doi: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Arruebarrena Di Palma A, M. Pereyra C, Moreno Ramirez L, Xiqui Vázquez M, Baca BE, Pereyra MA, et al. Denitrification-derived nitric oxide modulates biofilm formation in Azospirillum brasilense. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013;338: 77–85. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jijón-Moreno S, Baca BE, Castro-Fernández DC, Ramírez-Mata A. TyrR is involved in the transcriptional regulation of biofilm formation and D-alanine catabolism in Azospirillum brasilense Sp7. Koraimann G, editor. PLOS ONE. 2019;14: e0211904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Alexandre G. Coupling metabolism and chemotaxis-dependent behaviours by energy taxis receptors. Microbiology. 2010;156: 2283–2293. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.039214-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhou H, Zheng C, Su J, Chen B, Fu Y, Xie Y, et al. Characterization of a natural triple-tandem c-di-GMP riboswitch and application of the riboswitch-based dual-fluorescence reporter. Sci Rep. 2016;6: 20871. doi: 10.1038/srep20871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shihan MH, Novo SG, Le Marchand SJ, Wang Y, Duncan MK. A simple method for quantitating confocal fluorescent images. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2021;25: 100916. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2021.100916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wisniewski-Dyé F, Borziak K, Khalsa-Moyers G, Alexandre G, Sukharnikov LO, Wuichet K, et al. Azospirillum Genomes Reveal Transition of Bacteria from Aquatic to Terrestrial Environments. Richardson PM, editor. PLoS Genet. 2011;7: e1002430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Galperin MY, Gaidenko TA, Mulkidjanian AY, Nakano M, Price CW. MHYT, a new integral membrane sensor domain. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001;205: 17–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10919.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Li Y, Heine S, Entian M, Sauer K, Frankenberg-Dinkel N. NO-Induced Biofilm Dispersion in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Is Mediated by an MHYT Domain-Coupled Phosphodiesterase. J Bacteriol. 2013;195: 3531–3542. doi: 10.1128/JB.01156-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wassmann P, Chan C, Paul R, Beck A, Heerklotz H, Jenal U, et al. Structure of BeF3- -modified response regulator PleD: implications for diguanylate cyclase activation, catalysis, and feedback inhibition. Struct Lond Engl 1993. 2007;15: 915–927. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2007.06.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pérez-Mendoza D, Coulthurst SJ, Humphris S, Campbell E, Welch M, Toth IK, et al. A multi-repeat adhesin of the phytopathogen, Pectobacterium atrosepticum, is secreted by a Type I pathway and is subject to complex regulation involving a non-canonical diguanylate cyclase: Complex regulation of a Pectobacterium type I-secreted adhesin. Mol Microbiol. 2011;82: 719–733. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07849.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dahlstrom KM O ’Toole GA. A Symphony of Cyclases: Specificity in Diguanylate Cyclase Signaling. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2017;71: 179–195. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-090816-093325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chen Z, Schaap P. The prokaryote messenger c-di-GMP triggers stalk cell differentiation in Dictyostelium. Nature. 2012;488: 680–683. doi: 10.1038/nature11313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rao F, Yang Y, Qi Y, Liang Z-X. Catalytic Mechanism of Cyclic Di-GMP-Specific Phosphodiesterase: a Study of the EAL Domain-Containing RocR from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 2008;190: 3622–3631. doi: 10.1128/JB.00165-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Phippen CW, Mikolajek H, Schlaefli HG, Keevil CW, Webb JS, Tews I. Formation and dimerization of the phosphodiesterase active site of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa MorA, a bi-functional c-di-GMP regulator. FEBS Lett. 2014;588: 4631–4636. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Guo Y, Liu S, Tang X, Yang F. Role of c-di-GMP in anammox aggregation and systematic analysis of its turnover protein in Candidatus Jettenia caeni. Water Res. 2017;113: 181–190. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tchigvintsev A, Xu X, Singer A, Chang C, Brown G, Proudfoot M, et al. Structural Insight into the Mechanism of c-di-GMP Hydrolysis by EAL Domain Phosphodiesterases. J Mol Biol. 2010;402: 524–538. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.07.050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jones CJ, Wozniak DJ. Congo Red Stain Identifies Matrix Overproduction and Is an Indirect Measurement for c-di-GMP in Many Species of Bacteria. In: Sauer K, editor. c-di-GMP Signaling. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2017. pp. 147–156. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7240-1_12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Muriel C, Arrebola E, Redondo-Nieto M, Martínez-Granero F, Jalvo B, Pfeilmeier S, et al. AmrZ is a major determinant of c-di-GMP levels in Pseudomonas fluorescens F113. Sci Rep. 2018;8: 1979. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20419-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Del Gallo M, Negi M, Neyra CA. Calcofluor- and lectin-binding exocellular polysaccharides of Azospirillum brasilense and Azospirillum lipoferum. J Bacteriol. 1989;171: 3504–3510. doi: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Khan MSA, Altaf MM, Ahmad I. Chemical Nature of Biofilm Matrix and Its Significance. In: Ahmad I, Husain FM, editors. Biofilms in Plant and Soil Health. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2017. pp. 151–177. doi: 10.1002/9781119246329.ch9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tan H, West JA, Ramsay JP, Monson RE, Griffin JL, Toth IK, et al. Comprehensive overexpression analysis of cyclic-di-GMP signalling proteins in the phytopathogen Pectobacterium atrosepticum reveals diverse effects on motility and virulence phenotypes. Microbiology. 2014;160: 1427–1439. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Rossmann FM, Rick T, Mrusek D, Sprankel L, Dörrich AK, Leonhard T, et al. The GGDEF Domain of the Phosphodiesterase PdeB in Shewanella putrefaciens Mediates Recruitment by the Polar Landmark Protein HubP. O’Toole G, editor. J Bacteriol. 2019;201. doi: 10.1128/JB.00534-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Yan W, Wei Y, Fan S, Yu C, Tian F, Wang Q, et al. Diguanylate Cyclase GdpX6 with c-di-GMP Binding Activity Involved in the Regulation of Virulence Expression in Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Microorganisms. 2021;9: 495. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9030495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Carreño-López R, Sánchez A, Camargo N, Elmerich C, Baca BE. Characterization of chsA, a new gene controlling the chemotactic response in Azospirillum brasilense Sp7. Arch Microbiol. 2009;191: 501–507. doi: 10.1007/s00203-009-0475-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Navarro MVAS, De N, Bae N, Wang Q, Sondermann H. Structural Analysis of the GGDEF-EAL Domain-Containing c-di-GMP Receptor FimX. Structure. 2009;17: 1104–1116. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2009.06.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yang F, Tian F, Li X, Fan S, Chen H, Wu M, et al. The Degenerate EAL-GGDEF Domain Protein Filp Functions as a Cyclic di-GMP Receptor and Specifically Interacts with the PilZ-Domain Protein PXO_02715 to Regulate Virulence in Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Mol Plant-Microbe Interactions®. 2014;27: 578–589. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-12-13-0371-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wang Y, Hay ID, Rehman ZU, Rehm BHA. Membrane-anchored MucR mediates nitrate-dependent regulation of alginate production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99: 7253–7265. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6591-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Trimble MJ, McCarter LL. Bis-(3′-5′)-cyclic dimeric GMP-linked quorum sensing controls swarming in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108: 18079–18084. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113790108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Feirer N, Xu J, Allen KD, Koestler BJ, Bruger EL, Waters CM, et al. A Pterin-Dependent Signaling Pathway Regulates a Dual-Function Diguanylate Cyclase-Phosphodiesterase Controlling Surface Attachment in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Parsek M, Greenberg EP, editors. mBio. 2015;6: e00156–15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00156-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bridges AA, Prentice JA, Fei C, Wingreen NS, Bassler BL. Quantitative input–output dynamics of a c-di-GMP signal transduction cascade in Vibrio cholerae. Waldor MK, editor. PLOS Biol. 2022;20: e3001585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Park J-S, Choi H-Y, Kim W-G. The Nitrite Transporter Facilitates Biofilm Formation via Suppression of Nitrite Reductase and Is a New Antibiofilm Target in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Goldberg JB, editor. mBio. 2020;11: e00878–20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00878-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.D’Autréaux B, Tucker NP, Dixon R, Spiro S. A non-haem iron centre in the transcription factor NorR senses nitric oxide. Nature. 2005;437: 769–772. doi: 10.1038/nature03953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Martínez-Ortiz IC, Ahumada-Manuel CL, Hsueh BY, Guzmán J, Moreno S, Cocotl-Yañez M, et al. Cyclic di-GMP-Mediated Regulation of Extracellular Mannuronan C-5 Epimerases Is Essential for Cyst Formation in Azotobacter vinelandii. Galperin MY, editor. J Bacteriol. 2020;202. doi: 10.1128/JB.00135-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Taylor BL, Zhulin IB. PAS domains: internal sensors of oxygen, redox potential, and light. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev MMBR. 1999;63: 479–506. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.63.2.479-506.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Creus CM, Graziano M, Casanovas EM, Pereyra MA, Simontacchi M, Puntarulo S, et al. Nitric Oxide is Involved in the Azospirillum brasilense-induced Lateral Root Formation in Tomato. Planta. 2005;221: 297–303. doi: 10.1007/s00425-005-1523-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ching-Hong Yang

11 Sep 2022

PONE-D-22-21548The GGDEF-EAL protein CdgB from Azospirillum baldaniorum Sp245, is a dual function enzyme with potential polar localizationPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Ramírez-Mata,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process, specifically the below items. 

Clarification of cdgB was cloned along with its native promoter or under the plac

A quantification of cellular c-di-GMP level in A. baldanorium strains

Explain clearly on what is the difference between CdgB and previously reported GGDEF-EAL proteins in the discussion 

Predict the function of CdgB in the mutualistic relationships between Azospirillum baldaniorum and plants Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 26 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ching-Hong Yang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

"Include this sentence at the end of your statement: The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

At this time, please address the following queries:

a) Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution. 

b) State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

c) If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders.

d) If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: 

"VIVG received a scholarship from the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de Mexico (CONACYT). This work was financially supported by CONACYT, number grant: INFR-2014-01-225923), Vicerrectoria de Investigación y Estudios de Posgrado (VIEP)."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. 

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: 

"Include this sentence at the end of your statement: The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

5. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels. 

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

6. Please upload a new copy of Figures 2, 3, and 7 as the detail is not clear. Please follow the link for more information: https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/06/looking-good-tips-for-creating-your-plos-figures-graphics/

https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/06/looking-good-tips-for-creating-your-plos-figures-graphics/

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript requires a few more experimentation and explanations to some of the aspects discussed. Statistical analysis between samples is unclear and needs revision. The graphs with bars and T-test analysis and their legends are not enough explanatory, and requires minor changes. Please see the specific comments attached. Revisions would significantly benefit the manuscript for the readers.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript by Alberto Ramírez-Mata et al entitled “The GGDEF-EAL protein CdgB from Azospirillum baldaniorum Sp245, is a dual function enzyme with potential polar localization” is well written and presented. Experiments appear to have been well performed and results clear. The authors studied the dual activity of CdgB, a predicted MHYT-PAS-GGEDF-EAL multidomain protein from Azospirillum baldaniorum.

The manuscript will be improved if the authors state state more clearly what is the difference between CdgB and previously reported GGDEF-EAL proteins in discussion. This was metioned in line 494-500 but in my opinion, this didn’t go far enough.

In addition, could the author predict the function of CdgB in the mutualistic relationships between Azospirillum baldaniorum and plants?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Fan Susu

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Specific comments.docx

PLoS One. 2022 Nov 23;17(11):e0278036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278036.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


24 Oct 2022

Minor comments

-- Line 26: change “stablishing” to establishing. Corrected

-- Line 27: in silico italicize. Corrected

-- Line 30: Sp245. It inhibits… Corrected

-- Line 34: MHYT domain negatively affects extracellular… Corrected

-- Line 37: under certain conditions… Corrected

-- Line 45: plays a central role in microbial cellular behaviors in response to the environment… Corrected

-- Line 53: delete “,” after intra-. Corrected (Line 54)

-- Line 59: Bioinformatic. Corrected (Line 60)

-- Line 81: CdgB DGC and PDE activity under same conditions or different? Please mention. Corrected (Line 82)

-- Line 85: What is PGPR? First time used abbreviation should be elaborated. Corrected (Line 87)

-- Line 113: Gentamicin. Corrected (Line 114)

-- Line 245-46: How did you measure the color intensity? Please mention. Corrected, we added the following text: The relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) was calculated as the ratio between the TurboRFP and AmCyan fluorescence intensities and is directly proportional to c-di-GMP levels, as analyzed using ImageJ software. The RFI values represent the standard deviations of three biological replicates, and significant differences are indicated at * P < 0.05 according to Student´s t-test by SigmaPlot as previously described (Lines 257-261)

-- Line 311: proposed to be… Corrected (Line 320)

-- Line 449: riboswitches? Or riboswitch? Please specify one or multiple. Corrected (Line 242)

-- Line 508: Bacillus subtilis, although… Corrected (Line 594)

Major comments

Request 1

-- Line 144: For overexpression of cdgB was cloned along with its native promoter? Or the ORF of the gene was cloned in frame under the plac? If the native promoter was included, then there is a possibility of additional regulation at the cdgB promoter. The phenotypes observed in A. baldaniorum might include additional effects of cdgB transcriptional regulation. The experiments with overexpression of cdgB will benefit from constitutive expression under lac promoter.

Response 1

cdgB gene overexpression is under the control of the lac promoter only. We corrected the mistake. The full-length ORF of cdgB gene (Line 145).

Request 2

Additional suggestion: to support the expression of all the native and mutated variants of CdgB, a western blot of tagged protein would be strong evidence for full expression of the protein variants. This would confirm that the phenotypes observed was not because of any artifacts.

Response 2

We agree that without the requested evidence, it is not possible to discard potential stability effects of introducing point mutations into cdgB. Since we do not have specific antibodies to detect these proteins it would not be possible to provide these data in time for the revision deadline. However, multiple reports have used the same type of point mutations in DGC-PDE proteins with no effect on stability. We did analyze the stability of the fusions CdgB-eGFP full-length and CdgBΔMHYT-eGFP by western blot using an eGFP antibody (S4 figure) (Lines 205, 416-417) and did not observed differences between them. In the revised version of the manuscript we show that the fusion protein expressed from pMP-cdgB::egfp is functional in biofilm and Congo Red assays (figures 4 and 5).

Request 3

-- Fig 4, 5 and 7: Biofilm, EPS production and swimming assay- the T test and the annotations on the graph for statistical significance is confusing and doesn’t compare all the samples tested. A One-way ANOVA followed by a multiple comparison test (Like Tukey’s test) would actually compare all the sample sets and give the readers a clear idea of the statistically significant differences among each of the samples. Also, was T-test performed between each of the samples or just between each control and their corresponding tests samples? Need a mention. The asterisks and the labels above the bars in the graphs are not clear which samples are being compared. This can be explained briefly in figure legends.

Response 3

In response to the reviewer comments, we remade the plots from figures 4, 5 and 7. We deleted the marks on plots and compared each control with their corresponding tests samples.

Request 4

-- The c-di-GMP differences in various strains and overexpression of cdgB was measured mostly by qualitative methods. A quantitative measurement of cellular c-di-GMP would be helpful to understand the dominance of either DGC or PDE activity of CdgB under different conditions.

Response 4

In response to the reviewer comments, in the revised version of the manuscript we provide quantitative values for the results obtained using the c-di-GMP reporter (See figure 8). To quantify the fluorescence of cells from fluorescent images, we used a previously reported method described by (Cruz-Pérez et al 2021 and Shihan M et al 2021). The excitation and emission settings for the detection of Amcyan and TurboRFP were 457/520 nm and 553/574 nm, respectively. The relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) was calculated by dividing the arbitrary fluorescent intensity units of TurboRFP by those of Amcyan as previously described (Cruz-Pérez et al 2021; Shihan MH et al 2021.) Experiments were repeated at least three times.

References

Cruz-Pérez JF, Lara-Oueilhe R, Marcos-Jiménez C, Cuatlayotl-Olarte R, Xiqui-Vázquez ML, Reyes-Carmona SR, Baca BE, Ramírez-Mata A. Expression and function of the cdgD gene, encoding a CHASE-PAS-DGC-EAL domain protein, in Azospirillum brasilense. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):520. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80125-3. PMID: 33436847; PMCID: PMC7804937.

Shihan MH, Novo SG, Le Marchand SJ, Wang Y, Duncan MK. A simple method for quantitating confocal fluorescent images. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2021 Feb 1;25:100916. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2021.100916. PMID: 33553685; PMCID: PMC7856428.

Request 5

-- A quantification of cellular c-di-GMP level in A. baldanorium strains is required. The differences of phenotypes (like biofilm, swimming, etc.) observed in the strains because of deletion or overexpression of cdgB is caused by variation of c-di-GMP level, needs to be established.

Response 5

We agree it is important to optimize a methodology to quantify c-di-GMP levels in A. baldinorium. We could not use the same fluorescent c-di-GMP biosensor that allowed us to detect c-di-GMP levels in E. coli because the plasmid used for overexpression of cdgB in A. baldinorium is of the same incompatibility group as the plasmid that harbors the c-di-GMP biosensor. We are beginning the quantitative standardization of c-di-GMP level by HPLC coupled to mass spectrometry. In a future work we are planning to measure c-di-GMP levels in A. baldanorium cells grown under different conditions, such as presence and absence of NO, O2, CO2 and other type of signals.

Request 6

-- The DGC activity of CdgB increased by overexpression in E. coli but the reverse in A. baldanorium. Is it host specific? Requires an elaboration in the discussion section. A quantitative measurement of cellular c-di-GMP can be done with overexpression of cdgB in both A. baldanorium and E. coli under the same or similar condition and a comparison can be shown to determine the concentration-dependent catalytic activity of CdgB. Then conclusion can be made whether the DGC activity of CdgB in E. coli is host-specific or conditional.

Response 6

We consider the observation that CdgB acts mainly as a DGC in E. coli as evidence of its capability of dual activity. The factors that affect the activity switch will be explored in future work. In A. baldanorium it appears that the abundance of CdgB could affect the DGC-PDE switch. The absence of CdgB results in a decrease in biofilm formation, a phenotype that is positively influenced by c-di-GMP. This would suggest that at baseline levels CdgB may act as a DGC. When cdgB is overexpressed in a genetic background that has a native copy of cdgB, biofilm formation is also inhibited. This would suggest that in these conditions CdgB has switched from DGC to PDE activity. Interestingly, when a variant with a putative dead PDE domain was overproduced biofilm formation was significantly induced. This strongly suggests that CdgB can switch between the two activities in A. baldanorium. We speculate that the different behavior of CdgB in E. coli could be due to differences in nitrogen metabolism. Recently Park et al 2020 demonstrated that a nitrite transporter stimulated biofilm formation by controlled NO production via appropriate nitrite reductase suppression and subsequent diguanylate cyclase activation, and c-di-GMP production in E. coli and P. aeruginosa. Additionally, E. coli possesses a transcription factor named NorR with a non-heme iron center to sense NO (D'Autréaux B, et al 2005), indication of different regulation mechanisms. More work needs to be done to elucidate what could be favoring the DGC activity of CdgB in E. coli (Lines 583-591)

Reference

Park JS, Choi HY, Kim WG. The Nitrite Transporter Facilitates Biofilm Formation via Suppression of Nitrite Reductase and Is a New Antibiofilm Target in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mBio. 2020 Jul 7;11(4):e00878-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00878-20. PMID: 32636243; PMCID: PMC7343986.

D'Autréaux B, Tucker NP, Dixon R, Spiro S. A non-haem iron centre in the transcription factor NorR senses nitric oxide. Nature. 2005 Sep 29;437(7059):769-72. doi: 10.1038/nature03953. PMID: 16193057.

Request 7

-- Deletion of cdgB resulted in a different phenotype compared to overexpression in A. baldanorium. This suggests that high cellular concentration of CdgB increases its PDE activity in A. baldanorium. This means that increased transcription and subsequently translation of cdgB is responsible for reduced c-di-GMP in the bacterium in response to the environment. An experiment showing transcription of cdgB and also its translation under different conditions such as presence and absence of NO, O2 and CO2 followed by measurement of intracellular c-di-GMP levels in A. baldanorium. It can be beneficial and complement the data shown in the manuscript. This experiment can be used to determine if the PDE and DGC activity of CdgB is dependent on its intracellular concentration or environmental signals, since the signals perceived by this protein is to be determined in future.

Response 7

The reviewer’s suggestion is very interesting. Our goal for this manuscript is to be the anchor point for future analysis. The mater of the regulation of cdgB is one of our current interests. It is unclear if cdgB has its own promoter upstream or if it is co-transcribed with its neighbor genes, a putative lysR gene upstream and a gene of unknown function downstream (see S1 Figure) (Lines 892-894). Together with an in-depth characterization of the regulatory region of cdgB, as the reviewer suggested, we are looking to analyze how its expression is affected by signals that could be detected by the MHYT domains, such as NO, O2 and CO2.

Request 8

Explain clearly on what is the difference between CdgB and previously reported GGDEF-EAL proteins in the discussion.

The first characterized hybrid protein DGC-PDE with an MHYT domain was YkoW from Bacillus subtilis although the involvement of this domain in signal perception and enzymatic function could not be ascertained. Nevertheless, it was proposed that the MHYT domain could potentially sense O2, CO, or NO through the coordination of one or two copper atoms [46]. Other proteins characterized to date with an MHYT domain are NbdA and MucR from P. aeruginosa both implicated in NO-mediated biofilm dispersion. The deletion of nbdA and mucR impaired NO-induced biofilm dispersion, only NbdA appeared to be specific to the NO-induced dispersion response. Although MucR was shown to play a role in biofilm dispersion in response to NO and glutamate, exposure to NO in the presence of MucR but the absence of NbdA did not result in increased PDE activity. MucR is one of the few proteins harboring both EAL and GGDEF domains that possess both DGC and PDE activity [47,67]. Furthermore, MucR is proposed to interact with the alginate biosynthesis protein Alg44, which contains a c-di-GMP binding PilZ domain essential for alginate biosynthesis [5,67]. Recently, other MucR homologous protein was described in Azotobacter vinelandii implicated in the alginate biosynthesis too [73]. (Lines 597-608)

Request 9

Predict the function of CdgB in the mutualistic relationships between Azospirillum baldaniorum and plants.

NO has been shown to promote root growth promotion[75] and biofilm formation in A. baldaniorum Sp245, the absence of a periplasmic nitrate reductase (Nap) significantly affects biofilm formation through a mechanism yet to be explored [40]. Since the MHYT domain has been proposed to sense NO it is tempting to speculate that CdgB could participate in a singling module that controls biofilm formation in response to nitric oxide. We speculate that NO may be sensed by the MHYT domain of CdgB. Reception of this signal may influence CdgB activity by modulating DGC activity and possibly PDE domain activity. Nevertheless, the molecular details of this mechanism remain largely unknown, and need more analyses. (Lines 617-625)

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Ching-Hong Yang

9 Nov 2022

The GGDEF-EAL protein CdgB from Azospirillum baldaniorum Sp245, is a dual function enzyme with potential polar localization

PONE-D-22-21548R1

Dear Dr. Ramírez-Mata,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ching-Hong Yang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have sufficiently addressed all the concerns in their response to reviewers. I believe the manuscript is in a better shape than before.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Fan Susu

**********

Acceptance letter

Ching-Hong Yang

14 Nov 2022

PONE-D-22-21548R1

The GGDEF-EAL protein CdgB from Azospirillum baldaniorum Sp245, is a dual function enzyme with potential polar localization.

Dear Dr. Ramírez-Mata:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ching-Hong Yang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Genetic context and MHYT alignment of CdgB.

    (A) Genetic context of the cdgB gene (AZOBR_410089) which codifies the CdgB protein is composed of a putative lysR gene upstream (AZOBR_410088) and a gene of unknown function downstream (AZOBR_410090). (B) Schematic representation of the domain structures of CdgB. The numbers represent the start and end amino acid of the predicted domains based on SMART database. (C) The Sequence alignment of the MHYT domain of CdgB with other c-di-GMP metabolizing proteins harboring an MHYT domain: the YkoW protein of B. subtilis, NbdA and MucR of P. aeruginosa. The three MHYT motifs are labeled by black squares and the transmembrane regions determined by the SMART and TOPCONS programs are highlighted in red.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Phylogenetic analysis of cdgB gene.

    Phylogenetic tree showing the cdgB gene of A. baldaniorum Sp245 conserved in the alphaproteobacteria class. Nucleotide sequences of cdgB gene and homologous related genes were aligned by Clustal Omega. Phylogenetic tree files were generated by MEGA version VII. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood method and Tamura-Nei substitution model, with 1000 bootstrap replications.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Growth curve of A. baldaniorum Sp245, A. baldaniorum pMP2444, A. baldaniorum+pMP-cdgB, A. baldaniorum ΔcdgB, and A. baldaniorum ΔcdgB +pMP-cdgB.

    The strains were grown in NFB* media. Growth was measured at OD600 nm every 2–3 hours. Cultures were kept for 24 h at 30°C under agitation (150 rpm). Data showed is representative from three independent cultures of each strain.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Western blot detection of CdgB-eGFP and ΔMHYT-CdgB-eGFP fusions.

    Detection by Western blotting of CdgB::eGFP fusion proteins from soluble and detergent treatment protein extracts of A. baldaniorum cdgB::egfp strain, and the truncated protein variant from the ΔMHYT-cdgB::egfp derivative strain, harboring the plasmid pMP+cdgBΔMHYT. The GFP D5.1 Rabbit mAb, HRP Conjugate against GFP was used. Lane 1 A.baldaniorum cdgB::egfp; lane 2 ΔMHYT-cdgB, variant protein; lane 3. A. baldaniorum pMP2444. The relative molecular weight (MMr) is indicated as kDa. The black arrows indicate MMr in kDa. The corresponding figures represent the proteins indicate in each well.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Subcellular localization of CdgB in A. baldaniorum strains.

    A) A. baldaniorum+ cdgB::egfp, B) A. baldaniorum ΔcdgB+cdgB::egfp were grown in NFB* medium. Photographs of the GFP fusion protein in WT and ΔcdgB strains were detected using a fluorescence microscope (TE 2000U; Nikon). Different subcellular locations of protein CdgB-eGFP including polar, bipolar, multisite were visualized. In red is showed membrane lipids with FM4-64FX, in green the CdgB-eGFP fusion, and blue bacterial nucleoid staining with DAPI. The images are representative of three biology repeats. Scale bar correspond to 10 μm.

    (TIF)

    S1 Video. Visualization of A. baldaniorum cdgB::egfp. Time-lapse.

    The samples were scanned at an x/y scanning resolution of 1,024 x 1,024 pixels. Step size in z directions was 0.05 μm. The Plan Apo VC 60X WI objective was used. The eGFP was excited at 488nm, and the FM4-64FX was excited at 561 nm with objective lens WI (water immersion).

    (AVI)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Specific comments.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES