Abstract
Red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa) populations are currently declining in the Iberian Peninsula, mainly due to habitat degradation and hunting pressure. In addition, the release of farm-reared partridges may introduce pathogens, including parasites, to wild populations. The presence of digestive parasites in red-legged partridges hunted in fifteen Spanish provinces was studied. Fecal samples and gastrointestinal tracts were collected, analyzed, and the morphometric identification of parasites was carried out. Eimeria spp. oocysts, nematode, cestode and trematode eggs were observed in fecal samples. Adult nematodes (Ascaridia galli, Ascaridia compar, Heterakis gallinarum, Heterakis tenuicauda, Trichostrongylus tenuis, Subulura spp., Cyrnea spp. and Aonchotheca caudinflata), tapeworms (Raillietina tetragona, R. echinobothrida, R. micracantha, Rhabdometra nigropunctata, and Choanotaenia infundibulum), and trematodes (Brachylaima spp., Brachylecithum spp., Dicrocoelium spp.) were identified in the gastrointestinal tracts. Significant statistical differences were found among climatic regions in the prevalence and intensity of Eimeria spp. infection, median intensity and the prevalence of indirect life cycle helminths, with Southern areas always showing higher infection values. The study provides information of the health status of red-legged partridges in Spain, highlighting the risk associated with the release of farm-reared partridges for restocking purposes. This should be taken into account to improve management strategies for the long-term conservation of the species.
Keywords: Bioclimatic region, Eimeria, Helminths, Management, Parasites, Red-legged partridge
Introduction
The red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa) is a medium-size European galliform, with natural populations reported in Portugal, Andorra, France, Germany, Italy and Spain (Blanco-Aguiar et al. 2003; Birdlife International 2022). This species carries out an important ecological role in Mediterranean ecosystems (Díaz-Fernández et al. 2013), with a wide distribution in the Iberian Peninsula ranging from natural environments to farmland mosaics (Cabodevilla et al. 2021). In addition, the red-legged partridge is the principal prey for a large number of threatened species (Blanco-Aguiar et al. 2004; Arroyo et al. 2017). Also, the red-legged partridge has a significant socio-economic value as the main game bird species, with around 3 to 5 million of farm-reared partridges annually released in Spain for shooting (Blanco-Aguiar et al. 2003; Sánchez García-Abad et al. 2009).
During the last decade, red-legged partridge populations have declined by 40–45% in Europe (Birdlife International 2022). Agricultural intensification, with negative effects on suitable habitats for this galliform, is one of the main threats to its survival (Delibes-Mateos et al. 2012; Cabodevilla et al. 2021). On the other hand, overhunting, hybridization, predation and diseases are factors that have contributed to the reduction of red-legged partridge populations in the Iberian Peninsula (Calvete et al. 2003; Blanco-Aguiar et al. 2008; Buenestado et al. 2008, 2009; Villanúa et al. 2008; Casas and Viñuela 2010).
The main objective of hunting estate managers is to raise the availability of these birds and, therefore, populations are usually restocked with farm-reared partridges (Díaz-Fernández et al. 2013; Casas et al. 2016). Also, predator control or habitat management measures (water points, supplementary feeders or game crops) are frequently used to maintain or increase partridge population density, particularly in areas where hunting provides significant economic benefits (Gortázar et al. 2000; Arroyo et al. 2012). Specifically, water points, supplementary feeders or game crops are some of the measures used to improve the survival of released farm-reared individuals and to achieve their permanent settlement on hunting estates (Gortázar et al. 2000).
Previous studies have pointed out the differences between the parasite community of farm-reared and wild partridges (Millán et al. 2004b). Farm-reared partridges are usually infected by monoxenous nematodes such as Ascaridia spp., Heterakis spp. or Aonchoteca caudinflata. In case of wild individuals, heteroxenous parasites (Cyrnea spp., Subulura spp., flukes or tapeworms) are the most predominant (Millán 2009). Therefore, one of the negative effects of releasing farm-reared birds is an eventual introduction and spread of diseases to wild red-legged partridge populations. In addition, hybridization with other partridge species represent a threat for the long-term survival of this native species (Villanúa et al. 2007; Jamieson and Lacy 2012; Sánchez-Donoso et al. 2012).
Environment and climatic conditions could influence the life cycle of parasite species, and so, their ecology, survival and spread, impacting also on the host populations (Morand 2015; Brunner and Eizaguirre 2016; Holand et al. 2019). In this sense, the Iberian Peninsula has different bioclimatic zones, being Mediterranean and Atlantic areas the main bioclimatic subdivision. Mediterranean climate covers territories with warm, dry summers and cool, wet winters, while the Atlantic area is wetter and colder (Rey Benayas and Scheiner 2002). This difference in climate defines the host (Sillero et al. 2009) and parasite diversity (Sanchis-Monsonís et al. 2019).
The aim of this study was to characterize the parasites of the gastrointestinal tract of red-legged partridges from several hunting estates distributed along the Iberian Peninsula, as well as to determine the influence of some biotic (sex and age of the host) and abiotic (geographical area of provenance) characteristics on the parasite community. In addition, the relationship between the characteristics of each climatic region and the parasite richness was discussed, as well as the risks related to the release of farm-reared partridges. Our results may help to design new management recommendations to preserve natural red-legged partridge populations.
Material & methods
Study area and animal collection
During the winters of 2010–2013, 934 red-legged partridges shot in 139 hunting estates from 15 out of the 50 Spanish provinces were collected. The hunting estates sampled regularly restocking with farm-raised red-legged partridges, although it was not possible to obtain detailed information about the frequency of these releases. At the time of sampling, it was not possible to differentiate whether the partridges were wild or farm-reared, because the latter were not ringed. The environmental heterogeneity of the Iberian Peninsula leads to great differences between the northern area and the Mediterranean one, which occupies most of the central, eastern and southern part of the country (Olson et al. 2001). In this sense, the area of study was classified as Humid Temperate Atlantic (average annual precipitation: 1000–1600 mm; average annual temperature: 7-12ºC), Subhumid Supramediterranean (600–1000 mm; 8-13ºC), Semiarid-Mesomediterranean (350–600 mm; 13-17ºC) and Thermomediterranean (200–350 mm; 17-19ºC) (Rivas-Martínez et al. 2017).
Red-legged partridges were categorized by sex and age following the descriptions of Sáenz de Buruaga et al. (1991). The distribution of the sample by sex, age and bioclimatic zone is shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1.
Table 1.
Distribution of red-legged partridges (n = 934) attending to the sex and age of the host, as well as climate area and province of origin
| Climate region(a) | Province | N(c) | Sex | Age category | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | NA(b) | Juvenile | Subadult | Adult | NA | |||
| HTA | Lugo | 63 | 11 | 36 | 16 | 0 | 3 | 44 | 16 |
| Álava | 40 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | |
| SS | Segovia | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Burgos | 49 | 1 | 3 | 45 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 45 | |
| Valladolid | 140 | 44 | 21 | 75 | 33 | 15 | 17 | 75 | |
| León | 53 | 8 | 5 | 40 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 40 | |
| SM | Toledo | 25 | 6 | 4 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 15 |
| Madrid | 87 | 11 | 13 | 63 | 10 | 2 | 12 | 63 | |
| Zamora | 91 | 56 | 35 | 0 | 22 | 15 | 54 | 0 | |
| Albacete | 70 | 27 | 24 | 19 | 21 | 0 | 30 | 19 | |
| Granada | 38 | 0 | 3 | 35 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 35 | |
| T | Murcia | 56 | 26 | 28 | 2 | 17 | 32 | 5 | 2 |
| Huelva | 81 | 0 | 0 | 81 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 81 | |
| Cádiz | 118 | 65 | 44 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 102 | 8 | |
| Sevilla | 17 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | |
| Total | 934 | 260 | 217 | 457 | 123 | 73 | 282 | 456 | |
(a) HTA Humid Temperate Atlantic, SS Subhumid Supramediterranean, SM Semiarid-Mesomediterranean, T Thermomediterranean
(b) NA: data not available
(c) N: number of red-legged partridges
Fig. 1.
Number of red-legged partridges collected and their distribution according to the province of provenance
The gastrointestinal tract (including proventriculus, gizzard, small intestine, caeca, colon and cloaca) of 547 birds, and only the large intestine and cloaca from the remaining partridges (n = 387) were extracted by the hunters, individually refrigerated in plastic labelled bags and submitted to the Department of Animal Health at Murcia University, where they were frozen at -20ºC until they were analysed, which was always less than two weeks after receipt of the samples.
Laboratory procedures
Coprological analysis
Of all submitted samples that contained feces in the cloaca (n = 927), coprological analysis was performed with both centrifugation-flotation and sedimentation techniques (MAFF 1986), using Sheather's solution (ρ = 1.27 g/ml) as flotation fluid. Two-chamber McMaster slides were filled in triplicate and the average oocyst/egg count per gram of faeces (OPG and EPG, respectively) was calculated. Oocysts and helminth eggs detected by coprology were morphometrically identified according to Soulsby (1987) and Naciri et al. (2011).
Necropsy
Once faecal samples were collected from the cloaca, the proventriculus, gizzard, small and large intestines of partridges from whom the gastrointestinal tract had been collected (n = 547), were longitudinally opened and directly examined under a stereomicroscope for the presence of helminths. When samples included the liver (40/547), this organ was cut into slices and washed with tap water over a filter to collect any trematodes that might be present. All isolated adult helminths were preserved in 70% ethanol until identification. Adult nematodes were cleared in lactophenol and morphometrically identified according to Yamaguti (1961) and Anderson et al. (1974). Tapeworms and trematodes were stained using Semichon´s carmine (Schmidt 1986), mounted in DPX and identified according to the descriptions given by Schmidt (1986) and Yamaguti (1971).
Statistical analysis
Prevalence (P) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), median abundance (MA) and median intensity (MI) with the range of detected parasites were determined according to Margolis et al. (1982) and Bush et al. (1997). Median abundance or median intensity data were calculated depending on whether all the sampled animals or only the positive ones were included in the statistical analysis, respectively. Species richness (number of parasite species in each host population) was also determined for the different climatic regions. Shapiro Wilks test was used to determine normality of parasite distributions. Fisher or Chi-square tests and the Kruskal–Wallis test were employed to compare the proportions of parasitised birds, and medians of intensity about parasite communities, respectively, according to host and environmental variables (sex, age category, bioclimatic zone). Additionally, analysis of multivariate abundance was carried out to evaluate the distribution of the parasite species in the different bioclimatic area (Wang et al. 2012). Only nematodes and trematodes were considered, as no data on cestode abundances were calculated, since in many cases the cestode fragments found lacked scolexes, so that the exact number of cestodes could not be calculated with certainty. Significant differences were considered for p < 0.05. R software 3.5.2 was used to analyse the data (R Core Team 2018).
Results
Parasites detected by coprological analysis and necropsy
The overall prevalence of infected hosts was 47.8% (446/934). The prevalence of parasites detected by coprological analysis was 44.8% (416/927). Eimeria spp. oocysts and helminth eggs shedding records are summarised in Table 2. The most prevalent parasitic forms were Eimeria spp. oocysts, followed by nematode eggs belonging to the Ascaridida and Trichurida (Capillaria-like) orders.
Table 2.
Prevalence (P), 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), median intensity (MI) and range (expressed as oocyst or eggs per gram of faeces) of parasites found by coprological analysis (n = 927)
| N | N + ve(a) | P (95%CI) | MI (range) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eimeria oocysts | 926 | 393 | 42.4 (39.2–45.6) | 1970 (10–627,642) |
| Nematode eggs | 927 | 46 | 4.9 (3.6–6.4) | 518 (1–20,980) |
| Cestode eggs | 570 | 3 | 0.53 (-0.07–1.12) | 1 (1–1) |
| Trematode eggs | 926 | 20 | 2.1 (1.2–3.1) | 79 (1–632) |
(a) N + ve: number of positive partridges
A total of 1623 helminths were collected by necropsy from 20.1% (110/547) of the red-legged partridges. Fifty-three of 547 (9.6%) partridges presented nematodes belonging to six different species and two genera, with MI (range) = 28.6 (1–239) nematodes and MA (range) = 2.7 (0–239) nematodes. Similarly, 60/547 (11%) partridges had cestodes and only 12 of the 40 individuals whose liver was available (30%) were parasitized by trematodes, with MI = 9 (1–44) and MA = 0.2 (0–44) trematodes per host. Regarding co-infections, 76.3% (84/110) of the parasitized partridges had only one helminth species, while multiparasitism with two, three and four different species was found in 19 (17.2%), 6 (5.4%) and one (0.9%) bird, respectively. The overall parasite richness found was at least 16 helminth species, considering that some parasite specimens could only be identified down to the genus level because of deterioration or because they were immature stages. All these results are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3.
Parasite prevalence (P), 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), median intensity (MI) and range of helminths isolated from red-legged partridges by necropsy
| N + ve(a) | P (95%CI) | MI (range) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nematodes (N = 547) | |||
| Ascaridia galli | 11 | 2 (0.83–3.19) | 7 (1–28) |
| Ascaridia compar | 7 | 1.2 (0.34- 2.22) | 15 (1–46) |
| Heterakis tenuicauda | 15 | 2.7 (1.37–4.11) | 8 (1–152) |
| Heterakis gallinarum | 8 | 1.4 (0.46–2.47) | 1.5 (1–19) |
| Trichostrongylus tenuis | 18 | 3.3 (1.79–4.78) | 7.5 (1–239) |
| Aonchotheca caudinflata | 2 | 0.36 (-1.14–1.87) | 82 (1–163) |
| Subulura spp. | 8 | 1.4 (0.46–2.47) | 5.5 (1–55) |
| Cyrnea spp. | 3 | 0.55 (-0.07–1.17) | 2 (1–3) |
| Cestodes (N = 537) | |||
| Raillietina spp. | 17 | 3.1 (1.68–4.65) | NA |
| Raillietina tetragona | 19 | 3.5 (1.97–5.10) | NA |
| Raillietina echinobotridia | 4 | 0.74 (0.02–1.47) | NA |
| Raillietina micracantha | 15 | 2.7 (1.40–4.19) | NA |
| Rhabdometra nigropunctata | 3 | 0.56 (-0.07–1.19) | NA |
| Choanotaenia infundibulum | 1 | 0.19 (-0.18–0.55) | NA |
| Trematodes (N = 40) | |||
| Dicrocoelium spp. | 1 | 2.5 (-2.34–7.34) | 1 (1–1) |
| Brachylaima spp. | 1 | 2.5 (-2.34–7.34) | 18 (18–18) |
| Brachylecithum spp. | 10 | 25 (11.58–38.42) | 4 (1–44) |
(a) N + ve: number of positive partridges
Biotic and abiotic risk factors
Although sex and age data were not always available, using the existing registries, the influence of different biotic (sex and age) and abiotic (bioclimatic zone of birds’ origin) on prevalence and intensity of parasites detected by coprological analysis and necropsy are summarised in Tables 4 and 5, respectively.
Table 4.
Influence of biotic and abiotic risk factors on prevalence and median of parasites found by coprological techniques
| Eimeria spp. | Nematode eggs | Cestode eggs | Trematode eggs | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Level | N(a) | Infected | P (95%CI) a | P (95%CI) | MI (range)(b) | P (95%CI) | MI (range) | P (95%CI) | MI (range) | P (95%CI) | MI (range) |
| Sex | Female | 217 | 106 |
49 (42.2–55.5) |
45 (38.1–51.3) |
1606 (26–627,642) |
6 (2.8–9.1) |
212 (1–1267) |
0.46 (-0.4–1.4) |
1 (1–1) |
3 (0.6–4.9) |
40 (1–632) |
| Male | 260 | 116 |
45 (38.6–50.6) |
42 (35.5–47.5) |
1605 (11–550,964) |
5 (2.1–7.2) |
564 (30–12,281) |
0.38 (-0.4–1.1) |
1 (1–1) |
4 (1.2–5.7) |
34 (1–193) |
|
| Age | Juvenile | 123 | 61 |
50 (40.7–58.4) |
50 (39.9–57.6) |
1459 (26–550,964) |
4 (0.6–7.5) |
949 (38–12,281) |
0.8 (-0.7–2.4) |
1 (1–1) |
2 (-0.6–3.9) |
108 (23–193) |
| Subadult | 73 | 28 |
38 (27.2–49.5) |
38 (25.9–48.1) |
1970 (61–392,733) |
3 (-1–6.5) |
200 (1–400) |
1.4 (-1.3–4) |
1 (1–1) |
8* (1.9–14.5) |
37 (17–632) |
|
| Adult | 282 | 134 |
47.5 (41.7–53.3) |
43 (36.4–47.9) |
1218 (11–627,642) |
6 (3.5–9.2) |
193 (50–5537) |
0.35 (-0.3–1) |
1 (1–1) |
3 (0.7–4.3) |
40 (1–167) |
|
| Climate region(c) | HTA | 103 | 37 |
36 (26.6–45.2) |
27 (18.6–35.8) |
2692 (42–442,550) |
11* (4.7–16.6) |
417 (20–2,020,983) |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SS | 248 | 84 |
34 (27.9–39.7) |
32 (26.1–37.6) |
2165 (10–550,964) |
3 (1–5.4) |
471 (1–8942) |
0 | 0 |
2 (0.3–3.8) |
165 (17–188) |
|
| SM | 311 | 123 |
39.5 (34.1–44.9) |
39 (33.8–44.6) |
657 (25–277,333) |
2 (0.4–3.4) |
558 (278–1111) |
0 | 0 |
1 (-0.1–2) |
1 (1–1) |
|
| T | 272 | 173 |
64* (57.9–69.3) |
61* (54.5–66.1) |
4416 (11–627,642)* |
8 (4.5–10.9) |
503 (21–12,281) |
1 (-0.1–2.3) |
1 (1–1) |
4* (2–6.8) |
113 (21–632) |
|
(a) N: Total number of partridges belonging to this variable level. Prevalence (P) and 95% confidence intervals
(b) MI (median intensity) and range (minimum and maximum values) of parasites in red-legged partridges
(c) HTA Humid Temperate Atlantic, SS Subhumid Supramediterranean, SM Semiarid-Mesomediterranean, T Thermomediterranean
(*) Significant differences between levels of the variable. Asterisk placed in level with highest value
Table 5.
Influence of biotic and abiotic risk factors on prevalence and median of parasites found in necropsies
| Nematodes(d) | Cestodes | Trematodes(e) | Ascaridida | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Level | N(a) | Infected | P (95%CI)(a) | P (95%CI) | MI (range)(b) | P (95%CI) | MI (range) | P (95%CI) | MI (range) | P (95%CI) | MI (range) |
| Sex | Female | 178 | 38 |
21 (15.3–27.4) |
10 (5.2–13.9) |
5 (1–46) |
14* (8.9–19.1) |
NA |
1 (-0.4–2.7) |
3 (1–5) |
6 (2.6–9.7) |
5 (1–46) |
| Male | 228 | 32 |
14 (9.5–18.5) |
9 (5.1–12.4) |
16 (1–59)* |
7 (3.7–10.3) |
NA |
1 (-0.2–2.8) |
18 (1–18) |
5 (2.4–8.2) |
22 (1–152) |
|
| Age | Juvenile | 101 | 16 |
16 (8.7–22.9) |
9 (3.3–14.7) |
2 (1–188) |
12 (5.6–18.2) |
NA | 0 | 0 |
7 (1.9–11.9) |
1 (1–25) |
| Subadult | 39 | 5 |
13 (2.3–23.3) |
3 (-2.4–7.5) |
1 (1–1) |
5 (-1.8–12) |
NA |
5 (-1.8–12) |
11.5 (5–18) |
0 | 0 | |
| Adult | 267 | 50 |
19 (14–23.4) |
10 (6.5–13.7) |
12 (1–152) |
11 (6.8–14.2) |
NA |
1 (-0.1–2.4) |
1 (1–18) |
6 (3.1–8.8) |
14 (1–152) |
|
| Climate region(c) | HTA | 46 | 7 |
15 (4.8–25.6) |
15 (4.8–25.6) |
9 (1–29) |
0 | NA | 0 | 0 |
13* (3.3–22.8) |
14 (1–29) |
| SS | 86 | 7 |
8 (2.4–13.9) |
3 (-0.4–7.4) |
55 (1–56) |
6 (0.9–10.7) |
NA | 0 | 0 |
2 (-0.8–5.5) |
28.5 (1–56) |
|
| SM | 243 | 29 |
12 (7.8–16) |
5 (1.9–7.1) |
7 (1–26) |
5 (1.9–7.1) |
NA |
4 (1.3–6) |
5 (1–44) |
3 (1–5.5) |
7.5 (1–22) |
|
| T | 172 | 63 |
37* (29.4–43.8) |
19* (12.8–24.4) |
10 (1–239) |
27* (19.1–32.1) |
NA |
2 (-0.2–3.7) |
1 (1–18) |
8 (4–12.2) |
9.5 (1–152) |
|
(a) N: Total number of partridges belonging to this variable level. Prevalence (P) and 95% confidence intervals
(b) Median intensity and range (minimum and maximum values) of parasites in red-legged partridges
(c) HTA Humid Temperate Atlantic, SS Subhumid Supramediterranean, SM Semiarid-Mesomediterranean, T Thermomediterranean
(d) Except Ascaridida
(e) These results were obtained from 40 individuals
(*) Significant differences between levels of the variable
Sub-adult partridges showed significantly higher prevalence of trematode eggs than the other age groups. Regarding helminth detection by necropsy, males presented higher intensity of nematodes than females, whereas cestode prevalence was, by contrast, significantly higher in females. Finally, regarding the bioclimatic zones, the prevalence of partridges with Eimeria spp. oocyst and median intensity of oocyst, as well as the prevalence of trematode eggs, cestodes and nematodes (except Ascaridida order), were significantly higher in the Thermomediterranean area. On the contrary, the prevalence of Ascaridida helminths found by necropsy, as well as Trichurida and Ascaridida eggs detected by coprological techniques, were significantly higher in the Humid Temperate Atlantic area (Tables 4 and 5), as is the case of A. galli abundances. Specifically, 46 birds were collected from this bioclimatic zone, and six of them had these nematodes, so prevalence is higher compared to that found in the Semiarid-Mesomediterranean area (8/243) or in the Thermomediterranean area (14/172). On the other side, regarding Thermomediterranean area, only T. tenuis abundances were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
In general terms, the mean abundance of nematodes and trematodes was statistically significant higher in southern areas (Semiarid-Mesomediterranean and Thermomediterranean areas) (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2). Likewise, the parasite richness was greater in the Semiarid-Mesomediterranean (13 species) and Thermomediterranean (15 species) regions, where the richness of nematodes represents around half of the species. The parasitic species found in all the areas, was Eimeria spp. as shown in Table 6.
Fig. 2.

Abundances of nematode and trematode species found in red-legged partridges according to the climatic region of origin
Table 6.
Red-legged partridge parasite richness according to climate region provenance
| Presence/absence(a) of species in each climate region(b) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parasite species | HTA | SS | SM | T | |
| Eimeria spp. | + | + | + | + | |
| Nematodes | A. galli | + | + | - | + |
| A. compar | + | + | + | + | |
| H. gallinarum | + | + | + | + | |
| H. tenuicauda | - | - | + | + | |
| T. tenuis | + | - | + | + | |
| A. caudinflata | - | - | + | + | |
| Cyrnea spp. | - | - | - | + | |
| Subulura spp. | - | + | + | + | |
| Richness | 4 | 4 | 6 | 8 | |
| Cestodes | R. tetragona | - | + | + | + |
| R. echinobotridia | - | + | + | + | |
| R. micracantha | - | + | + | + | |
| R. nigropunctata | - | + | + | - | |
| C. infundibulum | - | - | - | + | |
| Richness | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| Trematodes | Dicrocoelium spp. | - | - | - | + |
| Brachylaima spp. | - | - | + | - | |
| Brachylecithum spp. | - | - | + | + | |
| Richness | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Total species | 5 | 9 | 13 | 15 | |
(a) Presence ( +) and absence (-)
(b) HTA Humid Temperate Atlantic, SS Subhumid Supramediterranean, SM Semiarid-Mesomediterranean, T Thermomediterranean
Discussion
The results of this epidemiological investigation show a rich parasite community in Spanish red-legged populations, with most of the helminth species found having been previously described in this host. Considering the detection of parasites by coprological analysis and/or necropsy, the overall parasite prevalence found was 47.8%.
Focusing on the results obtained by coprological analysis, the overall prevalence was 44.8% (416/927), similar to the 38% previously described by Millán et al. (2003) in captive and wild red-legged partridges. Regarding the prevalence of helminths found by necropsy, it was 20.1% (110/547), a low value when compared to the prevalence of 69% (161/235) reported by Calvete et al. (2004) in red-legged partridges from two provinces of central Spain (Toledo and Ciudad Real), both with an important tradition of game bird hunting. These differences may be due to factors as the density of birds at the sampled site, land use characteristics as suggested by Calvete et al. (2004), or climatic features that influence on the survival of infective parasite stages and/or the distribution of their intermediate and paratenic hosts.
The prevalence of trematode infections was low when compared to the studies previously mentioned (Calvete et al. 2004). In our study, the most prevalent trematode detected by necropsy was Brachylecithum spp., a liver fluke that has been previously detected in red-legged partridges (Millán 2009). Dicrocoelium spp. was detected in only 2.5% of necropsied livers, while it was the most prevalent genus in hunted wild red-legged partridges studied by Millán et al. (2004a) and Calvete et al. (2003), who described prevalences of 46.8% and 17.3%, respectively. The low Dicrocoelium spp. prevalence that we found is probably due to the small number of livers available for our study. In addition, although we detected eggs of trematodes by coprological analysis, we are probably underestimating the prevalence of flukes, since the sensitivity of coprological techniques is lower than the detection of trematode specimens by necropsy, especially in the case of liver flukes (Sithithaworn et al. 1991; Sobral et al. 2019). The prevalence of Brachylaima spp. was 2.5%, similar to the findings described by Millán et al. (2004a), who considered these digestive flukes as anecdotal.
Among the helminths detected by necropsy, the prevalence of cestodes was the highest, especially in the case of the genus Railletina spp. (3.1%) and, in particular, to R. tetragona and R. micrachanta (3.5% and 2.7%, respectively). R. tetragona was also the most prevalent cestode in the study carried out by Calvete et al. (2003) and Millán et al. (2004a). Rhabdometra nigropunctata (4/538) and Choanotaenia infundibulum (1/538) prevalence was lower than 1%. These tapeworm species, as well as R. tetragona, were detected in wild red-legged partridges from the Iberian Peninsula in previous studies (Calvete et al. 2003; Millán et al. 2004a). Although the prevalence of adult tapeworms by necropsy was 11%, the prevalence of cestodes in partridges was much lower (1%) by coprological analysis, indicating a low diagnostic sensitivity of this last technique, as has been demonstrated by other authors (Zloch et al. 2021).
These results on trematode and cestode prevalence suggest that the parasitized partridges were either wild individuals or, alternatively, farm-reared birds released in the months prior to hunting that, during that time, acquired the infection in the wild (Villanúa et al. 2008). In this regard, it is noteworthy that 25–34% of the released red-legged partridges died during the first 72 h post-release and that, in general, survival rate is very low due to predation, hunting and starvation (Gortázar et al. 2000; Pérez et al. 2004).
Ascaridida was the most prevalent nematode group (7.5% of animals), including Heterakis spp. (4.2%) and Ascaridia spp. (3.3%), nematodes that have been described with low prevalences in red-legged partridges from Spain and Italy (Millán 2009; Polello et al. 2021).
Trichostrongylus tenuis was recovered from 3.3% of the red-legged partridges necropsied, while other studies have reported prevalences of 12–13% (Calvete et al. 2004; Millán et al. 2004a). It is a parasite that, despite having a direct life cycle, is considered more prevalent in wild than in farm-reared partridges, because it is unable to complete its life cycle when there is little vegetation in the environment, as happens in breeding farms (Millán et al. 2004a). In case of indirect life cycle nematodes as Aonchotheca caudinflata, Cyrnea spp. and Subulura spp., the prevalence detected was less than 1%. In other studies, similar values of prevalence from wild specimens have been reported: 1.8% (Calvete et al. 2003, 2004; Millan et al. 2004a). Hence, as noted above, these parasites could have been acquired by wild individuals or partridges that had lived in the wild during the first periods of life.
Ecological determinants and anthropogenic factors, such as the type of management implemented, influence the prevalence, intensity and parasite richness in game species (Tompkins et al. 1999; Poulin 2007; González-Quevedo et al. 2014; Morand 2015; Fanelli et al. 2020). In our study, we have included red-legged partridges from 15 provinces, ranging from the north to the south of the Iberian Peninsula, so it can be assumed that the greater heterogeneity of the bioclimatic regions sampled, each with its own characteristics of land use and management of the species, has influenced our results.
Eimeria spp. was the most prevalent parasite in this study, as in previous surveys with other Galliformes species (Santilli and Bagliacca 2012; Globokar et al. 2017; Polello et al. 2021). Eimeria spp. and Ascaridida parasites are frequently found in farm-reared partridge populations (Bolognesi et al. 2006; Villanúa et al. 2008; Millán 2009; Naciri et al. 2011; Máca and Pavlásek 2020). In other game birds, such as pheasants, individuals from restocking areas have been found to have twice the prevalence of Eimeria spp. as those from non-repopulated areas, 51.3% and 25.6%, respectively (Santilli and Bagliacca 2012). In agreement, Mani et al. (2000) pointed out that wild pheasant had lower parasite prevalence than those hunted in areas where farm-reared birds are frequently released. In fact, coccidiosis is one of the main problems in partridge farms, where the characteristics of the facilities provide conditions that help to spread infection (Naciri et al. 2011). On the other hand, Albendazole is usually administered in red-legged partridge farms to limit the infection with nematodes, mainly Trichurida and Ascaridida, although results reported by Villanúa et al. (2008) have demonstrated the limited efficacy of this drug, in particular with regard to Heterakis spp. This scenario coincides with our results since Eimeria spp. was the most prevalent genus detected with coprological techniques, whereas Ascaridia spp. and Heterakis spp. were the most prevalent helminths detected by necropsy. Moreover, according to the bioclimatic zone of partridge’s origin, our results indicate that those birds coming from the Thermomediterranean area showed higher prevalence of Eimeria spp. (60.3%; 164/272) and higher number of oocysts shedding (considered as a proxy of median parasite intensity) than partridges from other bioclimatic zones. These results could be the consequence of more frequent restocking with farm-reared birds in hunting estates from the Thermomediterranean area. Hunting is an important tradition in Spain, being especially significant in centre and south areas (Viñuela et al. 2013). In fact, game crops are used as a tool to provide supplementary food, nesting cover or protection for game birds in Mediterranean areas, characterized by dry and hot summers (Reino et al. 2016). Due to the climatic characteristics of the Iberian Peninsula, annual periods of drought are common and, in order to palliate this, the set-up of water points in hunting areas is also a frequently used management measure (Gaudioso Lacasa et al. 2010). These types of practices, which has been widely applied for decades in the game management of partridges, leads to the establishment of hot spots for pathogen transmission, mostly in water stress periods. In this sense, Gaudioso Lacasa et al. (2010) observed that water points were used by both wild and game birds, especially in summer, when chicks need more requirements. As with supplementary feeding, these management measures promote parasite transmission and disease outbreaks due to higher contact among birds (Villanúa et al. 2006; Millán 2009). Therefore, both the frequent release of farm-reared partridges in Southern areas of Spain to cover the needs of the hunters, and the management practices used in these hunting estates, could determine the high Eimeria spp. prevalence and the highest presence of Ascaridida among all the helminths found in partridges coming from these areas.
Regarding biotic factors, cestode prevalence was significantly higher in female partridges, whilst the median intensity of nematodes was greater in males. On the other hand, sub-adult partridges showed a significantly higher prevalence of trematode eggs in faeces. Other studies have shown differences in parasite intensity and prevalence depending on the sex and the age of the host in a broad range of species (Poulin 2007; Martínez-Guijosa et al. 2015). Several reasons could account for gender-related differences in parasite infections. For instance, testosterone production in males is energy demanding and has been linked to immunosupression and increased probability of becoming parasitized (Klein 2004; Guerra-Silveira and Abad-Franch 2013). Other studies attributed differences in the risk of parasite infection between males and females to food preferences (Provencher et al. 2016). Immunosuppression and food preferences have also been associated to age-related differences in the prevalence of parasite infections (Thieltges et al. 2006).
Finally, considering parasite richness, a total of 16 species of helminths were described by necropsy in this study. These included eight species of nematodes, five of cestodes and three of trematodes (Table 3). The Thermomediterranean area was the one with highest richness of parasite species (15), followed by the Semiarid-Mesomediterranean (14), the Supramediterranean (8), and finally the Humid Temperate Atlantic area (4), which had the lower richness (Table 6). Brown (1984) suggested that abundance and distribution of helminths reflect the abundance and distribution of their hosts, and Calvete et al. (2003) propose that the distribution of parasites, in general, is related to the distribution of their intermediate and definitive hosts. In this sense, socio-economic interest around game birds in the southern Iberian Peninsula, where release of farm-reared partridges as well as management practices (use of game crops or water points) are more frequent than in other territories, could explain the results obtained about Eimeria spp. or Ascaridida infections in the Thermomediterranean area, as well as the higher values of the abundance of T. tenuis comparing with the other bioclimatic areas.
Moreover, the environmental characteristics of each area may also cause the parasite richness between areas to differ. In fact, results about multivariate abundance indicate statistically significant differences among bioclimatic zones, with Semiarid-Mesomediterranean and Thermomediterranean areas showing the highest rates of trematodes and nematodes, respectively. In this sense, the presence of indirect life cycle parasites and the high rate of parasite richness reached in these areas, could be due to the influence of environmental factors in this bioclimatic zone on parasites using intermediate and paratenic hosts in their life cycles (Krasnov and Poulin 2010; Morand 2015).
Climate has been related to the environmental persistence of parasite free stages, and also determines the abundance and distribution of intermediate and paratenic hosts (Holand et al. 2019). Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera and other invertebrate parasite hosts constitute an important part of the partridge`s diet (Holland et al. 2006); in particular, dung beetles play an important role in parasite transmission (Nichols and Gómez 2014). Those belonging to the Aphodiia, Scarabaeidae or Geotrupidae families are present in Iberian Peninsula, and the latter two families comprise dung species that are well adapted to arid environments (Verdú and Galante 2002; Cabrero-Sañudo and Lobo 2003). Additionally, dry lands or calcareous soils typical in Mediterranean ecosystems are favourable for terrestrial snails or ants acting as intermediate host of trematodes (Manga-González et al. 2001; Otranto and Traversa 2003). In fact, fluke species are only present in Semiarid-Mesomediterranean and Thermomediterranean areas. In addition, the environmental characteristics of the Humid Temperate Atlantic area provide adequate requirements for earthworms’ development (Edwards and Lofty 1977), which are intermediate or paratenic hosts for Trichurida and Ascaridida nematodes, respectively (Fedynich 2008; Yabsley 2008). Therefore, the presence of earthworms could be helping the maintenance of these parasites in Humid Temperate Atlantic areas.
Conclusions
Our study provides an account of the prevalence, richness, abundance and intensity of parasite infections in red-legged partridges in the main bioclimatic territories in the Iberian Peninsula. This novel information about the geographic distribution of digestive parasites in this game species is necessary to evaluate, in a comprehensive manner, the health status of the Iberian populations. In this way, a deeper knowledge of the distribution and prevalence of these parasites (some of which potentially cause of a negative impact on partridges), is the necessary basis to design management practices that limit the spread of these pathogens and, consequently, to ensure the long-term sustainability of red-legged partridge. Special emphasis should be placed on controlling parasite infections in farm-reared partridges prior to restocking hunting estates, as well as avoiding parasite concentration in areas where supplementary feeding is provided following their introduction.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Fundación para el Estudio y Defensa de la Naturaleza y la Caza (FEDENCA), Spain.
Authors' contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by IAH, CMC and MRRY. The first draft of the manuscript was written by IAH. CMC and MRRY revised the manuscript, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Authors have permission to participate.
Consent for publication
Authors have permission for publication.
Conflict of interest
None.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- Anderson RC, Chabaud AG, Willmott S (1974) CIH Keys to the nematode parasites of vertebrates. Common Health Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, Bucks, England, UK
- Arroyo B, Delibes-Mateos M, Díaz-Fernández S, Viñuela J. Hunting management in relation to profitability aims: red-legged partridge hunting in central Spain. Eur J Wildlife Res. 2012;58(5):847–855. [Google Scholar]
- Arroyo B, Caro J, Muñoz-Adalla EJ, Díaz-Fernández S, Delibes-Mateos M, Díaz-Fernández M, Viñuela J. Reconciling economic and ecological sustainability: can non-intensive hunting of red-legged partridges be economically profitable? Eur J Wildl Res. 2017;63:14. [Google Scholar]
- Birdlife International (2022) Alectoris rufa. Species factsheet: Alectoris rufa. http://www.birdlife.org. Accessed 1 May 2022
- Blanco-Aguiar JA, Virgós E, Villafuerte R. Perdiz roja (Alectoris rufa) In: Martí R, Del Moral JC, editors. Atlas de las aves reproductoras de España. Madrid: Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza y Sociedad Española de Ornitología; 2003. pp. 212–213. [Google Scholar]
- Blanco-Aguiar JA, Virgós E, Villafuerte R. La perdiz roja (Alectoris rufa) In: Madroño A, González C, Atienza JC, editors. Libro Rojo de las Aves de España. Madrid: Dirección General para la Biodiversidad-SEO/Birdlife; 2004. pp. 182–185. [Google Scholar]
- Blanco-Aguiar JA, González-Jara P, Ferrero ME, Sánchez-Barbudo I, Virgós E, Villafuerte R, Dávila JA. Assessment of game restocking contributions to anthropogenic hybridization: the case of the Iberian red-legged partridge. Anim Conserv. 2008;11:535–545. [Google Scholar]
- Bolognesi PG, Galuppi R, Catelli E, Cecchinato M, Frasnelli M, Raffini E, Marzadori F, Tampieri MP. Outbreak of Eimeria kofoidi and E. legionensis coccidiosis in red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa) Italian J Animal Sci. 2006;5(3):318–320. [Google Scholar]
- Brown JH. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am Nat. 1984;124(2):255–279. [Google Scholar]
- Brunner FS, Eizaguirre C. Can environmental change affect host/parasite-mediated speciation? Zoology (Jena) 2016;119(4):384–394. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2016.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buenestado FJ, Ferreras P, Delibes-Mateos M, Tortosa P, Blanco-Aguiar JA, Villafuerte R. Habitat selection and home range size of red-legged partridges in Spain. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2008;126(3–4):158–162. [Google Scholar]
- Buenestado FJ, Ferreras P, Blanco-Aguiar JA, Sánchez-Tortosa F, Villafuerte R. Survival and causes of mortality among wild red-legged partridges Alectoris rufa in Southern Spain: implications for conservation. IBIS. 2009;151(4):720–730. [Google Scholar]
- Bush AO, Lafferty D, Lotz JM, Shostak AW. Parasitology meets ecology on own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. J Parasitol. 1997;83(4):575–583. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cabodevilla X, Estrada A, Mougeot F, Jimenez J, Arroyo B. Farmland composition and farming practices explain spatio-temporal variations in red-legged partridge density in central Spain. Sci Total Environ. 2021;799:149406. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cabrero-Sañudo FJ, Lobo JM. Reconocimiento de los factores determinantes de la riqueza de especies: el caso de los Aphodiinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea, Aphodiidae) en la Península Ibérica. Graellsia. 2003;59(2–3):155–177. [Google Scholar]
- Calvete C, Estrada R, Lucientes J, Telletxeta EA, I, Correlates of helminth community in the red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa) in Spain. J Parasitol. 2003;89(3):445–451. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2003)089[0445:COHCIT]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calvete C, Blanco-Aguiar JA, Virgós E, Cabezas-Díaz S, Villafuerte R. Spatial variation in helminth community structure in the red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa L.): effects of definitive host density. Parasitology. 2004;129:101–113. doi: 10.1017/s0031182004005165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Casas F, Viñuela J. Agricultural practices or game management: which is the key to improve red-legged partridge nesting success in agricultural landscapes? Environ Conserv. 2010;37(2):177–186. [Google Scholar]
- Casas F, Arroyo B, Viñuela J, Guzmán JL, Mougeot F. Are farm-reared red-legged partridge releases increasing hunting pressure on wild breeding partridges in central Spain? Eur J Wildl Res. 2016;62(1):79–84. [Google Scholar]
- Delibes-Mateos M, Farfán MA, Olivero J, Vargas JM. Impact of land-use changes on red-legged partridge conservation in the Iberian Peninsula. Environ Conserv. 2012;39(4):337–346. [Google Scholar]
- Díaz-Fernández S, Arroyo B, Casas F, Martínez-Haro M, Viñuela J (2013) Effect of game management on wild red-legged partridge abundance. PLoS One 8(6):e66671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Edwards CA, Lofty JR. Earthworms as pests and benefactors. In: Edwards CA, Lofty JR, editors. Biology of Earthworms. 2. Boston: Springer; 1977. pp. 222–230. [Google Scholar]
- Fanelli A, Menardi G, ChiodoM Giordano O, Ficetto G, Bessone M, Lasagna A, Carpignano MG, Molinar Min A, Gugiatti A, Meneguz PG, Tizzani P. Gastroenteric parasite of wild Galliformes in the Italian Alps: implication for conservation management. Parasitology. 2020;147(4):471–477. doi: 10.1017/S003118201900177X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fedynich AM (2008). Heterakis and Ascaridia. In Atkinson CT, Thomas NJ, Bruce Hunter D. (ed). Parasitic diseases of wild birds, Wiley-Blackwell, Ames, Iowa, pp: 388–412
- Gaudioso Lacasa VR, Sánchez García-Abad C, Prieto Martín R, Bartolomé Rodríguez DJ, Pérez Garrido JA, Alonso de La Varga ME. Small game water troughs in a Spanish agrarian pseudo steppe: visits and water site choice by wild fauna. Eur J Wildlife Res. 2010;56(4):591–599. [Google Scholar]
- Globokar M, Fischer D, Pantchev N. Occurrence of endoparasites in captive birds between 2005 to 2011 as determined by faecal flotation and review of literature. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2017;130(11–12):461–473. [Google Scholar]
- González-Quevedo C, Davies RG, Richardson DS. Predictors of malaria infection in a wild bird population: landscape-level analyses reveal climatic and anthropogenic factors. J Anim Ecol. 2014;83(5):1091–1102. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gortázar C, Villafuerte R, Martín M. Success of traditional restocking of red-legged partridge for hunting purposes in areas of low density of northeast Spain Aragón. Z Jagdwiss. 2000;46:23–30. [Google Scholar]
- Guerra-Silveira F, Abad-Franch F. Sex bias in infectious disease epidemiology: patterns and processes. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e62390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holland JM, Hutchison MAS, Smith B, Aebischer NJ. A review of invertebrates and seed-bearing plants as food for farmland birds in Europe. Ann Appl Biol. 2006;148(1):49–71. [Google Scholar]
- Holand H, Jensen H, Kvalnes T, Tufto J, Pärn H, Sæther BE, Ringsby TH. Parasite prevalence increases with temperature in an avian metapopulation in northern Norway. Parasitology. 2019;46(8):1030–1035. doi: 10.1017/S0031182019000337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jamieson IG, Lacy RC. Managing genetic issues in reintroduction biology. In: Ewen JG, Armstrong DP, Parker KA, Seddon PJ, editors. Reintroduction biology: integrating science and management. Hoboken: Wiley; 2012. pp. 441–475. [Google Scholar]
- Klein SL. Hormonal and immunological mechanisms mediating sex differences in parasite infection. Parasite Immunol. 2004;26(6–7):247–264. doi: 10.1111/j.0141-9838.2004.00710.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krasnov BR, Poulin R. Ecological properties of a parasite: species specific stability and geographical variation. In: Morand S, Krasnov BR, editors. The Biogeography of Host-Parasite Interactions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. pp. 99–114. [Google Scholar]
- Máca O, Pavlásek I. Protozoan and helminth infections of aviary-reared Alectoris rufa (Galliformes: Phasianidae) before releasing for hunting in the Czech Republic: infection dynamics and potential risks. J Parasitol. 2020;106(4):439–443. doi: 10.1645/17-129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MAFF (1986) Manual of Veterinary Parasitological Laboratory Techniques. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, HMSO, London
- Manga-González MY, González-Lanza C, Cabanas E, Campo R. Contributions to and review of dicrocoeliosis, with special reference to the intermediate hosts of Dicrocoelium dendriticum. Parasitology. 2001;123:S91–S114. doi: 10.1017/s0031182001008204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mani P, Perrucci S, Bennati L, Bagliacca M, Santilli F, Mazzoni DS, Rossi G. Parasitological control of wild pheasants in managed areas of Siena province. Ann Fac Med Vet Univ Pisa. 2000;53:35–42. [Google Scholar]
- Margolis L, Esch GW, Holmes JC, Kuris AM, Schad AG. The use of ecological terms in parasitology (Report of an ad hoc committee of the American Society of Parasitologists) J Parasitol. 1982;68(1):131–133. [Google Scholar]
- Martínez-Guijosa J, Martínez-Carrasco C, López-Olvera JR, Fernández-Aguilar X, Colom-Cadena A, Cabezón O, Mentaberre G, Ferrer D, Velarde R, Gassó D, Garel M, Rossi L, Lavín S, Serrano E. Male-biased gastrointestinal parasitism in a nearly monomorphic mountain ungulate. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:165. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0774-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Millán J, Gortázar C, Buenestado FJ, Rodríguez P, Tortosa FS, Villafuerte R. Effects of a fiber-rich diet on physiology and survival of farm-reared red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa) Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2003;134(1):85–91. doi: 10.1016/s1095-6433(02)00189-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Millán J, Gortázar C, Villafuerte R. A comparison of the helminth faunas of wild and farm-reared red-legged partridges. J Wildl Manag. 2004;68(3):701–707. [Google Scholar]
- Millán J, Gortázar C, Martín-Mateo MP, Villafuerte R. Comparative survey of the ectoparasite fauna of wild and farm-reared red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa), with an ecological study in wild populations. Parasitol Res. 2004;93(1):79–85. doi: 10.1007/s00436-004-1113-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Millán J. Diseases of the red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa L.): a review. Wildl Biol Pract. 2009;5(1):70–88. [Google Scholar]
- Morand S. (macro-) Evolutionary ecology of parasite diversity: From determinants of parasite species richness to host diversification. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2015;4(1):80–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naciri M, Repérant JM, Fort G, Crespin J, Duperray J, Benzoni G. Eimeria involved in a case of coccidiosis in farmed red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa) in France: oocyst isolation and gross lesion description after experimental infection. Avian Pathol. 2011;40(5):515–524. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2011.606798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nichols E, Gómez A. Dung beetles and fecal helminth transmission: patterns, mechanisms and questions. Parasitology. 2014;141(5):614–623. doi: 10.1017/S0031182013002011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GVN, Underwood EC, D’amico JA, Itoua I, Strand HE, Morrison JC, Loucks CJ, Allnutt TF, Ricketts TH, Kura Y, Lamoreux JF, Wettengel WW, Hedao P, Kassem KR. Terrestrial Ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. Bioscience. 2001;51(11):933–938. [Google Scholar]
- Otranto D, Traversa D. Dicrocoeliosis of ruminants: a little known fluke disease. Trends Parasitol. 2003;19(1):12–15. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(02)00009-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pérez JA, Alonso ME, Gaudioso VR, Olmedo JA, Díez C, Bartolomé D. Use of radiotracking techniques to study a summer repopulation with red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa) chicks. Poult Sci. 2004;83(6):882–888. doi: 10.1093/ps/83.6.882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Polello L, Molinar Min AR, Fanelli A, Negri E, Peano A, Meneguz PG, Tizzani P. First data on gastrointestinal parasitic infection in the red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa) in Italy. Diversity. 2021;13:287. [Google Scholar]
- Poulin R. Evolutionary Ecology of Parasites. 2. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Provencher JF, Gilchrist HG, Mallory ML, Mitchell GW, Forbes MR. Direct and indirect causes of sex differences in mercury concentrations and parasitic infections in a marine bird. Sci Total Environ. 2016;551–552:506–512. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
- Reino L, Borralho R, Arroyo B. Influence of game crops on the distribution and productivity of red-legged partridges Alectoris rufa in Mediterranean woodlands. Eur J Wildl Res. 2016;62:609–617. [Google Scholar]
- Rey Benayas MJ, Scheiner SM. Plant diversity, biogeography and environment in Iberia: patterns and possible causal factors. J Veg Sci. 2002;13(2):245–258. [Google Scholar]
- Rivas-Martínez S, Penas Á, del Río S, Díaz González TE, Rivas-Sáenz S (2017) Bioclimatology of the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands. In Loidi J (ed) The Vegetation of the Iberian Peninsula. Plant and Vegetation, vol 12. Springer, Cham, Netherlands, 29–80
- Sánchez-Donoso I, Vilà C, Puigcerver M, Butkauskas D, De la Calle JRC, Morales-Rodríguez PA, Rodríguez-Teijeiro JD. Are farm-reared quails for game restocking really common quails (Coturnix coturnix)?: a genetic approach. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(6):e39031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez García-Abad C, Alonso de la Varga ME, Prieto Martín R, González Eguren V, Gaudioso Lacasa VR. Una visión sobre la avicultura para la producción de caza en España. ITEA. 2009;105(3):169–183. [Google Scholar]
- Sanchis-Monsonís G, Fanelli A, Tizzani P, Martínez-Carrasco C. First epidemiological data on Spirocerca vulpis in the red fox: a parasite of clustered geographical distribution. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2019;18:100338. doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2019.100338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santilli F, Bagliacca M. Occurrence of eggs and oocysts of intestinal parasites of pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) in droppings collected in differently managed protected areas of Tuscany (Italy) Eur J Wildl Res. 2012;58:369–372. [Google Scholar]
- Sáenz De Buruaga M, Lucio AJ, Purroy J (1991) Reconocimiento de sexo y edad en especies cinegéticas. Diputación Foral de Álava, Vitoria
- Schmidt GD. Handbook of tapeworm identification. Boca Ratón, Florida: CRC Press Inc.; 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Sillero N, Brito JC, Skidmore AK, Toxopeus AG. Biogeographical patterns derived from remote sensing variables: the amphibians and reptiles of the Iberian Peninsula. Amphibia-Reptilia. 2009;30(2):185–206. [Google Scholar]
- Sithithaworn P, Tesana S, Pipitgool V, Kaewkes S, Pairojkul C, Sripa B, Paupairoj A, Thaiklar K. Relationship between faecal egg count and worm burden of Opisthorchis viverrini in human autopsy cases. Parasitology. 1991;102(2):277–281. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000062594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sobral M, Sousa S, Ribeiro T, Galvão SR, Santos RM, Silva R, Reis TS, Dias F, Santos HD. Infection by Platynosomum illiciens (= P. fastosum) in domestic cats of Araguaína, Tocantins, northern Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2019;28(4):786–789. doi: 10.1590/S1984-29612019070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soulsby EJL (1987) Parasitología y enfermedades parasitarias en los animales domésticos. 7th edn. Nueva Editorial Interamericana, México D.F.
- Thieltges DW, Hussel B, Baekgaard H. Endoparasites in common eiders Somateria mollissima from birds killed by an oil spill in the northern Wadden Sea. J Sea Res. 2006;55(4):301–308. [Google Scholar]
- Tompkins DM, Dickson G, Hudson PJ. Parasite-mediated competition between pheasant and grey partridge: a preliminary investigation. Oecologia. 1999;119(3):378–382. doi: 10.1007/s004420050798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verdú JR, Galante E. Climatic stress, food availability and human activity as determinants of endemism patterns in the Mediterranean region: the case of dung beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea) in the Iberian Peninsula. Divers Distrib. 2002;8(5):259–274. [Google Scholar]
- Viñuela J, Casas F, Díaz-Fernández S, Delibes-Mateos M, Mougeot F, Arroyo B. The red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa) in Spain: a threatened game species. Ecosistemas. 2013;22(2):6–12. [Google Scholar]
- Villanúa D, Hofle U, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Gortázar G. Trichomonas gallinae in wintering common wood pigeons Columba palumbus in Spain. Ibis. 2006;148(4):641–648. [Google Scholar]
- Villanúa D, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Rodríguez O, Viñuela J, Gortázar C. How effective is pre-release nematode control in farm-reared red-legged partridges Alectoris rufa? J Helminthol. 2007;81(1):101–103. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X07251211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Villanúa D, Pérez-López L, Casas F, Alzaga V, Acevedo P, Viñuela J, Gortázar C. Sanitary risks of red-legged partridge releases: introduction of parasites. Eur J Wildl Res. 2008;54:199–204. [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y, Naumann U, Wright ST, Warton DI. Mvabund - an R package for model-based analysis of multivariate abundance data. Methods Ecol Evol. 2012;3:471–474. [Google Scholar]
- Yamaguti S. Nematodes of birds. In: Yamaguti S, editor. System Helminthum. New York: Interscience publishers INC; 1961. pp. 183–349. [Google Scholar]
- Yamaguti S (1971) Synopsis of the Digenetic Trematodes of Vertebrates. Keigaku Publishing Co., Vols I & II, Tokio
- Yabsley MJ. Capillarid nematodes. In: Atkinson CT, Thomas NJ, Bruce Hunter D, editors. Parasitic Diseases of Wild Birds. Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell, Ames; 2008. pp. 463–497. [Google Scholar]
- Zloch A, Kuchling S, Hess M, Hess C. In addition to birds' age and outdoor access, the detection method is of high importance to determine the prevalence of gastrointestinal helminths in laying hens kept in alternative husbandry systems. Vet Parasitol. 2021;299:109559. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

