Skip to main content
Frontiers in Medicine logoLink to Frontiers in Medicine
. 2022 Nov 10;9:1009578. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1009578

A community-oriented survey on the association between androgenetic alopecia and metabolic syndrome in Chinese people

Hongliu Zhu 1,, Haijian Guo 2,, Yihong Gao 1,*, Yuegang Wei 3, Tao Mao 4, Jianqiu Yang 1
PMCID: PMC9684335  PMID: 36438037

Abstract

Background

Several studies on Caucasians have revealed a positive relationship between androgenetic alopecia (AGA) and metabolic syndrome (MS). However, this correlation varies in different contexts. Currently, the association of AGA with MS is yet to be studied and elucidated in Chinese people.

Objective

To evaluate the association between AGA and MS in the Chinese population.

Methods

This study included information on components of MS along with other possible risk factors in a total of 3,703 subjects. The patients’ loss of hair was assessed using Hamilton-Norwood and Ludwig classification method.

Results

In this study, 29.88% of male and 27.58% of female AGA patients were diagnosed with MS, while the rest were regarded as controls (29.95% of male and 27.89% of female control subjects) (P > 0.05). The AGA males presented significantly higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure than the male control subjects (SP: P = 0.000; DP: P = 0.041). Among females with AGA, waist circumference, hip circumference, and waist-hip ratio elevated the loss of hair compared to that of the female controls (P = 0.000, P = 0.020, P = 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

Our study indicated no direct association between AGA and MS in Chinese people. However, a close relationship was observed between AGA and systolic blood pressure.

Keywords: androgenetic alopecia, metabolic syndrome, systolic blood pressure, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus

Introduction

Androgenetic alopecia (AGA), also known as male pattern baldness, is a type of hair loss commonly prevailing in males. According to statistics, about 60–70% of the population is affected by AGA globally (1), affecting 21.6% of Chinese males and 6.0% of Chinese females adults (2). Epidemiological studies have revealed a positive association between AGA and metabolic syndrome (MS), with some studies labeling AGA as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and MS (3). However, this correlation has been denied by some reports (4).

Contrastingly, most of the previous studies have established the relationship between AGA and MS in Caucasian subjects. However, evidence elucidating the correlation between AGA and MS in Chinese people remains insufficient.

Therefore, our study compared the presence of MS components in both male and female AGA patients with control subjects in a Chinese population.

Participants and methods

Participants

A population-oriented, cross-sectional study was implemented between July and September 2020. This study was based on a multistage, stratified sampling method and was initiated in Yandu and Jurong, two cities of Jiangsu Province. Next, two or three districts/towns were randomly chosen from these two cities separately. Of these, we randomly picked out eight neighborhoods/villages as the subjects. The eligibility of the study included people aged >18 years without any conditions of mental disorders, along with pregnant and lactating women. Our study enrolled a total of 3,703 participants, including 1,414 men and 2,289 women.

Measurements

Figure 1 depicts the flow chart of the study process. Before beginning the screening process, all participants were asked to fast overnight for at least 8 h, and the first blood sample was drawn after confirming their identity. Next, a 75-g OGTT was performed, and the second blood sample was drawn after 2 h. During the next 2 h, participants were measured for general non-laboratory parameters, including weight and height, waist and hip circumference, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The demographic information, lifestyle factors, and history of diseases were obtained using a structured questionnaire. In the same central laboratory (Adicon, Nanjing), venous blood sample tests were conducted using the same method. The third fingertip of the non-dominant hand was cleaned using 75% ethyl alcohol, and the skin was punctured immediately after drying. Subsequently, a second blood droplet was obtained by firmly squeezing the tested finger. AGA was diagnosed based on clinical findings and family history.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Flowchart of the study process.

Diagnostic criteria

The definition of MS was based on the criteria defined by the Diabetes Branch of the Chinese Medical Association. Subjects were required to have three or more of the following criteria: (i) BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2; (ii) fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels ≥ 6.1 mmol/L and/or 2 h plasma glucose (2 h PG) ≥ 7.8 mmol/L, and/or treated diabetes; (iii) BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg and/or treated hypertension; (iv) serum TG ≥ 1.70 mmol/L and/or HDL-c <0.9 mmol/L. BMI was calculated by dividing weight (kg) by height (m2). A value of 18.5 ≤ BMI < 24.0 was considered normal, 24.0 ≤ BMI < 28.0 was overweight, and BMI ≥ 28.0 was obese. Similarly, the waist-hip ratio was calculated by dividing the waist circumference by the hip circumference (cm). Central obesity was considered if waist circumference was >90 cm in men and >85 cm in women. Hyperuricemia (HUA) was defined if serum uric acid (UA) levels were >420 μmol/L in male subjects and > 360 μmol/L in females.

Androgenetic alopecia was diagnosed based on family history and clinical findings, which included increased hair thinning pattern on the frontal/parietal scalp, with male patients showing greater hair density in the occipital region while female patients showed retention of the frontal hairline and also the presence of miniaturized hair. The hair loss assessment was performed by two dermatologists. The severity of AGA was determined using the Hamilton-Norwood scale for male and Ludwig scale for female patients.

Exclusion criteria included other types of alopecia, patients who received hormone replacement therapy using testosterone, the presence of hyperaldosteronism, and a known cause of hyperandrogenism.

Statistical analysis

Epidata 3.1 dual computer was used to input all data, while SPSS 17.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Data were described using incidence, mean ± standard deviation, ANOVA, Chi-square test, and other methods. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Furthermore, a logistic regression model was employed to assess the associations between each possible risk factor (BMI, waist circumference, WHR, fasting plasma glucose, BP, and serum level of lipids) and the risk of AGA.

Ethical statement

This study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Jiangsu Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (JSJK2016-B003-03) and Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University. Also, each participant provided written informed consent.

Results

We investigated 1,414 men, aged between 21 and 79 years, with an average age of 55.91 ± 8.91 years, and 2,289 women, aged between 22 and 85 years, with an average age of 54.95 ± 8.43 years. Age, BMI, central obesity, hypertension, pathoglycemia, dyslipidemia, and MS are summarized in Table 1. Among males, 646 subjects (45.72%) were diagnosed with AGA, and based on the Hamilton-Norwood scale, 10.22% belonged to stage I, 31.42% to stage II, 19.97% to stage III, 13.62% to stage IV, 11.30% to stage V, 7.28% to stage VI, and 6.19% to stage VII AGA. Of all female participants, 116 (5.05%) were diagnosed with AGA. Of these, 33.62% were in stage I, 52.59% in stage II, and 13.79% in stage III based on the Ludwig scale.

TABLE 1.

Demographic characteristics of the subjects.

Males (1,414) Females (2,289)


Cases Proportion (%) Cases Proportion (%)
Age
<25 3 0.21 2 0.09
25–34 40 2.83 64 2.80
35–44 111 7.85 169 7.38
45–54 401 28.36 779 34.03
55–64 581 41.08 955 41.72
>65 278 19.66 320 14.00
BMI
24.0 ≤ BMI < 28.0 602 42.57 922 40.28
BMI ≥ 28.0 300 21.22 420 18.35
Central obesity 540 38.19 865 37.79
Hypertension 661 46.75 1,117 48.80
Pathoglycemia
Prediabetes 134 9.48 198 8.65
Diabetes 261 18.46 340 14.85
Dyslipidemia
Total cholesterol 46 3.25 109 4.76
Triglyceride 276 19.52 367 16.03
HDL-c 108 7.64 56 2.45
LDL-c 16 1.13 34 1.49
MS 423 29.91 638 27.87
Hyperuricemia 308 21.78 74 3.23
AGA 646 45.72 116 5.05

Prediabetes: fasting blood glucose ≥ 6.1 mmol/L but <7.0 mmol/L, or 2 h PG ≥7.8 mmol/L but <11.1 mmol/L.

The control group consisted of non-AGA subjects (768 males and 2,173 females). Statistically significant differences were observed in the mean age between both groups (P = 0.000, Table 2). Moreover, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly higher in males with AGA than those in the control group (P = 0.000, P < 0.05, respectively). However, other indicators showed no statistical differences. In female AGA patients, the values of waist circumference, hip circumference, and waist-hip ratio were significantly higher than those in the control group (P = 0.001, P = 0.003, P < 0.05, respectively). Systolic blood pressure and total cholesterol were also higher in AGA female patients compared to the control group, with statistically significant differences in all the above-mentioned factors.

TABLE 2.

Comparison between the MS risk factors.

Males P-value Females P-value


AGA (n = 646) Controls (n = 768) AGA (n = 116) Controls (n = 2,173)
Age 57.92 ± 7.50 54.20 ± 9.62 0.000* 58.21 ± 7.27 54.78 ± 8.45 0.000*
BMI 25.30 ± 3.38 25.67 ± 7.62 0.256 25.34 ± 3.45 25.18 ± 7.14 0.811
Waist circumference 87.38 ± 12.30 87.01 ± 9.94 0.542 85.44 ± 8.95 82.37 ± 9.57 0.001*
Hip circumference 95.93 ± 10.00 95.43 ± 6.94 0.267 96.08 ± 6.10 94.03 ± 7.34 0.003*
WHR 0.91 ± 0.05 0.91 ± 0.06 0.727 0.89 ± 0.06 0.88 ± 0.07 0.038*
SBP 136.36 ± 18.22 132.37 ± 17.75 0.000* 141.51 ± 21.21 136.18 ± 20.28 0.006*
DBP 86.78 ± 11.38 85.51 ± 11.82 0.041* 84.76 ± 12.07 83.96 ± 11.94 0.484
FPG 5.79 ± 1.23 5.89 ± 1.37 0.158 5.90 ± 1.77 5.69 ± 1.39 0.208
TC 4.45 ± 0.85 4.50 ± 0.89 0.322 4.89 ± 0.75 4.67 ± 0.89 0.008*
TG 1.81 ± 1.83 1.95 ± 2.35 0.230 1.70 ± 1.68 1.67 ± 1.34 0.815
HDL-c 1.40 ± 0.28 1.39 ± 0.30 0.537 1.50 ± 0.22 1.47 ± 0.27 0.234
UA level 358.24 ± 79.49 355.80 ± 85.62 0.582 283.43 ± 75.62 273.98 ± 64.79 0.129

*P < 0.05.

Further analysis was conducted considering the severity of AGA as the standard. Our results showed that male subjects with severe AGA (grade V–VII) indicated higher risks of hypertension, MS, and hyperuricemia compared to those with mild (grade I–II) and moderate AGA (grade III–IV) and the controls. However, only hypertension reached a significant statistical difference (Table 3). In females, the severity of AGA showed significantly elevated waist circumference, hip circumference, and waist-hip ratio compared to that of the control group (P = 0.000, P = 0.020, P = 0.001, respectively, Tables 4, 5). Generally, in both males and females with AGA, the severity of hair loss showed an increase in the incidence of hypertension, dysglycemia, dyslipidemia, MS, and hyperuricemia.

TABLE 3.

Comparison of MS risk factors among men exhibiting different severity of AGA.

AGA group (Norwood classification) Control group (n, %) χ2 P-value

I–II (n, %) III–IV (n, %) V–VII (n, %)
BMI ≥ 25 149 (55.39) 102 (47.00) 85 (53.13) 423 (55.08) 4.829 0.185
24.0 ≤ BMI < 28.0 125 (46.47) 86 (39.63) 71 (44.38) 320 (41.67) 2.908 0.406
BMI ≥ 28.0 56 (20.82) 41 (18.89) 34 (21.25) 169 (22.01) 1.102 0.798
Central obesity 112 (41.64) 75 (34.56) 58 (36.25) 295 (38.41) 2.834 0.418
Hypertension 122 (45.35) 119 (54.84) 91 (56.86) 329 (42.84) 17.223 0.001*
Pathoglycemia 117 (43.49) 82 (37.79) 73 (45.63) 329 (42.84) 2.756 0.431
Diabetes 47 (17.47) 33 (15.21) 29 (18.13) 152 (19.79) 2.617 0.455
Dyslipidemia 64 (23.79) 54 (24.88) 41 (25.63) 197 (25.65) 0.392 0.942
TC 10 (3.72) 7 (3.23) 2 (1.25) 27 (3.52) 2.393 0.495
TG 47 (17.47) 41 (18.89) 34 (21.25) 154 (20.05) 1.216 0.749
HDL-c 23 (8.55) 16 (7.37) 12 (7.50) 57 (7.42) 0.394 0.941
MS 80 (29.74) 60 (27.65) 53 (33.13) 230 (29.95) 1.322 0.724
HUA 57 (21.19) 46 (21.20) 38 (23.75) 167 (21.74) 0.463 0.927

*P < 0.05. Pathoglycemia includes pre-diabetes and diabetes; dyslipidemia refers to abnormal levels of total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein.

TABLE 4.

Comparison of MS risk factors among women exhibiting different severity of AGA.

AGA group (Ludwig classification) Control group (n, %) χ2 P-value

I (n, %) II (n, %) III (n, %)
BMI ≥ 25 39 (100) 61 (100) 16 (100) 2,172(94.89) 0.047 0.829
24.0 ≤ BMI < 28.0 14 (35.90) 29 (47.54) 8 (50.00) 871 (40.08) 1.422 0.233
BMI ≥ 28.0 2 (5.13) 14 (22.95) 5 (31.25) 399 (18.36) 0.724 0.395
Central obesity 12 (30.77) 36 (59.02) 13 (81.25) 804 (37.00) 20.198 0.000*
Hypertension 22 (56.41) 34 (55.74) 7 (43.75) 1,054(48.50) 0.796 0.372
Pathoglycemia 16 (41.03) 26 (42.62) 9 (56.25) 914 (42.06) 0.477 0.490
Diabetes 6 (15.38) 14 (22.95) 3 (18.75) 317 (14.59) 2.770 0.096
Dyslipidemia 7 (17.95) 9 (14.75) 3 (18.75) 446 (20.52) 1.083 0.298
TC 4 (10.26) 2 (3.28) 1 (6.25) 102 (4.69) 0.059 0.808
TG 4 (10.26) 9 (14.75) 2 (12.50) 352 (16.20) 0.552 0.457
HDL-c 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) 56 (2.58) 2.684 0.101
MS 8 (20.51) 18 (29.51) 6 (37.50) 606 (27.89) 0.171 0.679
HUA 2 (5.13) 7 (11.48) 0 (0.00) 65 (2.99) 6.692 0.010*

*P < 0.05. Pathoglycemia includes pre-diabetes and diabetes; dyslipidemia refers to abnormal levels of total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein.

TABLE 5.

Comparison of waist circumference, hip circumference, and waist-hip ratio values between women with different severity of AGA and the control group.

AGA group (Ludwig classification) Control group F P-value

I II III
Waist circumference 81.94 ± 7.54 86.52 ± 9.01 89.83 ± 9.08 82.37 ± 9.57 6.975 0.000*
Hip circumference 95.12 ± 5.49 96.38 ± 6.48 97.24 ± 6.01 94.03 ± 7.34 3.303 0.020*
WHR 0.86 ± 0.06 0.90 ± 0.06 0.922 ± 0.05 0.88 ± 0.07 5.442 0.001*

*P < 0.05.

Furthermore, we investigated the correlation of AGA with other relevant indicators of MS, where both dependent (AGA) and independent variables (BMI, abnormal blood glucose, hypertension, dyslipidemia, waist circumference, and hyperuricemia) were included in the ordered logistic regression model analysis.

Upon introducing independent variables, the results of the likelihood ratio test showed a statistical significance (male: χ2 = 17.583, P < 0.001; female: χ2 = 23.576, P < 0.01), suggesting their effectiveness on AGA.

Table 6 shows that the P-value of hypertension in male subjects was <0.001, while the P-values of BMI, abnormal blood glucose, dyslipidemia, waist circumference, and hyperuricemia were all greater than 0.05. This suggested that hypertension, instead of BMI, blood glucose, blood lipids, and other factors, affected AGA in males. Furthermore, the partial regression coefficient for hypertension was −0.412, indicating a significant positive relation between hypertension and the severity of AGA.

TABLE 6.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis including the MS parameters of male AGA patients.

Coefficients SE Wald χ2 P-value 95% confidence interval

Lower limit Upper limit
Dependent variables
Grade = 0 0.075 0.170 0.195 0.659 –0.259 0.409
Grade = 1 1.463 0.176 69.288 0.000 1.119 1.808
Independent variables
BMI ≥ 25 = 0 0.202 0.132 2.336 0.126 –0.057 0.462
BMI ≥ 25 = 1
Pathoglycemia = 0 0.049 0.107 0.210 0.647 –0.161 0.259
Pathoglycemia = 1
Hypertension = 0 −0.412 0.106 15.228 0.000 –0.619 –0.205
Hypertension = 1
Dyslipidemia = 0 −0.044 0.113 0.152 0.696 –0.265 0.177
Dyslipidemia = 1
Waistline = 0 0.019 0.135 0.019 0.890 –0.246 0.284
Waistline = 1
HUA = 0 0.027 0.130 0.045 0.833 –0.227 0.282
HUA = 1

Table 7 shows that dyslipidemia, waist circumference, and hyperuricemia in female subjects showed corresponding P-values of <0.05. However, abnormal BMI, blood glucose, and high blood pressure parameters with P-values greater than 0.05 suggested that dyslipidemia, waist circumference, and hyperuricemia, rather than BMI, blood pressure, blood glucose, and other factors, affected AGA in women. Moreover, the partial regression coefficients of dyslipidemia, waist circumference, and hyperuricemia were found to be 0.508, −0.832, and −1.033, respectively, indicating their positive correlation with the severity of AGA.

TABLE 7.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis, including the MS parameters of female AGA patients.

Coefficients SE Wald χ2 P-value 95% confidence interval

Lower limit Upper limit
Dependent variables
Grade = 0 1.983 0.378 27.516 0.000 1.242 2.724
Grade = 1 2.515 0.385 42.736 0.000 1.761 3.268
Independent variables
BMI ≥ 25 = 0 0.432 0.240 3.244 0.072 –0.038 0.902
BMI ≥ 25 = 1
Pathoglycemia = 0 0.010 0.203 0.002 0.961 –0.388 0.408
Pathoglycemia = 1
Hypertension = 0 −0.204 0.200 1.042 0.307 –0.596 0.188
Hypertension = 1
Dyslipidemia = 0 0.508 0.227 5.020 0.025 0.064 0.953
Dyslipidemia = 1
Waistline = 0 −0.832 0.241 11.886 0.001 –1.305 –0.359
Waistline = 1
HUA = 0 −1.033 0.384 7.258 0.007 –1.785 –0.282
HUA = 1

Discussion

Androgenetic alopecia is the most common hair loss observed in both genders. Although the onset of AGA is not dependent on race, it varies based on it. Generally, the prevalence of AGA is highest in Caucasians, with 30 and 50% of white men having AGA by the age of 30 and 50 years, respectively (1). We found that the prevalence rate of AGA was 45.72% in Chinese males and 5.05% in Chinese females. Compared to the last decade (2), the onset rate of AGA has more than doubled in Chinese males but has remained nearly unchanged in females. Moreover, the prevalence of AGA has been showing a global increasing trend (5).

Metabolic syndrome is a series of metabolic disorders associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (6). Several factors are considered responsible for the pathogenesis of MS, including genetic predisposition, insulin resistance, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, vascular abnormalities, inflammation, hyperandrogenism, and hyperuricemia. Previous studies on Chinese people have shown the prevalence rate of MS to be 19.58–24.2% (7, 8) while our study showed the prevalence of MS to be 29.91% in males and 27.87% in females. Cotton et al. (3) was the first to argue regarding a certain implication of the risk of cardiovascular disease in male AGA patients. Since then, many studies have shown the association of AGA with a high risk of MS, with such patients showing a significantly worse metabolic profile (9). In our study, although AGA patients were at an advanced age, a positive correlation was not observed between AGA and MS. Our results only showed significantly higher systolic blood pressure levels in both male and female AGA patients compared to that of the control. Furthermore, some previous studies have revealed that AGA patients have higher blood pressure (4, 10, 11), which can be explained by the increase in salt corticosteroids (including aldosterone) (12). Moreover, studies have shown that compared to patients with hypertension in the control group, AGA patients with hypertension showed higher levels of aldosterone. Besides, the increase in serum aldosterone level may be directly involved in the development of AGA. Contrastingly, elevated aldosterone levels may lead to impaired vascular endothelial function, decreased vascular compliance, and promoted renal reabsorption of water and sodium ions, resulting in the retention of water and sodium and, in turn, hypertension. Noteworthily, spironolactone, an aldosterone receptor antagonist, whose main mechanism of action is anti-androgenicity, was also used in the treatment of female patients with AGA.

Our results showed a higher prevalence of central obesity in the female AGA group than in the control group, which was dependent on the severity of AGA. However, the female patients with AGA showed no statistical difference either in weight or BMI compared to the control. Arias-Santiago et al. (11) reported a higher mean circumference in female AGA patients compared to that of the control (86.5 vs. 37.8%, P = 0.001) but showed no difference in weight or BMI. This suggested an abdominal redistribution of fat in female AGA patients, which was an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease.

Conclusion

Although many studies have observed an association between AGA and MS, it has not been elucidated yet. Even in our study, we did not observe a relationship between AGA and MS. However, an early diagnosis remains a non-negligible issue since significantly elevated systolic blood pressure level is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Jiangsu Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (JSJK2016-B003-03) and Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

HZ was responsible for epidemiological investigation. HG and TM were responsible for statistical analysis. YG, YW, and JY were responsible for guidance and supervision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Service Network Project (STS Program) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFJ-STS-ZDTP-063), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFA0201600), the Ministry of Science and Technology focused on the research of “Early identification, early diagnosis and cutting point of diabetes risk factors” (2016YFC1305700), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51925203, 81804100), Jiangsu Provincial Basic Public Health Service Innovation Pilot Project (WDF15-967), and Jiangsu Medical Device Industry Technology Innovation CenterJoint Fund (SYC2018004).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.Deeknamkul W. Potential targets in the discovery of new hair growth promoters for androgenic alopecia. Expert Opin Therap Targets. (2014) 18:787–806. 10.1517/14728222.2014.922956 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang TL, Zhou C, Shen YW, Wang XY, Ding XL, Tian S, et al. Prevalence of androgenetic alopecia in China: a community-based study in six cities. Br J Dermatol. (2010) 162:843–7. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09640.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cotton SG, Nixon JM, Carpenter RG, Evans DW. Factors discriminating men with coronary heart disease from healthy controls. Br Heart J. (1972) 34:458–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Seyran OG, Asli AB, Emine D. Is there really relationship between androgenetic alopecia and metabolic syndrome? Dermatol Res Pract. (2015) 2015:980310. 10.1155/2015/980310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ellis JA, Sinclair RD. Male pattern baldness: current treatments, future prospects. Drug Discov Today. (2008) 13:791–7. 10.1016/j.drudis.2008.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fulop T, Tessier D, Carpentier A. The metabolic syndrome. Pathologie Biol. (2006) 54:375–86. 10.1016/j.patbio.2006.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Guo HJ, Nian X, Liang YF, Wang XL, Li KL, Wang Q, et al. The prevalence and risk factors of metabolic syndrome in Chinese population based on mulicenter cross-sectional survey. Chin J Dis Control Prev. (2019) 23:796–801. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.The Writing Committee of the Report on Cardiovascular Health and Diseases in China. Key points of report on cardiovascular health and diseases in China 2020. Chin J Cardiovasc Res. (2021) 19:582–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Qiu Y, Zhou X, Fu S, Luo S, Li Y. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between metabolic syndrome and androgenetic alopecia. Acta Derm Venereol. (2022) 102:adv00645. 10.2340/actadv.v101.1012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Danesh-Shakiba M, Poorolajal J, Alirezaei P. Androgenetic alopecia: relationship to anthropometric indices, blood pressure and life-style habits. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. (2020) 13:137–43. 10.2147/CCID.S231940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Arias-Santiago S, Gutiérrez-Salmerón MT, Castellote-Caballero L, Buendía-Eisman A, Naranjo-Sintes R. Androgenetic alopecia and cardiovascular risk factors in men and women: a comparative study. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2010) 63:420–9. 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.10.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Arias-Santiago S, Gutiérrez-Salmerón MT, Buendía-Eisman A, Girón-Prieto MS, Naranjo-Sintes R. Hypertension and aldosterone levels in women with early-onset androgenetic alopecia. Br J Dermatol. (2010) 162:786–9. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09588.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Frontiers in Medicine are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES