Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Nov 22;12:20106. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24663-y

Two-dimensional SiC/AlN based type-II van der Waals heterobilayer as a promising photocatalyst for overall water disassociation

Naim Ferdous 1, Md Sherajul Islam 1,2,, Jeshurun Biney 1, Catherine Stampfl 3, Jeongwon Park 1,4
PMCID: PMC9684528  PMID: 36418922

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures made by vertical assembling of two different layers have drawn immense attention in the photocatalytic water disassociation process. Herein, we suggest a novel 2D/2D vdW heterobilayer consisting of silicon carbide (SiC) and aluminum nitride (AlN) as an exciting photocatalyst for solar-to-hydrogen conversion reactions using first-principles calculations. Notably, the heterostructure presents an inherent type-II band orientation wherein the photogenic holes and electrons are spatially separated in the SiC layer and the AlN layer, respectively. Our results indicate that the SiC/AlN heterostructure occupies a suitable band-gap of 2.97 eV which straddles the kinetic overpotentials of the hydrogen production reaction and oxygen production reaction. Importantly, the built-in electric field at the interface created by substantial charge transfer prohibits carrier recombination and further improves the photocatalytic performance. The heterostructure has an ample absorption profile ranging from the ultraviolet to the near-infrared regime, while the intensity of the absorption reaches up to 2.16 × 105 cm−1. In addition, external strain modulates the optical absorption of the heterostructure effectively. This work provides an intriguing insight into the important features of the SiC/AlN heterostructure and renders useful information on the experimental design of a novel vdW heterostructure for solar energy-driven water disassociation with superior efficiency.

Subject terms: Energy science and technology, Materials science, Nanoscience and technology, Nanoscale devices, Nanoscale materials

Introduction

The generation of oxygen and hydrogen by solar energy induced photocatalytic water splitting is one of the most favorable methods for meeting future energy demands13. However, to develop a high performance water-splitting photocatalysis system, it requires a material with an appropriate band-gap, outstanding carrier separation for effective surface activity, and appropriate redox potentials to drive the redox reaction smoothly, as well as photochemical stability, environmental friendliness, and commercial feasibility3,4. Owing to these requirements for the semiconducting materials to be effective photocatalysts and their significance in the water disassociation process, a substantial amount of research has been carried out in this field. Fujishima and Honda were the first to report solar energy driven water disassociation over TiO2 in 19725. Following their groundbreaking work, a great many efforts have been made towards investigating efficient photocatalytic materials and significant numbers of photocatalysts including conjugated polymers68, oxyhalides9, oxynitrides10, metal chalcogenides, and metal oxides1113, and so on are reported. Nevertheless, the practical applicability of these materials is severely limited by their higher electron–hole recombination rate accompanied by the poor absorption profile in the visible regime14. In this context, two-dimensional (2D) materials have recently been in the limelight for their capability in photocatalytic water splitting which includes layered transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs)15, Janus TMDs16,17, MXene18, graphene-like honeycomb BC3 single layer19, C3N420, phosphorene21, etc. Despite having promising physical and chemical properties together with an extremely high ratio of the surface to the volume, monolayer 2D materials exhibit low quantum efficiency in photocatalysis because of their smaller carrier lifetime due to the photogenic carriers remaining in one region for limited time intervals.

In this regard, type-II van der Waals heterostructures (vdWHs) made by stacking of two different 2D materials have been proposed as a promising solution to this problem2224. As 2D/2D type-II heterobilayers provide spatial separation of the photoexcited electrons and holes in two distinct layers effectively to inhibit carrier recombination, the quantum efficiency of photocatalysis is improved significantly. In addition, these heterostructures can mediate their electronic band structures to satisfy the potential requirements of the solar-to-hydrogen conversion reaction25. The inherent electric field facilitates the separation of the majority of photogenic carriers in distinct layers of the structure, prolonging the lifetime of the photo-induced carriers. The quantum confinement in the heterostructures further enriches electron–electron correlation and exciton binding energy. Moreover, 2D vdWHs enable photoexcited electrons and holes to make the largest possible contact surface with water while reducing the gap electrons and holes migrate, decreasing electron–hole recombination rate, and improving photocatalytic performance2527. Additionally, the dynamic overpotentials of the oxygen and hydrogen production reactions are increased due to the intrinsic dipole moment of the vdWHs, which further ensures the photocatalytic water disassociation process.

Over the last few years, numerous theoretical and experimental studies have been devoted to enhancing catalytic performance by creating vdWHs through diverse 2D materials, including SiC/MoS228, phosphorene/g-C3N429, InSe/SiH30, SiC/MSSe (M = Mo, W)31, AlN/Blue-phosphorene32, SiC/BS33, AlN/MX2 (MX2 = MoSe2, WS2, and WSe2)34, GaAs/SiH23, SiC/GaN35, SiC/GeC36, MoSe/AlN (GaN)37, h-BN/C2N38, CdO/CdS39 and so forth. In particular, 2D silicon carbide (SiC) based bilayer heterostructures have been found to be attractive and exciting candidates for advanced photocatalytic water decomposition reaction which is attributable to the excellent optical characteristics, stable planar structure, high thermal capability, outstanding electrical conductivity, and direct bandgap semiconducting properties of the SiC sheet4043. Chemical inertness, excellent strength, and high saturated mobility of the carriers of the SiC layer have outlined its immense potential as a heterogeneous catalyst41,44,45. On the other hand, graphene-like single layered aluminum nitride (AlN), a wide-band-gap semiconductor46 has sparked a lot of attention among researchers as a new and classic 2D III-nitride material in optical, spintronic, optoelectronic, and substrate applications47. 2D AlN exhibits comparable symmetry and lattice parameter to the SiC monolayer with a little mismatch, suggesting the easy realization of the SiC/AlN heterobilayer in experiments. Recent investigations reveal that SiC can be prepared either by sonicating wurtzite SiC48 or by substituting the C atom in a graphene structure with a Si atom43. Researchers have successfully prepared a thin SiC structure using a catalyst-free carbothermal technique and a post-sonication procedure49. A new experiment on true 2D SiC exfoliated successfully from bulk SiC was published recently by Chabi et al.50. Moreover, it has been found possible to produce high purity monolayer films of AlN using standard growth procedures51,52. Nevertheless, heterostructures consisting of layered SiC and AlN sheets have not been analyzed in the literature to assess their potential for photocatalytic activity. Hence, it is worthwhile to adapt the 2D/2D vdWH comprising of the SiC and AlN layer and reveal its photocatalytic water decomposition performance.

In this article, we propose a type-II vdWH consisting of 2D SiC/AlN as an efficient photocatalyst for water disassociation using first-principles calculations. We consider six likely configurations and study their viability in the hydrogen production reaction and the oxygen production reaction by investigating structural, electronic, interfacial, and optical properties. The band edge positions of the SiC/AIN bilayer heterostructure straddle the redox reaction of water decomposition at acidic as well as neutral environment, realizing the overall catalytic reaction. The electric field at the heterostructure interface formed due to significant amount of charge transfer prevents electron–hole recombination, further improving the photocatalytic performance. We also investigated the effect of biaxial strain on the catalytic performance of the SiC/AlN heterobilayer. All these features point toward the superior photocatalytic performance of the SiC/AlN vdWH and provide insights for the experimental design of type-II 2D/2D catalysts based on SiC and AlN sheets.

Computational details

We conducted first-principles calculations within the framework of density functional theory (DFT) as employed in the MedeA VASP (Vienna ab initio simulation package)53,54. The projector-augmented-wave (PAW) potentials are used to characterize the core electrons55. We considered the optB86b-vdW van der Waals Density Functional (vdW-DF) developed by Klimeš and co-workers56,57 for describing the exchange–correlation interaction of electrons owing to its capability of describing the interaction between the SiC and AlN layers effectively. The cutoff energy of the plane-wave basis was taken as 500 eV. We sampled the Brillouin-zone with a Γ-centered 24 × 24 × 1 Monkhorst–Pack (MP) grid58 for structural relaxations, electronic and optical properties calculations. A sufficient vacuum region of greater than 15 Å was employed along the Z-axis of the heterostructures in order to avoid the interaction between the two subsequent slabs. Throughout the structural relaxation, the atomic positions and the lattice were relaxed until the total energy (force) converged to 1 × 10–5 eV (0.02 eVÅ−1).

The optical properties of the systems can be determined based on the frequency dependent dielectric function εω=ε1ω+iε2ω, which characterizes a system’s linear response to the electromagnetic field. Kramers–Kronig relations can be used to determine ε1 and ε2 59. We can quantify the imaginary part within the long wavelength limit (q0) in independent particle approximation as:

ϵ2ω=εαβ2ω=4π2e2Ωlimq01q2c,v,k2wkδϵck-ϵvk-ω×uck+eαq|uvkuck+eβq|uvk 1

Here, the primitive cell’s volume is represented by Ω,wk being the weights of the K point, while the spin degeneracy is described by introducing factor 2 in the summation. The ϵvk (ϵck) values indicate energies of the k dependent valence (conduction) band, while cell periodic part of the pseudo-wave function are represented by uvk and uck; eα,β being the unit vectors towards the cartesian coordinate directions. We can determine the real part (ε1) based on the Kramers–Kronig transformation59:

ε1ω=εαβ1ω=1+2πP0εαβ2ωωω2ω2+iηdω 2

Here, P is the principal value while a trivial complex shifting (η) of 0.1 is introduced in order to smoothen the real part (ε1) a little, which is admissible for most of the computations60. The optical spectrum of the material can be calculated using the formula:

α(ω)=2ωc[{ε12(ω)+ε22(ω)}0.5-ε1(ω)]0.5 3

where α being the absorption coefficient, ε12 and ε22 refer to the dielectric function’s real and the imaginary parts, respectively, ω stands for angular frequency while c is the speed of light in the vacuum.

Results and discussion

The analysis begins with the electronic characteristics of the constituents, the SiC monolayer, and AlN monolayer. The band structures of the free standing SiC monolayer and the AlN monolayer are illustrated in Fig. S1. The free-standing SiC monolayer reveals semiconducting property with an indirect bandgap of 2.514 eV. The valence band maximum (VBM) is at the high symmetry K point, while the conduction band minimum (CBM) of isolated SiC is located at the M point. The result corresponds well with the study of Hoat et al. (indirect band gap of 2.492)61 and Peng et al.35. In addition, the C-2p state dominates in the valence band of the isolated SiC monolayer, while the predominant contribution for the conduction band comes from the Si-3p state61. The isolated AlN monolayer also demonstrates semiconducting behavior. In our calculation, we obtained an indirect bandgap of 2.784 eV for single layered AlN. The VBM is positioned at the high symmetry K point whereas the CBM of the pristine AlN layer is at the Γ point. This is also in line with the literature62,63. Moreover, the VBM of the free-standing AlN layer comes mainly from N pz orbital while the CBM is attributed to N s and Al s orbitals63.

The SiC/AlN van der Waals bilayer heterostructure (vdWBH) is achieved through staking the primitive cell of the monolayer AlN above the primitive cell of 2D-SiC. Our calculation yielded the lattice constants of 3.094 Å and 3.126 Å for SiC and AlN, respectively, which are in excellent agreement with the previous theoretical and experimental results46,47,50,6471. Accordingly, a small lattice mismatch (LMM) of ~ 1.02% is present between the SiC and AlN monolayers, as obtained using the formula LMM=aSiC-aAlN0.5×(aSiC+aAlN)×100%, where aSiC and aAlN are the optimized lattice constants of the 2D-SiC and 2D-AlN, respectively. This small lattice mismatch suggests that the two different layers can be stacked vertically to build the desired heterostructure. As reported by Hu et al.72, it is promising if the heterostructure is built with a lattice mismatch of less than 5%.

As structural modification leads to changes in physical properties, we considered six prospective configurations of the SiC/AlN vdWBH to analyze the effect of different stacking geometries. The six optimized stacking configurations are shown in Fig. 1 and marked as AA-1, AA-2, AB-1, AB-2, AC-1 and AC-2. In the AA-1 configuration, the Al and N atom of the AlN layer are placed right above the Si and C atom of the SiC monolayer, respectively while the AA-2 stacking pattern is obtained by pacing the Al and N atom straight above the C and Si atom of the 2D-SiC respectively. Configuration AB-1 (AB-2) is achieved by positioning the Al atom (N atom) vertically above the Si atom of the SiC monolayer whereas the N atom (Al atom) of the 2D-AlN is above the center of the hexagon formed by the SiC layer and C atom is directly below the center of the hexagon formed by the AlN layer. Similarly, we obtained the AC-1 (AC-2) configuration by placing the Al atom (N atom) directly above the C atom of the 2D-SiC whereas the N atom (Al atom) is placed right above the center of the hexagon formed by the SiC monolayer and the Si atom is located straight below the center of the hexagon formed by AlN layer. Our structure of SiC/AlN vdWBH is comparable to the GeC/GaN vdW heterojunction studied by Lou and Lee26. Owing to similar lattice parameters of the GeC and GaN layer with a very small lattice mismatch of 0.63%, they formed the heterojunction by stacking the GeC monolayer and GaN monolayer and considered six similar stacked forms to analyze its potential as photo-catalyst for the water-splitting process. Our present vdWBH structure is also analogues to the ZnO/GaN vdW heterostructure 73. Owing to a little lattice mismatch of 0.26%, Ren et al.73 constructed the vertical heterostructure composed of monolayered GaN and ZnO and formed six representative stacking patterns for its theoretical prediction as a photo-catalyst. Besides, while studying 2D GaN/SiC bilayer, Peng et al.35 also considered the six most likely structures of the GaN/SiC bilayer.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Top and side views of the SiC/AlN bilayer heterostructure in the six configurations considered: (a) AA-1, (b) AA-2, (c) AB-1, (d) AB-2, (e) AC-1, (f) AC-2. ‘D’ represents the equilibrium layer spacing between the SiC layer and the AlN layer. (g) Variation of the binding energy per interface area as a function of layer spacing between the SiC and AlN layers for the six stacking configurations.

With a view to assessing the relative stability of the SiC/AlN vdWBH efficiently, we estimated the binding energy (BE) of the heterostructure utilizing the expression:

BE=(ESiC/AlN-ESiC-EAlN)/A 4

where ESiC/AlN stands for the total energy of the SiC/AlN vdWBH, ESiC and EAlN refer to the energy of the isolated monolayers of SiC and AlN, respectively. ‘A’ stands for the interface area. A negative value of binding energy implies that the system is energetically favorable. It also points out toward easy realization of the system. The more negative the binding energy, the more stable the system is. Conversely, a positive binding energy value indicates structural instability. The binding energy values of the six configurations are enlisted in Table S1. As the binding energies of the six configurations suggest, all the stacking patterns are stable while configuration AA-2 is the most energetically favorable one with the minimum binding energy. The change of the binding energy with respect to the layer spacing between SiC and AlN monolayers is depicted in Fig. 1g. The layer spacing for which the binding energy is minimum is the optimum layer spacing (D). Table S1 enrolls the values of optimized interlayer spacing for six patterns. Stacking configuration AA-2 has the minimum inter-layer spacing between the SiC and AlN layer with the greatest negative binding energy (i.e., the most stable configuration). However, there is no covalent bond between the SiC monolayer and the AlN monolayer. The absence of covalent bond is confirmed by calculating the bond length between the atoms of the two different layers. Taking the AA-2 configuration with the minimum optimum layer spacing (2.31 Å), the sum of the covalent radius of Si and N is 1.87 Å (1.16 + 0.71 = 1.87) while the sum is 2.01 Å for Al and C atom (1.26 + 0.75 = 2.01)74. The summed values are less than 2.31 Å (for other configurations the equilibrium layer spacing is more than 3 Å), which eliminates the prospect of creating any covalent bond between the SiC and AlN layer. Besides, the binding energy per interface area renders quantitative information on the type of interaction between the two layers of the heterostructure. Taking the most stable AA-2 configuration, the binding energy per interface area is −69.9 meV/Å2, which suggests that weak van der Waals forces are predominating in the heterostructure75,76. This result is comparable to the ZnO/GaN vdW heterostructure studied by Ren et al.73. For the most energetically favorable AA pattern of the ZnO/GaN vdW heterostructure, they reported −60.77 meV/Å2 binding energy and 2.41 Å interface distance 73 along with weak vdW interactions in the heterostructure73. Nguyen et al.77 also reported similar binding energy for Boron Phosphide/MoGe2N4 vdW heterostructure (−67.28 meV/Å2 for their most stable ‘stacking-II’ pattern) but with a higher interlayer spacing 3.08 Å. In this context, He et al.78 reported an interlayer distance of 2.604 Å between InSe and g-C3N4 monolayers for the most energetically favorable HN1 configuration while investigating InSe/g-C3N4 heterostructure, comparable to our AA-2 configuration.

The electronic band structures of the six configurations of the SiC/AlN vdWBH are portrayed in Fig. 2, while the electronic band gaps and the relevant VBM and CBM positions of the six structures are enlisted in Table S1. The AA-2 pattern (most energetically favorable configuration) demonstrates an indirect bandgap of 2.97 eV. The VBM is at the Γ–K route while the CBM is placed at the high symmetry Γ point. For our subsequent calculations, among the six stacking configurations of the SiC/AlN vdWBH, we concentrated on the AA-2 configuration i.e., the most stable stacking configuration. In order to study the band alignment of the SiC/AlN vdWBH, the projected band structure and the density of states (DOS) of the heterostructure (AA-2 configuration) are examined. The projected band structure of the heterostructure along with the contributions from the Si, C, Al, and N atoms is shown in Fig. 3a. Obviously, the C atom dominates in the VBM of the heterostructure (indicated by the cyber yellow color in the projected band diagram), while the CBM is provided mostly by the N atom (represented by the navy-blue color in the figure), which confirms the formation of the typical type-II band orientation in the SiC/AlN heterostructure. To analyze the nature of the electronic states at VBM and CBM to a greater extent, the partial density of states (PDOS) of the SiC/AlN vdWBH is calculated. Enlarged views of the PDOS around the CBM and VBM are shown in Fig. 3b,c, respectively. Clearly, the CBM is mostly made up of the N-p and N-s states, while the VBM is dominated by the C-p state. This further confirms that the SiC/AlN heterostructure has a typical type-II band alignment. Photogenic electrons and holes will accumulate on the surfaces of the AlN sheet and SiC sheet, respectively, leading to indirect excitons. Consequently, the type-II band configuration of the SiC/AlN vdWBH separates the photogenic electrons and holes effectively in real space. The heterostructure, therefore, appears to be a promising candidate for solar-energy-driven water decomposition as well as high-performance optoelectronic devices which prevent electron–hole recombination37.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Electronic band diagrams of six stacking configurations of the SiC/AlN van der Waals heterostructure: (a) AA-1, (b) AA-2, (c) AB-1, (d) AB-2, (e) AC-1, (f) AC-2. (g) Calculated electronic band gaps of the six configurations of the heterostructure.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Projected band structure of the SiC/AlN bilayer heterostructure for the most stable AA-2 configuration with the contributions from the N, C, Si, and Al atoms are represented by navy blue, cyber yellow, green and sky-blue colors, respectively. Magnified view of the partial density of states (PDOS) around the (b) CBM, and the (c) VBM.

The work function (Φ) is an important quantity generally utilized as an inherent reference for band alignment79,80. It is the least energy necessary to transfer an electron from the Fermi energy level to the free space. The following relation is utilized to calculate the work function of a semiconductor:

Φ=Evacuum-EFemi 5

where EFermi being the Fermi energy and Evacuum refers to a static electron’s energy in the free space close to the surface. Fermi energy is determined from the calculation of the ground-state electronic structure. One can estimate the value of Evacuum from the plot of the average electrostatic potential for a surface calculation employing an adequate amount of vacuum in the unit cell. Fig. S2a–c, respectively illustrates the average electrostatic potential plot of the SiC monolayer, AlN sheet and SiC/AlN vdWBH. From expression (5), we obtained the work functions values as 5.06 eV, 5.38 eV and 5.31 eV for 2D SiC, AlN monolayer and SiC/AlN vdWBH, respectively. When the SiC sheet and the AlN layer are in close contact, because of the Fermi level of the SiC being higher than that of AlN, electrons will spontaneously diffuse from the SiC monolayer to the AlN monolayer. The Fermi level of SiC will shift downward gradually while the Fermi level of AlN will shift upward in accord with the rise in the number of transported electrons and ultimately achieves the same level in the system, which is responsible for the 5.31 eV work function of the heterostructure. Figure S2(c) also suggests similar characteristics which is attributable to the higher potential energy of the SiC layer in contrast to the AlN layer. Therefore, positive charges will aggregate on the SiC sheet while the negative charges will aggregate on the AlN sheet and consequently a built-in electric field (Ei) will be formed, directed from the SiC layer to the AlN layer. The electric field, Ei stimulates the inside carrier drift of the SiC/AlN vdWH and eventually an equilibrium is achieved through the diffusion force.

Suitable band edge positions of the semiconducting material are crucial to induce photocatalytic water disassociation reaction. We, therefore, explore the band edge locations of the SiC/AlN vdWBH to examine its potential in the solar-to-hydrogen conversion process. The band alignments of the semiconducting materials are calculated using the relations26,36,81:

EVBM=-X-Eg2 6
ECBM=-X+Eg2 7

where EVBM and ECBM refer to the VBM and CBM energy levels of the semiconductor, respectively. X denotes the material’s Mulliken electronegativity, which can be determined by taking the geometric mean of the Mulliken electronegativities of the component atoms82,83. Eg is the electronic bandgap of the corresponding material. The Mulliken electronegativities for Si, C, Al and N atom are 4.76, 6.27, 3.21 and 7.27, correspondingly84. Our calculation yielded the values of X as 5.46, 4.83 and 5.14 for the isolated SiC layer, AlN sheet, and SiC/AlN vdWBH, respectively. Generally, a semiconductor must meet certain requirements in order to generate hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2) through photocatalysis: (a) the energy level of the VBM of the semiconductor must be equal to or below −5.67 eV from the vacuum level (oxidation potential) to generate O2 through oxidation reaction (O2/H2O) at pH  0 environment. (b) CBM energy level should be at least −4.44 eV from the vacuum (reduction potential) to generate H2 through the reduction reaction (H+/H2) at pH  0. (c) An electronic bandgap of a minimum of 1.23 eV of the semiconductor material. (d) The material should possess notable absorption peaks in the ultra-violet (UV) and visible region of the solar energy spectrum to use much of the solar energy and (e) A high ratio of the surface to the volume of the material to promote the photocatalytic action.

The alignments of the energy levels for isolated SiC sheet, free standing single layered AlN and SiC/AlN vdWBH are demonstrated in Fig. 4a. It is important to note that the pH value of the environment inevitably affects the potential of oxidation and reduction reactions. One can determine the standard reduction potential of the hydrogen evolution reaction (H+/H2) by the formula Ered = −4.44 eV + pH × 0.059 eV while the standared oxidation potential can be obtained using the relation Eox = −5.67 eV + pH × 0.059 eV. The redox potentials for a neutral environment (pH  7) were also analyzed, indicated by red dotted lines in Fig. 4a. As the CBM and VBM of the SiC sheet and AlN layer suggest in Fig. 4a, the energy gap of 2D-SiC extends from −6.717 to −4.203 eV while for 2D AlN the energy gap extends from −6.222 to −3.438 eV. The AlN monolayer suits photocatalytic water splitting action for both pH  0 (acidic) and pH  7 (neutral) environments, but the SiC sheet does not satisfy the condition of water splitting at neutral environment. Nevertheless, the bandgap of the SiC/AlN vdWBH spans from −6.622 to −3.652 eV which satisfies the condition for photocatalytic water disassociation in both the neutral and the acidic environment. The free-standing SiC layer and AlN layer do not have the type-II band configuration to limit the photogenic carrier recombination and consequently, the SiC/AlN vdWBH can be a promising candidate for photo-catalysis separating the photogenic electrons and holes and inducing the water decomposition reactions to produce oxygen and hydrogen.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) Band edge locations of free-standing the SiC layer, the AlN monolayer, and the SiC/AlN heterostructure. (b) Schematic illustration of the photocatalytic action of the SiC/AlN van der Waals heterostructure with the transfer of the photogenic carriers at the interface. VBO and CBO refer to the valence band offset and conduction band offset, respectively.

Figure 4b describes the mechanism of solar energy driven water decomposition in the SiC/AlN vdWH along with the migration of photo-generated carriers in the type-II band orientation. When the heterostructure will be illuminated by the solar irradiation and photon energy will be higher than the bandgap value of SiC and AlN, excited electrons will start migrating from the valence band to the conduction band of SiC and AlN sheets, leaving behind holes in the valence band. Once the photo-generated electrons reach the conduction band of SiC, due to the promotion of conduction band offset (CBO), they will move to the conduction band of AlN. On the other hand, owing to the promotion of the valence band offset (VBO), holes created in the valence band will start moving from AlN to SiC simultaneously. The CBO has been calculated as 0.28 eV, while the VBO is 0.55 eV. Accordingly, photo-excited positive and negative charge carriers are effectively separated across the heterojunction and will take part in the photocatalytic redox reactions. Hydrogen will be produced in the AlN sheet while oxygen production will take place at the SiC layer.

As HSE06 functional is a well-known hybrid function that yields an electronic bang-gap value close to the experiment, we have also employed HSE06 functional for a more exact electronic structure calculation85. HSE06 calculated projected band diagram for the AA-2 configuration of the SiC/AlN vdWH is illustrated in Fig. 5a. We obtained a 4.058 eV electronic band gap for the AA-2 structure employing the HSE06 functional. The contributions from four different atoms are represented by four different colors. It is apparent that VBM comes mostly from the C atom (represented by the cyber yellow color), while the N atom dominates in the CBM (indicated by the cyber yellow color). Thus, the formation of type-II band alignment for SiC/AlN vdWBH is again confirmed from the HSE06 calculated band diagram. In addition, the relevant band edge positions are also calculated and depicted in Fig. 5b. The band gap extends from −7.169 to −3.111 eV for the HSE06 functional, ensuring solar energy-driven water splitting for both pH  0 and pH  7 environments.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) Projected band structure of SiC/AlN van der Waals heterostructure (AA-2 configuration) calculated using HSE06 hybrid functional. (b) Relevant band edge positions of the heterostructure obtained after HSE06 band structure calculation.

Furthermore, in order to characterize the charge transfer process and charge distribution between the SiC layer and the AlN layer after the formation of the SiC/AlN vdWBH, the charge density difference (CDD) of the heterobilayer is estimated as:

Δρ=ρSiC/AlN-ρSiC-ρAlN 8

where Δρ is the CDD of the heteostructure, ρSiC/AlN, ρAlN and ρSiC stand for the charge density of the SiC/AlN vdWBH, free standing AlN layer, and isolated SiC layer, respectively. Figure 6 shows the CDD of the SiC/AlN vdWBH. The red color in the CDD plot represents the area where charge is accumulated, and the green color is for the region where charge is depleted. As the CDD plot suggests, electron has been accumulated at the interface area, mainly near the AlN layer, while it has been depleted mostly from the SiC layer in the SiC/AlN heterostructure. This characteristic indicates that charge will be transmitted from the SiC sheet to the AlN sheet. Charge redistribution at the interface area generates an inherent electric field directed from the SiC layer to the AlN layer. This inherent electric field plays an essential role in separating the photogenic electrons and holes and prolonging their lifetime86,87. This feature is in line with the findings of the average electrostatic potential in Fig. S2c.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

A 3D plot of the charge density difference of the SiC/AlN heterobilayer where the red and the green indicate the areas where the charges are accumulated and depleted, respectively. The isovalue is 0.00286 e/Å3.

Strain engineering is regarded as an efficient approach for modifying the electrical, optical, as well as transport behavior of the semiconductors88. In particular, one-dimensional, and two-dimensional crystal forms can withstand much higher strain than their bulk analogues. Hence, the in-plane biaxial strain is incorporated into the SiC/AlN vdWBH to investigate how the in-plane strain influences the band configurations and the electronic band gaps of the heterostructure system. The strain has been applied to the heterostructure using the relation:

e=astrained-arelaxedarelaxed×100% 9

where astrained and arelaxed refer to the lattice constant of the heterostructure under biaxial strain and the equilibrium lattice constant, respectively while e denotes the percentage of strain applied. The strain has been applied bi-axially to the heterostructure in the range −6% to the + 6% with a step of 2%. The strained band structures of different percentages of strain are depicted in Fig. S3. Figure 7a illustrates the variation of the electronic band gap with respect to the percentage strain incorporated. Clearly, tensile strain decreases the bandgap while compressive strain increases it. Therefore, when the heterostructure is subject to tensile strain, owing to the reduction in the electronic band-gap, the heterostructure absorption profile enhances from the UV to visible spectrum and promotes photocatalytic performance. The energetic positions of the VBM and CBM when the SiC/AlN vdWBH is under biaxial strain are shown in Fig. 7b. As Fig. 7b suggests, the heterostructure ensures a favorable band alignment for the redox reaction in both neutral (pH  7) and acidic (pH  0) environments under strain in the range −6% to 6%. The location of the VBM increases while the CBM location decreases linearly upon applying the strain from −6% to the + 6%. However, the band edges are in a proper energetic position to initialize the photocatalytic redox reaction for water decomposition. This type of desired band edge alignments of the SiC/AlN heterostructure indicates strong strain tolerance of solar-energy-driven water decomposition ability.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(a) Variation of the bandgap energy of the SiC/AlN heterobilayer (AA-2 Configuration) with respect to the external biaxial strain applied to the structure. (b) Evolution of the band edge position of the heterostructure for the AA-2 configuration as a function of the varying percentages of the biaxial strain.

The absorption spectrum of the material provides insight into the optical properties of the material. Figure 8 shows the absorption profile of the SiC/AlN vdWBH. The absorption coefficient of its constituents, SiC monolayer and AlN monolayer is also included for comparison. Clearly, the SiC/AlN heterostructure shows a broad optical absorption spectrum, spanning from the UV to the near-infrared (IR) regime. In particular, the heterostructure shows a high UV absorption coefficient, reaching up to 2.16 × 105 cm−1. Furthermore, compared to the AlN monolayer, the heterostructure exhibits a substantial enhancement in optical absorption in the visible light zone. The SiC/AlN heterostructure is therefore an excellent solar irradiation absorber facilitating highly efficient photo-catalysis activity. Higher intensity and increased number of absorption points in the structure result in a higher photo-catalysis reaction and increased production of electron–hole pairs. In contrast, applying strain to the structure biaxially can cause its UV absorption profile to shift towards the visible region, allowing for a more effective deployment of the solar spectrum. We, therefore, calculated the absorption coefficient of the SiC/AlN vdWBH when the heterostructure is subject to biaxial strain. The absorption profile of the heterostructure under varying strain from −6 to + 6% is depicted in Fig. S4. Obviously, tensile strain improves the visible light absorption profile by increasing the absorption coefficient in this region. At + 6% strain, the visual absorbance is significantly enhanced compared to the unstrained structure. This is consistent with the electronic band gap values when the heterostructure is under tensile strain. In contrast, compressive strain shifts the absorption spectrum towards the UV range with the reduction in the magnitude of absorption coefficient in the visible regime. Thus, the optical performance of the SiC/AlN vdWBH can be mediated effectively through strain engineering with tensile strain improving the visible spectrum absorption of the heterojunction.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Optical absorption spectra of the SiC/AlN van der Waals heterostructure (AA-2 configuration) along with that of the free-standing SiC monolayer and the AlN monolayer.

Conclusion

The photocatalytic potential of the SiC/AlN bilayer heterostructure has been studied thoroughly in the water decomposition process by employing first-principles calculations. The SiC/AlN vdWBH possesses an inherent type-II band configuration where the VBM (CBM) is contributed by the SiC sheet (AlN sheet), promoting efficient spatial separation of the photogenic carriers. Investigation of the band alignments reveals that the heterostructure has adequately large kinetic overpotentials to provoke the redox reaction to disassociate the water into its constituents under neutral as well as acidic environments. Due to the variation in work-function values, band edge positions are altered substantially with the formation of the heterostructure. Photoexcited electrons (holes) accumulate on the AlN (SiC) layer. The oxygen production reaction and the hydrogen production reaction take place separately at the SiC layer the AlN layer, respectively. The electric field at the interface formed due to the significant amount of charge transport prevents photogenic electron–hole recombination, further improving photocatalytic performance. Ample optical absorption of the SiC/AlN heterostructure extending from the UV to the near-infrared regime indicates the strong potential of the heterostructure in solar energy harvesting water disassociation. Interestingly, strain can mediate the optical characteristics of the vdWH, with an increase in tensile strain resulting in the enhancement of the absorption profile in the visible regime. The collective outcome of these intriguing features highlights the enormous potential of the SiC/AlN vdW heterostructure in 2D excitonic photo-catalysis.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information. (548.6KB, docx)

Author contributions

N.F. performed the simulations under the supervision of M.S.I. and J.P.; M.S.I. conceived the work; J.B. and C.S. performed the data curation. All authors discussed, analyzed the data, and contributed during the writing of the manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-24663-y.

References

  • 1.Grätzel M. Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature. 2001;414:338–344. doi: 10.1038/35104607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang Z, Li C, Domen K. Recent developments in heterogeneous photocatalysts for solar-driven overall water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019;48:2109–2125. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00542G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hisatomi T, Kubota J, Domen K. Recent advances in semiconductors for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43:7520–7535. doi: 10.1039/C3CS60378D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shavorskiy A, et al. Direct mapping of band positions in doped and undoped hematite during photoelectrochemical water splitting. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017;8:5579–5586. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fujishima A, Honda K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature. 1972;238:37–38. doi: 10.1038/238037a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang G, Lan ZA, Wang X. Conjugated polymers: Catalysts for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55:15712–15727. doi: 10.1002/anie.201607375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lan Z-A, Fang Y, Zhang Y, Wang X. Photocatalytic oxygen evolution from functional triazine-based polymers with tunable band structures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018;57:470–474. doi: 10.1002/anie.201711155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sprick RS, et al. Tunable organic photocatalysts for visible-light-driven hydrogen evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:3265–3270. doi: 10.1021/ja511552k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kuriki R, et al. A stable, narrow-gap oxyfluoride photocatalyst for visible-light hydrogen evolution and carbon dioxide reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:6648–6655. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b02822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Moriya Y, Takata T, Domen K. Recent progress in the development of (oxy)nitride photocatalysts for water splitting under visible-light irradiation. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2013;257:1957–1969. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.01.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kudo A, Miseki Y. Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009;38:253–278. doi: 10.1039/B800489G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Iwashina K, Iwase A, Ng YH, Amal R, Kudo A. Z-schematic water splitting into H2 and O2 using metal sulfide as a hydrogen-evolving photocatalyst and reduced graphene oxide as a solid-state electron mediator. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:604–607. doi: 10.1021/ja511615s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Osterloh FE. Inorganic nanostructures for photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013;42:2294–2320. doi: 10.1039/C2CS35266D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang Q, Domen K. Particulate photocatalysts for light-driven water splitting: Mechanisms, challenges, and design strategies. Chem. Rev. 2020;120:919–985. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lu Q, Yu Y, Ma Q, Chen B, Zhang H. 2D transition-metal-dichalcogenide-nanosheet-based composites for photocatalytic and electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reactions. Adv. Mater. 2016;28:1917–1933. doi: 10.1002/adma.201503270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ju L, Bie M, Shang J, Tang X, Kou L. Janus transition metal dichalcogenides: A superior platform for photocatalytic water splitting. J. Phys. Mater. 2020;3:2. doi: 10.1088/2515-7639/ab7c57. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Idrees M, et al. Optoelectronic and solar cell applications of Janus monolayers and their van der Waals heterostructures. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019;21:18612–18621. doi: 10.1039/C9CP02648G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fu CF, Li X, Luo Q, Yang J. Two-dimensional multilayer M2CO2 (M = Sc, Zr, Hf) as photocatalysts for hydrogen production from water splitting: A first principles study. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2017;5:24972–24980. doi: 10.1039/C7TA08812D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang H, Liao Y, Yang G, Zhou X. Theoretical studies on the electronic and optical properties of honeycomb BC3 monolayer: A promising candidate for metal-free photocatalysts. ACS Omega. 2018;3:10517–10525. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li Y, et al. 2D g-C3N4 for advancement of photo-generated carrier dynamics: Status and challenges. Mater. Today. 2020;41:270–303. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2020.09.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cai Y, et al. Design of phosphorene for hydrogen evolution performance comparable to platinum. Chem. Mater. 2019 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b03031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shanker GS, Biswas A, Ogale S. 2D materials and their heterostructures for photocatalytic water splitting and conversion of CO2 to value chemicals and fuels. J. Phys. Energy. 2021;3:022003. doi: 10.1088/2515-7655/abdcab. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Han S, Li Y, Chai J, Wang Z. Study of the GaAs/SiH van der Waals type-II heterostructure: A high efficiency photocatalyst promoted by a built-in electric field. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020;22:8565–8571. doi: 10.1039/D0CP00139B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Su T, Shao Q, Qin Z, Guo Z, Wu Z. Role of interfaces in two-dimensional photocatalyst for water splitting. ACS Catal. 2018;8:2253–2276. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b03437. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Deng D, et al. Catalysis with two-dimensional materials and their heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016;11:218–230. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lou P, Lee JY. GeC/GaN vdW heterojunctions: A promising photocatalyst for overall water splitting and solar energy conversion. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12:14289–14297. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b20175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang Y, et al. Visible light driven type II heterostructures and their enhanced photocatalysis properties: A review. Nanoscale. 2013;5:8326–8339. doi: 10.1039/c3nr01577g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li Q, Xu L, Luo KW, Wang LL, Li XF. SiC/MoS2 layered heterostructures: Promising photocatalysts revealed by a first-principles study. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018;216:64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.05.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ran J, et al. Metal-free 2D/2D phosphorene/g-C3N4 van der Waals heterojunction for highly enhanced visible-light photocatalytic H2 production. Adv. Mater. 2018;30:18000128. doi: 10.1002/adma.201800128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sheng W, et al. The InSe/SiH type-II van der Waals heterostructure as a promising water splitting photocatalyst: A first-principles study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020;22:21436–21444. doi: 10.1039/D0CP03831H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Idrees M, et al. Van der Waals heterostructures of SiC and Janus MSSe (M = Mo, W) monolayers: A first principles study. RSC Adv. 2020;10:25801–25807. doi: 10.1039/D0RA04433D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yang Q, et al. AlN/BP heterostructure photocatalyst for water splitting. IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 2017;38:145–148. doi: 10.1109/LED.2016.2633487. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li, H., Zhang, H., Xiong, Y., Ye, L. & Li, W. Van der Waals heterostructures based on SiC-BS: A promoted photocatalytic properties for water splitting. Phys. Lett. Sect. A Gen. At. Solid State Phys.410, 127514 (2021).
  • 34.Yang Q, et al. Considering the spin-orbit coupling effect on the photocatalytic performance of AlN/MX2 nanocomposites. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2017;5:9412–9420. doi: 10.1039/C7TC02461D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Peng B, et al. Layer-dependent photocatalysts of GaN/SiC-based multilayer van der Waals heterojunctions for hydrogen evolution. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2021;11:3059–3069. doi: 10.1039/D0CY02251A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Islam MR, et al. Superior tunable photocatalytic properties for water splitting in two dimensional GeC/SiC van der Waals heterobilayers. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97251-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liao J, Sa B, Zhou J, Ahuja R, Sun Z. Design of high-efficiency visible-light photocatalysts for water splitting: MoS2/AlN(GaN) heterostructures. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2014;118:17594–17599. doi: 10.1021/jp5038014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang G, et al. A two-dimensional h-BN/C2N heterostructure as a promising metal-free photocatalyst for overall water-splitting. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020;22:24446–24454. doi: 10.1039/D0CP03925J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang G, et al. A two-dimensional CdO/CdS heterostructure used for visible light photocatalysis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020;22:9587–9592. doi: 10.1039/D0CP00876A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bekaroglu E, Topsakal M, Cahangirov S, Ciraci S. First-principles study of defects and adatoms in silicon carbide honeycomb structures. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010;81:1–9. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.075433. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang P, Xiao BB, Hou XL, Zhu YF, Jiang Q. Layered SiC sheets: A potential catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:1–8. doi: 10.1038/srep03821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lin X, Lin S, Xu Y, Chen H. Electronic structures of multilayer two-dimensional silicon carbide with oriented misalignment. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2015;3:9057–9062. doi: 10.1039/C5TC01679G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shi Z, Zhang Z, Kutana A, Yakobson BI. Predicting two-dimensional silicon carbide monolayers. ACS Nano. 2015;9:9802–9809. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b02753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Presser V, Berthold C, Wirth R, Nickel KG. Structural characterisation of tribologically influenced silicon carbide ceramic surfaces. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2008;12:73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cossms.2009.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Geng D, Hu J, Fu W, Ang LK, Yang HY. Graphene-induced in situ growth of monolayer and bilayer 2D SiC crystals toward high-temperature electronics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019;11:39109–39115. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b14069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Şahin H, et al. Monolayer honeycomb structures of group-IV elements and III–V binary compounds: First-principles calculations. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2009;80:1–12. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.155453. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ben J, et al. 2D III-nitride materials: Properties, growth, and applications. Adv. Mater. 2021;33:2006761. doi: 10.1002/adma.202006761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lin SS. Light-emitting two-dimensional ultrathin silicon carbide. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012;116:3951–3955. doi: 10.1021/jp210536m. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chabi S, Chang H, Xia Y, Zhu Y. From graphene to silicon carbide: Ultrathin silicon carbide flakes. Nanotechnology. 2016;27:075602. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/7/075602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chabi S, Guler Z, Brearley AJ, Benavidez AD, Luk TS. The creation of true two-dimensional silicon carbide. Nanomaterials. 2021;11:1–10. doi: 10.3390/nano11071799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Nepal N, Anderson VR, Hite JK, Eddy CR. Growth and characterization of III-N ternary thin films by plasma assisted atomic layer epitaxy at low temperatures. Thin Solid Films. 2015;589:47–51. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.04.068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Alizadeh M, Goh BT, Rahman SA. Controlled growth of conductive AlN thin films by plasma-assisted reactive evaporation. Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 2017;48:3461–3469. doi: 10.1007/s11661-017-4103-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kresse G, Furthmuller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B. 1996;54:11169–11186. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kresse G, Hafner J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metalamorphous- semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B. 1994;49:14251–14269. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Blöchl PE. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B. 1994;50:17953–17979. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Klimeš J, Bowler DR, Michaelides A. Chemical accuracy for the van der Waals density functional. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2010;22:022201. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/2/022201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Klime J, Bowler DR, Michaelides A. Van der Waals density functionals applied to solids. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2011;83:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B. 1976;13:5188–5192. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lucarini, V., Saarinen, J. J., Peiponen, K. E. & Vartiainen, E. Kramers-Kronig Relations in Optical Materials Research. 27–47. 10.1007/3-540-27316-6_6 (Springer, 2005).
  • 60.Gajdoš M, Hummer K, Kresse G, Furthmüller J, Bechstedt F. Linear optical properties in the projector-augmented wave methodology. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2006;73:1–9. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.045112. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hoat DM, et al. Transition from indirect to direct band gap in SiC monolayer by chemical functionalization: A first principles study. Superlattices Microstruct. 2020;137:106320. doi: 10.1016/j.spmi.2019.106320. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Beshkova M, Yakimova R. Properties and potential applications of two-dimensional AlN. Vacuum. 2020;176:109231. doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109231. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wang S, et al. First-principles calculations of aluminium nitride monolayer with chemical functionalization. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019;481:1549–1553. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Islam MS, et al. Molecular dynamics study of thermal transport in single-layer silicon carbide nanoribbons. AIP Adv. 2020;10:015117. doi: 10.1063/1.5131296. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Islam ASMJ, Islam MS, Ferdous N, Park J, Hashimoto A. Vacancy-induced thermal transport in two-dimensional silicon carbide: A reverse non-equilibrium molecular dynamics study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020;22:13592–13602. doi: 10.1039/D0CP00990C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ahammed S, Islam MS, Mia I, Park J. Lateral and flexural thermal transport in stanene/2D-SiC Van Der Waals heterostructure. Nanotechnology. 2020;31:505702. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/abb491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Islam ASMJ, et al. Anomalous temperature dependent thermal conductivity of two-dimensional silicon carbide. Nanotechnology. 2019;30:445707. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/ab3697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Rashid AS, et al. Widely tunable electronic properties in graphene/two-dimensional silicon carbide van der Waals heterostructures. J. Comput. Electron. 2019;18:836–845. doi: 10.1007/s10825-019-01351-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ferdous N, Islam MS, Park J, Hashimoto A. Tunable electronic properties in stanene and two dimensional silicon-carbide heterobilayer: A first principles investigation. AIP Adv. 2019;9:025210. doi: 10.1063/1.5066029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Islam MR, Islam MS, Ferdous N, Anindya KN, Hashimoto A. Spin–orbit coupling effects on the electronic structure of two-dimensional silicon carbide. J. Comput. Electron. 2019;18:407–414. doi: 10.1007/s10825-019-01326-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Islam MS, Mojumder MRH, Ferdous N, Park J. Germanene/2D-SiC van der Waals heterobilayer: Structural features and tunable electronic properties. Mater. Today Commun. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101718. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hu J, et al. A promising strategy to tune the Schottky barrier of a MoS2(1–x)Se2x/graphene heterostructure by asymmetric Se doping. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2019;7:7798–7805. doi: 10.1039/C9TC01873E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ren K, Luo Y, Yu J, Tang W. Theoretical prediction of two-dimensional ZnO/GaN van der Waals heterostructure as a photocatalyst for water splitting. Chem. Phys. 2020;528:110539. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2019.110539. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Pyykkö P, Atsumi M. Molecular single-bond covalent radii for elements 1–118. Chem. Eur. J. 2009;15:186–197. doi: 10.1002/chem.200800987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Björkman T, Gulans A, Krasheninnikov AV, Van der Nieminen RM. Waals bonding in layered compounds from advanced density-functional first-principles calculations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;108:1–5. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.235502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Chen X, Tian F, Persson C, Duan W, Chen NX. Interlayer interactions in graphites. Sci. Rep. 2013;3:1–5. doi: 10.1038/srep03046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Nguyen C, Hoang NV, Phuc HV, Sin AY, Nguyen CV. Two-dimensional boron phosphide/MoGe2N4van der Waals heterostructure: A promising tunable optoelectronic material. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021;12:5076–5084. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.He Y, et al. Two-dimensional g-C3N4/InSe heterostructure as a novel visible-light photocatalyst for overall water splitting: A first-principles study. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2019;52:015314. doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aae67d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Liu J. Origin of high photocatalytic efficiency in monolayer g-C3N4/CdS heterostructure: A hybrid DFT study. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2015;119:28417–28423. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b09092. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Liu J, Hua E. Electronic structure and absolute band edge position of tetragonal AgInS2 photocatalyst: A hybrid density functional study. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2015;40:446–452. doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2015.07.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Shenoy S, Tarafder K. Enhanced photocatalytic efficiency of layered CdS/CdSe heterostructures: Insights from first principles electronic structure calculations. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2020;32:275501. doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/ab7b1c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mulliken RS. A new electroaffinity scale; Together with data on valence states and on valence ionization potentials and electron affinities. J. Chem. Phys. 1934;2:782–793. doi: 10.1063/1.1749394. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Mulliken RS. Electronic structures of molecules XI. Electroaffinity, molecular orbitals and dipole moments. J. Chem. Phys. 1935;3:573–585. doi: 10.1063/1.1749731. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Putz MV, Russo N, Sicilia E. About the Mulliken electronegativity in DFT. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2005;114:38–45. doi: 10.1007/s00214-005-0641-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Heyd J, Scuseria GE, Ernzerhof M. Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential. J. Chem. Phys. 2003;118:8207–8215. doi: 10.1063/1.1564060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Wang S, Tian H, Ren C, Yu J, Sun M. Electronic and optical properties of heterostructures based on transition metal dichalcogenides and graphene-like zinc oxide. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:6–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30614-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kumar R, Das D, Singh AK. C2N/WS2 van der Waals type-II heterostructure as a promising water splitting photocatalyst. J. Catal. 2018;359:143–150. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.01.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Dong MM, He C, Zhang WX. A tunable and sizable bandgap of a g-C3N4/graphene/g-C3N4 sandwich heterostructure: a van der Waals density functional study. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2017;5:3830–3837. doi: 10.1039/C7TC00386B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information. (548.6KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES