Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2022 Nov 23;30(1):71–84. doi: 10.1007/s10140-022-02097-3

Imaging patterns of thoracic injuries in survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV)

Babina Gosangi 1, Andrew Wong 2, Rahul Gujrathi 2, Hyesun Park 2, Richard Thomas 3, Annie Lewis-O’Connor 4, Hanni M Stoklosa 5, Bharti Khurana 2,6,
PMCID: PMC9684831  PMID: 36418488

Abstract

Purpose

To recognize the imaging patterns of thoracic injuries in survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV).

Materials and methods

A retrospective radiological review of 688 patients self-reporting IPV to our institution’s violence intervention and prevention program between January 2013 and June 2018 identified 30 patients with 89 thoracic injuries. Imaging and demographic data were collected.

Results

Thirty survivors with 89 injuries to the thorax were identified with a median age of 43.5 years (21–65 years). IPV was reported or disclosed as the direct cause of injury in 50% (15/30) of survivors, including all nine patients who sustained penetrating injuries. The most common injury type was fracture (72%, 64/89) with 52 rib, 3 sternal, 2 clavicular, and 7 vertebral fractures. There were 3 acromioclavicular dislocations. Among rib fractures, right lower anterior rib fractures (9–12 ribs) were the most common(30%, 16/52). There were 10 superficial soft tissue injuries. There were 12 deep tissue injuries which included 2 lung contusions, 2 pneumomediastinum, 7 pneumothoraces, 1 hemothorax. One third of patients had concomitant injuries of other organ systems, most commonly to the head and face, followed by extremities and one third of patients had metachronous injuries.

Conclusion

Acute rib fractures with concomitant injuries to the head, neck, face, and extremities with an unclear mechanism of injury should prompt the radiologist to discuss the possibility of IPV with the ordering physician.

Advances in knowledge

Recognizing common injuries to the thorax will prompt the radiologists to suspect IPV and discuss it with the clinicians.

Keywords: Intimate partner violence, Chest injuries, Domestic abuse, Domestic violence, Thoracic injuries, Fractures

Introduction

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a prevalent and preventable public health problem. One in 5 (29 million women), and 1 in 7 (16 million men) in the USA have experienced severe physical violence from an intimate partner during their lifetime [1]. The spectrum of observed injuries from IPV range from mild abrasions to severe multisystem injuries which could lead to death [2]. Injuries from IPV can progress in frequency and severity over a period of time, occasionally resulting in homicides [3]. The morbidity and mortality associated with IPV highlights the urgency of early identification and intervention because each year more than 50% of homicides in women in the USA alone occur in the hands of their intimate partner or a family member [4]. IPV-related injuries burden the healthcare system and increase healthcare costs. In comparison to age-matched controls, IPV-related injuries lead to a tenfold increase in the rate of hospitalization [5, 6]. Survivors of IPV make greater use of healthcare resources. In terms of appointments with outpatient and inpatient providers, mental health or substance resources, or prescriptions, IPV survivors demonstrate 20% higher healthcare utilization compared to age matched controls, and healthcare expenses are 19% higher in survivors of IPV [7]. The economic cost of care for survivors of IPV is estimated to be over $100,000 per female patient, with a population economic burden of $3.6 trillion (in 2014) over an estimated prevalence of 43 million survivors [7, 8].

IPV is severely underreported, with reporting rates as low as 2.5% to 15% [9]. Survivors of IPV refuse to disclose abuse due to embarrassment, fear of retaliation, and financial dependence, while physicians in general do not broadly and routinely apply screening tools for IPV [10]. Healthcare providers can play a crucial role in identifying IPV and studies have shown that IPV detection rates improve when healthcare personnel are offered training in IPV [11]. Recent studies have explored the role of radiologists in identifying IPV-related injuries [12, 13].

The most commonly reported injuries in survivors of IPV involve the head, face, and neck which represent easily accessible target sites [14]. Musculoskeletal injuries, particularly of the upper extremities, are the second most common type of injuries, often indicating defensive injuries [1416]. Injuries to the torso (thorax and abdomen) are the least frequent IPV-related injuries and most likely represent target injuries [2, 14]. In terms of specific breakdown of injury pattern rates, Loder et al., demonstrated that facial injuries were the most common (58.7%), followed by extremities (22.3%), and upper trunk (11.3%) without any discrete details on the specific organ or bone involvement [14]. Increased injuries to the thorax were reported during the COVID-19 pandemic where abusers and survivors were trapped under the same roof due to shelter-in-place orders [13]. Prior studies have explored injuries of the head, neck, face, and extremities; however, no extant studies describe IPV-related injuries to the thorax. In our study, we describe radiologic patterns of thoracic injuries seen in survivors of IPV.

Methods

Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained and the study was Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant. This retrospective analysis was conducted in a large academic medical center in the Northeast USA with a dedicated domestic violence intervention and prevention program.

Study cohort

The institution’s domestic violence prevention and intervention program provided a list of patients reporting physical IPV from June 2013 to June 2018. Of 1248 patients, 668 patients had radiological studies that were analyzed for injuries. Four emergency radiology fellows reviewed radiology reports and coded them for injuries of the thorax (injuries extending from the thoracic inlet to diaphragms). A note was made of synchronous and non-synchronous injuries to the head, face, abdomen, upper extremity, lower extremity, cervical spine, and lumbar spine. Radiographs, ultrasounds, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fluoroscopic imaging, nuclear medicine imaging, and other less commonly used modalities such as bone densitometry and angiograms were analyzed. An emergency radiology fellow with thoracic radiology subspecialty training then reviewed all radiological studies with thoracic injuries. Of 288 patients, 30 patients had sustained 89 thoracic injuries.

Analysis of thoracic injuries

Injuries were descriptively analyzed based on location—lung, pleura, mediastinum, vessels, bones, and soft tissues. Fractures were categorized by location—ribs, sternum, scapulae, clavicles, and thoracic vertebrae. Rib fractures were further categorized numerically as upper (1–4), middle (5–8), and lower (9–12); laterality (left or right); facing (anterior or posterior); and chronicity (acute or chronic) [17]. An imaginary line was drawn parallel to the anterior border of the vertebral body and rib fractures anterior to this line were considered as anterior rib fractures and rib fractures posterior to this line were classified as posterior rib fractures [17]. A rib fracture was considered non-displaced when there was partial or complete cortical disruption with alignment maintained. A rib fracture was considered displaced when the alignment was disrupted with overlapping of fractured fragments [18]. Clavicle fractures were considered displaced if there was half shaft width displacement and comminuted when broken into three or more fragments. Soft tissue injuries were categorized based on the laterality, site of injury, and pattern of injury (soft tissue swelling, laceration, hematoma, gunshot wounds, and stab wounds). Injuries were also analyzed for chronicity as acute or chronic/indeterminate age.

Other radiological studies from the same day were reviewed to identify synchronous injuries at other sites. Radiological studies preceding and following the current study were reviewed to identify injuries occurring prior to and after the index episode of abuse. A note was made of recurrent injuries occurring at the same site at different points of time. The same finding seen on repeat studies was not included as a separate finding. Patient charts were reviewed to identify demographic information such as age, sex, race, ethnicity, zip code (to calculate median household income), and marital status. Other relevant information such as the reported mode of injury and reporting of IPV at the time of injury was extracted from the electronic medical records.

Results

Demographics

Thirty survivors of IPV were found to have 89 thoracic injuries, of which the majority were women (87%, 26/30). The median age of the cohort was 43.5 years (21–65 years). Most of the survivors were white (47%, 14/30), followed by African American (30%, 9/30), Hispanic (13%, 4/30), and Asian ethnicity (7%, 2/30). Substance use disorder was documented in 23% (7/30) survivors. Psychiatric issues were documented in 30% (9/30) survivors. Please refer to Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographics and pattern of acute and chronic injuries in survivors of IPV

Parameter IPV survivors with acute injuries (n = 25) Survivors with chronic or age indeterminate injuries (n = 5) Total (n = 30)
Number of injuries 60 29 89
No. of fractures 35 29 64
Age (years)* 44.5 (21–65) 37 (22–50) 43.5 (21–65)
Sex
  Female 21 5 26 (87%)
  Male 4 0 4 (13%)
Race
  White 11 3 14 (47%)
  African American 9 0 9 (30%)
  Hispanic 2 2 4 (13%)
  Asian 2 0 2 (7%)
  Others 1 0 1 (3%)
IPV history
  IPV reported 15 0 15 (50%)
  Screened for IPV 21 0 21 (70%)
Psychiatry history
  Yes 6 3 9 (30%)
Substance abuse
  Yes 6 1 7 (23%)
Mechanism of Injury based on patient reporting
  IPV 15 0 15 (50%)
  Fall 1 1 2 (7%)
  MVC 1 0 1 (3%)
  Other 8 4 12 (40%)
Pattern of chest injuries
Fractures
  Ribs 24 28 52
  Sternum 2 1 3
  Clavicle 2 0 2
  Thoracic vertebrae 7 0 7
Subluxations
  Acromioclavicular joint subluxation 3 0 3
Lung and pleura injuries
  Lung contusion 2 0 2
  Pneumothorax 7 0 7
  Hemothorax 1 0 1
Mediastinal injuries
  Pneumomediastinum 2 0 2
Soft tissue injuries
  Left anterior chest wall stab injury 5 0 5
  Right anterior chest wall stab injury 3 0 3
  Right anterolateral chest wall stab injury 1 0 1
  Right breast laceration 1 0 1

IPV reporting

IPV was reported as the mechanism of injury by 50% (15/30) survivors, and IPV screening was performed in 70% (21/30) survivors.

Injuries on imaging

There were 89 thoracic injuries, of which 67 were bone injuries (Fig. 1), 12 were visceral organ injuries, and 10 were soft tissue injuries. The majority of the thoracic injuries were right-sided (42%, 37/89), followed by left sided (29%, 26/89), midline injuries (13%, 12/89), and bilateral injuries (16%, 14/89). Chronic injuries were seen in 33% patients (29/89) and included 28 rib fractures and 1 sternal fracture.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Graph depicting distribution of fractures in thorax of survivors of intimate partner violence based on the bones involved

Rib fractures

A total of 52 rib fractures were identified. Acute rib fractures were seen in 57% (17/30) survivors, with a total of 24 acute rib fractures. Lower ribs were the most common site of acute rib fractures (71%, 17/24), followed by middle rib fractures (29%, 7/24). Right rib fractures (67%, 16/24) were more common than left rib fractures (33%, 8/24). Anterior rib fractures (75%, 18/24) were more common than posterior rib fractures (25%, 6/24). Most fractures were nondisplaced (83%, 20/24).

Acute rib fractures were associated with organ injuries. One survivor with acute bilateral 12th rib fractures had concurrent splenic laceration, another survivor with acute right 5th and 6th rib fractures had simultaneous right pneumothorax, and the third survivor with acute right 9th and 10th rib fractures had concurrent left hemothorax.

Injuries to the head, face, and neck were subsequently seen in 32% (8/25) survivors with acute rib fractures. Survivors with acute rib fractures presented subsequently with deep injuries such as subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural hemorrhage, left frontal bone fracture, supraspinous ligament tear, splenic laceration, and abdominal wall hematoma.

Chronic rib fractures were seen in 43% (13/30) survivors, with a total of 28 chronic rib fractures. A similar pattern of distribution was seen as acute rib fractures with a predominance of lower rib fractures (57%, 16/28) and anterior rib fractures (71%, 20/28). The same number of chronic rib fractures were seen bilaterally (50%, 14/28, right = left) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Axial chest CT images in a 45-year-old woman with IPV with acute on chronic rib fractures. A Mildly displaced fracture of the right anterior seventh rib (white arrow). B Old fracture of the right anterior fourth rib (thin arrow). C Old fracture of the left anterior fifth rib (thin arrow)

Overall, rib fractures were most commonly seen in the right lower anterior ribs (30%, 16/52).

Other fractures and dislocations

Mildly displaced clavicular fractures were seen in 7% (2/30) of survivors. One survivor with left clavicular fracture reported IPV at the time of clavicular fracture, and subsequently suffered a penetrating injury to the neck.

Sternal fractures were seen in 10% (3/30) of survivors. One sternal fracture was chronic, while two were acute, and both were disclosed at the time of presentation. One survivor with acute sternal fracture had concurrent thoracic vertebral fractures and subsequently experienced stab injury to the abdomen.

Thoracic vertebral fractures were seen in 10% (3/30) of survivors, with a total of 7 fractures. One survivor with thoracic vertebral fractures, who reported IPV at the time of presentation, had subsequent scalp laceration and abdominal wall penetrating injury with hematoma.

Acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) subluxations were seen in 10% (3/30) of survivors, all of them reported IPV at the time of presentation, 2/3 on the left. All three survivors had subsequent scalp lacerations and one survivor with left ACJ subluxation had subsequent injury to cervical spinous ligament (supraspinous ligament) and L2 fracture.

Lung injuries

Lung contusions were seen in 7% (2/30) of survivors (Fig. 3). Both were due to stabbing related to IPV, one of which was with a kitchen knife. Both were associated with pneumothorax, simultaneous injuries to the chest wall and multiple other sites in the body, with one survivor demonstrating numerous penetrating injuries to the neck and abdomen including laceration to the liver and fracture of the mandible.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Axial chest images in a 38-year-old woman with IPV with multiple penetrating injuries. A Linear air track in the left anterior chest wall consistent with a penetrating stab injury (black arrow). Also seen in a left apical pneumothorax (thin black arrow). B Emphysema in the left axillary region (black arrow). Also seen is left apical pneumothorax (thin arrow). Focal consolidation in the left lung apex adjacent to the pneumothorax is consistent with lung contusion (white arrow). C Pneumoperitoneum in the abdomen (black arrows)

Pleural injuries

Pneumothoraces were seen in 23% (7/30) of survivors. Of these, 85% (6/7) were the result of penetrating injury, and all survivors disclosed IPV at time of presentation. Hemothorax was seen in 3% (1/30) of survivors (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Axial chest images in a 43-year-old woman with IPV with multiple penetrating injuries. A Subcutaneous emphysema in the left neck consistent with penetrating injury (black arrow). B, C Right pneumothorax (black arrow). D Focal hemothorax in the right upper anterior pleura (white arrow). Also note active extravasation of contrast

Mediastinal injuries

Pneumomediastinum was seen in 7% (2/30) of survivors, and both cases were due to stab injuries from IPV.

Soft tissue injuries

Soft tissue injuries of the thorax were seen in 33% (10/30) of survivors, with a total of 10 injuries resulting from stabbing. The most common location for soft tissue injury of the chest was the left anterior chest wall (50%, 5/10), followed by the right anterior chest wall (30%, 3/10), right anterolateral chest wall (10%, 1/10), and right breast (10%, 1/10).

Stab/penetrating injuries

Penetrating injuries were seen in 30% (9/30) of survivors, 67% (6/9) survivors were women, and a kitchen knife was used in 67% (6/9) of survivors. All 9 survivors disclosed that the injuries resulted from IPV. Penetrating injuries resulted in pneumothorax in 6 survivors, lung contusion in 2 survivors, and pneumomediastinum in 2 survivors. Penetrating injuries involved multiple locations in 6 survivors resulting in deep injuries such as splenic laceration in 1 survivor and liver laceration in 1 survivor.

Synchronous injuries

Synchronous injuries were seen in 33% (10/30) of survivors with a total of 28 synchronous injuries, most commonly in the head, neck, and face (39%, 11/28) of which there were 2 mandible fractures, 1 maxilla fracture, 1 common carotid artery dissection, and 7 soft tissue injuries (6 were penetrating wounds). There were 4 abdominal injuries which included 1 liver laceration, 1 splenic laceration, 1 hemoperitoneum due to bowel injury, and 1 soft tissue injury to the abdominal wall (penetrating wound). There were 6 upper extremity injuries with 1 isolated ulnar fracture, and 5 soft tissue injuries (penetrating wounds). There were 7 lower extremity injuries with 1 isolated ankle fracture and 6 soft tissue injuries (penetrating wounds). Please refer to Table 2.

Table 2.

Case wise demographic information, synchronous, preceding and subsequent injuries in survivors with acute chest injuries

Parameter, N = 25 Age Sex IPV reporting IPV screening Mechanism of injury Thoracic injuries Concomitant injuries Preceding injuries Subsequent injuries
Victim 1 48 Male Yes No IPV Bilateral 9th and 10th rib fractures

1. Subdural hemorrhage

2. Soft tissue hemorrhage of the left side of the scalp

3. Soft tissue swelling in the left elbow

4. Fifth left metacarpal bone fracture

Victim 2 49 Female Yes No None Bilateral 8th, 9th, 10th rib fractures Distal phalanx of thumb fracture
Victim 3 42 Female Yes No Fall Left 10th rib fracture Distal phalanx of the right thumb fracture Soft tissue injuries of head and face
Victim 4 65 Female Yes Yes IPV

1. Bilateral 12th rib fractures

2. Sternum fracture

3. Left chest wall stab injuries

Splenic laceration Left posterior 10th rib fracture

1. Left frontal bone fracture

2. Subdural hemorrhage

3. Left posterior 11th rib fracture

4. Right lower 10th rib fracture

5. Splenic laceration

Victim 5 42 Female Yes No Fall Bilateral 10th rib fractures

1. Soft tissue swelling of the scalp

2. Left posterior 9th rib fracture

Victim 6 58 Female Yes No None

1. Right 8th rib fracture

2. Right ACJ subluxation

1. Hematoma of the face

2. Soft tissue swelling of the ankle

Victim 7 43 Female Yes Yes None Left 10th rib fracture

1. Hematoma of the face

2. Soft tissue swelling of the ankle

Victim 8 44 Female Yes No None

1. T5 fracture

2. T9 fracture

3. T10 fracture

1. Soft tissue swelling of the right ankle

2. Soft tissue swelling of the scalp

Distal phalanx of thumb fracture
Victim 9 33 Female Yes No None Left ACJ subluxation

1. Soft tissue swelling of the left side of face

2. Fracture of the proximal phalanx of the left thumb

1. Laceration of the scalp

2. Lateral malleolar fracture

Victim 10 45 Female Yes Yes None

1. Left 10th rib fracture

2. Left ACJ subluxation

1. Cervical spine ligament tear (supraspinous)

2. L3 fracture

3. T12 fracture

Victim 11 40 Female Yes Yes IPV

1. Right lung contusion

2. Right pneumothorax

3. Right chest wall stab injury

1. Stab injuries to the bilateral upper extremities

2. Stab injuries to the bilateral lower extremities

Victim 12 49 Female Yes Yes IPV

1. Right pneumothorax

2. Pneumomediastinum

3. Right chest wall stab injury

1. Stab injuries to the neck

2. Stab injuries to the face

3. Stab injuries to the bilateral upper extremities

4. Stab injuries to the bilateral lower extremities

Victim 13 58 Female Yes Yes IPV Right 10th rib fracture

1. Sub-dural hemorrhage

2. Sub arachnoid hemorrhage

Victim 14 51 Female Yes Yes IPV

1. T2 fracture

2. T3 fracture

3. Sternum fracture

Soft tissue swelling of the face Fracture of the left radius

1. Abdominal wall hematoma

2. Soft tissue swelling of the scalp

Victim 15 24 Male Yes Yes IPV

1. Left pneumothorax

2. Stab injury to the left chest wall

 Left thigh stab injury
Victim 16 42 Female Yes Yes IPV Stab injury to the left chest wall

1. Stab injuries to the neck

2. Stab injuries to the left thigh

3. Left ulnar fracture

4. Left forearm stab injury

Victim 17 54 Female Yes Yes IPV Stab injury to the left chest wall

1. Stab injuries to the head 

2. Stab injuries to the face

3 Stab injuries to the bilateral upper extremities

4 Stab injuries to the bilateral ower extremities

Victim 18 24 Female Yes Yes IPV Left clavicle fracture Stab injuries in the left neck
Victim 19 52 Male Yes Yes IPV

1. Right pneumothorax

2. Right chest wall stab injury

3. Right 5th, 6th rib fractures

Stab injury to the abdominal wall

1. Soft tissue swelling of the scalp

2. Soft tissue swelling of the left elbow

3. Soft tissue swelling of the left ankle

Soft tissue swelling of the scalp
Victim 20 21 Female Yes Yes IPV Right pneumothorax

1. Fracture of the left mandible

2. Fracture of the left maxilla

3. Left common carotid artery dissection

Victim 21 31 Female Yes Yes IPV

1. Right lung contusion

2. Right pneumothorax

3. Pneumomediastinum

4. Stab injury to right chest wall

5. Right breast laceration

1. Left mandible fracture

2. Stab injuries to the neck

3. Liver laceration

4. Hemoperitoneum

5. Soft tissue swelling of left elbow

6. Soft tissue swelling of left knee

Victim 22 51 Male No Yes IPV

1. Left pneumothorax

2. Left chest wall stab injury

Victim 23 57 Female No No None

1. T8 fracture

2. T12 fracture

1. Trimalleolar fracture of the right ankle

1. Laceration of the scalp

2. Fracture of the left nasal bone

3. Fracture of the left zygomatic arch

4. Fracture of the left thryoid cornua

1. Soft tissue swelling of the scalp

2. Soft tissue swelling of the left elbow

Victim 24 64 Female No No IPV

1. Right hemothorax

2. Right 9th, 10th rib fractures

1. Soft tissue swelling of the right ankle

2. Fracture of the left radius

3. Fracture of the left zygomatic bone

Victim 25 35 Female No No None

1. Right 9th rib fracture

2. Right clavicle fracture

Non-synchronous injuries

Preceding injuries

Preceding injuries were seen in 30% (9/30) of survivors, with a total of 21 preceding injuries. The most common site of preceding injuries was the head, face, and neck (48%, 10/21) with 2 zygomatic bone fractures, 1 nasal bone fracture, 1 thyroid cornual fracture, 1 subdural hemorrhage, and 5 soft tissue injuries. Upper extremity injuries were the second most common type of injuries, followed by lower extremity injuries. Extremity fractures included 1 radius fracture, 1 fifth metacarpal bone fracture, and 1 fracture of the distal phalanx of left great toe.

Subsequent injury

Subsequent injuries were seen in 50% (15/30) of survivors. Of a total of 27 injuries seen, most of these injuries involved head, neck, and face (48%, 13/27). Additionally seen were deep injuries such as subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural hemorrhage, frontal bone fracture, stab injury to the neck, and splenic laceration. All the survivors with deep injuries had disclosed a history of IPV at the time of their presentation with thoracic injuries. Please refer to Table 3.

Table 3.

Synchronous and non-synchronous injuries in survivors of IPV

Synchronous injuries N = 28
Head, neck, and face 11
  Mandible fracture 2
  Maxilla fracture 1
  Common carotid artery dissection 1
  Soft tissue injuries 7
    Stabs 6
    Contusions 1
Abdomen 4
  Liver laceration 1
  Splenic laceration 1
  Pneumoperitoneum following bowel injury 1
  Soft tissue injuries (stabs) 1
Upper extremity 6
  Ulna fracture 1
  Soft tissue injuries (stabs) 5
Lower extremity 7
  Ankle fracture 1
  Soft tissue injuries (stabs) 6
Preceding injuries N = 21
Head, neck, and face 10
  Zygomatic bone fracture 2
  Nasal bone fracture 1
  Thyroid cornua fracture 1
  Intracranial hemorrhage (SDH) 1
  Soft tissue injuries 5
Chest 1
  Rib fracture 1
Upper extremity 7
  Radius fracture 2
  Metacarpal fracture (fifth MCP)  1
  Thumb 2
  Soft tissue injuries 2
Lower extremity 3
  Soft tissue injuries 3
Subsequent injuries N = 27
Head, neck, and face 13
  Frontal bone fracture 1
  Intracranial injuries 3
  Soft tissue injuries 9
Abdomen 2
  Splenic laceration 1
  Soft tissue injury (stab) 1
Chest 3
  Rib fracture 3
Upper extremity 3
  Phalangeal fracture 2
  Soft tissue injury 1
Lower extremity 3
  Ankle fracture 1
  Soft tissue injury 2
Spine 3
  Cervical spine ligamentous injury 1
  Thoracic vertebra fracture (T12) 1
  Lumbar vertebra fracture (L3) 1

Discussion

Our study analyzed 30 known IPV survivors with 89 thoracic injuries of which 87% (26/30) were women with a median age of 43.5 years (21–65 years). Based on radiological studies, bone injuries were the most common (76%, 67/89), followed by injuries to the visceral organs (13%, 11/89) and soft tissue injuries (11%, 10/89). A rib fracture was the most common injury (78%, 52/89). Amongst rib fractures, the right lower anterior ribs (9–12 ribs) were the most common location, 30% (16/52). IPV was reported at the time of injury in only 50% of survivors but almost all patients sustaining visceral and soft tissue injuries self-reported IPV. One third of all IPV patients experiencing a thoracic injury sustained penetrating injuries from their intimate partners.

Right lower anterior rib (9–12 ribs) fractures were the most common thoracic injuries in our study. A possible explanation for the predominance of lower and anterior rib fractures in survivors of IPV could be related to direct punches or kicks to the lower thorax by the perpetrator or due to falls secondary to being attacked [19, 20]. IPV survivors may protect their faces by covering them with their hands during an attack leaving the lower chest as an open target for the assailant. Most survivors in our study were women and were possibly smaller in stature than the assailants making the chest a vulnerable area to attack. Finally, the preponderance of right rib fractures could be related to the right-handed dominance of the general population as there is a tendency for a right-handed aggressor to strike the left side of the face or neck, resulting in the victim falling onto their right side against an object including the floor, resulting in right thorax injuries [21].

Furthermore, most acute rib fractures were non-displaced in our study indicating low energy of impact which is expected in IPV because injuries result from direct punches, or fall from standing and are less likely to involve high energy impact as seen in motor vehicle collisions (MVC) or fall from heights. Another interesting observation in our study was that 32% (8/25) of patients with acute rib fractures had subsequent injuries to head, neck, and face. Similar escalating pattern of subsequent injuries was also seen in survivors with acute clavicle fractures, and sternal fractures who disclosed a history of IPV when they presented with thoracic injuries [22]. Prior studies have described rib fractures in various stages of healing in survivors of IPV consistent with repeated injuries [20, 23, 24]. Recognizing suspicious patterns of rib fracture such as association with other synchronous or non-synchronous injuries may represent an opportunity to prevent subsequent escalating injury.

Seven pneumothoraces were identified in our study, of which 6 were the result of penetrating injuries to the thorax. A study by Bergaminelli et al. identified similar rates of pneumothorax in survivors of IPV [23]. One study identified repeated occurrence of pneumothoraces in survivors of IPV and recommended that healthcare providers screen for IPV when patients present with recurrent pneumothoraces in the absence of known risk factors [25].

Stab wounds/penetrating injuries to the thorax were seen in 30% of survivors, which resulted in lung contusions in 2 survivors, pneumomediastinum in 2 survivors, pneumothoraces in 6 survivors, and soft tissue injuries to the thorax in 6 survivors. All patients with penetrating injuries to the thorax disclosed IPV at the time of injury. Seven survivors were stabbed in multiple locations such as the upper and lower extremity, abdomen, neck, and face resulting in visceral injuries such as splenic and liver lacerations. Penetrating injuries are considered a severe form of abuse and are often seen in later stages of IPV or in exceptional situations where the survivors are isolated in close spaces with the perpetrator limiting their chances to escape [13]. Prior studies have identified that injuries involving different sites without a history of major trauma such as MVC are highly suspicious for IPV [2, 26]. History of injury due to a misadventure with common household items does not necessarily exonerate abuse, as most injuries in IPV are caused by the use of household objects such as knives [27]. As discussed earlier, a relatively higher proportion of left sided stab and AC joint injuries is likely related to right-handed dominance of the general population with a tendency to strike on the upper left side of the victim.

In our study, survivors with thoracic injuries had preceding injuries to the extremities, head, neck, and face and subsequent injuries to head, neck, and face and penetrating injuries to the abdomen, consistent with prior studies of IPV which demonstrated preceding injury to the extremities and ribs, and subsequent trauma to the head, neck, thorax, and abdomen [14, 28]. This finding underlines the importance of early identification of IPV prior to further violence escalation with resultant severe and life-threatening injuries.

To our best knowledge, this is the first scientific study that describes the radiologic patterns and distribution of IPV injuries in the thorax, including synchronous and non-synchronous injuries to other body parts. Prior studies of patterns and distribution of injuries in IPV have made use of forensics data, national injury databases, or ICD codes [2, 1416]. Our study directly assesses imaging data, which allows our study to examine thoracic injuries in greater depth. In addition, recent studies have explored the ability of radiologists to identify injuries from IPV [12, 13, 29]. Furthermore, in our study population, 50% of patients did not report IPV as mechanism of injury and 30% of our patients were not screened for IPV during the index presentation. These gaps point to an opportunity for radiology to contribute to the identification of patients in need of additional screening for IPV. While identification of IPV as a mechanism of severe injuries is important, in our study, all patients with penetrating injury to the chest reported IPV. The greatest opportunity for the radiologist to recognize early or occult IPV may lie with rib fractures, especially with concomitant facial and extremity injuries. Recognition of these thoracic injury patterns can allow radiologists to facilitate early identification of IPV and in turn save lives by breaking the cycle of violence [3032].

Our study has several limitations. Our patient population is drawn from a large academic medical center in the Northeast USA, and therefore, there is an inherent selection bias based on the population served by this single center. Our selection criteria included patient self-reporting of IPV to the violence prevention program, presentation to healthcare for injury, and imaging during that presentation. These factors limit generalizability, as we do not know if there are unique imaging findings or different patterns of imaging findings amongst patients who decline to self-report, those who do not seek healthcare when injured, and/or do not have imaging ordered when they experience those injuries. Our study did not include a comparison group, which might help identify bias resulting from our study population and selection parameters. Further, validation of our results should be performed with multicenter studies, which can address some of the limitations above, by broadening the study population, applying uniform screening for IPV at index presentation, and including a control group of patients suffering from accidental trauma.

Conclusion

IPV is a common public health problem causing significant socio-economic impact worldwide. Radiologists can play an important role in the identification of IPV, similar to their role in identifying non-accidental trauma in children. The greatest opportunity for the radiologist to recognize early or occult IPV may lie with rib fractures, especially those with synchronous and non-synchronous injuries to the face and extremities. Given the significant underreporting of IPV at the time of injury, knowledge and awareness of the patterns of thoracic injuries will aid radiologists in potentially saving lives by improving the identification of IPV.

Funding

The study was funded in part by: Gillian Reny Stepping Strong for Trauma Innovation, Brigham Health.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

Bharti Khurana: GE Health Care Research Grant; Section Editor Emergency Radiology, UpToDate, Wolters Kluwer; Book Author, Cambridge University Press, ROKIT health care: research consultant.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Babina Gosangi, Email: babina.gosangi@yale.edu.

Andrew Wong, Email: awong41@partners.org.

Rahul Gujrathi, Email: rgujrathi@bwh.harvard.edu.

Hyesun Park, Email: hpark29@bwh.harvard.edu.

Richard Thomas, Email: richardythms@gmail.com.

Annie Lewis-O’Connor, Email: aoconnor@bwh.harvard.edu.

Hanni M. Stoklosa, Email: hstoklosa@bwh.harvard.edu

Bharti Khurana, Email: bkhurana@bwh.harvard.edu.

References

  • 1.Breiding MJ, Smith SG, Basile KC, Walters ML, Chen J, Merrick MT. Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization in the United States—National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. MMWR. 2014;63(No. SS-8):1–18. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sheridan DJ, Nash KR. Acute injury patterns of intimate partner violence victims. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2007;8(3):281–289. doi: 10.1177/1524838007303504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Campbell JC, Lewandowski LA. Mental and physical health effects of intimate partner violence on women and children. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1997;20(2):353–374. doi: 10.1016/S0193-953X(05)70317-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Violence against women (2021) https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women. Accessed November 2022
  • 5.Kothari RU, Kothari C, DeBoer M, Koestner A. Rohs T 2014 Inpatient hospitalization and intimate partner violence: who are we treating? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77(1):129–36. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kothari CL, Rohs T, Davidson S, et al. Emergency department visits and injury hospitalizations for female and male victims and perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Adv Emrg Med. 2015;2015:1–11.
  • 7.Rivara FP, Anderson ML, Fishman P, Bonomi AE, Reid RJ, Carrell D, Thompson RS. Healthcare utilization and costs for women with a history of intimate partner violence. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(2):89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Peterson C, Kearns MC, McIntosh WL, Estefan LF, Nicolaidis C, McCollister KE, Gordon A, Florence C. Lifetime economic burden of intimate partner violence among U.S. adults. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55(4):433–444. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bachman R, Saltzman L. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report: violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned survey (NCJ154348) Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gracia E. Unreported cases of domestic violence against women: towards an epidemiology of social silence, tolerance, and inhibition. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:536–537. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.019604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McLeer SV, Anwar R. A study of battered women presenting in an emergency department. Am J Public Health. 1989;79(1):65–66. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.1.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.George E, Phillips CH, Shah N, Lewis-O'Connor A, Rosner B, Stoklosa HM, Khurana B. Radiologic findings in intimate partner violence. Radiology. 2019;291(1):62–69. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019180801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gosangi B, Park H, Thomas R, Gujrathi R, et al. Exacerbation of physical intimate partner violence during COVID-19 lockdown. Radiology. 2020;13:202866. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020202866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Loder RT, Momper L. Demographics and fracture patterns of patients presenting to US emergency departments for intimate partner violence. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020;4(2):e20.00009. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Savall F, Lechevalier A, Hérin F, Vergnault M, Telmon N, Bartoli C. A ten-year experience of physical intimate partner violence (IPV) in a French forensic unit. J Forensic Leg Med. 2017;46:12–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2016.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Katsos K, Sakelliadis EI, Zorba E, Tsitsika A, Papadodima S, Spiliopoulou C. Intimate partner violence in Greece: a study of 664 consecutive forensic clinical examinations. Fam Pract. 2020;37(6):801–806. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pines G, Gotler Y, Lazar LO, Lin G. Clinical significance of rib fractures' anatomical patterns. Injury. 2020;51(8):1812–1816. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Talbot BS, Gange CP, Jr, Chaturvedi A, Klionsky N, Hobbs SK, Chaturvedi A. Traumatic rib injury: patterns, imaging pitfalls, complications, and treatment. Radiographics. 2017;37(2):628–651. doi: 10.1148/rg.2017160100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liebsch C, Seiffert T, Vlcek M, Beer M, Huber-Lang M, Wilke HJ. Patterns of serial rib fractures after blunt chest trauma: An analysis of 380 cases. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(12):e0224105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bhandari M, Dosanjh S, Tornetta P, 3rd, Matthews D, Violence Against Women Health Research Collaborative Musculoskeletal manifestations of physical abuse after intimate partner violence. J Trauma. 2006;61(6):1473–9. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196419.36019.5a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hu WH, Shao Y, Li ZD, Zou DH, Zhang JH, Chen YJ, Wang HJ. Exploring of the mechanism of rib fracture caused by landing on different parts of the trunk after falls from height using finite element method. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020;36(2):181–186. doi: 10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2020.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Muelleman RL, Lenaghan PA, Pakieser RA. Battered women: injury locations and types. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28(5):486–492. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70110-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Spedding RL, McWilliams M, McNicholl BP, et al. Markers for domestic violence in women. Emerg Med J. 1999;16(6):400–402. doi: 10.1136/emj.16.6.400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sirmali M, Türüt H, Topçu S, Gülhan E, Yazici U, Kaya S, Taştepe I. A comprehensive analysis of traumatic rib fractures: morbidity, mortality and management. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24(1):133–138. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(03)00256-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Porter A, Montgomery CO, Montgomery BE, Eastin C, Boyette J, Snead G. intimate partner violence-related fractures in the United States: an 8 year review. J Fam Violence. 2019;34(7):601–609. doi: 10.1007/s10896-018-0007-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ananthakrishnan G, Alagappan D, Riyat M. Rib fractures in an adult male: unusual presentation of a victim of domestic violence. Injury Extra. 2006;37(11):428–429. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.05.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bergaminelli C, De Angelis P, Gauthier P, Salzano A, Vecchio G. Il drenaggio toracico nelle urgenze traumatiche [Thoracic drainage in trauma emergencies] Minerva Chir. 1999;54(10):697–702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Karangelis D, Karkos CD, Tagarakis GI, Oikonomou K, Karkos PD, Papadopoulos D, Hevas A, Tsilimingas N. Thoracic injuries resulting from intimate partner violence. J Forensic Leg Med. 2011;18(3):119–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2011.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Le BT, Dierks EJ, Ueeck BA, Homer LD, Potter BF. Maxillofacial injuries associated with domestic violence. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59(11):1277–1283. doi: 10.1053/joms.2001.27490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Reijnders UJ, van der Leden ME, de Bruin KH. Injuries due to domestic violence against women: sites on the body, types of injury and the methods of infliction. Ned Tijdschr Geneesk. 2006;150(8):429–435. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Alessandrino F, Keraliya A, Lebovic J, Mitchell Dyer GS, Harris MB, Tornetta P, 3rd, Boland GWL, Seltzer SE, Khurana B. Intimate partner violence: a primer for radiologists to make the “invisible” visible. Radiographics. 2020;40(7):2080–2097. doi: 10.1148/rg.2020200010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Matoori S, Khurana B, Balcom MC et al. Intimate partner violence crisis in the COVID-19 pandemic: how can radiologists make a difference? Eur Radiol. 2020;30(12):6933–6936. 10.1007/s00330-020-07043-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Emergency Radiology are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES