Abstract
Serological antibody tests are useful complements of nuclei acid detection for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, which can significantly improve diagnostic accuracy. However, antibody detection in serum or plasma remains challenging to do with high sensitivity. In this study, Ag nanoparticles with ultra-thin Au shells embedded with 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (MBA) (AgMBA@Au) were manufactured and then assembled onto Fe3O4 surface by electrostatic interaction to construct the Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au nanoparticles (NPs) with magnetic-Raman-colorimetric properties. Based on the composite nanoparticles, a colorimetric and Raman dual-mode lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for ultrasensitive identification of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein antibody was constructed. The magnetic nanoparticles (Fe3O4 NPs) were acted as the core and coated a layer of AgMBA@Au particles on the surface by electrostatic interaction to prepare Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au NPs, which can amplify the SERS signal due to multiple AgMBA@Au particles concentrated on a single magnetic nanoparticle. Moreover, the Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au NPs facilitated pre-purifying sample using magnetic separation, and complex matrix interference would be greatly decreased in the detection. The Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au NPs modified with N protein recognized and bound with N protein antibodies, which were trapped on the T-line, forming color band for observing detection. Under optimal conditions, the N protein antibodies could be qualitatively detected in colorimetric mode with the visual limit of 10−8 mg/mL and quantitatively detected by SERS signals between 10−6 and 10−10 mg /mL with 0.08 pg/mL detection limit. The coefficients variations (CV) of intra-assay was 8.0%, whereas of inter-assay was 11.7%, confirming of good reproducibility. Finally, this approach was able to discriminate between positive, negative, and weakly positive samples when detecting 107 clinical serum samples. The process enables highly sensitive quantitative assays that are valuable for evaluating disease processes and guiding treatment.
Graphical Abstract
Colorimetric and Raman dual-mode LFIA detection of SARS-CoV-2 N protein antibody based on Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au nanoparticles

Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00216-022-04437-1.
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2 N protein antibody, Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au NPs, LFIA, SERS, Colorimetry
Introduction
Since December 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) appeared and caused coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), spreading globally at an alarming rate. The nucleic acid detection of nasopharyngeal swabs is the gold standard to verify the infection of SARS-CoV-2 at present [1, 2]. However, the negative results obtained by this method need to be verified by several repeated detections because of its high false-negative rate. In addition to evaluating the viral nucleic acid, it has been demonstrated that detecting particular antibodies can help confirm SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially for individuals those with undetectable viral nucleic acid [3, 4].
When the virus infects human cells, the nucleocapsid (N) protein is highly expressed, which is essential for viral particle assembly. In the immunoassay for detecting SARS-CoV-2, the N protein is used as specific biomarker due to its high expression [5, 6]. Moreover, N protein is highly immunogenic; therefore, the human body produces many antibodies to it. And, an excellent association was seen between the amount of N protein antibodies in serum and the serum’s ability to neutralize the virus [7]. Furthermore, N protein-specific antibodies do not necessarily indicate S-RBD neutralizing antibodies [7]. So N protein antibody testing is an essential sign for detecting the severity SARS-CoV-2 infection, which is helpful to guide clinical treatment [8–11]. Additionally, antibody testing can detect ongoing or past infections, thereby developing effective and accurate control strategies [12].
Currently, various analytical techniques have been developed based on different platforms, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [13], microfluidic [14], chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) [15, 16], and lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) [17]. Among them, LFIA has received great attention with the distinctive virtues of being quick, simple, low-cost, portable, and friendly to users [18]. However, due to their limited sensitivity and difficulty in quantitative detection, traditional LFIAs based on gold nanoparticles may not meet present detection requirements. Besides, the single detection mode based on colorimetric results is susceptible to interference from biological environment with high background, particularly serum and plasma. Recent studies have applied colorimetric/fluorescence [19], colorimetric/luminescence [20] and colorimetric/surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) [21, 22] dual-mode analytical models to LFIA platform [4], based on colloidal gold [17], carbon nanoparticles [23], fluorescent nanoparticles [24–27], SERS-active nanomaterials [28, 29], and magnetic nanoparticles [30, 31] as the LFIA reporters.
One of these models is SERS, an ultrasensitive vibration spectroscopy technology, which has quick reaction time, excellent band resolution, and a wealth of fingerprint data. The nanotags used in SERS determine the accuracy and sensitivity of the readout signals [32, 33]. Gold and silver nanoparticles (Au and Ag NPs) are the main nanotags used for SERS-based detection of antibodies. However, they need to be combined with Raman reporter molecules to amplify the SERS signal [33, 34], which are easily disturbed by environmental interference. Typically, Au NPs are stable and biocompatible, while Ag NPs have much stronger SERS signal activity than Au NPs, yet they have a lower stability and poor surface functionalization [21, 35]. In the previous work, we used a ligand-assisted epaxial growth approach to encapsulate Ag NPs modified with 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (MBA) with an ultrathin gold shell for enhanced stability, bio-modification, and SERS performance [36]. Colorimetric and SERS modes were achieved to detect SARS-CoV-2 S protein antibody based on the AgMBA@Au NPs. Although the detection was superior to the standard colloidal gold approach, the detection limit was larger than that of gold nanostars, and especially the detection limit in serum was greater than that in PBS, suggesting interference by the complex matrix in serum.
In this study, we used magnetic nanoparticles as the core and coated a layer of AgMBA@Au particles on the surface by electrostatic interaction to prepare Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au probes with magnetic-Raman-colorimetric properties. Each Fe3O4 nanoparticle carries multiple AgMBA@Au NPs, which can greatly enhance the magnitude of the SERS signal readout. Moreover, using magnetic properties of Fe3O4 to enrich and purify the targets from the samples can effectively avoid the interference from the matrix. Then, Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au NPs conjugated with the SARS-COV-2 N protein were employed as the dual-signal colorimetric/SERS probes. Combined with LFIA platform, we developed an approach for quantification of SARS-COV-2 N protein antibodies in actual serum samples, which showed much higher sensitivity and great promise for direct use in more complicated samples such as plasma. Moreover, the Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au NPs-based LFIA enable simple and rapid detection in epidemic areas, which has the potential to be popularized to the detection of other pathogens or antibodies.
Experimental section
Reagents and samples
AgNO3, NaBH4, Na2SO3, NaOH, KH2PO4, Na2HPO4, NaCl, H2O2, FeCl3, ethylene glycol, sodium acetate, and KCl were of AR grade and used without additional purification. Trisodium citrate (TSC), L-ascorbic acid (L-AA), and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, MW = 10,000) were purchased from Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), chloroauric acid (HAuCl4), sucrose, MBA, and 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) were purchased from Energy Chemical Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). HS-(PEG)n-COOH (MW = 2000) was purchased from ToYongBio Tech. Inc. (Shanghai, China). SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, mouse anti-N protein antibody, and rabbit anti-human IgG were purchased from Sino Biological Inc. (Beijing, China). Mouse anti-Staphylococcus aureus antibody and mouse anti-Salmonella typhimurium antibody and were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA). SARS-CoV-2 N protein antibody was purchased from Abcam. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was purchased from Labgic Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Tween-20 was purchased from EKEAR Bio@Tech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Glass fiber conjugate pad, nitrocellulose membrane (NC membrane), PVC substrate, and absorbent pad were purchased from Joey-biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Serum samples were taken from the affiliated hospital of Qingdao University and stored at − 20 ℃ for use.
Instruments
A Millipore Autopure WR600A system was used to obtain ultrapure water with a purity level of 18.2 MΩ·cm. On a UV-2450 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu), Ultraviolet visible (UV–vis) absorption spectra were analyzed. The iPhone11 (Apple) was used to capture the photos. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) pictures were collected by a JEM 1400 microscope (JEOL). The Tecnai F30 microscope (Philips, FEI, TECNAI) was used for energy-dispersive X-ray elemental mapping (EDX) and high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM) investigations. The Raman scattering spectra were measured on the SR-510PRO Raman analyzer (Ocean optics). The test strips were sprayed by HGS510 (AUTOKUN) and divided by HGS210 induction cutting machine (AUTOKUN).
AgMBA@Au NPs synthesis process
The AgMBA@Au NPs were synthesized utilizing the approach from the previous study [36]. Briefly, by combining the seed-mediated growth and thermal reduction of AgNO3 with citrate in a step-wise growth procedure, the stable Ag NPs were obtained [37]. The Au shell encapsulation method used sulfites to epitaxially deposit Au onto the surface of Ag nanostructures, resulting in size-controlled Ag@Au nanospheres with excellent plasma properties and good stability, as well as endurance in SERS applications [38]. The procedure was described in extensive detail in the Supporting Information.
Preparation of Fe3O4 NPs
In a 100-mL flask, we mixed 80 mL of ethylene glycol with 2.6 g of anhydrous ferric chloride, 1.0 g of sodium citrate, and 4.0 g of sodium acetate. The solute was completely dissolved under vigorous stirring. Then, after 12 h of reaction at 200 °C, the product resulted from the mixed solution was cooled to room temperature in a 100-mL Teflon-lined reaction kettle. And, the product was washed three times in a magnetic field with ethanol and ultrapure water and vacuum-dried at 60 °C for 12 h.
Preparation of Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au NPs (MNPs)
AgMBA@Au NPs were assembled onto Fe3O4 surface by electrostatic interaction (Fig. 1a). Specifically, 0.1 g of Fe3O4 was dispersed in 10 mL of ultrapure water, followed by the addition of 50 mL hydrochloric acid (0.1 M), and the mixture ultrasonically oscillated for 10 min. The Fe3O4 NPs were washed three times with ultrapure water to remove excess hydrochloric acid and finally dispersed in 5 mL of ultrapure water. The above Fe3O4 was mixed with 45 mL of 1% PEI solution, after ultrasonic vibration for 1 h, washed three times in ultrapure water, and then redispersed in 10 mL of ultrapure water. 1 mL of the above PEI-modified Fe3O4 solution was mixed with a certain volume of AgMBA@Au solution and ultrasonically oscillated to assemble the AgMBA@Au on the Fe3O4 surface. The free AgMBA@Au NPs were washed away by magnetic separation, and the assembled product was dispersed in 10 mL of ultrapure water.
Fig. 1.
a Synthesis schematic of Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au NPs. b Diagram of the detection principle and test strip for detecting human SARS-CoV-2 N protein antibody using Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au NPs. c Interpretation of test results
Functionalization of Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au NPs
After adding 10 mL of a solution containing Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au NPs to 5.0 mL of a solution containing HS-(PEG)n-COOH (5.0 mg/mL), then the mixture was shaken vigorously for an hour at room temperature. Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au NPs were performed three washes in PBS (10 mM, pH = 6.8) by magnetic separation and then dispersed. To the above solution, following the successive addition of 100 μL of 10 mg /mL NHS and 100 μL of 20 mg /mL EDC, the resulted solution was gently shaken for 30 min at room temperature. Then, the nanoparticles were magnetically separated and washed several times with PBS before being dispersed in 1 mL of PBS with 10 μg of SARS-COV-2 N protein. The mixture was shaken vigorously for 2 h at room temperature. Subsequently, the BSA solution was added to the immunofunctionalized nanoparticles (IMNPs) and shaken on a shaker for 30 min. Finally, after washing with PBS, the obtained IMNPs were redispersed into a solution of 1% Tween-20, 1% BSA, 1% sucrose in PBS, and stored at 4 °C.
Fabrication of the LFIA strip
Wet-method LFIA is utilized to identify SARS-COV-2 N protein antibody, as illustrated in Fig. 1b. The test strip is organically assembled from five parts: nitrocellulose membrane, sample pad, binding pad, absorption pad, and PVC substrate. First, the sample pad, binding pad, absorbent pad, and nitrocellulose membrane were pasted on the PVC substrate in an overlapping manner, with an overlap of 2 mm. Then, at a rate of 1.0 μL cm−1, 1 mg/mL mouse anti-SARS-CoV-2 N protein antibody and 1 mg /mL rabbit anti-human antibody were sprayed onto the T-line and C-line, respectively. After 12 h of drying at 37 °C, the sprayed test strips were slit to a width of 3 mm and kept at 25 °C until further usage.
Detection of N protein antibody with the dual-mode LFIA in simulated serum
Serum from healthy volunteers was spiked with various amounts of SARS-CoV-2 N protein antibody to make simulated samples. Following a tenfold dilution in PBS, the samples were analyzed with dual-mode LFIA. In a centrifuge tube, after thoroughly mixing 40 μL of the SARS-CoV-2 N protein antibody with a specified quantity of the IMNPs, the final volume was adjusted to 200 μL by adding 0.01 M PBS (pH = 7.4). The mixed solution was shaken at 150 rpm on a shaker, and then the IMNPs were collected using a magnetic separator. After being washed in 0.01 M PBS (pH = 7.4), the resulting precipitate was dispersed in 100 μL of running solution (0.01 M pH = 7.4 PBS with 2% Tween-20 and 1.5% BSA) and then added to the microplate. The test strip’s sample pad was inserted into the microplate’s solution. After 20 min, the color of the T-line was visually observed for qualitative detection. And the intensity of Raman peak at 1075 cm−1 was measured using portable Raman spectrometer equipped with a 785 nm laser for quantitative detection.
Application to clinical samples
Blood samples from 9 unvaccinated and 98 vaccinated volunteers were stored overnight and centrifuged at 1000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C and then detected. Before being analyzed with this abovementioned protocol, the samples were diluted tenfold with PBS.
Results and discussion
Dual-mode LFIA principle for detecting SARS-CoV-2 N protein antibody
The detection method is shown in Fig. 1b. The IMNPs are added to the serum samples to bind with N protein antibody via antigen–antibody interaction, and then magnetic separation is used to eliminate interference from other matrices (such as other antibodies in serum and proteins) in the serum sample. Following magnetic separation, the immune complexes were redispersed and transferred onto the test strip sample pad, which were caught by the rabbit anti-human antibodies on the T-line, resulting a colorful band. For quality control, the mouse anti- SARS-CoV-2 N protein antibody captured free nanomaterials onto the C-line. As shown in Fig. 1c, the visual-based colorimetric detection mode shows that two obvious dark-gray bands on the T- and C-lines for positive samples and only one band on the C-line for negative samples, while the others were invalid. A portable Raman spectrometer could be used to measure the SERS signal for quantitative detection. The dual-signal readout of Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au NPs made it possible to do both qualitative and quantitative analyses using naked eyes and instrument, respectively.
Characterization of Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au composite nanoparticles
The composite nanoparticles used in this study were created by electrostatically assembling AgMBA@Au NPs onto the surface of Fe3O4. This approach effectively preserved the nanoparticles’ basic morphology, Raman optical properties, and magnetic properties. The oxidation state of element Fe in the synthesized nanoparticles was confirmed by XPS (Fig. S1), which in turn confirmed the successful synthesis of Fe3O4 NPs. On this basis, we performed other characterizations of Fe3O4 NPs and the composite particles. The TEM images showed that the synthesized AgMBA@Au and Fe3O4 NPs were in good dispersity and uniform size with sphere appearance (Fig. 2a–b). The average particle sizes of AgMBA@Au and Fe3O4 NPs were 32 ± 1 nm and 165 ± 6 nm, respectively, indicating that AgMBA@Au and Fe3O4 NPs had good homogeneity. After the assembly is completed, AgMBA@Au NPs aggregated around Fe3O4 particles (Fig. 2c). As shown in Fig. 2d, about dozens of AgMBA@Au particles were clustered around one Fe3O4 particle, which would enhance SERS signal intensity of the composite nanoparticles. The EDX images shown in Fig. 2e–i revealed that the outer periphery of the prepared composite nanoparticles was composed of AgMBA@Au NPs, whereas the inner was composed of Fe3O4 NPs. And by examining the UV–vis spectra of MNPs and Fe3O4 alone, it can be seen from Fig. 2j that Fe3O4 alone has no obvious absorption peak between 300 and 900 nm, while MNPs has a characteristic peak at 422 nm. This characteristic peak is slightly red-shifted compared to AgMBA@Au alone (408 nm). This may be caused by the aggregation of AgMBA@Au nanoparticles. And Fig. 2k shows the magnetic behavior of Fe3O4 NPs and Fe3O4- AgMBA@Au NPs. The saturation magnetization (Ms) of Fe3O4 NPs and Fe3O4- AgMBA@Au NPs were found to be 30.3 emu/g and 26.6 emu/g, respectively. Thus, the Ms of Fe3O4 NPs was decreased by the absorption of the AgMBA@Au NPs on their surface. The above characterization confirmed that Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au NPs were successfully synthesized.
Fig. 2.
Characterizing Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au NPs. a–c TEM images of AgMBA@Au, Fe3O4, and MNPs. d High-resolution TEM image of a single MNP. e–i EDX elemental analyses of Ag, Au, Fe, O, and their overlay. j UV–vis spectra of Fe3O4 and MNPs. k Hysteresis loops of Fe3O4 and MNPs
Next, we optimized the assembling conditions. With the increasing volume of AgMBA@Au nanoparticles assembled and the binding time, the SERS signal of Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au NPs increased continuously (Fig. 3a–b). When 30 mL AgMBA@Au was added to 1 mg Fe3O4, the SERS signal reached the highest, presumably because the surface sites of Fe3O4 were virtually entirely occupied by AgMBA@Au particles. When the binding time reached 40 min, the SERS signal reached its maximum value, which was very close to the value observed after 30 min of binding. We finally selected 30 min as the optimal binding time. As shown in Fig. 3c, we verified the relationship between the concentration of Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au NPs and the intensity of Raman spectra and found that there was a good linear relationship (R2 = 0.999), which enabled quantitative detection based on the SERS signal.
Fig. 3.
a Optimization of the dosage of AgMBA@Au nanoparticles. b Optimization of binding time. c Linear relationship between particle concentration and Raman intensity
Dual-mode LFIA performance in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 N protein antibody in serum
To obtain the ideal conditions for detection, we optimized the concentration of BSA in the blocking solution, the amount of IMNPs, and the amount of conjugated antibody on IMNPs (Fig. S2a–c). Finally, we chose 15% BSA, 30 μL of the probe solution, and 15 μg of conjugated antibody as the ideal conditions.
Under the optimized conditions, we evaluated the method’s sensitivity and linear range for detecting SARS-CoV-2 N protein antibody with concentration gradient of 0, 10−10, 10−9, 10−8, 10−7, and 10−6 mg /mL. As shown in Fig. 4a, for samples without target antibodies, just the C line of the test strip displayed color. Once the antibody concentration reached 10−8 mg/mL or more, the T-line is visible to the naked eyes as a dark-gray band, and its color gradually deepened as the antibody concentration rose. In addition, we compared the effect of magnetic separation on the detection signal. SERS signals were found to be stronger in samples with magnetic separation enrichment, as indicated in Fig. 4b, implying that the enrichment step greatly reduced the matrix interference in the samples, thereby improving the sensitivity. For accurate quantitative analysis, portable Raman spectrometer was used to collect the T-line SERS spectra. As shown in Fig. 4c and d, the relationship between the target antibody concentration and the intensity of the maximum scattering peak at 1075 cm−1 was excellently linear within the range of 10−10 to 10−6 mg /mL (R2 = 0.995). SERS analysis has the detection limit three orders of magnitude lower than visual detection, calculated to be 0.08 pg/mL from the minimal detectable signal (the average signal intensity plus triple standard deviation of the blank sample, n = 12). In addition, the detection sensitivity is approximately six times more than that of S protein antibody detection by AgMBA@Au NPs alone. Moreover, comparing various LFIA reporters for detecting SARS-COV-2 N protein antibodies [19, 34, 39–42], SERS-based LFIA demonstrated significantly lower detection limit and wider linear range. In particular, our assay is three orders more sensitive than one using Au gap-enhanced Raman nanotags (GERTs) [34]. This method’s excellent performance was owing to the incorporation of magnetic Fe3O4 particles, which could boost the SERS signal by aggregating AgMBA@Au particles and minimize the interference of complex substrates by magnetic separation.
Fig. 4.
a Photographs of SARS-CoV-2 N protein antibody detection test strips (visible detection limit is 10−8 mg/mL). b The influence of magnetic separation on detection results. c Linear regression between the intensity of SERS signal at 1075 cm−1 and SARS-CoV-2 N protein antibody concentration ranging from 10−10 to 10−6 mg/mL. Error bars are computed using data from three independent experiments. d Corresponding Raman spectra of the test trips with various concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 N protein antibodies in serum
Specificity and reproducibility
The specificity and reproducibility of the dual-mode immunoassay were studied further. To examine the specificity of this method, several proteins were added to serum samples for detecting the related SERS intensity, including SARS-CoV-2 N protein, SARS-CoV-2 N protein antibody, SARS-CoV-2 S protein antibody, SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody, anti-Staphylococcus aureus antibody and anti-Salmonella typhimurium antibody. As shown in Fig. 5, only 0.01 μg/mL, the target antibody could generate an obvious signal on the T-line, while even if the concentration of other samples was 100 to 200 times higher, they did not create any discernible differences compared to the negative samples. Therefore, this approach had satisfactory specificity and enabled the accurate detection of the target N protein antibody in complex matrix. To further study the test strips’ reproducibility, we calculated the intra-assay and inter-assay coefficient of variation (CV) values in serum. As displayed in Table 1, the mean CV values were 8.0% for intra-assay and 11.7% for inter-assay, indicating good reproducibility for our method. Overall, the above results manifested that our dual-model immunoassay had high accuracy and reliability.
Fig. 5.

Specificity of the dual-mode LFIA method by adding various antibodies and proteins to serum
Table 1.
Dual-mode LFIA reproducibility test based on Fe3O4-AgMBA@Au NPs in serum
| Antibody concentration (mg/mL) | Intra-assay | Inter-assay | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | CV (%) | Mean | SD | CV (%) | |
| 10–6 | 10,227 | 720 | 7.0 | 11,583 | 1164 | 14.1 |
| 10–7 | 7335 | 421 | 5.7 | 7510 | 455 | 6.1 |
| 10–8 | 4543 | 519 | 11.4 | 4416 | 625 | 14.5 |
|
Intra-assay variability 8.0% |
Inter-assay variability 11.7% |
|||||
Detection of actual samples
To investigate the feasibility of this method in practical application, we collected serum samples from 107 volunteers, including 9 unvaccinated and 98 vaccinated volunteers. The results were displayed in Fig. 6 and Table S2. Results with T-line visible was considered strong positive. Results whose T-line was not visible but could be identified with a portable Raman equipment was considered weak positive. Negative results were below Raman’s detection limit. Of the vaccinated samples, 49 were strong positive, 18 were weakly positive, and the rest were all negative, while the 9 unvaccinated samples were all negative. Antibodies should be present in the vaccinated samples, but there is a wide range in antibody production following vaccination due to factors such as the timing of vaccination (no antibodies can usually be detected immediately following vaccination, and antibody levels in vaccinated volunteers are decreasing over time) and individual variation in immunity. The results demonstrated that our approach could properly identify antibody levels in serum for outbreak control and vaccine guidance.
Fig. 6.

Actual sample testing results based on the dual-mode LFIA
Conclusions
In conclusion, a new type of nanoprobe was created by combining the Fe3O4 NPs and AgMBA@Au NPs, based on which, a dual-mode colorimetric/SERS LFIA platform was successfully constructed for detecting oSARS-CoV-2 N protein antibody in an ultrasensitive mode. AgMBA@Au NPs with Ag cores and ultra-thin Au shells displayed exceptional SERS properties, as well as good stability and biocompatibility. The magnetic nanoparticle Fe3O4 could boost the SERS signal intensity due to emble numerous AgMBA@Au NPs assembled on its surface, while its magnetic characteristic could also be employed to remove complicated substrates, thus highly improving detection sensitivity and anti-interference ability. Taking advantages of the superior dual signal readout of colorimetric/SERS, the designed LFIA for detecting SARS-CoV-2 N protein antibody had visual detection limit of 10−8 mg/mL, and the quantitative detection limit reached 0.08 pg/mL by SERS, three orders of magnitude more sensitive than visual detection. In addition, our assay substantially improved the sensitivity of detecting SARS-COV-2 N protein antibody compared to other LFIA reporters. Besides, the developed detection platform demonstrated rapidity, efficiency, and accuracy in serum samples. Moreover, we successfully used it to identify the target antibody levels in actual samples. While the proposed platform was successful in detecting total antibodies, it cannot discriminate subclasses like IgM, IgE, and IgG, which provide more information on the progression of an infection or the efficacy of vaccine. So, making multi-channel strips for the combined quantitative detection of IgG and IgM can make the test more accurate and confirm the course of an infection better.
Consequently, the dual-mode and multi-channel LFIA platform has significant potential for in situ and real-time detection, which is crucial for nations or regions with limited resources.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Author contribution
Conceptualization: J.B. Zeng, J.W. Li. Validation: J.W. Li, P.H. Liang. Methodology: J.B. Zeng, J.W. Li. Analysis: P.H. Liang, T.Y. Zhao, G.C. Guo, J.Y. Zhu. Writing—original draft: J.W. Li, P.H. Liang. Writing—review and editing: J.B. Zeng, C.Y. Wen. Supervision: J.B. Zeng, C.Y. Wen. Project administration: J.B. Zeng. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Key Fundamental Project of Shandong Natural Science Foundation (Z.J., ZR2020ZD13), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong (W.C., ZR2020MB064), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (L.J., 21CX06014A; W.C., 22CX03033A), the Science and Technology Projects of Qingdao (Z.J., 21–1-4-sf-7-nsh), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Z.J., no. 21876206).
Declarations
Ethics approval
All included volunteers gave their oral and informed consent. The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (number: QYFYKYLL 984311920).
Source of biological material
The serum samples from 107 volunteers, including 9 unvaccinated and 98 vaccinated volunteers, were collected from the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University.
Competing interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Congying Wen, Email: flcyxt@163.com.
Jingbin Zeng, Email: xmuzjb@163.com.
References
- 1.Pan Y, Zhang D, Yang P, Poon LLM, Wang Q. Viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(4):411–412. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30113-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang W, Xu Y, Gao R, Lu R, Han K, Wu G, et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens. Jama-J Am Med Assoc. 2020;323(18):1843–1844. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dong X, Cao Y-Y, Lu X-X, Zhang J-J, Du H, Yan Y-Q, et al. Eleven faces of coronavirus disease 2019. Allergy. 2020;75(7):1699–709. doi: 10.1111/all.14289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Guo JC, Chen SQ, Guo JH, Ma X. Nanomaterial labels in lateral flow immunoassays for point-of-care-testing. J Mater Sci Technol. 2021;60:90–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.06.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kang S, Yang M, Hong Z, Zhang L, Huang Z, Chen X, et al. Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein RNA binding domain reveals potential unique drug targeting sites. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2020;10(7):1228–1238. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Perdikari TM, Murthy AC, Ryan VH, Watters S, Naik MT, Fawzi NL. SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein phase-separates with RNA and with human hnRNPs. Embo J. 2020;39(24):106478. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020106478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.McAndrews KM, Dowlatshahi DP, Dai J, Becker LM, Hensel J, Snowden LM, et al. Heterogeneous antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain and nucleocapsid with implications for COVID-19 immunity. Jci Insight. 2020;5(18):142386. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.142386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kiew LV, Chang CY, Huang SY, Wang PW, Heh CH, Liu CT, et al. Development of flexible electrochemical impedance spectroscopy-based biosensing platform for rapid screening of SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors. Biosens Bioelectron. 2021;183:113213. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Huang LR, Chiu CM, Yeh SH, Huang WH, Hsueh PR, Yang WZ, et al. Evaluation of antibody responses against SARS coronaviral nucleocapsid or spike proteins by immunoblotting or ELISA. J Med Virol. 2004;73(3):338–346. doi: 10.1002/jmv.20096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shang B, Wang XY, Yuan JW, Vabret A, Wu XD, Yang RF, et al. Characterization and application of monoclonal antibodies against N protein of SARS-coronavirus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;336(1):110–117. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang J, Ji J, Ye J, Zhao X, Wen J, Li W, et al. The structure analysis and antigenicity study of the N protein of SARS-CoV. Genom Proteom Bioinf. 2003;1(2):145–154. doi: 10.1016/S1672-0229(03)01018-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li H, Pan J, Su Y, Wang B, Ge J. SARS-CoV-2 lgM/lgG antibody detection confirms the infection after three negative nucleic acid detection. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(14):8262–8265. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Larsen SE, Berube BJ, Pecor T, Cross E, Brown BP, Williams BD, et al. Qualification of ELISA and neutralization methodologies to measure SARS-CoV-2 humoral immunity using human clinical samples. J Immunol Methods. 2021;499:113160. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2021.113160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ng AHC, Fobel R, Fobel C, Lamanna J, Rackus DG, Summers A, et al. A digital microfluidic system for serological immunoassays in remote settings. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:e6076. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aar6076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lijia S, Lihong S, Huabin W. Serological chemiluminescence immunoassay for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020;34(10):e23466. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gambino CM, Lo Sasso B, Colomba C, Giglio RV, Agnello L, Bivona G, et al. Comparison of a rapid immunochromatographic test with a chemiluminescence immunoassay for detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG. Biochemia medica. 2020;30(3):030901. doi: 10.11613/BM.2020.030901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Huang C, Wen T, Shi FJ, Zeng XY, Jiao YJ. Rapid detection of IgM antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus via colloidal gold nanoparticle-based lateral-flow assay. ACS Omega. 2020;5(21):12550–12556. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bahadir EB, Sezginturk MK. Lateral flow assays: principles, designs and labels. Trac-Trends Anal Chem. 2016;82:286–306. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2016.06.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen Z, Zhang Z, Zhai X, Li Y, Lin L, Zhao H, et al. Rapid and sensitive detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, using lanthanide-doped nanoparticles-based lateral flow immunoassay. Anal Chem. 2020;92(10):7226–7231. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liu D, Ju C, Han C, Shi R, Chen X, Duan D, et al. Nanozyme chemiluminescence paper test for rapid and sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen. Biosens Bioelectron. 2021;173:112817. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liu H, Dai E, Xiao R, Zhou Z, Zhang M, Bai Z, et al. Development of a SERS-based lateral flow immunoassay for rapid and ultra-sensitive detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG in clinical samples. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2021;329:129196. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.129196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Srivastav S, Dankov A, Adanalic M, Grzeschik R, Vi T, Pagel-Wieder S, et al. Rapid and sensitive SERS-based lateral flow test for SARS-CoV2-specific IgM/IgG antibodies. Anal Chem. 2021;93(36):12391–12399. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang X, Yu X, Wen K, Li C, Mujtaba Mari G, Jiang H, et al. Multiplex Lateral Flow Immunoassays Based on Amorphous Carbon Nanoparticles for Detecting Three Fusarium Mycotoxins in Maize. J Agric Food Chem. 2017;65(36):8063–8071. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Taranova NA, Berlina AN, Zherdev AV, Dzantiev BB. ‘Traffic light’ immunochromatographic test based on multicolor quantum dots for the simultaneous detection of several antibiotics in milk. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;63:255–261. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.07.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Beloglazova NV, Sobolev AM, Tessier MD, Hens Z, Goryacheva IY, De Saeger S. Fluorescently labelled multiplex lateral flow immunoassay based on cadmium-free quantum dots. Methods. 2017;116:141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Huang C, Wei Q, Hu Q, Wen T, Xue L, Li S, et al. Rapid detection of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (SFTSV) total antibodies by up-converting phosphor technology-based lateral-flow assay. Luminescence. 2019;34(2):162–167. doi: 10.1002/bio.3588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Martiskainen I, Talha SM, Vuorenpaa K, Salminen T, Juntunen E, Chattopadhyay S, et al. Upconverting nanoparticle reporter-based highly sensitive rapid lateral flow immunoassay for hepatitis B virus surface antigen. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2021;413(4):967–978. doi: 10.1007/s00216-020-03055-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fu X, Wen J, Li J, Lin H, Liu Y, Zhuang X, et al. Highly sensitive detection of prostate cancer specific PCA3 mimic DNA using SERS-based competitive lateral flow assay. Nanoscale. 2019;11(33):15530–15536. doi: 10.1039/C9NR04864B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Su L, Hu H, Tian Y, Jia C, Wang L, Zhang H, et al. Highly sensitive colorimetric/surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy immunoassay relying on a metallic core-shell Au/Au nanostar with clenbuterol as a target analyte. Anal Chem. 2021;93(23):8362–8369. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cai Y, Yan J, Zhu L, Wang H, Lu Y. A rapid immunochromatographic method based on a secondary antibody-labelled magnetic nanoprobe for the detection of hepatitis B preS2 surface antigen. Biosensors-Basel. 2020;10(11):161–177. doi: 10.3390/bios10110161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Razo SC, Panferov VG, Safenkova IV, Varitsev YA, Zherdev AV, Dzantiev BB. Double-enhanced lateral flow immunoassay for potato virus X based on a combination of magnetic and gold nanoparticles. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1007:50–60. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2017.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Xiao R, Lu L, Rong Z, Wang C, Peng Y, Wang F, et al. Portable and multiplexed lateral flow immunoassay reader based on SERS for highly sensitive point-of-care testing. Biosens Bioelectron. 2020;168:112524. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wang Z, Zong S, Wu L, Zhu D, Cui Y. SERS-activated platforms for immunoassay: probes, encoding methods, and applications. Chem Rev. 2017;117(12):7910–7963. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chen S, Meng L, Wang L, Huang X, Ali S, Chen X, et al. SERS-based lateral flow immunoassay for sensitive and simultaneous detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies by using gap-enhanced Raman nanotags. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2021;348:130706. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rycenga M, Xia X, Moran CH, Zhou F, Qin D, Li Z-Y, et al. Generation of hot spots with silver nanocubes for single-molecule detection by surface-enhanced raman scattering. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50(24):5473–5477. doi: 10.1002/anie.201101632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liang P, Guo Q, Zhao T, Wen C-Y, Tian Z, Shang Y, et al. Ag nanoparticles with ultrathin Au shell-based lateral flow immunoassay for colorimetric and SERS dual-mode detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgG. Anal Chem. 2022;94(23):8466–8473. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c01286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wan Y, Guo Z, Jiang X, Fang K, Lu X, Zhang Y, et al. Quasi-spherical silver nanoparticles: aqueous synthesis and size control by the seed-mediated Lee-Meisel method. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2013;394:263–268. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.12.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liu H, Liu T, Zhang L, Han L, Gao C, Yin Y. Etching-free epitaxial growth of gold on silver nanostructures for high chemical stability and plasmonic activity. Adv Funct Mater. 2015;25(34):5435–5443. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201502366. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang Z, Zheng Z, Hu H, Zhou Q, Liu W, Li X, et al. A point-of-care selenium nanoparticle-based test for the combined detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG in human serum and blood. Lab Chip. 2020;20(22):4255–4261. doi: 10.1039/D0LC00828A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ahmadi A, Mirzaeizadeh Z, Omidfar K. Simultaneous detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM antibodies, using gold nanoparticles-based lateral flow immunoassay. Monoclon Antibodies Immunodiag Immunother. 2021;40(5):210–218. doi: 10.1089/mab.2021.0027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chen C, Hu H, Li X, Zheng Z, Wang Z, Wang X, et al. Rapid DETECTION OF Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody using a selenium nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci. 2022;21(1):37–43. doi: 10.1109/TNB.2021.3105662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bayin Q, Huang L, Ren C, Fu Y, Ma X, Guo J. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM detection with a GMR based LFIA system. Talanta. 2021;227:122207. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




