Abstract
Background
Maize-infecting viruses are known to inflict significant agronomic yield loss throughout the world annually. Identification of known or novel causal agents of disease prior to outbreak is imperative to preserve food security via future crop protection efforts. Toward this goal, a large-scale metagenomic approach utilizing high throughput sequencing (HTS) was employed to identify novel viruses with the potential to contribute to yield loss of graminaceous species, particularly maize, in North America.
Results
Here we present four novel viruses discovered by HTS and individually validated by Sanger sequencing. Three of these viruses are RNA viruses belonging to either the Betaflexiviridae or Tombusviridae families. Additionally, a novel DNA virus belonging to the Geminiviridae family was discovered, the first Mastrevirus identified in North American maize.
Conclusions
Metagenomic studies of crop and crop-related species such as this may be useful for the identification and surveillance of known and novel viral pathogens of crops. Monitoring related species may prove useful in identifying viruses capable of infecting crops due to overlapping insect vectors and viral host-range to protect food security.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-022-09001-w.
Keywords: Mastrevirus, Tombusvirus, Umbravirus, Betaflexivirus, Maize chlorotic mottle virus
Background
Zea mays L. (maize) is grown all over the world for uses as food, feed, industrial feedstocks, and ethanol production. Numerous plant viruses infect maize, some of which are attributed to significant yield losses by themselves or in concurrent infections with other viruses [1]. For example, maize streak virus (MSV) [2, 3], and more recently the maize lethal necrosis disease (MLND), caused by co-infections of maize chlorotic mottle virus and a potyvirus, such as sugarcane mosaic virus [4], have been devastating to maize production in Africa. Recently, high throughput sequencing (HTS) was used to identify viruses in maize leaves displaying symptoms consistent with maize lethal necrosis, and surprisingly, the spectrum of viruses occurring in co-infections causing this disease was expanded [5]. These results imply that breeding maize for resistance to MLND may not be as straightforward as expected. They also illustrate the power of using HTS to identify viruses infecting maize.
In more general terms, identification of novel plant viruses has improved dramatically with the advent of HTS technologies and the accompanying informatics pipelines for identification [6]. Application of HTS has culminated in the identification of an astounding number of unique viruses in recent years and a greater appreciation for the presence of plant viruses in natural and agricultural ecosystems [7, 8]. Plant viruses often cause symptoms, but they are also found more frequently than expected in asymptomatic plants [9]. This suggests that greater efforts are needed to better understand the viruses associated with crop and allied species that comprise different agroecosystems [10]. Furthermore, viruses causing asymptomatic infections or residing in weedy species near or mixed with crops may represent previously unappreciated threats to agriculture. Improving crop yield by mitigating pathogen-associated losses is expected to be increasingly important with climate change, population growth, and resource limitations [11]. Attempts to counter virus-associated crop loss have influenced breeding strategies to develop resistant lines [3, 12]. These efforts, while slow, have proven relatively successful [13]. However, the virosphere is constantly evolving, producing new potential threats [14]. Aside from their importance in causing disease losses, plant viruses, or sequences derived from them, can also be developed into powerful biotechnology tools for silencing [15], over-expressing [16], and editing plant genes [17–19]. Novel viruses may possess properties that provide new opportunities for such biotechnology applications or simply represent improvements over known viruses.
In addition to virus identification, HTS has also provided surveillance capabilities that enable researchers to track virus mutations and movement to assess potential threats related to virus evolution and epidemiology [20]. Such large-scale sequencing efforts are generally performed in regard to arboviruses [21] or potential zoonotically transferred viruses toward human protection efforts [22]. Identification of pathogens impacting crops and crop-related species is imperative to assess, control, and protect agronomically important crops, indirectly protecting humans by preserving the food supply [23].
Toward this objective, a metagenomic approach utilizing HTS was used to identify novel viruses of symptomatic and asymptomatic graminaceous species related to and including maize. We performed RNAseq on a total of 151 maize, teosinte, sorghum, switchgrass, and maize-associated aphid field-samples from Mexico and the USA. While teosinte and switchgrass are not staple crop species, they are related grass species, as such they may be reservoirs harboring viruses capable of infecting maize [24, 25]. In addition to known viruses that were identified, maize and teosinte samples evaluated by RNAseq were found to contain four novel viruses: three RNA viruses belonging to the Betaflexiviridae or Tombusviridae families, and a DNA virus belonging to the Geminiviridae family, which is to our knowledge the first Mastrevirus identified in North American maize.
Materials and methods
Plant material
The majority of maize and teosinte leaf samples were collected in the state of Guanajuato, Mexico, in areas between and surrounding the cities of Irapuato and Moroleón (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 1). Approximately 20 cm long leaf tips from mature maize plants were collected with scissors in October, 2017. Individual leaves were placed into 50 mL screw-cap centrifuge tubes. The tubes were transported as airline baggage at ambient temperature and then frozen at − 80 °C approximately three days after collection. Maize leaves were imported into the USA under USDA-APHIS permit PCIP-17-00464. Additional leaf samples from asymptomatic maize plants that were infested with aphids were collected within Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, North Carolina, and South Dakota in the USA (Supplementary Table 1). Leaf tissues were stored at − 80 °C prior to RNA isolation.
RNA extraction, cDNA library preparation, and RNA sequencing
Leaf tissues were frozen in liquid nitrogen and pulverized using a Qiagen Tissuelyser II. Total RNA was extracted using the Zymo Direct-zol RNA Miniprep Plus kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) that included an on-column DNase treatment following the manufacturer’s specifications. The DNA-free total RNA was subjected to ribosomal RNA depletion by Illumina Ribo-Zero rRNA Removal Kit (Plant Leaf) (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and concentrated using the Zymo RNA Clean & Concentrator-5 kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). Total RNA was quantified with a Qubit 3.0 fluorometer and quality assessed with a NanoDrop 2000. All RNA had A260/280 and A260/230 ratios between 1.55–2.09 and 0.55–2.29, respectively. Strand-specific cDNA libraries were prepared from ribosomal depleted RNA using the NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). Illumina sequencing was performed on the dual-indexed cDNA libraries on an Illumina HiSeq3000 (paired-end 150 bp reads; 2 lanes per library).
Next-generation sequencing (HTS) data analysis
Paired-end reads generated were evaluated for their quality by FastQC (Phred quality score above 30) [26]. Adapter removal and trimming were performed using Trimmomatic software [27]. All filtered reads were first mapped to plant and aphid genomes as reference using Hisat2 alignment program [28]. Reference genome sequences used for all maize samples included B73 (GenBank accession number: GCA_000005005.6), CML247 (GenBank accession number: GCA_002682915.2), and W22 (GenBank accession number: GCA_001644905.2). Reference genome sequences used for all teosinte samples included Zea mays ssp. mexicana (GenBank accession numbers: GCA_002813485.1, GCA_002813485.1, and GCA_000223545.1). Aphid and bacterial symbiont reference sequences used include the following: NC_002528.1 Buchnera aphidicola str. APS (Acyrthosiphon pisum) chromosome, complete genome, NZ_CP002701.1 Buchnera aphidicola str. G002 (Myzus persicae), complete genome, buchnera_scaf.v1.fa, Acyrthosiphon pisum, whole genome shotgun sequence, and Myzus persicae strain clone G006, whole genome shotgun sequence. The remaining unmapped reads were aligned to reference viral and viroid genomes (30,646 genome sequences) obtained from NCBI GenBank database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/viruses) using Bowtie2 aligner [29]. The mapped viral reads and unmapped non-plant, non-viral reads were de novo assembled separately with a default k-mer of 25 using Trinity v2.6.6 [30]. All assembled contigs were queried against the all-organism NCBI nucleotide and protein database through BLASTN and BLASTX searches with default parameters using Blastplus v2.7.1 [31]. A similar informatics pipeline has previously been proven capable of virus identification by our research group [32].
Novel virus validation
Following identification of putative novel viruses (contigs larger than 1500 bp with less than 80% sequence identity by BLASTN and BLASTX analysis) the original tissue corresponding to the RNAseq samples were utilized for DNA or RNA extraction dependent on the viral genome. DNA extraction followed the CTAB method as described [33], and RNA extraction was performed by TriZol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) extraction method as recommended by the manufacturer. Isolated RNA was dsDNase treated and cDNA was generated with the Maxima H Minus cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
The sequences of de novo assembled contigs were utilized to design primers suitable for PCR or RT-PCR amplification of DNA or RNA viruses, respectively (Supplementary Table 2). Amplification was performed using Platinum SuperFi II PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), a high-fidelity DNA polymerase, according to manufacturer’s protocol in presence of the included GC-enhancer. Each resulting amplicon covered approximately 25–100% of the putative viral sequence. Viral genomes amplified by multiple primer sets included overlapping areas of sequence to bolster confidence in sequencing. Amplicons were gel purified and extracted using the NEB Monarch DNA Gel Extraction Kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and cloned into the pUC19 plasmid for Sanger sequencing with M13 primers [34] and internal viral genome primers (Supplementary Table 2). Sanger sequencing was performed by the Iowa State University DNA Facility. Sequences submitted to GenBank for all novel viruses reported are a combination of HTS data with sequence validation or correction by Sanger sequencing (Supplementary File S1).
Phylogenetic analysis
The predicted amino acid sequences encoding the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) for each of the novel Tombusvirids and the Betaflexivirid were aligned to RdRP amino acid sequences from selected viruses in the Tombusviridae and Betaflexiviridae families using muscle 3.8.31 [35]. Multiple sequence alignments were passed to FastTree 2.1.11 with the “-lg” option [36]. Phylogenetic trees were drawn in FigTree 1.4.4 where they were re-rooted on the appropriate outgroups.
The complete nucleotide sequence of the novel Mastrevirus was aligned to selected Mastrevirus genomes using SDT 1.2 [37] which also produced the sequence identity heatmap. The values used to produce the heatmap shown in Fig. 4 are provided in (Supplementary Table 3).
Results and discussion
A total of 90 maize, 54 teosinte, 3 switchgrass, 1 sorghum, and 3 maize-associated aphid samples originating in North America were collected for RNAseq analysis with the goal of identifying novel viruses. Most of these samples were collected in areas between and surrounding the cities of Irapuato and Moroleón in the state of Guanajuato, Mexico (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 1). However, 28 of the samples were collected in the USA. Leaf or aphid samples were processed through cDNA library creation for Illumina sequencing, and the resulting sequence data were analyzed using an informatics pipeline designed to identify known or novel viruses (Fig. 2).
These analyses are limited to near full-length or full-length viral genomes as opposed to fragments. Due to the large volume of samples and contigs identified as viral, for identification of novel viruses, we chose to focus on contigs greater than 1500 bases with less than 80% predicted homology to known plant-infecting viruses based on BLASTn and BLASTx searches to reduce the potential for false identifications. Numerous samples contained contigs that are viral in nature, but unlikely to be associated with plant-infecting viruses due to their sequence identity to viruses known to infect mammalian, insect, fungal, or bacterial hosts; thus they are not discussed here.
Known viruses
Contigs associated with known viruses were identified in 17 of the 151 samples analyzed (Supplementary Table 1). Maize chlorotic mottle virus (MCMV) was found in 8 samples, maize yellow mosaic virus (MaYMV) in 4 samples, and maize rayado fino virus (MRFV) in 7 samples. Two of these samples contained a mixture of MaYMV and MRFV, and one had a mixture of MCMV and MRFV. All of the above samples were from Mexico. Of the 28 samples collected in the USA, one from South Dakota contained the complete tripartite genome of brome mosaic virus (BMV). None of the other USA samples had full-length viral genomes, despite the fact that most samples were infested with known aphid vectors (Rhopalosiphum padi or R. maidis). Most Mexican samples had disease symptoms while those from the USA did not. The presence of these viruses is no surprise. BMV is long known in South Dakota and MCMV and MRFV are endemic in Mexico [1]. While MaYMV per se may not have been reported in Mexico, it is also known as Maize yellow dwarf virus-RMV-II [38] and is extremely closely related to Maize yellow dwarf virus-RMV, which was known previously as Barley yellow dwarf virus-RMV [39]. The yellow dwarf viruses of cereals are well-known to occur in Mexico and worldwide [40].
Novel viruses
Mastrevirus
Plant-infecting DNA viruses belonging to the family Geminiviridae, are small monopartite or bipartite circular ssDNA viruses. Members of this family belong to one of nine genera based on genome structure and organization, plant host, and insect vector [41]. The Mastrevirus genus are monopartite single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) viruses, most of which have monocot host plants [42]. The virion-sense of the Mastrevirus genome encodes movement (MP) and capsid (CP) proteins, while the anti-sense encodes the two replication associated proteins RepA (C1) and Rep (C1:C2), with Rep being the translation product of a splicing variant of RepA [43, 44]. Mastrevirus genomes also contain two intergenic regions, a long intergenic region (LIR) and a short intergenic region (SIR). The LIR contains transcription start sites and the origin of virion strand replication (v-ori) with a conserved nonanucleotide stem-loop motif 5′-TAATATTAC-3′ [45, 46], while the SIR contains transcription termination sites and the complementary-strand replication origin [47]. Historically these viruses have been identified within old-world continents such as Africa, Asia, and Europe, with more recent discoveries occurring in the Americas [48–50]. However, no maize-infecting Mastrevirus has been reported in North America.
A BLASTn search against the GenBank nr database using a 3137 base contig from maize sample #76 (Supplementary Table 1) identified a 168-nucleotide region with ~ 81% identity to the Rep coding sequence (CDS) of sugarcane striate virus (SCStV), a Mastrevirus [51]. Subsequent evaluation of this contig by a BLASTx search revealed potential homology (~ 31% query coverage with 39–44% amino acid identity) to the RepA proteins of SCStV and maize streak virus (MSV), which is the type member of the Mastrevirus genus. The putative proteins encoded by the open reading frames (ORFs) of the unknown virus also have homology to conserved Geminiviridae motifs in movement protein (MP), coat protein (CP), and replication protein (REP) (pfam01708, pfam00844, pfam08283, pfam00799), as well as a protein of unknown function, DUF1069, encoded in the MSV genome (pfam06370) (e-values 0–3.71e− 5).
To validate the presence and sequence of this putative Mastrevirus, DNA was isolated from maize sample #76 for amplification and sequencing of the viral genome (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 2). The resulting 2760-nt genome sequence confirmed the circular nature of the viral genome and corrected the original contig to obtain the full-length viral sequence that we designate, provisionally, as North American maize-associated Mastrevirus (NAMaMV) (GenBank accession: MZ852895).
The full NAMaMV genome contains putative ORF products with homology to known Mastreviruses identified by BLASTx (Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 3). Residing within the putative Rep proteins are conserved motifs such as rolling-circle replication (RCR) motif I – III [52], Geminivirus rep sequence (GRS) [53], LxCxE retinoblastoma binding [54], and dNTP binding domains [55] (Supplementary Fig. 3). The intron associated with the Rep C1:C2 transcript is presumed from the split Rep catalytic motif (pfam08283) (Supplementary Fig. 3). Full-length genome analysis to validate novelty was performed using the pairwise identity Sequence Demarcation Tool (SDT) set forth by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) [37]. Novel species are required to possess less than 78% sequence identity to any recognized species. Our SDT analysis indicates NAMaMV is a novel member of the Mastrevirus genera of the Geminiviridae, with a maximum of 63.5% pairwise identity to Maize streak Réunion virus (MSRV) (Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 3).
The presumed LIR of NAMaMV includes the v-ori containing a non-canonical nonanucleotide motif 5′-TAATGTTAC-3′, differing from the canonical 5′-TAATATTAC-3′ sequence associated with members of Geminiviridae [41]. This nonanucleotide sequence variation has recently been identified in a watermelon-infecting isolate of a Mastrevirus, chickpea chlorotic dwarf virus (CpCDV) [56]. Thus, NAMaMV is the first monocot-infecting Mastrevirus with this nonanucleotide variation, as well as the first identified Mastrevirus in maize in North America.
Betaflexivirus
Members of the Betaflexiviridae family have flexuous filamentous virions with genomes of 6–9 kb coding for three to six genes depending on the genus. In general, these viruses contain a short 5′-UTR followed by ORF1, the largest gene product, which encodes the replication protein that possesses methyltransferase (Mtr), helicase (Hel), and RdRP functions [57]. Contigs associated with teosinte samples #49 and #106 were identified by a BLASTn search against the Genbank non-redundant database as having similarity (81.6% identity to a 125-base tract) to apple chlorotic leaf spot virus. Analysis of these contigs by BLASTx revealed putative amino acid similarity to a number of members of Betaflexiviridae, most significantly scaevola virus A (40.8% identity to an 832-base tract), and identified conserved motifs for MP, Mtr, CP, Hel, and RdRP (pfam01107, pfam01660, pfam05892, pfam01443, pfam00978) (e-values 6.8e− 18 – 6.2e− 4) (Fig. 5A). Comparison of the two novel contigs revealed they are approximately 85% identical to each other at the nucleotide level. The predicted translation product of the identified ORF1 sequence is 94% identical between these contigs. The ICTV species and genus demarcation criteria require novel species to have less than 72% nt (or 80% aa) identity for RdRPs, as such, these contigs appear to be different isolates of the same novel virus.
Tissue associated with sample #49 was utilized for RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, RT-PCR, and sequencing of the amplicon to validate the presence and sequence of the virus (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 2) designated, provisionally, herein as teosinte-associated betaflexivirus (TaBV) (GenBank accession: OK018178).
The presumed ORFs encoding the RdRP of TaBV was used for phylogenetic analysis using members of Betaflexiviridae. This phylogeny demonstrates TaBV RdRP similarity to members of Betaflexiviridae but it remains distinct from specific genera (Fig. 6), indicating TaBV is an unclassified member of Betaflexiviridae. The TaBV RdRP groups mostly closely with that of maize-associated betaflexivirus (MN714158.1), an incomplete viral genome sequence possibly of the same virus species as TaBV, but found in Rwanda [61].
Tombusviridae
Tombusviridae is a diverse viral family with genomes encoding four to seven ORFs [62]. Only ORFs 1 and 2 are translated from genomic RNA. The downstream ORFs are translated from subgenomic mRNAs often using a variety of noncanonical translation mechanisms [63]. The genomic and subgenomic mRNAs of tombusvirids are translated in a cap-independent manner, relying on a cap-independent translation element located in the 3’UTR [58, 64]. The distinguishing and unifying feature of Tombusviridae is the conserved RdRP translated from ORF2 by suppression of termination at a stop codon or by a − 1 frameshift to bypass a stop codon, generating fusions of the ORF1 and ORF2-encoded proteins [65]. Members of this family in the Umbravirus genus lack an ORF encoding CP and instead rely on a co-infection with a member of Solemoviridae to supply CP in trans for vector transmission [66].
Two contigs with 99% nucleotide identity were identified in maize and teosinte samples #3 (GenBank accession: OK018181) and #21 (GenBank accession: OK018182) (Supplementary Table 1), respectively. These contigs displayed sequence similarity to the 5′ UTR of Hubei tombus-like virus (~ 87% identity of 60 bases) by BLASTn search against the GenBank non-redundant database. A BLASTx search using these contigs showed 27% query coverage with 67% identity to the RdRP of apple tombus-like virus 2.
Subsequently, RT-PCR amplicons were sequenced to validate the presence of this virus, which is designated, provisionally, herein as Maize-associated tombusvirid (MaTV) (GenBank accessions: OK018181, OK018182) (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 2). The genome of this virus is predicted to encode at least five proteins, including conserved motifs within CP and RdRP (pfam00729 and pfam00998) (Fig. 5B). Phylogenetic analysis of the presumed RdRP with Tombusviridae members demonstrates that these viruses cluster within Tombusviridae. While they appear to belong to this family, they do not display significant homology to the members within any specific genus. Their closest relative is apple virus E (AVE, GenBank accession: MT892660), which also has not been assigned to a genus (Fig. 7).
Both MaTV and AVE appear to differ remarkably from other tombusvirids. Firstly, the replication protein encoded by ORF1 initiates 600 nt from the 5′ end of the genome, which is much longer than the 10 to 160 nt found in other tombusvirids. Secondly, in MaTV, there is a 112 codon ORF, upstream of ORF1, which we call ORF0. The potential protein product showed no homology to any known proteins, and this ORF is absent in AVE, which has no significant ORFs upstream of ORF1. Finally, if ORF0 is translated, it would be difficult to explain how ORFs 1 and 2 are initiated, given that ribosomes would terminate translation of ORF0 203 nt upstream of the ORF1/2 AUG. In summary, we speculate that the entire 600 nt upstream of the ORF1/2 AUG may be untranslated, which certainly appears to be the case with AVE. Such a long 5′ UTR might contain an internal ribosome entry site (IRES), as in picornaviruses or triticum mosaic virus (Potyviridae). Such long IRESes are highly structured, but we found few strong predicted secondary structures in this 600 nt tract, using structure prediction programs mfold and Scanfold [59, 67].
The genomic region downstream of ORF2 bears some resemblance to those of genus Luteovirus (Tombusviridae) and the Polerovirus and Enamovirus genera in the Solemovirdae. ORF3 encodes the coat protein (CP), immediately followed by ORF5 which is likely translated via in-frame readthrough of the ORF 3 stop codon. Shortly downstream of the ORF3 stop codon is a (CCXXXX)4-(ACXXXX)1-(CCXXXX)6 repeat that differs by one base from the (CCXXXX)8–16 repeat at this position that participates in readthrough of the ORF3 stop codon in the luteo/polero/enamoviruses [68]. Interestingly, AVE, in which ORF5 is also in-frame with ORF3, has no (CCXXXX)n motifs whatsoever (Accession no. MT892660). Downstream of the (CCXXXX)n repeats, the amino acid sequence of the MaTV readthrough domain (encoded by ORF5) shows little similarity to those of the luteo/polero/enamoviruses. Translation of ORF5 to generate the readthrough protein (RTP) extension to the C-terminus of the CP is required for the virion of luteo/polero/enamoviruses to be transmitted by aphids, in a circulative (but non-replicative) manner [69–71]. Thus, we predict that MaTV is also transmitted in this fashion by a sucking insect.
The luteo- and poleroviruses (but not enamoviruses) also encode a movement protein ORF (called ORF4) that overlaps entirely with the CP ORF. Here, we identified such an ORF in MaTV, but it is predicted to start upstream of ORF3, unlike in the luteo- and poleroviruses, in which ORF4 initiates a few codons downstream of the start of ORF3. The product of MaTV ORF4 (called P4) has no obvious sequence similarity to the P4 proteins of luteo- and poleroviruses, and yielded no Genbank hits using BLASTp. The AVE sequence has indels that place the first 30 codons, including the initiator methionine, out-of-frame with the rest of the ORF. Thus, the biological relevance of ORF4 is uncertain.
The luteoviruses and poleroviruses also encode a 45 amino acid, non-AUG-initiated ORF (ORF3a) required for movement that overlaps with the 5′ end of ORF3. We found some non-AUG-initiated ORFs in this vicinity, one of which is three times longer than ORF3a, but no ORFs showed homology to ORF3a. In summary, MaTV, and the previously sequenced AVE, appear to represent an unusual genus in the already diverse Tombusviridae family, characterized by an extremely long 5′ UTR, and an arrangement of ORFs around the CP ORF (ORF3) that imperfectly resemble that found in the Luteovirus genus.
Finally, BLASTn analysis of a 3068 bp contig associated with maize sample #5 (Supplementary Table 1) yielded a singular result with nominal similarity (~ 82% identity of a 67-base tract) to the CDS of the RdRP of carrot mottle virus (CMoV), an Umbravirus. Analysis by BLASTx indicated ORF similarity to the RdRP of umbra- and umbra-like viruses Ethiopia maize-associated virus and opuntia umbra-like virus, and identified the conserved RdRP motif (pfam00998, E-value: 1.7e− 78) in the putative ORF (Fig. 5C).
The 5′ UTR through ORF2 of the genome was amplified by RT-PCR and sequenced for validation of this sequence (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 2), we designate as maize-associated umbra-like virus (MaUV) (GenBank accession: OK018180). Phylogenetic analysis of the RdRP demonstrates homology sufficient to cluster this virus within Tombusviridae, however, not within the Umbravirus genus (Fig. 7), indicating that MaUV is an unclassified umbra-like virus, like those recently investigated [58, 72]. MaUV RNA shows strong structural similarities to those of the other umbra-like viruses, including a predicted large pseudo knotted structure proposed to induce − 1 frameshifting for translation of the RdRP [72], and a large, predicted bulged stem-loop resembling an “I-shaped structure-like structure” (ISSLS) (Fig. 5D), found in other umbra-like viruses [58], that would confer cap-independent translation of the viral genome.
Conclusions
We have presented genome sequences of three novel RNA viruses, one belonging to Betaflexivridae, and two members of Tombusviridae, as well as a novel DNA Mastrevirus belonging to Geminiviridae. Each of these viruses was found within leaf tissue of maize or teosinte originating in North America and collected in the summer of 2017. All tissues collected yielded reads or contigs associated with viruses, many of which are known to infect maize, such as MCMV, MRFV, and MaYMV. Although leaf samples were collected throughout North America, the novel viruses were identified only from tissue collected in Mexico. We speculate this may be due to the significantly fewer number of samples originating from the USA, variations in susceptibility to pathogens in maize lines, diversity and abundance of virus-transmitting insects, differences in use of pesticides, as well as climate and geographic location differences that influence virus ecology. In addition, the USA samples did not display any virus-like symptoms although they were from plants that were infested with aphids.
Two isolates of the novel Betaflexiviridae member TaBV were discovered in teosinte samples geographically separated by 74 km. These contigs are approximately 85% similar at the nucleotide level, with 94% identity at the amino acid level for ORF1 encoding the viral replication protein. This would indicate that TaBV may have been widespread among teosinte in the area sampled.
The novel Tombusvirid MaTV was discovered in both teosinte and maize samples collected in the same geographic location. This emphasizes the necessity of identification of novel viruses of related species surrounding crops, as they are potential reservoirs of viruses with similar or overlapping host ranges. Owing to the dependence of umbraviruses on a helper virus in the Solemoviridae family to provide CP for encapsidation and transmission, we expected to identify a known or novel solemovirid associated with MaUV. However, there were no contigs associated with one in that sample, as such, we are unable to identify the viral partner that may be required for transmission of this virus.
The novel Mastrevirus, NAMaMV, is to our knowledge the first Geminiviridae member identified in maize in North America. Identification of a novel Mastrevirus in a crop species in North America is interesting as these are generally viewed as old world viruses, although a number have been identified in Central and South America in recent years. These recent discoveries raise questions as to their origins, whether these viruses were endemic and only being discovered due to technological advances, or are evolutionary products of old world mastreviruses.
We demonstrate here that metagenomic studies of crop and crop-related species are useful for the identification and surveillance of known and novel viral pathogens of crops. Monitoring related species may prove useful in identifying viruses capable of infecting crops due to overlapping insect vectors and viral host-range. This could provide a preemptive warning, affording researchers time to characterize these viruses and to diminish associated impacts through plant breeding or insect vector control programs to protect our food and energy security.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We appreciate the expertise of the Iowa State University DNA facility for their effort in HTS library processing, HTS sequencing, and Sanger sequencing associated with this project. We thank Ruairidh Sawers for assistance in collecting maize and teosinte leaf samples in Mexico.
Abbreviations
- HTS
High throughput sequencing
- RNAseq
RNA sequencing
- MLND
Maize lethal necrosis disease
- MCMV
Maize chlorotic mottle virus
- MaYMV
Maize yellow mosaic virus
- MRFV
Maize rayado fino virus
- MP
movement protein
- CP
Capsid protein
- Rep
Replication protein
- RepA
Replication associated protein
- CDS
Coding sequence
- SCStV
Sugarcane striate virus
- MSV
Maize streak virus
- NAMaMV
North American maize-associated Mastrevirus
- LIR
Long intergenic region
- Mtr
methyltransferase
- Hel
Helicase
- RdRP
RNA dependent RNA polymerase
- TaBV
Teosinte-associated betaflexivirus
- sgRNA
subgenomic RNA
- MaUV
Maize-associated umbra-like virus
Authors’ contributions
SAW, WAM, and GJ conceived and supervised this project. RRL drafted the manuscript. RRL prepared the figures and tables. RRL executed the experiments. MGE, WAM, and RRL performed the bioinformatic and data analysis. ZL performed the phylogenetic analysis. GJ collected the majority of samples utilized for RNAseq. All authors provided editorial input and have read and approved the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by agreement HR0011-17-2-0053 from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Insect Allies Program with the Boyce Thompson Institute. Iowa State University was part of a team supporting the Insect Allies program. SAW and WAM were also supported by the ISU Plant Sciences Institute, USDA NIFA Hatch Project 4308, and State of Iowa Funds.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated during the current study are available in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA accession: PRJNA753546). Sequences for the identified novel viruses NAMaMV, TaBV, MaTV, and MaUV can be found at the NCBI GenBank database under accession numbers MZ852895, OK018178, OK018181, and OK018180, respectively.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
W. Allen Miller, Email: wamiller@iastate.edu.
Steven A. Whitham, Email: swhitham@iastate.edu
References
- 1.Redinbaugh MG, Zambrano JL. Control of virus diseases in maize. Adv Virus Res. 2014;90:391–429. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801246-8.00008-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rybicki EP. A top ten list for economically important plant viruses. Arch Virol. 2015;160:17–20. doi: 10.1007/s00705-014-2295-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Emeraghi M, Achigan-Dako EG, Nwaoguala CNC, Oselebe H. Maize streak virus research in Africa: an end or a crossroad. Theor Appl Genet. 2021;134:3785–3803. doi: 10.1007/s00122-021-03914-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Redinbaugh MG, Stewart LR. Maize lethal necrosis: an emerging, synergistic viral disease. Annu Rev Virol. 2018;5:301–322. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-092917-043413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wamaitha MJ, Nigam D, Maina S, Stomeo F, Wangai A, Njuguna JN, et al. Metagenomic analysis of viruses associated with maize lethal necrosis in Kenya. Virol J. 2018;15:90. doi: 10.1186/s12985-018-0999-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Roossinck MJ. Deep sequencing for discovery and evolutionary analysis of plant viruses. Virus Res. 2017;239:82–86. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2016.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hasiów-Jaroszewska B, Boezen D, Zwart MP. Metagenomic studies of viruses in weeds and wild plants: a powerful approach to characterise variable virus communities. Viruses. 2021;13:1939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Villamor DEV, Ho T, Al Rwahnih M, Martin RR, Tzanetakis IE. High throughput sequencing for plant virus detection and discovery. Phytopathology. 2019;109:716–725. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-07-18-0257-RVW. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Roossinck MJ, Martin DP, Roumagnac P. Plant virus metagenomics: advances in virus discovery. Phytopathology. 2015;105:716–727. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-12-14-0356-RVW. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Malmstrom CM, Bigelow P, Trębicki P, Busch AK, Friel C, Cole E, et al. Crop-associated virus reduces the rooting depth of non-crop perennial native grass more than non-crop-associated virus with known viral suppressor of RNA silencing (VSR) Virus Res. 2017;241:172–184. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2017.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Food and agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO in the 21st century: ensuring food security in a changing world. Rome.: Food & Agriculture Org; 2011.
- 12.Murithi A, Olsen MS, Kwemoi DB, Veronica O, Ertiro BT, Suresh LM, et al. Discovery and validation of a recessively inherited major-effect QTL conferring resistance to maize lethal necrosis (MLN) disease. Front Genet. 2021;12:767883. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.767883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yang Q, Balint-Kurti P, Xu M. Quantitative disease resistance: dissection and adoption in maize. Mol Plant. 2017;10:402–413. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jones RAC. Global plant virus disease pandemics and epidemics. Plants. 2021;10:233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Rössner C, Lotz D, Becker A. VIGS Goes viral: how VIGS transforms our understanding of plant science. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2022. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-102820-020542. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 16.Saxena P, Thuenemann EC, Sainsbury F, Lomonossoff GP. Virus-derived vectors for the expression of multiple proteins in plants. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1385:39–54. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3289-4_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cody WB, Scholthof HB. Plant virus vectors 3.0: transitioning into synthetic genomics. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2019;57:211–230. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-082718-100301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ellison EE, Nagalakshmi U, Gamo ME, Huang P-J, Dinesh-Kumar S, Voytas DF. Author correction: multiplexed heritable gene editing using RNA viruses and mobile single guide RNAs. Nat Plants. 2021;7:99. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-00837-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Khakhar A, Voytas DF. RNA viral vectors for accelerating plant synthetic biology. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:668580. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.668580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Téllez-Sosa J, Rodríguez MH, Gómez-Barreto RE, Valdovinos-Torres H, Hidalgo AC, Cruz-Hervert P, et al. Using high-throughput sequencing to leverage surveillance of genetic diversity and oseltamivir resistance: a pilot study during the 2009 influenza a(H1N1) pandemic. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bichaud L, de Lamballerie X, Alkan C, Izri A, Gould EA, Charrel RN. Arthropods as a source of new RNA viruses. Microb Pathog. 2014;77:136–141. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2014.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Van Brussel K, Holmes EC. Zoonotic disease and virome diversity in bats. Curr Opin Virol. 2022;52:192–202. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2021.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rizzo DM, Lichtveld M, Mazet JAK, Togami E, Miller SA. Plant health and its effects on food safety and security in a one health framework: four case studies. One Health Outlook. 2021;3:6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24.Nault LR. Response of annual and perennial teosintes (Zea) to six maize viruses. Plant Dis. 1982;66:61. doi: 10.1094/PD-66-61. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Garrett KA, Dendy SP, Power AG, Blaisdell GK, Alexander HM, McCarron JK. Barley yellow dwarf disease in natural populations of dominant tallgrass prairie species in Kansas. Plant Dis. 2004;88:574. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.5.574B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Andrews S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12:357–360. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Haas BJ, Papanicolaou A, Yassour M, Grabherr M, Blood PD, Bowden J, et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:1494–1512. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Boratyn GM, Camacho C, Cooper PS, Coulouris G, Fong A, Ma N, et al. BLAST: a more efficient report with usability improvements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:W29–W33. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Elmore MG, Groves CL, Hajimorad MR, Stewart TP, Gaskill MA, Wise KA, et al. Detection and discovery of plant viruses in soybean by metagenomic sequencing. Virol J. 2022;19:1–24. doi: 10.1186/s12985-022-01872-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984;81:8014–8018. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.24.8014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vieira J, Messing J. The pUC plasmids, an M13mp7-derived system for insertion mutagenesis and sequencing with synthetic universal primers. Gene. 1982;19:259–268. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(82)90015-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Edgar RC. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004;5:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Muhire BM, Varsani A, Martin DP. SDT: a virus classification tool based on pairwise sequence alignment and identity calculation. PLoS One. 2014;9:e108277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stewart LR, Willie K. Maize yellow mosaic virus interacts with maize chlorotic mottle virus and sugarcane mosaic virus in mixed infections, but does not cause maize lethal necrosis. Plant Dis. 2021;105:3008–3014. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-20-2088-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Krueger EN, Beckett RJ, Gray SM, Miller WA. The complete nucleotide sequence of the genome of barley yellow dwarf virus-RMV reveals it to be a new Polerovirus distantly related to other yellow dwarf viruses. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:205. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Miller WA, Lozier Z. Yellow dwarf viruses of cereals: taxonomy and molecular mechanisms. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2022. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-121421-125135. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 41.Zerbini FM, Briddon RW, Idris A, Martin DP, Moriones E, Navas-Castillo J, et al. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Geminiviridae. J Gen Virol. 2017;98:131–133. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shepherd DN, Martin DP, Van Der Walt E, Dent K, Varsani A, Rybicki EP. Maize streak virus: an old and complex “emerging” pathogen. Mol Plant Pathol. 2010;11:1–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00568.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.King AMQ, Adams MJ, Lefkowitz EJ. Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses : ninth report of the international committee on taxonomy of viruses. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011.
- 44.Wright EA, Heckel T, Groenendijk J, Davies JW, Boulton MI. Splicing features in maize streak virus virion- and complementary-sense gene expression. Plant J. 1997;12:1285–1297. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.12061285.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Heyraud-Nitschke F, Schumacher S, Laufs J, Schaefer S, Schell J, Gronenborn B. Determination of the origin cleavage and joining domain of geminivirus rep proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23:910–916. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.6.910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Stanley J. Analysis of African cassava mosaic virus recombinants suggests strand nicking occurs withinthe conserved nonanucleotide motif during the initiation of rolling circle DNA replication. Virology. 1995;206:707–712. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6822(95)80093-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Palmer KE, Rybicki EP. The molecular biology of Mastreviruses. Adv Virus Res. 1998:183–234. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 48.Agindotan BO, Domier LL, Bradley CA. Detection and characterization of the first north American mastrevirus in switchgrass. Arch Virol. 2015;160:1313–1317. doi: 10.1007/s00705-015-2367-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Fontenele RS, Alves-Freitas DMT, Silva PIT, Foresti J, Silva PR, Godinho MT, et al. Discovery of the first maize-infecting mastrevirus in the Americas using a vector-enabled metagenomics approach. Arch Virol. 2018;163:263–267. doi: 10.1007/s00705-017-3571-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Medina CGV, Vaghi Medina CG, Teppa E, Bornancini VA, Flores CR, Marino-Buslje C, et al. Tomato apical leaf curl virus: a novel, monopartite Geminivirus detected in tomatoes in Argentina. Front Microbiol. 2018;8:2665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 51.Boukari W, Alcalá-Briseño RI, Kraberger S, Fernandez E, Filloux D, Daugrois J-H, et al. Occurrence of a novel mastrevirus in sugarcane germplasm collections in Florida, Guadeloupe and Réunion. Virol J. 2017;14:146. doi: 10.1186/s12985-017-0810-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Koonin EV, Ilyina TV. Geminivirus replication proteins are related to prokaryotic plasmid rolling circle DNA replication initiator proteins. J Gen Virol. 1992;73(Pt 10):2763–2766. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-73-10-2763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nash TE, Dallas MB, Reyes MI, Buhrman GK, Ascencio-Ibañez JT, Hanley-Bowdoin L. Functional analysis of a novel motif conserved across geminivirus rep proteins. J Virol. 2011;85:1182–1192. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02143-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Arguello-Astorga G, Lopez-Ochoa L, Kong L-J, Orozco BM, Settlage SB, Hanley-Bowdoin L. A novel motif in geminivirus replication proteins interacts with the plant retinoblastoma-related protein. J Virol. 2004;78:4817–4826. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.9.4817-4826.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gorbalenya AE, Koonin EV. Viral proteins containing the purine NTP-binding sequence pattern. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17:8413–8440. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.21.8413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zaagueri T, Miozzi L, Mnari-Hattab M, Noris E, Accotto GP, Vaira AM. Deep sequencing data and infectivity assays indicate that chickpea chlorotic dwarf virus is the etiological agent of the “hard fruit syndrome” of watermelon. Viruses. 2017;9:311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 57.Adams MJ, Antoniw JF, Bar-Joseph M, Brunt AA, Candresse T, Foster GD, et al. The new plant virus family Flexiviridae and assessment of molecular criteria for species demarcation. Arch Virol. 2004;149:1045–1060. doi: 10.1007/s00705-004-0304-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Liu J, Simon AE. Identification of novel 5′ and 3′ translation enhancers in Umbravirus-like coat protein-deficient RNA replicons. J Virol. 2022;96:e0173621. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01736-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zuker M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3406–3415. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Johnson PZ, Kasprzak WK, Shapiro BA, Simon AE. RNA2Drawer: geometrically strict drawing of nucleic acid structures with graphical structure editing and highlighting of complementary subsequences. RNA Biol. 2019;16:1667–1671. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2019.1659081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Asiimwe T, Stewart LR, Willie K, Massawe DP, Kamatenesi J, Redinbaugh MG. Maize lethal necrosis viruses and other maize viruses in Rwanda. Plant Pathol. 2020;69:585–597. doi: 10.1111/ppa.13134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Website. Virus Taxonomy: 2021 Release [https://talk.ictvonline.org/taxonomy/]. Accessed 15 July 2022.
- 63.Lin H-X, Xu W, Andrew WK. A multicomponent RNA-based control system regulates subgenomic mRNA transcription in a Tombusvirus. J Virol. 2007;81:2429–2439. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01969-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Simon AE, Miller WA. 3′ cap-independent translation enhancers of plant viruses. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2013;67:21–42. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Cimino PA, Nicholson BL, Wu B, Xu W, Andrew WK. Multifaceted regulation of translational Readthrough by RNA replication elements in a Tombusvirus. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002423. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Syller J. Molecular and biological features of umbraviruses, the unusual plant viruses lacking genetic information for a capsid protein. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2003;63:35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2003.08.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Andrews RJ, Roche J, Moss WN. ScanFold: an approach for genome-wide discovery of local RNA structural elements-applications to Zika virus and HIV. PeerJ. 2018;6:e6136. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Xu Y, Ju H-J, DeBlasio S, Carino EJ, Johnson R, MacCoss MJ, et al. A stem-loop structure in open Reading frame 5 (ORF5) is essential for Readthrough translation of the coat protein ORF stop codon 700 bases upstream. J Virol. 2018;92:e01544–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 69.Chay CA, Gunasinge UB, Dinesh-Kumar SP, Miller WA, Gray SM. Aphid transmission and systemic plant infection determinants of barley yellow dwarf luteovirus-PAV are contained in the coat protein readthrough domain and 17-kDa protein, respectively. Virology. 1996;219:57–65. doi: 10.1006/viro.1996.0222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Brault V, van den Heuvel JF, Verbeek M, Ziegler-Graff V, Reutenauer A, Herrbach E, et al. Aphid transmission of beet western yellows luteovirus requires the minor capsid read-through protein P74. EMBO J. 1995;14:650–659. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07043.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Gray S, Gildow FE. Luteovirus-aphid interactions. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2003;41:539–566. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.012203.105815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Liu J, Carino E, Bera S, Gao F, May JP, Simon AE. Structural analysis and whole genome mapping of a new type of plant virus subviral RNA: Umbravirus-like associated RNAs. Viruses. 2021;13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during the current study are available in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA accession: PRJNA753546). Sequences for the identified novel viruses NAMaMV, TaBV, MaTV, and MaUV can be found at the NCBI GenBank database under accession numbers MZ852895, OK018178, OK018181, and OK018180, respectively.