Skip to main content
Antibiotics logoLink to Antibiotics
. 2022 Oct 22;11(11):1454. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11111454

Rational Use of Ceftriaxone in Necrotizing Fasciitis and Mortality Associated with Bloodstream Infection and Hemorrhagic Bullous Lesions

Hung-Yen Chen 1, Tsung-Yu Huang 2,3,4, Jiun-Liang Chen 1,3, Liang-Tseng Kuo 1,3, Kuo-Chin Huang 1,3, Yao-Hung Tsai 1,3,*
Editor: Mehran Monchi
PMCID: PMC9686534  PMID: 36358109

Abstract: Background

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is an uncommon life-threatening necrotizing skin and soft tissue infection. The formation of hemorrhagic bullae is a special skin sign of NF. The purposes of this study were to investigate the incidence of hemorrhagic bullae formation and bacteremia associated with different organisms, to appraise the appropriate use of ceftriaxone, and to compare the clinical and laboratory risk indicators of NF patients with Gram-positive and Gram-negative infections on the initial examination. Methods: From March 2018 to December 2020, there were seventy-four NF patients with positive monomicrobial bacterial cultures enrolled based on surgical confirmation, and were categorized into two groups: the Gram-positive group and the Gram-negative group. Ceftriaxone susceptibility tests were carried out using the standard disk diffusion technique. Data, such as demographics, clinical outcomes, microbiological results, presentations of hemorrhagic bullae, and laboratory findings, were compared among these two groups. Results: The Gram-negative group included 52 patients, of whom 6 patients died, resulting in a mortality rate of 11.5%. The Gram-positive group included 22 patients and none died. Patients with bacteremia, hemorrhagic bullae, shock, fever, higher segmented forms and banded forms, and lower platelet counts constituted higher proportions in the Gram-negative group than in the Gram-positive group. The multivariate analysis identified six variables for the differentiation of Gram-negative and Gram-positive NF: the presentation of bacteremia, hemorrhagic bullae, shock at first consultation, fever with body temperature > 38.5 °C, band forms > 0%, and segmented forms ≦ 74%. A total of 66 isolates (89.2%) was susceptible to ceftriaxone. Conclusions: Gram-negative NF patients were significantly associated with hemorrhagic bullae presentation, blood stream infection, and mortality. Physicians should be alert to NF patients with the appearance of bacteremia, shock, fever, higher WBC banded and segmented forms, and lower platelet counts at the emergency department, with patients revealed to more likely have Gram-negative infections. Ceftriaxone with/without other appropriate antibiotics under the supervision of infectious doctors appeared to be clinically effective for the treatment of NF and blood stream infections.

Keywords: necrotizing fasciitis, bloodstream infection, hemorrhagic bullae, monomicrobial, Gram-negative, ceftriaxone

1. Introduction

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a life-threatening skin and soft tissue infection, and even with a better understanding of the pathophysiology of this devastating infection, mortality remains high [1,2,3,4]. Patients with necrotizing fasciitis presenting with bacteremia, hemorrhagic bullae, subcutaneous bleeding, purpura, necrosis, and gangrene need to be diagnosed early at the time of presentation in the emergency room. Hemorrhagic bullae is a special skin sign that can be crucial for identifying and recognizing necrotizing fasciitis; moreover, it can even be the cause of devastating consequences [5,6,7,8,9]. The early recognition and diagnosis of NF using skin bullous lesions, purple skin discoloration, hypotension, and elevated laboratory markers can allow for the initiation of proper treatment strategies to decrease mortality rates [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].

Vibrio spp. was reported as the leading causative pathogen of NF and related fatalities in our institution, which is located in a warm-water coastal region in southwest Taiwan; therefore, we established a treatment strategy, including emergency fasciotomy or amputation, antibiotic therapy with a third-generation cephalosporin plus tetracycline, and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for patients with fulminant necrotizing fasciitis [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. NF-associated bloodstream infections, especially of the Vibrio and Aeromonas species, are commonly found in our institution, and have been proven to increase mortality [15,17,18]. Although many studies have clearly demonstrated the mortality rate of different pathogens and treatment protocols, the knowledge surrounding the relationships between hemorrhagic bullae, bacteremia, and organisms is still lacking.

Vancomycin, linezolid, or clindamycin plus imipenem, meropenem, ampicillin/sulbactam, tigecycline and piperacillin/tazobactam, or ceftriaxone–metronidazole have been recommended for the initial antibiotic regimen for treating necrotizing fasciitis [19,20,21,22,23]. Our previous study advised the usage of ceftriaxone with/without other regimens at the first suspicion of necrotizing fasciitis to cover Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic organisms [18]. However, ceftriaxone resistance has been increasing in the past decade, and the most reported strains have been the Klebsiella species, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella Typhi, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Staphylococcus aureus [24,25,26]. Although these ceftriaxone-resistant pathogens might cause NF, the usage of ceftriaxone regarding the efficacy and safety in NF patients upon arrival to the emergency department remains questionable.

The purposes of this study were to investigate the incidence of hemorrhagic bullae formation and bacteremia associated with different organisms, to appraise the appropriate use of ceftriaxone, and to compare the clinical and laboratory risk indicators of NF patients with Gram-positive and Gram-negative infections on the initial examination.

2. Results

2.1. Microbiological Findings and Hemorrhagic Skin Presentation in NF Patients

According to the microbiological findings, the culture results from the wounds or blood specimens were classified into monomicrobial, polymicrobial, and no growth, in which 109 patients were included in this study. Eight patients died, resulting in a mortality rate of 7.3% (Table 1). Sixty patients presented hemorrhagic bullous formation, and forty-nine patients showed nonhemorrhagic skin lesions at the time of patient arrival at the emergency department or at the time of consultation in the hospital ward. All eight dead patients were revealed to have hemorrhagic bullous lesions. There were six patients with a polymicrobial infection and five of them were revealed to have hemorrhagic bullae.

Table 1.

Mortality and microbiology in patients with necrotizing fasciitis.

No. of Hemorrhagic Nonhemorrhagic Bacteremia Mortality
Variable Patients Bullae Skin Lesions
Monomicrobial Infection 74 50 24 39 6 (8.1%)
Gram-positive pathogens 22 7 15 0 0 (0%)
MRSA 5 4 1 0 0
MSSA 10 2 8 0 0
Streptococcus dysgalactiae 4 1 3 0 0
Corynebacterium falsenii 1 0 1 0 0
Staphylococcus epidermidis 1 0 1 0 0
Bacillus 1 0 1 0 0
Gram-negative pathogens 52 43 9 39 6 (11.5%)
Vibrio vulnificus 40 32 8 31 3
Vibrio cholerae non-O1 1 1 0 0 1
Vibrio parahemolytics 1 1 0 1 0
Aeromonas hydrophila 4 4 0 1 1
Aeromonas sobria 1 1 0 1 0
Klebsiella pneumonia 2 1 1 2 1
Serratia marcescens 1 1 0 1 0
Escherichia coli 1 1 0 1 0
Achromobacter xylosoxidans 1 1 0 1 0
Polymicrobial Infection 6 5 1 1 0 (0%)
No growth 29 5 24 0 2 (6.9%)
Total 109 60 49 40 8 (7.3%)

Seventy-four patients were found to have a monomicrobial infection (67.9%). Among the bacterial species identified, the Vibrio species was the most dominant pathogen (42 patients, 38.5%), followed by methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (10 patients, 9.2%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (5 patients, 4.6%), Aeromonas spp. (5 patients, 4.6%), and Streptococcus dysgalactiae (4 patients, 3.7%). Six NF patients with a monomicrobial infection died, for which the pathogens responsible were Vibrio vulnificus (n = 3), Vibrio cholerae non-O1 (n = 1), Aeromonas hydrophila (n = 1), and Klebsiella pneumonia (n = 1) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow chart of NF patient inclusion.

The pathogens identified in the polymicrobial cultures were Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS), β-hemolytic Streptococcus, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterococcus faecalis, Parvimonas micra, Atropobium parvulum, Morganella morganii, and Klebsiella pneumonia. None of the patients with polymicrobial NF died. Bacterial growth was absent in 29 patients, of whom 5 presented with hemorrhagic bullae and 2 died.

Broad-spectrum antibiotics were initially administered to patients diagnosed with necrotizing fasciitis in the emergency room; ceftriaxone and doxycycline were prescribed in 33 cases, ceftriaxone alone in 67 cases, ceftriaxone and vancomycin in 6 case, piperacillin and vancomycin in 1 case, amoxicillin in 1 case, and clindamycin in 1 case. These antibiotics were continued after surgery and changed to antibiotics specially targeting cultured bacteria under the supervision of infectious doctors.

2.2. Patient Characteristics in the Gram-Negative Group

The mean age of the Gram-negative group was 69.7 years (range, 27 to 92 years). Six patients died a mean of 12.1 days after admission, resulting in a mortality rate of 11.5%. All patients initially underwent fasciotomy and debridement. One patient with a Klebsiella pneumonia infection had a below-the-knee amputation performed, and one patient with a Vibrio vulnificus infection underwent an above-the-knee amputation after a few days due to progressive skin involvement following fasciotomy. Fifteen patients received skin grafts and twenty-eight patients underwent a repeated debridement with wound care after initial fasciotomy. Seven patients did not undergo any surgery following fasciotomy, and three of them died.

Twenty-four patients had a history of hepatic dysfunction (liver cirrhosis, hepatitis B or C, hepatic cell carcinoma, or alcoholic liver disease) with/without other medical comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, cancer, steroid usage, or gout). Ten patients had diabetes mellitus with/without other medical conditions. Five patients reported a history of heart disease, such as heart failure, hypertension, and coronary heart disease. Three patients had gout, two had steroid intake, two had chronic kidney disease, and one had colon cancer. Five patients did not have any chronic illnesses. Nineteen patients had a systolic blood pressure of ≤90 mmHg, and another nineteen patients had a body temperature of >38.5 °C.

Regarding positive cultures in the Gram-negative group, 13 were identified in wounds, 17 in blood, and 22 in both wounds and blood. The majority of Gram-negative pathogens was Vibrio vulnificus, which could easily cause hemorrhagic bullae and blood steam infections. There were 39 patients presenting bacteremia, of whom 5 died. Hemorrhagic bullous lesions were present in 43 patients, and 6 of them died (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Skin lesions in patients with Gram-negative necrotizing fasciitis. (A) A 75 year-old patient with Vibrio vulnificus infection revealed to have hemorrhagic bullae lesions on left leg. (B) A 86 year-old male with Aeromonas hydrophila in wound culture of left leg revealed to have hemorrhagic bullae lesions. (C) A 81 year-old female with Serratia marcescens infection presented with lower right leg hemorrhagic bullae lesions. (D) A 78 year-old male with Aeromonas sobria infection in blood and wound cultures revealed to have lower right leg hemorrhagic bullae lesions.

2.3. Patient Characteristics in the Gram-Positive Group

The Gram-positive group had a mean age of 64.5 years (range of 47–84 years). All positive cultures were identified in wounds, and none of the patients died. All patients initially received a fasciotomy. Seven patients received skin grafts, and thirteen patients underwent a repeated debridement. Two patients received wound care without further surgical management.

One patients had hepatitis C and diabetes mellitus. Six patients had a history of hepatic dysfunction with or without other comorbidities. Four patients had gout, three had diabetes mellitus, two had chronic kidney disease, and two had a steroid intake. One had seborrheic dermatitis, and one had parkinsonism. Two patients did not reported any underlying diseases. None of these patents were revealed to have a blood stream infection, and seven patients were observed to have hemorrhagic bullous lesions (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Skin lesions in patients with Gram-positive necrotizing fasciitis. (A) A 70 year-old female with MRSA infection revealed to have lower right leg hemorrhagic bullae lesions. (B) A 77 year-old female with Streptococcus dysgalactiae in wound culture of left hand revealed to have nonhemorrhagic bullae lesions. (C) A 54 year-old male with MSSA infection presented with nonhemorrhagic bullae on lower left leg. (D) A 59 year-old male with Corynebacterium infection revealed to have lower right leg nonhemorrhagic bullae lesions.

2.4. Antibiotic Susceptibility and Resistance of Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Pathogens

Isolates of Vibrio vulnificus, Vibrio parahemolytics, Klebsiella pneumonia, Escherichia coli, and Serratia marcescens were susceptible to amikacin, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ertapenem, levofloxacin, and tetracycline. The Vibrio cholerae non-O1 isolate was susceptible to ceftriaxone, but resistant to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim, and tetracycline. The isolates of five Aeromonas patients were susceptible to amikacin (AMK), ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, ertapenem, and gentamicin. Three Aeromonas isolates were susceptible to ertapenem and tetracycline; however, two isolates were resistant to them. An Achromobacter xylosoxidans isolate was susceptible to ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, colistin, imipenem, and levofloxacin, with resistance to amikacin, ciprofloxacin, cefepime, and gentamicin.

Except for MRSA, Corynebacterium falsenii, and Bacillus, 15 isolates of Gram-positive pathogens were susceptible to oxacillin, ampicillin, clindamycin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, and ceftriaxone. All MSSA isolates were resistant to erythromycin and penicillin, two Streptococcus dysgalactiae isolates were resistant to clindamycin and erythromycin, and one Staphylococcus epidermidis isolate was resistant to oxacillin and penicillin.

A total of 66 isolates (89.2%) was susceptible to ceftriaxone with either Gram-positive or Gram-negative pathogens (Table 2).

Table 2.

Susceptible and resistant antibiotics in monomicrobial necrotizing fasciitis.

No. of Ceftriaxone- Ceftriaxone- Other Antibiotic-
Variable Patients Susceptible Resistant Resistant
Gram-positive pathogens 22 16 6
  MRSA 5 0 5 OXA, AMP, ERY, CLI
  MSSA 10 10 0 ERY, PEN
  Streptococcus dysgalactiae 4 4 0 CLI, ERY
  Corynebacterium falsenii 1 0 1 CAP, ERY, CIP
  Staphylococcus epidermidis 1 1 0 OXA, PEN
  Bacillus 1 0 1 PEN, TRC, ERY, AMP
Gram-negative pathogens 52 51 1
  Vibrio vulnificus 40 40 0 None
  Vibrio cholerae non-O1 1 1 0 AMP, CAP, SMX–TMP, TRC
  Vibrio parahemolytics 1 1 0 CFU, CEZ, CIP
  Aeromonas hydrophila 4 4 0 ERT, TRC
  Aeromonas sobria 1 1 0 ERT, TRC
  Klebsiella pneumonia 2 2 0 None
  Serratia marcescens 1 1 0 CFU, CEZ
  Escherichia coli 1 1 0 None
  Achromobacter xylosoxidans 1 0 1 AMK, CIP, CEF, GM
Total 74 66 6

OXA, oxacillin; ERY, erythromycin; AMP, ampicillin; CLI, clindamycin; PEN, penicillin; CAP, chloramphenicol; SMX-MP, sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim; TRC, tetracycline; CFU, cefuroxime; CEZ, cefazolin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; ERT, ertapenem; AMK, amikacin; CEF, cefepime; GM, gentamicin.

2.5. Comparison of Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Groups

The patients with Gram-negative NF had a significantly higher incidence of bacteremia, shock, fever, higher banded and segmented forms of white blood cell (WBC) counts, and lower platelet counts than patients with Gram-positive NF infections in the emergency room (Table 2). Gram-negative pathogens caused significantly higher presentations of bacteremia and hemorrhagic bullae, which were associated with death (Table 3). The multivariate analysis identified six variables for differentiating Gram-negative and Gram-positive NF: the presentation of bacteremia, hemorrhagic bullae, shock at first consultation, fever with a body temperature of > 38.5 °C, band forms of WBC > 0%, and segmented forms of WBC ≦ 74% (Table 4).

Table 3.

Comparison between the Gram-negative NF group and Gram-positive NF group for characteristics and laboratory data at first consultation in the ER.

Gram-Negative Group
(N = 52)
Gram-Positive Group
(N = 22)
p Value
Age (years) 69.7 64.5
Sex
  Male 38 15
  Female 14 7
Mortality rate (%) 11.5 0
  Deaths 6 0
  Survivals 46 22
Positive culture
  Wound 13 22
  Blood 17 0
  Wound and blood 22 0
Isolates of ceftriaxone susceptible 51 15
Presentation of bacteremia 39 0 0.0001 *
  Death 5 0
Presentation of hemorrhagic bullae a 43 7 0.0001 *
  Death 6 0
  Survivals 37 7
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) a 0.0004 *
  ≦90 19 0
  >90 33 22
Body temperature (°C) a 0.023 *
  >38.5 19 2
  <38.5 33 20
White blood cell Mean 13,528.8 ± 8497.7 16,195.4 ± 6614.1 0.19
  counts (cells/mm3) b
Band forms (%) b Mean 8.3 ± 9.8 3.6 ± 6.4 0.04 *
  0 9 9 0.0406 *a
  >0 43 13
Segmented forms (%) b Mean 76.8 ± 14.7 84.3 ± 7.9 0.026 *
  ≦74 17 2 0.0425 *a
  >74 35 20
Lymphocyte forms (%) b Mean 8.1 ± 6.0 6.3 ± 4.4 0.19
Platelet counts (per mm3) b Mean 134,815 ± 72,698 247,636 ± 154,001 0.0001 *
  ≦150,000 26 6 0.08 a
  >150,000 26 16
Albumin (g/dL) b Mean 3.49 ± 0.68 3.71 ± 0.49 0.16

* mean p < 0.05 and the difference was significant; values were expressed as number of patients and median (SD); a Fisher’s exact test; b t-test.

Table 4.

Diagnostic risk factors for differentiation of Gram-negative and Gram-positive monomicrobial necrotizing fasciitis identified with multivariate analysis.

Odds Ratio p Value a
Variable (95% Confidence Interval)
  Bacteremia 131.667 (7.461–2321.745) 0.0009 *
  Hemorrhagic bullae 10.238 (3.244–32.314.925) 0.0001 *
  Systolic blood pressure ≦ 90 mmHg 26.194 (1.504–456.271) 0.0251 *
  Body temperature > 38.5 5.758 (1.211–27.381) 0.0278 *
  Band forms > 0% 0.302 (0.099–0.920) 0.0351 *
  Segmented forms ≦ 74% 4.857 (1.016–23.226) 0.0477 *

* mean p < 0.05 and the difference was significant; adjusted ORs and 95% CIs were estimated using multivariate logistic regression. a Fisher’s exact test.

3. Discussion

Monomicrobial necrotizing fasciitis was reported to have increased in incidence in the recent decade, especially Gram-negative NF, reported to have more progressive clinical courses and a higher mortality than Gram-positive NF [15,18,27,28,29,30]. Cutaneous features of NF were divided into three stages, and hemorrhagic bullae appeared in the third stage [5,6]. Wang et al. reported that 68% patients developed hemorrhagic bullae on the fourth day; however, our patients commonly presented with hemorrhagic bullous skin lesions upon arrival to the ER [5]. Thus, the appearance of hemorrhagic bullae was an important diagnostic criteria for NF in our institution, especially in those patients with Vibrio and Aeromonas infections [7,8,9,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Many of the literature had proved that Gram-negative NF had a significant higher prevalence of bloodstream infections than Gram-positive NF [9,13,14,15,28,29,30,31]. In this study, we demonstrated that Gram-negative NF with hemorrhagic bullae presentation and bacteremia was significantly associated with poor prognosis, which should be considered first when patients are revealed to have quickly progressing and fulminant features at the ER.

Besides emergent surgical interventions, appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotics were also an important strategy for NF patients at first onset. Ceftriaxone is one of the commonly utilized antibiotics due to its commendable antibacterial efficacy and excellent activity against many Gram-negative and most Gram-positive bacteria in patients with bacteremia, pneumonia, a urinary tract infection, necrotizing soft tissue infection, bone and joint infections, and bacterial meningitis [29,30,31,32,33]. Although the increasing prevalence of ceftriaxone-resistant Gram-negative pathogens has been reported as a concerning issue in critically ill patients, ceftriaxone is still recommended to be effective for blood stream infections and various community-acquired infections due to its excellent safety profile in many literatures [24,25,26,34,35,36,37]. Our study demonstrated that 89.2% of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens was susceptible to ceftriaxone. We also observed that Gram-negative NF patients had a higher incidence of bloodstream infections (39/52), and nearly all Gram-negative pathogens (51/52) were susceptible to ceftriaxone. With the emergence of surgical interventions and appropriate antibiotics under the supervision of infectious doctors, the mortality rate of 15.4% during the 4-year period from 2007 to 2010 was reduced to a mortality rate of 7.3% during a 3-year period from 2018 to 2020. The rational use of ceftriaxone with/without other antibiotics as an empirical therapy in necrotizing fasciitis and bloodstream infections could be verified to have sufficient clinical efficacy.

NF requires teams to work towards acting swiftly on early suspicions, conducting immediate surgical interventions, and providing aggressive care, which can successfully decrease mortality; therefore, clinical presentations and laboratory risk indicators are more important for the rapid recognition and management of NF [7,8,9,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. In this prospective study, we confirmed that NF patients with any two or more indicators, including a presentation of bacteremia, hemorrhagic bullous lesions, shock at first consultation, fever with a body temperature of > 38.5 °C, band forms of > 0%, and segmented forms of ≦ 74%, at the time of the initial consultation in the ER or ward should be assumed to have the Gram-negative infection first, due to being capable of causing more devastating outcomes.

A strength of this study was that we prospectively took pictures of every NF patient’s lesions on arrival to the ER, and were defined as hemorrhagic or nonhemorrhagic skin lesions by two doctors (Y.H.T. and T.Y.H.) to increase the reliability of the assessment.

There were several limitations to our study. First, the number of enrolled patients was still too small, and a further multi-institutional cohort study may be needed. Second, 26.7% of our NF patients had no bacterial growth found in blood or wound specimens. Many molecular methods, such as the simple polymerase chain reaction (PCR), multiplex PCR, real-time PCR, nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and oligonucleotide DNA microarray, can be considered for the detection of diverse pathogens.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patient Selection

We conducted a prospective cohort study and evaluated those patients who were initially diagnosed with NF of the limbs by emergency medicine doctors, and who had an excisional fasciotomy or an immediate limb amputation performed by orthopedic surgeons between March 2018 and December 2020 in Chia-Yi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Routine blood cultures were collected at the ER, and wound specimens were obtained with sterile cultrate swabs during surgery. The cultured specimens of patients were confirmed with a microbiologic evaluation a few days after surgery, and were classified as a monomicrobial infection, polymicrobial infection, and no growth. We excluded those patients with prosthetic joint infections, surgical complicated wounds, osteomyelitis, and pre-existing chronic ulcers.

4.2. Diagnosis and Treatment Protocol

NF was defined by the surgically findings of the presence of grayish necrotic soft tissue and hemorrhagic bullae, the loss of resistance in normally adherent fascia to digital blunt dissection, and the appearance of pus with a foul dishwater odor. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were initially administered to all patients, and an emergent fasciotomy or immediate limb amputation was immediately performed in other cases when necrotizing fasciitis was diagnosed.

4.3. Clinical Assessment

Demographic data, including the presentation of hemorrhagic bullae, nonhemorrhagic serous-filled bullae, and mortality, were reviewed for each patient according to microbiological findings. To assess clinical outcomes after treatment, mortality was defined as death due to progressive sepsis or medical complications within 6 months after the first surgery.

Further, we enrolled NF patients with monomicrobial infections and categorized them into two groups: the Gram-positive group and the Gram-negative group. Differences in mortality, clinical outcomes, laboratory findings, antibiotic resistance, the presentation of bacteremia, and the presentation of hemorrhagic bullae were compared between the Gram-positive and Gram-negative groups.

4.4. Microbiology Laboratory Procedures

Isolates of pathogens from primary cultures were identified by their colonial appearance, Gram stain, agglutination with specific antisera, and with conventional biochemical tests used in clinical microbiology laboratories. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) was used to identify those isolates to a species level.

The antimicrobial susceptibility of pathogens was analyzed in the hospital’s microbiology laboratory via the standard disk diffusion technique. These antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), and the results were interpreted according to the CLSI criteria for these microorganisms. When the antimicrobial susceptibility test of the isolate revealed resistance in more than one antibiotic, the isolate of the patient was recorded to be an antibiotic-resistant case.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with the use of Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) Version 18.0 statistical software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). We used the two-tailed t-test for continuous variables and the Fisher exact test for categorical variables to examine the significant relationships between risk factors and outcomes between the Gram-positive and Gram-negative groups. To identify the diagnostic risk indicators, multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the relative effect of variables by calculating unadjusted odds ratios for categorical outcomes. A value of p < 0.05 (two tailed) was considered significant.

5. Conclusions

NF patients accompanied by hemorrhagic bullae presentations and blood stream infections appeared to were associated with Gram-negative bacteria infections and mortality. Physicians should be alert to NF patients with the appearance of bacteremia, shock, fever, higher WBC banded and segmented forms, and lower platelet counts at the emergency department, which were revealed to more likely have the Gram-negative infection. Ceftriaxone with/without other appropriate antibiotics under the supervision of infectious doctors appeared to have a clinical effectiveness for the treatment of NF and bloodstream infection.

Abbreviations

NF: necrotizing fasciitis; ER, emergency room; CLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; S. aureus, Staphylococcus aureus; V. vulnificus, Vibrio vulnificus; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus; ICU, intensive care unit; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; WBC, white blood cell.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-Y.C.; Methodology, Y.-H.T.; Software, J.-L.C.; Validation, T.-Y.H. and J.-L.C.; Formal Analysis, L.-T.K.; Investigation, H.-Y.C.; Resources, Y.-H.T.; Data Curation, K.-C.H.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, H.-Y.C.; Writing—Review and Editing, K.-C.H.; Visualization, Y.-H.T.; Supervision, T.-Y.H.; Project Administration, Y.-H.T.; Funding Acquisition, T.-Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (202001656B0 and 201801530B1B0) of the Chang Gung Medical Foundation in Taiwan.

Informed Consent Statement

Consent was obtained from all patients involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the author (orma2244@adm.cgmh.org.tw) on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

None of the authors report any potential conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by grants from the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan (grant no. CMRPG6L0071 and CMRPG6H0641) to Tsung-Yu Huang.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Wong C.H., Chang H.C., Pasupathy S., Khin L.W., Tan J.L., Low C.O. Necrotizing fasciitis: Clinical presentation, microbiology, and determinants of mortality. JBJS. 2003;85A:1454–1460. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200308000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fontes R.A., Jr., Ogilvie C.M., Miclau T. Necrotizing soft-tissue infections. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2000;8:151–158. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200005000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Elliott D., Kufera J.A., Myers R.A. The microbiology of necrotizing soft tissue infections. Am. J. Surg. 2000;179:361–366. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00360-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Morgan M.S. Diagnosis and management of necrotising fasciitis: A multiparametric approach. J. Hosp. Infect. 2010;75:249–257. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang Y., Wong C., Tay Y. Staging of necrotising fasciitis based on the evolving cutaneous features. Int. J. Dermatol. 2007;46:1036–1041. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.03201.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kiat H.J., Natalie Y.H.E., Fatimah L. Necrotizing fasciitis: How reliable are the cutaneous signs? J. Emerg. Trauma. Shock. 2017;10:205–210. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_42_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hsiao C.T., Lin L.J., Shiao C.J., Hsiao K.Y., Chen I.C. Hemorrhagic bullae are not only skin deep. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2008;26:316–319. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu B.M., Hsiao C.T., Chung K.J., Kung C.T., Hung S.C., Liu P.P. Hemorrhagic bullae represent an ominous sign for cirrhotic patients. J. Emerg. Med. 2008;34:277–281. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.02.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Huang T.Y., Tsai Y.H., Kuo L.T., Hsu W.H., Hsiao C.T., Hung C.H., Huang W.Y., Wu H.R., Chuang H.J., Li Y.Y., et al. Different types of bullae of limbs with necrotizing fasciitis predict different outcome: A prospective study. Infection. 2021;49:135–144. doi: 10.1007/s15010-020-01559-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cohen L., Kang H., Sochol K., Cohen S., Ghiassi A., Stevanovic M., Lefebvre R. Differentiating upper extremity necrotizing soft tissue infection frome serious cellulitis and abscess. Cureus. 2021;13:e17806. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fernando S.M., Tran A., Cheng W., Rochwerg B., Kyeremanteng K., Seely A.J., Inaba K., Perry J.J. Necrotizing soft tissue infections: Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination, imaging, and LRINEC score. Ann. Surg. 2019;269:58–65. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tsai Y.H., Hsu R.W., Huang K.C., Huang T.J. Laboratory indicators for early detection and surgical treatment of Vibrio necrotizing fasciitis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010;468:2230–2237. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1311-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tsai Y.H., Huang T.Y., Chen J.L., Hsiao C.T., Kuo L.T., Huang K.C. Bacteriology and mortality of necrotizing fasciitis in a tertiary coastal hospital with comparing risk indicators of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vibrio vulnifcus infections: A prospective study. BMC. Infect. Dis. 2021;21:771. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06518-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hsiao C.T., Weng H.H., Yuan Y.D., Chen C.T., Chen I.C. Predictors of mortality in patients with necrotizing fasciitis. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2008;26:170–175. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huang T.Y., Peng K.T., Hsu W.H., Hung C.H., Chuang F.Y., Tsai Y.H. Independent Predictors of Mortality for Aeromonas Necrotizing Fasciitis of Limbs: An 18-year Retrospective Study. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:7716. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64741-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tsai Y.H., Huang T.Y., Kuo L.T., Chuang P.Y., Hsiao C.T., Huang K.C. Comparison of surgical outcomes and predictors in patients with monomicrobial necrotizing fasciitis caused by Vibrio vulnificus, Aeromonas hydrophila and Aeromonas sobria. Surg. Infect. 2022;23:288–297. doi: 10.1089/sur.2021.337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tsai Y.H., Hsu R.W.W., Huang K.C., Huang T.J. Comparison of necrotizing fasciitis and sepsis caused by Vibrio vulnificus and Staphylococcus aureus. JBJS. 2011;93:274–284. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tsai Y.H., Huang K.C., Shen S.H., Hsu W.H., Peng K.T., Huang T.J. Microbiology and surgical indicators of necrotizing fasciitis in a tertiary hospital of southwest Taiwan. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2012;16:e159–e165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2011.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stevens D.L., Bryant A.E. Necrotizing soft-tissue infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:2253–2265. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1600673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pelletier J., Gottlieb M., Long B., Perkins J.C., Jr. Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI): Pearls and pitfalls for the emergency clinician. J. Emerg. Med. 2022;62:480–491. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Montravers P., Snauwaert A., Welsch C. Current guidelines and recommendations for the management of skin and soft tissue infections. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2016;29:131–138. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Urbina T., Razazi K., Ourghanlian C., Woerther P.L., Chosidow O., Lepeule R., de Prost N. Antibiotics in Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections. Antibiotics. 2021;10:1104. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10091104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rampal S., Ganesan T., Sisubalasingam N., Neela V.K., Tokgöz M.A., Arunasalam A., Halim M.A.H.A., Shamsudin Z.B., Kumar S., Sinniahet A. Local trends of antibiotic prescriptions for necrotizing fasciitis patients in two tertiary care hospitals in central malaysia. Antibiotics. 2021;10:1120. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10091120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Boutrot M., Azougagh K., Guinard J., Boulain T., Barbier F. Antibiotics with activity against intestinal anaerobes and the hazard of acquired colonization with ceftriaxone-resistant Gram-negative pathogens in ICU patients: A propensity score-based analysis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019;74:3095–3103. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gelaw L.Y., Bitew A.A., Gashey E.M., Ademe M.N. Ceftriaxone resistance among patients at GAMBY teaching general hospital. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:12000. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16132-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tewabe A., Marew T., Birhanu G. The Contribution of nano-based strategies in overcoming ceftriaxone resistance: A literature review. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2021;9:e00849. doi: 10.1002/prp2.849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yahav D., Duskin-Bitan H., Eliakim-Raz N., Ben-Zvi H., Shaked H., Goldberg E., Bishara J. Monomicrobial necrotizing fasciitis in a single center: The emergence of Gram-negative bacteria as a common pathogen. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2014;28:13–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rahim G.R., Gupta N., Maheshwari P., Singh M.P. Monomicrobial Klebsiella pneumoniae necrotizing fasciitis: An emerging life-threatening entity. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019;25:316–323. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Park S.Y., Yu S.N., Lee E.J., Kim T., Jeon M.H., Choo E.J., Park S., Chae J.W., Bang H.I., Kim T.H. Monomicrobial gram-negative necrotizing fasciitis: An uncommon but fatal syndrome. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019;94:183–187. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huang T.Y., Peng K.T., Hsiao C.T., Fann W.C., Tsai Y.H., Li Y.Y., Hung C.H., Chuang F.Y., Hsu W.H. Predictors for gram-negative monomicrobial necrotizing fasciitis in southern Taiwan. BMC. Infect. Dis. 2020;20:60. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4796-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Timsit J.F., Ruppe E., Barbier F., Tabah A., Bassetti M. Bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: An expert statement. Intensive. Care Med. 2020;46:266–284. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05950-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wong G., Taccone F., Villois P., Villois P., Scheetz M.H., Rhodes N.J., Briscoe S., McWhinney B., Nunez-Nunez M., Ungerer J., et al. β-Lactam pharmacodynamics in gram-negative bloodstream infections in the critically ill. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020;75:429–433. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Duncan C.J.A., Barr D.A., Seaton R.A. Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy with ceftriaxone, a review. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 2012;34:410–417. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9637-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kamfose M.M., Muriithi F.G., Knight T., Lasserson D., Hayward G. Intravenous ceftriaxone versus multiple dosing regimes of intravenous anti-staphylococcal antibiotics for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA): A systematic review. Antibiotics. 2020;9:39. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9020039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Alsowaida Y.S., Saleh Y., Benitez G., Saleh K.B., Almangour T.A., Shehadeh F., Mylonakis E. Effectiveness and safety of ceftriaxone compared to standard of care for treatment of bloodstream infections due to Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Antibiotics. 2022;11:375. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11030375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yetmar Z.A., Razi S., Nayfeh T., Gerberi D.J., Mahmood M., Abu Saleh O.M. Ceftriaxone versus antistaphylococcal antibiotics for definitive treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2022;59:106486. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hirai Y. Treatment options for gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria: Focus on ceftriaxone. Clin. Med. Rev. Ther. 2011;3:215–234. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the author (orma2244@adm.cgmh.org.tw) on reasonable request.


Articles from Antibiotics are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES