Skip to main content
Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI logoLink to Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI
. 2022 Nov 17;12(22):3186. doi: 10.3390/ani12223186

Temperature Incubation Influences Gonadal Gene Expression during Leopard Gecko Development

Maria Michela Pallotta 1,2,*, Chiara Fogliano 2,*, Rosa Carotenuto 2
Editor: Ettore Olmo
PMCID: PMC9686823  PMID: 36428413

Abstract

Simple Summary

Environmental sex determination is a modality of sex determination related to external factors and that has implicated determinants such as climatic conditions, which act on the embryo after fertilization and deposition of the egg. For reptiles, the temperature is the main element for sex determination; this factor affects laid eggs in different ways. Details remain to be elucidated concerning the temporal gene expression and the functions of their protein products. Therefore, the aim of the present work was to determine the genetic determinants differentially represented during the embryonic development of a model species already known in temperature-dependent sex determination, the leopard gecko Eublepharis macularius. Following this investigation, new data were acquired on genes expressed in the sexual differentiation of E. macularius. In addition, new genes potentially involved in the mechanisms of tissue and metabolic sexual differentiation of the embryo of this species have been identified. This study could bring new useful information in order to correctly interpret the regulatory pathway underlying the determination of sex in vertebrates.

Abstract

During development, sexual differentiation results in physiological, anatomical and metabolic differences that implicate not only the gonads but also other body structures. Sex in Leopard geckos is determined by egg incubation temperature. Based on the premise that the developmental decision of gender does not depend on a single gene, we performed an analysis on E. macularius to gain insights into the genes that may be involved in gonads’ sexual differentiation during the thermosensitive period. All the genes were identified as differentially expressed at stage 30 during the labile phase of sex differentiation. In this way, the expression of genes known to be involved in gonadal sexual differentiation, such as WNT4, SOX9, DMRT1, Erα, Erβ, GnRH, P450 aromatase, PRL and PRL-R, was investigated. Other genes putatively involved in sex differentiation were sought by differential display. Our findings indicate that embryo exposure to a sex-determining temperature induces differential expression of several genes that are involved not only in gonadal differentiation, but also in several biological pathways (ALDOC, FREM1, BBIP1, CA5A, NADH5, L1 non-LTR retrotransposons, PKM). Our data perfectly fit within the new studies conducted in developmental biology, which indicate that in the developing embryo, in addition to gonadal differentiation, sex-specific tissue and metabolic polarization take place in all organisms.

Keywords: lizard, sex determination, incubation temperature, gonadal differentiation

1. Introduction

In many organisms, sex is determined by the presence of heteromorphic chromosomes and by factors encoded by them, which establish balances between specific regulatory patterns. In mammals, for example, the SRY factor linked to the sex chromosome Y is decisive for testicular differentiation [1]: in these cases, we speak of genotyping sex determination (GSD). Several cases of GSD exist: one of the best known is that of D. melanogaster [2], in which sex determination depends on the ratio of the number of X sex chromosomes to the number of autosomes A. Sexual development in mammals, on the other hand, is a more complex process and is independent of the ratio of the number of sex/autosomal chromosomes present in the individual’s genome but originates from the presence/absence of the Y chromosome [3], from which derives a transcript, Sex-determining region Y protein (SRY), which, by interacting with factors such as SRY-box containing gene 9 (Sox9), Sf1 and Dmrt1 (dsx and mab-3-related transcription factor 1) [4] controls the differentiation of the bipotential gonad in the male direction in embryos with XY chromosomes. There is another possibility of sex determination, which is dependence on environmental factors (environmental sex determination—ESD). The latter is related to factors external to the organism’s genome and sees implicated determinants, such as climatic conditions, which act on the embryo after fertilization and deposition of the egg [5]. Reptiles, unlike some birds and mammals, exhibit sex determination that is both dependent on sex chromosomes and dependent on external factors [6]. The modes of GSD include at least three different conditions of heterogametes. When we talk about environmental determinants, we refer, for reptiles, to temperature as the main one; this factor affects laid eggs in different ways. The prerequisite for the persistence of ESD in reptiles seems to be related to the thermally heterogeneous environment, in which the natural and different incubation temperatures of the different microenvironments in which eggs are laid ensure the determination and development of both gonads and the physiological characterization of the male and female sexes. Granting that temperature can act as a motive for the activation of specific pathways that induce sex differentiation [7], it is possible to assume the existence of a period during egg incubation when the embryo is temperature sensitive (TSP) [8]. Although several genetic factors are important for sex determination and are regulated by temperature, details remain to be elucidated in regard to temporal gene expression and the functions of their protein products [9].

Reptiles are among the organisms that tolerate temperature variations worst [10,11]. To date, however, information on the gene and molecular network that would guide gonadogenesis in these species remains limited, both regarding the different components and regarding their respective functions. Even in mammals, the lack of data on all genes expressed during the early stages of gonadal development has limited the ability to delineate the complete pathway of genes that would regulate the early stages of ovary development [12,13]. The aim of the present work was mainly to individuate which are the genetic determinants differentially represented during the embryonic development of a model species, the leopard gecko (Eublepharis macularius), a well-known model in the study of the mechanisms of embryonic development and temperature-dependent sex determination [14,15,16]. The possible variation in expression of genes involved in gonad differentiation and in other pathways was then evaluated. All the genes were identified as differentially expressed at stage 30 during the labile phase of sex differentiation [17]. For our aims, we used differential display (DDRT-PCR), and the results obtained were validated by means of real-time PCR. Since the use of model species has proved useful for identifying new genetic factors and understanding their mechanisms of action, the study of reptiles could bring new useful information in order to correctly interpret the regulatory pathway underlying the determination of the sex in vertebrates.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

Two females and one male specimen of E. macularius were housed in a terrarium at the Department of Biology of Università di Napoli “Federico II”, according to the institution’s Animal Welfare Office guidelines and policies and to international rules and to the recommendations of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the American National Institutes of Health and of the Italian Health Ministry. The experimental protocol was approved by the institutional Animal Experiments Ethics Committee (Centro Servizi Veterinari) (permit number: 2014/0017970). Fertilization occurred naturally. Every month (May, June and July), after fertilization, each female deposed two eggs. Each experiment was technically replicated three times. Each pair of eggs (6 pairs, 12 eggs in total) were collected and immediately placed in two precision incubators (±0.1 °C) set to a constant temperature of 26 °C (FPT, six eggs) or 32.5 °C (MPT, six eggs), for 7 days, roughly corresponding to stage 30 [17]. Temperature and moisture were monitored daily using HOBO temperature loggers (Onset Computer Corporation, Pocassett, MA, USA).

2.2. RNAs

Each embryo (N = 12; 6 from MPT and 6 from FPT derived from two females and deposed in different months) were eviscerated, and the area strictly adjacent to the not fully formed gonads was taken. Total RNA was extracted from each single embryo according to the TRI-Reagent protocol (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). The concentration and purity of RNA samples were determined by UV absorbance spectrophotometry; RNA integrity was checked by 2.0% agarose gel electrophoresis. RNA extracted from the 12 embryos at stage 30, the stage in which the undifferentiated gonad is sensible to the temperature [17], was subdivided between qRT-PCR (N = 6; 3 from MPT and 3 from FPT) and DDRT-PCR (N = 6; 3 from MPT and 3 from FPT). First-strand cDNA, used for all amplification reactions, was synthesized from singularly extracted RNA from each MPT and FPT embryo, then utilized to obtain 1 μg of total RNA using Super Script III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) and used for the two screening protocols [16].

2.3. Expression Analysis of Genes Involved in Gonadal Sex Differentiation

Differential expression analysis of nine genes involved in gonadal sex differentiation, estrogen receptor α (Erα), estrogen receptor β (Erβ), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), P450 aromatase, prolactin (PRL), prolactin receptor (PRL-R), Wnt family member 4 (WNT4), sex determining region Y-Box 9 (SOX9) and doublesex and Mab-3 related transcription factor 1 (DMRT1) was carried out by quantitative RT (qRT) PCR using primers designed on vertebrate sequences found in GenBank. Sequences of interest were aligned by using a Multiple Sequence Alignment free software (http://www.genome.jp/tools-bin/clustalw, accessed on 10 November 2022) and primers designed on the sequence regions with the highest degree of identity by means of Primer 3Plus software (http://www.bioinformatics.nl/cgibin/primer3plus/primer3plus.cgi, accessed on 10 November 2022) (Table 1) [16].

Table 1.

Primers used in the qRT-PCR analysis performed to validate the expression profiles of the studied genes.

Gene Oligo Forward Sequence (5′-3′) Oligo Reverse Sequence (5′-3′)
Erα CACCCTGGAAAGCTGTTGTT TTCGGAATCGAGTAGCAGTG
Erβ ATCCCGGCAAGCTAATCTTT CAGCTCTCGAAACCTTGAAGT
GnRH GTCTTGCTGGCCTCTCCTC GTGGTCTCCTGCCAGTGTTC
P450 aromatase TGAACACCCTCAGTGTGGAA TCAGVTTTGGCATGTCTTCA
PRL AAGGCCATGGAGATTGAGG GGAGGCCTGACCAAGTAGAA
PRL-R ATGGAGGTCTCCCCACTAAT AACAGGAATTGGGTCCTCCT
WNT4 CTGCAACAAGACCTCCAAGG AGCAGCACCGTGGAATTG
SOX9 GGGCAAGCTTTGGAGGTTAC TGGGCTGGTACTTATAGTCTGGA
DMRT1 GCAGGGGATCCTACCAAAGT AGAAGGCAGCAAGCTCAAGA
ALDOC TACCATGGTGTTGTGCAAGC CTTCACGCTGCATTTTCTCA
FREM1 GGAATGTCAACCAAGATGTGG CAGGGGAGATCAGAACCACT
BBIP1 CGTGAGCTGTAGCTTTGCAG CTGCCTTACCCACAGCACTT
CA5A TTGCAAAGTTATGGGGAGGA TCAAGCAGGGTTTATTTCTCATC
NADH5 GCTACAGGTAAATCCGCTCAA AGTAGGGCAGAAACGGGAGT
L1 non-LTR retrotransposons ATCATCGTGGGCCTCTTTGC AGCAGCACCGTGGAATTG
PKM AGAGCTGCTTGTACGCCTGT CCAGATTTCCAAAGGACAGTG

2.4. DDRT-PCR

Differential display allows one to compare and identify changes in gene expression at the mRNA level between two or more cell populations. Briefly, RNA was reverse transcribed using anchored oligo-dT primers designed to specifically bind to the 5′ ends of the poly-A tails. Successively, cDNAs were amplified by using the anchored oligo-dT primers in combination with a series of arbitrary 5‘ primers and amplification products, then separated and visualized by electrophoresis. For our purpose, RT-PCR and PCR were performed using the RNA spectra kit and fluorescent mRNA Differential Display System (GenHunter® Corporation, Nashville, TN, United States). RNA extracted from each MPT embryo (N = 3) was then utilized to obtain 1 μg of total RNA, and the same was performed for the FPT embryo (N = 3). After extraction, total RNA was reverse-transcribed in two 20 μL reaction mixtures at 37 °C for 60 min using MMLV reverse transcriptase and a set of three one-base anchored oligo(dT) primers (H-T11A/C/G). MPT and FPT cDNA fragments were amplified using combinations of the anchored H-T11 primers from the reverse transcription step and eight different AP upstream primers (Table 2).

Table 2.

Sequences of the 3 oligo (dT) primers and 5 arbitrary primers (H-AP) used in differential display.

Primers Sequence
3′ oligo (dT) H-T11G AAGCTTTTTTTTTTTG
3′ oligo (dT) H-T11A AAGCTTTTTTTTTTTA
3′ oligo (dT) H-T11C AAGCTTTTTTTTTTTC
H-AP1 AAGCTTGATTGCC
H-AP2 AAGCTTCGACTGT
H-AP3 AAGCTTTGGTCAG
H-AP4 AAGCTTCTCAACG
H-AP5 AAGCTTAGTAGGC
H-AP6 AAGCTTGCACCAT
H-AP7 AAGCTTAACGAGG
H-AP8 AAGCTTTTACCGC

The DNA fragments differentially amplified by DDRT-PCR were purified from agarose gel using WIZARDR SV Gel and the PCR Clean-Up System (Promega, Milano, Italy). The purified fragments were T/A inserted into Vector pCRR 4-TOPOR and cloned into Escherichia coli DH5α using a TOPOR TA CloningR Kit for Sequencing (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Plasmids were extracted by Fast Plasmid Mini Kit (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Sequencing was performed by Primmbiotech srl (Milan, Italy). Sequences were queried against the NCBI database using Nucleotide BLAST tool and related to known proteins using the tBLASTX algorithm and gene ontology hierarchy [16].

2.5. Confirmation of Differential Gene Expression: Real-Time PCR

qRT-PCR analysis was performed on all the genes of interest, using the same RNA samples employed for the experiments, as previously described. All the primers used for qRT-PCR (Table 1) were designed using the software Primer 3Plus (http://www.bioinformatics.nl/cgiin/primer3plus/primer3plus.cgi, accessed on 10 November 2022). qRT-PCR reactions were carried out using iTaqTM Universal SYBR Green Supermix kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) in a final reaction volume of 20 μL. For transcript quantification, samples were normalized to the expression level of the endogenous reference gene (GAPDH) to take into account possible differences in cDNA quantity and quality. The amplification protocol involved one cycle at 95 °C for 10 min, to activate Taq DNA polymerase, and 40 cycles consisting of a denaturation step at 95 °C for 15 s and annealing and extension steps at 60 °C for 1 min [16]. Reactions were conducted in an iCycler iQ5 system. The magnitudes of change in gene expression relative to males were determined by the 2ΔΔCt method of Livak and Schmittgen [18]. Statistical significance was determined using a t-test analysis with the Holm–Sidak correction for multiple comparison method using GraphPad Prism 6.0.7 software.

3. Results

3.1. Genes Involved in Gonadal Sex Differentiation

Nine transcript fragments of E. macularius genes, which are critical for SD in mammals and other vertebrates (Erα, Erβ, GnRH, P450 aromatase, PRL, PRL-R, WNT4, SOX9 and DMRT1), were amplified by qRT-PCR from RNA of leopard-gecko embryos incubated at sex-specific temperatures and sacrificed at 7 (stage 30) days. In gonads of stage 30, PRL-R appeared more expressed in embryos incubated at 26 °C (FPT); WNT4, SOX9 and DMRT1 were more expressed at 32.5 °C (MPT). Erα, Erβ, GnRH and P450 aromatase did not exhibit any statistically significant differential expression (Figure 1). At this stage, we failed to detect expression of PRL by qRT-PCR.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Expression analysis of genes canonically involved in sexual differentiation by qRT-PCR. mRNA levels of FPT embryos are related to MPT embryos. Data are presented as mean with SD. Statistical significance was determined using t-tests with Holm–Sidak correction for multiple comparison. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

3.2. Identification and Expression Analysis of Seven New Transcripts by DDRT-PCR

In analysis of the arbitrary primers provided in the kit, only four (H-AP2, H-AP5, H-AP6, and H-AP7) yielded expression profiles containing bands that were differently expressed (Figure 2). The sequences of these cloned fragments (Supplementary Table S1) were compared to those found in Genbank and Embl using BLASTN and TBLASTX. Some correspondence with: Anolis carolinensis pyruvate kinase muscle isozyme-like, Gekko japonicus aldolase fructose-bisphosphate C (ALDOC), Anolis carolinensis FRAS1-related extracellular matrix protein 1-like, Anolis carolinensis BBSome-interacting protein 1-like, Sphaerodactylus townsendi carbonic anhydrase 5A (CA5A), NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 (mitochondrion) of Hemitheconyx caudicinctus and L1 non-LTR retrotransposons of A. carolinensis, were found (Table 3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Representative gel image of DDRT-PCR band pattern. The image shows amplifications of cDNA from gonad embryos performed using a 5′ arbitrary primer (H-AP5) in combination with 3′ oligo (dT) H-T11A primer on male (Ma) and female (Fa) embryos.

Table 3.

Sequence analysis of differentially expressed mRNAs isolated by DDRT-PCR.

Clone E-Value Length (BP) Identity (%) Results
McAP2 e−121 450 98% Gekko japonicus, aldolase fructose-bisphosphate C (ALDOC)
Ma1AP5 2e−41 528 83% Anolis carolinensis, pyruvate kinase muscle isozyme-like (PKM)
Ma2AP5 2e−60 710 95% Anolis carolinensis, FRAS1 related extracellular matrix 1 (FREM1)
FaAP5 4e−148 1011 73% Hemitheconyx caudicinctus, NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 (mitochondrion) (NADH-CoQ reduttasii)
McAP5 1e−144 592 83% Anolis carolinensis, BBSome-interacting protein 1-like (BBIP1)
Fg1AP6 9e−15 137 77% Sphaerodactylus townsendi, carbonic anhydrase 5A (CA5A)
FcAP7 1e−14 202 76% Aanolis carolinensis, L1 non-LTR retrotransposons

3.3. qRT-PCR Expression Analysis of Genes Identified by DDRT-PCR

All the data collected by DDRT-PCR were validated using qRT-PCR, which partially confirmed the results obtained with the method (Table 4). At stage 30, differential expression was confirmed for six of the seven genes identified: CA5A and L1 non-LTR expression were stronger in embryos incubated at the FPT, whereas PKM, FREM1, BBIP1 and ALDOC appeared to be expressed more strongly in MPT. Equal expression levels of NADH5 were found in male and female embryonic gonads (Figure 3).

Table 4.

Summary of the differentially expressed genes in E. macularius embryo at stage 30, listed according to the two different methodologies used. MPT stands for genes more expressed at a male-producing temperature and FPT stands for genes more expressed at a female-producing temperature.

Gene Identification Embryo Gonads Stage 30
Erα qRT-PCR No differential expression
Erβ qRT-PCR No differential expression
GnRH qRT-PCR No differential expression
P450 aromatase qRT-PCR No differential expression
PRL qRT-PCR Not detected
PRL-R qRT-PCR FPT
WNT4 qRT-PCR MPT
SOX9 qRT-PCR MPT
DMRT1 qRT-PCR MPT
ALDOC DDRT-PCR MPT
FREM1 DDRT-PCR MPT
BBIP1 DDRT-PCR MPT
CA5A DDRT-PCR FPT
NADH5 DDRT-PCR No differential expression
L1 non-LTR retrotransposons DDRT-PCR FPT
PKM DDRT-PCR MPT

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Validation of DDRT-PCR by qRT-PCR. Data are presented as mean with SD. Statistical significance was determined using t-tests with Holm–Sidak correction for multiple comparisons. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

4. Discussion

In the animal world, it is usually the genome that provides adequate instructions for the embryonic development of morphological structures; however, in some cases, such as in reptiles, the environment can drive morphogenesis events by modulating the expression of specific genes. Temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) makes some reptile species ideal models for acquiring information on the space-time path of gene activation. Up to now, the information on the genes that trigger the gene and molecular network at the basis of vertebrate gonadogenesis is still incomplete. Even in mammals, the lack of data on genes expressed during the early stages of gonadal development has limited the possibility of drawing a definitive framework for the genes that would regulate the early stages of ovarian development [12]. It is known that, in the early stages of embryonic development, some important genes involved in sexual differentiation are expressed in a sex-specific way.

Sox9, which is part of the family of transcription factors with the HMG box, equivalent to the SRY of mammals, is expressed in E. macularius only a few days after deposition, at stage 28–30, which, in this species, presumably corresponds to the beginning of the temperature-sensitive period (TSP). Sox9 could, therefore, have a role in this species in determining the initiation of gonadal differentiation, and its expression found in both gonadal sketches not yet differentiated could therefore trigger this process. Subsequently, its expression decreases in the female embryonic gonad, remaining constant in the male one of some species, until the end of the temperature-sensitive period, or increasing, in others, during the testicular morphogenesis phase [19]. The high degree of identity of the Sox9 sequence in mammals, birds, fish and reptiles, even in geckos, suggests, however, that there is conservation of its function in all vertebrates.

Wnt4, which acts in antagonism with Sox9, seems to guide the differentiation pattern of the ovary. Surprisingly, in the analyzed samples, in stages 28 and 29 it was more expressed in the embryo at MDT than in the one held at FDT. In Trachemis scripta, the species that gave the greatest amount of information related to the pathway underlying the reptilian TSD, similar expression levels in males and females for Wnt4 were found at the beginning of the TSP phase, stages 16–19 [20]. In this species, Wnt4 appears to be over-expressed in females only during ovarian differentiation.

The expression of DAX is also highly variable. In organisms with TSD that have been studied, Dax shows a species-specific trend. It is initially expressed at similar levels in MSD and FSD in all species. It was localized, by WISH, both from Muller’s duct and from Wolff’s duct. It then decreases dramatically during embryonic development in T. scripta [21] and L. olivacea [18]; it increases slightly in the alligator, A. mississipiensis [22], and in C. picta [23]; but it remains constant in C. serpentina [20].

Such a variable trend suggests that Dax has different functions in the various organisms, or that, in these functions, it may have activation timing that does not necessarily correspond in the various species. In the leopard gecko, it was not possible to detect the presence of DAX in the early stage we studied; this could agree with an actual involvement of this gene in later stages of gonadal formation. For Dmrt1, which is involved in determining the formation of the testicle, the results obtained confirmed what is known in the literature: even if only in minimal quantities, its expression is detectable in males from the beginning of embryonic development [21]. In fact, in situ hybridizations of Dmrt1 on embryonic gonads of Podarcis sicula at 7 days from fertilization show no signals, but the gene is clearly expressed both in the ovary and in the embryonic testis at a later stage, at about 15 days, and then expression is localized only in the testicle until hatching [24]. Dmrt1 has been the subject of in-depth analysis, as it is considered one of the oldest genes in the sex determination of vertebrates. In fact, genes belonging to the DM family are considered phylogenetically close to dS of D. melanogaster and Mab3 of C. elegans. The expression of Dmrt1 is considered not only important for guiding the correct development of the testicle in the embryo but also for maintaining correct testicular function in the adult. Additionally, the expression of the estrogen receptors Er-b is clearly present in E. macularius embryos from stage 28–30, in both MSD and FSD, without variations. Since these genes are also involved in determining the proper development of the central nervous system and in morphogenesis in general, their early activation may be required to perform these additional functions. During the LP phase (stage 30), the temperature seems to affect aromatase activity and synthesis of estrogens. These data were found not only for the gonads but also for other body structures, such as the brain [17]. Our work is in accordance with previous studies that by utilizing differential display, highlighted how temperatures induced differential expression of several genes involved not only in gonadal differentiation but also, for example, in neural differentiation, in basal metabolic processes or in cell proliferation and differentiation [16]. In our case, we found a group of genes not strictly related to sexual differentiation that also displayed differential expression. One of the differentially expressed sequences, FcAP7, aligned with a portion belonging to the 3′ UTR region of a transposable element present in the genome of a reptile. The data, also validated by analysis for real-time PCR, are interesting because they confirm the presence of repeated elements transcribed during moments of cell differentiation, once again suggesting their probable role in the functionality of the genome. For the Ma1AP5 sequence, on the other hand, we found 83% similarity to the Anolis carolinensis pyruvate kinase muscle isozyme-like (PKM) sequence, and analysis using the EMBL database revealed similarity with ovarian and testis cDNA libraries of Anolis carolinensis. PKM is a glycolytic isozyme that catalyzes the transfer of a phosphoryl group from phosphoenolpyruvate to ADP, generating ATP [25]. Different enzymatic forms of it are known [26]; considering their implications in the phenomena of cell growth and proliferation and their involvement in some tumor pathologies [27], it could be hypothesized that the isolated enzyme form is an isozyme expressed only in the phase of embryonic development that could have a role in the induction of cell growth. The FRAS1-related extracellular matrix 1 transcript, with which the Ma2AP5 sequence aligns with 95% identity, is associated with craniofacial and renal embryonic formation and development, and its mutation leads precisely to renal agenesis in mice [28]. Given that the gonad and the kidney have the same embryonic origin, one could hypothesize a role of this transcript in the differentiation of the renal portion with respect to the induction of the differentiation of the primordial gonad. The sequence of the transcript of Anolis carolinensis BBSome-interacting protein 1-like was instead found following interrogation in the EMBL database (tBLASTx) with the McAP5 sequence (83% identity). We found that the query sequence shows high similarity to Anolis carolinensis cDNA libraries derived from transcripts present in the testes and primordial kidneys. The BBSome complex, which contains several isoforms of the BBSome-interacting protein, also forms a protein complex involved in cell trafficking, ciliogenesis and microtubular stability [29]. In Zhang et al. [30], the mutation of this protein is responsible for male infertility in mice due to defects in the formation of the sperm flagellum. Having observed, in the present study, greater expression of the transcript in the male embryo than the female embryo, one could hypothesize a role of BBSome-interacting protein 1-like in the induction of male differentiation of the primordial gonad and a default role in both embryos for cell communication.

Aldolase C fructose-bisphosphate (ALDOC, or ALDC) is an enzyme that, in humans, is encoded by the ALDOC gene on chromosome 17. This gene encodes a member of the class I fructose-bisphosphate aldolase gene family [31]. For the first time, this gene was found differentially expressed in male and female embryo gonads. This suggests that there are genes not yet studied during sexual development. CA5A (carbonic anhydrase 5A) is a protein-coding gene. Diseases associated with CA5A include carbonic anhydrase Va deficiency, hyperammonemia and carbonic anhydrase Va deficiency. Among its related pathways are metabolism and reversible hydration of carbon dioxide. CA5A was shown to be expressed in the ovaries of the Pelibuey breed of sheep; the gene was upregulated in a subset of ewes that gave birth to two lambs compared to uniparous animals [32]. The level of expression led the authors to conclude that CA5A is heritable and potentially an imprinted gene [33]. That result is in agreement with our findings. In fact, CA5A was more expressed in female embryo gonads.

5. Conclusions

Through the present study, new data have been acquired on genes expressed in the early stages of development and sexual differentiation in E. macularius. We demonstrated that not only genes related to sexual differentiation, but also genes involved in different developmental pathways, modify their expression in relation to breeding temperature. Our data perfectly fit within the new studies conducted in developmental biology, which indicate that in the developing embryo, in addition to gonadal differentiation, sex-specific tissue and metabolic polarization take place in all organisms. Further investigations will be necessary on embryos at later stages of embryonic development, in order to test the roles of traced transcripts in the determination of gonads and tissues, define any progressive variations in their levels of expression, identify other genes differentially expressed in the later stages of development and analyze their behavior during the reproductive life of the organism.

Acknowledgments

This contribution is dedicated to the memory of our friend and colleague Teresa Capriglione. We will cherish her memory forever.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani12223186/s1. Table S1. Nucleotide sequences identified by DDRT-PCR.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.P. and R.C.; methodology, M.M.P. and C.F.; software, M.M.P.; validation, M.M.P., C.F. and R.C.; formal analysis, M.M.P. and C.F.; investigation, M.M.P. and C.F.; resources, R.C.; data curation, M.M.P., C.F. and R.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.P. and C.F.; writing—review and editing, M.M.P., C.F. and R.C.; visualization, R.C.; supervision, R.C.; project administration, R.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

For this study, we used samples already collected for other previously published studies with the approval of institutional committees, and no further sampling was performed.

Data Availability Statement

The newly generated sequences are available in the Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Quinn A., Koopman P. The Molecular Genetics of Sex Determination and Sex Reversal in Mammals. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2012;30:351–363. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1324718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mullon C., Pomiankowski A., Reuter M. Molecular evolution of Drosophila Sex-lethal and related sex determining genes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2012;12:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Uguz C., Iscan M., Togan I. Developmental genetics and physiology of sex differentiation in vertabrates. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2003;14:9–16. doi: 10.1016/S1382-6689(03)00005-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barrionuevo F.J., Burgos M., Scherer G., Jiménez R. Genes promoting and disturbing testis development. Histol. Histopathol. 2012;27:1361–1383. doi: 10.14670/HH-27.1361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ciofi C., Swingland I.R. Environmental sex determination in reptiles. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1997;51:251–265. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01108-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Janzen F.J., Paukstis G.L. A preliminary test of the adaptive significance of environmental sex determination in reptiles. Evolution. 1991;45:435–440. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb04417.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Miller D., Summers J., Silber S. Environmental versus genetic sex determination: A possible factor in dinosaur extinction? Fertil. Steril. 2004;81:954–964. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Girondot M., Ben Hassine S., Sellos C., Godfrey M., Guillon J.-M. Modeling Thermal Influence on Animal Growth and Sex Determination in Reptiles: Being Closer to the Target Gives New Views. Sex. Dev. 2010;4:29–38. doi: 10.1159/000280585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Modi W.S., Crews D. Sex chromosomes and sex determination in reptiles: Commentary. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2005;15:660–665. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2005.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Valenzuela N. Multivariate Expression Analysis of the Gene Network Underlying Sexual Development in Turtle Embryos with Temperature-Dependent and Genotypic Sex Determination. Sex. Dev. 2010;4:39–49. doi: 10.1159/000277935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Du W.-G., Shine R., Ma L., Sun B.-J. Adaptive responses of the embryos of birds and reptiles to spatial and temporal variations in nest temperatures. Proc. R. Soc. Boil. Sci. 2019;286:20192078. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Piprek R.P. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Female Sex Determination—Antagonism Between Female and Male Pathway. Folia Biol. 2009;57:105–113. doi: 10.3409/fb57_3-4.105-113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yildirim E., Aksoy S., Onel T., Yaba A. Gonadal development and sex determination in mouse. Reprod. Biol. 2020;20:115–126. doi: 10.1016/j.repbio.2020.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Endo D., Kanaho Y.-I., Park M.K. Expression of sex steroid hormone-related genes in the embryo of the leopard gecko. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2008;155:70–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2007.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Valleley E.M., Cartwright E.J., Croft N.J., Markham A.F., Coletta P.L. Characterisation and expression ofSox9 in the Leopard gecko, Eublepharis macularius. J. Exp. Zool. 2001;291:85–91. doi: 10.1002/jez.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pallotta M.M., Turano M., Ronca R., Mezzasalma M., Petraccioli A., Odierna G., Capriglione T. Brain Gene Expression is Influenced by Incubation Temperature During Leopard Gecko (Eublepharis macularius) Development. J. Exp. Zool. Mol. Dev. Evol. 2017;328:360–370. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.22736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wise P.A., Vickaryous M.K., Russell A.P. An Embryonic Staging Table for in ovo Development of Eublepharis macularius, the Leopard Gecko. Anat. Rec. 2009;292:1198–1212. doi: 10.1002/ar.20945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Maldonado L.T., Piedra A.L., Mendoza N.M., Valencia A.M., Martínez A.M., Larios H.M. Expression profiles of Dax1, Dmrt1, and Sox9 during temperature sex determination in gonads of the sea turtle Lepidochelys olivacea. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2002;129:20–26. doi: 10.1016/S0016-6480(02)00511-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shoemaker C.M., Crews D. Analyzing the coordinated gene network underlying temperature-dependent sex determination in reptiles. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2009;20:293–303. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shoemaker C.M., Queen J., Crews D. Response of Candidate Sex-Determining Genes to Changes in Temperature Reveals Their Involvement in the Molecular Network Underlying Temperature-Dependent Sex Determination. Mol. Endocrinol. 2007;21:2750–2763. doi: 10.1210/me.2007-0263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Western P.S., Harry J.L., Graves J.A., Sinclair A.H. Temperature-dependent sex determination in the American alligator: Expression of SF1, WT1 and DAX1 during gonadogenesis. Gene. 1999;241:223–232. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00466-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Valenzuela N. Evolution of the gene network underlying gonadogenesis in turtles with temperature-dependent and genotypic sex determination. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2008;48:476–485. doi: 10.1093/icb/icn031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Capriglione T., Vaccaro M., Morescalchi M., Tammaro S., De Iorio S. Differential DMRT1 Expression in the Gonads of Podarcis sicula (Reptilia: Lacertidae) Sex. Dev. 2010;4:104–109. doi: 10.1159/000289579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ikeda Y., Noguchi T. Allosteric Regulation of Pyruvate Kinase M2 Isozyme Involves a Cysteine Residue in the Intersubunit Contact. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:12227–12233. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.20.12227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tsutsumi H., Tani K., Fujii H., Miwa S. Expression of L- and M-type pyruvate kinase in human tissues. Genomics. 1988;2:86–89. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(88)90112-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yang W., Xia Y., Ji H., Zheng Y., Liang J., Huang W., Gao X., Aldape K., Lu Z. Nuclear PKM2 regulates β-catenin transactivation upon EGFR activation. Nature. 2011;480:118–122. doi: 10.1038/nature10598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vrontou S., Petrou P., I Meyer B., Galanopoulos V.K., Imai K., Yanagi M., Chowdhury K., Scambler P., Chalepakis G. Fras1 deficiency results in cryptophthalmos, renal agenesis and blebbed phenotype in mice. Nat. Genet. 2003;34:209–214. doi: 10.1038/ng1168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Loktev A.V., Zhang Q., Beck J.S., Searby C.C., Scheetz T.E., Bazan J.F., Slusarski D.C., Sheffield V.C., Jackson P.K., Nachury M.V. A BBSome Subunit Links Ciliogenesis, Microtubule Stability, and Acetylation. Dev. Cell. 2008;15:854–865. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang Q., Nishimura D., Vogel T., Shao J., Swiderski R., Yin T., Searby C., Carter C.C., Kim G., Bugge K., et al. BBS7 is required for BBSome formation and its absence in mice results in Bardet-Biedl syndrome phenotypes and selective abnormalities in membrane protein trafficking. J. Cell Sci. 2013;126:2372–2380. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Juszczak G.R., Stankiewicz A.M. Glucocorticoids, genes and brain function. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2018;82:136–168. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hernández-Montiel W., Collí-Dula R.C., Ramón-Ugalde J.P., Martínez-Núñez M.A., Zamora-Bustillos R. RNA-seq Transcriptome Analysis in Ovarian Tissue of Pelibuey Breed to Explore the Regulation of Prolificacy. Genes. 2019;10:358. doi: 10.3390/genes10050358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pokharel K., Peippo J., Weldenegodguad M., Honkatukia M., Li M.-H., Kantanen J. Gene Expression Profiling of Corpus luteum Reveals Important Insights about Early Pregnancy in Domestic Sheep. Genes. 2020;11:415. doi: 10.3390/genes11040415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The newly generated sequences are available in the Supplementary Materials.


Articles from Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES