Skip to main content
Diagnostics logoLink to Diagnostics
. 2022 Nov 2;12(11):2668. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112668

Unusual Ileocecal Ulcers after Liver Transplantation for Hepatitis B Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Kang He 1,2,3,, Zhifeng Xi 1,2,3,, Qiang Xia 1,2,3,*
Editor: Ioana Gabriela Lupescu
PMCID: PMC9689070  PMID: 36359511

Abstract

We presented a case demonstrating ileocecal ulcers after liver transplantation for hepatitis B cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The patient presented 4 years post-transplant with paroxysmal right lower abdominal pain. Due to a mild increase in the leukocyte and neutrophil count, infectious diseases were initially suspected. However, probiotic treatment did not help improve the symptom. An enhanced CT scan revealed a thickening in the ileocecal region, and endoscopy later showed multiple giant and deep ulcers in the ileocecal region with polypoid hyperplasia. Histopathology of an ulcer biopsy displayed benign ulcers, and chronic inflammation with non-caseous granulomas, without signs of a fungus or parasite infection. Epithelial exfoliation with atypical hyperplasia was observed, and a tacrolimus-induced ileocecal ulcer was considered by a pathologist. Clinical manifestation, lab findings, radiology, and pathology characteristics of ulcers were not consistent with the pathogenesis of ischemia, tuberculosis, CMV, EBV, tumor, or inflammatory bowel diseases. Abdominal pain was gradually relieved and subsided with the discontinuation of tacrolimus and corticosteroid administration.

Keywords: liver transplantation, ileocecal ulcer, tacrolimus


A 39-year-old female with a history of HBV cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (within the Milan Criteria) received an orthotopic liver transplant in 2015. The post-transplant course was complicated by a recurrent biliary stricture treated two years later with ERCP. Neither hepatitis B nor hepatocellular carcinoma recurred after liver transplantation until now. However, the patient presented with paroxysmal right lower abdominal pain 4 years post-transplant. Coagulation function parameters were within the normal range. Laboratory indices on the hepatic, renal, cardiac, and respiratory functions were all normal. Blood and stool cultures for bacteria and fungus displayed no growth. Serological results and nucleic acids of CMV and EBV were negative. In addition, negative findings were revealed in the abdominal Doppler ultrasound. Probiotics and antispasmodic treatment did not help improve the symptom, even though a complete blood count revealed a mild increase in the leukocyte and neutrophil count. An enhanced CT scan revealed a thickening of the ileocecal region with the suspicion of inflammatory lesions (Figure 1A). Endoscopy in September 2019 showed multiple giant and deep ulcers in the ileocecal region with polypoid hyperplasia (Figure 1B). To rule out PTLD, a relatively common post-transplant complication, we performed PET-CT at the same time, 18F-FDG accumulation in the site of the wall thickening of the ileocecal region (Figure 1C). At that time, her labs showed well graft functions with tacrolimus and mycophenolate as immunosuppressants. Considering the common adverse gastrointestinal effects of mycophenolate after transplant, we empirically discontinued mycophenolate without any improvement in the abdominal pain.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The pre-treatment evaluation of patient’s ileocecal ulcer after admission. (A) Enhanced CT scan. (B) Endoscopy. (C) PET-CT.

Histopathology of the ulcer biopsy displayed benign ulcers and chronic inflammation with non-caseous granulomas (Figure 2A,B) without signs of a fungus or parasite infection. Epithelial exfoliation with atypical hyperplasia and apoptotic crypt cells were observed, and a tacrolimus-induced ileocecal ulcer was considered by a pathologist. Clinical manifestation, lab findings, radiology, and pathology characteristics of ulcers were not consistent with the pathogenesis of ischemia, PTLD, tuberculosis, CMV, EBV, HSV, tumor, inflammatory bowel diseases, or GVHD. The abdominal pain was gradually relieved and subsided with the discontinuation of tacrolimus and corticosteroid administration. Cyclosporin A was added due to an increase in liver enzymes, suggesting acute rejection. A colonoscopy and biopsy pathology at year 2 of the follow-up revealed significant healing of the ulcers in the ileocecal region (Figure 2C–F). Neither the recurrence of abdominal pain, acute rejection, nor biliary stricture was observed during the 3 years of follow-up.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A,B) The pre-treatment pathology results of ileocecal ulcer. (C,D) The post-treatment endoscopy images of ileocecal region. (E,F) The post-treatment pathology results of ileocecal region.

The differentiation of the ileocecal ulcer in post-transplant patients is always challenging [1,2,3,4,5]. Common and uncommon pathogenesis, such as infection, ischemia, inflammatory bowel disease, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders should be considered [6]. Endoscopic and pathologic features of tacrolimus-induced ileocecal ulcers are non-specific [7]. Although certain clinical and histological clues may arouse suspicion of it, as in this case, these will not always be present. Histology in isolation often does not provide a definitive diagnosis of tacrolimus-induced ileocecal ulcers. Hence, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary, as well as the collection of clinical information and drug history [8]. Tacrolimus, as well as other immunosuppressants, such as sirolimus or mycophenolate, can result in digestive tract mucosa injury and the development of ulcers [9,10]. However, the histopathologic changes induced by these immunosuppressants and how to differentially diagnose them have not been well characterized.

Erika Hissong reported that most patients with tacrolimus-related digestive tract injuries have endoscopically evident colitis with a variety of histologic features. Most biopsies show an active colitis pattern with apoptotic crypt cells. However, 40% of cases display chronic active colitis that simulates the characteristics of idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease, which causes lots of trouble with differentiation diagnosis [10]. Moreover, for pathologists, the interpretation of biopsy findings in this setting can be challenging because many patients taking tacrolimus are also administered with other immunosuppressants that can cause intestine or colon ulcers. Clinicians should be aware of this potential diagnosis because ulcers and abdominal pain are often resolved with drug cessation or by decreasing the drug dosage rather than therapy aimed at improving inflammatory bowel disease.

In conclusion, solid organ transplantation recipients are at risk of digestive tract injury, ulcers included. Particularly, severe complications such as bleeding or perforation could negatively impact the long-term outcome and sometimes become fatal. Immunosuppressants, such as tacrolimus, sirolimus, or mycophenolate, should be enrolled in the differential diagnosis. Our case can provide support for the idea that tacrolimus can cause ileocecum ulcers with characteristic patterns of inflammation. Discontinuing it or switching to other immunosuppressants could be the solution to dealing with these conditions.

Acknowledgments

We thank Qi Miao and Qi Feng for assisting with histology and radiology support.

Abbreviations

HBV Hepatitis B Virus
ERCP Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
CT Computed Tomography
CMV Cytomegalovirus
EBV Epstein–Barr Virus
PTLD Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders
GVHD Graft-Versus-Host Disease
PET-CT Positron Emission-Computed Tomography
18F-FDG 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose

Author Contributions

K.H.: Data curation, Writing—original draft; Z.X.: Data curation, Writing—review and editing; Q.X.: Conceptualization, Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request due to restrictions e.g., privacy or ethical.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the Project of the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (20204Y0012), the Seed Fund of Renji Hospital (RJZZ18-010), the Shenkang three-year action plan (SHDC2020CR2003A, SHDC2020CR5012), and the Project of Shanghai key clinical specialties (shslczdzk05801).

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Hamdeh S., Micic D., Hanauer S. Drug-Induced Colitis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021;19:1759–1779. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Villanacci V., Reggiani-Bonetti L., Leoncini G., Parente P., Cadei M., Albarello L., Mandelli G., Caputo A. Histopathology of Non-IBD Colitis. A practical approach from the Italian Group for the study of the gastrointestinal tract (GIPAD) Pathologica. 2021;113:54–65. doi: 10.32074/1591-951X-234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Farooqi R., Kamal A., Burke C. Mycophenolate-induced Colitis: A Case Report with Focused Review of Literature. Cureus. 2020;12:e6774. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pusztaszeri M.P., Genta R.M., Cryer B.L. Drug-induced injury in the gastrointestinal tract: Clinical and pathologic considerations. Nat. Clin. Pract. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2007;4:442–453. doi: 10.1038/ncpgasthep0896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Maes B.D., Dalle I., Geboes K.Y., Oellerich M., Armstrong V.W., Evenepoel P., Geypens B., Kuypers D., Shipkova M., Geboes K., et al. Erosive enterocolitis in mycophenolate mofetil-treated renal-transplant recipients with persistent afebrile diarrhea. Transplantation. 2003;75:665–672. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000053753.43268.F0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kimura K., Ikegami T., Bekki Y., Ninomiya M., Yamashita Y.I., Yoshizumi T., Yoshiya S., Soejima Y., Harada N., Shirabe K., et al. Clinical significance of gastrointestinal bleeding after living donor liver transplantation. Transpl. Int. 2014;27:705–711. doi: 10.1111/tri.12325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Herlihy N., Feakins R. Gut inflammation induced by drugs: Can pathology help to differentiate from inflammatory bowel disease? United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2022;10:451–464. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Smith A.D., Bai D., Marroquin C.E., Tuttle-Newhall J.E., Desai D.M., Collins B.H., Muir A., Kuo P.C., McHutchison J., Rockey D.C. Gastrointestinal hemorrhage due to complicated gastroduodenal ulcer disease in liver transplant patients taking sirolimus. Clin. Transplant. 2005;19:250–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00332.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guo Y.W., Gu H.Y., Abassa K.K., Lin X.Y., Wei X.Q. Successful treatment of ileal ulcers caused by immunosuppressants in two organ transplant recipients. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016;22:5616–5622. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i24.5616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hissong E., Mostyka M., Yantiss R.K. Histologic Features of Tacrolimus-induced Colonic Injury. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2022;46:118–123. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request due to restrictions e.g., privacy or ethical.


Articles from Diagnostics are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES