The authors wish to make the following correction to this paper [1]. There was a careless mistake in Figure 5 (calculated by using link-based data instead of the usual node-based data for this kavg(q) alone): the virtual scale was doubled. However, because of the comparison with the methods represented by colored lines, replacing this figure does not affect to the substantive meaning of the results obtained, including our conclusion, or anything other than the revised sentences.
Figure 5.
Average degree kavg(q) in the surviving Nq nodes vs. fraction q of attacks for the rate rh in rewirings. (a) SLR, RBR, GBR, RingBP, (b) RingBP, RingLimit5Recal, (c) RingBP, RingRecal, and (d) RingBP, RingLimit1,5,10 methods.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Reference
- 1.Hayashi Y., Tanaka A., Matsukubo J. More Tolerant Reconstructed Networks Using Self-Healing against Attacks in Saving Resource. Entropy. 2021;23:102. doi: 10.3390/e23010102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

