Skip to main content
Theranostics logoLink to Theranostics
. 2022 Oct 24;12(17):7404–7419. doi: 10.7150/thno.75279

Cerenkov radiation-activated probes for deep cancer theranostics: a review

Nian Liu 1,, Xinhui Su 1,, Xiaolian Sun 2,
PMCID: PMC9691350  PMID: 36438500

Abstract

Cerenkov radiation (CR) from radionuclides and megavoltage X-ray radiation can act as an in situ light source for deep cancer theranostics, overcoming the limitations of external light sources. Despite the blue-weighted emission and low quantum yield of CR, activatable probes-mediated CR can enhance the in-vivo diagnostic signals by Cerenkov resonance energy transfer and also can produce therapeutic effects by reactive species generation/drug release, greatly promoting the biomedical applications of CR. In this review, we describe the principles and sources of CR, construction of CR-activated probes and their application to tumor optical imaging and therapy. Finally, future prospects for the design and biomedical application of CR-activated probes are discussed.

Keywords: Cerenkov radiation, probes, deep cancer, theranostics, radionuclides, X-ray radiation

1. Introduction

Light-based diagnosis and treatment methods have developed rapidly: examples include fluorescence imaging, optoacoustic imaging, photothermal therapy, and photodynamic therapy (PDT) 1-5. However, these methods are less effective for deep tumors because of the rapid attenuation of light as it passes through tissue 6. To overcome this limitation, Cerenkov radiation (CR) from radionuclides and megavoltage X-ray radiation can serve as an in situ excitation source within deep tissues 7. Blue-weighted CR occurs when a charged particle travels faster than the speed of light in a given medium 8, 9. Improvements in optical imaging technology and the increasing sensitivity of CCD cameras allow the detection of blue-weighted CR photons for functional molecular imaging 10-11. Preclinical and clinical explorations of CR imaging have demonstrated its potential for high throughput, high sensitivity, and rapid imaging 12-17. Nevertheless, current CR-based imaging lacks the necessary depth because the blue-weighted CR photons do not penetrate deep enough to image certain tumors 10, 18.

Activatable probes-mediated CR provides a way to enhance the diagnostic signals or produce therapeutic effects 19, 20. These optical probes participate in Cerenkov resonance energy transfer (CRET) to red-shift emission into the near-infrared (NIR) region or red region of the visible spectrum, enabling sensitive detection from deeper inside the tissue. Besides, some activatable probes can produce therapeutic effects at greater depths: for example, ultraviolet (UV)-responsive probes can be activated by CR to produce therapeutic reactive species or to release drugs, referred to as CR-induced therapy (CRIT) 21. The combination of activatable probes and CR expands the biomedical applications of CR.

In this review, we summarize CR-activated probes that have been reported to enhance optical imaging and therapy. CR efficiently triggers these optical probes with red-shifted emission, which include quantum dots, gold nanoclusters, lanthanide-based downconversion probes, persistent luminescence nanoparticles (PLNPs), and organic dye-associated NPs. The CR-induced PDT, photoimmunotherapy, drug release and even combinations of these therapies are also discussed in detail.

2. Cerenkov radiation

2.1 Principles of CR

CR is generated through the interaction of charged particles and matter 9. It can be produced from radionuclides, megavoltage X-ray radiation, cosmic events and nuclear reactors; clinical facilities may have access to radionuclides and linear accelerators 19. The radionuclides release α, β, or γ particles during the decay, and the subatomic particles are charged when polarizing the medium. A similar process occurs in megavoltage X-ray radiation, except that the kinetic energy of the resulting electrons is 2-3 orders of magnitude greater when they pass through tissue 15.

When a charged particle travels faster than the speed of light through a dielectric medium, the surrounding molecules in the medium become locally polarized. After the particles pass through the medium, the molecules return to their ground state and release blue-weighted light called CR (Figure 1) 15, 19. CR intensity is related to the velocity and energy of the charged particles (υ), as well as the refractive index of the medium (c). The threshold of input energy needed to generate CR can be described as [19]:

Figure 1.

Figure 1

CR is produced by the medium through which charged particles propagate. Reproduced with permission 19. Copyright 2017, Nature Publishing Group.

graphic file with name thnov12p7404i001.jpg

Additionally, the photon flux of CR at a given frequency can be calculated using the Frank-Tamm equation:

graphic file with name thnov12p7404i002.jpg

which demonstrates that CR is blue-weighted and decreases with 1/λ2 from the UV to infrared regions 19.

2.2 Sources of CR

2.2.1 Radionuclides

Radionuclides undergo decay through capture of positrons (β+) or electrons (β-), followed by an isomeric transition. CR arises when charged particles travel faster through the surrounding medium than the phase velocity of light 22. Table 1 lists radioisotopes that emit energy over the CR threshold, such that they induce CR emission 23. Positron emitters in clinical use of positron emission tomography (PET) include 18F, 64Cu, 68Ga, 74As, 89Zr, and 124I. Electron emitters in clinical use include 32P, 90Y, 131I, 177Lu, and 198Au, which can also be used for radiotherapy of cancer.

Table 1.

The properties of radionuclides used for CR applications 23, 24

Radionuclide Half-life Decay mode Energy (keV) Mean photo yield per disintegration Clinical application
18F 109.8 min β+ (97%) 633.5 1.32 PET
64Cu 12.7 h β+ (17.8%) 653 0.557 PET
68Ga 67.6 min β+ (88%) 1899 33.9 PET
89Zr 78.4 h β+ (23%) 2400 2.29 PET
124I 4.17 d β+ (11.7%) 1534 8.97 PET
32P 14.26 d β- (100%) 1710 28.1 Radiotherapy
90Y 64 h β- (99.9%) 2280 47.3 Radiotherapy
131I 8.02 d β- (89.9%) 606 0.669 Radiotherapy
γ (81.7%) 364
177Lu 6.73 d β- (78.6%) 498.3 0.141 Radiotherapy
198Au 2.69 d β- (98.9%) 960.7 Not reported Radiotherapy

The radioactivity of each radionuclide strongly influences the intensity of the produced CR. In CR-based imaging, radionuclides with a relatively short half-life, such as 18F and 64Cu, are preferred for building theranostic nanomaterials. In CRIT, radionuclides with a long half-life, such as 90Y, 131I and 177Lu, are preferred because they can generate CR in the long term for prolonged treatment, and they can generate ionizing radiation that provides radiotherapy.

2.2.2 Megavoltage X-ray radiation

The emission of CR needs the irradiation energy of X-rays to meet the in the high kilovoltage or megavoltage range while only 1% of secondary electrons can be delivered 25, 26. Using X-rays to generate CR and in turn induce luminescence allows imaging at sub-millimeter resolution with nanomolar sensitivity, such as during real-time monitoring during radiotherapy in vivo 25, 26. When X-rays pass through tissues, soft collisions during energy deposition lead to de-excitation of primary or secondary electrons, generating Cerenkov emission (Figure 2A) 7. Megavoltage X-ray radiation is an efficient CR source because the X-ray beams contain far more Cerenkov photons per electron than what traditional radionuclides generate (Figure 2B) 7. An experimental scanning imaging system to detect CR-excited luminescence is shown in Figure 2C. The system includes an accelerator beam and an intensified charge-coupled device. The CR shows minimal fluence loss as it propagates from deep within tissue to the detector (Figure 2D) 27.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) X-rays induce CR through soft collisions of electrons. (B) Numbers of Cerenkov photons per electron generated from radionuclides or a linear accelerator. Reproduced with permission 7. Copyright 2021, Springer-Verlag Wien. (C) Experimental setup for scanning imaging based on Cerenkov-excited luminescence. (D) Fluence of X-ray induced CR from different depths. Reproduced with permission 27. Copyright 2018, Nature Publishing Group.

3. Construction of CR-activated probes

CR can be combined in space and time with activatable probes in two ways. One way is the unbound CR emitter with probes. Megavoltage X-ray radiation or clinical radiopharmaceuticals such as 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) can be used, which requires co-localizing the CR and probes in time and space in vivo. The other way is to use probes already labeled with radionuclides, mainly through (1) extrinsic chelation or (2) intrinsic radiolabelling (Figure 3) 28. The most appropriate radiolabeling chelator depends on the coordination chemistry of the radiometal ion and the surface chemistry of the probe 29. Commonly used chelators include diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA), desferrioxamine (Df), 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA), and 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA). The chelation should be carefully designed in order to avoid altering the probe's pharmacokinetics. This approach carries risk of radionuclide detachment, leading to nonspecific biodistribution that leads to “noise” in the images. Intrinsic radiolabeling means incorporating radionuclides directly into nanoprobes, through such methods as “hot-plus-cold precursors”, cation exchange, and specific trapping 29. For example, radioactive and non-radioactive precursor components can be mixed during NPs synthesis, or the radiochemical can be generated after nanoformulations through surface elemental exchange or radionuclide deposition. Intrinsic radiolabeling ensures a highly stable label that does not alter the probes' intrinsic behavior.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Interactions between a CR emitter and activatable probe in the case of (A) an unbound Cerenkov emitter, (B) chelator-bound CR emitter, or (C) intrinsic radiolabelling. Reproduced with permission 28. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society.

4. Probes for imaging based on CRET

A series of optical probes have been developed to minimize signal attenuation as it passes through tissue, yet tissue autofluorescence still generates sufficient background to severely degrade image quality 30. CR can act as an in situ light source to activate fluorescent probes with large Stokes shifts. In this way, CR overcomes the limited penetration depth of external light, and it avoids tissue autofluorescence. At the same time, the excited fluorescent probe shifts blue-weighted CR to the NIR region or the red visible region, resulting in deeper tissue penetration. Below, we summarize different types of CR-excited fluorescent probes for optical imaging of tumors (Table 2).

Table 2.

Summary of CR-activated optical probes for imaging applications

Activatable probe CR emitter Combination way CRET emission Imaging subject Ref.
Qtracker705 64Cu and 18F Unbound 705nm Subcutaneous pseudotumors 33
three CdSe/ZnS QDs 131I Unbound 665nm, 705nm, 800nm Subcutaneous pseudotumors 34
cRGD-QD605 89Zr-labeled deferoxamine-trastuzumab Unbound 605nm HER2/neu-expressing xenografts 35
CdSeTe/CdSe/CdZnS 89Zr Extrinsic chelation 710nm sentinel lymph nodes and prostate cancer 36
CdSe/ZnS 64Cu Intrinsic radiolabelling 526nm, 580nm, 636nm U87MG tumor 37
CuInS/ZnS 64Cu Intrinsic radiolabelling 680nm U87MG tumor 38
PdSe QDs Megavoltage X-ray radiation Unbound 1030nm Subcutaneous pseudotumors 39
Ba0.55Y0.3F2:Eu3+ 18F-FDG Unbound 597nm, 615nm, 692nn Subcutaneous pseudotumors 43
Y2O2S:Eu3+ 68Ga Unbound 660nm Subcutaneous pseudotumors 44
Gd2O3:Eu3+ 18F-FDG Unbound 620nm, 700nm 4T1 tumor 45
Eu2O3 18F-FDG Unbound 620nm, 700nm Subcutaneous 4T1 tumor and orthotropic HCC tumor 46-49
Eu2O3 89Zr Intrinsic radiolabelling 620nm, 700nm Lymph node and CT26-tumor 50
Tb/Eu complexes 18F, 89Zr Extrinsic chelation 490, 545nm/ 620nm Phantoms 51
Tb(DO2Apic)-DUPA[Eu(DO2Aphen)-DUPA] 18F-FDG Unbound 490, 545nm/ 620nm PC3-PIP tumor (intratumoral treatment, IT) 52
Gold nanoclusters 18F-FDG Unbound 680-700 nm subcutaneous breast carcinomas 54
Gold nanoclusters 64Cu Intrinsic radiolabelling 667nm U87MG tumor 55
ZnGa2O4:Cr3+ 18F-FDG Unbound 695nm 4T1 tumor 61
Fluorescein sodium 18F-FDG, 11C-CHO Unbound 520-530nm subcutaneous 4T1 tumor and orthotropic HCC tumor 64
Fluorescein, rhodamine 6G, rhodamine 101, gresyl violet, cyanine 5, and indocyanine green 90YCl3 Unbound 710nm EMT6-tumor (IT) 65
Phthalocyanine-pyranine conjugates 18F-FDG Unbound 700nm Subcutaneous pseudotumors 67
Naphthofluorescein derivatives 18F Intrinsic radiolabelling pH-sensitive Normal mice 68
aluminum phthalocyanine, platinum II G4 (PtG4) Megavoltage X-ray radiation Unbound 780nm Various tumor 69-72
[Ir(pq)2(bpy)]Cl liposome 18F-FDG Unbound 570nm 4T1 tumor (IT) 74
Pluronic five different dyes-doped F127 silica nanoparticles 32P-ATP Unbound 840nm Phantoms 75

4.1 Quantum dots

Quantum dots (QDs) are nanoscale crystalline clusters (1-10 nm) with high quantum yields, large spectral shifts, and tunable emission colors. They have attracted substantial attention for in vivo fluorescence imaging 31, 32. They absorb broadly throughout the UV-visible range, overlapping with blue-weighted CR. 64Cu and 18F have been used to stimulate Qtracker705 QDs, and high CRET from the enhanced photons in the >590 nm filter was achieved during imaging of phantoms and tissues in vivo 33. Na131I has been used as an unbound CR emitter to activate three CdSe/ZnS QDs with emission peaks of 665, 705, and 800 nm, thereby achieving multiplexed optical imaging 34. In an in vivo study, 89Zr-labeled deferoxamine-trastuzumab actively targeted BT-474 tumors, and intravenously injected cRGD-QD605 accumulated in the tumor region, allowing tumors to be imaged through secondary Cerenkov-induced fluorescence 35. Nevertheless, that work found that the radionuclides did not completely co-localize with the QDs. To improve co-localization, CdSeTe, CdSe, and CdZnS were modified with 89Zr-labeled chelator, and the resulting self-illuminating systems enabled good mapping of sentinel lymph nodes and prostate cancer 36.

To avoid radionuclide detachment, we developed two chelator-free methods to generate 64Cu-labeled QDs 37, 38. One is to introduce 64Cu into QDs by cation exchange 37, and the other is to use 64CuCl2 as a precursor when synthesizing CuInS/ZnS (Figure 4) 38. These two methods lead to high radiostability. The two types of 64Cu-labeled QDs exhibited higher tumor uptake and signal-to-background ratio in CRET imaging in vivo. CR was induced by X-rays to excite PdSe QDs, which emitted in the short-wave infrared region and CRET allowed sensitive depth imaging 39.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A) Schematic of chelator-free synthesis of radiolabeled QDs and application to PET and CRET imaging. (B) Photon flux of different samples obtained with different filters. (C) CRET images of U87MG tumor-bearing mice after 6 h of different treatments. (D,E) Total photon fluxes and red filter ratios in the tumor region. Reproduced with permission 38. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society.

4.2 Lanthanide-based downconversion probes

Lanthanide-based downconversion probes possess good characteristics for optical imaging, such as narrow emission bandwidths, large Stokes shifts, and good photostability 40, 41. They are usually synthesized by doping Tb3+, Eu3+, and Dy3+ to achieve the traditional Stokes luminescence, and they are activated by UV light to generate visible-NIR emission 42. Therefore, lanthanide-based downconversion probes may be good CRET mediators to harness CR energy. Below we summarize the two groups of probes, lanthanide nanoparticles (NPs) and lanthanide complexes.

Lanthanide NPs with hard-core structures are usually synthesized by high-temperature chemical methods. Eu3+-doped Ba0.55Y0.3F2 nanophosphors with emission peaks at 597, 615, 692 nm have been prepared by a solvent-thermal method. Through CRET, excitation by 18F-FDG enhanced nanophosphor radiance at 700 nm for phantom and animal imaging 43. Eu3+-doped Y2O3 NPs have also used as CR mediators for CRET imaging 44; CR, rather than γ rays from 68Ga, was confirmed to enhance luminescence 44. CR from 18F-FDG as well as β and γ radiation efficiently activated Eu3+-doped Gd2O3 NPs, enhancing optical imaging and intraoperatively guiding tumor surgery 45. To improve the efficiency of photon leap in lanthanide NPs, Eu2O3 NPs, which have multiple absorption peaks in the UV range, have been proposed to show more efficient photon leap in lanthanide NPs after activation by ionizing radiation including CR, β, and γ scintillation. This reflects the fact that β interactions significantly contribute to activation of Eu2O3 46-49. Indeed, this approach allowed radiopharmaceutical-excited fluorescence imaging of phantoms as well as Bcap-37, U87MG, and 4T1-luc2 tumor models in vivo with high signal-to-background ratio. Also, Ultra-small 89Zr-labelled Eu2O3 NPs have been developed for enhanced Cerenkov imaging, allowing clear imaging of lymph nodes and tumors (Figure 5) 50.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(A, B) TEM image, excitation and emission spectra of ultrasmall Eu2O3 NPs. (C, D) CRET images of CT26 tumor-bearing mice and ex vivo organ imaging after 48h's injection of 89Zr- Eu2O3. Red arrow, tumor area. Reproduced with permission 50. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.

Other lanthanide complexes have been designed to be excited in situ by radionuclides. 18F- or 89Zr-excited terbium(III) complexes of a macrocyclic polyaminocarboxylate ligand achieved a detection limit of 2.5 nmol in CRET luminescence 51. Peptide-functionalized Tb(III) and Eu(III) complexes have been constructed for radiopharmaceutical-activated imaging in vivo. Combining these two probes with 18F-FDG led to emission at 570 and 620 nm, allowing multiplexed optical imaging of tumors 52.

4.3 Gold nanoclusters

Gold nanoclusters (AuNCs) have been extensively developed as fluorescent probes for biomedical applications owing to their advantages of high compatibility, strong fluorescence, superior photostability, and excellent water solubility 53. AuNCs are usually biomineralized with naturally functional macromolecules, which provide good colloidal stability and facilitate surface functionalization. AuNCs can fluoresce across a broad region extending from visible to near-infrared regions with a large Stokes shift. 64Cu-doped AuNCs with a diameter of 2.54 nm have been synthesized using an approach directed by human serum albumin, leading to AuNCs with an absorption peak at 280 nm and an emission peak at 667 nm (Figure 6A, B) 54. During imaging of phantoms and a U87MG tumor model, 64Cu-doped AuNCs showed 4.3-fold greater optical intensity than free 64CuCl2 with an optical filter of 695-770 nm but lower intensity below 510 nm, demonstrating CRET from 64Cu to AuNCs (Figure 6C, D, E).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(A) TEM image of Cu-doped AuNCs (1%Cu). (B) The absorption and emission spectrum of Cu-doped AuNCs (1% Cu). (C) Intensity changes of 64CuCl2 and 64Cu-doped AuNCs at different optical filter sets. (D, E) Representative CRET images and photon flux of 64Cu-doped AuNCs on the U87MG tumor model. Reproduced with permission 54. Copyright 2014, Elsevier.

To verify the mechanism of efficient radioisotope energy transfer by AuNCs, they were excited using 18F-FDG, 90Y, or 99mTc (γ-emitter). Activation of 99mTc did not induce optical signal, while activation of 18F-FDG and 90Y enhanced optical emission 55. The fact that the signal enhancement was not proportional to CR implies that AuNCs were excited by CR and direct Coulombic interaction 55.

4.4 PLNPs

PLNPs maintain their luminescence after excitation has stopped, so they have been exploited for autofluorescence-free optical imaging with different excitation sources 56-58. Cr3+-doped zinc gallates (ZGCs) are NIR-emitting PLNPs commonly used for tumor diagnosis, with three main excitation bands with peaks at 260, 465, and 570 nm 59, 60. For the first time, we report that both CR and γ radiation from 18F-FDG can efficiently activate ZGCs to emit in the NIR region and persistently release photons for long-term imaging (Figure 7A) 61. In fact, 18F-FDG excited ZGCs in 4T1 tumors in mice, maintaining luminescence for longer than 3 h (Figure 7B). Multiple injections of 18F-FDG also allowed for long-term real-time observation of tumor status, which may facilitate image-guided surgery in the future.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(A) An illustration of in vivo 18F-FDG activated persistent luminescence imaging of ZGCs. (B) Representative luminescence images of 4T1 tumor-bearing mice after administration of only 200 μCi 18F-FDG or 200 μg ZGCs injection before 24 h and following with 200 µCi 18F-FDG. Reproduced with permission 61. Copyright 2020, Wiley-VCH.

4.5 Organic dye or associated NPs

Inorganic fluorescent probes have excellent optical properties and can take full advantage of CR to undergo highly efficient CRET with large Stokes shifts. However, their potential toxicity and non-biodegradability have prevented their extensive development for clinical use. Organic compounds, in contrast, show good biodegradability and low toxicity 62. For example, fluorescein sodium is clinically used to image retinal blood vessels; it absorbs strongly at 465-490 nm and emits at 520-530 nm 63, 64. Despite its short Stokes shift, fluorescein sodium can be activated by 18F-FDG or 11C-CHO to show efficient CRET, as demonstrated in a subcutaneous 4T1 tumor model and orthotopic hepatocellular carcinoma tumor model (Figure 8A, B,C) 64. In that study, tumors were precisely and completely resected through intraoperative CRET and confocal laser endomicroscopy imaging 64.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

(A) CR and CRET imaging of subcutaneous 4T1 tumor model after injection of 300µCi 18F-FDG (CRET group was treated with different doses of fluorescein). (B) The signal intensities and TNR of CLI and CRET. (C) Intraoperative CRI and CRET imaging of orthotropic HCC tumor model, and the process of image-guided surgery. Reproduced with permission 64. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH. (D, E) pO2 images and the corresponding pO2 changes during each day of radiation (6MV X-ray beam with 5 Gy/fraction), PtG4 was iv injected 24h before the first treatment. Reproduced with permission 73. Copyright 2019, Nature Publishing Group.

Various fluorophores have been used to convert CR to NIR emission. Excitation of a mixture of fluorophores (fluorescein, rhodamine 6G, rhodamine 101, gresyl violet, cyanine 5, and indocyanine green) with 90YCl3 led to a CRET process, followed by several rounds of Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), culminating in emission at 710 nm 65, 66. All these fluorophores overlapped well in spectra, emitting twice as many photons as the radionuclide on its own. Featuring larger Stokes shifts, water-soluble phthalocyanine-pyranine conjugates have been developed with absorption at 250-450 nm and emission at 700 nm. They can be activated by 18F-FDG, leading to strong CRET using a filter of 710 nm as well as a photodynamic effect 67. Interestingly, 18F-labeled naphthofluorescein derivatives have been developed that show selective bandwidth quenching under alkaline conditions but full-spectrum CR under acidic conditions 68.

Comparison of different CR-excited fluorophores induced by X-rays 69-72 suggests that aluminum phthalocyanine may be better for molecular luminescence 69, while platinum II G4 (PtG4), with absorption peaks at 435 and 624 nm and an emission peak at 780 nm, may be better for in vivo sensing 70. PtG4 and X-ray induced CR have been used to detect spatial distribution of oxygen in tumors based on phosphorescence lifetimes 27, 73. This approach revealed much higher partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) in MDA-MB-231 tumors than in FaDu tumors in animal models, suggesting that MDA-MB-231 tumors are more susceptible to radiotherapy (Figure 8D, E).

Organic dye-based NPs can enhance the accumulation of contrast agents in tumors while preserving the optical property of those agents. [Ir(pq)2(bpy)]Cl has been encapsulated into liposomes to formulate Ir@liposome, then irradiated with 18F-FDG, leading to imaging of deep tissue with a high signal-to-noise ratio 74. Pluronic F127 silica NPs doped with five dyes have been constructed to absorb strongly in the visible range, leading to the efficient shift of CR towards NIR emission with a quantum yield of 0.12 75. The highly efficient energy transfer allowed the NPs to be detected from muscle as thick as 1.0 cm.

5. Probes for CR-induced therapy

CRIT refers to therapeutic effects that occur when CR-activated probes directly or indirectly produce reactive molecules that kill tumor cells. The efficiency of CRIT depends on delivery of adequate CR to target tissue, and proper stimulation of the probe. Therefore, the CR emitter and activatable probe must be selected carefully. Of course, effective tumor suppression also requires co-localization of emitter and probe. In addition, toxic effects that arise when the two inevitably co-localize in normal tissues must also be considered.

Below we provide an overview of probe-based CRIT, including CR-induced PDT, CR-induced photoimmunotherapy, CR-triggered drug release, and combination therapy (Table 3).

Table 3.

Summary of CR-activated probes for therapeutic applications

Activatable probe CR emitter Combination way CRIT Treated subject Ref.
TiO2-Tf-Tc 18F-FDG Unbound PDT HT1080 tumor 79
TiO2-Tf 89Zr Intrinsic radiolabelling PDT Multiple myeloma 80
Titanocene-loaded nanoparticles 18F-FDG Unbound PDT Metastatic breast cancer and disseminated multiple myeloma 81
TiO2 68Ga-BSA Unbound PDT 4T1 tumor (IT) 82
Chlorin e6 loaded hollow mesoporous silica NPs 89Zr Intrinsic radiolabelling PDT 4T1 tumor (IT) 83
Porphyrin surface-modified magnetic NPs 89Zr Intrinsic radiolabelling PDT 4T1 tumor 84
Df-PPN 89Zr-labeled Df-PPN Unbound PDT 4T1 tumor 85
IRDye700DX 18F-FDG Unbound Photoimmunotherapy A431-luc tumor 88
Folate-modified DOX/nanomicelles Megavoltage X-ray radiation Unbound Chemotherapy Hela tumor 92
ZGCs-ZnPcC4 131I Extrinsic chelation PDT-radiotherapy 4T1 tumor (IT) 95
sPS NPs 131I Extrinsic chelation PDT-radiotherapy 4T1 tumor-bearing mice and VX2 liver tumor-bearing rabbit 96
EM@ALA 131I Extrinsic chelation PDT-radiotherapy 4T1 tumor-bearing mice 97
Titanium-Oxo nanoclusters 18F-FDG Unbound Photo/chemodynamic therapy HepG2 subcutaneous tumor 98
Single-layer 2D nanosheets 32P Intrinsic radiolabelling Radioisotope-immunotherapy 4T1 tumor (IT) 100

5.1. CR-induced PDT

PDT has been widely used to treat many solid tumors because of its non-invasiveness and dual selectivity 76. In PDT, external light activates photosensitizers to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), which damage cancer cells. A major drawback is that PDT requires direct irradiation of tissue with visible or even UV light in order to stimulate photosensitizers. This limits penetration depth, making the approach ineffective against large or deep-seated tumors 6, 77. Blue-weighted CR can overcome this problem by acting as an in situ light source to activate photosensitizers continuously 21.

For example, TiO2 NPs act as photocatalysts that can be regenerated to efficiently absorb UV light at 275-390 nm and to produce cytotoxic superoxide radicals and hydroxyl 78. A TiO2-based CRIT-nanoplatform has been achieved for deep PDT, in which 18F-FDG excites TiO2 to continuously generate OH- by electron-hole pair generation (Figure 9A) 79. Of course, it is worth noting that β and γ scintillation produced from radionuclides also play a role in TiO2's activation 49. Intratumoral administration of TiO2-PEG and 64Cu led to remarkable tumor regression within 3 days and complete inhibition within 30 days. In another approach, apo-transferrin, a ligand for overexpressed Tf receptors, and titanocene, a photogenerator of peroxyl radicals, were integrated into TiO2 (TiO2-Tf-Tc) to enhance CRIT with an intravenous platform (Figure 9B,C,E). This system accumulated in tumors to a greater extent than TiO2-PEG within 24 h, based on ex vivo fluorescence imaging (Figure 9D). Intravenous injection of TiO2-Tf-Tc followed by 18F-FDG at 24 h later significantly inhibited tumor growth (Figure 9E,F). This work paves the way to treating deep-seated tumors using CR-induced PDT.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

(A, B) An illumination of CR-induced PDT during the CR-excited TiO2 NPs and Tc. (C) TEM image of TiO2-Tf-Tc. (D) In vivo biodistribution of TiO2-PEG and TiO2-AlexaTf at 24h postinjection in HT1080 tumor-bearing mice. (E) Cell-viability assays on HT1080 cells with various treatments. (F) Tumor volumes of HT1080 tumor-bearing mice with various treatments. Reproduced with permission 79. Copyright 2015, Nature Publishing Group.

To compensate for low uptake of 18F-FDG in bone, 89Zr-labeled TiO2-Tf has been developed to target bone marrow with high selectivity, leading to accumulation of 70% of injected radioactivity there. This accumulation allowed continuous ROS production that completely eliminated tumors from a multiple myeloma model and that doubled survival time 80. Tf-mediated transport of titanocene into various types of tumor has been improved by using high-affinity VLA-4-bonded LLP2A conjugated phospholipid micelles or human serum albumin NPs 81. Activation of the titanocene in situ by intravenously injected 18F-FDG inhibited breast cancer metastasis and growth of disseminated multiple myeloma. 68Ga-bovine serum albumin has been used instead of 18F-FDG to improve PDT efficiency with CR-excited TiO2, leading to strong tumor inhibition in vitro and in vivo 82.

CR-induced PDT has been achieved using the photosensitizer dyes, such as chlorin e6 and tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin (TCPP) 83-85. Hollow mesoporous silica NPs were loaded with 89Zr-labeled chlorin e6, and the 89Zr provided CR to activate chlorin e6, which generated tumor-inhibiting ROS 83. Given that intravenously injected theranostic agents do not strongly accumulate in tumors, 89Zr-labeled magnetic NPs with a modified porphyrin surface were constructed to enable accumulation of the NPs in tumors (15% ID/g) after application of a magnetic field; the accumulation was five times higher than without the magnetic field 84. TCPP-loaded magnetic NPs significantly inhibited tumor growth through CR-induced PDT during two weeks. While promising, this strategy led to substantial NPs accumulation also in healthy organs, suggesting the potential for adverse effects. To enhance targeting in CRIT, a “missile-detonation” strategy has been developed: high-dose p-SCN-Bn-deferoxamine-porphyrin-PEG nanocomplex (Df-PPN) was administered as a CR energy receiver, and it passively targeted tumors; then, at the optimal time, low-dose 89Zr-labeled Df-PPN was injected as a CR emitter (Figure 10A) 85. This strategy effectively mitigated toxic side effects of CRIT due to the relatively low accumulation of PPN in normal tissues. The nanocomplex persisted in the tumor in the long term, based on CR-excited fluorescence imaging (Figure 10B,C,D), and it drove continuous ROS production that significantly suppressed tumor growth (Figure 10E).

Figure 10.

Figure 10

(A) Schematic of the “missile-detonation” strategy. (B,C) Representative CR-excited optical images and the corresponding photon fluxes in a 4T1 tumor model on different days after treatment. (D) Biodistribution of 89Zr-Df-PPNs at 14 days after injection, based on measurement of radioactivity in each organ. (E) Relative volume of 4T1 tumors in mice after various treatments. Reproduced with permission 85. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH.

5.2 CR-induced photoimmunotherapy

NIR photoimmunotherapy is a newly targeted cancer treatment that uses antibody-photoabsorbers (IRDye700DX) to actively bind to cancer cells and then induce the selective immunogenic cell death under NIR light irradiation, resulting in the activation of anti-cancer immune system locally in the tumor microenvironment 86, 87. However, NIR laser light cannot penetrate deep in tissue, but the CR emitter 18F-FDG can be delivered deep into tissue to deliver radiation at the absorbance peak of IRDye700DX at 350 nm, allowing photoimmunotherapy of deep-seated tumors 88. The CR-induced photoimmunotherapy in that study inhibited tumor growth to some degree, but the effect was not consistent during the observation period. This may be because the lower CR energy stimulated a weak immune response. Megavoltage X-ray radiation may be a better CR source for activation of IRDye700DX.

5.3 CR-triggered drug release

Although chemotherapeutics can be effective against cancer, delivering them to target tissue without causing toxicity in normal tissue is challenging 89. Therefore, drug delivery systems have been developed to release drugs at specific sites in response to certain stimuli, especially light 89, 90. However, the limited penetration of light through tissue means that external light sources cannot efficiently trigger drug release in deep tissue. Using CR as in situ light can overcome this shortcoming. UV-responsive drug delivery systems may be most appropriate for CR-activated drug release. For example, phenacyl bis-azide crosslinkers make dextran-based hydrogels photosensitive, and the co-loaded doxorubicin (DOX), BSA, and IgG are efficiently released after UV light irradiation 91. In another approach, DOX has been caged using a photocleavable o-nitrobenzyl ester derivative and then encapsulated into nanomicelles for CR-triggered drug release and chemotherapy (Figure 11) 92. Irradiation with X-rays induced CR, which converted the hydrophobic DOC into hydrophilic DOX, which was rapidly released and killed cancer cells. This strategy may pave the way to a new chemoradiotherapy with minimal systemic side effects.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

The CR-responsive folate-modified DOX/nanomicelles for folate cellular targeting and nuclear localization toxicity. Reproduced with permission 92. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.

5.4 Combination therapy

The low efficiency of CR limits its therapeutic efficacy 93, which combination therapy may improve 94. We have developed a ZGC nanoplatform conjugated to 131I-labeled ZnPc(COOH)4 (131I-ZGCs-ZnPcC4) that can support both radiotherapy as well as continuous, radiation-induced PDT through energy transfer from the ionizing radiation to ZGCs and then to ZnPc(COOH)4 95. In another approach, we engineered pyropheophorbide-a containing PEG and a diisopropylamino group with an 131I-labeled tyrosine, which self-assembled into pH-sensitive NPs 96. These NPs exhibited minimal phototoxicity in normal tissue because of the quenched photodynamic effect, and under acidic conditions, they disassembled to promote the generation of ROS to achieve PDT and radiotherapy against deep-seated tumors (Figure 12A). Their strong accumulation in tumors makes the NPs effective against 4T1 tumors in mice and VX2 liver tumors in rabbits (Figure 12B). Thus, this strategy shows promise for deep tumor therapy. Combination therapy also has been developed in which the precursor of protoporphyrin IX called 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and 131I are co-loaded into biomimetic exosomes. In the tumor microenvironment, where mitochondria are abundant, the ALA is converted to protoporphyrin IX, minimizing CRIT side effects on normal tissues 97.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

(A) Schematic of pH-activatable CRET-PDT. (B) Representative imaging of VX2 liver tumor-bearing rabbits using PET/CT before and at seven days after the indicated treatments. Reproduced with permission 96. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH. (C) Schematic of 32P-triggered NO release for enhanced radioisotope-immunotherapy. (D) Concentration of NO released from ZnNO(32P) nanosheets at various time points. (E) Growth curves of CT26 tumors in mice after various treatments. Reproduced with permission 99. Copyright 2019, Elsevier.

Functionalized inorganic materials can also achieve multiple therapeutic effects. Titanium-oxo nanoclusters have been reported for CR-induced photo/chemodynamic therapy of tumors 98. CR can drive efficient production of hydroxyl radical (·OH) from titanium-oxo nanoclusters due to the enhanced separation of hole (h+)-electron (e-) pairs. The reaction of h+ and H2O provides type I PDT, while the transferred e- augmented Ti3+ provides chemodynamic therapy. Besides, 32P-labeled single-layer 2D nanosheets have been constructed by mixing Zn2+ ions and sodium nitroprusside [Na2Fe(CN)5NO]. CR from 32P can persistently stimulate nanosheets to release NO, which can modulate the tumor microenvironment to induce anti-tumor immunotherapy and improve the efficacy of radionuclide therapy (Figure 12C,D) 99-100. This nanosystem has been extended to include immune-checkpoint blockade therapy against anti-programmed cell death protein 1 in order to achieve sustainably strong immune responses that effectively suppress tumor growth (Figure 12E).

6. Conclusion and perspectives

CR-activated probes take advantage of the ability of CR to pass through tissue without attenuation, enabling detection and treatment of deep-seated tumors. This review has focused on probes that can be activated by CR and that provide theranostics via CRET or production of reactive species/drug release. While these activatable probes can also be excited by ionizing radiation from radiotracers, especially lanthanide-based downconversion probes, the present review demonstrates the promise of approaches based on activation by CR. Further development of CRET will depend on the design of biocompatible optical probes with large Stokes shifts in the “deep NIR” to NIR-II regions. Future work should aim to overcome several limitations of CRIT, such as inefficient delivery of CR to therapeutic drugs in tumors, short duration of CR excitation, and damage to normal tissue during CRIT. In any case, suitable CR emitters and CR-responsive photosensitizers or drugs must always be chosen carefully in order to maximize tumor targeting and tumor cytotoxicity. Radionuclides with long half-lives are particularly promising as CR emitters, because they continuously generate CR to activate CR-responsive photosensitizers or drugs while also providing radiotherapy. Although CR remains in early stages of preclinical development, we believe that its use as an in situ light source will broaden the possibilities for imaging-based theranostics of cancer.

Acknowledgments

Su X. Acknowledges the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (82071965) and Huadong Medicine Joint Funds of the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LHDMZ22H300010). Sun X. acknowledges the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFA0203600), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971738, 81571743), the Project Program of State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University (SKLNMZZRC05).

References

  • 1.Yun SH, Kwok SJJ. Light in diagnosis, therapy and surgery. Nat Biomed Eng. 2017;1:0008. doi: 10.1038/s41551-016-0008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Menon JU, Jadeja P, Tambe P, Vu K, Yuan B, Nguyen KT. Nanomaterials for photo-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Theranostics. 2013;3:152–166. doi: 10.7150/thno.5327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu N, O'Connor P, Gujrati V, Gorpas D, Glasl S, Blutke A, Facile Synthesis of a Croconaine-Based Nanoformulation for Optoacoustic Imaging and Photothermal Therapy. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021. 2002115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.Liu N, Gujrati V, Malekzadeh-Najafabadi J, Werner JPF, Klemm U, Tang L. et al. Croconaine-based nanoparticles enable efficient optoacoustic imaging of murine brain tumors. Photoacoustics. 2021;22:100263. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shi D, Liu W, Wang G, Guo Y, Li J. Small molecule fulorescence-based probes for agingdiagnosis. Acta Materia Medica. 2022;1(1):4–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fan W, Huang P, Chen X. Overcoming the Achilles' heel of photodynamic therapy. Che Soc Rev. 2016;45:6488–6519. doi: 10.1039/c6cs00616g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pogue BW, Cao X, Swartz HM, Vinogradov SA. Review of Tissue Oxygenation Sensing During Radiotherapy Based Upon Cherenkov-Excited Luminescence Imaging. Appl Magn Reson. 2021;52:1521–1536. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Robertson R, Germanos MS, Li C, Mitchell GS, Cherry SR, Silva MD. Optical imaging of Cerenkov light generation from positron-emitting radiotracers. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:N355–65. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/16/N01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jelley JV. Cerenkov radiation and its applications. Br J Appl Phys. 1955;6:227. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tanha K, Pashazadeh AM, Pogue BW. Review of biomedical Cerenkov luminescence imaging applications. Biomed Opt Express. 2015;6:3053–3065. doi: 10.1364/BOE.6.003053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Xu Y, Liu H, Cheng Z. Harnessing the power of radionuclides for optical imaging: Cerenkov luminescence imaging. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:2009–2018. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.092965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Thorek DL, Riedl CC, Grimm J. Clinical Cerenkov luminescence imaging of 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:95–98. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.127266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lewis DY, Mair R, Wright A, Allinson K, Lyons SK, Booth T. et al. [(18)F]fluoroethyltyrosine-induced Cerenkov Luminescence Improves Image-Guided Surgical Resection of Glioma. Theranostics. 2018;8:3991–4002. doi: 10.7150/thno.23709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Grootendorst MR, Cariati M, Pinder SE, Kothari A, Douek M, Kovacs T. et al. Intraoperative Assessment of Tumor Resection Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery Using 18F-FDG Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging: A First-in-Human Feasibility Study. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:891–898. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.181032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mc Larney B, Skubal M, Grimm J. A Review of Recent and Emerging Approaches for the Clinical Application of Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging. Front Phys. 2021;9:684196. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2021.684196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hachadorian RL, Bruza P, Jermyn M, Gladstone DJ, Pogue BW, Jarvis LA. Imaging radiation dose in breast radiotherapy by X-ray CT calibration of Cherenkov light. Nat Comm. 2020;11:2298. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16031-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pratt EC, Skubal M, Mc Larney B, Causa-Andrieu P, Das S, Sawan P, Prospective testing of clinical Cerenkov luminescence imaging against standard-of-care nuclear imaging for tumour location. Nat Biomed Eng. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-022-00876-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Niu G, Chen X. When radionuclides meet nanoparticles. Nat Nanotechnol. 2018;13:359–360. doi: 10.1038/s41565-018-0103-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shaffer TM, Pratt EC, Grimm J. Utilizing the power of Cerenkov light with nanotechnology. Nat Nanotechnol. 2017;12:106–117. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2016.301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ferreira CA, Ni D, Rosenkrans ZT, Cai W. Radionuclide-Activated Nanomaterials and Their Biomedical Applications. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2019;58:13232. doi: 10.1002/anie.201900594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li B, Lin L. Internal light source for deep photodynamic therapy. Light Sci Appl. 2022;11:85. doi: 10.1038/s41377-022-00780-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Luig H, Keller C, Wolf W, Shani J, Miska H, Zyball A, Radionuclides. Radionuclides, Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 2000.
  • 23.Ma X, Wang J, Cheng Z. Cerenkov radiation: a multi-functional approach for biological sciences. Front Phys. 2014;2:4. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gill RK, Mitchell GS, Cherry SR. Computed Cerenkov luminescence yields for radionuclides used in biology and medicine. Phys. Med. Biol. 2015;60:4263–4280. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/11/4263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Grimm J. High-resolution Cherenkov tomography in vivo. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018;2:205–206. doi: 10.1038/s41551-018-0225-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pogue BW, Zhang R, Cao X, Jia JM, Petusseau A, Bruza P. et al. Review of in vivo optical molecular imaging and sensing from x-ray excitation. J Biomed Opt. 2021;26:010902. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.26.1.010902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pogue BW, Feng J, LaRochelle EP, Bruza P, Lin H, Zhang R. et al. Maps of in vivo oxygen pressure with submillimetre resolution and nanomolar sensitivity enabled by Cherenkov-excited luminescence scanned imaging. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018;2:254–264. doi: 10.1038/s41551-018-0220-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sun X, Cai W, Chen X. Positron emission tomography imaging using radiolabeled inorganic nanomaterials. Acc Chem Res. 2015;48:286–294. doi: 10.1021/ar500362y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chakravarty R, Goel S, Dash A, Cai W. Radiolabeled inorganic nanoparticles for positron emission tomography imaging of cancer: an overview. Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2017;61:181–204. doi: 10.23736/S1824-4785.17.02969-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhao J, Zhong D, Zhou S. NIR-I-to-NIR-II fluorescent nanomaterials for biomedical imaging and cancer therapy. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6:349–365. doi: 10.1039/c7tb02573d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Michalet X, Pinaud FF, Bentolila LA, Tsay JM, Doose S, Li JJ. et al. Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and diagnostics. Science. 2005;307:538–544. doi: 10.1126/science.1104274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wegner KD, Hildebrandt N. Quantum dots: bright and versatile in vitro and in vivo fluorescence imaging biosensors. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44:4792–4834. doi: 10.1039/c4cs00532e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dothager RS, Goiffon RJ, Jackson E, Harpstrite S, Piwnica-Worms D. Cerenkov radiation energy transfer (CRET) imaging: a novel method for optical imaging of PET isotopes in biological systems. PloS One. 2010;5:e13300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu H, Zhang X, Xing B, Han P, Gambhir SS, Cheng Z. Radiation-luminescence-excited quantum dots for in vivo multiplexed optical imaging. Small. 2010;6:1087–1091. doi: 10.1002/smll.200902408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Thorek DL, Ogirala A, Beattie BJ, Grimm J. Quantitative imaging of disease signatures through radioactive decay signal conversion. Nat Med. 2013;19:1345–1350. doi: 10.1038/nm.3323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhao Y, Shaffer TM, Das S, Perez-Medina C, Mulder WJ, Grimm J. Near-Infrared Quantum Dot and 89Zr Dual-Labeled Nanoparticles for in vivo Cerenkov Imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2017;28:600–608. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sun X, Huang X, Guo J, Zhu W, Ding Y, Niu G. et al. Self-illuminating 64Cu-doped CdSe/ZnS nanocrystals for in vivo tumor imaging. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:1706–1709. doi: 10.1021/ja410438n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Guo W, Sun X, Jacobson O, Yan X, Min K, Srivatsan A. et al. Intrinsically Radioactive [64Cu]CuInS/ZnS Quantum Dots for PET and Optical Imaging: Improved Radiochemical Stability and Controllable Cerenkov Luminescence. ACS Nano. 2015;9:488–495. doi: 10.1021/nn505660r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cao X, Jiang S, Jia MJ, Gunn JR, Miao T, Davis SC. et al. Cherenkov excited short-wavelength infrared fluorescence imaging in vivo with external beam radiation. J Biomed Opt. 2018;24:1–4. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.24.5.051405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bajgiran KR, Dorman JA, Melvin AT. Dipole-Modulated Downconversion Nanoparticles as Label-Free Biological Sensors. ACS Sens. 2020;5:29–33. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.9b02204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Loo JF-C, Chien Y-H, Yin F, Kong S-K, Ho H-P, Yong K-T. Upconversion and downconversion nanoparticles for biophotonics and nanomedicine. Coord Chem Rev. 2019;400:213042. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Escudero A, Becerro AI, Carrillo-Carrión C, Núñez NO, Zyuzin MV, Laguna M. et al. Rare earth based nanostructured materials: synthesis, functionalization, properties and bioimaging and biosensing applications. Nanophotonics. 2017;6:881–921. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sun C, Pratx G, Carpenter CM, Liu H, Cheng Z, Gambhir SS. et al. Synthesis and radioluminescence of PEGylated Eu(3+) -doped nanophosphors as bioimaging probes. Adv Mater. 2011;23:H195–9. doi: 10.1002/adma.201100919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gao Y, Ma X, Kang F, Yang W, Liu Y, Wang Z. et al. Enhanced Cerenkov luminescence tomography analysis based on Y2O3:Eu3+ rare earth oxide nanoparticles. Biomed Opt Express. 2018;9:6091. doi: 10.1364/BOE.9.006091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Shi X, Cao C, Zhang Z, Tian J, Hu Z. Radiopharmaceutical and Eu(3+) doped gadolinium oxide nanoparticles mediated triple-excited fluorescence imaging and image-guided surgery. J Nanobiotechnology. 2021;19:212. doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-00920-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hu Z, Qu Y, Wang K, Zhang X, Zha J, Song T. et al. In vivo nanoparticle-mediated radiopharmaceutical-excited fluorescence molecular imaging. Nat Comm. 2015;6:7560. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hu Z, Zhao M, Qu Y, Zhang X, Zhang M, Liu M. et al. In vivo 3-Dimensional Radiopharmaceutical-Excited Fluorescence Tomography. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:169–174. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.180596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hu Z, Chi C, Liu M, Guo H, Zhang Z, Zeng C. et al. Nanoparticle-mediated radiopharmaceutical-excited fluorescence molecular imaging allows precise image-guided tumor-removal surgery. Nanomed: Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2017;13:1323–1331. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2017.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pratt EC, Shaffer TM, Zhang Q, Drain CM, Grimm J. Nanoparticles as multimodal photon transducers of ionizing radiation. Nat Nanotechnol. 2018;13:418–1426. doi: 10.1038/s41565-018-0086-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang Q, Pratt EC, Tamura R, Ogirala A, Hsu HT, Farahmand N. et al. Ultrasmall Downconverting Nanoparticle for Enhanced Cerenkov Imaging. Nano Lett. 2021;21:4217–4224. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cosby AG, Ahn SH, Boros E. Cherenkov Radiation-Mediated In situ Excitation of Discrete Luminescent Lanthanide Complexes. Angewandte Chemie. 2018;57:15496–15499. doi: 10.1002/anie.201809783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Martin KE, Cosby AG, Boros E. Multiplex and In vivo Optical Imaging of Discrete Luminescent Lanthanide Complexes Enabled by In situ Cherenkov Radiation Mediated Energy Transfer. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143:9206–9214. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c04264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kaur N, Aditya RN, Singh A, Kuo TR. Biomedical Applications for Gold Nanoclusters: Recent Developments and Future Perspectives. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2018;13:302. doi: 10.1186/s11671-018-2725-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hu H, Huang P, Weiss OJ, Yan X, Yue X, Zhang MG. et al. PET and NIR optical imaging using self-illuminating 64Cu-doped chelator-free gold nanoclusters. Biomaterials. 2014;35:9868–76. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Volotskova O, Sun C, Stafford JH, Koh AL, Ma X, Cheng Z. et al. Efficient Radioisotope Energy Transfer by Gold Nanoclusters for Molecular Imaging. Small. 2015;11:4002–8. doi: 10.1002/smll.201500907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sun SK, Wang HF, Yan XP. Engineering Persistent Luminescence Nanoparticles for Biological Applications: From Biosensing/Bioimaging to Theranostics. Acc Chem Res. 2018;51:1131–43. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sun X, Song L, Liu N, Shi J, Zhang Y. Chromium-Doped Zinc Gallate Near-Infrared Persistent Luminescence Nanoparticles in Autofluorescence-Free Biosensing and Bioimaging: A Review. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2021;4:6497–514. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Liu N, Chen X, Sun X, Sun X, Shi J. Persistent luminescence nanoparticles for cancer theranostics application. J Nanobiotechnology. 2021;19:113. doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-00862-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Li Z, Zhang Y, Wu X, Wu X, Maudgal R, Zhang H. et al. In vivo Repeatedly Charging Near-Infrared-Emitting Mesoporous SiO2/ZnGa2O4:Cr3+ Persistent Luminescence Nanocomposites. Adv Sci. 2015;2:1500001. doi: 10.1002/advs.201500001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Li Z, Zhang Y, Wu X, Huang L, Li D, Fan W. et al. Direct Aqueous-Phase Synthesis of Sub-10 nm "Luminous Pearls" with Enhanced in vivo Renewable Near-Infrared Persistent Luminescence. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:5304–5307. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b00872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Liu N, Shi J, Wang Q, Guo J, Hou Z, Su X. et al. In vivo Repeatedly Activated Persistent Luminescence Nanoparticles by Radiopharmaceuticals for Long-Lasting Tumor Optical Imaging. Small. 2020:e2001494. doi: 10.1002/smll.202001494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Cai Y, Si W, Huang W, Chen P, Shao J, Dong X. Organic Dye Based Nanoparticles for Cancer Phototheranostics. Small. 2018;14:e1704247. doi: 10.1002/smll.201704247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Dip FD, Nahmod M, Anzorena FS, Moreira A, Sarotto L, Ampudia C. et al. Novel technique for identification of ureters using sodium fluorescein. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2730–2733. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3519-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zheng S, Zhang Z, Qu Y, Zhang X, Guo H, Shi X. et al. Radiopharmaceuticals and Fluorescein Sodium Mediated Triple-Modality Molecular Imaging Allows Precise Image-Guided Tumor Surgery. Adv Sci. 2019:1900159. doi: 10.1002/advs.201900159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bernhard Y, Collin B, Decreau RA. Redshifted Cherenkov Radiation for in vivo Imaging: Coupling Cherenkov Radiation Energy Transfer to multiple Forster Resonance Energy Transfers. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45063. doi: 10.1038/srep45063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bernhard Y, Collin B, Decreau RA. Inter/intramolecular Cherenkov radiation energy transfer (CRET) from a fluorophore with a built-in radionuclide. Chem Comm. 2014;50:6711–6713. doi: 10.1039/c4cc01690d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lioret V, Bellaye PS, Arnould C, Collin B, Decreau RA. Dual Cherenkov Radiation-induced Near-Infrared Luminescence Imaging and Photodynamic Therapy towards Tumor Resection. J Med Chem. 2020;63:9446–9456. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Czupryna J, Kachur AV, Blankemeyer E, Popov AV, Arroyo AD, Karp JS. et al. Cerenkov-specific contrast agents for detection of pH in vivo. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:483–488. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.146605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Petusseau AF, Bruza P, Pogue BW. Survey of X-ray induced Cherenkov excited fluorophores with potential for human use. J Radiat Res. 2021;62:833–840. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrab055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Shell J, LaRochelle EP, Bruza P, Gunn J, Jarvis L, Gladstone D. et al. Comparison of phosphorescent agents for noninvasive sensing of tumor oxygenation via Cherenkov-excited luminescence imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2019;24:1–8. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.24.3.036001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Axelsson J, Davis SC, Gladstone DJ, Pogue BW. Cerenkov emission induced by external beam radiation stimulates molecular fluorescence. Med Phys. 2011;38:4127–32. doi: 10.1118/1.3592646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lin H, Zhang R, Gunn JR, Esipova TV, Vinogradov S, Gladstone DJ. et al. Comparison of Cherenkov excited fluorescence and phosphorescence molecular sensing from tissue with external beam irradiation. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:3955–68. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/10/3955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Cao X, Rao Allu S, Jiang S, Jia M, Gunn JR, Yao C. et al. Tissue pO2 distributions in xenograft tumors dynamically imaged by Cherenkov-excited phosphorescence during fractionated radiation therapy. Nat Comm. 2020;11:573. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14415-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hou Y, Wang C, Chen M, Wang M, Deng G, Yang H. et al. Iridium complex nanoparticle mediated radiopharmaceutical-excited phosphorescence imaging. Chem Comm. 2019;55:14442–14445. doi: 10.1039/c9cc07399j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Genovese D, Petrizza L, Prodi L, Rampazzo E, De Sanctis F, Spinelli AE. et al. Tandem Dye-Doped Nanoparticles for NIR Imaging via Cerenkov Resonance Energy Transfer. Front Chem. 2020;8:71. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Dolmans DEJGJ, Fukumura D, Jain RK. Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:380. doi: 10.1038/nrc1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lovell JF, Liu TWB, Chen J, Zheng G. Activatable Photosensitizers for Imaging and Therapy. Chem Rev. 2010;110:2839–2857. doi: 10.1021/cr900236h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zhou Z, Song J, Nie L, Chen X. Reactive oxygen species generating systems meeting challenges of photodynamic cancer therapy. Chemical Society reviews. 2016;45:6597–626. doi: 10.1039/c6cs00271d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kotagiri N, Sudlow GP, Akers WJ, Achilefu S. Breaking the depth dependency of phototherapy with Cerenkov radiation and low-radiance-responsive nanophotosensitizers. Nat Nanotechnol. 2015;10:370–9. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Tang R, Zheleznyak A, Mixdorf M, Ghai A, Prior J, Black KCL. et al. Osteotropic Radiolabeled Nanophotosensitizer for Imaging and Treating Multiple Myeloma. ACS Nano. 2020;14:4255–4264. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b09618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kotagiri N, Cooper ML, Rettig M, Egbulefu C, Prior J, Cui G. et al. Radionuclides transform chemotherapeutics into phototherapeutics for precise treatment of disseminated cancer. Nat Comm. 2018;9:275. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02758-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Duan D, Liu H, Xu Y, Han Y, Xu M, Zhang Z. et al. Activating TiO2 Nanoparticles: Gallium-68 Serves as a High-Yield Photon Emitter for Cerenkov-Induced Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:5278–86. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b17902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kamkaew A, Cheng L, Goel S, Valdovinos HF, Barnhart TE, Liu Z. et al. Cerenkov Radiation Induced Photodynamic Therapy Using Chlorin e6-Loaded Hollow Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:26630–26637. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b10255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ni D, Ferreira CA, Barnhart TE, Quach V, Yu B, Jiang D. et al. Magnetic Targeting of Nanotheranostics Enhances Cerenkov Radiation-Induced Photodynamic Therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140:14971–14979. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b09374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Yu B, Ni D, Rosenkrans ZT, Barnhart TE, Wei H, Ferreira CA. et al. A "Missile-Detonation" Strategy to Precisely Supply and Efficiently Amplify Cerenkov Radiation Energy for Cancer Theranostics. Adv Mater. 2019:e1904894. doi: 10.1002/adma.201904894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kobayashi H, Furusawa A, Rosenberg A, Choyke PL. Near-infrared photoimmunotherapy of cancer: a new approach that kills cancer cells and enhances anti-cancer host immunity. Int Immunol. 2020;33:7–15. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxaa037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kobayashi H, Choyke PL. Near-Infrared Photoimmunotherapy of Cancer. Acc Chem Res. 2019;52:2332–9. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Nakamura Y, Nagaya T, Sato K, Okuyama S, Ogata F, Wong K. et al. Cerenkov Radiation-Induced Photoimmunotherapy with 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1395–400. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.188789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Rahim MA, Jan N, Khan S, Shah H, Madni A, Khan A. et al. Recent Advancements in Stimuli Responsive Drug Delivery Platforms for Active and Passive Cancer Targeting. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:670. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Mi P. Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery, tumor imaging, therapy and theranostics. Theranostics. 2020;10:4557–4588. doi: 10.7150/thno.38069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Breve TG, Filius M, Weerdenburg S, van der Griend SJ, Groeneveld TP, Denkova AG. et al. Light-Sensitive Phenacyl Crosslinked Dextran Hydrogels for Controlled Delivery. Chemistry. 2022;28:e202103523. doi: 10.1002/chem.202103523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Yao C, Li J, Cao X, Gunn JR, Wu M, Jiang S. et al. X-ray-Induced Cherenkov Optical Triggering of Caged Doxorubicin Released to the Nucleus for Chemoradiation Activation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:44383–44392. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c05189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Daouk J, Dhaini B, Petit J, Frochot C, Barberi-Heyob M, Schohn H. Can Cerenkov Light Really Induce an Effective Photodynamic Therapy? Radiation. 2020;1:5–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Bayat Mokhtari R, Homayouni TS, Baluch N, Morgatskaya E, Kumar S, Das B. et al. Combination therapy in combating cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:38022–38043. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wang Q, Liu N, Hou Z, Shi J, Su X, Sun X. Radioiodinated Persistent Luminescence Nanoplatform for Radiation-Induced Photodynamic Therapy and Radiotherapy. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020:e2000802. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202000802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Guo J, Feng K, Wu W, Ruan Y, Liu H, Han X. et al. Smart 131I labeled self-illuminating photosensitizers for deep tumor imaging guided therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2021;60:21884. doi: 10.1002/anie.202107231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Qian R, Wang K, Guo Y, Li H, Zhu Z, Huang X. et al. Minimizing adverse effects of Cerenkov radiation induced photodynamic therapy with transformable photosensitizer-loaded nanovesicles. J. Nanobiotechnology. 2022;20:203. doi: 10.1186/s12951-022-01401-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Li J, Dai S, Qin R, Shi C, Ming J, Zeng X. et al. Ligand Engineering of Titanium-Oxo Nanoclusters for Cerenkov Radiation-Reinforced Photo/Chemodynamic Tumor Therapy. ACS applied materials & interfaces. 2021;13:54727–54738. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c16213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Han X, Nie G. Say No to Tumors: NO Matters. Matter. 2019;1:794–796. [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Tian L, Wang Y, Sun L, Xu J, Chao Y, Yang K. et al. Cerenkov Luminescence-Induced NO Release from 32P-Labeled ZnFe(CN)5NO Nanosheets to Enhance Radioisotope-Immunotherapy. Matter. 2019;1:1061–1076. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Theranostics are provided here courtesy of Ivyspring International Publisher

RESOURCES