Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Nov 23;12:20181. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24558-y

A novel gallium oxide nanoparticles-based sensor for the simultaneous electrochemical detection of Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg2+ ions in real water samples

Gehad Abd El-Fatah 1, Hend S Magar 2, Rabeay Y A Hassan 3, Rehab Mahmoud 1, Ahmed A Farghali 4, Mohamed E M Hassouna 1,
PMCID: PMC9691749  PMID: 36424461

Abstract

Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) using gallium oxide nanoparticles/carbon paste electrode (Ga2O3/CPE) was utilized for the simultaneous detection of Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg2+ ions. Ga2O3NPs were chemically synthesized and fully characterized by Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Through the assay optimization, electrochemical screening of different nanomaterials was carried out using the cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in order to determine the best electrode modifier that will be implemented for the present assay. Consequently, various parameters such as electrode matrix composition, electrolyte, deposition potential, and deposition time were optimized and discussed. Accordingly, the newly developed sensing platform showed a wide dynamic linear range of 0.3–80 µM with detection limits (LODs) of 84, 88 and 130 nM for Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg2+ ions, respectively. While the corresponding limit of quantification (LOQ) values were 280, 320 and 450 nM. Sensors selectivity was investigated towards different non-targeting metal ions, whereas no obvious cross-reactivity was obtained. Eventually, applications on real samples were performed, while excellent recoveries for the multiple metal ions were successfully achieved.

Subject terms: Environmental sciences, Chemistry

Introduction

In response to the severe warning from global warming and climate changes, environmental pollution caused by heavy metals has attracted large attention especially in recent decades. Among the list of heavy metals, Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg2+ ions have a very hazardous impact on the environment, especially human health1. Those toxic ions have accumulative action on human organs; once they are absorbed, they are accumulated in body organs causing serious effects2. Exposure to Pb2+ ions causes many serious effects as it prevents hemoglobin formation, indigestion, anemia, high blood pressure, damages the immune system and kidneys; also causes harmful effects on children’s bones3,4. Cadmium (II) is considered as one of the most toxic heavy metals. Absorption of Cd2+ ions in the human body causes swelling of kidneys, liver and lungs57. Moreover, cadmium ions have severe effects on cardiovascular, immune and reproductive systems8. Mercury(II) is one of the oldest known contaminants; exposure to such toxic heavy metal, even at low concentrations, causes dangerous problems to the central nervous system, cause skin rashes and damage vital human organs9.

According to the updated standard regulations and guidelines of the World Health Organization and US Environmental Protection Agency guidelines, maximum allowable concentration of such heavy metal ions in drinking water should not exceed 1.0 µg/L10.

Thus, various analytical techniques have been developed for the determination traces amounts of heavy metal ions including the flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (FAAS)11, electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETAAS)12, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)13, atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS)14,15 and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)16. Although these advanced techniques provide low detection limits and have the ability to measure many of metal ions simultaneously, they are very expensive, need sophisticated instruments, high sample consumption, need treatments for sample analysis, difficult procedures and long time for analysis. Hence, various electrochemical methods were developed to overcome the limitations of previous techniques. Electrochemical methods are preferred for providing accurate measurements, short time for the species detection, easy procedure, and cheap instrumentation, portable and user-friendly1722. DPV technique is one of the electrochemical techniques which used for quantification of species with high accuracy, sensitivity and low detection limit. Electrode surface modification with nanomaterials (metal or metal oxides nanostructures) displayed a great impact on the selectivity and sensitivity of the electrochemical methods23.

Metal oxides (MOs) are prepared with different morphologies and crystalline structures, thus involving a large variety of potential applications24,25. In particular, MOs exist in the form of p and n-type semiconductors, which contain many oxygen vacancies26. These oxygen vacancies co-existed in MOs during the electrochemical applications are acting as charge carriers27. Predominant use for MOs, especially transition metals in electrochemical detection, is attributed to their electrocatalytic properties.

Gallium oxide (Ga2O3) is emerging as an essential material for optical devices, gas sensors and power electronic devices, due to the optoelectronic transparency, the large band gap, and the high breakdown voltage, combined with high electrical conductivity28,29. Ga2O3 nanoparticles (NPs) have a band gap of 4.8 ~ 5 eV, also have chemical and thermal stability that makes them a good participant in sensing applications. Besides, the highly electrochemical performance of Ga2O3 NPs is attributed to its high electrical conductivity, high ratio and large surface area that results from the morphology of nanostructures30. Thus, gallium oxide was tested and investigated as a material for chemical sensors and catalyzers, for phosphors and electroluminescent devices, for high-voltage and power electronics, and of course for transparent conductive coatings31. Regarding the biocompatibility and cytotoxicity, gallium oxide and gallium-doped material showed excellent material-bone integration with no sign of local toxicity or implant rejection. Systemic biocompatibility investigation did not indicate any sign of toxicity, with no presence of fibrosis or cellular infiltrate in the histological microstructure of the liver and kidneys after 56 days of observation32.

In the present study, Ga2O3NPs were chemically synthesized and subsequently fully characterized by FTIR, XRD, TEM and SEM/EDX. The electrochemical characterizations were performed using cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) whereas modified carbon electrodes were exploited as the working electrodes. Thus, this is the first time to use gallium oxide as a novel nanomaterial for constructing simple and highly sensitive simultaneous quantification of Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg2+ ions. For Ga2O3-based sensor parameters optimization; electrode composition, types and concentration of the supporting electrolyte, deposition potential and deposition time were studied. The modified sensor was used for determination of Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg2+ ions in real water samples.

Methods

Chemicals and reagents

For Ga2O3 nanostructures preparation, gallium metal was purchased from Fluka, aqueous diethylene glycol (DEG) and ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Besides Ga2O3 NPs, the synthesized MOs were also used in this current study including the tungsten dioxide (WO2), zirconium dioxide (ZrO2), nickel dioxide (NiO2) and cerium dioxide (CeO2). Different supporting electrolytes were prepared in double distilled water using acetic acid (HAc, 99.79%), nitric acid (HNO3, 68%), phosphoric acid (H3PO4, 85%), sodium chloride (NaCl) and potassium chloride (KCl). Acetate buffer solution of 0.1 M for pH 5.0 was prepared by mixing stock solution of 0.1 M sodium acetate (NaAc) and (HAc). Potassium ferricyanide and potassium ferrocyanide were purchased from Piochem for laboratory chemicals and ALPHA CHEMIKA, respectively. Cadmium nitrate (Cd(NO3)2), lead nitrate (Pb(NO3)2) and mercury chloride (HgCl2) were purchased from (Merck, Germany), (WINLAB, LABORATORY CHEMICALS REAGENTS FINE CHEMICALS) and ACROS ORGANICS, respectively. For carbon paste electrode preparation, graphite powder was provided by ACROS ORGANICS and paraffin oil was purchased from Fluka. In addition, interferences study was carried out using copper (II) nitrate (Cu(NO3)2.3H2O), zinc chloride (ZnCl2) and potassium chromate (K2CrO4) were purchased from (WINLAB, LABORATORY CHEMICALS REAGENTS FINE CHEMICALS), calcium carbonate (CaCO3), magnesium nitrate hexahydrate (Mg(NO3)2.6H2O), ferric nitrate (Fe(NO3)3.9H2O and chromium (III) nitrate (Cr(NO3)3.9H2O), were purchased from Piochem for laboratory chemicals, Sisco Research Laboratories, ALPHA CHEMIKA and Riedel–deHaen, respectively.

Synthesis of gallium oxide nanomaterials

According to the previously published methods33,34, X gallium oxide nanoparticles were chemically synthesized as follows: di-ethylene glycol (DEG) was added drop by drop after the dissolution of gallium metal with strong stirring. The obtained solution was reacted with NH4OH solution with continuous stirring forming a precipitate of gallium hydroxide, which was treated hydrothermally in an autoclave at 180 °C for 24 h. The resulting product was washed with double distilled water, dried in an oven, followed by thermal treatment to 650 °C and finally kept at 650 °C for 5 h.

Instruments for material characterizations

Electrochemical characterizations were conducted using a Potentiostat/Galvanostat (AUTOLAB-PGSTAT 302 N, Metrohm). The electrochemical cell was connected to three-electrodes whereas the modified carbon paste electrode was the working electrode, platinum wire (Pt) and Ag/AgCl were the counter and the reference electrode. The FTIR spectroscopic spectrum of Ga2O3NPs was recorded using Bruker Vertex 70. The XRD analysis was performed in the 2-theta range of 10 to 80° (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), and verified via (Cu, wavelength 1.5406) AXS D8 Advance diffractometer). Size, morphology, and elemental composition of the metal nanostructures were determined and characterized using TEM (JEOL JEM-1230) and SEM/EDX (Gemini Zeiss-Sigma 500 VP).

Fabrication of the modified sensor (Ga2O3/CPE)

Ga2O3-based electrodes were fabricated by homogenous mixing of Ga2O3NPs, graphite powder and 250 µL paraffin oil in a mortar for 30 min35. The resulting paste was carefully packed and compressed into a Teflon tube as a holder with a diameter of 5 mm, with a Cu wire as an electrical connector. Before using the electrode, its surface was polished on a smooth paper, finally rinsed with double distilled water.

Electrochemical measurements

Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were conducted in 0.1 M KCl electrolyte containing 5 mM of the K3[Fe(CN)6]3/4 at potential range of − 0.4 to 0.6 V with scan rate of 50 mV/s. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed at frequency range of 10 kHz to 0.1 Hz under 10 mV AC-potential amplitude at open circuit potential in KCl (0.1 M) containing 5 mM of the K3[Fe(CN)6]3/4. EIS analysis was carried out using the modeled equivalent circuit. Differential Pulse Voltammetry (DPV) measurements were performed in 0.1 M HNO3 as the optimum electrolyte with potential range of − 1.1 to 0.4 V. All obtained electrochemical responses were recorded at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C).

Real sample analysis

Treated waste water sample has been kindly provided by Abu Shahba Sanitation (Beni-Suef Water & Sanitation Company, Public management of central laboratory WWTP). The sample has been checked by ICP (Perkin Elmer aveo220 max) before and after spiking with standard concentrations of the targeting metal ions. Tap water samples were collected from the local chemistry labs, and their heavy metal contents were also DPV analyzed after spiking with the metal ions. All recovery rates were calculated and presented accordingly.

Statistics and data analysis

All data are presented as mean ± SD after considering at least three individual electrochemical testes. Statistical significance was estimated by statistical hypothesis testing, the significance of the values was assumed as p < 0.05. Each limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) values were calculated from calibration curves. The reproducibility and repeatability of the modified sensor were represented using the relative standard deviation (RSD). All of the represented plots were sketched by Origin Lab software.

Results and discussion

Characterization of the Ga2O3 NPs

For the functional analysis, the FTIR spectrum of Ga2O3NPs was analyzed in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 as shown in Fig. 1. A broad absorption band was observed in the range of 3000–3700 cm−1. The band appearing at 3433 cm−1 was corresponding to H–O–H stretching. The weak peak at 1614 cm−1 represents the bending vibrations of –OH groups and adsorbed water molecules. Strong peaks at 688 cm−1 and 459 cm−1 as result of Ga–O bending vibrations31. Thus, from FTIR analysis, Ga2O3NPs are formed only in monoclinic structure.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

FTIR spectrum of the prepared Ga2O3NPs.

Furthermore, XRD analysis for the nanoparticles was carried out for crystalline, purity and atomic structure investigation, as shown in Fig. 2. Sharp and strong peaks were observed illustrating that gallium oxide diffraction powders are prepared with high crystalline structure, thus a characteristic diffraction peak with highest intensity was positioned at 2θ = 31.560 with d spacing = 0.283 nm. This clear diffraction peak corresponds to the following miller indices of plane (002) which indicate that pure gallium oxide crystals are obtained in the hexagonal phase. No impurity peaks were observed in the limit up to 80 degree, indicating the high purity of the prepared nanomaterials. The average crystallite size was estimated for the index of (002) using the formula of Debye–Scherrer36. The average size of Ga2O3 NPs was calculated to be 30.2 nm. From the XRD pattern, gallium-oxide NPs were formed in a single-phase structure. The morphological characterization of Ga2O3NPs using TEM analysis was utilized for particle sizes and shapes determination, where homogeneous hexagonal shapes and uniform nano-sizes ranged from19–34 nm as illustrated in Fig. 3 (a) and (b) which was demonstrated by the XRD as well.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

XRD of Ga2O3NPs.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

TEM images (a) and (b) of the synthesized Ga2O3NPs.

Morphology of Ga2O3 NPs was studied by the SEM analysis. Figure 4(a,b,c) displays the morphology of the synthesized Ga2O3NPs, where the particles are found as layers and spindle with average particle diameter from 22 to 30 nm as shown in Fig. 4(c). EDX and mapping analysis were used for the elemental and composition analysis as shown in Fig. 5(a,b). The percentage of elemental composition (Ga and O) was obtained by EDX and mapping analysis proved that gallium and oxygen are present in the percentages of 65% and 35%, respectively. Worth mentioning here that the pore structure of the Ga2O3 that was shown by the SEM images (Fig. 4(a)) could be exploited for the selective uptake of heavy metal ions, hence electrode surface modification with such nanomaterial will support the construction of a high performance electrochemical assay.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

SEM images (a), (b) and (c) of Ga2O3NPs.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

EDX (a) and elemental mapping (b) of Ga2O3NPs.

Electrochemical investigation of different nanomaterials

Here, modification of the electrode surface with different metal oxide nanostructures was suggested for providing a highly efficient electrochemical sensing platform. In this regard, several types of MOs including Ga2O3, WO2, ZrO2, NiO2 and CeO2 were screened. Accordingly, for each individual modified electrode, characteristics of both CV and EIS data were recorded in Ferricyanide (FCN) as the standard redox probe. As a result, electrochemical signals of the modified electrode with the Ga2O3 NPs demonstrated the highest redox peak heights than all other modified electrodes, as shown in Fig. 6(A). For the electrochemical impedance spectra, Nyquist plots shown in Fig. 6(B) confirmed the impact of the Ga2Onanomaterials on the enhancements of the electrochemical signal of their modified electrodes whereas the charge transfer resistance (Rct) was significantly dropped by the Ga2O3-modified electrodes. Table S1 (supplementary materials) showed the calculated and all obtained electrochemical information obtained by the CV and EIS analysis for all modified and unmodified electrodes. Thus, Ga2O3 NPs were selected and assigned for the voltammetric determination of multiple heavy metal ions.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(A) CV and (B) EIS measurements for the unmodified and modified carbon paste electrodes with 30 mg of each metal oxide.

Voltammetric sensing of multiple heavy metal ions (Pb2+, Cd2+and Hg2+)

From the DPV measurements (Fig. 7A), anodic peaks of Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg2+ ions appeared at designated potentials of − 0.42 V, − 0.63 V and + 0.24 V, respectively. In respect to the anodic peak heights, two distinguished responses towards the heavy metals were received from the unmodified or the Ga2O3 modified electrodes whereas an increase in several orders of magnitude was obtained by the modified surfaces, as depicted in Fig. 7B. This synergistic enhancement is attributed to the high electro-catalytic activity of Ga2O3NPs as well as the expanded electrode surface due to the addition of nanomaterial into its matrix.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(A) DPV responses of Ga2O3-based electrode in the plain supporting electrolyte (blue line) which is the 0.1 M of the HNO3, and after injecting a mixture of the targeting metal ions (Pb+2, Cd+2 and Hg+2) with the concentration of 0.001 M of (red line). (B) DPV signals of Ga2O3/CPE compared with the bare electrode in 0.1 M HNO3 containing 0.001 M of each of Pb+2, Cd+2 and Hg+2 ions.

As a proposed sensing mechanism, at the beginning of the electrochemical reaction, heavy metal ions in the cationic forms are adsorbed to the electrode surface via the electrostatic interaction with the negatively charged surface of the Ga2O3NPs as follows:

M2++Ga2O3M2+-Ga2O3adsorption

Then, the adsorbed cationic metal ions will be electrochemically reduced to M0 under the applied voltammetric potential, which is then will be oxidized to generate the anodic peak currents.

DPV assay optimization

For obtaining high sensitivity, several parameters and experimental conditions are optimized and in the next subsections, their details will be discussed.

Effect of electrode composition

Usually nanomaterial content or concentration in any sensing and bio-sensing platform have a certain limit and capacity which should not be exceeded in order to satisfy the desired needs for high sensitivity and selectivity. Thus, impact of Ga2O3 NPs concentration into the electrode matric was studied at different concentrations ranging from 10 to 90 mg, while the graphite-powered content was constant in all modified electrodes. The performance of each of the modified electrodes was tested individually towards the voltammetric oxidation of the selected three metal ions, as shown in Fig. 8A. As a result, the influence of nanomaterial concentration was clear and the increase of the oxidation peak current was obtained for all metal ions. However, increasing the Ga2O3NPs concentration over 30 mg disturbed the DPV signals; hence, the oxidation current was significantly dropped. Since the highest signal was obtained when the Ga2O3NPs concentration was 30 mg, it  was applied for the next optimizing parameters.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

(A) DPV response of Ga2O3-based electrode with different concentrations in the electrode matrix. DPV measurements were conducted in 0.1 M HNO3 containing 0.001 M of each of Pb+2, Cd+2 and Hg+2 ions. (B) DPV measurements of Ga2O3-based electrodes in various supporting electrolytes (0.1 M), each electrolyte containing 0.001 M of each of Pb+2, Cd+2 and Hg+2 ions. (C) DPV response of Ga2O3-based electrode in different concentrations of HNO3 as the optimum supporting electrolyte, each concentration containing 0.001 M of each of Pb+2, Cd+2 and Hg+2 ions.

The influence of supporting electrolytes

For further optimization, DPV performance of the Ga2O3-based electrode towards the oxidation of the targeting metal ions was tested in different supporting electrolyte solutions including H3PO4, HNO3, CH3COOH, sodium chloride and acetate buffer. As shown in Fig. 8B, sharp and defined three anodic peaks were clearly generated when nitric and phosphoric acids were implemented as supported electrolytes. However, the highest electrochemical signals were supported by the nitric acids. The other tested electrolytes did not support the efficient oxidation of the targeting metal ions. Thus, nitric acid was selected. Consequently, different concentrations of nitric acid were examined, as shown in Fig. 8C. The performance of the Ga2O3-based electrode was strongly affected by the change of nitric acid concentration, whereas 0.1 M exhibited the highest DVP signals for all metal ions.

Effect of deposition potential and accumulation time

Deposition potential is one of the crucial factors that influence the rate of the deposition of the targeting analyte(s) into the interface or the electrode surface. Therefore, it is worthwhile to test the DPV signals at different deposition potentials. In that regard, a potential range of − 1.3 to − 0.9 V was applied and the oxidation of the targeting metal ions was tested. Resulted data (Fig. 1S, Supplementary materials) showed that the increase in the peak currents of all metal ions (Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg2+) was dependent on the increase of the accumulation potential until reaching a potential of − 1.1 V, then a drop in the oxidation current was obtained.

Consequently, the deposition time, which is needed for enriching the metal ions into the modified electrode surface, was studied from 30 to 120 s at − 1.1 V as the selected applied potential. As a result, the increase in the peak currents was correlated with the increase in the time of deposition until reaching 60 s (Fig. 2S, Supplementary materials). Therefore, accumulation potential and time of − 1.1 V, and 60 s were chosen as the optimum parameters.

Standard calibration curves

After optimizing all of the experimental conditions, Ga2O3-based electrodes were exploited for the simultaneous quantitative analysis of Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg2+ ions. For determining the capacity of linearity and sensitivity towards each metal ion, a continuous standard addition of mixture of Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg2+ ions was conducted. As a result, very sharp and defined oxidation peaks with a gradual increase that was strongly dependent on the addition of the metal ions were obtained as depicted in Fig. 9A. The determined calibration curves for each metal ion covered the entire range of concentrations from 0.3 to 80 µM, 5 to 80 µM and from 0.6 to 80 µM for the Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg2+, respectively (Fig. 9B). From the statistical analysis, correlation coefficients (R2) of 0.989, 0.99 and 0.972 were obtained with limit of detections of 84 nM, 88 nM and 130 nM, and limit of quantifications of 280 nM, 320 nM and 450 nM, respectively.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

(A) DPV peaks of Ga2O3-based electrode of Pb+2, Cd+2 and Hg+2 ions over concentration range of 0.3–80 µM, at a fixed deposition potential of − 1.1 V, equilibrium time 15 s and step potential of 0.01 V. (B) Linear regression lines between concentration and corresponding oxidation current values of Pb+2, Cd+2 and Hg+2 ions.

Referring to the previously reported data regarding the electrochemical detection of the selected metal ions, Table 13741 summarized the most updated limit of detections and the nano-materials used for the electrode modifications. As shown in that table, the highest sensitivity is exhibited by the newly developed Ga2O3-sensor.

Table 1.

A list of previously published electrochemical methods for the simultaneous detection of heavy metal ions (Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg2+). The present method is included for comparison.

Electrode Technique LOD, nM Refs
Pb2+ Cd2+ Hg2+
EDTA_PANI/SWCNTs/SS DPV 1650.0 680.0 37
BiNP/Nafion-modified PGE ASV 149.95 65.03 38
CeHCF/GCE LSV 9.65 88.95 14.95 39
PGMGPE CV 800.0 6600.0 40
polyPCA/GE SWASV 65.64 136.99 41
Ga2O3/CPE DPV 84.0 88.0 130.0 Current method

Interferences study

To investigate the selectivity of Ga2O3 sensor towards Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg2+ ions, the Ga2O3-based electrode was tested in the presence of other metal ions including the Mg2+, Fe3+, Cr6+, Cr3+, Zn2+, Ca2+ and Cu2+. This cross-reactivity test was carried out individually at a single concentration (50 µM) of the ions. As a result, Table 2 demonstrated that the Mg2+ and Ca2+ have slight negative interference effect by ≈ 5%, while the Cr6+ and Zn2+ have affected the DPV signals of the targeting ions with about 30% and Cu2+ ions have a positive interference by ≈ 20%.

Table 2.

Effect of the interfering ions on the differential pulse output signals of target ions.

Interferring ions Concentration (µM) Peak currents (µA) Signal change %
Pb2+ Cd2+ Hg2+ Pb2+ Cd2+ Hg2+
Blank 50 282.22 100.86 70.9
Mg2+ 50 268.86 68.9 51.36 − 4.73 − 31.7 − 27.6
110 264.22 81.91 57.27 − 6.37 − 18.8 − 19.2
Fe2+ 50 236.31 92.04 106.77 − 16.3 − 8.74 50.6
110 217.91 88.91 96.45 − 22.8 − 11.8 36.03
Cr6+ 50 189.31 86.81 98.5 − 32.9 − 13.9 38.9
110 181.77 80.81 101.9 − 35.6 − 19.9 43.7
Cr3+ 50 286.63 115.09 81.04 1.56 15.01 14.3
110 285.22 124.81 95.18 1.06 24.4 35.2
Zn2+ 50 185.77 47.95 120.36 − 34.2 − 52.5 69.8
110 150.31 72.22 284.0 − 46.7 − 28.4 100.0
Ca2+ 50 246.81 82.13 52.71 − 12.5 − 18.6 − 25.7
110 319.04 115.9 71.86 − 13.0 14.9 1.35
Cu2+ 50 340.9 82.40 44.22 20.8 − 18.3 − 37.6
110 136.4 0 63.09 − 51.6 − 100.0 − 11.0

Reproducibility and repeatability of Ga2O3 sensor

Four freshly prepared Ga2O3-based electrodes were prepared and the DPV response of each of them was individually tested towards a mixture of the target metal ions at 50 µM. Very close responses were received from all prepared electrodes with slight variations (1.99, 4.33 and 5.73% for Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg2+, respectively). Thus, a high reproducibility was attained.

On the other hand, repeatability of Ga2O3-based electrodes was evaluated whereas DPV measurements were conducted separately five times using only one modified electrode. As a result, relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 4.77, 4.57 and 6.8, were obtained for Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg2+ ions, respectively. Accordingly, a high repeatability was attained as well. Thus, the main criteria (i.e. the selectivity, sensitivity, reproducibility and repeatability) for designing a high effective chemical sensor for multiple and simultaneous analyte (s) detection was successfully achieved.

Real sample analysis

Waste water sample containing traces of five metal ions (Cd2+, Cu2+, Pb2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+) as illustrated in Table 3 was considered for the direct DVP analysis using the newly modified chemical sensor. Since these concentrations are lower than the detection limits of the fabricated Ga2O3 sensor, it was an obligation to apply the spiking of concentrations from (10 to 70 µM) of Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions to the real treated sample to investigate the applicability of the electrode for the analysis of environmental samples. Table 3 showed that the recoveries of Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions using Ga2O3-based electrode were in the range of 95–110%. The regression lines obtained were displayed in Fig. 10A,B showed the excellent linear relationships between the concentration of each of the target ions and the corresponding anodic peak current values.

Table 3.

Analysis of real treated wastewater samples, previously monitored by ICP, before and after spiking with Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions using Ga2O3-based sensor.

Technique Real treated wastewater sample Added (µM) Found (µM) Recovery %
ICP Cd2+ 0.48
Cu2+ 0.44
Pb2+ 0.02
Ni2+ 0.30
Zn2+ 0.62
DPV (Ga2O3/CPE) Cd2+ 10 9.65 96
Cd2+ 40 39.77 99
Cd2+ 70 66.78 95
Pb2+ 30 32.65 109
Pb2+ 70 76.94 110

Figure 10.

Figure 10

(A) and (B) represent the regression lines of Cd+2 and Pb+2, determined with spiked treated wastewater samples using the Ga2O3-based electrode.

Additionally, spiked (synthetically contaminated) tap water samples were analyzed, while the calculated recovery was ranging from 91 to 108%, as shown in Table 4. Hence, Ga2O3 sensor proved to be valid for determination of Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg2+ ions in environmental real water samples.

Table 4.

Analysis of spiked tap water samples for determination of Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg2+ ions using the Ga2O3/CPE.

Samples Heavy metals Added (µM) Found (µM) Recovery %
Tap water 1 Cd2+ 80 81.44 101
Pb2+ 80 72.42 90
Tap water 2 Cd2+ 80 86.56 108
Hg2+ 80 73.84 92
Tap water 3 Pb2+ 70 69.98 99
Tap water 4 Pb2+ 70 66.07 94
Hg2+ 70 70.12 100

Conclusion

Ga2O3 nanoparticles have been chemically synthesized, physically and chemically characterized. Electrochemical characteristics of those nanoparticles showed remarkable conductivity and electro-catalytic activities, thus carbon paste electrodes were modified and suggested for the simultaneous voltammetric determination of multiple heavy metal ions (Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg2+). A DPV assay was fully optimized; hence, the selectivity, sensitivity, reproducibility, and repeatability were eventually accomplished. Accordingly, direct analysis of environmental samples was conducted without any prior sample preparation, and validated with a reference method (ICP), whereas an excellent recovery was obtained for all tested samples.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Beni-Suef Water & Sanitation Company, Public management of central laboratory WWTP) in Beni-Suef Governorate, Egypt for providing real samples of treated waste water monitored by ICP.

Author contributions

M.E.M.H.: conceptualization, writing—review & editing, visualization, project administration; R.M, H.M, R.H:software, validation, formal analysis, resources, data curation, review the manuscript, supervision; A.A.F: data curation, review the manuscript; G.A: methodology, software, formal analysis, investigation, resources, writing—original draft.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-24558-y.

References

  • 1.Niu B, et al. Carbon paste electrode modified with fern leave-like MIL-47(as) for electrochemical simultaneous detection of Pb(II), Cu(II) and Hg(II) J. Electroanal. Chem. 2021;886:115121. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115121. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Xie Y-L, et al. Graphene/CeO2 hybrid materials for the simultaneous electrochemical detection of cadmium(II), lead(II), copper(II), and mercury(II) J. Electroanal. Chem. 2015;757:235–242. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.09.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zirlianngura A, Tiwari D, Ha J-H, Lee S-M. Efficient use of porous hybrid materials in a selective detection of Lead(II) from aqueous solutions: An electrochemical study. Metals. 2017;7:124. doi: 10.3390/met7040124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ding Q, Li C, Wang H, Xu C, Kuang H. Electrochemical detection of heavy metal ions in water. Chem. Commun. 2021;57:7215–7231. doi: 10.1039/D1CC00983D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Magar HS, Magd EEA-E, Hassan RYA, Fahim AM. Rapid impedimetric detection of cadmium ions using Nanocellulose/ligand/nanocomposite (CNT/Co3O4) Microchem. J. 2022;182:107885. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107885. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Alfadaly RA, et al. Microbial sensing and removal of heavy metals: Bioelectrochemical detection and removal of Chromium(VI) and Cadmium(II) Molecules. 2021;26:2549. doi: 10.3390/molecules26092549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aravind A, Sebastian M, Mathew B. Green silver nanoparticles as a multifunctional sensor for toxic Cd(ii) ions. New J. Chem. 2018;42:15022–15031. doi: 10.1039/C8NJ03696A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bhardiya SR, et al. A novel bioconjugated reduced graphene oxide-based nanocomposite for sensitive electrochemical detection of cadmium in water. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021;328:129019. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.129019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.El-Raheem HA, Hassan RYA, Khaled R, Farghali A, El-Sherbiny IM. New sensing platform of poly(ester-urethane) urea doped with gold nanoparticles for rapid detection of mercury ions in fish tissue. RSC Adv. 2021;11:31845–31854. doi: 10.1039/d1ra03693a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hussain S, et al. Health risk assessment of different heavy metals dissolved in drinking water. Int. J. Environ. Research Public Health. 2019;16:1737. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Daşbaşı T, Saçmacı Ş, Ülgen A, Kartal Ş. A solid phase extraction procedure for the determination of Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions in food and water samples by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. Food Chem. 2015;174:591–596. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sardans J, Montes F, Peñuelas J. Determination of As, Cd, Cu, Hg and Pb in biological samples by modern electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta Part B. 2010;65:97–112. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2009.11.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen Y, He M, Chen B, Hu B. Thiol-grafted magnetic polymer for preconcentration of Cd, Hg, Pb from environmental water followed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry detection. Spectrochim. Acta Part B. 2021;177:106071. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2021.106071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li Y, Zhu Z, Zheng H, Jin L, Hu S. Significant signal enhancement of dielectric barrier discharge plasma induced vapor generation by using non-ionic surfactants for determination of mercury and cadmium by atomic fluorescence spectrometry. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2016;31:383–389. doi: 10.1039/C5JA00300H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhou Q, Zhao N, Xie G. Determination of lead in environmental waters with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction prior to atomic fluorescence spectrometry. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011;189:48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhou Q, Lei M, Liu Y, Wu Y, Yuan Y. Simultaneous determination of cadmium, lead and mercury ions at trace level by magnetic solid phase extraction with Fe@Ag@Dimercaptobenzene coupled to high performance liquid chromatography. Talanta. 2017;175:194–199. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.07.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hassan RYA. Advances in electrochemical nano-biosensors for biomedical and environmental applications: From current work to future perspectives. Sensors. 2022;22:7539. doi: 10.3390/s22197539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Magar HS, Brahman PK, Hassan RYA. Disposable impedimetric nano-immunochips for the early and rapid diagnosis of Vitamin-D deficiency. Biosens. Bioelectron. X. 2022;10:100124. doi: 10.1016/j.biosx.2022.100124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Magar HS, Hassan RYA, Mulchandani A. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS): Principles, construction, and biosensing applications. Sensors. 2021;21:6578. doi: 10.3390/s21196578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Magar HS, Abbas MN, Ali MB, Ahmed MA. Picomolar-sensitive impedimetric sensor for salivary calcium analysis at POC based on SAM of Schiff base–modified gold electrode. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2020;24:723–737. doi: 10.1007/s10008-020-04500-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Magar HS, Ghica ME, Abbas MN, Brett CMA. Highly sensitive choline oxidase enzyme inhibition biosensor for lead ions based on multiwalled carbon nanotube modified glassy carbon electrodes. Electroanalysis. 2017;29:1741–1748. doi: 10.1002/elan.201700111. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Magar HS, Ghica ME, Abbas MN, Brett CMA. A novel sensitive amperometric choline biosensor based on multiwalled carbon nanotubes and gold nanoparticles. Talanta. 2017;167:462–469. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.02.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Aravind A, Mathew B. Nano layered ion imprinted polymer based electrochemical sensor and sorbent for Mn (II) ions from real samples. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A. 2020;57:256–265. doi: 10.1080/10601325.2019.1691451. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Elzwawy A, et al. Exploring the structural and electrochemical sensing of wide bandgap calcium phosphate/CuxFe3-xO4 core-shell nanoceramics for H2O2 detection. Mater. Today Commun. 2022;33:104574. doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104574. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Afkhami A, Sayari S, Soltani-Felehgari F, Madrakian T. Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanocomposite modified carbon paste electrode for highly sensitive and selective simultaneous electrochemical determination of trace amounts of mercury (II) and cadmium (II) J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2015;12:257–265. doi: 10.1007/s13738-014-0480-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yousf N, et al. Synthesis, characterization, and electrochemical sensing applications of bimetallic oxide/carbon nanomaterials hybrids. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022;169:047518. doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac6458. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sawan S, Maalouf R, Errachid A, Jaffrezic-Renault N. Metal and metal oxide nanoparticles in the voltammetric detection of heavy metals: A review. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2020;131:116014. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sutter E, Idrobo JC, Sutter P. Synthesis and optoelectronic properties of ultrathin Ga2O3 nanowires. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2020;8:11555–11562. doi: 10.1039/D0TC02040K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Guo D, et al. Review of Ga2O3-based optoelectronic devices. Mater. Today Phys. 2019;11:100157. doi: 10.1016/j.mtphys.2019.100157. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chen M, et al. Polycrystalline Ga2O3 nanostructure-based thin films for fast-response solar-blind photodetectors. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022;5:351–360. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.1c02782. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nikolaev VI, Stepanov SI, Romanov AE, Bougrov VE. In: Single Crystals of Electronic Materials. Roberto Fornari R, editor. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2019. pp. 487–521. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Souza L, Ferreira FV, Lopes JH, Camilli JA, Martin RA. Cancer inhibition and in vivo osteointegration and compatibility of gallium-doped bioactive glasses for osteosarcoma applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022;14:45156–45166. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c12102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rambabu U, Munirathnam NR, Prakash TL, Vengalrao B, Buddhudu S. Synthesis and characterization of morphologically different high purity gallium oxide nanopowders. J. Mater. Sci. 2007;42:9262–9266. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-1869-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.El-Salamony RA, Morsi RE. Stable gallium oxide@ silica/polyvinyl pyrrolidone hybrid nanofluids: Preparation, characterization, and photo-activity toward removal of malachite green dye. J. Mol. Liq. 2018;271:589–598. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.08.139. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mahmoud RH, Samhan FA, Ibrahim MK, Ali GH, Hassan RYA. Formation of electroactive biofilms derived by nanostructured anodes surfaces. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2021;44:759–768. doi: 10.1007/s00449-020-02485-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ingham B, Toney MF. In: Metallic Films for Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Applications. Barmak K, Coffey K, editors. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2014. pp. 3–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Deshmukh MA, Celiesiute R, Ramanaviciene A, Shirsat MD, Ramanavicius A. EDTA_PANI/SWCNTs nanocomposite modified electrode for electrochemical determination of copper (II), lead (II) and mercury (II) ions. Electrochim. Acta. 2018;259:930–938. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.131. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Palisoc S, Gonzales AJ, Pardilla A, Racines L, Natividad M. Electrochemical detection of lead and cadmium in UHT-processed milk using bismuth nanoparticles/Nafion®—modified pencil graphite electrode. Sens. Bio. Sens. Research. 2019;23:100268. doi: 10.1016/j.sbsr.2019.100268. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Devadas B, Sivakumar M, Chen S-M, Rajkumar M, Hu C-C. Simultaneous and selective detection of environment hazardous metals in water samples by using flower and christmas tree like cerium hexacyanoferrate modified electrodes. Electroanalysis. 2015;27:2629–2636. doi: 10.1002/elan.201500208. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Raril C, Manjunatha JG. Fabrication of novel polymer-modified graphene-based electrochemical sensor for the determination of mercury and lead ions in water and biological samples. J. Anal. Sci. Technol. 2020;11:3. doi: 10.1186/s40543-019-0194-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lima TM, et al. A novel electrochemical sensor for simultaneous determination of cadmium and lead using graphite electrodes modified with poly(p-coumaric acid) Microchem. J. 2021;168:106406. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106406. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES