Skip to main content
Microorganisms logoLink to Microorganisms
. 2022 Oct 22;10(11):2100. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10112100

Genomic and Biochemical Characterization of Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 Isolated from Human Intestine

Raquel González-Vázquez 1,*, Eduardo Zúñiga-León 2, Edgar Torres-Maravilla 3, Martha Leyte-Lugo 1, Felipe Mendoza-Pérez 2, Natalia C Hernández-Delgado 4, Ricardo Pérez-Pastén-Borja 4, Alejandro Azaola-Espinosa 2,*, Lino Mayorga-Reyes 2,*
Editors: Todd Riley Callaway, Jeferson M Lourenco
PMCID: PMC9695335  PMID: 36363691

Abstract

Bifidobacteria have been investigated due to their mutualistic microbe–host interaction with humans throughout their life. This work aims to make a biochemical and genomic characterization of Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum JCLA3. By multilocus analysis, the species of B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 was established as pseudocatenulatum. It contains one circular genome of 2,369,863 bp with G + C content of 56.6%, no plasmids, 1937 CDSs, 54 tRNAs, 16 rRNAs, 1 tmRNA, 1 CRISPR region, and 401 operons predicted, including a CRISPR-Cas operon; it encodes an extensive number of enzymes, which allows it to utilize different carbohydrates. The ack gene was found as part of an operon formed by xfp and pta genes. Two genes of ldh were found at different positions. Chromosomally encoded resistance to ampicillin and cephalothin, non-hemolytic activity, and moderate inhibition of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 were demonstrated by B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3; it can survive 100% in simulated saliva, can tolerate primary and secondary glyco- or tauro-conjugated bile salts but not in a mix of bile; the strain did not survive at pH 1.5–5. The cbh gene coding to choloylglycine hydrolase was identified in its genome, which could be related to the ability to deconjugate secondary bile salts. Intact cells showed twice as much antioxidant activity than debris. B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 showed 49% of adhesion to Caco-2 cells. The genome and biochemical analysis help to elucidate further possible biotechnological applications of B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3.

Keywords: Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum, gastrointestinal tract stress, potential probiotic characteristics, genome sequencing

1. Introduction

Bifidobacteria are part of the first bacteria that colonize the gut shortly after birth and establish a mutualistic microbe–host interaction, influencing early and late life [1,2]. Many species of the genus Bifidobacterium are currently being studied for their potential health benefits and their effects on metabolic disorders associated with obesity by modulating gut microbiota composition and promoting changes in lipid metabolism and glucose homeostasis [3], by their ability to modulate the production of gamma amino butyric acid in the human gastrointestinal tract, by acting as a defense against pathogens, by hydrolyzing non-digestible dietary carbohydrates through the expression of enzymes and producing short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), mainly lactate, acetate and, formate, in addition to being able to stimulate the immune response [1,3,4,5,6].

There is an evident lack of knowledge concerning the molecular mechanisms that explain these probiotic traits of Bifidobacterium. The complete genome sequencing of Bifidobacterium may be helpful to better predict more accurate functional properties for health benefits and clarify the mechanisms involved in its interaction with the host, mainly how they tolerate gastrointestinal tract stress [7]. The European Food Safety Authority has developed guidelines for the safety assessment of probiotics, which include a taxonomic identification of the strain by whole-genome sequencing, genomic and phenotypic determination of the antibiotic resistance profile, and safety evaluation [8].

Particularly, B. pseudocatenulatum has shown probiotic properties, such as the possession of antinutrient-degrading enzymes, the ability to bind mutagenic aromatic amines, the capacity to reduce cholesterol levels [9], clinical applications of aging-related diseases and extending life span [10]. Olvera et al. (2013) [11] isolated a strain of Bifidobacterium from a natural newborn, who was breastfeeding; it was identified only at the genera level, and the expression of ack and ldh genes were studied under different substrates. In this work, we determined that the Bifidobacterium isolated by Olvera et al. (2013) [11] belongs to the species pseudocatenulatum. The knowledge of the complete genome of this B. pseudocatenulatum would provide greater insight into the taxonomic affiliation and intra-specific variation of this species and supply information on the genetics that underlay strain-specific capabilities as have been reported in other Bifidobacterium [9]. Thus, this study aimed to create a genomic and biochemical characterization of the previously isolated B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 to further understand the role of this bacterium in the metabolism of carbohydrates and the catalytic tools it uses to adapt to the gastrointestinal tract of mammals, its antibiotic susceptibility, its tolerance to the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), and adhesion properties. It also aims to provide valuable information on its potential functional properties, such as antimicrobial, bile salt hydrolase (BSH), and antioxidant activity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation

The bacteria isolation from a newborn and identification at the genera level of B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 were previously reported by Olvera et al., 2013 [11].

2.2. DNA Extraction and Genotypic Identification

According to the manufacturer’s instructions, the total gDNA was isolated using the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega). The 16S rDNA was sequenced at the Divisional Molecular Biology Laboratory of Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana campus Iztapalapa, México City, using the set of primers Bif 164 and Bif 662 [12]. Comparisons and sequence alignments were made using MEGA5 [13] and NCBI´s primary local alignment search tool (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi; accessed on 9 May 2022).

2.3. Multilocus Sequence Analysis (MLSA)

This method is based on sequence comparison of housekeeping genes in the bacterial genome and generated a robust and highly discriminatory super tree that has been used to infer phylogeny in the genus Bifidobacterium [14]. MLSA was performed by concatenating fragments from seven conserved genes, i.e., clpC, dnaB, dnaG, dnaJ1, purF, rpoC, and xfp. The homologous sequences of the target genes were obtained from 12 bifidobacterial strains’ genomes using an in-house python script, concatenated and aligned with Clustal W [15]. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred using Maximum Likelihood-based on the Kimura 2-parameters model [16]. Bootstrap values of the tree were computed by resampling 100 times. The phylogenetic analysis was conducted in MEGA7 [17].

2.4. Genome Sequencing and Annotation

The samples were sequenced at the Integrated Microbiome Resource (IMR, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada) [18]. The assembly was also conducted by IMR using SMRT analysis software. After assembling the whole genome, the location of protein-coding sequences, tRNA genes, rRNA genes, tmRNA genes, and CRISPR were predicted using Prokka v1.12-beta [19]. Prokka conducts analysis based on ISfinder, NCBI Background Reference Gene DB (with tbl2asn v25.8 and blastp v2.2 tool), UniProtKB DB (with blastp v2.2 tool), and HMM DB (with hmmscan v3.1 tool). The following tools were used to predict each functional element: Prodigal v2.6 [20] for CDS prediction, RNAmmer v1.2 [21] for rRNA prediction, Aragorn v1.2 [22] for tRNA and transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) prediction, MinCED (https://github.com/ctSkennerton/minced; accessed on 13 June 2022) and CRISPRFinder [23] (last modified 9 May 2017) for Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) prediction and cmscan v1.1 [24] for sRNA prediction.

The protein-coding genes were functionally annotated using an hmm search (HMMER v3.3.2, November 2020) [25] with HMMs profiles (for a total of 4983 profiles) of Bifidobacteriales (last modified on 23 March 2020) extracted from the eggNOG v5.0.0 database [26]. We opted for HMMs profiles to obtain homologous sequences because of their sensitivity to detecting homology. The data were processed in a Python environment v3.6.7 through the platform Jupyter Notebook v6.0.3 using Pandas v1.0.4 and Numpy v1.18.5 packages. The Classes of Clusters of orthologous groups (COG) and Functional Categories assignment were performed to an E-value cutoff of 1E-5.

Enzymatic classification in B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 was predicted from B. pseudocatenulatum JCM 1200 deposited on the KEGG database (GenBank Assembly GCA_001025215.1, T_number: T03932 and Org_code: bpsc). The assignment was BLAST All-versus-All based using Blastp v2.8.1 and an in-house python script. The data were processed in a Python environment v3.6.7 through the platform Jupyter Notebook v6.0.3 using Pandas v1.0.4 and Numpy v1.18.5 packages. The best hits were selected to an E-value cutoff of 1E-5 and an Identity percentage greater than 40%. In addition, the architecture between both sets of proteins was compared using the Pfam functional annotation. The Pfam domains were predicted using pfam_scan.pl script v1.6. A circular plot was used to visualize CDS sequences and Enzyme classes. The circular plot was performed using an in-house python script through the platform Jupyter Notebook v6.0.3 using functions of the Matplotlib v3.0.3 package.

The putative operons for all CDSs were predicted using the Operon-Mapper tool [27], where default settings were used. GFF and FNA (complete genome in FASTA format) files were used. The data were processed through Jupyter Notebook v6.0.3 using Pandas v1.0.4 and Numpy v1.18.5 packages. A circular plot was used to visualize CDS sequences and Enzyme classes. The circular plot was performed as mentioned above. For the visualization of the genome, the following information was used: (i) the sequence of the complete genome in FASTA format (*.fna), and (ii) the genomic features in GFF (General Feature Format) format v3.0. The Genome circular plot was performed as mentioned above. The functional annotation and their distribution were also included in the circular plot.

2.5. Effect of Carbon Source on Growth of B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3

The growth kinetics was followed during 8 h of fermentation at 37 °C, using TPY medium independently added with 1% w/v of glucose (as a control), lactose, sucrose, or inulin. All media were adjusted to pH 7 with NaOH 0.1 M (Thermo Scientific Orion 410A+, MA, USA), and oxygen was removed from the medium by bubbling CO2 and sealed with a rubber stopper before sterilization. The samples were taken from time zero to 8 h every 2 h. The increase in biomass (mg/mL) was determined through optical density and a standardized curve of dry weight. The biomass was separated by centrifuging for 5 min at 3000× g. The pH of the supernatant was measured and then discarded. The pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of water, and the optical density was determined at 660 nm (Varian Inc., Cary 50, Palo Alto, CA, USA). All experiments were conducted in triplicate and are expressed as a mean with standard deviation.

2.6. Antibiotic Profile

The ability to resist antibiotics was determined using the multidisc PT-34 Multibac I.D. (Investigación Diagnóstica, CdMx, México) following the instructions of the supplier, which included β-lactam antibiotics: vancomycin (30 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), dicloxacillin (1 μg), cephalothin (30 μg), penicillin (10 U), cefotaxime (30 μg); inhibitors of protein synthesis gentamicin (10 μg), clindamycin (30 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), tetracycline (30 μg); inhibitors of nucleic acid synthesis ciprofloxacin (5 μg), and others, such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (25 μg). The profile of B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 (CHR Hansen) was determined to compare the antibiotic profile of B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3. All the experiments were carried out in triplicate [28].

2.7. Hemolysis Test

Before the test, the strains were incubated overnight in MRS broth supplemented with sucrose (2 g/L) and cysteine (0.5%). A 1 × 108 CFU/mL sample was plated onto blood agar and incubated for 48 h at 37 °C in an anaerobic chamber (Forma anaerobic system Model 1025, Thermo Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) with an atmosphere of 10% CO2, 5% H2, and 85% N2. For each strain, the test was carried out in triplicate. Escherichia coli ATCC 160211 was used as a positive control, and B. animalis subsp. Lactis Bb-12 as a negative control. The experiments were conducted in triplicate. Results were reported as follows: alpha indicating partial hemolysis, beta indicating total hemolysis, and gamma as non-hemolytic [28].

2.8. Antimicrobial Activity

The agar well diffusion assay [29] was used to evaluate the ability of the strain to inhibit E. coli ATCC 25922, E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella typhi ATCC14028, and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538. B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 and B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 (control) were grown on TPY agar at 1 × 107 CFU/mL concentration for each one and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Afterward, that warm, soft tryptic soy agar (8 g/L) was emptied into each Bifidobacterium culture. Once gelled, the other bacteria were plated individually onto the agar at a concentration of 108 CFU/mL. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h in an anaerobic atmosphere. The experiments were conducted in triplicate. The results were expressed as follows: no inhibition (-), moderate (+), and total inhibition (++).

2.9. Bile Salt Tolerance Assay

BSH activity was qualitatively determined by plate assay. Fresh bacterial cultures were dropped onto TPY agar containing 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5% (w/v) glycocholic or taurocholic acid (Sigma Aldrich, USA). Bacterial cultures were then anaerobically incubated at 37 °C for 48 h in an anaerobic atmosphere. Strains with BSH activity were surrounded by a halo of precipitated deconjugated bile salts [30] and were considered positive. B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 was used as a positive control, and the experiments were conducted in triplicate.

2.10. Tolerance to the Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT)

This tolerance implied the ability to survive simulated saliva (SS), simulated gastric fluid (SGF), and simulated intestinal fluid (SIF). SS consisted of a sterilized solution of pH 6.2 of phosphate buffer (PBS) and 0.01% (w/v) lysozyme. SGF was prepared with PBS adjusted with HCL (1M) (J.T. Baker, USA) to pH 1.5 and 0.1% pepsin. All the simulated fluids were prepared according to [28,31]. The SIF consisted of a sterilized PBS pH 6.8 supplemented with 0.5% (w/v) oxgall and 0.1% pancreatin. The tolerance was determined by comparing the cell count before and after exposure to each stress condition. The initial concentration of 1 × 108 CFU /mL was mixed with SS and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions with gentle shaking. After incubation, the solution was separated by centrifugation at 3000× g for 5 min; the pellet was washed twice with phosphate buffer pH 7, suspended in 1 mL SGF, and incubated at 37 °C for 90 min in anaerobic conditions with gentle shaking. Afterward, the solution was centrifuged under the same conditions mentioned above to separate the pellet, then suspended in 1 mL SIF and incubated at 37 °C for 150 min with gentle shaking. The experiments also were conducted using the same solutions with or without enzymes and in a sequential and non-sequential manner. The viability was also tested at pH 2, 3, and 5. B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 was tested to compare the experiments. All the experiments were carried out in triplicate. The results were expressed as % of viability, considering the initial count by plate assay as 100%.

2.11. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity Assay

The 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH, Sigma) radical scavenging activity to test antioxidant activity in intact cells, intracellular cell-free extracts, and cell debris of B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 and B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 was conducted according to the method proposed by Su et al. (2015) [32]. The strains were harvested by centrifugation at 4400× g for 10 min. The supernatant was considered a cell-free extract. For the preparation of intact cells, the pellet was washed three times with PBS and finally suspended in the same buffer. For the preparation of cell debris, overnight cultures were treated as above, and cell extract suspended in PBS was subjected to ultrasonic disruption (1:1 min treatment: ice bath, 5 times) and then centrifuged at 7800× g for 20 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was discarded, and the cell debris was suspended in PBS.

The DPPH assay of the strains was analyzed by mixing one milliliter of freshly prepared DPPH solution (0.2 mmol/L in methanol) with 1 mL of sample solution. Then, the mixture was allowed to react for 30 min in the dark. The absorbance was measured with a UV-visible spectrophotometer at 517 nm. The assay was performed by three independent experiments. The DPPH scavenging ability was calculated using the formula:

%DPPH=1[Abs517(sample)/Abs517(PBS)]×100

2.12. Adhesion Assay

Caco-2 cells (ATCC® HTB-37™) were cultivated in Eagle’s minimal essential medium (Gibco Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% L-glutamine, and 1% (v/v) nonessential amino acids solution (Gibco). The cells were seeded in 24-well culture plates (1  ×  105 cells per well) and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2. After about 24 h, a confluent monolayer was obtained, and the plates were incubated for 15 days. Overnight growth of the strain B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 or B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 (used to establish the 100% adhesion) was harvested by centrifugation at 6000× g for 5 min at 4 °C, washed twice with PBS (pH 7.4), and suspended in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium without antibiotic and fetal bovine serum. Each bacterial suspension (1 mL of 1 × 108 CFU/mL) was added to the 24-well plates and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. After, each well was washed three times with PBS (pH 7.4) to remove non-adherent bacteria. The adhered bacteria were detached from the monolayer with a solution of trypsin–EDTA (Gibco) in PBS; the enzymes were inactivated with a culture medium. Serial dilutions were plated onto MRS agar plates supplemented with 0.5% L-cysteine hydrochloride (Merck), and the bacterial colonies were counted after 48 h of incubation under anaerobic conditions [33]. All the experiments were carried out in triplicate.

2.13. Statistical Analysis

Media and standard deviation were calculated in all the experiments. The results of the experiments were compared by T student or ANOVA using p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Genotypic Identification

The multilocus analysis showed that JCLA3 belongs to the pseudocatenulatum species (Figure 1). The complete genome was registered at Gene bank CP090598 as B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3. The BioProject accession number is PRJNA795522.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Multilocus sequence analysis and Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree based on bifidobacterial genomes sequences available in GenBank. B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 identified and characterized in this study are denoted in bold type. The solid arrows indicate the genes used for the construction of the multilocus, and the direction reflects their orientation within the genome of each Bifidobacterium strain.

3.2. Genome Analysis

B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 has one circular genome of 2,369,863 bp with a G + C content of 56.6%, with no plasmids (Figure 2). The genomic annotations illustrated a total of 1937 coding sequences (CDSs).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Circular genomic map of B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3. Genes were grouped into categories according to their functionality.

The genome of B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 possessing 54 tRNAs, 16 rRNAs (including 16S, 23S, and 5S rRNA), 1 tmRNA, and 1832 CDSs (94.57%) were assigned to COG categories. In addition, the B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 contained a clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) region (1,723,829 to 1,726,407) associated with cas genes.

The 23.46% of the COG category assignment were of genes with unknown function, 9.79% carbohydrate transport and metabolism, 8.92% amino acid transport and metabolism, 7.34% translation ribosomal structure, and biogenesis, 6.83% transcription and 6.83% replication, recombination, and repair, whereas 5.43% genes were not placed into the COGs (Figure 2).

The genome of B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 also encodes an extensive number of enzymes: 184 transferases (11.28%), 178 hydrolases (10.91%), 67 oxidoreductases (4.11%), 64 ligases (3.92%), 47 lyases (2.88%), 38 isomerases (2.33%) and 21 translocases (1.29%) (Figure 3 and Table S1).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Grouped enzymes according to their functionality and some operons coding on the B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 genome.

B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 contain two ldh genes, one at position 62,018 to 63,001 and the other at 1,593,405 to 1,594,367 bp; and one ack gene (968,782 to 970,011 bp), encoding a lactate dehydrogenase (EC1.1.1.27) and acetate kinase (EC 2.7.2.1), respectively. The ack gene was found as part of an operon formed by three genes (xfp, pta and ack) at positions 964,348 to 970,011 bp (Figure 3) that correspond to -xylulose 5-phosphate/d-fructose 6-phosphate phosphoketolase (EC 4.1.2.9), phosphate acetyltransferase (EC 2.3.1.8), and acetate kinase (EC 2.7.2.1).

In addition, the B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 genome contains 401 operons with more than two CDS, some shown in Figure 3. Moreover, the genome showed biosynthetic capabilities regarding amino acids, such as arginine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, lysine, histidine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophane. According to the genome information, the biosynthesis of arginine could be mediated by glutamate dehydrogenase (EC 1.4.1.4), aspartate aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.1), argininosuccinate lyase (EC 4.3.2.1), argininosuccinate synthase (EC 6.3.4.5), ornithine carbamoyltransferase (EC 2.1.3.3), acetylornithine/N-succinyldiaminopimelate aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.11 and 2.6.1.17), acetylglutamate kinase (EC 2.7.2.8), glutamate N-acetyltransferase (EC 2.3.1.35), amino-acid N-acetyltransferase (EC 2.3.1.1), N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate reductase (EC 1.2.1.38), glutamine synthetase (EC 6.3.1.2) and N-acetylglutamate synthase (EC 2.3.1.1). Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis could involve ketol-acid reductoisomerase (EC 1.1.1.86), 2-isopropylmalate synthase (EC 2.3.3.13), 3-isopropylmalate/(R)-2-methylmalate dehydratase (EC 4.2.1.33 and 4.2.1.35), acetolactate synthase I/III (EC 2.2.1.6), dihydroxy-acid dehydratase (EC 4.2.1.9), branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.42), alanine-synthesizing transaminase (EC 2.6.1.66), and 3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.85). Lysine could be synthesized by aspartate kinase (EC 2.7.2.4) and aspartate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase (EC 1.2.1.11), succinyl-diaminopimelate desuccinylase (EC 3.5.1.18), 2,3,4,5-tetrahydropyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate N-succinyltransferase (EC 2.3.1.117), acetylornithine/N-succinyldiaminopimelate aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.11 and 2.6.1.17), UDP-N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanyl-D-glutamate-2,6-diaminopimelate ligase (EC 6.3.2.13), UDP-N-acetylmuramoyl-tripeptide-D-alanyl-D-alanine ligase (EC 6.3.2.10), diaminopimelate epimerase (EC 5.1.1.7), 4-hydroxy-tetrahydrodipicolinate synthase (EC 4.3.3.7), 4-hydroxy-tetrahydrodipicolinate reductase (EC 1.17.1.8), homoserine dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.3), and diaminopimelate decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.20). The biosynthesis of histidine is carried out by 1-(5-phosphoribosyl)-5-[(5-phosphoribosylamino) methylideneamino] imidazole-4-carboxamide isomerase (EC 5.3.1.16 and 5.3.1.24). Phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophane could be biosynthesized by aspartate aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.1), 3-deoxy-7-phosphoheptulonate synthase (EC 2.5.1.54); 3-phosphoshikimate 1-carboxyvinyltransferase (EC 2.5.1.19), chorismate synthase (EC 4.2.3.5), shikimate kinase/3-dehydroquinate synthase (EC 2.7.1.71), 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase II (EC4.2.1.10), anthranilate synthase component I (EC 4.1.3.27), anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase (EC 2.4.2.18), prephenate dehydrogenase (EC 1.3.1.12), chorismate mutase (EC 5.4.99.5) prephenate dehydratase (EC 4.2.1.51), phosphoribosyl isomerase A (EC 5.3.1.16), and histidinol-phosphate aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.9).

B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 showed genes involved in the biosynthesis of hydrosoluble vitamins, such as folate (B9) and pantothenate (B5). For the biosynthesis of folate, B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 contains different genes codifying enzymes, such as para-aminobenzoate synthase glutamine amidotransferase (EC 2.6.1.85), GTP cyclohydrolase IA (EC 3.5.4.16), dihydropteroate synthase (EC 2.5.1.15), dihydroneopterin aldolase (EC 4.1.2.25), 2-amino-4-hydroxy-6-hydroxymethyldihydropteridine diphosphokinase (EC 2.7.6.3), dihydrofolate synthase (EC 6.3.2.12), and folylpolyglutamate synthase (EC6.3.2.17).

In the case of pantothenate, the gene was found codifying to ketol-acid reductoisomerase (EC 1.1.1.86), acetolactate synthase I/III (EC 2.2.1.6), pantetheine-phosphate adenylyltransferase (EC 2.7.7.3), dihydroxy-acid dehydratase (EC 4.2.1.9), holo-[acyl-carrier protein] synthase (EC 2.7.8.7), dephospho-CoA kinase (EC 2.7.1.24), 2-dehydropantoate 2-reductase (EC 1.1.1.169), phosphopantothenoylcysteine decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.36), phosphopantothenate-cysteine ligase (EC 6.3.2.5), type III pantothenate kinase (EC 2.7.1.33), and branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.42). Another important biosynthetic capability found in the genome was secondary bile acid biosynthesis by choloylglycine hydrolase (EC 3.5.1.24).

3.3. Biochemical Characterization of B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3

3.3.1. Effect of Carbon Source on Growth

The kinetics of B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 on different carbon sources are shown in Figure 4. The strain grew in all the substrates and showed similar kinetics (p > 0.05), initiating the exponential phase between 4–8 h.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effect of different carbon sources on the growth of B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3. Continuous lines in grey correspond to the biomass obtained, and dotted lines in black indicate changes in pH regarding different carbon sources. ○ glucose (control); ● sucrose; ■ inulin; □ lactose; and pH of the medium along time.

3.3.2. Antibiotic Profile

B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 displayed resistance to β-lactam antibiotics (ampicillin and cephalothin) as well as B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12. However, B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 also showed resistance to dicloxacillin and inhibitors of protein and nucleic acid synthesis (Table 1a).

Table 1.

Biochemical characterization of B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3.

Strains
B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12
(a) Antibiotic profile *
Vancomycin
S S
Ampicillin R R
Trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole S S
Gentamicin S S
Dicloxacillin S R
Cephalothin R R
Clindamycin S S
Erythromycin S S
Penicillin S S
Tetracycline S R
Cefotaxime S S
Ciprofloxacin S R
(b) Hemolysis
(c) Antimicrobial activity
E. coli ATCC 25922 + ++
Escherichia coli O157: H7 ++
Salmonella typhi ATCC14028 ++
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 + +
(d) Bile salt tolerance assay
Glycocholic acid 0.1–0.5% + +
Taurocholic acid 0.1–0.5% + +
Glycodeoxycholic acid 0.1–0.5% + +
Taurodeoxycholic acid 0.1–0.5% + +
(e) Tolerance to GIT
Simulated saliva 100% 100%
Simulated gastric fluid 0% 2.26%
Simulated intestinal fluid 0% 0%

* Antibiotic test: S: sensible; R: resistance; +: growth in the medium containing each bile salt. Antimicrobial activity: no inhibition (−), moderate (+), and total inhibition (++).

3.3.3. Hemolysis Test

Regarding hemolysis, B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 and B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 did not show activity on the blood agar plate (Table 1b).

3.3.4. Antimicrobial Activity

B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 and B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 were tested for antimicrobial activity against different strains (Table 1c). The B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 strain showed a weak inhibitory activity over E. coli ATCC 25922 and S. aureus ATCC 6538. However, no inhibition was observed for E. coli O157:H7 and S. typhi ATCC14028. In contrast, the Bb-12 strain showed total inhibition of tested strains except for S. aureus ATCC 6538, which was weak.

3.3.5. Bile Salt Tolerance

B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 and B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 were able to tolerate concentrations of primary and secondary bile salts, such as the ones found in the GIT (Table 1d). In the cases of secondary bile salts, a halo of precipitation was observed (Figure 5). The genomic analysis showed that B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 contains the cbh gene that codifies to choloylglycine hydrolase (EC 3.5.1.24), which can deconjugate bile salts. In addition, a sodium bile acid symporter family (BASS) was found (data found in the genome).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Bile salt tolerance. Growth of one colony of B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 in TPY medium added with glico and tauro cholic acids (primary bile salts) and glico and taurodeoxycholic acids (secondary bile salts) at 0.5%.

3.3.6. Tolerance to the Gastrointestinal Tract

The tolerance to sequential simulated gastrointestinal solutions showed that B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 and B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 have a 100% viability in SS. B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 could not survive under SGF due to pH 1.5 and pepsin for 90 min. This pH is commonly present in the stomach during fasting, and the time is similar to the amount of time that food remains in the stomach during digestion. To know which showed the inhibitory effect, we tested pH 1.5 and pepsin independently, but both conditions did not show any growth within 90 min. Then we tested the ability to survive under pH 1.5 at different time periods. As a result, the strain B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 survived for less than 10 min. In addition, it could not survive under pH 2, 3, and 5 for 90 min. These pH values are like those obtained in the stomach after eating. When the viability was tested non-sequentially in SIF, no viability was found. Nevertheless, when SIF was used without the addition of pancreatin, the loss compared to the initial count was 99.93% (Table 1e).

B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 tolerated acidity and pepsin with a loss of 99% of viability. When the effect of pH was tested without adding pepsin, the loss diminished to 97%. Additionally, we tested the ability to grow at pH 1.5 during the 90 min period, and it was found that B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 was 100% viable after 30 min and lost 99.99% of viability at 60 min. When it was grown at pH 2 and 3 after 150 min, a 99% of loss of viability was shown in both cases. The tolerance to SIF was tested non-sequentially in the absence and presence of pancreatin, but no viability was shown.

3.3.7. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity Assay

B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 showed antioxidant ability in cell-free extracts and intact cells (5% and 35%, respectively) and B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 showed 2% and 25%, respectively. In contrast, the cell debris of B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 demonstrated a higher antioxidant ability (20%) than B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 (15%) (Figure 6a). Differences among groups were statistically different (p < 0.05).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(a) DPPH scavenging ability in intact cells, cell-free extract, and cell debris to B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 and  B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3. (b) Percentage of adhesion  B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 and  B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3. * Means significant difference between the same microorganism but different sample. ** means significant difference between different Bifidobacterium species.

Through genomic annotation, we found that 80 genes could be implicated in the antioxidant potential showed by B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3. Some of these genes are related to the expression of proteins, such as Multifunctional fusion protein (Including Cytidylate kinase (CK) (EC 2.7.4.25), Cytidine monophosphate kinase (CMP kinase), and GTPase Der (GTP-binding protein EngA)), ABC transporter ATP-binding protein, Ferredoxin, and Thioredoxin, among others.

3.3.8. Adhesion Assay

A desirable trait for probiotic bacteria is the ability to adhere to the intestinal epithelium or mucus layer, as this may increase the residence time in the GIT and facilitate interactions with host cells. In this study, we observed that the B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 strain could adhere up to 4% to the human epithelial cells Caco-2, whereas B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 increased this property by two-fold (Figure 6) (p < 0.05).

Genome analysis of the B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 strain showed that the presence of lspA (Bifido1_01405), dnaK (Bifido1_01970), grpE (Bifido1_01969), aprE (Bifido1_01605), fimA (Bifido1_00926), EF-Tu (Bifido1_00617), dppB3 (Bifido1_00550), grpE (Bifido1_01968), and tadE (Bifido1_00166) genes might be responsible for adhesion.

4. Discussion

The genomic and biochemical characterization of microorganisms provides insights into identifying possible human health applications and understanding the mechanism involved. Prior to this study, an isolated bacterium was classified in the genera Bifidobacterium; nevertheless, its species was not established. In this study, we classify this microorganism as B. pseudocatenulatum using V2-V4 regions and the multilocus analysis, which allowed us to increase the discriminatory power between Bifidobacterium species. Few studies have explored the genome of B. pseudocatenulatum, and few have related the genome with its biochemical characterization and functionality to establish and understand potential human health applications. In this study, we found that B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 could metabolize large amounts of mono and oligosaccharides, illustrating the complexity of different carbohydrate consumption and their specific regulation. Bifidobacteria are believed to play an important role in carbohydrate fermentation in the colon. They can indeed ferment various complex carbon sources, such as gastric mucin, xylo-oligosaccharides, (trans)-galactooligosaccharides, soybean oligosaccharides, malto-oligosaccharides, fructo-oligosaccharides, pectin, and other plant derived-oligosaccharides, although the ability to metabolize carbohydrates is species- and strain-dependent and via bifid-shunt such have been reported in Bifidobacterium NCC2705 [34].

B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 contains a variety of genes that code for different enzyme activities (Table S2), such as glycosyl hydrolases, with the formation of acetate, lactate, ethanol, and even small amounts of succinate, as end products [35], which could reflect its adaptation to the human’s gastrointestinal environment [36]. By genome annotation, we found that B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 has 44 predicted glycosyl hydrolases (Table S2), which can act over a wide range of di-, tri-, and higher order oligosaccharides. Bifidobacterium carries out an anaerobic fermentative metabolism, obtaining energy in the ATP form by phosphorylation at the substrate level during the hydrolysis of carbohydrates. Glycoside hydrolases are a group of enzymes synthesized by bacteria residing in the colon and used to break down dietary, non-digestible, and plant-derived carbohydrates as an energy source. Once internalized into the cytoplasm, hexose monosaccharides (e.g., fructose and glucose) are converted into acetate and lactate by the fructose 6-phosphate phosphoketolase pathway [37]. Acetate and lactate cross-feeding interact between Bifidobacteria and butyrate-producing colon bacteria in the human colon [38]. In addition to the hydrolases, B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 contains 70 genes involved in ABC transporter systems, responsible for the uptake of various carbohydrates, six genes related to ATP-binding cassette, and a single PTS (phosphotransferase system). Transport of ribose, stachyose, melibiose, maltose, xylobiose, galactofuranose, and arabinogalactan oligomer/maltooligosaccharide to be facilitated by ABC-type systems in this microorganism, while glucose is internalized using a PTS system. Previously, Olvera et al. (2013) [11] induced gene expression of ack and ldh in the Bifidobacterium studied, which was induced by lactose, inulin, sucrose, and glucose, and reported the mRNA level expression of these genes.

Although Bifidobacteria have been studied for over one century, the lack of genetic information has limited insights into their biosynthetic capabilities [39]. B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 showed a positive association with essential amino acid pathways, such as L-isoleucine biosynthesis I (from threonine), L-valine biosynthesis, and L-lysine biosynthesis VI. The above information suggests that B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 can be a particularly beneficial bacterium in improving brain function by modulating the availability and metabolism of essential amino acids as a key regulator of the gut-brain axis [10].

Another important biosynthetic capability in the genome was secondary bile acid biosynthesis by choloylglycine hydrolase (EC 3.5.1.24), an enzyme with possible applications in hypercholesterolemia. Some probiotics show hypocholesterolemic effects in animal models due to reductions in lipid and cholesterol levels since BSH can deconjugate bile salts, inducing a de novo synthesis of conjugated salts at the expense of cholesterol, resulting in decreasing serum levels, alterations in energy, homeostasis and the excretion of larger amounts of free bile acids in feces, thus making BSH a clinically significant enzyme [40]. The BSH showed affinity to glycine and taurine secondary conjugates. However, quantification of the activity is required to determine if it is more efficiently deconjugating one or the other [41].

Probiotics have some proposed mechanisms in the elimination of cholesterol, such as the assimilation of cholesterol by growing cells, the binding of cholesterol to the cellular surface, the incorporation of cholesterol into the cellular membrane, the production of short-chain fatty acids by oligosaccharides, the deconjugation of bile via BSH, and the coprecipitation of cholesterol with deconjugated bile [42]. An important aspect shown by the genome of B. pseudocatenolatum JCLA3 is the presence of the cholylglycine hydrolase gene (3.5.1.24), an enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of glycine and/or taurine–conjugated bile salts into amino acid residues and free bile acids [43]. Deconjugated bile salts are less soluble and less efficiently reabsorbed from the intestinal lumen than their conjugated counterparts. This results in the excretion of more significant amounts of free bile acids in feces [28].

Several Bifidobacteria are resistant to β-lactam antibiotics, as reported previously [44]. In the case of B. pseudocatenulatum, the strain B7003 has shown resistance to ampicillin in higher doses (MIC > 500 mg/mL, 100 μg/mL) [45,46] than those tested in this study. However, the resistance depends on the method used and the unrelatedness of the strains; then, there is still a lack of agreement in the resistance susceptibility breakpoints for most antibiotics [47]. Di Gioia et al. (2013) [46] evaluated the presence of blaCTX-M1 and two genes that codify to β-lactamases, related to β-lactam resistance. Nevertheless, we did not find these, but at least ten genes were found to be related to β-lactam resistance. These genes, in general, codify to peptidoglycan synthase, putative ABC transporter substrate-binding or ATP-binding component, putative β-hexosaminidase, dipeptide ABC transporter ATP-binding, permease, or substrate-binding components. Particularly, we found oppA, oppB, oppC, and oppF genes are involved in Quorum sensing (Qs) and β-lactam resistance; as has been reported, the signals of the Qs could trigger changes in gene expression, regulate various cellular processes, which mainly involve the regulation of drug resistance and other. B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 does not contain plasmids, which represents an important feature considering that transmissible antibiotic resistances are in most strains encoded by plasmid DNA. Therefore, B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 possesses resistance to some antibiotics, but they are all chromosomally encoded. Therefore, their spread to other bacteria can be considered a rare event [46].

Regarding hemolysis, B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 and B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 did not show activity on the blood agar plate (Table 1b), in agreement with other studies showing that this activity is rarely present in Bifidobacterium [48].

B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 and B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 showed different levels of antimicrobial activity probably due to different mechanisms, such as the production of short-chain fatty acids, mainly acetic and lactic acids, the production of hydrogen peroxide, which is the mechanism used to inhibit S. aureus, and the production of proteinaceous compounds, such as bacteriocins [49,50,51].

The tolerance to sequential simulated gastrointestinal solutions showed that B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 could overcome simulated saliva, so we hypothesized that the time that food is in the mouth is not enough for lysozymes to produce damage in the B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 cell structure. However, the conditions found in the stomach and intestine during fasting or digestion can be very aggressive and, in some cases, can have a synergistic effect on the cell wall structure, such as in the case of the mix of bile salts used in the SIF since B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 was able to grow in the presence of primary bile salts (Table 1e). Finally, these results indicate that if B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 will, in turn, be used as a supplement, it must be administered by using a protective matrix. In the case of B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 (control strain) acidity and the mix of bile salts strongly affected viability. It has been well known that the viability of Bifidobacteria in gastric and intestinal juices is different at the strain level and is affected by several factors. These factors include the degree of acidity in the stomach, the duration of exposure to acids in the gastric juice, the concentration and duration of exposure to bile salts, the level of BSH activity, the enzymes present in the gastrointestinal tract, intestinal motility, as well as the bacterial phase growth and to the method of delivery of the bacteria to the digestive tract [52].

Whether Bifidobacteria colonize from birth or are ingested as a probiotic, they will encounter and must overcome stresses in the GIT with bile being the major stress-inducing factor to bacteria, due to its bactericidal properties. Different mechanisms of bile resistance by Bifidobacteria have been set, including the efflux of bile salts by multi-drug transporters, compositional changes of the cell membrane, F0F1-ATPase proton efflux, changes in metabolism, and hydrolysis of bile salts [53]. Previous studies have shown that biofilm formation by Bifidobacterium protects them from high concentrations of bile. In the genome of B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3, we found genes related to the production of biofilm components, which codify to glycan, exopolysaccharide (EPS), and lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis, many glycosyltransferases related to exopolysaccharide biosynthesis [54] and an AI-2 transporter was found. In fact, AI-2-dependent quorum sensing has been implicated in the formation of biofilm in other bacteria [55]. B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 is one of the Bifidobacteria members able to produce extracellular EPS [54]. Nevertheless, it is necessary to test in vitro if B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 can produce EPS and biofilm, and to investigate the specific in vitro conditions that allow their production. In addition, it will be necessary to characterize them since, for instance, EPS with high molecular weight has been able to suppress the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. In contrast, EPS with small molecular weight or acidic EPS had immune-stimulating properties in Bifidobacterium [54]. In addition, the response to high bile concentration in Bifidobacterium has been shown to involve a specific response in carbohydrate metabolism. It has been reported that fatty acid synthesis is important for bile resistance when Bifidobacteria are exposed to bile; therefore, changes in surface hydrophobicity and perhaps membrane permeability due to altered fatty acid synthesis may help to resist the bactericidal effects of bile [53]. In the case of B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12, its growth in bile salts, and the presence of the gene coding for BSH have been previously reported [56].

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced by aerobic respiration and the immune defense of organisms. Excessive amounts of ROS can result in cellular damage, which promotes chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and cancer. Certain probiotic strains present significant antioxidant effects and can act as antioxidants to maintain intestinal redox balance in the gut by adhering to and colonizing the intestinal lumen [57].

The antioxidative potential of Bifidobacteria has been previously reported using the DPPH free radical scavenging method. We reported that intact cells and cell-free extracts of B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 showed higher ability in vitro, which was similar to the antioxidant activity of Bifidobacteria isolated described by Shen et al. (2011) [58]; Kim et al. (2003) [59] and Lin and Chang, (2000). The antioxidative effects in B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 could have been present because Bifidobacteria can produce antioxidative compounds [60], and polymers with antioxidant protective effects such as EPS [61]. In addition, we observed in B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 antioxidant-related genes, such as PNPOx (pyridoxine 5′-phosphate oxidase); AhpC (alkyl hydroperoxide reductase subunit C) considered as an antioxidant protein; Bcp (tiol peroxidase) a member of peroxiredoxin, which exhibits hydroperoxide peroxidase activities; trxA (thioredoxin), trxB (thioredoxin reductase) thioredoxin system plays a crucial role in defense against ROS for anaerobes, and nrdH (glutaredoxin), and mntH (manganese transport protein), a transporter selective for manganese that acts as a co-factor of antioxidant enzymes and non-proteinaceous manganese antioxidants [57]. In addition, we found that trxB and AhpC and, on the other hand, nrdH and nrdl (ribonucleotide reductase stimulatory protein) were found as operons.

The adhesion of probiotics to human GIT Is considered one of the main criteria for the bacteria to benefit health. The adhesion ability of probiotics is dependent and is influenced by physicochemical and biological conditions. It depends on environmental factors, such as pH and temperature, the ionic strength of the medium, as well as characteristics of both the bacteria and substrate, such as surface free energy, the presence of bacterial surface structures, such as specific attachment proteins, and their hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity. The genome of the B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 strain contains cell adhesion genes associated with probiotic properties: fibronectin/fibrinogen binding proteins and mucus-binding proteins. As reported by Westermean et al. [62], Bifidobacterium species have reported the presence of moonlighting proteins involved in the adhesion of bacteria to host tissues [62], such as transaldolases (mucin binding protein), enolase, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, DnaK, BSH, and phosphoglycerate mutase among others).

5. Conclusions

The complete genome of B. pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 was comparable in size to other B. pseudocatenulatum strains. Its knowledge allows us to further understand the role of this bacterium in the metabolism of carbohydrates and the catalytic tools it uses to adapt in the gastrointestinal tract of mammals. It also provides valuable information on the details of its possible functional properties, such as antimicrobial, BSH, and antioxidant activity, adhesion, and certain safety at the genotype level and, in turn, will increase the knowledge of its possible properties and the genes related to possible health effects and may lead to genome-based biotechnological applications in human healthcare and food science.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the research strengthening program of the Rector of UAM Xochimilco, 2021.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10112100/s1, Table S1: Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum encoded enzymes. Table S2: Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum’s genes associated with carbohydrate metabolism, their respective enzymes, and the possible pathway in which they play a role according to the KEGG database.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.G.-V., A.A.-E., L.M.-R., F.M.-P. and M.L.-L.; methodology, R.G.-V., E.Z.-L., N.C.H.-D. and R.P.-P.-B.; formal analysis, A.A.-E., L.M.-R., E.T.-M. and F.M.-P.; investigation, R.G.-V. and N.C.H.-D.; data curation, E.Z.-L.; writing—original draft preparation, R.G.-V., A.A.-E., L.M.-R., F.M.-P., M.L.-L., E.T.-M. and E.Z.-L.; writing—review and editing, R.G.-V., A.A.-E., L.M.-R., F.M.-P., M.L.-L., E.T.-M. and E.Z.-L.; visualization, R.G.-V., A.A.-E., L.M.-R., F.M.-P., M.L.-L., E.T.-M. and E.Z.-L.; project administration, R.G.-V., A.A.-E. and L.M.-R.; funding acquisition, R.G.-V., A.A.-E., M.L.-L. and L.M.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available from the NCBI in the BioProject PRJNA795522.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Duranti S., Ruiz L., Lugli G.A., Tames H., Milani C., Mancabelli L., Mancino W., Longhi G., Carnevali L., Sgoifo A., et al. Bifidobacterium adolescentis as a key member of the human gut microbiota in the production of GABA. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:14112. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70986-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lawson M.A.E., O’Neill I.J., Kujawska M., Gowrinadh Javvadi S., Wijeyesekera A., Flegg Z., Chalklen L., Hall L.J. Breast milk-derived human milk oligosaccharides promote Bifidobacterium interactions within a single ecosystem. ISME J. 2020;14:635–648. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0553-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Salazar N., Neyrinck A.M., Bindels L.B., Druart C., Ruas-Madiedo P., Cani P.D., de Los Reyes-Gavilán C.G., Delzenne N.M. Functional Effects of EPS-Producing Bifidobacterium Administration on Energy Metabolic Alterations of Diet-Induced Obese Mice. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:1809. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moya-Pérez A., Neef A., Sanz Y. Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum CECT 7765 Reduces Obesity-Associated Inflammation by Restoring the Lymphocyte-Macrophage Balance and Gut Microbiota Structure in High-Fat Diet-Fed Mice. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0126976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Leahy S.C., Higgins D.G., Fitzgerald G.F., van Sinderen D. Getting better with bifidobacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005;98:1303–1315. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02600.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Usta-Gorgun B., Yilmaz-Ersan L. Short-chain fatty acids production by Bifidobacterium species in the presence of salep. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2020;47:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejbt.2020.06.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cronin M., Ventura M., Fitzgerald G.F., van Sinderen D. Progress in genomics, metabolism and biotechnology of bifidobacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011;149:4–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) Rychen G., Aquilina G., Azimonti G., Bampidis V., Bastos M.d.L., Bories G., Chesson A., Cocconcelli P.S., Flachowsky G., et al. Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms. EFSA J. 2018;16:e05206. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Alegría Á., Delgado S., Guadamuro L., Flórez A.B., Felis G.E., Torriani S., Mayo B. The genome of Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum IPLA 36007, a human intestinal strain with isoflavone-activation activity. Gut Pathog. 2014;6:31. doi: 10.1186/1757-4749-6-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang J., Qie J., Zhu D., Zhang X., Zhang Q., Xu Y., Wang Y., Mi K., Pei Y., Liu Y., et al. The landscape in the gut microbiome of long-lived families reveals new insights on longevity and aging—relevant neural and immune function. Gut Microbes. 2022;14:2107288. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2107288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Olvera R.N., Gutiérrez N.A., Azaola E.A., Mayorga R.L. Characterization of a Bifidobacterium sp. strain isolated from human faeces and its expression of the ack and ldh genes. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2013;7:5713–5718. doi: 10.5897/AJMR2013.5745. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kok R.G., de Waal A., Schut F., Welling G.W., Weenk G., Hellingwerf K.J. Specific detection and analysis of a probiotic Bifidobacterium strain in infant feces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996;62:3668–3672. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.10.3668-3672.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011;28:2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ventura M., Canchaya C., Casale A.D., Franco D., Erasmo N., Fitzgerald G.F., Sinderen D.v. Analysis of bifidobacterial evolution using a multilocus approach. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006;56:2783–2792. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64233-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 1980;16:111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kumar S., Stecher G., Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016;33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Comeau André M., Douglas Gavin M., Langille Morgan G.I. Microbiome Helper: A Custom and Streamlined Workflow for Microbiome Research. mSystems. 2017;2:e00127-16. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00127-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Seemann T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hyatt D., Chen G.L., Locascio P.F., Land M.L., Larimer F.W., Hauser L.J. Prodigal: Prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Karin L., Peter H., Andreas R.E., Hans-Henrik S., Torbjørn R., Ussery D.W. RNAmmer:consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Laslett D., Canback B. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Grissa I., Vergnaud G., Pourcel C. CRISPRFinder: A web tool to identify clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W52–W57. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kalvari I., PNawrocki E., Argasinska J., Quinones-Olvera N., DFinn R., Bateman A., IPetrov A. Non-coding RNA analysis using the Rfam database. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2018;62:351. doi: 10.1002/cpbi.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Eddy S.R. Accelerated Profile HMM Searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011;7:e1002195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Huerta-Cepas J., Szklarczyk D., Heller D., Hernández-Plaza A., Forslund S.K., Cook H., Mende D.R., Letunic I., Rattei T., Jensen L.J., et al. eggNOG 5.0: A hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D309–D314. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Taboada B., Estrada K., Ciria R., Merino E. Operon-mapper: A web server for precise operon identification in bacterial and archaeal genomes. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:4118–4120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.González-Vázquez R., Azaola-Espinosa A., Mayorga-Reyes L., Reyes-Nava L.A., Shah N.P., Rivera-Espinoza Y. Isolation, Identification and Partial Characterization of a Lactobacillus casei Strain with Bile Salt Hydrolase Activity from Pulque. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins. 2015;7:242–248. doi: 10.1007/s12602-015-9202-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Presti I., D’Orazio G., Labra M., La Ferla B., Mezzasalma V., Bizzaro G., Giardina S., Michelotti A., Tursi F., Vassallo M., et al. Evaluation of the probiotic properties of new Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains and their in vitro effect. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015;99:5613–5626. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6482-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zuo F., Yu R., Feng X., Chen L., Zeng Z., Khaskheli G.B., Ma H., Chen S. Characterization and in vitro properties of potential probiotic Bifidobacterium strains isolated from breast-fed infant feces. Ann. Microbiol. 2016;66:1027–1037. doi: 10.1007/s13213-015-1187-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Olivares-Romero R., Faustino A., Miranda-Calderon J.E., González-Vázquez R., Azaola-Espinosa A. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 increases relative survival under simulated gastrointestinal tract stress. Rev. Mex. Ing. Químic. 2018;17:641–650. doi: 10.24275/uam/izt/dcbi/revmexingquim/2018v17n2/Olivarez. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Su J., Wang T., Li Y.-Y., Li J., Zhang Y., Wang Y., Wang H., Li H. Antioxidant properties of wine lactic acid bacteria: Oenococcus oeni. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015;99:5189–5202. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6425-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Muñoz-Provencio D., Pérez-Martínez G., Monedero V. Characterization of a fibronectin-binding protein from Lactobacillus casei BL23. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010;108:1050–1059. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04508.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Duboux S., Muller J.A., De Franceschi F., Mercenier A., Kleerebezem M. Using fluorescent promoter-reporters to study sugar utilization control in Bifidobacterium longum NCC 2705. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:10477. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14638-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schell M.A., Karmirantzou M., Snel B., Vilanova D., Berger B., Pessi G., Zwahlen M.C., Desiere F., Bork P., Delley M., et al. The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum reflects its adaptation to the human gastrointestinal tract. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:14422–14427. doi: 10.1073/pnas.212527599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pokusaeva K., Fitzgerald G.F., van Sinderen D. Carbohydrate metabolism in Bifidobacteria. Genes Nutr. 2011;6:285–306. doi: 10.1007/s12263-010-0206-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.De Vuyst L., Leroy F. Cross-feeding between bifidobacteria and butyrate-producing colon bacteria explains bifdobacterial competitiveness, butyrate production, and gas production. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011;149:73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Moens F., Verce M., De Vuyst L. Lactate- and acetate-based cross-feeding interactions between selected strains of lactobacilli, bifidobacteria and colon bacteria in the presence of inulin-type fructans. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017;241:225–236. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.James K., van Sinderen D. Site-Directed Mutagenesis of Bifidobacterium Strains. Methods Mol. Biol. 2021;2278:45–60. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1274-3_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Torres-Maravilla E., Reyes-Pavón D., Benítez-Cabello A., González-Vázquez R., Ramírez-Chamorro L.M., Langella P., Bermúdez-Humarán L.G. Strategies for the Identification and Assessment of Bacterial Strains with Specific Probiotic Traits. Microorganisms. 2022;10:1389. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10071389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Liong M.T., Shah N. Bile salt deconjugation and BSH activity of five bifidobacterial strains and their cholesterol co-precipitating properties. Food Res. Int. 2005;38:135–142. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2004.08.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Öner Ö., Aslim B., Aydaş S.B. Mechanisms of cholesterol-lowering effects of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria strains as potential probiotics with their bsh gene analysis. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014;24:12–18. doi: 10.1159/000354316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kim G.B., Yi S.H., Lee B.H. Purification and Characterization of Three Different Types of Bile Salt Hydrolases from Bifidobacterium Strains. J. Dairy Sci. 2004;87:258–266. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73164-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Moubareck C., Gavini F., Vaugien L., Butel M.J., Doucet-Populaire F. Antimicrobial susceptibility of bifidobacteria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005;55:38–44. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Guadamuro L., Flórez A.B., Alegría Á., Vázquez L., Mayo B. Characterization of four β-glucosidases acting on isoflavone-glycosides from Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum IPLA 36007. Food Res. Int. 2017;100:522–528. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Di Gioia D., Strahsburger E., Lopez de Lacey A.M., Bregola V., Marotti I., Aloisio I., Biavati B., Dinelli G. Flavonoid bioconversion in Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum B7003: A potential probiotic strain for functional food development. J. Funct. Foods. 2014;7:671–679. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2013.12.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Delgado S., Flórez A.B., Mayo B. Antibiotic susceptibility of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species from the human gastrointestinal tract. Curr. Microbiol. 2005;50:202–207. doi: 10.1007/s00284-004-4431-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cizeikiene D., Jagelaviciute J. Investigation of Antibacterial Activity and Probiotic Properties of Strains Belonging to Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Genera for Their Potential Application in Functional Food and Feed Products. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins. 2021;13:1387–1403. doi: 10.1007/s12602-021-09777-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Martinez F.A., Balciunas E.M., Converti A., Cotter P.D., de Souza Oliveira R.P. Bacteriocin production by Bifidobacterium spp. A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013;31:482–488. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lahtinen S.J., Jalonen L., Ouwehand A.C., Salminen S.J. Specific Bifidobacterium strains isolated from elderly subjects inhibit growth of Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007;117:125–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Makras L., De Vuyst L. The in vitro inhibition of Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria by bifidobacteria is caused by the production of organic acids. Int. Dairy J. 2006;16:1049–1057. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.09.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ziarno M., Zaręba D. Effects of milk components and food additives on survival of three bifidobacteria strains in fermented milk under simulated gastrointestinal tract conditions. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 2015;26:27812. doi: 10.3402/mehd.v26.27812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kelly S.M., Lanigan N., O’Neill I.J., Bottacini F., Lugli G.A., Viappiani A., Turroni F., Ventura M., van Sinderen D. Bifidobacterial biofilm formation is a multifactorial adaptive phenomenon in response to bile exposure. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:11598. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68179-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pyclik M., Srutkova D., Schwarzer M., Górska S. Bifidobacteria cell wall-derived exo-polysaccharides, lipoteichoic acids, peptidoglycans, polar lipids and proteins—their chemical structure and biological attributes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020;147:333–349. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Pereira C.S., Thompson J.A., Xavier K.B. AI-2-mediated signalling in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013;37:156–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00345.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jungersen M., Wind A., Johansen E., Christensen J.E., Stuer-Lauridsen B., Eskesen D. The Science behind the Probiotic Strain Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12(®) Microorganisms. 2014;2:92–110. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms2020092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhang J., Wang S., Zeng Z., Qin Y., Li P. The complete genome sequence of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis 01 and its integral components of antioxidant defense system. 3 Biotech. 2019;9:352. doi: 10.1007/s13205-019-1890-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Shen Q., Shang N., Li P. In vitro and in vivo antioxidant activity of Bifidobacterium animalis 01 isolated from centenarians. Curr. Microbiol. 2011;62:1097–1103. doi: 10.1007/s00284-010-9827-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kim J.Y., Choi S.I., Heo T.R. Screening of antioxidative activity ofBifidobacterium species isolated from Korean infant feces and their identification. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2003;8:199–204. doi: 10.1007/BF02935897. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lin M.Y., Yen C.L. Inhibition of lipid peroxidation by Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium longum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999;47:3661–3664. doi: 10.1021/jf981235l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Inturri R., Molinaro A., Di Lorenzo F., Blandino G., Tomasello B., Hidalgo-Cantabrana C., De Castro C., Ruas-Madiedo P. Chemical and biological properties of the novel exopolysaccharide produced by a probiotic strain of Bifidobacterium longum. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017;174:1172–1180. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.07.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Westermann C., Gleinser M., Corr S.C., Riedel C.U. A Critical Evaluation of Bifidobacterial Adhesion to the Host Tissue. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:1220. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available from the NCBI in the BioProject PRJNA795522.


Articles from Microorganisms are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES