Skip to main content
Microorganisms logoLink to Microorganisms
. 2022 Nov 16;10(11):2276. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10112276

The Effect of the Gallbladder Environment during Chronic Infection on Salmonella Persister Cell Formation

Juan F González 1,2, Regan Hitt 1,2, Baileigh Laipply 1,2, John S Gunn 1,2,3,*
Editors: Paul Stoodley, Erin Gloag
PMCID: PMC9698170  PMID: 36422346

Abstract

Typhoid fever is caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi). Around 3–5% of individuals infected become chronic carriers, with the gallbladder (GB) as the predominant site of persistence. Gallstones (GS) aid in the development and maintenance of GB carriage, serving as a substrate to which Salmonellae attach and form a biofilm. This biofilm matrix protects bacteria from the host immune system and environmental stress. This shielded environment is an ideal place for the development of persister cells, a transient phenotype of a subset of cells within a population that allows survival after antibiotic treatment. Persisters can also arise in response to harsh environments such as the GB. Here we investigate if GB conditions affect the number of persisters in a Salmonella population. To simulate the chronic GB environment, we cultured biofilms in cholesterol-coated 96-well plates in the presence of ox or human bile. We then treated planktonic or biofilm Salmonella cultures with high concentrations of different antibiotics. This study suggests that biofilms provide a niche for persister cells, but GB conditions either play no role or have a negative influence on persister formation, especially after kanamycin treatment. The antibiotic target was important, as antimicrobials directed against DNA replication or the cell wall had no effect on persister cell formation. Interestingly, repeated treatment with ciprofloxacin increased the percentage of S. Typhimurium persisters in a biofilm, but this increase was abolished by GB conditions. On the other hand, repeated ciprofloxacin treatment of S. Typhi biofilms in GB conditions slightly increased the fraction of persisters. Thus, while the harsh conditions in the GB would be thought to give rise to increased persisters, therefore contributing to the development of chronic carriage, these data suggest persister cell formation is dampened in this environment.

Keywords: Salmonella, persisters, biofilm, bile, typhoid

1. Introduction

Typhoid fever is primarily caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi). Around 3–5% of individuals infected with S. Typhi become chronic carriers, with the gallbladder (GB) as the primary site of persistence. About 15% of patients with typhoid fever, who appear to be treated successfully, suffer from relapse [1]. In the case of chronic typhoid carriers, antibiotic treatment is often ineffective. Cholecystectomy significantly improves cure rates but is not always a viable option in endemic areas and does not guarantee clearance [2]. Gallstones (GS) aid in the development and maintenance of GB carriage, serving as a substrate to which Salmonellae attach and form a biofilm [3,4].

Biofilm-associated chronic infections account for more than 80% of microbial infections in the United States [5]. Aggregation in a biofilm matrix provides bacteria with a physical barrier that protects them from the host immune system and environmental stress, including antibiotics [6]. This protection, along with antibiotic resistance that arises from heritable mutations, is a reason for why these infections are notoriously hard to treat.

Persister cells are a less studied cause for the recalcitrance of biofilm-associated chronic infections. The existence of persister cells was discovered soon after antibiotics became widely used [7]. Persistence is a transient phenotype of a subset of cells within a microbial population that allows for increased survival after antibiotic treatment [8]. These cells are genetically identical to the wild-type population but, even though susceptible to antibiotics, a small fraction of these tolerant bacteria will survive antimicrobial treatment by entering a dormant state [9,10]. The regrowth of persisters gives rise to a new antibiotic-sensitive population with a similar subpopulation of tolerant cells [11]. The capacity of biofilms to shelter persister cells is suggested as a primary reason for why eliminating a chronic biofilm infection is so difficult [12]. The mechanisms for persister formation are a matter of heated debate and include toxin-antitoxin modules [13,14], intracellular ATP levels [15,16], and slow growth [17,18]. One thing is certain, persisters form stochastically but most notably arise under various stresses including not only antimicrobials, but also heat, acid, oxidative, and hyperosmotic stress [9]. The GB is a harsh environment, as bile can disrupt cellular membranes, damage DNA, and denature proteins [19,20]. Even though Salmonella has developed mechanisms to survive under these conditions [20], this environment seems to be the ideal location for persisters to arise. Because S. Typhi is a human-restricted pathogen and there are no known environmental reservoirs, in certain populations carriers are responsible for much of spread of this disease [4]. Understanding the mechanisms that allow the establishment and persistence of chronic typhoid in the GB is a critical step in the development of new therapeutic and treatment strategies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

Salmonella strains are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Strains were streaked on Luria–Bertani (LB; 21284, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) agar plates and incubated at 37 °C overnight. Single colonies were used to start overnight (O/N) liquid cultures. Planktonic cells were grown at 37 °C on a rotating drum in tryptic soy broth (TSB; 211822, BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). To simulate GB conditions, media were supplemented with two different types of bile: commercially available ox bile (OB, 195498, MP Biomedical, Santa Ana, CA, USA) and human bile (HB) from our cholecystitis patient collection. Human bile was collected under an approved Institutional Review Board protocol (2018H0104/IRB18-01226) from consenting patients undergoing elective cholicysectomy.

2.2. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration

Minimum inhibitory concentrations for our S. Typhimurium and S. Typhi strains were calculated previously [21]. For all other strains, the MIC was determined by the standard broth microdilution method from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute to evaluate the susceptibility of each strain (Supplementary Table S1) [22]. To prepare antibiotic solutions, ciprofloxacin (17850, Honeywell Fluka, Switzerland), kanamycin (J17924-14, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and ampicillin (a9518, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were independently dissolved in PBS at 1500× the MIC. Cefepime (J6623703, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was dissolved in DMSO due to its low solubility and used at a concentration of 0.2 mg/mL.

2.3. Planktonic Persister Assays

Strains were inoculated in 3 mL TSB and grown on a roller drum overnight at 37 °C. The following day, the strains were removed from the incubator and normalized to an OD600 value of 0.4 (ND-1000, Nanodrop, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), representing ~2 × 109 cells/mL. Subsequently, 100 μL of normalized solution was added to 2900 μL of LB +/− 1% bile and grown overnight, again, at 37 °C. Following overnight growth, 1 mL of each sample was moved to a new 1.75 mL centrifuge tube. Samples were spun at 5000 rpm for 5 min at room temperature. Media were removed and the pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of PBS with or without (control) antibiotic. Samples were incubated at 37 °C on a nutator for 24 h. Following this incubation with antibiotics, tubes were spun at 5000 rpm for 5 min at room temperature. Media were removed and the pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of sterile PBS. Samples were then serial diluted and drip plated on LB plates for CFU enumeration.

2.4. Biofilm Persister Assays

To prepare for biofilm assays, 96-well polystyrene plates were coated with a cholesterol (C8667-256, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) solution consisting of 5 mg/mL cholesterol dissolved in a 1:1 solution of ethanol:isopropanol (459828-1L, 34863-L, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Subsequently, 100 uL of the cholesterol solution was added to each well and allowed to evaporate overnight while nutating (88-861-041, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in a sterile biosafety cabinet. Strains were inoculated in 3 mL TSB and grown on a roller drum overnight at 37 °C. The following day, the strains were removed from the incubator and normalized to an OD600 value of 0.4 (~2 × 109 cells/mL). Following this, 198 μL of fresh TSB +/− 1% (human/ox) bile was added to the cholesterol-coated 96-well plates and 2 μL of the normalized culture was added to each well. Inoculated plates were incubated at 30 °C while nutating for 5 days. Media were carefully removed every day and 200 μL of fresh TSB +/− 1% (human/ox) bile was added. Following 5 days of growth, media were removed and wells were rinsed with 200 μL of sterile PBS. The PBS was removed and 200 μL of antibiotic solutions was added to each well, as well as PBS for the controls. The plate was incubated at 30 °C while nutating for 24 h. Following incubation with antibiotics, wells were scraped and moved to micro centrifuge tubes. Tubes were spun at 5000 rpm for 5 min at room temperature. Media were removed and the pellet was washed in 1 mL of sterile PBS. Samples were then resuspended, serial diluted, and drip plated on LB plates for enumeration.

For the multiple antibiotic exposure experiment, biofilms were prepared and treated with antibiotic (or PBS control) as described above but incubated (at 30 °C, nutating) for 3 days. Six sets of replicates for each condition were established in 96-well plates. After each round of antibiotic (or PBS control), one set of replicates was plated for CFU enumeration (as describe above). The remaining sets were incubated again in media (TSB or TSB + HB) for 3 days, and the cycle was repeated until the final set of replicates was treated with antibiotics for a total of 5 rounds (Figure 5A).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed with three or more biological replicates and repeated at least three times. Only groups with comparable treatments were statistically analyzed. Raw CFU numbers are provides in Supplementary Table S2. Total cell counts were log transformed and compared using a 2-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc testing with the statistical software GraphPad Prism version 7.4.0. Statistical significance was represented as follows: ns, not significant; *, p ≤ 0.05; **, p ≤ 0.01; ***, p ≤ 0.001; and ****, p ≤ 0.0001.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Bile in Persister Formation of Various Salmonella Populations

Salmonella can be found in the GB lumen, epithelia, and on the surface of GS [3,23]. To model planktonic cells in the lumen, we grew Salmonella strains on liquid TSB media with and without bile (control). S. Typhi and S. Typhimurium are used in all assays because both can establish chronic GB infections involving biofilms [3]. These strains were treated with antibiotics at 1500 times their MIC (Supplementary Table S1) for 24 h. For persister formation assays, we chose the antimicrobials ciprofloxacin and kanamycin. The first was selected because it is the treatment of choice as a first-line therapy for children and adults in the United States [24], the latter was chosen because it has a different cellular target than ciprofloxacin. For S. Typhimurium, there was a stark contrast between the two antibiotics used: for ciprofloxacin, the number of persisters was below 0.01% in all conditions (Table 1), while the percentage of persisters recovered after kanamycin treatment was much higher (4.61% in TSB, 1.18% in HB, 25.8% in OB). Interestingly, the number of persisters after ciprofloxacin treatment in human bile increased slightly with respect to rich media alone, but the difference was not significant (Table 1, Figure 1). S. Typhi displayed a considerably higher percentage of persisters in ciprofloxacin than S. Typhimurium in TSB (0.12%), TSB + HB (0.07%), and TSB + OB (0.12%). Kanamycin had a comparatively negative effect on the number of S. Typhi persisters recovered, as the percentage was much lower than S. Typhimurium in all conditions (TSB, 0.69; TSB + HB, 0.02%; TSB + OB, 0.06%). Notably, both types of bile were significantly detrimental to persister formation after kanamycin treatment in S. Typhi (HB, p < 0.0001; OB, p = 0.0011).

Table 1.

Percentage of persister cells recovered after anti-microbial treatment in different growth conditions.

% In Planktonic % In Biofilm
Organism Media Ciprofloxacin Kanamycin Ciprofloxacin Kanamycin
S. Typhimurium Control 3.07 × 10−4 4.61 4.89 13.73
HB 0.01 1.18 0.04 0.08
OB 6.67 × 10−4 25.78 21.55 6.70
S. Typhi Control 0.12 0.69 12.16 4.12
HB 0.07 0.02 0.52 0.20
OB 0.12 0.06 1.67 0.08

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Persister cells recovered in S. Typhimurium 14028 and S. Typhi Ty2 laboratory strains after treatment with ciprofloxacin (red circles) or kanamycin (blue circles) in planktonic cells growing in ox bile (OB) or human bile (HB) versus total cells (strains not treated with antibiotics are represented by black circles). Representative charts are shown from one experiment performed with four or more biological replicates and repeated at least three times with similar results. A one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test were used to compare the different conditions (**, p ≤ 0.01; ****, p ≤ 0.0001).

To model biofilms on GS, we grew Salmonella on cholesterol-coated 96-well plates. Biofilms were grown for five days and treated with an antibiotic for 24 hrs. Overall, the proportion of persisters was remarkably higher when compared to planktonic growth (Table 1). For S. Typhimurium, no significant differences were found in the number of persister cells formed in either ciprofloxacin or kanamycin in ox bile (Figure 2A). Remarkably, the type of bile influences persister formation, as there were significantly fewer persisters after kanamycin treatment in human bile but not ox bile (Figure 2A,B; p < 0.0001,). S. Typhi behaved similarly to S. Typhimurium, with no differences in the proportion of persisters after ciprofloxacin treatment in either type of bile, but exhibited a difference in the number of persisters versus S. Typhimurium after kanamycin treatment (Figure 2; ox bile p = 0.0127, human bile p = 0.0042). Analogously to the planktonic results, for biofilms on cholesterol-coated surfaces, the combination of human bile and kanamycin is detrimental to persister formation in S. Typhi, with persister cells below detection limits in certain experimental sets. In summary, as expected, biofilms are a reservoir for persister formation but, contrary to our hypothesis, GB/GS conditions had little or no effect on the number of persisters recovered after ciprofloxacin treatment in either planktonic or biofilm populations. GB/GS conditions also had an overall negative effect on persister formation after kanamycin treatment, especially in S. Typhi.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Persister cells recovered in S. Typhimurium 14028 and S. Typhi Ty2 laboratory strains after treatment with ciprofloxacin (red circles) or kanamycin (blue circles) in biofilms growing in ox bile (A) or human bile (B) versus total cells (strains not treated with antibiotics are represented by black circles). Representative charts are shown from one experiment performed with four or more biological replicates and repeated at least three times with similar results. A one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test were used to compare the different conditions (ns, not significant).

3.2. Human Bile Has a Varied Effect on the Amount of Persister Cells Found after Ciprofloxacin or Kanamycin Treatment in Biofilms of S. Typhi Clinical Isolates

S. Typhi clinical isolates from our collection were also tested for their ability to form persister cells in human bile. In general, these isolates showed a great variability in persister formation compared to our laboratory strain Ty2, and also had lower cell numbers in the control conditions (no antibiotics, Figure 3). Two isolates showed no difference in any conditions (JSG3074 and JSG3400). Unlike the lab strains that grew equally well in the TSB and TSB + human bile controls, three clinical isolates showed a significant decrease in cell numbers when grown in TSB + human bile (JSG3441, JSG3979, and JSG 3981). For this reason, even though isolate JSG3979 showed a decrease in persister numbers after ciprofloxacin treatment, it probably reflects the lower number of bacterial cells in general found in human bile vs. the control, rather than an actual decrease in persister formation. Similar to the lab strain when grown in human bile, four of the six clinical isolates showed a greatly decreased number of persister cells after kanamycin treatment (JSG3076, JSG3441, JSG3979, and JSG3981). Very few persister cells were recovered after kanamycin treatment in two strains (JSG3074 and JSG3400) both with or without human bile. Overall, the clinical isolates behaved similarly to the laboratory strains in GS conditions. Ciprofloxacin had no effect and kanamycin a mostly negative one, although there was considerable variability between isolates.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Persister cells recovered in S. Typhi clinical strains after treatment with ciprofloxacin (red circles) or kanamycin (blue circles) in biofilms on human bile versus total cells (strains not treated with antibiotics are represented by black circles). Representative charts are shown from one experiment performed with four or more biological replicates and repeated at least three times with similar results. A one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test were used to compare the different conditions (ns, not significant; *, p ≤ 0.05; **, p ≤ 0.01; ***, p ≤ 0.001; ****, p ≤ 0.0001).

3.3. The Cellular Target of an Antibiotic Influences the Amount of Persisters

Since we observed significantly different results between ciprofloxacin and kanamycin, we speculated that the antibiotic target could influence the amount of persisters recovered. Kanamycin inhibits protein synthesis and ciprofloxacin targets DNA replication. We decided to test ampicillin and cefepime, two antibiotics that target the cell wall. As can be observed in Figure 4, neither of these antibiotics affected persister formation in S. Typhimurium or S. Typhi when compared to the untreated control, except for a slight increase in the number of persisters recovered after ampicillin treatment in S. Typhimurium. These results confirm that the antibiotic target has a strong effect on the levels of persister formation.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Persister cells recovered in S. Typhimurium 14028 and S. Typhi Ty2 laboratory strains after treatment with ampicillin (purple circles) or cefepime (orange circles) in biofilms growing in human bile (HB) versus total cells (strains not treated with antibiotics are represented by black circles). Representative charts are shown from one experiment performed with four or more biological replicates and repeated at least three times with similar results. A one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test were used to compare the different conditions (ns, not significant; *, p ≤ 0.05).

3.4. Multiple Rounds of Ciprofloxacin Treatment in GS Conditions affects S. Typhimurium and S. Typhi Differently

To model the conditions that a Salmonella biofilm in the GB of a hypothetical typhoid carrier might experience with multiple antibiotic treatments over time, we set up a simple in vitro system using ciprofloxacin, the most widely used antibiotic for typhoid infections [25,26,27]. Salmonella biofilms grown in rich media or media plus human bile were exposed to multiple rounds of antibiotic, with a recovery time in the original growth conditions in between treatments (Figure 5A). The results are summarized in Figure 5B. S. Typhimurium biofilms reached peak cell numbers at round 3, which was followed by a slow decrease. Interestingly, while the total number of cells decreases over the rounds of exposure, the fraction of persisters recovered in the control (TSB) after ciprofloxacin treatment increased from 6.47% at round 1 to 57.74% at the last round. The presence of human bile had the opposite effect, as persister numbers went from 8.61 to 3.82%. For S. Typhi, the number of cells were steady for the first three rounds then decreased in rounds 4 and 5. Round 2 was the only time point where there was a significant difference between the number of persister cells in the different growth conditions (p = 0.04). The percentage of persisters in the control went down from 1.36% in the first round to 0.10% in the last, while human bile increased the proportion of persisters slightly from 2.34% to 3.13%. In summary, the above experiments in S. Typhimurium confirm previous findings that show repeated antibiotic treatment increases the proportions of persisters in a population, but GS conditions abolished this trend. For S. Typhi, the opposite was true, as GS conditions modestly increased the fraction of persisters.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Multiple rounds of ciprofloxacin treatment on biofilms. (A) Experimental set-up; growth, treatment, and CFU counts for rounds 2–5 were performed the same as for round 1. (B) Colony forming units recovered for S. Typhimurium 14028 and S. Typhi Ty2 laboratory strains in different growth conditions after every round of ciprofloxacin treatment (red symbols) vs. control total cell numbers (black and green symbols). Representative charts are shown from one experiment performed with four or more biological replicates and repeated at least three times with similar results.

4. Discussion

The number of persisters recovered after ciprofloxacin treatment in rich media in this study (Figure 1) was in accordance with the majority of published planktonic Salmonella studies [17] but lower than others [28,29], possibly due to the high concentration of anti-microbial used here (1500× MIC). As stated above, it is believed that one of the main reasons chronic biofilm infections are so recalcitrant is because biofilms can provide protection to persister cells [12]. In general, our results indicate that this is true for both S. Typhimurium and S. Typhi (Figure 1 and Figure 2, Table 1). This was especially marked for S. Typhimurium after ciprofloxacin treatment, where the difference in the proportion of persisters was several logs (Table 1). Remarkably, this was not true in human bile, where the proportion of persisters in planktonic and biofilm populations were almost identical (0.01 vs. 0.04%, Table 1). This is in agreement with previous studies where Salmonella biofilms showed a higher level of persistence than planktonic cultures [28]. In this respect, Salmonella seems to behave differently to other important pathogens, such as P. aeruginosa and S. aureus that show similar levels of persister cells in biofilm and planktonic cultures in the stationary phase [30,31].

A high variability in the levels of persistence has been widely documented [32,33]. A recent review article combined persister data from different studies on natural isolates of E. coli and found that persister levels in different antibiotic classes could vary from 0.00001% to 98% [33]. This variability was observed in our experiments using S. Typhi clinical isolates (Figure 3). The clinical isolates exhibited different responses to growth conditions and antibiotic treatments, with the fraction of persisters varying from strain to strain. The clinical isolates, similar to the lab strain, show high levels of persisters after ciprofloxacin treatment when grown as a biofilm. Additionally, all clinical strains show a high sensitivity to kanamycin. In concordance with our work, a recent study also found high heterogeneity in the level of persisters found after ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin treatment in planktonic and biofilm cultures of different S. enterica serovars [28]. Further, treatment with antibiotics such as cefotaxime, azithromycin, and ciprofloxacin has been shown to select for mutations detrimental to biofilm formation [34], which could partly explain the high variability in biofilm formation and persistence seen in our clinical isolates. It is important to note that given our limited number of clinical isolates it is not possible to draw broad conclusions.

One of the most interesting findings in our study was the decrease in persister cells in S. Typhi when treated with kanamycin and grown in bile. This phenomenon was also observed in S. Typhimurium, but only in biofilms grown in the presence of human bile (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). Since this behavior was observed with kanamycin, which targets protein synthesis, but not with ciprofloxacin, which targets DNA replication, we hypothesized that the target of the antibiotic plays an important role in this reduction in persister cells. To further investigate, we decided to test ampicillin and cefepime, antibiotics that target the cell wall. As can be observed in Figure 4, these antibiotics do not induce a decrease in persister cells formation, as both Salmonella species are highly tolerant to these antibiotics, with only S. Typhimurium showing a slight increase in persister formation after ampicillin treatment in human bile. Antibiotics that target cell-wall biosynthetic enzymes are not very effective against slow or non-growing cells [35] such as those found in biofilms. Additionally, these antibiotics can enrich these slow or non-growing cells [36]. The reduction in persister cells in kanamycin could be a result of the arrest of protein synthesis involving protein aggregosomes, which has been reported to facilitate bacterial cell dormancy in E. coli. These aggregates were significantly diminished after treatment with the protein synthesis-blocking antibiotic chloramphenicol [37]. Alternatively, Salmonella persister cells could require a protein to survive in bile, and treatment with kanamycin could block the synthesis of this protein, making dormant cells vulnerable to bile. For example, S. Typhimurium persisters are known to be capable of remaining metabolically active, even in their dormant state. In macrophages, persisters are induced under the acidic conditions of the intracellular vacuole [38] and can reprogram host macrophages in vivo using their partially active effector delivery system [39]. This delivery system would be inactive if protein synthesis was blocked.

It has been reported that periodic and repetitive treatment of patients with antimicrobials commonly leads to hyperpersistance, where mutations that favor persistence are accumulated [40,41,42,43]. Furthermore, bacterial persistence has been shown to adjust rapidly to antimicrobial treatment frequencies, driving swift evolutionary adaptation [44]. In order to simulate a hypothetical condition where a chronic typhoid patient would receive several rounds of ciprofloxacin treatment, we set up an in vitro experiment where Salmonella biofilms were grown in conditions where bile was replenished, as it is in the GB [45], and then allowed to grow for a period of time before treatment with ciprofloxacin, with this cycle repeating five times. The results, summarized in Figure 5, indicate that there is a steady decline in total cell numbers after the continued rounds of antibiotic treatment in GB conditions. This was not expected but perhaps not surprising, as the continued onslaught of fresh bile plus antibiotic is a very challenging treatment. As the literature reports [40,41,42,43], the percentage of persisters in rich media (control) increased dramatically for S. Typhimurium, from 6.47 to 57.74%. Unexpectedly, bile had the opposite effect, reducing the percentage of persisters from 8.61 to 3.82%. S. Typhi displayed a more modest but opposite response; in the control conditions, persisters decreased from 1.36 to 0.1% but presented a modest increase from 2.34 to 3.13% in GS conditions. This could possibly reflect the evolutionary process that S. Typhi has undergone as a human pathogen, using the GB and GS as a niche for persistence.

5. Conclusions

As expected, biofilms provided a niche for persister formation; however, contrary to our hypothesis, the adverse conditions of the GB did not “prime” Salmonella populations for increased persister cell formation, but rather were detrimental to persisters. However, this phenomenon does not seem to be universal and can vary between serovars, strains, and antibiotic families. More work will be required to understand the complex dynamics between planktonic and biofilm communities in the GB and their potential for persister cell development. We cannot rule out that the activity of a yet unidentified factor that contributes to persister cell survival in bile is rendered ineffective by kanamycin treatment. Additionally, it is possible that the slight but detectable increase in persister cell percentages under repeated ciprofloxacin treatments in GS conditions for S. Typhi could become significantly larger with additional rounds of antibiotic treatment. Understanding these complex mechanisms will bring us closer to the goal of eradicating typhoid fever.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10112276/s1, Table S1: Strains used in this study; Table S2: Raw CFU data.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: J.F.G. and J.S.G.; Data curation: J.S.G., R.H. and B.L.; Formal analysis: J.F.G.; Funding acquisition: J.S.G.; Investigation: J.F.G., R.H. and B.L.; Methodology: J.F.G., R.H. and J.S.G.; Resources: J.S.G.; Software: J.F.G.; Supervision: J.S.G.; Writing—review and editing: J.F.G. and J.S.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

Data can be found at: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/kbtcdlm7x3sgk44/AADeI1biI20ROtPbSr05dLg0a?dl=0.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by grants R01AI116917 and R01AI099525 from the National Institutes of Health (J.S.G.) and from funds from the Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital (J.S.G.).

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Chambers H., McPhee S., Papadakis M., Tierney L. Current Medical Diagnosis and Treatment. McGraw-Hill Medical; New York, NY, USA: 2008. [(accessed on 25 August 2021)]. Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Current%20Medical%20Diagnosis%20and%20Treatment&author=H.F.%20Chambers&publication_year=2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ristori C., Rodríguez H., Vicent P., Ferreccio C., García J., Lobos H., D’Ottone K. Persistence of the Salmonella typhi-paratyphi carrier state after gallbladder removal. Bull. Pan Am. Health Organ. 1982;16:361–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Crawford R.W., Rosales-Reyes R., Ramirez-Aguilar M.d.l.L., Chapa-Azuela O., Alpuche-Aranda C., Gunn J.S. Gallstones play a significant role in Salmonella spp. gallbladder colonization and carriage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:4353–4358. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000862107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gonzalez-Escobedo G., Marshall J., Gunn J.S. Chronic and acute infection of the gall bladder by Salmonella Typhi: Understanding the carrier state. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011;9:9–14. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Davies D. Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2003;2:114–122. doi: 10.1038/nrd1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hall-Stoodley L., Costerton J.W., Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: From the Natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004;2:95–108. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bigger J.W. Treatment of staphylococcal infections with penicillin by intermittent sterilisation. Lancet. 1944;244:497–500. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)74210-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wood T.K., Knabel S.J., Kwan B.W. Bacterial Persister Cell Formation and Dormancy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013;79:7116–7121. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02636-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wilmaerts D., Windels E., Verstraeten N., Michiels J. General Mechanisms Leading to Persister Formation and Awakening. Trends Genet. 2019;35:401–411. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2019.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Helaine S., Kugelberg E. Bacterial persisters: Formation, eradication, and experimental systems. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22:417–424. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cohen N.R., Lobritz M.A., Collins J.J. Microbial Persistence and the Road to Drug Resistance. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;13:632–642. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lewis K. Persister cells and the riddle of biofilm survival. Biochemistry. 2005;70:267–274. doi: 10.1007/s10541-005-0111-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Moyed H.S., Bertrand K.P. hipA, a newly recognized gene of Escherichia coli K-12 that affects frequency of persistence after inhibition of murein synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 1983;155:768–775. doi: 10.1128/jb.155.2.768-775.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moyed H.S., Broderick S.H. Molecular cloning and expression of hipA, a gene of Escherichia coli K-12 that affects frequency of persistence after inhibition of murein synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 1986;166:399–403. doi: 10.1128/jb.166.2.399-403.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Conlon B.P., Rowe S.E., Gandt A.B., Nuxoll A.S., Donegan N.P., Zalis E.A., Clair G., Adkins J.N., Cheung A.L., Lewis K. Persister formation in Staphylococcus aureus is associated with ATP depletion. Nat. Microbiol. 2016;1:16051. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shan Y., Gandt A.B., Rowe S.E., Deisinger J.P., Conlon B.P., Lewis K. ATP-Dependent Persister Formation in Escherichia coli. mBio. 2017;8:e02267-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02267-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pontes M.H., Groisman E.A. Slow growth determines nonheritable antibiotic resistance in Salmonella enterica. Sci. Signal. 2019;12:eaax3938. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aax3938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pontes M.H., Groisman E.A. A Physiological Basis for Nonheritable Antibiotic Resistance. mBio. 2020;11:e00817-2. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00817-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Begley M., Gahan C.G., Hill C. The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005;29:625–651. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hernández S.B., Cota I., Ducret A., Aussel L., Casadesús J. Adaptation and Preadaptation of Salmonella enterica to Bile. PLOS Genet. 2012;8:e1002459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.González J.F., Alberts H., Lee J., Doolittle L., Gunn J.S. Biofilm Formation Protects Salmonella from the Antibiotic Ciprofloxacin In Vitro and In Vivo in the Mouse Model of chronic Carriage. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:222. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18516-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Melvin P., Weinstein M. Dilution AST for Aerobically Grown Bacteria—CLSI. 11th ed. CLSI; Wayne, PA, USA: 2018. [(accessed on 10 August 2021)]. Available online: https://clsi.org/standards/products/microbiology/documents/m07/ [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gonzalez-Escobedo G., Gunn J.S. Gallbladder Epithelium as a Niche for Chronic Salmonella Carriage. Infect. Immun. 2013;81:2920–2930. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00258-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Effa E.E., Lassi Z.S., Critchley J.A., Garner P., Sinclair D., Olliaro P.L., Bhutta Z.A. Fluoroquinolones for treating typhoid and paratyphoid fever (enteric fever) Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2011;2011:CD004530. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004530.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Thaver D., Zaidi A.K.M., Critchley J., Azmatullah A., Madni S.A., Bhutta Z.A. A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: Meta-analysis. BMJ. 2009;338:b1865. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schiøler H., Christiansen E.D., Høybye G., Rasmussen S.N., Greibe J. The Danish Salca-Group Biliary Calculi in Chronic Salmonella Carriers and Healthy Controls: A Controlled Study. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 1983;15:17–19. doi: 10.3109/inf.1983.15.issue-1.04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dinbar A., Altmann G., Tulcinsky D. The treatment of chronic biliary Salmonella carriers. Am. J. Med. 1969;47:236–242. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(69)90149-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Drescher S.P.M., Gallo S.W., Ferreira P.M.A., Ferreira C.A.S., De Oliveira S.D. Salmonella enterica persister cells form unstable small colony variants after in vitro exposure to ciprofloxacin. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:7232. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43631-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Narimisa N., Amraei F., Kalani B.S., Jazi F.M. Evaluation of gene expression and protein structural modeling involved in persister cell formation in Salmonella Typhimurium. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2020;52:207–217. doi: 10.1007/s42770-020-00388-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Spoering A.L., Lewis K. Biofilms and Planktonic Cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Have Similar Resistance to Killing by Antimicrobials. J. Bacteriol. 2001;183:6746–6751. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.23.6746-6751.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Waters E.M., Rowe S.E., O’Gara J.P., Conlon B.P. Convergence of Staphylococcus aureus Persister and Biofilm Research: Can Biofilms Be Defined as Communities of Adherent Persister Cells? PLOS Pathog. 2016;12:e1006012. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Balaban N.Q., Helaine S., Lewis K., Ackermann M., Aldridge B., Andersson D.I., Brynildsen M.P., Bumann D., Camilli A., Collins J.J., et al. Definitions and guidelines for research on antibiotic persistence. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2019;17:441–448. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0196-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Verstraete L., Bergh B.V.D., Verstraeten N., Michiels J. Ecology and evolution of antibiotic persistence. Trends Microbiol. 2021;30:466–479. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2021.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Trampari E., Holden E.R., Wickham G.J., Ravi A., Martins L.D.O., Savva G.M., Webber M.A. Exposure of Salmonella biofilms to antibiotic concentrations rapidly selects resistance with collateral tradeoffs. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2021;7:3. doi: 10.1038/s41522-020-00178-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yan J., Bassler B.L. Surviving as a Community: Antibiotic Tolerance and Persistence in Bacterial Biofilms. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;26:15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ronneau S., Hill P.W., Helaine S. Antibiotic persistence and tolerance: Not just one and the same. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2021;64:76–81. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2021.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pu Y., Li Y., Jin X., Tian T., Ma Q., Zhao Z., Lin S.-Y., Chen Z., Li B., Yao G., et al. ATP-Dependent Dynamic Protein Aggregation Regulates Bacterial Dormancy Depth Critical for Antibiotic Tolerance. Mol. Cell. 2019;73:143–156. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Helaine S., Cheverton A.M., Watson K.G., Faure L.M., Matthews S.A., Holden D.W. Internalization of Salmonella by Macrophages Induces Formation of Nonreplicating Persisters. Science. 2014;343:204–208. doi: 10.1126/science.1244705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stapels D.A.C., Hill P.W.S., Westermann A.J., Fisher R.A., Thurston T.L., Saliba A.-E., Blommestein I., Vogel J., Helaine S. Salmonella persisters undermine host immune defenses during antibiotic treatment. Science. 2018;362:1156–1160. doi: 10.1126/science.aat7148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hill P.W., Moldoveanu A.L., Sargen M., Ronneau S., Glegola-Madejska I., Beetham C., Fisher R.A., Helaine S. The vulnerable versatility of Salmonella antibiotic persisters during infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29:1757–1773. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bartell J.A., Cameron D.R., Mojsoska B., Haagensen J.A.J., Pressler T., Sommer L.M., Lewis K., Molin S., Johansen H.K. Bacterial persisters in long-term infection: Emergence and fitness in a complex host environment. PLOS Pathog. 2020;16:e1009112. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.LaFleur M.D., Qi Q., Lewis K. Patients with Long-Term Oral Carriage Harbor High-Persister Mutants of Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010;54:39–44. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00860-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mulcahy L.R., Burns J.L., Lory S., Lewis K. Emergence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Producing High Levels of Persister Cells in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis. J. Bacteriol. 2010;192:6191–6199. doi: 10.1128/JB.01651-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Van den Bergh B., Michiels J.E., Wenseleers T., Windels E.M., Boer P.V., Kestemont D., De Meester L., Verstrepen K.J., Verstraeten N., Fauvart M., et al. Frequency of antibiotic application drives rapid evolutionary adaptation of Escherichia coli persistence. Nat. Microbiol. 2016;1:16020. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Said H.M., editor. Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract. 6th ed. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2018. Front Matter; pp. i–ii. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Data can be found at: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/kbtcdlm7x3sgk44/AADeI1biI20ROtPbSr05dLg0a?dl=0.


Articles from Microorganisms are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES