Short abstract
Content available: Audio Recording
Listen to an audio presentation of this article.
INTRODUCTION
Sarcopenia and frailty are highly prevalent among patients with cirrhosis. 1 , 2 They are associated with several adverse outcomes, including higher (re)hospitalization rates and higher wait‐list and posttransplant mortality among those undergoing liver transplantation (LT). 1 , 3 , 4 Patients with cirrhosis often have significant exercise intolerance, and they may spend up to 95% of a 24‐hour period in a sedentary state. 5 Exercise training is known to improve muscle mass, strength, functional mobility, and quality of life in this population, combating deleterious effects of sarcopenia. 3 , 6 , 7 Early forms of telehealth have previously been explored for patients with cirrhosis to help improve disease outcomes. 8 , 9 Recently, multiple studies have investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of digital interventions to promote sustainable lifestyle changes for patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
General descriptions of included studies on digital interventions on physical activity.
| First author (Publication year) | Aim of study | No. of participants | Intervention | Outcome | Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duarte‐Rojo (2021) 10 | To determine the feasibility of end‐stage liver disease LT candidates using the EL‐FIT app and their interaction with app features | 28 | Use of EL‐FIT smartphone application in facilitating exercise in patients with end‐stage liver disease, as well as monitoring of daily steps, heart rate, sleep time | Variable app usability among participants, and 35% of participants had significant increase in physical performance | Small sample size, selection bias, and lack of control group |
| Lin (2021) 12 | To determine the effect of novel prehabilitation strategy (home‐based exercise prescription) on changes in frailty metrics and survival | 517 | Home‐based exercise prescription based on deficits identified during baseline physical therapy evaluation, including aerobic and weight‐based exercise | A median improvement of 0.3 in liver frailty index was correlated to improved survival | Selection bias, possibility of immortal time bias, varying time interval between in‐person physical therapy visits |
| Chen (2020) 3 | To assess the benefits of home‐based physical activity program in patients with cirrhosis | 17 | Personal activity tracker to monitor daily activities, 12 g/day of essential amino acid supplement and biweekly counseling sessions for 12 weeks | Improvement in the 6MWT and psoas muscle index in the intervention group |
Small sample size, selection bias, loss of interest in participants after being randomized to control group |
| Kruger (2018) 14 | To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 8 weeks of home‐based exercise training on peak aerobic power, 6‐minute walk distance, muscle mass, and quality of life in cirrhosis | 40 | 8 weeks of home‐ based exercise training, including moderate‐ to high‐intensity cycling exercise, 3 days/week | Increases seen in peak aerobic power and 6‐minute walk distance in adherent group (defined as completing ≥80% of sessions) | Due to limitation in inclusion criteria, study results are limited in generalizability to compensated cirrhosis patients, small sample size, potential confounding effect with use of beta‐blockers in selected patients |
DIGITAL DISRUPTION OF FRAILTY IN CIRRHOSIS
Duarte‐Rojo and colleagues 10 used a smartphone application, “EL‐FIT” (Exercise and Liver FITness), designed specifically for patients with cirrhosis for the purpose of exercise training at home while using a paired personal activity tracker. This program was developed by LT clinicians with consideration of physical and cognitive constraints of advanced cirrhosis. The application encompasses a variety of features, including educational videos, a profile page displaying their activities, and a community feed page that allows members to share their achievements. 10 Their study showed that 35% of the participants had notable increases in their physical performance with significant improvement in the number of steps taken in their most sedentary/inactive group. 10 Smartphones and wearable devices have become nearly ubiquitous, and these devices are equipped with multiple sensors that can be leveraged to accurately track activity and to capture one's functional status. 11
Lin and colleagues 12 investigated the role of home‐based prehabilitation exercise prescription among patients undergoing LT evaluation. Exercise prescription was 150 min/week based on deficits identified at baseline. These included seating and standing exercises, as well as weights, bands, pedal exerciser, and bikes. They found that median reduction of ≥0.3 in liver frailty index was associated with survival advantage. 12
In a separate study, participants received a personal activity tracker and nutritional supplements as part of a home‐based physical activity program. 3 The program consists of biweekly counseling sessions on exercise goals, such as (1) the need for exercise 30 min/day for 5 days/week, (2) examples of both aerobic and resistance training, and (3) instructions on how to maximize exercise safety. Total protein intake of 1.2–1.5 g/kg/day was recommended along with a provided drink supplement containing 12 g of essential amino acids. At the end of the study period, participants had improved 6‐minute walk test performance (6MWT), as well as improvement in psoas muscle index. 3 In addition to the physical benefits, Stine and colleagues 13 recently reported decreased thrombotic risk in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis who engaged in moderate‐intensity exercise, irrespective of weight loss and dietary changes.
Finally, Kruger and colleagues 14 examined the effects of an 8‐week home‐based aerobic fitness program as informed by peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2 in L/min), a parameter reported to have an independent association to the severity of hepatic dysfunction. Although there was no significant increase in peak aerobic power (L/min), there was a significant increase in aerobic endurance measured by 6MWT and a significant increase in thigh muscle thickness among the intervention group. 14
DIGITAL SOLUTIONS FOR MALNUTRITION IN CIRRHOSIS
Maintenance of well‐balanced nutrition is paramount among patients with CLD. The prevalence of malnutrition among patients with cirrhosis is 40%–90% and is associated with increased risk for posttransplant sepsis, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and mortality. Global Liver Institute, an advocacy group for patients with CLD and their families, recently announced the launch of a personalized nutrition application. The app allows for personalized meal plans to meet the unique nutritional guidelines set by the Global Liver Institute advisors for patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (https://www.globalliver.org/news/2021/06/global‐liver‐institute‐nutristyle‐announce‐personalized‐nutrition‐app‐for‐liver‐health). However, there remains a significant gap in digital technology that allows for individually targeted macronutrient analysis, including tracking of calories and protein intake among patients with CLD.
DISCUSSION
Studies investigating the role of digital interventions in the care of patients with CLD show they are only in their infancy compared with advances already seen in other chronic diseases. Telerehabilitation includes exercises for which intensity and duration can be monitored with technology (“telemonitoring”) with a focus on improving exercise‐related outcomes. 15 In the cardiovascular literature, numerous studies exist on the use of telerehabilitation in frail patients with a variety of tools, including smartphone apps, smartwatches, and wearable sensors. 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 Recent literature review by Cruz and colleagues 21 failed to identify any studies investigating the role of digital interventions in nutritional management in CLD as compared with studies in chronic kidney disease (n = 6), cancer (n = 6), and cardiovascular disease (n = 3).
One of the potential challenges in the CLD population may be acceptance and adequate access to technology (Figure 1). Louissaint and colleagues 22 examined technology acceptance in a select group of patients with cirrhosis using a modified technology acceptance model survey. Their study found that patients were more interested in the use of hypothetical health applications when there was the presence of a caregiver, history of decompensation, ascites, or use of cirrhosis‐related medication. In addition, greater potential acceptance was associated with higher perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and less computer anxiety. 22
FIGURE 1.

Components that lead to successful utilization of digital interventions.
Another potential challenge includes loss of interest secondary to the “novelty effect” in which there is only brief and nonsustained engagement by participants in response to innovative technology. 10 In addition, patient “adherence,” which reflects patients' observance to medical, physical, and dietary recommendations provided by the care team, requires timely and in‐depth discussions to yield shared understanding of the benefits of interventions. 12 Despite these challenges, it should be emphasized that home‐based programs have many advantages, including cost‐effectiveness, accessibility, and flexibility. 14 Further studies are needed to establish the impact of digital interventions to prevent and combat frailty and malnutrition in patients with cirrhosis, and to identify methods to increase patient engagement in a sustainable and equitable manner.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Nothing to report.
Choi C, Simonetto DA. Digital interventions in the management of advanced liver disease: Prescription and monitoring of healthy living in homes. Clin Liver Dis. 2022;20:162–165. 10.1002/cld.1253
REFERENCES
- 1. Carey EJ, Lai JC, Wang CW, Dasarathy S, Lobach I, Montano‐Loza AJ, et al. A multicenter study to define sarcopenia in patients with end‐stage liver disease. Liver Transpl. 2017;23:625–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Duong N, Sadowski B, Rangnekar AS. The impact of frailty, sarcopenia, and malnutrition on liver transplant outcomes. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2021;17:271–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Chen HW, Ferrando A, White MG, Dennis RA, Xie J, Pauly M, et al. Home‐based physical activity and diet intervention to improve physical function in advanced liver disease: a randomized pilot trial. Dig Dis Sci. 2020;65:3350–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Duarte‐Rojo A, Ruiz‐Margain A, Montano‐Loza AJ, Macias‐Rodriguez RU, Ferrando A, Kim WR. Exercise and physical activity for patients with end‐stage liver disease: improving functional status and sarcopenia while on the transplant waiting list. Liver Transpl. 2018;24:122–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Dunn MA, Kappus MR, Bloomer PM, Duarte‐Rojo A, Josbeno DA, Jakicic JM. Wearables, physical activity, and exercise testing in liver disease. Semin Liver Dis. 2021;41:128–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Thompson PD, Arena R, Riebe D, Pescatello LS. ACSM's new preparticipation health screening recommendations from ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, ninth edition. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2013;12:215–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Williams FR, Vallance A, Faulkner T, Towey J, Durman S, Kyte D, et al. Home‐based exercise in patients awaiting liver transplantation: a feasibility study. Liver Transpl. 2019;25:995–1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ganapathy D, Acharya C, Lachar J, Patidar K, Sterling RK, White MB, et al. The patient buddy app can potentially prevent hepatic encephalopathy‐related readmissions. Liver Int. 2017;37:1843–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Thomson M, Volk M, Kim HM, Piette JD. An automated telephone monitoring system to identify patients with cirrhosis at risk of re‐hospitalization. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:3563–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Duarte‐Rojo A, Bloomer PM, Rogers RJ, Hassan MA, Dunn MA, Tevar AD, et al. Introducing EL‐FIT (Exercise and Liver FITness): a smartphone app to prehabilitate and monitor liver transplant candidates. Liver Transpl. 2021;27:502–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Straczkiewicz M, James P, Onnela JP. A systematic review of smartphone‐based human activity recognition methods for health research. NPJ Digit Med. 2021;4:148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Lin FP, Visina JM, Bloomer PM, Dunn MA, Josbeno DA, Zhang X, et al. Prehabilitation‐driven changes in frailty metrics predict mortality in patients with advanced liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116:2105–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Stine JG, Schreibman IR, Faust AJ, Dahmus J, Stern B, Soriano C, et al. NASHFit: a randomized controlled trial of an exercise training program to reduce clotting risk in patients with NASH. Hepatology. 2022;76:172–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kruger C, McNeely ML, Bailey RJ, Yavari M, Abraldes JG, Carbonneau M, et al. Home exercise training improves exercise capacity in cirrhosis patients: role of exercise adherence. Sci Rep. 2018;8:99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Chan C, Yamabayashi C, Syed N, Kirkham A, Camp PG. Exercise telemonitoring and telerehabilitation compared with traditional cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Physiother Can. 2016;68:242–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Frederix I, Vanhees L, Dendale P, Goetschalckx K. A review of telerehabilitation for cardiac patients. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21:45–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kitzman DW, Whellan DJ, Duncan P, Pastva AM, Mentz RJ, Reeves GR, et al. Physical rehabilitation for older patients hospitalized for heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:203–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Rivers JT, Smith C, Smith I, Cameron J. The impact of a mobile app on participation in cardiac rehabilitation and understanding barriers to success: comparative cohort study. JMIR Cardio. 2022;6:e24174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Snoek JA, Prescott EI, van der Velde AE, Eijsvogels TMH, Mikkelsen N, Prins LF, et al. Effectiveness of home‐based mobile guided cardiac rehabilitation as alternative strategy for nonparticipation in clinic‐based cardiac rehabilitation among elderly patients in Europe: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6:463–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Mach M, Watzal V, Hasan W, Andreas M, Winkler B, Weiss G, et al. Fitness‐tracker assisted frailty‐assessment before transcatheter aortic valve implantation: proof‐of‐concept study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8:e19227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Cruz C, Prado CM, Punja S, Tandon P. Use of digital technologies in the nutritional management of catabolism‐prone chronic diseases: a rapid review. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021;46:152–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Louissaint J, Lok AS, Fortune BE, Tapper EB. Acceptance and use of a smartphone application in cirrhosis. Liver Int. 2020;40:1556–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
