Skip to main content
The Egyptian Heart Journal logoLink to The Egyptian Heart Journal
. 2022 Nov 25;74:81. doi: 10.1186/s43044-022-00319-0

Ventricular and atrial function assessment with transthoracic echocardiography in patients with rheumatic inflammatory disease

Somayyeh Norouzi 1,#, Amirmohammad Khalaji 2,#, Mansoor Namazi 3, Somaye Sadat Rezaei 4, Amir Hossein Behnoush 2, Maryam Masoumi 5,
PMCID: PMC9700529  PMID: 36434413

Abstract

Background

Inflammatory rheumatic diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and systemic sclerosis (SSc), can cause cardiovascular complications in many cases. This study aimed to compare the ventricular and atrial functions of the heart between rheumatic patients and healthy controls using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).

Results

The study was performed between 64 patients with mentioned rheumatic diseases and 64 age- and sex-matched healthy controls who all underwent detailed history-taking and TTE. Echocardiographic parameters were measured and compared between the two groups. TTE showed significant differences in many echocardiographic parameters. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left ventricular end-systolic diameter, right atrium area, inferior vena cava diameter, and systolic pulmonary artery pressure were significantly higher in patients compared to the controls (P < 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction and right ventricular end-diastolic diameter were not statistically different between the groups (P > 0.05). Right ventricular septal strain, right ventricular free wall strain, average longitudinal right ventricular strain, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, right ventricular systolic myocardial velocity, and right ventricular fractional area change were lower in inflammatory rheumatic patients (P < 0.001). The subgroup analysis showed the same results’ trend for each disease and its own control group comparison.

Conclusions

Cardiac involvement in rheumatologic diseases, especially SLE, RA, and SSc, should always be taken into consideration as there may be silent changes affecting the overall prognosis of patients. Using TTE helps diagnose and make a treatment plan for cardiovascular complications in rheumatic disease patients.

Keywords: Rheumatic diseases, Systemic lupus erythematosus, Systemic scleroderma, Rheumatoid arthritis, Echocardiography

Background

Rheumatic diseases include but are not limited to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), vasculitis, systemic sclerosis (SSc), and spondyloarthropathies can cause several comorbidities, among which cardiovascular ones contribute the most to the mortality [1]. These manifestations have been identified and discussed extensively, as some may be the first presentation of the disease [2]. Rheumatic diseases can affect several aspects of the cardiovascular system, from the pericardium, myocardium, and heart valves to the cardiac conduction system and vasculature [3]. These mainly stem from a combination of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, such as age, gender, obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and smoking, and inflammation caused by rheumatic diseases [4].

Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), the most common type of echocardiogram, is a non-invasive, available, and accurate modality to investigate the heart’s structure and diagnose any dysfunction in it. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the most common representative of left ventricle (LV) systolic function is mainly measured by TTE. In addition, other parameters represent other cardiac functions and may be used in combination to find a certain pathology [5]. Cardiac manifestations of rheumatic diseases are described in the literature [6], however, few studies evaluated atrial and ventricular functions among patients with these diseases using echocardiography [7]. In this study, we aimed to compare the atrial and ventricular function of the heart between patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases and age- and sex-matched healthy controls using TTE for the detection of subclinical changes in rheumatic patients.

Methods

Study design and subjects

In this case–control study, 64 patients with confirmed known inflammatory rheumatic diseases and 64 healthy individuals matched to the patients on the basis of age and sex referred to our institute were selected. All the patients selected were known cases of rheumatic inflammatory disease, including SSc, SLE, RA, or mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) and none of them were in their flare episodes. All the controls were screened for rheumatic inflammatory diseases and were healthy. We excluded individuals with previous cardiac symptoms or known cardiovascular diseases and controls that used possibly confounding medication. Past medical history was taken from patients, including any chronic underlying diseases, smoking status, and drug history. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Qom University of Medical Sciences (IR.MUQ.REC.1400.225) and informed consent was taken from all participants.

Initial clinical assessment

An expert cardiologist measured the heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in both the patients and the control group. Height and weight were measured using common clinical devices by a research clinician. Body surface area (BSA) was reported according to the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) as a commonly used metric for body size modification from weight and height using Boyd’s formula [8].

Echocardiography assessment

TTE was performed according to standardized procedures for the patients and healthy individuals. The cardiologist interpreting echocardiograms was blinded to the group of participants. All procedure techniques and formulas were according to the ASE guidelines [8]. LVEF, LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), LV end-systolic diameter (LVESD), right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (RVEDD), right atrium (RA) area, right ventricular (RV) septal strain, RV free wall strain, average longitudinal RV strain, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), RV systolic myocardial velocity, RV fractional area change (RVFAC), inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter, and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) were reported by the sonographer. All measurements were also compared in each rheumatic disease group, including SLE, RA, and SSc.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The Student’s t-test was used to assess the significance of differences between inflammatory rheumatic patients and healthy individuals; and other analyses for continuous variables. The Chi-square test was used for categorical variables to calculate P value. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the rheumatic disease when possible. Statistical significance was considered a two-sided P value of less than 0.05 in analyses. All analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Patient population and baseline characteristics

We included 64 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases comprised of SLE (n = 30), SSc (n = 21), RA (n = 10), and MCTD (n = 3) in addition to 64 age- and sex-matched healthy individuals. The duration of rheumatic diseases was 36 [12–75] (median [interquartile range]) months. Four patients with hypothyroidism, three with anemia, and two with mild fatty liver were recognized upon history-taking. Smoking was seen only in two patients. Each group consisted of 11 males and 53 females. There was no significant difference between patients and controls in terms of SBP (115.05 ± 6.20 vs. 111.55 ± 18.82; P = 0.160), DBP (73.45 ± 5.26 vs. 73.22 ± 4.52; P = 0.787), and BSA (1.661 ± 0.0572 vs. 1.664 ± 0.0497; P = 0.767). A significant difference between baseline HR was seen between patients and controls (79.61 ± 6.99 vs. 76.75 ± 6.84; P = 0.021). Table 1 summarizes the demographic data of participants.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics

Cases Controls (n = 64) p value
All rheumatic diseases (n = 64) SLE (n = 30) SSc (n = 21) RA (n = 10)
Sex (n)
Male 11 6 2 2 11 1.000
Female 53 24 19 8 53
Age 38.22 ± 11.09 35.13 ± 9.19 41.33 ± 13.79 42.10 ± 8.90 37.64 ± 9.57 0.753
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 115.05 ± 6.20 116.17 ± 5.67 113.52 ± 7.51 114.90 ± 5.45 111.55 ± 18.82 0.160
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 73.45 ± 5.26 74.33 ± 5.25 72.52 ± 5.53 72.20 ± 4.73 73.22 ± 4.52 0.787
Heart rate (pulse/min) 79.61 ± 6.99 80.20 ± 8.77 78.52 ± 5.47 79.20 ± 4.18 76.75 ± 6.84 0.021
Body surface area (m2) 1.661 ± 0.0572 1.667 ± 0.0392 1.640 ± 0.0780 1.681 ± 0.0477 1.664 ± 0.0497 0.767

Data are represented as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables

SLE systemic lupus erythematosus, SSc systemic sclerosis, RA rheumatoid arthritis

Echocardiographic findings

The complete results of TTE are available in Table 2. There were no significant differences in LVEF and RVEDD between patients and controls (53.91 ± 6.00 vs. 55.16 ± 0.88, P = 0.104 and 28.66 ± 2.69 vs. 28.05 ± 1.69, P = 0.128, respectively). However, LVEDD, LVESD, and RA area were significantly higher in patients compared to the controls (P < 0.001). Moreover, there were significantly higher IVC diameter and PASP in patients compared to the controls (15.03 ± 3.18 vs. 12.06 ± 2.14, P < 0.001, and 30.61 ± 8.51 vs. 19.19 ± 1.92, P < 0.001, respectively). All other measures, including average longitudinal RV strain, TAPSE, RV systolic myocardial velocity, and RV fractional change area were significantly lower in patients compared to the controls (P < 0.001).

Table 2.

Echocardiography results

All rheumatic diseases SLE (n = 30) Systemic sclerosis (n = 21) Rheumatoid arthritis (n = 10)
HC (n = 64) Cases (n = 64) P value HC SLE p value HC SSc p value HC RA p value
LVEF (%) 55.16 ± 0.88 53.91 ± 6.00 0.104 55.17 ± 0.91 54.33 ± 2.54 0.099 55.24 ± 1.09 55.00 ± 2.24 0.663 55.00 ± 0.00 54.50 ± 1.58 0.331
LVEDD (mm) 40.03 ± 3.35 47.23 ± 3.82  < 0.001 39.57 ± 3.45 47.03 ± 4.13  < 0.001 39.48 ± 2.66 46.95 ± 3.58  < 0.001 41.90 ± 3.76 48.20 ± 3.05 0.001
LVESD (mm) 23.27 ± 4.84 30.86 ± 4.90  < 0.001 23.10 ± 4.55 30.37 ± 5.23  < 0.001 22.19 ± 4.66 29.52 ± 3.43  < 0.001 25.30 ± 5.62 33.50 ± 3.92 0.001
RVEDD (mm) 28.05 ± 1.69 28.66 ± 2.69 0.128 27.90 ± 1.71 28.37 ± 3.00 0.463 28.00 ± 1.55 28.38 ± 2.08 0.505 28.30 ± 2.06 29.00 ± 1.83 0.431
RA area (cm2) 11.41 ± 1.90 13.07 ± 2.85  < 0.001 11.50 ± 1.80 13.17 ± 3.42 0.022 11.62 ± 2.29 12.67 ± 2.35 0.152 11.10 ± 1.45 13.05 ± 2.17 0.029
RV septal strain (%) 21.05 ± 2.11 16.33 ± 4.00  < 0.001 20.83 ± 2.35 16.03 ± 4.31  < 0.001 20.67 ± 1.93 15.90 ± 2.93  < 0.001 22.00 ± 1.49 17.40 ± 4.95 0.017
RV free wall strain (%) 26.47 ± 2.59 23.23 ± 4.14  < 0.001 26.73 ± 1.87 23.07 ± 4.00  < 0.001 26.19 ± 1.89 22.57 ± 3.70  < 0.001 25.80 ± 4.76 24.30 ± 4.52 0.479
Average longitudinal RV strain (%) 24.09 ± 2.08 19.31 ± 3.68  < 0.001 24.10 ± 1.99 19.03 ± 3.52  < 0.001 23.48 ± 1.89 18.67 ± 3.10  < 0.001 24.80 ± 2.25 20.70 ± 4.57 0.020
TAPSE (mm) 25.61 ± 1.53 21.70 ± 2.99  < 0.001 25.77 ± 1.28 21.77 ± 2.49  < 0.001 25.62 ± 1.53 22.33 ± 2.94  < 0.001 25.10 ± 2.28 20.90 ± 3.32 0.004
RV systolic myocardial velocity (cm/s) 15.86 ± 1.48 12.73 ± 2.30  < 0.001 15.97 ± 1.40 12.70 ± 2.31  < 0.001 16.00 ± 1.34 13.05 ± 2.06  < 0.001 15.10 ± 2.02 12.50 ± 1.51 0.004
RV fractional area change (%) 37.83 ± 3.13 29.53 ± 7.18  < 0.001 37.67 ± 2.93 29.44 ± 7.37  < 0.001 37.14 ± 3.18 27.42 ± 6.41  < 0.001 38.80 ± 3.22 32.30 ± 4.42 0.001
IVC diameter (mm) 12.06 ± 2.14 15.03 ± 3.18  < 0.001 11.67 ± 2.12 15.07 ± 2.91  < 0.001 12.48 ± 2.46 15.52 ± 3.38 0.002 12.00 ± 1.33 13.30 ± 2.11 0.120
SPAP 19.19 ± 1.92 30.61 ± 8.51  < 0.001 19.17 ± 1.58 30.43 ± 9.84  < 0.001 18.90 ± 2.00 31.81 ± 7.42  < 0.001 20.20 ± 2.62 27.80 ± 5.10 0.001

Data are represented as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables

HC healthy control, SLE systemic lupus erythematosus, SSc systemic sclerosis, RA rheumatoid arthritis, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEDD left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, LVESD left ventricular end-systolic diameter, RVEDD right ventricular end-diastolic diameter, RA right atrium, RV right ventricle, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, IVC inferior vena cava, SPAP systolic pulmonary artery pressure

In rheumatic disease subgroups, the results were almost similar with minor differences. There was no significant difference in the RA area between SSc patients and their controls (12.67 ± 2.35 vs. 11.62 ± 2.29, P = 0.152). In RA cases and controls, the RV-free wall strain and IVC diameter lost their significance (P = 0.479 and P = 0.120, respectively).

Discussion

In this study, we evaluated the atrial and ventricular function of inflammatory rheumatic disease patients and compared them with healthy controls. Almost all parameters in patients with rheumatic disease except LVEF and RVEDD significantly differed from the control group. Subgroup analyses showed cardiac involvement in each SLE, SSc, and RA group.

Rheumatic diseases are responsible for myocardial, pericardial, valvular, electrical, and vascular changes in the cardiovascular system [3]. Increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines [9], atherosclerosis [10], chronic inflammation [11], and underlying autoimmune mechanisms are related to cardiovascular involvement in patients with rheumatic diseases [12]. As cardiovascular manifestations of rheumatic diseases may be silent or mild, early diagnosis and treatment help reduce mortality and morbidity [2]. Our findings implied that even rheumatic disease patients on treatment may have abnormal TTE findings.

SLE is an autoimmune disease that can affect various organs, including the cardiovascular system [13]. It has been shown that cardiovascular events are also higher in SLE patients compared with healthy controls [14]. In our study, LVEF was not significantly different between SLE patients and healthy individuals, which is similar to the study by Huang et al. [15], although, a difference was observed when it came to the 3D echocardiography in this study. While LVEDD and LVESD were higher in SLE patients, RVEDD and RA were the only indifferent parameters between SLE and healthy subjects. Luo et al. assessed echocardiographic findings in SLE patients with different levels of pulmonary hypertension and they found no difference in terms of RVEDD and RV fractional area curve and TAPSE except for the ones with moderate/severe pulmonary hypertension [16]. All in all, cardiac involvement is serious in SLE patients, and even in asymptomatic patients; a non-invasive method such as echocardiography can be helpful for the early detection of abnormalities [17].

Manifestations of SSc as another autoimmune disease are not limited to the skin, in a way that it can affect the whole body, including musculoskeletal, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, renal, endocrine, and cardiovascular systems [18]. Cardiac complications of SSc may manifest as myocardial or pericardial damage, conduction system fibrosis, and valvular diseases; however, pulmonary hypertension caused by SSc is also responsible for cardiovascular involvement [19]. In a study by Huez et al., right ventricular diastolic dysfunction was seen among patients diagnosed with SSc, caused by latent pulmonary hypertension [20]. Following with the mentioned study, our study showed that the SPAP in the patient group was approximately 1.7 times that of the control group, indicating the presence of pulmonary hypertension in a significant proportion of SSc patients. Therefore, a simple TTE can have clinical implications in preventing this serious complication.

RA with a prevalence of about 1%, can have extra-articular presentations, including cardiovascular ones [21, 22]. Pericarditis is the most common cardiac manifestation, followed by myocarditis, congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and pericardial effusion [23]. The findings of our study suggest left ventricular dysfunction in RA cases shown by several parameters. This is in line with the results of a study by Myasoedova et al., which showed abnormal LV remodeling in RA patients without heart failure [24].

Although we did our best to make the study flawless, there were some limitations to our study. First, all the patients were selected from one center with the same ethnicity, which may threaten its generalizability. Second, despite highly-skilled cardiologists performing the TTE, this test is operator-related and may be erroneous in some cases. Finally, echocardiographic assessment in inflammatory rheumatic diseases has not been done much in the literature, and further research with more sample size is highly recommended.

Conclusions

In conclusion, cardiac involvement in rheumatic diseases, especially SLE, SSc, and RA should always be considered as there may be silent changes in the heart affecting the overall prognosis of patients. Echocardiography is a safe and feasible tool for clinicians to diagnose and prevent such complications and reduce the total burden of the diseases.

Acknowledgements

None.

Abbreviations

SLE

Systemic lupus erythematosus

RA

Rheumatoid arthritis

SSc

Systemic sclerosis

TTE

Transthoracic echocardiography

LVEF

Left ventricular ejection fraction

LV

Left ventricle

MCTD

Mixed connective tissue disease

HR

Heart rate

SBP

Systolic blood pressure

DBP

Diastolic blood pressure

BSA

Body surface area

ASE

American Society of Echocardiography

LVEDD

Left-ventricular end-diastolic diameter

LVESD

Left-ventricular end-systolic diameter

RVEDD

Right-ventricular end-diastolic diameter

RV

Right ventricular

TAPSE

Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion

RVFAC

Right ventricular fractional area change

IVC

Inferior vena cava

SPAP

Systolic pulmonary artery pressure

SD

Standard deviation

SPSS

Statistical package for the social sciences

Author contributions

SN: study conception/manuscript drafting/data collection/critical revision; AK: manuscript drafting/data analysis/revision; MN: manuscript drafting/revision; SSR: manuscript writing/revision; AHB: manuscript writing/revision; MM: study conception/manuscript drafting/data collection/critical revision. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Funding:

None.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due they are part of a database, containing further, not yet published data. However, data used in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All the experimental protocol involving humans was in accordance with guidelines of national/international/institutional or Declaration of Helsinki in the manuscript. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Qom University of Medical Sciences (IR.MUQ.REC.1400.225). As all the patients and controls were more than 16 years old, written informed consent was taken from all participants to participate in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Somayyeh Norouzi and Amirmohammad Khalaji contributed equally as the first author

Contributor Information

Amirmohammad Khalaji, Email: amirm.khalaji@gmail.com.

Amir Hossein Behnoush, Email: amirhossein.behnoush@gmail.com.

Maryam Masoumi, Email: m.masoumiy@gmail.com.

References:

  • 1.Avina-Zubieta JA, Thomas J, Sadatsafavi M, Lehman AJ, Lacaille D. Risk of incident cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(9):1524–1529. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Prasad M, Hermann J, Gabriel SE, Weyand CM, Mulvagh S, Mankad R, et al. Cardiorheumatology: cardiac involvement in systemic rheumatic disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12(3):168–176. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kitas G, Banks MJ, Bacon PA. Cardiac involvement in rheumatoid disease. Clin Med (Lond) 2001;1(1):18–21. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.1-1-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nurmohamed MT, Heslinga M, Kitas GD. Cardiovascular comorbidity in rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11(12):693–704. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kou S, Caballero L, Dulgheru R, Voilliot D, De Sousa C, Kacharava G, et al. Echocardiographic reference ranges for normal cardiac chamber size: results from the NORRE study. Eur Heart J - Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;15(6):680–690. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jet284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Owlia MB, Mostafavi Pour Manshadi SMY, Naderi N. Cardiac manifestations of rheumatological conditions: a narrative review. ISRN Rheumatol. 2012;2012:463620. doi: 10.5402/2012/463620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Makavos G, Varoudi M, Papangelopoulou K, Kapniari E, Plotas P, Ikonomidis I, et al. Echocardiography in autoimmune rheumatic diseases for diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular complications. Medicina (Kaunas) 2020;56(9):445. doi: 10.3390/medicina56090445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mitchell C, Rahko PS, Blauwet LA, Canaday B, Finstuen JA, Foster MC, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic examination in adults: recommendations from the american society of echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019;32(1):1–64. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guilherme L, Cury P, Demarchi LM, Coelho V, Abel L, Lopez AP, et al. Rheumatic heart disease: proinflammatory cytokines play a role in the progression and maintenance of valvular lesions. Am J Pathol. 2004;165(5):1583–1591. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63415-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ruscitti P, Cipriani P, Liakouli V, Iacono D, Pantano I, Margiotta DPE, et al. Subclinical and clinical atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the 3-year, multicentre, prospective, observational GIRRCS (Gruppo Italiano di Ricerca in Reumatologia Clinica e Sperimentale) study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1975-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mason JC, Libby P. Cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic inflammation: mechanisms underlying premature cardiovascular events in rheumatologic conditions. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(8):482–489. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Klingenberg R. The heart in rheumatic, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(40):2985. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx556. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, Masi AT, Mcshane DJ, Rothfield NF, et al. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthr Rheum: Off J Am Coll Rheumatol. 1982;25(11):1271–1277. doi: 10.1002/art.1780251101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Manzi S, Meilahn EN, Rairie JE, Conte CG, Medsger TA, Jr, Jansen-McWilliams L, et al. Age-specific incidence rates of myocardial infarction and angina in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison with the Framingham Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145(5):408–415. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huang BT, Yao HM, Huang H. Left ventricular remodeling and dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus: a three-dimensional speckle tracking study. Echocardiography. 2014;31(9):1085–1094. doi: 10.1111/echo.12515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Luo R, Cui H, Huang D, Sun L, Song S, Sun M, et al. Early assessment of right ventricular function in systemic lupus erythematosus patients using strain and strain rate imaging. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018;111(1):75–81. doi: 10.5935/abc.20180091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mohammed AG, Alghamdi AA, MA AL, Al-Homood IA. Echocardiographic findings in asymptomatic systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2017;36(3):563–8. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 18.Adigun R, Goyal A, Hariz A (2022) Systemic sclerosis. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2022, StatPearls Publishing LLC
  • 19.Lambova S. Cardiac manifestations in systemic sclerosis. World J Cardiol. 2014;6(9):993–1005. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i9.993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Huez S, Roufosse F, Vachiéry JL, Pavelescu A, Derumeaux G, Wautrecht JC, et al. Isolated right ventricular dysfunction in systemic sclerosis: Latent pulmonary hypertension? Eur Respir J. 2007;30(5):928–936. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00025607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Drossaers-Bakker KW, Zwinderman AH, Vliet Vlieland TP, Van Zeben D, Vos K, Breedveld FC, et al. Long-term outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: a simple algorithm of baseline parameters can predict radiographic damage, disability, and disease course at 12-year followup. Arthr Rheum. 2002;47(4):383–390. doi: 10.1002/art.10513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Braunwald E (2001) Textbook of heart disease. Harcourt, Brace
  • 23.Rawla P. Cardiac and vascular complications in rheumatoid arthritis. Reumatologia. 2019;57(1):27–36. doi: 10.5114/reum.2019.83236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Myasoedova E, Davis JM, 3rd, Crowson CS, Roger VL, Karon BL, Borgeson DD, et al. Brief report: rheumatoid arthritis is associated with left ventricular concentric remodeling: results of a population-based cross-sectional study. Arthr Rheum. 2013;65(7):1713–1718. doi: 10.1002/art.37949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due they are part of a database, containing further, not yet published data. However, data used in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from The Egyptian Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of Egyptian Society of Cardiology

RESOURCES