Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Jul 7;70(1):e29851. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29851

Clinical outcomes and considerations of gender-affirming care for transgender and gender-diverse pediatric and young adult patients with cancer

Abigail M Kempf 1, Zackory T Burns 2, Carly E Guss 3,4, Kate Millington 4,5, Sarah Pilcher 5, Patrick J Boyle 6, Brittany M Charlton 3,7,8, Daphne A Haas-Kogan 6, Kevin X Liu 6
PMCID: PMC9701144  NIHMSID: NIHMS1815910  PMID: 35713118

To the Editor:

Approximately 0.5-2.7% of the population identify as transgender and/or gender diverse (TGD); however, little is known about TGD pediatric and young adult patients with cancer.15 To characterize outcomes for this patient population, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 14 patients who self-identified as TGD and were evaluated before 21 years of age for a cancer diagnosis at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Boston Children’s Hospital (BCH) between 1978-2020. Patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes and clinic notes from the Gender Multispecialty Service (GeMS) at BCH6 or containing terms used to document TGD identity as previously described.2 Clinic notes available in the medical record from 1990-2021 were reviewed, and all patients had completed cancer treatment.

Table 1 summarizes cohort characteristics, including aspects of gender-affirming care (GAC). After disclosure of TGD identity to providers, seven (50%) and four (28%) patients’ notes had misgendering and incorrect name usage, respectively; these instances occurred in notes from 2018-2021 for six patients (75%). Five (36%) patients received gender-affirming surgery (GAS) with no noted complications. Of the eleven (79%) patients who received gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAH), two developed meningiomas a median of 31.2 years (range: 28.5-33.9) after cranial irradiation and median of 6.6 years (range: 3.2-10.0) after starting GAH. One patient received GAH four months before diagnosis of a serous borderline ovarian tumor, and post-surgery restarted GAH after multidisciplinary discussion with the patient and family.5 No other patients had significant side effects. Twelve (86%) patients’ oncology notes reported discussion with other specialty providers regarding the intersection of GAC and cancer treatment or survivorship care, including GAH dose adjustments for treatment-associated hypogonadism and discussion of increased risk of stroke with estradiol for a patient who had previously suffered a stroke after chemotherapy and radiation for a brain tumor.

Table 1.

Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and characteristics of gender-affirming care of transgender and gender-diverse pediatric and young adult patients with cancer

Characteristic No. (%); Median (range)

Sex designated at birth (n=14)
   Female 9 (64%)
   Male 5 (36%)

Gender Identity (n=14)
   Girl/Woman/Transfeminine 3 (21%)
   Boy/Man/Transmasculine 8 (57%)
   Gender Fluid 1 (7%)
   Nonbinary 2 (14%)

Race/Ethnicity (n=14)
   Non-Hispanic White 13 (93%)
   Other 1 (7%)

Median age at cancer diagnosis (n=14) 10.5 years (range: 2.5-19.8)

Cancer histology (n=14)
   Hematologic malignancy 6 (43%)
   Solid tumor 8 (57%)

Cancer treatment (n=14)
   Systemic therapy 11 (79%)
   Surgery 10 (71%)
   Radiation 9 (64%)

Median follow-up after cancer diagnosis (n=14) 12.2 years (range: 1.6-41.3).

Age at which patients disclosed to providers regarding their gender identity (n=14) 15.5 years (range: 11.5-36.0)

Cancer diagnosis before self-identifying as TGD to providers (n=14)
   No 10 (71%)
   Yes 4 (28%)

Median time to self-identifying as TGD to providers after cancer diagnosis (n=10) 9.5 years (range: 4.2-33.0)

Gender-affirming hormone therapy* (n=14)
   None 3 (21%)
   Before cancer diagnosis 1 (7%)
   After cancer diagnosis 10 (71%)

Age at gender-affirming hormone therapy (n=11) 25.0 years (range: 14.5-31.2)

Median follow-up after gender-affirming hormone therapy (n=11) 2.7 years (range: 0.3-10.0)

Gender-affirming surgery† after cancer treatment (n=14)
   None 9 (64%)
   Before cancer diagnosis 0 (0%)
   After cancer diagnosis 5 (36%)

Age at gender-affirming surgery (n=5) 26.1 years (range: 17.3-29.9)

Median follow-up time after gender-affirming surgery (n=5) 5.2 years (range: 2.4-15.1)

Documented discussion regarding fertility preservation before starting GAH (n=11)
   No 6 (55%)
   Yes 5 (45%)

Pursued fertility preservation before starting GAH (n=5)
   No 5 (100%)
   Yes 0 (0%)

Status at last follow-up (n=14)
   Alive without evidence of disease 13 (93%)
   Dead of toxicity 1 (7%)

Notes regarding coordination of gender-affirming care between oncology and other specialty providers (n=14)
   No 2 (14%)
   Yes 12 (86%)

Notes with incorrect pronoun usage by oncology providers (n=14)
   No 7 (50%)
   Yes 7 (50%)

Notes with incorrect name usage by oncology providers (n=14)
   No 10 (71%)
   Yes 4 (28%)
*

Includes gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists

Includes bilateral mastectomies, bilateral salpingo-oophrectomies, unilateral salpingo-oophrectomy, and bilateral orchiectomies

Abbreviations: TGD, transgender and gender-diverse

Our cohort had excellent clinical outcomes after multimodal cancer treatment, but we found that TGD patients may benefit from specific considerations regarding GAC.2,5 Inconsistent usage of pronouns/names was prevalent in oncology and survivorship notes, suggesting providers may benefit from further education.710 Most TGD patients shared their gender identity with providers after their cancer diagnosis, and many during survivorship care. Most patients received multidisciplinary care, emphasizing the importance of care coordination for this population. Although follow-up after GAC was relatively short, our cohort had limited complications or toxicity. It is unclear whether the cancers that occurred after GAH were associated with hormones; however, secondary meningiomas can occur after cranial irradiation.11 While no patients in our cohort underwent fertility preservation prior to GAC, conversations regarding fertility preservation and reproductive health remain important.1214

Our study is limited by small cohort size, retrospective design, and reliance on medical record review. In addition, some patients received aspects of cancer treatment or GAC at other institutions. Treatment in this cohort occurred over many decades, during which medical care, including fertility preservation options, cancer therapy, and GAC, have evolved and expanded. Future prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to further explore intersections among cancer care, survivorship care, and GAC coordination, including fertility preservation.

Funding:

KXL is funded by the National Institutes of Health Loan Repayment Program. KM is funded by a grant from the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation. BC is supported by grant MRSG CPHPS 130006 from the American Cancer Society.

Abbreviations:

GAC

gender-affirming care

GAH

gender-affirming hormone therapy

TGD

transgender and gender-diverse

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Prior presentations: Presented in part at the International Society of Paediatric Oncology Virtual Congress, October 21-24, 2021

Data Availability:

The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to ethical/privacy reasons. The data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References:

  • 1.Burns ZT, Bitterman DS, Liu KX, Terezakis SA, Neira PM, Haas-Kogan DA. Towards a standard of care in oncology for transgender patients. Lancet Oncol. Mar 2019;20(3):331–333. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30942-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Burns ZT, Bitterman DS, Perni S, et al. Clinical Characteristics, Experiences, and Outcomes of Transgender Patients With Cancer. JAMA Oncol. Jan 1 2021;7(1):e205671. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.5671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rider GN, McMorris BJ, Gower AL, Coleman E, Eisenberg ME. Health and Care Utilization of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Youth: A Population-Based Study. Pediatrics. Mar 2018;141(3)doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Khazal S, Abdel-Azim H, Kapoor N, Mahadeo KM. Overcoming psychosocial and developmental barriers to blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) in an adolescent/young adult (AYA) transgender patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. Nov 2014;31(8):765–7. doi: 10.3109/08880018.2014.909914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Millington K, Hayes K, Pilcher S, et al. A serous borderline ovarian tumour in a transgender male adolescent. Br J Cancer. Feb 2021;124(3):567–569. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01129-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Spack NP, Edwards-Leeper L, Feldman HA, et al. Children and adolescents with gender identity disorder referred to a pediatric medical center. Pediatrics. Mar 2012;129(3):418–25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-0907 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Paul CR, Wolfe AD, Catallozzi M, Jirasevijinda T, Kutscher E, Lurie B. Teaching Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Pediatric Clinical Settings: A Training Workshop for Faculty and Residents. MedEdPORTAL. Apr 5 2021;17:11137. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chittalia AZ, Marney HL, Tavares S, et al. Bringing Cultural Competency to the EHR: Lessons Learned Providing Respectful, Quality Care to the LGBTQ Community. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020;2020:303–310. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guss CE, Woolverton GA, Borus J, Austin SB, Reisner SL, Katz-Wise SL. Transgender Adolescents’ Experiences in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study. J Adolesc Health. Sep 2019;65(3):344–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.03.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vance SR Jr. The Importance of Getting the Name Right for Transgender and Other Gender Expansive Youth. J Adolesc Health. Oct 2018;63(4):379–380. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.07.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Morgenstern PF, Shah K, Dunkel IJ, et al. Meningioma after radiotherapy for malignancy. J Clin Neurosci. Aug 2016;30:93–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.02.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kenney LB, Cohen LE, Shnorhavorian M, et al. Male reproductive health after childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancers: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. Sep 20 2012;30(27):3408–16. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.6938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mehringer J, Dowshen NL. Sexual and reproductive health considerations among transgender and gender-expansive youth. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. Sep 2019;49(9):100684. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2019.100684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Metzger ML, Meacham LR, Patterson B, et al. Female reproductive health after childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancers: guidelines for the assessment and management of female reproductive complications. J Clin Oncol. Mar 20 2013;31(9):1239–47. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.5511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to ethical/privacy reasons. The data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

RESOURCES