Abstract
Dexamethasone can reduce post‐operative pain and swelling. An appropriate administration of dexamethasone for dental surgical procedures may be local submucosal infiltration. Local delivery may produce a faster onset with more drug at the desired site of action. A single submucosal dose will unlikely produce side effects.
Keywords: dental implant, dental surgery, pain, post‐operative, swelling
Short abstract
Submucosal dexamethasone delivered at an implant surgical site may prevent post‐operative pain and swelling.
1. INTRODUCTION
Dental surgeons use local or systemic dexamethasone (DX) to minimize post‐operative symptoms (Figure 1). 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 DX can be administered topically, intramuscularly, intravenously, intra‐alveolarly, and submucosally. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 Local submucosal infiltration may be the best method to administer DX for appropriate minimization of postoperative pain, trismus, and edema. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 While oral, intravenous, or intramuscular administration is also appropriate, local administration is more convenient and performs equally well. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6
FIGURE 1.

Molecular structure of dexamethasone.
While previous work was done for post‐operative third molar removal, DX may have applications in dental implant surgery.
A 4 mg submucosal dose may the most efficacious since a higher dose has been shown to be of no benefit in third molar extraction. 4 , 5 , 7
2. PHARMACOLOGY OF DEXAMETHASONE
Dexamethasone is a glucocorticoid and is used to treat a multiplicity of diseases and disorders including arthritis, allergies, asthma, obstructive pulmonary diseases, croup, adrenocortical insufficiency among others. 8 DX is an anti‐inflammatory and immunosuppressant. It is 68% bound in plasma. 9 It was approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration in 1961. It is listed on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines. It is available for oral, topical, submucosal, intramuscular, and intravenous administration. The effects generally occur within 24 h and in as little as 10 min and can last up to 3 days. 8 Long‐term usage may induce significant side effects such as candidiasis, bone loss, cataracts, hiccups, and muscle weakness. 8 It should only be used during pregnancy if the benefits out‐weigh the teratogenic risks for use (FDA Category C). 8
Dexamethasone reduces prostaglandins and leukotrienes and blocks phospholipase A2. 4 DX is more potent than cortisol. 4 DX can be administered orally, intra‐alveolarly, submucosally, intravenously, and intramuscularly. 4 , 5
Four milligram infiltrated locally at an oral surgical site can reduce pain, swelling, and inflammation. 4 , 5 Post‐operative healing depends on inflammation and angiogenesis. This is a complex process and DX may inhibit angiogenesis by inhibition of VEGF. 10
Since DX is not well studied for pregnant patients, the FDA has a rating of Category C. Nonetheless, a low dose may be safe but consultation with the patient's physician to evaluate the risk–benefit is appropriate. 11
The permeability of intra‐alveolar administration of DX was evaluated in silico and found that its molecular characteristics would facilitate intra‐alveolar administration. 5
Dexamethasone is a potent anti‐inflammatory agent with a long half‐life of 36–72 h when administered intramuscularly. 9 There are side effects of DX, nonetheless, a short course of low‐dose therapy, in the absence of contraindications, is unlikely to be harmful. 9 Patients with DX contraindications may not be appropriate for dental implant surgery. Careful preoperative evaluation is appropriate for every dental implant patient.
3. CLINICAL USEAGE
Dexamethasone is commonly used to treat nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia. 12 There is a dearth of evidence on drug safety, nonetheless, a single 4 mg dose may not be detrimental. 12 Nonetheless, careful administration should be done to avoid injection into a blood vessel.
While there are several studies of DX for successful post‐operative pain and trismus control, a systematic analysis showed that the evidence is inadequate to and beyond the seventh post‐operative day. 4 Nonetheless, several studies did find adequate pain and trismus control with submucosal DX. 4 Thus, DX seems to be effective for early post‐operative pain and trismus control, but this is yet to be confirmed with a systematic analysis. 4
Infiltration of DX in close proximity to the surgical site brings the drug close to the target and an increased dosage as compared to an oral dose. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4
Dexamethasone combined with acetaminophen can reduce myalgia associated with acute phase response, following initial zoledronic acid treatment. 13 A combination of pain relievers may increase the effectiveness of DX. However, DX combined with alendronate can increase the formation of necrotic bone by increasing the accumulation of macrophages. Thus, dental implant patients taking an alendronate may not be good candidates for DX administration. 14 Accumulation of macrophages around an endosseous dental implant may induce an osseonecrosis. 14 Additionally, patients taking DX for a few weeks may be prone to developing sequestra following tooth extraction, especially if zolendronic acid is also being administered. 15
Orally administered DX has been used for postoperative pain and swelling and inflammation. 4 This is usually taken for several days. However, low‐dose local submucosal administration may be as effective and convenient with fewer side effects. 5
Intra‐alveolar administration of DX requires an open osseous wound. Four milligram of the powder form of DX can be placed intra‐alveolarly and can perform well to prevent edema and pain. 5 This form of administration may be useful for osseous edentulous split ridges where there may be an osseous opening of the edentulous ridge and in osseous donor sites (Figure 2). An open osseous wound that is not primarily closed may allow the powder to be washed out by blood and oral fluids. Thus, primary closure may be necessary. A DX carrier made of a polymeric starch combined with polycaprolactone may be soon available for intra‐alveolar delivery. 16
FIGURE 2.

A split osseous ridge may leave openings into which intra‐osseous dexamethasone can be delivered. After ridge splitting, the wound should be primarily covered with mucosa or gingiva or with a barrier to prevent loss of a clot and applied dexamethasone.
Because of its long half‐life, DX may be used as a depot drug for repeated submucosal injections at the surgical site if required. 4
Since DX is FDA Category C, the use of DX for dental treatment should benefit the patient more than the risk for teratogenic outcomes. 8 Generally, the dosages used in implant dentistry would be small but there is no research that obviates this risk.
4. SIDE EFFECTS OF DEXAMETHASONE
Side effects include candidiasis, bone loss, cataracts, hiccups, and muscle weakness but no studies have found severe complications with submucosal or intra‐alveolar DX. 4
Dexamethasone can inhibit platelet aggregation in rats. 17 Rats were daily orally administered 1–4 mg/kg of DX for 5 days. Fibrolytic activity was decreased at 3 mg/kg but not at 1 mg/kg and yet arterial thrombosis was decreased at low doses. Platelet aggregation inhibition is counter‐acted at higher doses because of decreased fibrinolytic activity. 17 This was an in vivo study in rats, nonetheless, a single 4 mg submucosal dose is 0.06 mg/kg and is far below any suspected platelet action.
High doses of DX administered for long terms can cause mesenchymal stem cell apoptosis, inhibit the proliferation of mesenchymal stromal cells and may cause certain skeletal disorders. 18 Low dose, short‐term doses may stimulate osteogenesis. 18 This phenomenon may be beneficial in implant dentistry. Most studies use high, long‐term doses of DX and thus may not be appropriate for single low‐dose DX study. The effects of DX on bone formation and especially on bone formation in grafted sites need elucidation.
One interesting side effect of DX is hiccups. Hiccups (singular: singultus, plural: singulata) are involuntary, spasms of the diaphragm. 19 Hiccups lasting longer than 48 h are considered pathological and may be indicative of a neurological disorder. 19 Hiccups more commonly occur in patients with malignancies and infections, such as COVID‐19, who are administered DX. 19 The low dosages of DX presented herein are unlikely to cause hiccups. 20
5. CASE EXAMPLES
A 67‐year‐old female presented for extraction and implant placement of an unrestorable mandibular first premolar (#21). The patient's medical history was unremarkable for dental implant treatment. The treatment risks and sequence were explained, and the patient accepted, and informed consent obtained. The site was locally anesthetized with 1.6cc articaine (Septocaine) and she orally rinsed with chlorhexidine. The unrestorable #21 was sectioned mesio‐distally and the facial and lingual segments elevated out and the socket debrided. The site was then prepared in the usual fashion for immediate dental implant fixture placement. A 3.2 × 10 mm Implant Direct implant was placed to 35ncm. Space between the implant fixture and the socket bone and above the implant platform was filled with an 80:20 mixture of an alloplast (Puros) and CaSO4. The socket was then covered with a collagen barrier (Ossix) and secured with 3‐0 chromic suture (Gibson). Four milligram DX was then infiltrated into the facial mucosa. The patient was instructed as to post‐operative care. Twenty‐four hours later the patient was called. She reported that she had no pain or swelling. The patient returned at 7 days and reported no pain or swelling. After 4 months the implant was restored with a porcelain fused‐to‐noble alloy crown.
A 47‐year‐old female requested treatment for painful and fractured mandibular left posterior teeth. After an options discussion and securing of informed consent, the left mandible was infiltrated with 1.6cc articailne (Septiopcaine). 2000 mg amoxicillin was orally administered preoperatively. The mandibular left premolar were carious and fractured and deemed unrestorable. A full thickness flap was raised. These were surgically extracted and thoroughly debrided. A 3.2 × 8 Implant Direct implant was placed in the first molar site and a 3.2 × 13 implant was immediately placed in the first premolar socket. The area was covered with a 80:20 mix of allograft (Puros) and calcium sulfate. A collagen barrier was placed (Ossix). Primary closure was obtained with 3‐0 chromic suture (Gibson). Four milligram dexamethasone was infiltrated submucosally at the facial of the surgical site. The patient was prescribed amoxicillin 875 mg BID and clorhexidene BID for 1 week. The next day the patient was called and asked to describe the pain she was having on a 1 out of 10 scale. She reported a 1. After 1 week the sutures were removed and the patient reported only slight soreness at that time. After 8 weeks healing was evaluated and found to be appropriate. After 4 months the implants were successfully restored with fixed cement retained crowns.
6. DISCUSSION
These case reports demonstrate that DX may be a useful medication to minimize post‐operative pain and swelling. Nonetheless, most implant surgeries, when performed skillfully, may not be very traumatic nor cause severe post‐operative pain. However, some patients may be particularly susceptible to post‐operative sequalae and so DX may be beneficial.
7. CONCLUSIONS
A single local 4 mg submucosal infiltration of dexamethasone adjacent to the surgical site may be appropriate to minimize postoperative pain and swelling after dental implant surgery. Nonetheless, clinical trials are needed to verify this and any effects on osseous healing. The single low 4 mg dose used is very unlikely to induce severe side effects.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION
The author is the sole contributor to this work.
FUNDING INFORMATION
The author claims to be the sole funder of this work.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Author claims that there are no financial, commercial, or political conflicts of interest.
CONSENT
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this report in accordance with the journal's patient consent policy.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
None.
Flanagan D. Submucosal administration of dexamethasone for dental implant surgery. Clin Case Rep. 2022;10:e06589. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.6589
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1. Majid OW. Submucosal dexamethasone injection improves quality of life measures after third molar surgery: a comparative study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(9):2289‐2297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Majid OW, Mahmood WK. Effect of submucosal and intramuscular dexamethasone on postoperative sequelae after third molar surgery: comparative study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;49(8):647‐652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Freda NM, Keenan AV. Moderate evidence to recommend submucosal injection of dexamethasone in reducing post‐operative oedema and pain after third molar extraction. Evid Based Dent. 2016;17(2):58‐59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Chen Q, Chen J, Hu B, Feng G, Song J. Submucosal injection of dexamethasone reduces postoperative discomfort after third‐molar extraction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2017;148(2):81‐91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Marques RV, Branco‐de‐Almeida LS, Marques DM, et al. Effect of the intra‐alveolar administration of dexamethasone on swelling, trismus, and pain after impacted lower third molar extraction: a randomized, double‐blind clinical trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021;27:e51‐e58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Lau AAL, De Silva RK, Thomson M, De Silva H, Tong D. Third molar surgery outcomes: a randomized clinical trial comparing submucosal and intravenous dexamethasone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;79(2):295‐304. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.09.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Grossi GB, Maiorana C, Garramone RA, et al. Effect of submucosal injection of dexamethasone on postoperative discomfort after third molar surgery: a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(11):2218‐2226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. The American Society of Health‐System Pharmacists . Accessed August 31, 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/20170831175940/https:/www.drugs.com/monograph/dexamethasone.html
- 9. Schimmere BP, Parker KL. Section XIII. In: Hardman J, ed. Goodman and Gilman's the Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 9th ed. McGraw‐Hill; 1996:1459‐1519. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Langendorf EK, Rommens PM, Drees P, Ritz U. Dexamethasone inhibits the pro‐angiogenic potential of primary human myoblasts. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(15):7986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Sanga V, Lenzini L, Seccia TM, Rossi GP. Familial hyperaldosteronism type 1 and pregnancy: successful treatment with low dose dexamethasone. Blood Press. 2021;30(2):133‐137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Weibel S, Schaefer MS, Raj D, et al. Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: an abridged Cochrane network meta‐analysis. Anaesthesia. 2021;76(7):962‐973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Chen FP, Fu TS, Lin YC, Lin YJ. Addition of dexamethasone to manage acute phase responses following initial zoledronic acid infusion. Osteoporos Int. 2021;32(4):663‐670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Inoue M, Matsumoto C, Nakajima K, Kuroshima S, Sawase T. Alendronate/dexamethasone combination therapy worsens soft and hard tissue wound healing around implants in rat maxillae. Bone. 2021;148:115942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Jabbour Z, El‐Hakim M, Henderson JE, de Albuquerque RF Jr. Bisphosphonates inhibit bone remodeling in the jaw bones of rats and delay healing following tooth extractions. Oral Oncol. 2014;50(5):485‐490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Balmayor ER, Tuzlakoglu K, Marques AP, Azevedo HS, Reis RL. A novel enzymatically‐mediated drug delivery carrier for bone tissue engineering applications: combining biodegradable starch‐based microparticles and differentiation agents. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19(4):1617‐1623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. van Giezen JJ, Chung‐A‐Hing JE, Vegter CB, Bouma BN, Jansen JW. Fibrinolytic activity in blood is distributed over a cellular and the plasma fraction which can be modulated separately. Thromb Haemost. 1994;72(6):887‐892. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Li T, Xu Y, Wang Y, Jiang Y. Differential expression profiles of long noncoding RNAs and mRNAs in human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells after exposure to a high dosage of dexamethasone. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Karampoor S, Afrashteh F, Laali A. Persistent hiccups after treatment of COVID‐19 with dexamethasone: a case report. Respir Med Case Rep. 2021;34:101515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Peacock ME. Transient hiccups associated with oral dexamethasone. Case Rep Dent. 2013;2013:426178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
