Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis logoLink to Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
. 2022 Oct 17;36(11):e24730. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24730

The abnormal level and prognostic potency of multiple inflammatory cytokines in PCI‐treated STEMI patients

Jing Zhang 1,2, Huichuan Xu 1, Mingyan Yao 3, Hongdan Jia 1, Hongliang Cong 1,
PMCID: PMC9701898  PMID: 36245413

Abstract

Objective

Inflammatory cytokines modulate atherogenesis and plaque rupture to involve in ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) progression. The present study determined eight inflammatory cytokine levels in 212 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)‐treated STEMI patients, aiming to comprehensively investigate their potency in estimating major adverse cardiac event (MACE) risk.

Methods

Serum tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α, interleukin (IL)‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐8, IL‐10, IL‐17A, vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1 (VCAM‐1), and intercellular adhesion molecule‐1 (ICAM‐1) of 212 PCI‐treated STEMI patients and 30 angina pectoris patients were determined using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay.

Results

TNF‐α (52.5 (43.9–62.6) pg/ml versus 46.4 (39.0–59.1) pg/ml, p = 0.031), IL‐8 (61.6 (49.6–81.7) pg/ml versus 46.7 (32.5–63.1) pg/ml, p = 0.001), IL‐17A (57.4 (45.7–77.3) pg/ml versus 43.2 (34.2–64.6) pg/ml, p = 0.001), and VCAM‐1 (593.6 (503.4–811.4) ng/ml versus 493.8 (390.3–653.7) ng/ml, p = 0.004) levels were elevated in STEMI patients compared to angina pectoris patients, while IL‐1β (p = 0.069), IL‐6 (p = 0.110), IL‐10 (p = 0.052), and ICAM‐1 (p = 0.069) were of no difference. Moreover, both IL‐17A high (vs. low) (p = 0.026) and VCAM‐1 high (vs. low) (p = 0.012) were linked with increased cumulative MACE rate. The multivariable Cox's analysis exhibited that IL‐17A high (vs. low) (p = 0.034) and VCAM‐1 high (vs. low) (p = 0.014) were independently associated with increased cumulative MACE risk. Additionally, age, diabetes mellitus, C‐reactive protein, multivessel disease, stent length, and stent type were also independent factors for cumulative MACE risk.

Conclusion

IL‐17A and VCAM‐1 high level independently correlate with elevated MACE risk in STEMI patients, implying its potency in identifying patients with poor prognoses.

Keywords: inflammatory cytokine, major adverse cardiac events, percutaneous coronary intervention, prognostic potency, ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction


A total of 212 ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients and 30 angina pectoris patients were enrolled in this study, whose serum tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α, interleukin (IL)‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐8, IL‐10, IL‐17A, vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1 (VCAM‐1), and intercellular adhesion molecule‐1 (ICAM‐1) were determined using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Subsequently, it was observed that TNF‐α (p = 0.031), IL‐8 (p = 0.001), IL‐17A (p = 0.001), and VCAM‐1 (p = 0.004) levels were elevated in STEMI patients compared to angina pectoris patients. Moreover, both IL‐17A high (vs. low) (p = 0.026) and VCAM‐1 high (vs. low) (p = 0.012) were linked with increased cumulative major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate. Furthermore, the multivariable Cox's analysis exhibited that IL‐17A high (vs. low) (p = 0.034) and VCAM‐1 high (vs. low) (p = 0.014) were independently associated with increased cumulative MACE risk. In conclusion, IL‐17A and VCAM‐1 high levels independently correlate with elevated MACE risk in STEMI patients, implying its potency in identifying patients with poor prognoses.

graphic file with name JCLA-36-e24730-g003.jpg


Abbreviation

AUC

area under the curve

CABG

coronary artery bypass grafting.

CI

confidence interval

CK‐MB

creatine kinase‐myocardial band

CRP

C‐reactive protein

cTnI

troponin I

ELISA

enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay

ICAM‐1

intercellular adhesion molecule‐1

IL

interleukin

IQR

interquartile range

LDL‐C

low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol

MACE

major adverse cardiac event

PCI

percutaneous coronary intervention

ROC

receiver‐operating characteristic

STEMI

ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction

TC

total cholesterol

TG

triglyceride

TNF‐α

tumor necrosis factor‐α

VCAM‐1

vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1

1. INTRODUCTION

ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), defined as ST‐segment elevation in two anatomically contiguous leads, is the most urgent manifestation of coronary artery disease. 1 , 2 Over the past decade, the number of new STEMI cases is increasing in China annually, meanwhile, its mortality is constant. 3 Concerning the STEMI treatment, for patients with symptom onset within 12 h, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred strategy to restore myocardial perfusion as soon as possible. 4 , 5 , 6 Unfortunately, the major adverse cardiac event (MACE) frequently occurs after PCI treatment, implying a poor prognosis in STEMI patients. 7 , 8 Hence, it is meaningful to explore reliable biomarkers for monitoring MACE risk in PCI‐treated STEMI patients.

Inflammation is non‐negligible in STEMI etiology, which is considered an essential process that participates in the initiation and progression of atherosclerotic plaque. 9 , 10 , 11 Consequently, some studies notice that the increased level of inflammatory cytokines possesses a certain value in predicting the MACE risk of STEMI patients, including interleukin (IL)‐1, IL‐6, IL‐17, IL‐37, etc. 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 For instance, one study suggests that the high level of IL‐6 is correlated with elevated MACE risk in STEMI patients who receive primary PCI treatment. 13 Another study shows that the high circulating IL‐37 level is a predictor of in‐hospital MACE rate in STEMI patients treated with PCI. 15 However, the previous studies only focus on a single or a few inflammatory cytokines (no more than three), and comprehensive studies focusing on the prognostic value of plentiful inflammatory cytokines in PCI‐treated STEMI patients remain rare.

Therefore, the present study determined eight inflammatory cytokines in 212 PCI‐treated STEMI patients, aiming to comprehensively investigate their potency in estimating MACE risk and identify the prognostic indicators for PCI‐treated STEMI patients.

2. METHODS

2.1. Patients

Two hundred and twelve STEMI patients receiving PCI between April 2018 and February 2021 were enrolled in this prospective study. The enrollment criteria were: (1) presented with STEMI (≥2 mm in two contiguous precordial leads or ≥1 mm in two extremity electrocardiographic leads) within 12 h after symptom onset; (2) older than 18 years old; (3) received PCI for the first time; (4) received peripheral blood (PB) collection immediately after admission. The exclusion criteria were: (1) had contraindications of PCI; (2) had an active hemorrhage or hemorrhagic risk; (3) had a prior history of cardiothoracic surgery; (4) had systemic immune diseases or inflammatory diseases; (5) had cancers or hematologic malignancies. Additionally, a total of 30 angina pectoris patients were also recruited as disease controls. The recruitment criteria were: (1) confirmed as angina pectoris; (2) aged over 18 years old; (3) voluntary for PB sample collection; (4) had cardiothoracic surgery, systemic immune diseases, inflammatory diseases, cancers, or hematologic malignancies. The study was permitted by Ethics Committee. Each patient or family member signed the informed consent.

2.2. Data collection

Clinical characteristics of STEMI patients were obtained, which contained demographics, underlying diseases, and blood laboratory detections. Besides, disease characteristics and PCI operation information of STEMI patients were also collected, which included symptom‐to‐balloon time, multivessel disease, culprit lesion, thrombus aspiration, number of implanted stents, type of stent, stent diameter, stent length, and infarct size (recorded as the infarct size at 3rd day after PCI).

2.3. Sample collection and processing

PB samples were gained from STEMI patients before PCI and from angina pectoris patients after recruitment, then the serum sample was isolated by centrifuge and stored at −80°C. Following that, inflammatory cytokines were detected in batch by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assay using commercial kits (Bio‐Techne China Co., Ltd.). The inflammatory cytokines contained tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α, IL‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐8, IL‐10, IL‐17A, vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1 (VCAM‐1), and intercellular adhesion molecule‐1 (ICAM‐1). The kits used in the study were as follows: Human TNF‐alpha Quantikine ELISA Kit (No. Cat. DTA00D, sensitivity: 6.23 pg/ml, range: 15.6–1000 pg/ml), Human IL‐1 beta/IL‐1F2 Quantikine ELISA Kit (No. Cat. DLB50, sensitivity: 1 pg/ml, range: 3.9–250 pg/ml), Human IL‐6 Quantikine ELISA Kit (No. Cat. D6050, sensitivity: 0.7 pg/ml, range: 3.1–300 pg/ml), Human IL‐8/CXCL8 Quantikine ELISA Kit (No. Cat. D8000C, sensitivity: 7.5 pg/ml, range: 31.2–2000 pg/ml), Human IL‐10 Quantikine ELISA Kit (No. Cat. D1000B, sensitivity: 3.9 pg/ml, range: 7.8–500 pg/ml), Human IL‐17 Quantikine ELISA Kit (No. Cat. D1700, sensitivity: 15 pg/ml, range: 31.2–2000 pg/ml), Human VCAM‐1/CD106 Quantikine ELISA Kit (No. Cat. DVC00, sensitivity: 1.26 ng/ml, range: 6.3–200 ng/ml), Human ICAM‐1/CD54 Quantikine ELISA Kit (No. Cat. DCD540, sensitivity: 0.254 ng/ml, range: 1.6–50 ng/ml). The assays were performed in strict accordance with the kit protocols from manufacturers. In the analysis, the inflammatory cytokines were classified as high and low based on the median values.

2.4. Follow‐up and assessment

Standardized follow‐up was carried out for the STEMI patients until February 2022. The median follow‐up duration was 15.0 months, with the interquartile range of 9.0–24.0 months and the range of 1.0–39.0 months. During the follow‐up, a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) was recorded, which was defined as an occurrence of death for any reason, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization. 16 Then, the cumulative MACE rate was calculated.

2.5. Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS V.22.0 (IBM Corp.). Figure plotting was completed using GraphPad Prism V.6.0 (GraphPad Software Inc.). Data were presented as mean with standard deviation (normal distributed continuous variables), median with interquartile range (skewed distributed continuous variables), and count with percentage (categorized variables). Differences of inflammatory cytokines between STEMI patients and angina pectoris patients were detected by the Mann–Whitney U test. Correlations between cumulative MACE rate and inflammatory cytokines were evaluated by KM curves, and analyzed by log‐rank test, Breslow test, or Tarone‐Ware test, as appropriate. All parameters were included in univariable and step forward multivariable Cox's proportional hazard regression model to assess the factors related to cumulative MACE risk, and the continuous variables were categorized based on the median or the normal values, as appropriate. The predictive ability of IL‐17A and VCAM‐1 for MACE occurrence risk was plotted using the receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Association analyses were performed using Spearman's rank correlation test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Clinical characteristics of STEMI patients

The entire 212 STEMI patients consisted of 57 (26.9%) females and 155 (73.1%) males, with a mean age of 62.6 ± 10.3 years (Table 1). Concerning blood laboratory detections, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) value of troponin I (cTnI) and creatine kinase‐myocardial band (CK‐MB) was 6.3 (4.2–7.9) ng/ml and 53.2 (33.8–75.4) ng/ml, accordingly. The specific clinical characteristics of STEMI patients were exhibited in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Clinical characteristics of STEMI patients

Items STEMI patients (N = 212)
Demographics
Age (years), mean ± SD 62.6 ± 10.3
Gender, No. (%)
Female 57 (26.9)
Male 155 (73.1)
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD 24.9 ± 3.1
Current smoker, No. (%) 80 (37.7)
Underlying diseases
History of hypertension, No. (%) 146 (68.9)
History of hyperlipidemia, No. (%) 94 (44.3)
History of diabetes mellitus, No. (%) 49 (23.1)
Blood laboratory detections
WBC (109/L), mean ± SD 10.5 ± 3.7
FBG (mmol/L), median (IQR) 6.2 (5.4–7.1)
Scr (μmol/L), mean ± SD 87.4 ± 17.1
TG (mmol/L), median (IQR) 2.6 (1.8–3.1)
TC (mmol/L), median (IQR) 5.4 (4.6–6.4)
LDL‐C (mmol/L), median (IQR) 3.9 (3.2–4.7)
HDL‐C (mmol/L), median (IQR) 1.1 (1.0–1.3)
CRP (mg/L), median (IQR) 6.6 (4.7–9.0)
cTnI (ng/ml), median (IQR) 6.3 (4.2–7.9)
CK‐MB (ng/ml), median (IQR) 53.2 (33.8–75.4)

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CK‐MB, creatine kinase‐myocardial band; CRP, C‐reactive protein; cTnI, troponin I; FBG, fasting blood glucose; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; IQR, interquartile range; LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; Scr, serum creatinine; SD, standard deviation; STEMI, ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; WBC, white blood cell.

3.2. Disease and operation information of STEMI patients

The median (IQR) value of symptom‐to‐balloon time was 180.0 (130.0–270.0) min. Besides, 88 (41.5%) patients were assessed with multivessel disease, and the other 124 (58.5%) patients were not. Concerning the stents, 162 (76.4%) patients were implanted with one stent, and the rest 50 (23.6%) patients were implanted with two stents. The median (IQR) values of stent diameter and length were 3.0 (3.0–3.5) mm and 33.0 (23.0–38.0) mm, correspondingly (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Disease and operation information of STEMI patients

Items STEMI patients (N = 212)
Symptom‐to‐balloon time (min), median (IQR) 180.0 (130.0–270.0)
Multivessel disease, No. (%)
No 124 (58.5)
Yes 88 (41.5)
Culprit lesion, No. (%)
LAD 92 (43.4)
LCX 44 (20.8)
RCA 76 (35.8)
Thrombus aspiration, No. (%)
No 170 (80.2)
Yes 42 (19.8)
Number of implanted stents, No. (%)
1 162 (76.4)
2 50 (23.6)
Type of stent, No. (%)
Sirolimus‐eluting stent 153 (72.2)
Everolimus‐eluting stent 59 (27.8)
Stent diameter (mm), median (IQR) 3.0 (3.0–3.5)
Stent length (mm), median (IQR) 33.0 (23.0–38.0)
Infarct size (%), median (IQR) 23.0 (17.3–30.0)

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; LAD, left anterior descending artery; LCX, left circumflex artery; RCA, right coronary artery; STEMI, ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction.

3.3. Inflammatory cytokine levels in STEMI patients and angina pectoris patients

TNF‐α (p = 0.031, Figure 1A), IL‐8 (p = 0.001, Figure 1B), IL‐17A (p = 0.001, Figure 1C), and VCAM‐1 (p = 0.004, Figure 1D) levels were elevated in STEMI patients compared to angina pectoris patients, while IL‐1β (p = 0.069, Figure 1E), IL‐6 (p = 0.110, Figure 1F), IL‐10 (p = 0.052, Figure 1G), and ICAM‐1 (p = 0.069, Figure 1H) were not different between STEMI patients and angina pectoris patients.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

TNF‐α, IL‐8, IL‐17A, and VCAM‐1 were elevated in STEMI patients compared to angina pectoris patients. Comparison of TNF‐α (A), IL‐8 (B), IL‐17A (C), VCAM‐1 (D), IL‐1β (E), IL‐6 (F), IL‐10 (G), and ICAM‐1 (H) between STEMI patients and angina pectoris patients

3.4. Correlation of inflammatory cytokines with infarct size and lipid metabolism in STEMI patients

Subgroup analysis was conducted to investigate the association of inflammatory cytokines with infarct size, which showed that TNF‐α (r = 0.248, p < 0.001), IL‐1β (r = 0.228, p = 0.001), IL‐8 (r = 0.175, p = 0.011), VCAM‐1 (r = 0.175, p = 0.010), and ICAM‐1 (r = 0.203, p = 0.003) were positively associated with infarct size, while IL‐10 (r = −0.201, p = 0.003) was negatively related to infarct size in STEMI patients (Table S1).

Moreover, it was also observed that IL‐17A was positively linked with triglyceride (TG) (r = 0.163, p = 0.017) and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) (r = 0.211, p = 0.002); meanwhile, VCAM‐1 was positively related to TG (r = 0.324, p < 0.001), total cholesterol (TC) (r = 0.176, p = 0.010), and LDL‐C (r = 0.365, p < 0.001) in STEMI patients (Table S2).

3.5. Correlation of inflammatory cytokines with cumulative MACE rate in STEMI patients

The cumulative 1‐year, 2‐year, and 3‐year MACE rates in STEMI patients were 6.1%, 11.6%, and 17.4%, correspondingly (Figure 2A). Furthermore, both IL‐17A high (vs. low) (p = 0.026, Figure 2B) and VCAM‐1 high (vs. low) (p = 0.012, Figure 2C) were linked with increased cumulative MACE rate; whereas TNF‐α high, IL‐1β high, IL‐6 high, IL‐8 high, IL‐10 high, and ICAM‐1 high were not related to cumulative MACE rate in STEMI patients (all p > 0.050, Figure 2D–I).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

IL‐17A high (vs. low) and VCAM‐1 high (vs. low) were linked with increased MACE occurrence in PCI‐treated STEMI patients. The cumulative MACE rate in PCI‐treated STEMI patients (A). Correlation of IL‐17A high (vs. low) (B), VCAM‐1 high (vs. low) (C), TNF‐α high (vs. low) (D), IL‐1β high (vs. low) (E), IL‐6 high (vs. low) (F), IL‐8 high (vs. low) (G), IL‐10 high (vs. low) (H), and ICAM‐1 high (vs. low) (I) with cumulative MACE rate in PCI‐treated STEMI patients

Additionally, ROC curves were performed to determine the predictive ability of IL‐17A and VCAM‐1 for MACE occurrence risk, which showed that IL‐17A could hardly predict MACE occurrence risk (area under the curve (AUC): 0.616, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.500–0.733, Figure S1A), while the predictive value of VCAM‐1 for MACE occurrence risk was favorable (AUC: 0.736, 95% CI: 0.606–0.866, Figure S1B) in STEMI patients. Moreover, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.750 and 0.589 at the best cutoff point of IL‐17A, and they were 0.750 and 0.781 at the best cutoff point of VCAM‐1.

3.6. Independent factors of cumulative MACE risk in STEMI patients

IL‐17A high (vs. low) (p = 0.034) and VCAM‐1 high (vs. low) (p = 0.020) were both related to elevated cumulative MACE risk in STEMI patients. Additionally, history of diabetes mellitus (vs. no) (p = 0.026), C‐reactive protein (CRP) ≥5 mg/L (vs. <5 mg/L) (p = 0.012), cTnI ≥ 4.2 ng/ml (vs. <4.2 ng/ml) (p = 0.040), multivessel disease (vs. no) (p = 0.014), and stent length ≥ 33 mm (vs. <33 mm) (p = 0.015) were linked with increased cumulative MACE risk (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Univariable Cox's proportional hazards regression analysis for cumulative MACE risk in STEMI patients

Items p Value HR 95% CI
Lower Upper
TNF‐α (high vs. low) 0.160 1.934 0.771 4.848
IL‐1β (high vs. low) 0.379 1.494 0.610 3.656
IL‐6 (high vs. low) 0.332 1.558 0.636 3.816
IL‐8 (high vs. low) 0.131 2.092 0.802 5.453
IL‐10 (low vs. high) 0.225 0.566 0.226 1.420
IL‐17A (high vs. low) 0.034 2.992 1.087 8.233
VCAM‐1 (high vs. low) 0.020 3.692 1.233 11.058
ICAM‐1 (high vs. low) 0.199 1.827 0.729 4.580
Age (≥65 years vs. <65 years) 0.186 1.813 0.751 4.379
Gender (male vs. female) 0.235 2.103 0.616 7.176
BMI (≥25 kg/m2 vs. <25 kg/m2) 0.262 1.669 0.682 4.086
Current smoker (yes vs. no) 0.348 1.522 0.633 3.660
History of hypertension (yes vs. no) 0.287 1.814 0.606 5.434
History of hyperlipidemia (yes vs. no) 0.224 1.732 0.714 4.200
History of diabetes mellitus (yes vs. no) 0.026 2.725 1.128 6.587
WBC (≥10 × 109/L vs. <10 × 109/L) 0.108 2.194 0.842 5.714
FBG (≥6.2 mmol/L vs. <6.2 mmol/L) 0.248 1.720 0.686 4.314
Scr (≥110 μmol/L vs. <110 μmol/L) 0.200 2.047 0.684 6.127
TG (≥1.7 mmol/L vs. <1.7 mmol/L) 0.378 1.512 0.603 3.792
TC (≥5.2 mmol/L vs. <5.2 mmol/L) 0.113 2.035 0.845 4.900
LDL‐C (≥3.4 mmol/L vs. <3.4 mmol/L) 0.210 1.777 0.723 4.365
HDL‐C(≤0.94 mmol/L vs. >0.94 mmol/L) 0.623 0.802 0.332 1.935
CRP (≥5 mg/L vs. <5 mg/L) 0.012 3.667 1.332 10.095
cTnI (≥4.2 ng/ml vs. <4.2 ng/ml) 0.040 2.895 1.051 7.976
CK‐MB (≥33.9 ng/ml vs. <33.9 ng/ml) 0.357 1.524 0.622 3.732
Symptom‐to‐balloon time (≥130 min vs. <130 min) 0.195 3.781 0.506 28.262
Multivessel disease (yes vs. no) 0.014 3.305 1.270 8.603
Culprit lesion
RCA Reference
LAD 0.609 0.785 0.311 1.983
LCX 0.224 0.387 0.083 1.791
Thrombus aspiration (yes vs. no) 0.332 0.485 0.112 2.094
Number of implanted stents (2 vs. 1) 0.569 1.321 0.507 3.442
Type of stent (everolimus‐eluting stent vs. sirolimus‐eluting stent) 0.377 0.609 0.203 1.829
Stent diameter (≥3.5 mm vs. <3.5 mm) 0.531 0.745 0.297 1.870
Stent length (≥33 mm vs. <33 mm) 0.015 4.616 1.352 15.757
Infarct size (≥24% vs. <24%) 0.169 1.907 0.760 4.785

The bold values represent the results with statistical significance, whose p value < 0.050.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CK‐MB, creatine kinase‐myocardial band; CRP, C‐reactive protein; cTnI, troponin I; FBG, fasting blood glucose; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; HR, hazard ratio; ICAM, intercellular adhesion molecule; IL, interleukin; LAD, left anterior descending artery; LCX, left circumflex artery; LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; MACE, major adverse cardiac events; RCA, right coronary artery; Scr, serum creatinine; STEMI, ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; VCAM, vascular cell adhesion molecule; WBC, white blood cell.

To further eliminate the potential confounding factors, the multivariable Cox's proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted, which exhibited that IL‐17A high (vs. low) (p = 0.034), VCAM‐1 high (vs. low) (p = 0.014), age ≥ 65 years (vs. <65 years) (p = 0.003), history of diabetes mellitus (vs. no) (p = 0.009), CRP ≥5 mg/L (vs. <5 mg/L) (p = 0.003), multivessel disease (vs. no) (p = 0.009), and stent length ≥ 33 mm (vs. <33 mm) (p = 0.036) were independently associated with increased cumulative MACE risk. Differently, the application of the everolimus‐eluting stent (vs. sirolimus‐eluting stent) (p = 0.034) was independently related to decreased MACE risk (Table 4).

TABLE 4.

Multivariable Cox's proportional hazards regression analysis for cumulative MACE risk in STEMI patients

Items p Value HR 95% CI
Lower Upper
IL‐17A (high vs. low) 0.034 3.127 1.091 8.965
VCAM‐1 (high vs. low) 0.014 4.533 1.355 15.160
Age (≥65 years vs. <65 years) 0.003 5.762 1.787 18.581
History of diabetes mellitus (yes vs. no) 0.009 4.605 1.460 14.528
CRP (≥5 mg/L vs. <5 mg/L) 0.003 7.372 1.985 27.384
Multivessel disease (yes vs. no) 0.009 4.142 1.427 12.024
Type of stent (everolimus‐eluting stent vs. sirolimus‐eluting stent) 0.034 0.276 0.084 0.906
Stent length (≥33 mm vs. <33 mm) 0.036 4.133 1.097 15.571

The bold values represent the results with statistical significance, whose p value < 0.050.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CRP, C‐reactive protein; cTnI, troponin I; HR, hazard ratio; IL, interleukin; MACE, major adverse cardiac events; STEMI, ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction; VCAM, vascular cell adhesion molecule.

4. DISCUSSION

Among the complicated etiologies of STEMI, the most widely accepted one is the plaque rupture‐caused coronary artery thrombosis. 2 When vascular walls are exposed to a proinflammation environment, the recruitment and accumulation of leukocytes are enhanced, which further promotes endothelial injury and the formation of thrombosis. 17 Subsequently, considering the essential role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of STEMI, the previous studies notice the abnormal level of several inflammatory cytokines in STEMI patients. 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 For instance, one previous study observes that serum TNF‐α and IL‐6 are beyond the normal range in STEMI patients who undergo PCI treatment. 20 Another study discloses the high level of TNF‐α, IL‐10, IL‐4, and IL‐1β in STEMI patients compared with the controls. 19 Partially in line with the previous studies, this study displayed that TNF‐α, IL‐8, IL‐17A, and VCAM‐1 level was elevated in STEMI patients compared to angina pectoris patients. The possible explanation was listed as follows: TNF‐α, IL‐8, IL‐17A, and VCAM‐1 were all proinflammatory cytokines, which accelerated endothelial dysfunction and increased atherosclerotic plaque burden. 12 , 22 Thus, the level of those inflammatory cytokines was elevated in STEMI patients compared with angina pectoris patients.

A few studies have been carried out to explore the correlation of some specific inflammatory cytokines with MACE risk in STEMI patients. 13 , 15 , 23 , 24 , 25 For example, one previous study indicates that the elevation of IL‐6 is correlated with high MACE risk in STEMI patients who undergo PCI therapy. 13 Another study finds the important role of VCAM‐1 in the occurrence of post‐PCI restenosis. 23 Nevertheless, the prognostic value of inflammatory cytokines lacks comprehensive study at present. The current study analyzed eight inflammatory cytokines, then found that IL‐17A high (vs. low) and VCAM‐1 high (vs. low) were independently associated with increased cumulative MACE risk in PCI‐treated STEMI patients. The probable reasons were as follows: (1) IL‐17A high level at an early stage aggravated the extent of left ventricular remodeling after STEMI, while the latter factor was closely linked with an increased risk of MACE (including heart failure, recurrent myocardial infarction, etc.). 26 , 27 Hence, elevated IL‐17A level was independently related to accelerated MACE risk in STEMI patients. (2) Concerning VCAM‐1 (also a member of inflammatory cytokine), it mediated the adhesion of vascular endothelial cells and leukocytes, which was closely associated with vascular endothelial injury and further exacerbated atherosclerotic lesions. 28 , 29 , 30 Additionally, VCAM‐1 contributed to trimethylamine n‐oxide, then enhanced arterial thrombosis and increased the occurrence of post‐PCI restenosis. 31 , 32 , 33 Combining the above two aspects, VCAM‐1 high (vs. low) was independently correlated with elevated MACE risk in PCI‐treated STEMI patients. Besides, it is observed that the previous studies notice that IL‐6 and TNF‐α could serve as a prognostic indicator in STEMI patients, while their prognostic value lacked statistical significance in this study, which might be explained by that: the previous studies only focused on a single or a few inflammatory cytokines (no more than three) inflammatory cytokines, while this study comprehensively investigated eight inflammatory cytokines, and utilized the multivariable Cox's proportional hazards regression analysis to eliminate the interinfluence among inflammatory cytokines. Hence, some different findings between this study and the previous study were noticed.

Some limitations existed in this study. Firstly, the determination of inflammatory cytokines at multiple time points after treatment was also necessary for further studies to monitor disease progression. Secondly, the median (IQR) follow‐up duration was 15.0 (9.0–24.0) months, ranging from 1.0 to 39.0 months, and the total 3‐year MACE rate was 17.4%; hence, the long‐term predicting value of inflammatory cytokines for MACE risk deserved further study. Thirdly, patients in this study all received primary PCI, while the inflammatory cytokine level and their prognostic value remained unclear in recurrent patients who underwent PCI retreatment. Fourthly, patients with electrocardiographic changes in left bundle branch block of new onset were not included in this study according to the enrollment criteria, while it could also be regarded as STEMI presentation. Fifthly, the comparison of inflammatory cytokine levels between PCI‐treated and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)‐treated STEMI patients was undetected in this study, which deserved further investigation.

In summary, IL‐17A and VCAM‐1 high level independently correlate with elevated MACE risk in STEMI patients, which might serve as useful indicators in assistance of STEMI diagnosis and identifying patients with poor prognosis.

FUNDING INFORMATION

This study was funded by Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (No. H2021201024) and Foundation of AffiliatedHospital of Hebei University (No. 2021Z011).

CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

Each patient or family member signed the informed consent.

Supporting information

Figure S1

Table S1

Table S2

Zhang J, Xu H, Yao M, Jia H, Cong H. The abnormal level and prognostic potency of multiple inflammatory cytokines in PCI‐treated STEMI patients. J Clin Lab Anal. 2022;36:e24730. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24730

Jing Zhang and Huichuan Xu contributed equally to this work.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Vogel B, Claessen BE, Arnold SV, et al. ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Zijlstra F, Suryapranata H, de Boer MJ. ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction: historical perspective and new horizons. Neth Heart J. 2020;28(Suppl 1):93‐98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Zhou T, Li X, Lu Y, et al. Changes in ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction hospitalisations in China from 2011 to 2015. Open Heart. 2021;8(2):e001666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Partow‐Navid R, Prasitlumkum N, Mukherjee A, Varadarajan P, Pai RG. Management of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in different settings. Int J Angiol. 2021;30(1):67‐75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Frank M, Sanders C, Berry BP. Evaluation and management of ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction in the emergency department. Emerg Med Pract. 2021;23(1):1‐28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Frampton J, Devries JT, Welch TD, Gersh BJ. Modern management of ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2020;45(3):100393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Satilmisoglu MH, Gul M, Ozyilmaz S, Cizgici AY. Real‐life data for major adverse cardiac events in patients with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction prasugrel versus ticagrelor. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2021;72(4):563‐569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Nozari Y, Parsa M, Jalali A, Ariannejad H, Shafiee A. Mean platelet volume and major adverse cardiac events following percutaneous coronary intervention. Arch Iran Med. 2019;22(4):198‐203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Pedro‐Botet J, Climent E, Benaiges D. Atherosclerosis and inflammation New Ttherapeutic Aapproaches. Med Clin (Barc). 2020;155(6):256‐262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Libby P. Inflammation during the life cycle of the atherosclerotic plaque. Cardiovasc Res. 2021;117(13):2525‐2536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Oikonomou E, Leopoulou M, Theofilis P, et al. A link between inflammation and thrombosis in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: clinical and therapeutic implications. Atherosclerosis. 2020;309:16‐26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Garza‐Reyes MG, Mora‐Ruiz MD, Chavez‐Sanchez L, et al. Effect of Interleukin‐17 in the activation of monocyte subsets in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Immunol Res. 2020;2020:5692829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Scarlatescu AI, Micheu MM, Popa‐Fotea N, et al. IL‐6, IL‐1RA and Resistin as predictors of left ventricular remodelling and major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(2):266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Seropian IM, Sonnino C, Van Tassell BW, Biasucci LM, Abbate A. Inflammatory markers in ST‐elevation acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2016;5(4):382‐395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Liu K, Tang Q, Zhu X, Yang X. IL‐37 increased in patients with acute coronary syndrome and associated with a worse clinical outcome after ST‐segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Clin Chim Acta. 2017;468:140‐144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hong D, Choi KH, Song YB, et al. Prognostic implications of post‐percutaneous coronary intervention neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio on infarct size and clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis‐No longer a theory. Clin Chem. 2021;67(1):131‐142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Falcao RA, Christopher S, Oddi C, et al. Interleukin‐10 in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2014;172(1):e6‐e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Luo X, Zhao C, Wang S, Jia H, Yu B. TNF‐alpha is a novel biomarker for predicting plaque rupture in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Inflamm Res. 2022;15:1889‐1898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kehmeier ES, Lepper W, Kropp M, et al. TNF‐alpha, myocardial perfusion and function in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction and primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Clin Res Cardiol. 2012;101(10):815‐827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Zykov MV, Barbarash OL, Kashtalap VV, Kutikhin AG, Barbarash LS. Interleukin‐12 serum level has prognostic value in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. Heart Lung. 2016;45(4):336‐340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Abbate A, Trankle CR, Buckley LF, et al. Interleukin‐1 blockade inhibits the acute inflammatory response in patients with ST‐segment‐elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(5):e014941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hayek A, Paccalet A, Mechtouff L, et al. Kinetics and prognostic value of soluble VCAM‐1 in ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2021;9(2):493‐501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kristono GA, Holley AS, Hally KE, et al. An IL‐6‐IL‐8 score derived from principal component analysis is predictive of adverse outcome in acute myocardial infarction. Cytokine X. 2020;2(4):100037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Tollefsen IM, Shetelig C, Seljeflot I, Eritsland J, Hoffmann P, Andersen GO. High levels of interleukin‐6 are associated with final infarct size and adverse clinical events in patients with STEMI. Open Heart. 2021;8(2):e001869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Mora‐Ruiz MD, Blanco‐Favela F, Chavez Rueda AK, Legorreta‐Haquet MV, Chavez‐Sanchez L. Role of interleukin‐17 in acute myocardial infarction. Mol Immunol. 2019;107:71‐78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Minana G, Nunez J, Bayes‐Genis A, et al. ST2 and left ventricular remodeling after ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction: a cardiac magnetic resonance study. Int J Cardiol. 2018;270:336‐342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Postadzhiyan AS, Tzontcheva AV, Kehayov I, Finkov B. Circulating soluble adhesion molecules ICAM‐1 and VCAM‐1 and their association with clinical outcome, troponin T and C‐reactive protein in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Clin Biochem. 2008;41(3):126‐133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Zeng L, Zhang C, Zhu Y, et al. Hypofunction of circulating endothelial progenitor cells and aggravated severity in elderly male patients with non‐ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: its association with systemic inflammation. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:687590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Troncoso MF, Ortiz‐Quintero J, Garrido‐Moreno V, et al. VCAM‐1 as a predictor biomarker in cardiovascular disease. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2021;1867(9):166170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Li J, Wu J, Zhang M, Zheng Y. Dynamic changes of innate lymphoid cells in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction and its association with clinical outcomes. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Thayse K, Kindt N, Laurent S, Carlier S. VCAM‐1 target in non‐invasive imaging for the detection of atherosclerotic plaques. Biology (Basel). 2020;9(11):368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Witkowski M, Witkowski M, Friebel J, et al. Vascular endothelial tissue factor contributes to trimethylamine N‐oxide‐enhanced arterial thrombosis. Cardiovasc Res. 2021;118:2367‐2384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1

Table S1

Table S2

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES