Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery logoLink to Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery
. 2021 Jul 2;74(Suppl 2):1566–1570. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02700-y

Olfactory Fossa Evaluation as a Maxillary Sinus Development Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Bahadır Sancar 1, Suayip Burak Duman 2,✉
PMCID: PMC9702288  PMID: 36452797

Abstract

In our study, we aimed to evaluate the risk of skull base perforation during endoscopic sinus surgery in individuals with hypoplasic maxillary sinuses using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). We included 52 patients with bilateral maxillary sinus hypoplasia and 52 patients with normal maxillary sinus in the study. Reviewing paranasal CBCT scans, we noted the olfactory fossa depths and lateral lamella lengths of all the groups and compared between the hypoplasia groups and the control group. Compared the maxillary hypoplasia sinus individuals with the control group, both the olfactory fossa depths and the lateral lamina length were different in the maxillary hypoplasic individuals. In individuals with hypoplasic maxillary sinus, the olfactory fossa depth and the lateral lamina length values are higher, which increases the risk of complications in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Keywords: Lateral lamella length, Olfactory fossa depth, Hypoplasic maxillary sinus, Endoscopic sinus surgery

Introduction

Endoscopic approach in paranasal sinus surgery is a method frequently preferred by otolaryngologists due to low postoperative morbidity. Major complications should be avoided as these surgeries are generally performed to improve the quality of life of the individual [1–3]. Anatomical variations should always be kept in mind before the procedure, and tomography images of the region should be examined in detail to minimize the complication rate that may occur. Otherwise, complications will be inevitable. The most serious complication encountered in the region is the trauma of the anterior skull base during the procedure and subsequent formation of CSF fistulas. The most common site of this complication is the cribriform plate lateral lamella. Individuals with deeper olfactory fossa (OF) also have longer lateral lamina (LL), which causes iatrogenic skull base injuries [4]. In particular, the region where the anterior ethmoid artery penetrates the skull base is considered to be the area that has the lowest resistance of the entire skull base [5]. In the classification made by Keros in the early 1960s and still in use today, Keros divided the olfactory fossa into three categories according to OF depth [4]. Kainz et al. [6] showed that the risk of injury to the anterior skull base during surgery is increased in Keros type III. Therefore, developmental disorders of the paranasal sinuses are an important factor to be considered in endoscopic sinus surgery. The maxillary sinus is the largest in terms of volume among paranasal sinuses, and the maxillofacial region can be examined in detail in most Cone Beam Computed Tomograph (CBCT) scans. Maxillary sinus hypoplasia (MSH) were reported in 1.73% –10.4% of patients with sinus symptoms [7–11].

CBCT is generally referred to as dentistry in the literature and stands out with its price, ergonomics and lower radiation emission compared to conventional tomography. CBCT’s became important for the Otorhinolaryngology and Plastic Surgery fields as well as they provide information about the head and neck region and their image quality increases day by day[12].

We did not find a study in the literature that measured the OF depth and LL length with CBCT in individuals with MSH. In this retrospective/archival, radio-anatomical study, we aimed to investigate the olfactory fossa depths and lateral lamella lengths of patients with MSH in comparison to the controls with normal maxillary sinuses. This study is significant in that it is based on the purpose of creating a morphological model to prevent injury to the relevant structures during endoscopic sinus surgeries in individuals with MSH.

Materials and Methods

In this retrospective study, we evaluated CBCT images of 104 patients (52 patients with maxillary sinus hypoplasia, 52 patients with normal maxillary sinus) who applied to us for different reasons. The scans of these 104 patients were retrospectively retrieved from the database of the Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Dentistry Faculty of University. The study protocol was approved by the Clinical Ethics Committee of Inonu University (approval no. 2020/949). CBCT images were acquired with the patients in the standard supine position (scanning time, 14–18 s, exposure time 3.6 s, kVp = 110, mA = 1–20; voxel size 0.2mm3) using the same device (NewTom 5G, QR Verona, Verona, Italy). All images were analyzed with the aid of Quantitative Radiology (QR) NNT version 2.21 imaging software. All CBCT scans were evaluated by the same observer (S.B.D.). The intra class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine intrarater reliability. ICC values were 0.92 for the classifications of the right side and 0.90 for the classifications of the left side. The exclusion criteria for the all group included poor image quality with severe artefacts, a systemic bone disease of the mid-facial region, craniofacial syndrome, a cleft lip or palate, history of sinus surgery, previous orthognathic surgery, and age < 18 years.

Study Design

We accepted MSH as maxillary sinus with half or less of the maximum horizontal or vertical linear dimension of the orbit on the same side as described by Sirikçi et al. [10]. Only bilateral MSH patients were examined. We investigated the coronal CBCT scans in which the crista galli, perpendicular plate and OF were clear to measure OF depth and LL length. As described by Keros [4] OF was measured and classified according to the position of the cribriform plate concerned to the ethmoid roof (Fig. 1). The measurements were classified into types I, II, and III for both sides. Types variants are accepted as follows;

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Showing olfactory fossa depth according to keros classification a Keros I b Keros II c Keros III

Type I-OF depth lower than 3.0 mm.

Type II-OF depth between 4.0 and 7.0 mm.

Type III-OF depth higher than 7.0 mm.

We also measured LL length which from horizontal cribriform plate and fovea ethmoidalis between the cribriform plate as the lateral boundary (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Showing lateral lamina length measurements

Results

In the study, 50% of the cases are control and 50% are experimental group. The groups do not differ according to gender (p = 0.382). While 65.4% of the cases are women, 34.6% are men. (Table 1).

Table 1.

Frequency distributions

Normal (n = 26) Hypoplasic Maxillary Sinus (n = 26) Total (n = 52) p
Female 15 (57.7)** 19 (73.1) 34 (65.4) 0.382
Male 11 (42.3) 7 (26.9) 18 (34.6)

*Chi-square test **Frequency (Percentage)

Mean age value does not differ according to the groups (p = 0.694). While the mean age value of the control group was 34.4, it was 35.9 in the experimental group. (Table 2).

Table 2.

Comparison of ages by groups

Mean Standard deviation Minimum Maximum p*
Normal 34.4 14.7 19.0 65.0 0.694
Hypoplasic Maxillary Sinus 35.9 12.5 20.0 60.0
Total 35.1 13.6 19.0 65.0

* Independent samples t test

The mean value of the OF depth varies according to the groups (p < 0.001). While the mean value of OF depth in the control group was 3.54, it was obtained as 5.53 in the experimental group.

The mean value of LL length differs according to the groups (p < 0.001). While the mean LL length value was 4.57 in the control group, it was 5.61 in the experimental group. In the control group, mean value of OF depth does not differ according to gender (p = 0.243). While the average value of OF in women was 3.38, it was obtained as 3.76 in men. The mean LL length value does not differ according to gender (p = 0.503). While the mean length value of LL was 4.46 in women, it was 4.71 in men. In the experimental group, the mean value of OF depth does not differ according to gender (p = 0.527). While the mean value of OF in women was 5.65, it was obtained as 5.21 in men. The mean LL length value does not differ according to gender (p = 0.412). While the mean LL length value was 5.77 in women, it was obtained as 5.19 in men (Table 3).

Table 3.

Comparisons by groups

n Normal (n = 52) Hypoplasic Maxillary Sinus (n = 52) p*
Mean ± ss Mean (min–max) Mean ± ss Mean (min–max)
Olfactor Fossa Depth Female 68 3.38 ± 0.89 3.48 (1.8–4.96) 5.65 ± 1.57 5.5 (2.2–9.4)
Male 36 3.76 ± 1.43 3.66 (1.7–47.04) 5.21 ± 2.39 4.85 (1.5–9.4)
Total 104 3.54 ± 1.15 3.51 (1.74–7.04) 5.53 ± 1.81 5.5 (1.5–9.4)  < 0.001
p 0.243 0.527
Lamina Height Female 68 4.46 ± 0.91 4.36 (2.3–6.06) 5.77 ± 1.14 5.61 (3.3–9.08)
Male 36 4.71 ± 1.57 4.97 (1.89–7.71) 5.19 ± 2.46 5.4 (1–9.4)
Total 104 4.57 ± 1.23 4.6 (1.89–7.71) 5.61 ± 1.6 5.55 (1–9.4)  < 0.001
p* 0.503 0.412

Bold values indicate significant difference at p < 0.05

*Independent samples t test

Statistical Method

The data were analyzed with IBM SPSS V23. The compliance with normal distribution was examined with Kolmogorov Smirnov and Shapiro Wilk. Independent samples t test was used to compare normally distributed data. The data conforming to normal distribution were presented as mean ± standard deviation. The -square test was used to compare categorical data. Categorical data were presented as frequency (percentage). The level of significance was taken as p < 0.050.

Discussion

In endoscopic sinus surgeries, the importance of OF anatomy, which includes the ethmoidal roof and cribriform plate, is increasing day by day because of the skull base injuries that may occur due to its highly fragile structure [13–15]. There are studies in the literature showing that the probability of iatrogenic injury increases as the OF depth increases [16, 17] Considering the studies examining the relationship between anatomical variations and OF depth, it was shown that there is an increase in OF depth in individuals with excessive vertical facial growth [18]. However, Bayrak et al. [19] explained that Nasal Septum Deviation has no effect on OF depth. When we examined the relationship between maxillary sinus development and OF depth, we observed an increase in OF depth in MSH individuals.

The LL of cribriform plate is the thinnest (0.05 mm) region of the skull base, which makes the LL length important in terms of the formation of iatrogenic CSF fistulas during the endoscopic surgeries of the region [20, 21]. According to Solares et al. [22], as LL height increases, the probability of its penetration into the skull base increases. In a study examining the relationship between LL length and Keros, a correlation was found between them [23].

Although computed tomography is stated as the gold standard in the evaluation of paranasal sinuses [24], CBCT, which was started to be used in the 1990s, has advantages such as excellent and detailed resolution, low radiation and low cost [25, 26]. CBCT was found useful for evaluating the OF and anterior skull base prior to nasal and paranasal sinus surgeries [13, 25]. In this study, OF depth and LL length were evaluated in MSH individuals using CBCT images. Keros classification [4] was used to evaluate the OF depth. In the classification created by Keros according to his research on 450 skulls, type I has a depth of 1–3 mm and is seen at 12%, type II has a depth of 4–7 mm and is seen in 70%, type III has a depth of 7 mm and more and is seen at 18%. Type III is the most risky group and is called “dangerous ethmoid”[6, 27]. The distribution of the study population according to Keros classification is shown in Table 4.

Table 4.

Keros classification of individuals in our study

Keros 1 n (%) Keros 2 n (%) Keros 3 n (%)
Hypoplasic maxilla 14 (13.4) 74 (71.1) 16 (15.3)
Normal 78 (75) 24 (23) 2 (2)

According to the results of our study, both OF depth and LL length values are higher in patients with MSH compared to individuals with normal maxillary sinuses. Kayabasi et al. [14] measured the mean OF depth 5.7 mm in MSH individuals and 4.5 mm in individuals with normal maxillary sinus (P < 0.001). In the same study, they measured LL length values and found them higher in individuals with maxillary sinus hypopalsia (P < 0.001). These results are consistent with the results of our study. Another study measuring LL length found it 3.6 ± 0.8 mm [22].

Angle formed by the lateral lamella of the cribriform plate (LLCP) and the horizontal plane passing through the cribriform plate may play an important role in assessing the risks of endoscopic sinus surgery [21]. The fact that the relevant angle was not measured in this study can be considered as a limitation of our study. Moreover, 2-dimensional evaluation of whether the maxillary sinus, which is a 3-dimensional structure, is hypoplasic or not can be considered as another limitation.

Conclusion

Considering the advantages before endoscopic sinus surgery, CBCT devices can be used instead of CT devices. In individuals with MSH, OF is deeper and LL is longer, and the surgeon should consider that the risk of skull base injury may increase in individuals with hypoplasic maxillary sinuses.

Funding

This study was not funded by any organization.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This research was approved by Inonu University Scientific Research and publication ethics committee numbered 2020/949.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Anderhuber W, Walch C, Fock C. Configuration of ethmoid roof in children 0–14 years of age. Laryngorhinootologie. 2001;80(9):509–511. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-17083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Meloni F, Mini R, Rovasio S, Stomeo F, Teatini G. Anatomic variations of surgical importance in ethmoid labyrinth and sphenoid sinus. A study of radiological anatomy. Surg Radiol Anatomy. 1992;14(1):65–70. doi: 10.1007/BF01628046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Arslan H, Aydınlıoğlu A, Bozkurt M, Egeli E. Anatomic variations of the paranasal sinuses: CT examination for endoscopic sinus surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx. 1999;26(1):39–48. doi: 10.1016/S0385-8146(98)00024-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Keros P. On the practical value of differences in the level of the lamina cribrosa of the ethmoid. Zeitschrift fur Laryngologie, Rhinologie, Otologie und ihre Grenzgebiete. 1962;41:809–813. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Souza SA, de Souza MMA, Idagawa M, Wolosker ÂMB, Ajzen SA. Computed tomography assessment of the ethmoid roof: a relevant region at risk in endoscopic sinus surgery. Skull Base. 2008;6:8–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kainz J, Stammberger H. The roof of the anterior ethmoid: a locus minoris resistentiae in the skull base. Laryngol Rhinol Otol. 1988;67(4):142–149. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-998473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bassiouny A, Newlands WJ, Ali H, Zaki Y. Maxillary sinus hypoplasia and superior orbital fissure asymmetry. Laryngoscope. 1982;92(4):441–448. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198204000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Karmody C. Developmental anomalies of the maxillary sinus. Trans Am Acad Opthamol Otolayngol. 1977;84:723–728. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bolger WE, Woodruff WW, Jr, Morehead J, Parsons DS. Maxillary sinus hypoplasia: classification and description of associated uncinate process hypoplasia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;103(5):759–765. doi: 10.1177/019459989010300516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sirikci A, Bayazit Y, Bayram M, Kanlikana M. A new approach to the classification of maxillary sinus hypoplasia with relevant clinical implications. Surg Radiol Anat. 2001;22(5–6):243–247. doi: 10.1007/s00276-000-0243-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Erdem T, Aktas D, Erdem G, Miman MC, Ozturan O. Maxillary sinus hypoplasia. Rhinology. 2002;40(3):150–153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kyriakou Y, Kolditz D, Langner O, Krause J, Kalender W. Digital volume tomography (DVT) and multislice spiral CT (MSCT): an objective examination of dose and image quality. RoFo: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. 2010;183(2):144–153. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Costa ALF, Paixão AK, Gonçalves BC, et al. Cone beam computed tomography-based anatomical assessment of the olfactory fossa. Int J Dent. 2019;2019:4134260. doi: 10.1155/2019/4134260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kayabasi S, Hizli O, Ozkan D. Does paranasal sinus development affect olfactory fossa depth and lateral lamella length? Laryngoscope. 2019;129(11):2458–2463. doi: 10.1002/lary.27940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Adeel M, Ikram M, Rajput MSA, Arain A, Khattak YJ. Asymmetry of lateral lamella of the cribriform plate: a software-based analysis of coronal computed tomography and its clinical relevance in endoscopic sinus surgery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013;35(9):843–847. doi: 10.1007/s00276-013-1106-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Siedek V, Pilzweger E, Betz C, Berghaus A, Leunig A. Complications in endonasal sinus surgery: a 5-year retrospective study of 2,596 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270(1):141–148. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-1973-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Başak S, Akdilli A, Karaman CZ, Kunt T. Assessment of some important anatomical variations and dangerous areas of the paranasal sinuses by computed tomography in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;55(2):81–89. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5876(00)00362-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Calvo-Henríquez C, Ruano-Ravina A, Martinez-Capoccioni G, et al. Is an increase in the depth of the olfactory fossa caused by excessive vertical facial growth? A Radiol Study B-ENT. 2020;16(1):25–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bayrak S, Belgin CA, Orhan K. Evaluation of the relationship between olfactory fossa measurements and nasal septum deviation for endoscopic sinus surgery. J Craniofacial Surg. 2020;31(3):801–803. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ohnishi T, Yanagisawa E. Lateral lamella of the cribriform plate—an important high-risk area in endoscopic sinus surgery. Ear Nose Throat J. 1995;74(10):688–690. doi: 10.1177/014556139507401006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gera R, Mozzanica F, Karligkiotis A, et al. Lateral lamella of the cribriform plate, a keystone landmark: proposal for a novel classification system. Rhinology. 2018;56(1):65–72. doi: 10.4193/Rhin17.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Solares CA, Lee WT, Batra PS, Citardi MJ. Lateral lamella of the cribriform plate: software-enabled computed tomographic analysis and its clinical relevance in skull base surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(3):285–289. doi: 10.1001/archotol.134.3.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nair S, Ibrahim A. The Importance of Cribriform-Lamella Angle in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;73(1):66–71. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-02171-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lozano-Carrascal N, Salomó-Coll O, Gehrke SA, Calvo-Guirado JL, Hernández-Alfaro F, Gargallo-Albiol J. Radiological evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomy: A cross-sectional study of 300 patients. Annal Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger. 2017;214:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2017.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Güldner C, Diogo I, Bernd E, et al. Visualization of anatomy in normal and pathologic middle ears by cone beam CT. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(2):737–742. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4345-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Güldner C, Diogo I, Leicht J, et al. Reduction of radiation dosage in visualization of paranasal sinuses in daily routine. Int J Otolaryngol. 2017;2017:1–5. doi: 10.1155/2017/3104736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ahmet S, Hilal G, Abdullah A, Yucel G, Ozan T, Emre K. Sex-Related Changes in the Configuration of the Ethmoid Roof and Evaluation of Asymmetry. EC Clinical Experimental Anatomy. 2018;1:83–92. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES