Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2022 Nov 25;75(2):91–98. doi: 10.1007/s00251-022-01281-6

Age-dependent effect of the IFIH1/MDA5 gene variants on the risk of critical COVID-19

María G Muñiz-Banciella 1, Guillermo M Albaiceta 2,3,4,5,6, Laura Amado-Rodríguez 2,3,4,5,6, Estefanía Salgado del Riego 2, Inés López Alonso 3,5,6, Cecilia López-Martínez 3,5,6, Paula Martín-Vicente 3,5,6, Marta García-Clemente 3,4,7, Tamara Hermida-Valverde 7, Ana I Enríquez-Rodriguez 7, Cristina Hernández-González 7, Elías Cuesta-Llavona 1,3, Victoria Alvarez 1,3, Juan Gómez 1,3, Eliecer Coto 1,3,4,
PMCID: PMC9702716  PMID: 36434151

Abstract

MDA5, encoded by the IFIH1gene, is a cytoplasmic sensor of viral RNAs that triggers interferon (IFN) antiviral responses. Common and rare IFIH1 variants have been associated with the risk of type 1 diabetes and other immune-mediated disorders, and with the outcome of viral diseases. Variants associated with reduced IFN expression would increase the risk for severe viral disease. The MDA5/IFN pathway would play a critical role in the response to SARS-CoV-2 infection mediating the extent and severity of COVID-19. Here, we genotyped a cohort of 477 patients with critical ICU COVID-19 (109 death) for three IFIH1 functional variants: rs1990760 (p.Ala946Thr), rs35337543 (splicing variant, intron 8 + 1G > C), and rs35744605 (p.Glu627Stop). The main finding of our study was a significant increased frequency of rs1990760 C-carriers in early-onset patients (< 65 years) (p = 0.01; OR = 1.64, 95%CI = 1.18–2.43). This variant was also increased in critical vs. no-ICU patients and in critical vs. asymptomatic controls. The rs35744605 C variant was associated with increased blood IL6 levels at ICU admission. The rare rs35337543 splicing variant showed a trend toward protection from early-onset critical COVID-19. In conclusion, IFIH1 variants associated with reduced gene expression and lower IFN response might contribute to develop critical COVID-19 with an age-dependent effect.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00251-022-01281-6.

Keywords: IFIH1/MDA5, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Genetic association

Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 exhibits a wide range of manifestations, from asymptomatic to mild–moderate symptoms and severe pneumonia with hospitalization (Luo et al. 2022). Critical patients require life support in the ICU and are at high risk of death, with several well recognized life-threatening risk factors such as advanced age, male sex, and pre-existing cardiovascular diseases (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipaemia) (Portuondo-Jimenez et al. 2022). In addition to these, the genetic background of each individual would contribute to the susceptibility to develop a severe manifestation of COVID-19 (Ellinghaus et al. 2020; COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative 2021; Kousathanas et al. 2022; Coto et al. 2021; Nakanishi et al. 2021; David et al. 2022).

The pathological hallmark of COVID-19 is an exacerbated inflammatory host response known as cytokine storm (Nile et al. 2020). This drives the recruitment and accumulation of leukocytes in tissues, causing acute respiratory distress syndrome (Hadjadj et al. 2020). Critically ill patients showed lower antiviral and a greater inflammatory responses, which exacerbates the damage to the lung tissue (Wang et al. 2020; Alon et al. 2021).

MDA5 (melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5) is a receptor dsRNA helicase encoded by the IFIH1 gene. MDA5 is a cytoplasmic sensor of viral RNAs that triggers interferon (IFN) innate immune antiviral responses (Dias Junior et al. 2019; Sampaio et al. 2021; Thorne et al. 2021; Yin et al. 2021). Thus, the loss of MDA5 might impairs the antiviral response increasing the risk of severe infection (Kim et al. 2014; Asgari et al. 2017; Lamborn et al. 2017). Moreover, anti-MDA5 antibodies have been reported in COVID-19 patients and high levels correlated with severe disease and unfavorable outcomes (Wang et al. 2021). In opposition to the increased risk of viral disease associated with the loss of MDA5, IFIH1 gain of function variants would result in the over activation of inflammatory pathways and increased risk of several autoimmune and inflammatory diseases (Rice et al. 20142020; Tonutti et al. 2022).

In reference to the COVID-19, MDA5 is the main sensor of SARS-CoV-2 in lung epithelial cells and would regulate the early IFN response to inhibit viral replication. MDA5 has been associated with the extent of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the risk of developing severe-critical COVID -19 (Sampaio et al. 2021; Thorne et al. 2021; Yin et al. 2021; Rebendenne et al. 2021; Amado-Rodriguez et al. 2022).

The IFIH1 gene has several common polymorphisms that have been associated with the risk of immune-mediated diseases. Among others, rs1990760 is a missense change (p.Ala946Thr) associated with type 1 diabetes and other autoimmune diseases (Liu et al. 2009; Cen et al. 2013; Gorman et al. 2017; Borysewicz-Sańczyk et al. 2020; Shapiro et al. 2021).This change would result in differences in the ATPase activity due to conformational alteration of the protein (Funabiki et al. 2014). Mutations that inhibit ATPase activity are capable of enhancing the IFN-I (IFNβ) response (Bamming and Horvath 2009). In addition to the structural change caused by the p.Ala946Thr that could affect the MDA5 function, this SNP might also impact the IFIH1 expression. Most of the reported studies described increased basal MDA5 levels for the p.946Thr autoimmune-risk allele, with higher expression of IFN (Downes et al. 2010). While this allele might be detrimental for autoimmune disorders, it could be also protective against viral disease by enhancing the early innate immune response (Gorman et al. 2017). In this context, allele rs1990760 T was found at reduced frequency in patients with chronic hepatitis C compared to uninfected controls and was also associated with spontaneous clearance of HCV infection (Hoffmann et al. 2015).

In addition to common gene polymorphisms, IFIH1 has several rare deleterious variants present at frequencies > 1% in Europeans. The rs35337543 is a putative splicing variant (c.1641 + 1G > C) that would result in the skipping of exon 8 removing 39 amino acids of the helicase domain (Asgari et al. 2017; Forbester and Humphreys 2021). This variant would be protective for T1D, but as a risk factor for recurrent viral infection (Asgari et al. 2017; Nejentsev et al. 2009; Mine et al. 2020). The rs35744605 (c.1879 G > T) introduces a premature stop codon (p.Glu627Stop) and would result in the loss of the 399 C-terminal amino acids of MDA5. This variant is present in approximately 1% of the individuals of European ancestry, and was associated with decreased risk of T1D and increased risk for recurrent viral infection (Asgari et al. 2017; Downes et al. 2010; Chistiakov et al. 2010).

Our aim was to determine the impact of the IFIH1 variants in the risk of critical COVID-19 and death. For this purpose, we studied critical (ICU), less severe patients and asymptomatic individuals from a Spanish population.

Methods

Patients

This study was approved by the Ethical Research Committee of Asturias and the participants (patients and controls) or their next of kin gave their informed consent. All the participants were from the region of Asturias (Northern Spain, total population one million, 25% > 65 years). Individuals from non-European ancestry were not included, and none of the patients had been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. We studied 477 COVID-19 critical patients who required admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Hospital Universitario Central Asturias during the period March 2020 to July 2021. During the study period, dexamethasone was added to critical COVID-19 treatment based on published trials (WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies REACT Working Groupet al. 2020). For this reason, most of the ICU patients who did not receive this treatment (N = 58) were hospitalized during the first pandemic weeks.

The less severe group consisted of patients (N = 431) with COVID-19 symptoms who required hospital admission with no need for ICU. We also studied 195 individuals from the general population with the same age distribution as the patients. These controls were followed during the study period and did not have COVID-19 symptoms, although the absence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was not confirmed by serological tests.

Genotyping

The DNA was obtained from whole blood leukocytes and all the individuals were genotyped for the IFIH1 polymorphisms with real-time PCR Taqman assays (Fisher scientific): rs35337543, assay id C_25985625_10; rs35744605, assay id C_25982959_10; rs1990760, C_2780299_30 (suppl. Fig. 1). The quality of the genotyping method was determined by sequencing PCR fragments with different genotypes (suppl. Figs. 24).

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was performed to determine the association between the study variants and the disease onset age and the risk of death among the critical ICU COVID-19 patients. Patients aged < 65 or ≥ 65 years were classified as early and late onset, respectively. We also compared the critical ICU with non-critical patients and healthy controls. All the patients´ values (age, sex, cardiovascular comorbidities, IL-6, corticosteroid treatment) were obtained from the clinical history at ICU admission. For the blood IL-6 levels, the ICU patients were categorized as > 70 and ≤ 70 pg/mL based on previous reports that considered this cut-off value as significant predictor of COVID-19 mortality (Del Valle et al. 2020).

All the data (including the genotypes) were annotated in an excel file and the statistical analysis was performed by logistic regression with the linear generalized model in the R-free software (www.r-project.org). The post hoc power was calculated based on the observed SNP frequencies in the groups.

Results

The rs1990760 (p.Ala946Thr) CC and CT COVID-19 critical patients showed almost identical mean onset ages (63.09 ± 11.57 and 63.44 ± 12.84 years, respectively), and lower than the TT patients (65.80 ± 11.36 years). We thus concluded that allele C (p.Ala946) was associated with a significant lower onset age with a dominant effect (CC + CT) compared to TT (63.39 ± 12.39 vs. 65.8011.36 years; p = 0.04). Early-onset critical patients (< 65 years) showed a significantly higher frequency of the C allele compared to late-onset patients, with a dominant effect (CC + CT vs. TT, p = 0.01) (Table 1). Moreover, there was a gradient in increased frequency of C-patients according to the age intervals, ranging from 79% in ≤ 50 years to 63% in > 71 years (Fig. 1). The power of the study for the ICU early vs. late onset was 75%. The C-carrier status was associated with early-onset critical COVID-19 after multiple regression analysis (p = 0.03) (Table 2).

Table 1.

Main characteristics of the early onset (< 65 years vs. ≥ 65) in the critical ICU COVID-19 cases. For the rs1990760, both CC and CT genotypes were increased in the < 65 years old patients, and we considered a C-dominant (CC + CT) effect on the risk of early-onset critical disease

ICU < 65
N = 235
ICU ≥ 65
N = 242
p-value
Male 167 (71%) 178 (69%) 0.12
Corticosteroid, NO 18 (8%) 40 (16%)
Corticosteroid, YES 217 (92%) 202 (84%) 0.001
BMI ≥ 30 121 (52%) 123 (51%) 0.89
Hypertension* 98 (42%) 164 (68%)  < 0.001
Hypercolesterolemia* 78 (33%) 147 (61%)  < 0.001
Diabetes* 28 (12%) 75 (31%)  < 0.001
Death 25 (10%) 80 (33%)  < 0.001

IL-6 pg/mL**

median (IQR)

40

(12–109)

46

(17–125)

-

IL-6 > 70 pg/mL

(≤ 70)

106 (50%)

(+ 105)

116 (53%)

 + 102

0.54

rs1990760 C > T#

(p.Ala946Thr)

   CC 59 (25%) 49 (20%) 0.01
   CT 112 (48%) 102 (42%)
   TT 64 (27%) 91 (37%) -
   Allele C (p.Ala946) 0.49 0.41 0.02
Eur: C = 0.36–0.40 - - -

rs35337543

int8 + 1G > C

   GG 231 (98%) 231 (95%) 0.09
   GC 4 (2%) 11 (5%) -

   Allele C

Eur: C = 0.02

0.01 0.02 0.07
- - -

rs35744605 G > T

(p.Glu627Stop)

   GG 230 (98%) 238 (98%) 0.70
   GT 5 (2%) 4 (2%)

   Allele T

Eur: T = 0.01

0.01 0.01 0.48
- - -

Eur, allele frequencies among Europeans (www.ensembl.org)

#CC + CT vs. TT

*Data obtained from the electronic clinical history

**Measured in ICU, 211 < 65 years and 218 ≥ 65 years

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Frequency of the rs1990760 T/C genotypes in the ICU patients distributed in age intervals. The frequency of C-carriers (CC + CT) decreased with age

Table 2.

Statistical difference between ICU patients < 65 and ≥ 65 years, univariate and multivariate R-linear generalized models. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval

Univariate model Multivariate model
p-value OR, 95%CI
Male 0.12 1.13, 0.76–1.69 0.51 1.17, 0.74–1.85
BMI ≥ 30 0.89 0.97, 0.68–1.39 0.44 0.85, 0.56–1.28
Hypertension  < 0.001 2.94, 2.03–4.29  < 0.001 2.03, 1.32–3.12
Hypercolesterolemia  < 0.001 3.11, 2.15–4.55  < 0.001 2.12, 1.27–3.69
Diabetes  < 0.001 3.32, 2.08–5.44  < 0.001 2.14, 1.26–3.69
IL-6 > 70 pg/mL 0.54 1.13, 0.77–1.65 0.53 1.14, 0.75–1.71

rs1990760

CC + CT vs. TT

0.01 1.64, 1.18–2.43 0.03 1.61, 1.03–2.53

We determined the association between the rs1990760 and the analytical and clinical variables in the ICU patients (suppl. Table 2). The only significant association was with IL6 at ICU admission: C-carriers had a higher frequency of IL6 > 70 pg/mL (p = 0.02).

We determined the association between the study variables and the risk of death in the critical ICU patients (Table 3). We did not find a significant effect of the rs1990760 on the risk of death (p = 0.23). However, in the elderly critical patients, the risk of death was significantly increased among rs1990760 C-patients (p = 0.046) (suppl. Table 3). Hypertension, dyslipemia, and IL6 > 70 were associated with death in the univariate logistic regression. After correcting by age, only IL6 > 70 remained significantly associated (OR = 1.67, 95%CI = 1.04–2.73).

Table 3.

Main characteristics of the ICU death and survivors COVID-19 cases

Death
N = 105
Survivors
N = 372
p-value
Age < 65 25 (24%) 80 (76%)  < 0.001
Male 75 (71%) 270 (73%) 0.82
BMI ≥ 30 54 (51%) 190 (51%) 0.94
Hypertension* 72 (69%) 190 (51%) 0.001
Hypercolesterolemia* 62 (58%) 179 (44%) 0.006
Diabetes* 26 (25%) 77 (21%) 0.37
Type 1 diabetes 0 4 -
IL-6 > 70 pg/mL 58 (62%) 164 (49%) 0.003
Corticosteroid yes 85 (80%) 334 (90%) 0.01

rs1990760C/T **

p.Ala946Thr

   CC 21 (20%) 87 (23%) 0.25
   CT 55 (52%) 159 (43%)
   TT 29 (28%) 126 (34%) -
Allele C (p.Ala 946) 0.46 0.45 -

rs35337543

int8 + 1 G > C

   GG 102 (97%) 366 (98%) -
   GC 3 (3%) 6 (2%) 0.09
   Allele C 0.01 0.01 -

rs35744605 G > T

p.Glu627Stop

   GG 99 (94%) 363 (98%) -
   GT 6 (6%) 9 (2%) 0.41
   Allele T 0.03 0.01 -

*Data obtained from the electronic clinical history

**For the rs1990760, we compared the C-carriers vs. TT

For the no-critical (no-ICU) COVID-19 patients, the C-frequency was also higher among the early-onset cases, without significant difference (suppl. Table 1). In cases < 65 years, the C allele was more frequent in the critical vs. non-ICU patients (p = 0.05). In the asymptomatic controls, the frequencies did not differ between the two age groups, with lower frequencies of the C allele (0.36) compared to the two patients groups (suppl. Table 1). Thus, the C allele (p.Ala946) was significantly associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 requiring hospitalization, with a maximum effect for early-onset critical ICU disease (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Frequency of the rs1990760 C-carriers (p.Ala946) vs TT (Thr946 homozygotes) in the three study groups aged < 65 and ≥ 65 years. Critical ICU, symptomatic no-ICU requiring in hospital treatment, and asymptomatic individuals

In reference to the rare rs35744605 SNP that would introduce a premature stop codon, we did not find significant differences between the age groups (Table 1). The observed allele frequencies were close to the reported among the European populations (MAF = 0.02; www.ensembl.org). One no-ICU patient was a female homozygous for the rs35744605 A, p.627stop (suppl. Figure 4). This genotype has a predicted frequency of 4 in 10,000 in our population and was associated with recurrent viral infections by some authors, likely due to the loss of the MDA5 antiviral function (Asgari et al. 2017). However, the patient was 71 years old with no episodes of recurrent infections. She was SARS-CoV-2 positive during the first pandemic wave (March 2020) and attended the hospital due to bilateral pneumonia with a positive clinical evolution and hospital discharge in 1 week.

The rs35337543-splicing variant would skip exon 8 and the European frequencies were close to the observed in our population. Carriers of the intron-splicing variant were less frequent in the ICU early-onset patients compared to the other groups (Table 1; suppl. Table 1). We did not find significant differences between this variant and the study variables. These rare variants had been associated with a reduced risk of type 1 diabetes (Nejentsev et al. 2009; Chistiakov et al. 2010). None of the type 1 diabetes was carrier of the rare alleles, but there were only 4 cases confirmed with this condition.

Discussion

The main finding of our study was a significant difference of the common IFIH1 rs1990760 (p.Ala946Thr) frequencies between critical COVID-19 patients aged below/above 65 years. This is the age value used to define early and late-onset COVID-19 by most authors (Nakanishi et al. 2021). Other gene markers have shown differences in the degree of association between the two age groups. For instance, the “top disease” marker in the LZTFL1 gene showed differences between early and late-onset patients (Ellinghaus et al. 2020; Nakanishi et al. 2021). For the rs1990760, we found a higher frequency of p.Ala946 carriers (CC + CT genotypes) in the critical ICU COVID-19 patients compared to no-ICU cases and healthy population controls. This genotype was also elevated among the elderly deceased patients.

The p.Ala946Thr could be associated with a conformational alteration of the MDA5 that results in different ATPase activities (Funabiki et al. 2014). Mutations that inhibit the ATPase activity would enhance the IFN-I (IFNβ) response (Bamming and Horvarth 2009). In addition to structural changes, this IFIH1 polymorphism has been associated with gene expression and basal protein levels (Liu et al. 2009; Downes et al. 2010; Zurawek et al. 2015). In reference to COVID-19, MDA5 is the main sensor of SARS-CoV-2 in lung epithelial cells and would thus regulate the early interferon response to inhibit viral replication (Sampaio et al. 2021; Thorne et al. 2021; Yin et al. 2021; Rebendenne et al. 2021; Amado-Rodriguez et al. 2022). Variants that drive a reduced IFIH1 expression and/or MDA5 function might reduce the IFN antiviral response increasing the risk for viral replication and disease severity (Yin et al. 2021; Rebendenne et al. 2021). In agreement with a protective effect on COVID-19 severity, the rs1990760 T was found at reduced frequency in patients with chronic hepatitis C compared to uninfected controls and was also associated with spontaneous clearance of HCV infection (Hoffmann et al. 2015). While the p.Thr946 allele might be detrimental for autoimmune disorders, it could be protective against viral disease by enhancing the early innate immune response (Gorman et al. 2017). Interestingly, patients with the CT + CC genotypes had higher levels of pro-inflammatory mediators, including IL-6, CXCL10, CXCL16, and CCL7 (Amado-Rodríguez et al. 2022; Zhang et al. 2020). In this study, we confirmed that C-carriers would have increased IL6 levels at ICU admission.

The association between the rs1990760 C and COVID-19 might also explain the heterogeneous impact of the disease in different populations. In this regard, populations with a higher allele frequency of SNP rs1990760 C allele could be predisposed to reduced IFIH1 expression and increased vulnerability to COVID-19 infection (Maiti 2020). The association between this allele and critical COVID-19 suggested a decreased protection for severe disease among Europeans that have the highest frequency of rs1990760 C.

In addition to common polymorphisms, IFIH1 has rare deleterious variants such as rs35337543 (a splicing variant that would result in the skipping of exon 8) and rs35744605 (that introduces a premature stop codon). The splicing variant has been reported as protective for T1D (Shapiro et al. 2021; Mine et al. 2020; Nejentsev et al. 2009). The rs35744605 (p.Glu627Stop) was present in approximately 1% of the individuals of European ancestry, and has been associated with decreased risk of T1D by some authors (Chistiakov et al. 2010). Carriers of the splicing variant would exhibit reduced expression while heterozygosity for the premature stop codon would have no effect on the level of IFIH1 mRNA (Downes et al. 2010). These loss-of-function variants might increase the risk for viral disease, but our results did not support a significant association with COVID-19 severity. However, the reduced sample size limited the statistical power of the study.

Finally, our study has several limitations. Mainly the limited sample size that would reduce the statistical power. In particular, the number of cases with the rare splicing and premature stop variants was too low and conclusions about the effect on COVID-19 require the study of large cohorts from different populations. The IFIH1 variants linked to reduced expression have been associated with protection for type 1 diabetes while they could also increase the risk of severe COVID-19. Because type 1 diabetes was rare among our patients, a study including a large cohort of patients with this condition is necessary. The effect of the genotypes on corticosteroid response was limited by the reduced number of critical patients without this immunosuppressive treatment. An increased IL6 blood level at ICU admission was associated with mortality, but we did not measure the IL6 values subsequently. Thus, the effect of corticosteroids on IL6 and a putative modifying effect of the IFIH1 variants was not evaluated in our study.

In conclusion, we report a significant effect of the common rs1990760 p.Ala946 variant on the risk of critical COVID-19 requiring ICU. The risk was higher among the early-onset (< 65 years) patients. The risk allele was also associated with higher IL6 blood levels at admission. Our results were in agreement with an increased risk for severe COVID-19 among carriers of IFIH1 variants linked to reduced MDA5 expression and lower interferon production.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Author contributions

Lead researchers: EC, GMA, LAR, JG. Study design: EC, GMA, LAR, JG. Patient assessment: GMA, LAR, ESR, ILA, CLM, PMV, ECLL, MGC, THV, AIER, CHG. Genetic study: MGMB, EC, ECL, VA, JG. Database: EC, GMA, LAR, ECL, JG. Data filtering and analysis: MGMB,EC, GMA. Statistical analysis: MGMB, EC. Analysis of results: MGMB, EC, GMA, LAR, MGC. Drafting of the manuscript: EC. Revision of the manuscript: all authors. All the authors contributed to this work by recruiting the patients and performing the genetic and statistical analyses. EC takes full responsibility for the accuracy of the data. All the authors approved the submission of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Spanish Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII)-European Union Next Generation MRR founds. Grants ISCIII PI-21/00971 (EC) and RICORS2040 (EC).

Data availability

The materials and raw data described in the manuscript will be freely available to any researcher without breaching participant’s confidentiality. To facilitate the revision of the results by other researchers, a file with the patient’s data is available as an Excel file upon request to the corresponding author.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Alon R, Sportiello M, Kozlovski S, Kumar A, Reilly EC, Zarbock A, et al. Leukocyte trafficking to the lungs and beyond: lessons from influenza for COVID-19. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21:49–64. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-00470-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amado-Rodríguez L, Salgado Del Riego E, Gomez de Ona J, López Alonso I, Gil-Pena H, López-Martínez C et al (2022) Effects of IFIH1 Rs1990760 variants on systemic inflammation and outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients in an observational translational study. Elife 11:e73012. 10.7554/eLife.73012. PMID: 35060899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Asgari S, Schlapbach LJ, Anchisi S, Hammer C, Bartha I, Junier T, et al. Severe viral respiratory infections in children with IFIH1 loss-of-function mutations. Proc Natl AcadSci U S a. 2017;114:8342–8347. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704259114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bamming D, Horvath CM (2009) Regulation of signal transduction by enzymatically inactive antiviral RNA helicase proteins MDA5, RIG-I, and LGP2. J Biol Chem 284:9700–12. 10.1074/jbc.M807365200. PMID: 19211564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Borysewicz-Sańczyk H, Sawicka B, Wawrusiewicz-Kurylonek N, Głowińska-Olszewska B, Kadłubiska A, Gościk J, et al. Genetic association study of IL2RA, IFIH1, and CTLA-4 polymorphisms with autoimmune thyroid diseases and type 1 diabetes. Front Pediatr. 2020;21(8):481. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cen H, Wang W, Leng R-X, et al. Association of IFIH1 Rs1990760 polymorphism with susceptibility to autoimmune diseases: a meta-analysis. Autoimmunity. 2013;46:455–462. doi: 10.3109/08916934.2013.796937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chistiakov DA, Voronova NV, Savost'Anov KV, Turakulov RI (2010) Loss-of-function mutations E6 27X and I923V of IFIH1 are associated with lower poly(I:C)–induced interferon-β production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of type 1 diabetes patients. Human Immunol 71:1128–34. 10.1016/j.humimm.2010.08.005. PMID: 20736039 [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Coto E, Avanzas P, Gómez J. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and coronavirus disease 2019. EurCardiol. 2021;16:e07. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2020.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. COVID-19 Host genetics initiative (2021) Mapping the human genetic architecture of COVID-19. Nature 600:472–7. 10.1038/s41586-021-03767-x. PMID: 34237774 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. David S, Dorado G, Duarte EL, David-Bosne S, Trigueiro-Louro J, Rebelo-de-Andrade H. COVID-19: impact on public health and hypothesis-driven investigations on genetic susceptibility and severity. Immunogenetics. 2022;74:381–407. doi: 10.1007/s00251-022-01261-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Del Valle DM, Kim-Schulze S, Huang HH, et al. An inflammatory cytokine signature predicts COVID-19 severity and survival. Nat Med. 2020;26(10):1636–1643. doi: 10.1038/S41591-020-1051-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dias Junior AG, Sampaio NG, Rehwinkel J. A balancing act: MDA5 in antiviral immunity and autoinflammation. Trends Microbiol. 2019;27(1):75–85. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Downes K, Pekalski M, Angus KL, Hardy M, Nutland S, Smyth DJ et al (2010) Reduced expression of IFIH1 is protective for type 1 diabetes. PLoS One 5:e12646. 10.1371/journal.pone.0012646. PMID: 20844740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  14. Ellinghaus D, Degenhardt F, Bujanda L, Buti M, Albillos A, Invernizzi P, et al. Genome wide association study of severe Covid-19 with respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1522–1534. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2020283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Forbester JL, Humphreys IR. Genetic influences on viral-induced cytokine responses in the lung. Mucosal Immunol. 2021;14:14–25. doi: 10.1038/s41385-020-00355-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Funabiki M, Kato H, Miyachi Y, Toki H, Motegi H, Inoue M et al (2014) Autoimmune disorders associated with gain of function of the intracellular sensor MDA5. Immunity 40:199–212. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.12.014. PMID: 24530055 [DOI] [PubMed]
  17. Gorman JA, Hundhausen C, Errett JS, et al. The A946T variant of the RNA sensor IFIH1 mediates an interferon program that limits viral infection but increases the risk for autoimmunity. Nat Immunol. 2017;18:744–752. doi: 10.1038/ni.3766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hadjadj J, Yatim N, Barnabei L, et al. Impaired type I interferon activity and inflammatory responses in severe COVID-19 patients. Science. 2020;369:718–724. doi: 10.1126/science.abc6027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoffmann FS, Schmidt A, DittmannChevillotte M, Wisskirchen C, Hellmuth J, et al. Polymorphisms in melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 link protein function to clearance of hepatitis C virus. Hepatology. 2015;61:460–470. doi: 10.1002/hep.27344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim WK, Jain D, Sánchez MD, Koziol-White CJ, Matthews K, Ge MQ, et al. Deficiency of melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 results in exacerbated chronic postviral lung inflammation. Am J RespirCrit Care Med. 2014;189:437–448. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201307-1338OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kousathanas A, Pairo-Castineira E, Rawlik K, Stuckey A, Odhams CA, Walker S et al (2022) Whole-genome sequencing reveals host factors underlying critical COVID-19. Nature 607:97–103. 10.1038/s41586-022-04576-6. PMID: 35255492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  22. Lamborn IT, Jing H, Zhang Y, Drutman SB, Abbott JK, Munir S, et al. Recurrent rhinovirus infections in a child with inherited MDA5 deficiency. J Exp Med. 2017;214:1949–1972. doi: 10.1084/jem.20161759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu S, Wang H, Jin Y, et al. IFIH1 Polymorphisms are significantly associated with type 1 diabetes and IFIH1 gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:358–365. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Luo X, Lv M, Zhang X, Estill J, Yang B, Lei R et al (2022) Clinical manifestations of COVID-19: an overview of 102 systematic reviews with evidence mapping. J Evid Based Med. 10.1111/jebm.12483. PMID: 35909298. Online ahead of print [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  25. Maiti AK. The African-American population with a low allele frequency of SNP rs1990760 (T allele) in IFIH1 predicts less IFN-beta expression and potential vulnerability to COVID-19 infection. Immunogenetics. 2020;72:387–391. doi: 10.1007/s00251-020-01174-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mine K, Yoshikai Y, Takahashi H, Mori H, Anzai K, Nagafuchi S (2020) Genetic susceptibility of the host in virus-induced diabetes. Microorganisms 8:E1133. 10.3390/microorganisms8081133. PMID: 32727064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  27. Nakanishi T, Pigazzini S, Degenhardt F, Cordioli M, Butler-Laporte G, Maya-Miles D, et al. Age-dependent impact of the major common genetic risk factor for COVID-19 on severity and mortality. J Clin Invest. 2021;131:e152386. doi: 10.1172/JCI152386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nejentsev S, Walker N, Riches D, Egholm M, Todd JA. Rare variants of IFIH1, a gene implicated in antiviral responses, protect against type 1 diabetes. Science. 2009;324:387–389. doi: 10.1126/science.1167728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nile SH, Nile A, Qiu J, Li L, Jia X, Kai G. COVID-19: Pathogenesis, cytokine storm and therapeutic potential of interferons. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2020;53:66–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Portuondo-Jimenez J, Bilbao-González A, Tíscar-González V, Garitano-Gutiérrez I, García-Gutiérrez S, Martínez-Mejuto A, et al. Modelling the risk of hospital admission of lab confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infected patients in primary care: a population-based study. Intern Emerg Med. 2022;17:1211–1221. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-02931-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rebendenne A, Valadão ALC, Tauziet M, Maarifi G, Bonaventure B, McKellar J, et al. SARS-CoV-2 triggers an MDA-5-dependent interferon response which is unable to control replication in lung epithelial cells. J Virol. 2021;95:e02415–e2420. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02415-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rice GI, Del Toro DY, Jenkinson EM, Forte GM, Anderson BH, Ariaudo G, et al. Gain-of-function mutations in IFIH1 cause a spectrum of human disease phenotypes associated with upregulated type I interferon signaling. Nat Genet. 2014;46:503–509. doi: 10.1038/ng.2933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rice GI, Park S, Gavazzi F, Adang LA, Ayuk LA, Van Eyck L et al (2020) Genetic and phenotypic spectrum associated with IFIH1 gain-of-function. Hum Mutat 41:837–849. 10.1002/humu.23975. PMID: 31898846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  34. Sampaio NG, Chauveau L, Hertzog J, Bridgeman A, Fowler G, Moonen JP et al (2021) The RNA sensor MDA5 detects SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sci Rep 11:13638. 10.1038/s41598-021-92940-3.PMID: PMID:34211037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  35. Shapiro MR, Thirawatananond P, Peters L, et al. De-coding genetic risk variants in type 1 diabetes. Immunol Cell Biol. 2021;99:496–508. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Thorne LG, Reuschl AK, Zuliani-Alvarez L, Whelan MVX, Turner J, Noursadeghi M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 sensing by RIG-I and MDA5 links epithelial infection to macrophage inflammation. EMBO J. 2021;40:e107826. doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tonutti A, Motta F, Ceribelli A, Isailovic N, Selmi C, De Santis M (2022) Anti-MDA5 antibody linking COVID-19, type I Interferon, and autoimmunity: a case report and systematic literature review. Front Immunol 13:937667. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.937667. PMID: 35833112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  38. Wang J, Jiang M, Chen X, Montaner LJ. Cytokine storm and leukocyte changes in mild versus severe SARS-CoV-2 infection: review of 3939 COVID-19 patients in China and emerging pathogenesis and therapy concepts. J Leukoc Biol. 2020;108:17–41. doi: 10.1002/JLB.3COVR0520-272R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang G, Wang Q, Wang Y, Liu C, Wang L, Chen H, et al. Presence of anti-MDA5 antibody and its value for the clinical assessment in patients with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study. Front Immunol. 2021;12:791348. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.791348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. WHO (2020) Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working group. Association between administration of systemic corticosteroids and mortality among critically ill patients with COVID-19: A Meta-analysis. JAMA 324(13):1330–1341. 10.1001/jama.2020.17023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  41. Yin X, Riva L, Pu Y, Martin-Sancho L, Kanamune J, Yamamoto Y et al (2021) MDA5 governs the innate immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in lung epithelial cells. Cell Rep 34:108628. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108628. PMID: 33440148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  42. Zhang P, Shi L, Xu J, Wang Y, Yang H (2020) Elevated interleukin-6 and adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients: a meta-analysis based on adjusted effect estimates. Immunogenetics 72:431-437. 10.1007/s00251-020-01179-1. PMID: 33067641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  43. Zurawek M, Fichna M, Fichna P, Skowronska B, Dzikiewicz-Krawczyk A, et al. Cumulative effect of IFIH1 variants and increased gene expression associated with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015;107:259–266. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The materials and raw data described in the manuscript will be freely available to any researcher without breaching participant’s confidentiality. To facilitate the revision of the results by other researchers, a file with the patient’s data is available as an Excel file upon request to the corresponding author.


Articles from Immunogenetics are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES