Abstract
The emergence and spread of Plasmodium falciparum (P.f) drug resistance is still a major concern in Sub-Saharan Africa and warrants that its evolution be monitored continuously. The present study aimed at determining the distribution of key P.f drug resistance-mediating alleles in circulating malaria parasites in the West region of Cameroon. A cross sectional hospital-based study was conducted in Dschang and Ngounso in the West region of Cameroon. The Pfcrt, Pfmdr1, and the Pfdhps genes were amplified through nested PCR in 208 malaria-infected samples of the 301 febrile outpatients enrolled. The presence or absence of mutations in the K76T, N86Y, A437G and A581G codons of these P.f. genes respectively were determined through restriction digestion analysis. The proportion of different alleles were estimated as percentages and compared between two study sites using the Chi square test. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. A high prevalence (75.6%) of the 437G allele was observed. It was significantly different between Dschang and Ngounso (62% vs. 89.2%, X2 = 19.6, P = 0.00005). Equally observed was a 19.2% (95%CI: 13.3–25.6) of the dhps-581G mutant allele. Furthermore, we observed the Pfcrt-76T, Pfmdr1-N86 mutations in 73.0% (67.5–79.7) and 87.2% (83.2–91.9), and 3.0% (0.0–9.6) and 12.8% was observed for the Pfcrt-K76T and Pfmdr1-N86Y respectively. When biallelic haplotypes were constructed from alleles of the three genes, same pattern was seen. Overall, 73% and 87% of circulating P. falciparum isolates carried wild type alleles at Pfmdr1-N86Y and Pfcrt-K76T. On the other hand, we found more parasites with mutant alleles at dhps (437G and 581G) loci which may reflect possible drug-related selection of this mutant in the parasite population. Continuous monitoring of these mutations is recommended to pre-empt a loss in sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine efficacy in malaria chemoprevention programs.
Keywords: Malaria, Drug resistance, Pfcrt, Pfmdr1, Pfdhps, Ngounso, West region, Cameroon
Malaria, drug resistance, Pfcrt, Pfmdr1, Pfdhps, Ngounso, West region, Cameroon.
1. Introduction
Malaria remains an important public health concern in tropical countries where it is endemic [1]. In 2019, there was an estimated 229 million malaria cases with approximately 409,000 deaths from 87 malaria-endemic countries. Approximately 94% of estimated cases were detected in Africa [1]. Strategies to fight include accurate and prompt diagnosis, vector control and chemotherapy [2]. Before 2001, mono-therapy with chloroquine and amodiaquine were the first-line drugs for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. However, extensive review reports showed that the clinical efficacy of mono-therapy significantly declined [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. The poor clinical efficacy of the mono-therapy due to drug resistance led the WHO in 2004 to recommend the introduction of combination therapy, notably, artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) [8]. Most countries in sub-Saharan Africa where malaria is endemic adopted ACTs such as artemether-lumefantrine (AL) or artesunate-amodiaquine (AS-AQ) as their first-line ACTs. Cameroonian health authorities recommended AS-AQ as the first-line treatment of uncomplicated malaria since 2004 and AL as an alternative therapy since 2006 [9]. The emergence and spread of resistance to artemisinin in Western Cambodia of Southeast Asia [10, 11, 12, 13] prompted global concern given that chloroquine and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance [14, 15, 16] arose in the same region and then spread to Sub-Saharan Africa. Recent studies also suggest that resistant mutations may emerge independently in these areas and then spread as has been shown in previous studies [17, 18, 19, 20]. Also, the emergence of resistance and tolerance against the long-acting ACT partner drugs, such as amodiaquine and lumefantrine, may consequently affect the efficacy of the ACTs partners and increase the emergence of resistance to the short-acting artemisinin-derivatives [21].
Although ACT partners drugs remains effective in Africa, prolonged and abusive use would lead to anti-malarial drug resistance. Anti-malarial drug resistance (ADR) would be disastrous for global malaria control. Therefore, in the absence of more treatment options, it is important to monitor the ADR status of P. falciparum parasites. Mutations detected in P. falciparum essential genes including chloroquine resistance transporter gene (Pfcrt), multidrug resistance gene (Pfmdr1), dihydrofolate reductase (pfdhfr), dihydropteroate synthetase (Pfdhps), Kelch-13 (pfk13), and Plasmepsin (pfpm2) have been used as molecular markers of drug resistance [22, 23]. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been fundamental in monitoring existing or predicting emerging drug resistance patterns. SNPs in the Pfmdr1 and Pfcrt genes have been associated with resistance to chloroquine [22] amodiaquine [24], lumefantrine, and quinine but also linked to ACTs introduction. In addition, SNPs in pfdhfr and Pfdhps have been associated with pyrimethamine and sulfadoxine resistance respectively [15, 23, 25, 26]. On the other hand, a high proportion of Pfmdr-1 N86 and Pfcrt K76 alleles have been recorded in AL treated patients with recurrent parasites [27, 28].
In the Western region of Cameroon, characterized by varied malaria parasite transmission patterns, there is paucity of data on the prevalence of these resistance markers among parasite populations from clinical samples. The present study aimed at evaluating the key SNPs in Pfcrt, Pfmdr1, and Pfdhps genes in circulating P. falciparum infections in Dschang (low transmission) on the western plateau with a transmission intensity of 62.8ib/human/year and Ngounso (high transmission) in the western lowland with a transmission intensity of 90.5ib/human/year.
2. Methods
2.1. Study setting and location
Two localities of the West region of Cameroon; Dschang (5.45, 10.06E and Ngounso 5.96N, 11.23E) were chosen. Dschang is the capital of the Menoua division, one of the six in the West region. It has an annual rainfall of 2000mm and is situated at 1400m above sea level. It has an equatorial climate with a mountainous relief, characterized by two distinct seasons, the main rainy (mid-March-October) punctuated by a short dry season in July, and the main dry (November-Early March). Ngounso is a village located in Magba Sub-division, in Noun Division of the Western Region of Cameroon. It is situated 60km north of Foumban town, the Head Quarter of the division along the national road number 6 to Banyo. It is situated in the Noun lowlands with an altitude of 720m above sea level and an annual rainfall of 1500mm. As Dschang, it has and equatorial climate characterized by two distinct seasons, the rainy season (April to October) and the dry season (November to March).
2.2. Study design
We carried out a cross-sectional study from May to August 2020 in the district hospital in Dschang and in the Cameroon Baptist Convention Integrated Health centre in Ngounso. An ethical clearance was obtained from the Cameroon Baptist Convention Health Services Institutional Review Board (IRB2019-38 of 05/02/, 2020). All febrile patients for whom a malaria test was prescribed and who consented to participate in the study were included. Approximately 0.5ml of peripheral blood was collected and distributed as follows: 0.1ml for malaria microscopy, 0.1ml for malaria rapid diagnostic test (CareStart Malaria Ag Pf/Pan) and the rest (0.3ml) was spotted on a Whatman 3MM filter paper (3 spots), air-dried, labelled and stored at minus 20 °C in polyethylene bags containing a small sachet of silica gel.
2.3. Parasite DNA extraction
The malaria parasite DNA was extracted using the Chelex 100 technique as described elsewhere [23]. Basically, the filter paper spotted blood samples were incubated overnight with 1ml 0.5% saponine at +4 °C. Then the spot was washed with 1ml PBS 1x for 30 min at +4 °C. The spot was then introduced in a microtube containing 50ul pre-heated Chelex with 150ul Molecular grade water. The mixture went through three rounds of heating at 100 °C for 10min each time preceded by thorough vortexing for 15sec. After this, the product was centrifuged for 2 min at 14000 rmp. The supernatant was introduced into a new microtube and centrifuged again as in the previous step. The supernatant was collected and stored at -20 °C.
2.4. Amplification of parasite genes by the polymerase chain reaction
The amplification of the parasite DNA was done as previously described by PLowe et al., [29]. The sequence of primers of gene fragments targeted are shown in Table 1, based on a previous study [22, 30, 31, 32]. A total volume consisting of 7 μl of nuclease free water (NFW), 10 μl of OneTaq® Hot Start 2X Master Mix with standard buffer (New England Biolabs, MA, USA.), 0.5 μl of each primer 0.4 μM (R2, R/) and 2 μl of DNA extract was composed. The amplification reaction conditions were for dhps; pre-denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min; denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, primer annealing at 50 °C for 2 min, extension at 72 °C for 2 min x 40 cycles and a termination at 72 °C for 10 min. Regarding the nested PCR, each tube consisted of 8μl of DNAase-free water, 10 ul of OneTaq® Hot Start 2X Master Mix with standard buffer (New England Biolabs, MA, USA.), 0.5μl of each nested primers 0.4 μM (K + K/and L + L/) and 1μl of amplicon of the primary PCR reaction for a total volume of 20μl. These tubes were subjected to the following amplification conditions: denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, primer annealing at 45 °C for 1 min, extension at 72 °C for 2 min x 35 cycles and termination at 72 °C for 10 min.
Table 1.
Primer sequences and codons targeted for PCR amplification.
| Gene & PCR type | Mutation | Primer identity | Sequence (5’→3′) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfcrt primary PCR reaction | K76T | CRT-P1 (1/5) | CCGTTAATAATAAATACACGCAG |
| CRT-P2 (1/5) | CGGATGTTACAAAACTATAGTTACC | ||
| Pfcrt nested PCR reaction | K76T | CRT-D3 (1/5) | TGTGCTCATGTGTTTAAACTT |
| CRT-D4 (1/5) | CAAAACTATAGTTACCAATTTTG | ||
| Pfmdr1 primary PCR reaction | N86Y | MDR1 | GCGCGCGTTGAACAAAAAGAGTACCGCTG |
| MDR2 | GGGCCCTCGTACCAATTCCTGAACTCAC | ||
| Pfmdr1 nested PCR reaction | MDR3 | TTTACCGTTTAAATGTTTACCTGC | |
| MDR4 | CCATCTTGATAAAAAACACTTCTT | ||
| Dhps Primary PCR reaction | A437G | R2 | AACCTAAACGTGCTGTTCAA |
| R/ | AATTGTGTGATTTGTCCACAA | ||
| Dhps nested PCR reaction | K | TGCTAGTGTTATAGATATAGGATGAGCATC | |
| K/ | CTATAACGAGGTATTGCATTTAATGCAAGAA | ||
| Dhps Primary PCRreaction | A581G | R2 | AACCTAAACGTGCTGTTCAA |
| R/ | AATTGTGTGATTTGTCCACAA | ||
| Dhps nested PCR reaction | L | ATAGGATACTATTTGATATTGGACCAGGATTCG | |
| L/ | ATTACAACATTTTGATCATTCGCGCAACCGG |
To amplify the Pfmdr1 gene fragment of interest, a total reaction volume of 20 μl was prepared containing 8 μl of DNAase-free water, 0.5 μl of each of the outer primers 0.4 μM (MDR 1 and MDR2), 9 μl of OneTaq® Hot Start 2X Master Mix with standard buffer (New England Biolabs, MA, USA.) and 2 μl of extract of d'DNA. The tubes were then placed in T3 Thermocycler (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany) for amplification under the following reaction conditions; Pre-denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, denaturation at 94 °C for 30s, hybridization at 60 °C for 60s, elongation at 72 °C for 10 min through 30 cycles; and finally termination at 72 °C for 3 min. For the nested reaction, the 20 μl reaction volume consisted of 9 μl of NFW, 0.5 μl of each 0.4 μM MDR3 and0.4 μM MDR4 primers, a 9 μl OneTaq® Hot Start 2X Master Mix with standard buffer (New England Biolabs, MA, USA.) and 1 μl of primary PCR amplicon. The tubes were then placed in a thermocycler (T3 Thermocycler, Göttingen, Germany) for amplification according to the program: pre-denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, 30 cycles; denaturation at 94 °C for 30s, hybridization at 60 °C for 60s, elongation at 72 °C for 1–10 min, followed by termination at 72 °C for 3 min.
We then amplified the Pfcrt gene fragment of interest under the following reaction conditions. For each tube, a 20μl total reaction volume was prepared consisting of 8μl of DNAase-free water, 0.5μl of each of 0.4 μM CRT-P1 and0.4 μM CRT-P2 primers, 9 μl of OneTaq® Hot Start 2X Master Mix with standard buffer (New England Biolabs, MA, USA.) and 2 μl of DNA extract. Pre-denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; denaturation at 94 °C for 30s, hybridization at 60 °C for 60s, elongation at 72 °C for 1–10 min for a total of 30 cycles, followed by termination at 72 °C for 3 min. The products of the primary PCR reaction were used as substrate for the nested PCR reaction. For this, a new 20 μl reaction volume was prepared for each tube composed of 9 μl of DNAase-free water, 0.5 μl of each of 0.4 μM CRT-D3 and 0.4 μM CRT-D4 primers, a 9 μl of OneTaq® Hot Start 2X Master Mix with standard buffer (New England Biolabs, MA, USA.) and 1 μl of the primary PCR product. The tubes were then placed in the same thermocycler for amplification according to the program: pre-denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, 30 cycles; denaturation at 94 °C for 30s, hybridization at 60 °C for 60s, elongation at 72 °C for 1–10 min, followed by termination at 72 °C for 3 min.
The amplified Pfmdr-1, Pfdhps, Pfcrt genes were revealed using 2% agarose gel (stained with Ethidium bromide) electrophoresis and visualized using a UV transilluminator. Samples that amplified the malaria parasite specific fragment targeted by the primers in the semi nested PCR were selected to screen for the mutations related to drug resistance in P. falciparum. The Genomic DNA of HB3, 3D7 and Dd2 strains of P. falciparum (from the Sutherland laboratory at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK) were used as positive controls for the studied polymorphisms.
2.5. Restriction digestion
Single nucleotide polymorphisms in selected genes were detected using restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP-PCR). For the Pfmdr1, the region containing codon 86 was digested using the restriction enzyme AflIII. The master mix (20μl) for each template sample of the Pfmdr-1 gene was prepared in a 0.2ml microtube: 8.6μl nuclease free water, 3.0μl buffer (10XmM), 0.4μl, 1U AflIII and 8μl amplicon respectively. The tubes were incubated overnight at 37 °C and digestion was revealed using 2% agarose gel. The region around codon 76 of the Pfcrt gene was digested using the restriction enzyme APO I which cuts or digests the DNA if Lys is present (when there is no mutation). The master mix (20μl) for digestion experiment for each sample of the Pfcrt gene was prepared in a 0.2ml microtube: 7.8μl nuclease free water, 3.0μl buffer (10mM), 0.2μl BSA, 1μl 1U APO I and 8μl amplicon. The tubes were incubated overnight at 50 °C and digestion was revealed using a 2% agarose gel electrophoresis as described above. For the dhps gene, restriction digestion of amplicons was performed using codon specific restriction enzymes AvaII for A437G and BstUI for A581G. Each tube consisted of 8μl of DNAase-free water, 3μl of 10X buffer, 1μl of restriction enzyme at concentration 1U and 8μl of amplicons for a total volume of 20μl. The mixtures were then incubated at 37 °C for the AvaII enzyme and 60 °C for the BstUI enzyme in an incubator for 1.5 h. The products of digestion were revealed using a 2% agarose gel electrophoresis as described above and interpretation done as per standard operating procedures.
2.6. Data analysis
Data from this study were transcribed from paper records unto an Excel sheet (Microsoft Excel; version 2016). Data entry was double-checked to prevent transcription errors. We then used this as the base to build the database of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) per entry. This de-identified dataset was used to calculate the proportion of each SNP genotyped, alongside their 95% confidence intervals. The Chi square test (X2 test) was used to measure differences in genotype proportions between study sites. Where the number of expected observations was less than 5, the Fisher's test was used. The R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; version 4.0.4) was used to analyze the dataset. A p < 0.05 was considered significant in all comparisons.
2.6.1. Ethical considerations
Before performing this study, an ethical clearance was obtained from the Cameroon Baptist Convention Health Services Institutional Review Board (IRB2019-38 of 05/02/, 2020). All study staff were trained on human subject research and good clinical laboratory practice prior to enrolling study participants. All participants provided written informed consent/assent after the study background, objectives, and procedures, measures to minimize risk; the benefits; measures to maintain confidentiality and privacy were explained. Participants who did not provide a written consent were not enrolled in the study, but were treated with the same standard of care as anyone else. The consent included agreement to publication of de-identified data through peer-reviewed manuscripts.
3. Results
3.1. Demographic distribution of the study population
A total of 301 patients were recruited for this study. Out of this, 208 patients whose isolates provided at least one genotype result were included in the analysis. 105 from Dschang and 103 from Ngounso. 110 (52.9%) were females and 98 (47.1 %) males. The age group 0–29 was the most represented 138 (66.4%). This is summarized in Table 2 below.
Table 2.
Sociodemographic characteristics of the study population.
| Parameter | Category | N (%) | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study site | Dschang | 105 (50.5) | [43.8–57.6] |
| Ngounso | 103 (49.5) | [42.8–56.7] | |
| Sex | Female | 110 (52.9) | [46.2–60.0] |
| Male | 98 (47.1) | [40.4–54.3] | |
| Age | 0–29 | 138 (66.3) | [60.1–73.0] |
| 29–81 | 70 (36.7) | [27.4–40.3] |
CI: Confidence Interval.
3.1.1. Prevalence of the Pfcrt K76T and Pfmdr1 N86Y mutations
The prevalence of K76T and N86Y mutations was assessed for all the samples positive by PCR. An overall amplification efficiency of 94.7% (92.3–97.7; 95%CI) for the Pfcrt K76T and 94.2% (91.8–97.5; 95%CI) for the Pfmdr1 N86Y mutations was obtained. The mutations detected are presented in Table 3 below.
Table 3.
Frequency of the wild and mutant alleles in the study population.
| codon | number | Mutant allele No (%)[95%CI] |
Wild-type No (%)[95%CI] |
Wild-type $ Mutant No (%)[95%CI] |
Percentage positivity (%)[95%CI] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pfcrt K76T | 197/208 | 47 (23.9) [18.3–30.4] | 144 (73.0) [67.5–79.7] | 6 (3.0) [0.0–9.6] | 94.7 [92.3–97.7] |
| Pfmdr1 N86Y | 196/208 | 0 (0) [0.0–4.7] | 171 (87.2) [83.2–91.9] | 25 (12.8) | 94.2 [91.8–97.5] |
| Pfdhps A437G | 201/208 | 152 (75.6) [70.1–81.7] | 43 (21.4) [15.9–27.5] | 6 (3.0) [0.0–9.1) | 96.6 [94.7–98.9] |
| A581G | 203/208 | 39 (19.2) [13.3–25.6] | 143 (70.4) [64.5–76.8] | 21 (10.3) [4.4–16.7] | 97.6 [94.7–98.9] |
CI: Confidence Interval.
3.1.2. Pfcrt-K76T and Pfmdr1-N86Y alleles in the study sample
The prevalence of K76T and N86Y mutations was determined for all PCR positive samples. Of the 208 malaria positive samples, 144 [73.1% (95%CI: 67.5–79.7)] had the wild-type allele, 47 [23.9% (95%CI: 18.3–30.4)] the mutant allele and 6 [3.0% (95%CI: 0.0–9.6)] were both mutant and Wild-type for the K76T loci in the study samples. Regarding the Pfmdr1-N86Y gene, we found a prevalence of 87.2% (95%CI: 83.2–91.9) for the wild-type Pfmdr1-N86, and 12.8% (25/196 [83.2–91.9; 95%CI]) harbored both the mutant and the wild-type at this locus (Table 2). No mutant Pfmdr1-86Y allele was found. Although we found differences in the prevalence of K76T mutation between the sites, these differences were not significant (P = 0.6) as shown in Table S1. With regards to Pfmdr1-N86Y, the prevalence of samples carrying both the mutant and the Wild-type genotype was significantly different between the two sites (P = 0.03; S1). Overall, there was a high proportion of circulating parasites with the wild type alleles at the analyzed loci in both genes.
3.1.3. Pfdhps A437G and A581G alleles in the study samples
We had an amplification efficiency of 96.6% (94.7–98.9; 95%CI) and97.6% [94.7–98.9; 95%CI] for the Pfdhps fragments containing the mutations A437G and A581G respectively (Table 3). For the A437G mutation, we had a predominance of the mutant haplotype 152 (75.6%), and 6 (3.0%) having both the mutant and the wild-type. There was a significance difference (P < 0.05, X2 = 19.6) between the prevalence of A437G mutations of the two studied sites (Figure 1, lower panel. Table S1). For the A581G mutation, we found a predominance of the wild-type allele 143 (70.4% [64.5–76.8; 95%CI]) with no significant difference between the prevalence in Dschang [72.5% (64.7–81.4)] compared to Ngounso [69.3% (95%CI 60.4–77.9)] at both of these loci (Figure 1. Table S1). We also found the mutant allele in 39 isolates [19.2 %; (95%CI 13.3–25.6)] and 21 isolates [10.3%; (95%CI: 4.4–16.7)] had both the mutant and the Wild-type alleles. Out of this, 14 were from patients in Ngounso.
Figure 1.
Frequency of aminoquinoline Upper panel (A: Pfcrt 76 and B: Pfmdr1 86) and antifolate Lower Panel (C: pfdhps 437 and D: pfdhps 581) mutations within the study population of Dschang and Ngounso.
Biallelic haplotypes of resistance markers studied.
We constructed biallelic haplotypes from the mutations observed in different genes in monoclonal infections. The combinations of multiple mutations found in single genes and in both genes, are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Biallelic haplotypes of Pfcrt-K76T and Pfmdr1-N86Y markers of resistance in the study sites.
These combination of haplotypes in an isolate, was defined as wild type haplotype when they contained the wild type allele at all loci. Similarly, mutant haplotypes were defined as having the mutant alleles at both loci. The mutant haplotype TY made of the 76T and the 86Y was 3.7% [95% CI: 0.0–13.1] (8/213) of the total for the double mutation TY in the entire studied population. With 04 from each site. We found a 19.3% [95% CI: 13.1–26.1] (43/222) for the double mutant haplotype GG of the Pfdhps gene. No significant difference was found when the proportions of this double mutant was compared between the two studied sites (S1).
4. Discussion
A cross-sectional study in two sites to assess the prevalence of mutations in the Pfcrt-76, Pfmdr1-86 and the Pfdhps codon 437 and 538 genes responsible for Plasmodium falciparum resistance in malaria patients was conducted. The Pfcrt K76T mutation is involved in the resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to amodiaquine and chloroquine (7,25–27), the Pfmdr1 N86Y mutation which is a multi-drug resistance mutation to Plasmodium falciparum is associated to the usual antimalarial drugs namely amodiaquine, quinine, chloroquine, artemether [24, 27] and the Pfdhps which is associated to sulphadoxine and pyrimethamine [25, 33].
Studies assessing the occurrence of resistance-conferring alleles in natural populations of Plasmodium falciparum are important for epidemiological purposes but also for drug policy making. Molecular markers of drug resistance have been shown to provide early warning signs about potential loss in drug efficacy [7, 19, 22, 33]. The primary goal of this study was to assess key single nucleotide polymorphisms of the Pfcrt, Pfmdr1 and Pfdhps associated with P. falciparum drug resistance in malaria-infected samples in two health facilities in the west region of Cameroon. Of the 301 samples amplified, 208 were positive amplification for Plasmodium falciparum, with 105 from Dschang and 103 from Ngounso giving an overall 69.1% positivity. This percentage positivity could be due to the presence of other species of Plasmodium present in the population which we did not explore in the present study.
The characterization of the Pfmdr1 gene showed a distribution of the dominant Pfmdr1 wild-type allele N86 with an overall prevalence of 87.2% (171/196), 12.8% (25/196) of both mutations and none of the mutant allele 86Y was found in both sites. These findings are consistent with the work of Sulayman et al. [34], who also did not find the 86Y mutant allele in both study sites. The proportions of mutants obtained in the two sites were different and statistically significant (P < 0.05). Equally, the 76T mutation of the Pfcrt gene, which codes for a transporter protein located in the digestive vacuole of P. falciparum, was found in 24.7% (24/97) in Dschang and in 23.0% (23/100) in Ngounso. The overall prevalence of the Pfcrt 76T allele found was 23.9%. This finding corroborates with that obtained in Equatorial Guinea (30%) by Berzosa et al. [35],who assessed the mutations in locations of similar urbanity and malaria transmission intensity like our study. Previous studies by Ali et al., (2014, unpublished) in Cameroon showed a higher prevalence (83%) compared to ours). The decrease in the prevalence of the Pfcrt 76T mutation may primarily be due to the withdrawal of chloroquine from the Cameroonian market as a first-line treatment, which would have contributed to the decrease in drug pressure and consequently to the re-emergence of chloroquine sensitive parasites [36, 37, 38, 39].
The results indicate that parasites keep evolving in the presence of selection forces such as drug pressure. While the findings are good for the sensitivity of chloroquine and amodiaquine, the current use of artemether-lumefantrine in malaria case management might be threatened, largely because the CQ and AQ resistance related wild type alleles are selected for by pressure from lumefantrine exposure while parasites with mutant alleles are selected for by CQ and AQ. There is a growing body of evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies that lumefantrine selects for parasites with wild type Pfmdr1-N86 alleles including in efficacy trials [21, 40].The re-emergence of wild type Pfmdr1 and Pfcrt parasites may also be a result of widespread use of artemether-lumefantrine in both prescription settings and over-the-counter. Although we did not quantify the use of Artemether-Lumefantrine in the study areas, in a similar high transmission area in Cameron, artemether-lumefantrine was noted as the antimalarial of choice purchased by the population both from hospital pharmacies and ambulant or street vendors, followed by quinine tablets. Lumefantrine blood concentrations from widespread exposure during high malaria transmission may thus be playing a role as a directional driver in the emergence of Pfmdr1-N86 alleles in Cameroon [21]. In addition, the population wide use of multiple first line drugs in malaria control programs seems to be advantageous in this context, in which one artemisinin combination drives the emergence of parasites that are susceptible to the alternative combination [41]. In this case, the policy option to use ASAQ and AL as an alternative seems justified. However, there is a strong need to continue monitoring genetic changes associated with resistance to these drugs.
The monitoring of the Pfdhps gene is important to guide policies in malaria chemoprevention in pregnancy and in intermittent preventive treatment in infants and children. In Cameroon, SP is used as a prophylactic treatment for pregnant women while it forms one of the base in the combination used in seasonal malaria chemoprevention [42] in the two northern regions of Cameroon. In Cameroon, most of the studies done to evaluate this resistance is on the pregnant women and children. the present study focused on adults. The prevalence of the codon A437G of the Pfdhps genotype was 75.6%, for the mutant genotype, 3.0% for both genotype and 21.4% for the wild type in the total population. This prevalence is higher than what we found sampling in 2018 (61%, unpublished), much higher than what was found along the slopes of mount Cameroon with samples collected in 2013–2014 [43]. The timing of sample collection might have had some impact on the difference. A recently published study in Dschang found that 59% of parasites carried the dhps-437G mutation while our study with much recent sample collection (2020) found significantly much more. This may not only reflect the differences in methods used to assess the mutations but may be growing evidence of an expansion of dhps-A437G mutant parasites in the region. Our results are also similar to those obtained by Chauvin et al, [44] who reported a 76% prevalence of this mutation among pregnant women who had been on SP prophylaxis in Yaoundé. While the sampling was done between 2010 and 2011, the results highlight the possibility that there has been an increase in the prevalence of this mutation in the general population, especially in high transmission areas. Recent studies have reported that the pfdhps 437G has been increasing. Studies across West and central Africa, in neighboring Nigeria and in Zambia have reported high prevalence of this mutation among clinical P. falciparum samples [26, 45, 46]. Similar findings were reported by Ndong-Ngomo et al. [25], who obtained a prevalence of 67% for the dhps-437G mutation 3 years after policy change to ACTs in Gabon. In some areas of seasonal malaria chemoprevention, more than 80% of the mutation has also reported [47]. There appears not to be a significant difference between the prevalence of the mutation in SMC eligible (3 months- 5 years) children and the general population given the rates found in an area of seasonal malaria chemoprevention in Senegal [48]. This high prevalence of the mutation 437G in Pfdhps may indicate that the P. falciparum parasite populations remain subject to high drug pressure and have the potential to evolve to more resistant pfdhfr/Pfdhps mutant in the near future, particularly in chemoprophylaxis programs that employ sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine. Drug pressure, in our context, might be resulting from easy access to these drugs by a population with high self-medication rates. The semi-urban setting of Ngounso lies along a trajectory that links Cameroon to Nigeria through informal trade routes. The prevalence of mutations in Ngounso village was much higher than in Dschang; likely explained by increased access and exposure to SP owing to its proximity to trade routes with Nigeria where drugs of questionable quality may be easily procured. A quantification of the tonnage of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine/chloroquine in the two localities might throw more light into this assertion. It is possible that easy access from neighbouring Nigeria might be a determinant of the higher proportion of dhps-437G bearing parasites in this study. In addition, differences in malaria transmission intensity [49] between the two study sites resulting from differences in altitude could account for the increased proportion of circulating parasites bearing resistance alleles in Ngounso. Although studies have shown that even in the presence of the quintuple mutation, SP maintains its efficacy in pregnancy, the search for a viable alternative is increasingly important.
The 581G mutation in Pfdhps plays an important modulatory role in Sulphadoxine resistance. It has been found to reduce efficacy in preventing malaria in pregnant women, as the efficacy of SP in IPT is understood by parasites carrying the A581G mutations [50]. This is consistent with the work of kateera et al (2013) in Rwanda who demonstrated that parasites carrying the A581G mutation were associated with low birth weight infants and increased morbidity in patients receiving SP. This mutation, though, did not appear to affect parasitaemia. The 581G resistance-conferring allele was found in 19.3% of all circulating parasites in our study, being higher in Ngounso than in Dschang. It has been shown to vary widely in areas of seasonal malaria chemoprevention [47] settings. It occurs alongside the 540E mutation in East Africa but not in West Africa [15]. Although its effects have been demonstrated authoritatively in pregnancy [50, 51], it is very important, given the 19.3% prevalence we found in our study, to monitor the evolution of this mutation in the study areas and in the wider transmission settings. When we constructed biallelic (Pfdhps A437G-A581G) haplotypes at these dhps loci we found that the double mutant GG was in 19.3% (43/222) indicating all dhps-437G parasites also contained the 581G mutation. These mutations that result in the replacement of Alanine (A) by Glycine (G) in the codons 437 and 581 indicates more widespread occurrence of mutations in other gene loci which warrants more studies. The National Malaria Control Program envisages the implementation of IPTi/IPTc as a strategy to curb the high prevalence of malaria in this age group. It is therefore an additional reason why surveillance of these mutations should be part of the deployment and future monitoring and evaluation strategy.
This study has a limitation. We did not genotype for more loci associated with drug resistance. Several studies have shown that, especially in high transmission areas, relevant pfdhfr mutations have reached fixation. A body of evidence shows this. A recent assessment of the dhfr mutations in one of the study sites highlights this [52] as well as unpublished data from the authors in several regions in Cameroon. Although the Leu-164 mutation of the dhfr gene could be of interest, it is very rare in west/central Africa. Evaluating status of mutations in more loci from these genes or in other identified and validated genes would add evidence into the occurrence and the role of new and known markers in conferring resistance to antimalarial drugs.
5. Conclusion
This study shows a population of parasites predominantly wild type for PfcrtK76T and Pfmdr1-N86Y but predominantly mutants for dhpsA437G and dhpsA581G consistent with findings from other studies. The proportion of the double mutant GG at dhps437 and dhps581 highlights the need to further characterize the whole panel of known and new markers of SP resistance to support the routine monitoring of chemoprevention programs such as seasonal malaria chemoprevention and perennial malaria chemoprevention of malaria in Cameroon.
Consent for publication
Information on potential publication of anonymised data was included in the consenting process in the information sheet. All participants were aware and consented to publication of the data reported in this manuscript.
Availability of data
All supporting data are within the manuscript and its supplementary tables.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Funding
This research was funded in whole, or in part, by the Wellcome Trust [107741/A/15/Z] and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, with support from the Developing Excellence in Leadership, Training and Science in Africa (DELTAS Africa) programme. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Declarations
Author contribution statement
Innocent Mbulli Ali: Conceived and designed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper.
Pacome Valery Kom Tchuenkam: Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper.
Sandra Sob Tagomo, Masamba Hornela: Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data.
Marcel Nyuylam Moyeh, Emmanuel Nfor Nfor, Akindeh Mbuh Nji, Germaine Ekobo Ekoyol: Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data.
Calvino Tah Fomboh, William Dorian Nana: Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data.
Jean-Paul Chedjou Kengne, Peter Thelma Ngwa Niba: Analyzed and interpreted the data.
Dorothy Fosah Achu: Conceived and designed the experiments; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data.
Jude Daiga Bigoga: Conceived and designed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data.
Wilfred Fon Mbacham: Conceived and designed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data.
Funding statement
Dr Innocent Mbulli Ali was supported by Malaria Research Capacity Development in West and Central Africa (MARCAD) Consortium through the Developing Excellence in Leadership, Training and Science (DELTAS) Africa Initiative [grant # DEL-15–010].
Data availability statement
Data included in article/supp. material/referenced in article.
Declaration of interest's statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
No additional information is available for this paper.
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank the hospital authorities of the Dschang District Hospital and the Ngounso Integrated health Centre of the Cameroon Baptist Convention Health Services. We also wish to thank all participants for their time and willingness to be part of the study.
Contributor Information
Innocent Mbulli Ali, Email: dr.alinn200@gmail.com.
Wilfred Fon Mbacham, Email: wfmbacham@yahoo.com.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is the supplementary data related to this article:
Ali et al_Heliyon_Supplemental Material HELIYON-D-21-10565.
References
- 1.WHO . Vol. 299. World Health Organisation; Geneva: 2020. World Malaria Report 2020: 20 Years of Global Progress and Challenges; p. 299. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Winstanley P., Ward S., Snow R., Breckenridge A. Therapy of falciparum malaria in sub-Saharan Africa: from molecule to policy. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Jul. 2004;17(3):612–637. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.3.612-637.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Plowe C.V. Combination therapy for malaria: mission accomplished? Clin. Infect. Dis. Apr. 2007;44(8):1075–1077. doi: 10.1086/512743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.White N.J. Antimalarial drug resistance. J. Clin. Invest. Apr. 2004;113(8):1084–1092. doi: 10.1172/JCI21682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ashley E. The threat of antimalarial drug resistance. Int. J. Infect. Dis. Apr. 2016;45:15. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lusingu J., Seidlein L. Challenges in malaria control in Sub-Saharan Africa: the vaccine perspective. Tanzan. J. Health Res. Aug. 2009;10(4) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sibley C.H., et al. Pyrimethamine–sulfadoxine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum: what next? Trends Parasitol. Dec. 2001;17(12):582–588. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(01)02085-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Niba P.T.N., et al. Drug resistance markers within an evolving efficacy of anti-malarial drugs in Cameroon: a systematic review and meta-analysis (1998–2020) Malar. J. Dec. 2021;20(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03543-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.NMCP . National Malaria Control Program; MINSANTE: 2006. Situation of Malaria Control Progress. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Menard D., Dondorp A. Antimalarial drug resistance: a threat to malaria elimination. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. Jul. 2017;7(7):a025619. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a025619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Uwimana A., et al. Emergence and clonal expansion of in vitro artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum kelch13 R561H mutant parasites in Rwanda. Nat. Med. Oct. 2020;26(10):1602–1608. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1005-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dondorp A.M., et al. Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N. Engl. J. Med. Jul. 2009;361(5):455–467. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ashley E.A., et al. Spread of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N. Engl. J. Med. Jul. 2014;371(5):411–423. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1314981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Packard R.M. The origins of antimalarial-drug resistance. N. Engl. J. Med. Jul. 2014;371(5):397–399. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1403340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Okell L.C., Griffin J.T., Roper C. Mapping sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in infected humans and in parasite populations in Africa. Sci. Rep. Dec. 2017;7(1):7389. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06708-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Anderson T.J.C., Roper C. The origins and spread of antimalarial drug resistance: lessons for policy makers. Acta Trop. Jun. 2005;94(3):269–280. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2005.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mita T. Origins and spread of pfdhfr mutant alleles in Plasmodium falciparum. Acta Trop. Jun. 2010;114(3):166–170. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vinayak S., et al. Origin and evolution of sulfadoxine resistant Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Pathog. Mar. 2010;6(3):e1000830. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Alifrangis M., et al. Independent origin of Plasmodium falciparum antifolate Super-resistance, Uganda, Tanzania, and Ethiopia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. Aug. 2014;20(8):1280–1286. doi: 10.3201/eid2008.131897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pearce R.J., et al. Multiple origins and regional dispersal of resistant dhps in African Plasmodium falciparum malaria. PLoS Med. Apr. 2009;6(4):e1000055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Otienoburu S.D., et al. Selection of Plasmodium falciparum pfcrt and pfmdr1 polymorphisms after treatment with artesunate–amodiaquine fixed dose combination or artemether–lumefantrine in Liberia. Malar. J. Dec. 2016;15(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1503-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Djimdé A., et al. A molecular marker for chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria. N. Engl. J. Med. Jan. 2001;344(4):257–263. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200101253440403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wernsdorfer W.H., Noedl H. Molecular markers for drug resistance in malaria: use in treatment, diagnosis and epidemiology. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. Dec. 2003;16(6):553–558. doi: 10.1097/00001432-200312000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Eyase F.L., et al. The role of Pfmdr1 and pfcrt in changing chloroquine, amodiaquine, mefloquine and lumefantrine susceptibility in western-Kenya P. Falciparum samples during 2008–2011. PLoS One. May 2013;8(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ndong Ngomo J.-M., Mawili-Mboumba D.P., M’Bondoukwe N.P., Nikiéma Ndong Ella R., Bouyou Akotet M.K. Vol. 2016. Malaria Research and Treatment; Apr. 2016. Increased Prevalence of Mutant Allele Pfdhps 437G and Pfdhfr Triple Mutation in Plasmodium Falciparum Isolates from a Rural Area of Gabon, Three Years after the Change of Malaria Treatment Policy; pp. 1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhao L., et al. Widespread resistance mutations to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in malaria parasites imported to China from Central and Western Africa. Int. J. Parasitol.: Drugs Drug Resist. Apr. 2020;12:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2019.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Veiga M.I., et al. Globally prevalent PfMDR1 mutations modulate Plasmodium falciparum susceptibility to artemisinin-based combination therapies. Nat. Commun. Sep. 2016;7(1):11553. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Windle S.T., et al. Evidence for linkage of pfmdr1, pfcrt, and pfk13 polymorphisms to lumefantrine and mefloquine susceptibilities in a Plasmodium falciparum cross. Int. J. Parasitol.: Drugs Drug Resist. Dec. 2020;14:208–217. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2020.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Plowe C.V., Djimde A., Bouare M., Doumbo O., Wellems T.E. Pyrimethamine and proguanil resistance-conferring mutations in Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase: polymerase chain reaction methods for surveillance in Africa. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. Jun. 1995;52(6):565–568. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.52.565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Duraisingh M.T., et al. Evidence for selection for the tyrosine-86 allele of the pfmdr 1 gene of Plasmodium falciparum by chloroquine and amodiaquine. Parasitology. Mar. 1997;114(3):205–211. doi: 10.1017/s0031182096008487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wurtz N., et al. Prevalence of molecular markers of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance in Dakar, Senegal. Malar. J. 2012;11(1):197. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mbugi E.V., Mutayoba B.M., Malisa A.L., Balthazary S.T., Nyambo T.B., Mshinda H. Drug resistance to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine in Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Mlimba, Tanzania. Malar. J. Dec. 2006;5(1):94. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-5-94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gesase S., et al. High resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine in northern Tanzania and the emergence of dhps resistance mutation at codon 581. PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4569, Feb. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Balogun S.T., Sandabe U.K., Bdliya D.N., Adedeji W.A., Okon K.O., Fehintola F.A. Asymptomatic falciparum malaria and genetic polymorphisms of Pfcrt K76T and Pfmdr1 N86Y among almajirai in northeast Nigeria. J Infect Dev Ctries. Mar. 2016;10(3):290–297. doi: 10.3855/jidc.6853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Berzosa P., et al. Profile of molecular mutations in pfdhfr, pfdhps, pfmdr1, and pfcrt genes of Plasmodium falciparum related to resistance to different anti-malarial drugs in the Bata District (Equatorial Guinea) Malar. J. Dec. 2017;16(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1672-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Laufer M.K., Takala-Harrison S., Dzinjalamala F.K., Stine O.C., Taylor T.E., Plowe C.V. Return of chloroquine-susceptible falciparum malaria in Malawi was a reexpansion of diverse susceptible parasites. J. Infect. Dis. Sep. 2010;202(5):801–808. doi: 10.1086/655659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Achungu C.R., Nkuo-Akenji T., Tobias A., Samuel W. Re-emergence of chloroquine sensitive Plasmodium falciparum after several years of chloroquine withdrawal in Bamenda. North West Cameroon. 2018;6 [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bwire G.M., Ngasala B., Mikomangwa W.P., Kilonzi M., Kamuhabwa A.A.R. Detection of mutations associated with artemisinin resistance at k13-propeller gene and a near complete return of chloroquine susceptible falciparum malaria in Southeast of Tanzania. Sci. Rep. Dec. 2020;10(1):3500. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60549-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lu F., et al. Return of chloroquine sensitivity to Africa? Surveillance of African Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance through malaria imported to China. Parasites Vectors. Dec. 2017;10(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2298-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dokomajilar C., Nsobya S.L., Greenhouse B., Rosenthal P.J., Dorsey G. Selection of Plasmodium falciparum pfmdr1 alleles following therapy with artemether-lumefantrine in an area of Uganda where malaria is highly endemic. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. May 2006;50(5):1893–1895. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.5.1893-1895.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Boni M.F., Smith D.L., Laxminarayan R. Benefits of using multiple first-line therapies against malaria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. Sep. 2008;105(37):14216–14221. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804628105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Antonio-Nkondjio C., et al. Review of malaria situation in Cameroon: technical viewpoint on challenges and prospects for disease elimination. Parasites Vectors. Dec. 2019;12(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3753-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Apinjoh T.O., et al. Molecular markers for artemisinin and partner drug resistance in natural Plasmodium falciparum populations following increased insecticide treated net coverage along the slope of mount Cameroon: cross-sectional study. Infect Dis Poverty. Dec. 2017;6(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0350-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chauvin P., et al. Prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum parasites resistant to sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine in pregnant women in Yaoundé, Cameroon: emergence of highly resistant pfdhfr/pfdhps alleles. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015;70(9):2566–2571, Sep. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sitali L., et al. Surveillance of molecular markers for antimalarial resistance in Zambia: polymorphism of Pfkelch 13, Pfmdr1 and Pfdhfr/Pfdhps genes. Acta Trop. Dec. 2020;212:105704. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Quan H., et al. High multiple mutations of Plasmodium falciparum-resistant genotypes to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine in Lagos, Nigeria. Infect Dis Poverty. Dec. 2020;9(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00712-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Grais R.F., et al. Molecular markers of resistance to amodiaquine plus sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine in an area with seasonal malaria chemoprevention in south central Niger. Malar. J. Dec. 2018;17(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2242-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lo A.C., et al. Prevalence of molecular markers of drug resistance in an area of seasonal malaria chemoprevention in children in Senegal. Malar. J. Dec. 2013;12(1):137. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Talisuna A.O., Okello P.E., Erhart A., Coosemans M., D’Alessandro U. Intensity of malaria transmission and the spread of Plasmodium falciparum–resistant malaria: a review of epidemiologic field evidence. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. Dec. 2007;77(6):170–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chico R.M., et al. Influence of malaria transmission intensity and the 581G mutation on the efficacy of intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 2015;20(12):1621–1633, Dec. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Taylor S.M., et al. Interactions between antenatal sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum parasites, and delivery outcomes in Malawi. J. Infect. Dis. Jul. 2020;222(4):661–669. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.L’Episcopia M., et al. Targeted deep amplicon sequencing of antimalarial resistance markers in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Cameroon. Int. J. Infect. Dis. Jun. 2021;107:234–241. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Ali et al_Heliyon_Supplemental Material HELIYON-D-21-10565.
Data Availability Statement
All supporting data are within the manuscript and its supplementary tables.
Data included in article/supp. material/referenced in article.
Declaration of interest's statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
No additional information is available for this paper.


