Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Nov 28;17(11):e0277909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277909

Acute influence of an adaptive sporting event on quality of life in veterans with disabilities

Alexis N Sidiropoulos 1,*,#, Jonathan J Glasberg 1,#, Timothy E Moore 2, Leif M Nelson 3,#, Jason T Maikos 1,#
Editor: Yih-Kuen Jan4
PMCID: PMC9704555  PMID: 36441761

Abstract

Veterans with disabilities can experience poor quality of life following military service due to the associated negative physical and psychological ramifications. However, participation in physical activities has shown to induce both physical and mental benefits and improve the quality of life of this population. Adaptive sports, an innovative approach to address the unique physical and psychosocial needs of veterans with disabilities, are becoming more widely used as a rehabilitation tool to improve the quality of life for these veterans. This study aimed to determine the acute influence of participation in a single-day, veteran-based, adaptive kayaking and sailing event on the perceived overall health, quality of life, and quality of social life of veterans with varying disabilities. It was hypothesized that all three categories and the sum score of quality of life would reflect a positive acute response after participation in the community-based physical activity event. Veterans responded to three quality of life-related questions using a 5-point Likert scale before and directly after participating in the event. Findings indicated that an adaptive sporting event can have an acute positive influence on the quality of life of veteran participants, with improvements observed in all three categories of perceived quality of life. Therefore, it is advantageous for the whole-health rehabilitation of veterans with disabilities for the Department of Veterans Affairs to continue to provide opportunities for veterans to participate in non-traditional, community-based activities.

Introduction

Individuals with disabilities often experience lower quality of life (QoL) compared to those without a disability [1,2]. In particular, veterans with disabilities can experience further diminished QoL due to adverse physical and psychological consequences of military service [3]. However, participation in physical activities for individuals with disabilities has been strongly linked with high QoL, as physical activity provides both physical and mental benefits [4,5]. The physical benefits of participation include advanced cardiac performance, improved tendon and muscle strength and flexibility, and higher metabolic capacity [6]. Studies have also indicated significant improvements in psychosocial well-being of individuals with disabilities after participation in physical activities [7], including reduction in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms [810], as well as improved affect and well-being [10].

Veterans with disabilities often face unique challenges. Mental health disorders, often stemming from PTSD, are a primary concern for clinicians at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) due to the high prevalence in the veteran population [11]. Tanielian and Jaycox [12] estimated that 31% of veterans returning from Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) suffer from PTSD. Veterans with physical disabilities, such as amputation, traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury/disorder (SCI/D), are also at risk for adverse psychosocial outcomes, including high rates of initial-onset depression [13], as well as significant levels of anxiety and social isolation [14]. TBI frequently adversely affects emotional well-being, life satisfaction, and community integration [15]. It is estimated that over 200,000 veterans from all eras have been treated across the VA healthcare system with some form of TBI, with over 50,000 of those from OEF and OIF [16]. Individuals with SCI/D can also have compromised aspects of psychosocial well-being, social participation, and overall QoL [17].

Innovative approaches to address the unique physical and psychosocial needs of veterans with disabilities include participation in adaptive sports. Utilizing complementary therapies and modalities to supplement traditional clinical pathways improve rehabilitation outcomes in multiple domains. As such, adaptive sports are a growing rehabilitation tool for individuals with disabilities [18] due to both the physical and psychosocial benefits of participation [1921] and has been linked to higher QoL [22]. VA has recognized the positive correlation between QoL and participation in recreational activities and has made adaptive sports a major focus of non-traditional clinical care in recent years [18].

Compared to sedentary individuals with disabilities, those who participate in adaptive sports indicate better QoL, greater happiness and general satisfaction with their life, improved vitality and cardiovascular health, and a substantially increased self-efficacy [2325]. Large-scale, week-long rehabilitation events held by VA, such as the National Veterans Wheelchair Games, which is a multi-event sporting program for veterans who use wheelchairs, and the National Disabled Veterans Winter Sports Clinic, an adaptive skiing event for veterans with disabilities, report increased physical health and perceived QoL from participants [26]. Individuals who participate in adaptive sports experience fewer days of pain, anxiety, depression, and sleeplessness, and less severe secondary health conditions [2], many of which are symptoms commonly experienced by veterans [19]. However, a gap in the literature remains, as the acute response to such events has yet to be evaluated. This potential response is important to identify, as it can allow veterans and other individuals with disabilities to experience an improvement in QoL without the required commitment of long-term physical activity. Commitment to participate in a one-day adaptive sporting event may provide an opportunity for more veterans to experience an improvement in QoL, as a one-day event may be more feasible in terms of logistics and motivation for these individuals.

The aim of this study was to determine the acute influence of participation in a single-day, veteran-based, adaptive kayaking and sailing event on QoL in three categories: Perceived Overall Health, Perceived QoL, and Perceived Quality of Social Life (QoSL). Veterans were asked to respond to qualitative surveys regarding their perceived QoL before and after participation in a group adaptive sporting event. It was hypothesized that a positive acute response would be evidenced in all three categories and a QoL sum score after veterans with disabilities participated in a community-based physical activity event.

Methods

Participants

This study was a retrospective medical-chart review and included data from veterans who participated in a one-day adaptive kayaking and sailing event, Heroes on the Hudson, in either 2018 or 2019. This retrospective analysis was approved by the VA New York Harbor Healthcare System Institutional Review Board (IRB). A waiver of documentation of informed consent was granted by the IRB due to the retrospective nature of the data analysis. Therefore, no written or verbal consent was obtained from veteran participants. Veterans of all abilities were eligible to participate and all veterans who registered for the event were enrolled. Medical diagnoses included: amputation of the upper or lower limb, visual impairment, SCI/D, TBI, mental health conditions, and general, non-classified medical conditions. All participants received medical clearance from their primary care or rehabilitation specialty care provider prior to participation.

Adaptive kayaking and sailing event

Heroes on the Hudson is an annual one-day adaptive maritime sporting event for New York and New Jersey veterans with disabilities designed to progress rehabilitation through sports therapy and therapeutic recreation out of the clinic and into the community. This study includes data collected from two events (2018 and 2019). During that time, individuals with disabilities received interdisciplinary care, which included professional instruction on sailing and kayaking through VA community partners, along with support from associated VA clinical and medical providers. Participants socialized and engaged in two hours of kayaking and sailing each. Sailing activities consisted of groups of four or five participants per sailboat, while participants used single or tandem kayaks as part of a larger group for kayaking activities. All equipment and instruction were modifiable to support the veterans of varying abilities.

Outcome measures

Demographic and injury-related variables were collected, including age, sex, military service era, and disability diagnosis. The QoL survey implemented in this study represents a modified subsection of a validated survey (The Influence on Quality of Life Scale) that evaluates the influence of QoL in athletes with disabilities [2,27]. The instrument (Fig 1) asked veterans to rate, on a 5-point Likert scale, the influence their participation had on 3 items: perceived overall health, perceived QoL, and perceived QoSL. Responses could range from “Very Poor” to “Very Good”. Validity and reliability were calculated for a combined QoL sum score comprised of the three items. Additionally, previous literature has shown that use of this survey for athletes with disabilities showed evidence of construct validity and an acceptable internal consistency (alpha = 0.87) [2]. Hard copies of surveys were distributed at the event site to participants both pre- and post-participation in the Heroes on the Hudson event.

Fig 1. Survey utilized pre- and post-participation in Heroes on the Hudson event.

Fig 1

Statistical analysis

To evaluate the impact of the event on participant QoL, a combined QoL sum score of the three individual items was calculated for the pre- and post-surveys of each participant. A one-factor Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test validity and reliability of the QoL sum score. The QoL sum score was then analyzed for differences in pre-post survey scores using Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Additionally, pre-post scores for individual items were also compared using Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Furthermore, an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used to evaluate which participant characteristics correlated with QoL. This model predicted the post-survey QoL sum score of participants using the following predictors: Diagnosis, Military Service Era, Age, Sex, and Pre-survey QoL sum score. The increased flexibility in the relationship between the pre- and post-survey QoL sum scores allows this type of regression model to be more effective than other possible methods (e.g., using change in score as a response) [28]. ANCOVA models were also fitted separately on each QoL item. The proportion of variance explained by each predictor (η2, a measure of the amount of variance in a dependent variable that can be explained by one or more independent variables) was used as a measure of the effect size for each of the model predictors. All statistical tests were performed in R 4.1.0 (R Core Team, 2021) [29] and significance was set at p<0.01.

Results

Validity and reliability

The QoL sum score indicated good reliability (αrel = 0.9) and validity (average variance extracted, AVE = 0.85). All three items loaded significantly onto the single latent variable (Standardized Coefficients > 0.85, p <0.0001). The average inter-item correlation, based on Spearman Rank correlations for the pre-survey QoL sum score, was 0.77, and 0.6 for the post-survey QoL sum score, indicating a relatively high overlap between questions. Overall, these results suggest that combining the single QoL items into a summed QoL score is appropriate.

Participant characteristics

Between 2018–2019, 92 veterans participated in a Heroes on the Hudson event and 58 of those participants completed both the pre- and post-survey, indicating that 63% of participants were willing and able to answer the survey questions. Table 1 describes the participant characteristics for those that provided all requested demographic information (n = 52). ANCOVA results suggested no differences in participant characteristics were identified between QoL sum scores (p > 0.01 for all demographic covariates). However, when individual questions were evaluated using ANCOVA, a significant difference between males and females (F1,36 = 6.37, p = 0.02) indicated that males, on average, had higher post-survey Overall Health scores than females. However, sex only explained relatively little (5%, η2 = 0.05) of the variation in post-survey score. No significant differences in demographic variables were identified for QoL or QoSL.

Table 1. Participant characteristics.

Characteristics Number of Participants
Military Service Era
    Vietnam/Korea 18 (34.6%)
    OEFa/OIFb 20 (38.5%)
    Post-Vietnam 6 (11.5%)
    Gulf 8 (15.4%)
Diagnosis
    Mental Health 20 (38.5%)
    Amputation 5 (9.6%)
    Visual Impairment 5 (9.6%)
    General Medical 9 (17.3%)
    SCI/Dc 7 (13.5%)
    TBId 5 (9.6%)
    Missing 1 (1.9%)
Sex
    Male 42 (80.5%)
    Female 10 (19.2%)
Age
    Mean(Standard Deviation) 57.0 (15.0)
    Median [Min, Max] 57.0 [27.0, 87.0]
    Missing 3 (5.8%)

aOEF: Operation Enduring Freedom.

bOIF: Operation Iraqi Freedom.

cSCI/D: Spinal Cord Injury/Disorder.

dTBI: Traumatic Brain Injury.

Pre-post survey score analysis

QoL sum scores increased from pre- to post-event, as indicated by an increase in the median and mean values in the group after participation (Fig 2), which was supported with a Wilcoxon signed rank test (Z = -4.09, p <0.0001). Individual items of Overall Health (Z = -3.27, p = 0.0011), QoL (Z = -3.18, p = 0.0015), and QoSL (Z = -3.61, p = 0.0003) also indicated significant improvements after participating in the adaptive sporting event (Fig 3).

Fig 2. Boxplot of Pre- and Post-QOL sum scores.

Fig 2

Points show individual participant data, jittered for clarity. Red dots represent means. Asterisks represent significant differences between pre- and post-survey results.

Fig 3. Pre- and post-scores on the acute influence of participation in the Heroes on the Hudson event on Overall Health, QoL, and QoSL.

Fig 3

QoL: Quality of Life. QoSL: Quality of Social Life. Asterisks represent significant differences between pre- and post-survey results. Points show individual participant data, jittered for clarity. Red dots represent means. Asterisks represent significant differences between pre- and post-survey results.

Table 2 describes the acute changes in influence of each individual item: Overall Health (Table 2A), QoL (Table 2B) and QoSL (Table 2C). The diagonal dark gray area highlights the individual scores that did not change from pre- to post-survey (e.g., pre-score of 3 and a post-score of 3). Scores above the diagonal, shown in light gray, represent those that improved post-event (e.g., pre-score of 2 and a post-score of 4). Scores below the diagonal, without highlight, represent those that decreased post-event (e.g., pre-score of 4 and post-score of 3). Note that most individuals either did not change or improved their scores after participating in the event. For example, eight participants reported an increase from four to five in the QoL item.

Table 2. Survey responses.

A. Overall Health Score Post-Survey Scores
1 2 3 4 5
Pre-Survey Scores 1 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 1 1 0
3 0 0 3 6 0
4 0 0 0 17 6
5 0 0 0 1 17
B. Quality of Life Score Post-Survey Scores
1 2 3 4 5
Pre-Survey Scores 1 0 0 0 1 0
2 0 0 0 3 0
3 0 0 2 7 0
4 0 0 1 11 8
5 0 0 0 3 16
C. Quality of Social Life Score Post-Survey Scores
1 2 3 4 5
Pre-Survey Scores 1 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 3 0 2 2
3 0 0 1 5 3
4 0 0 1 11 7
5 0 0 0 1 16

Sum score analysis

The ANCOVA model fit the data well, displaying normally distributed residuals and explaining a statistically significant and substantial portion of the variance in post-event sum score (F11,36 = 5.84, p <0.0001, R2 = 0.64, R2adj = 0.53). Pre-survey QoL sum score was the only significant predictor of post-survey QoL sum score (p <0.0001), and it explained 29% (η2 = 0.29) of the variance in post-survey score. The only other variable that contributed substantially to the variance explained in post-participation QoL sum score was Diagnosis, which explained an additional 11%, but was not statistically significant (p = 0.08).

Individual item analysis

Similar to the QoL sum scores, the strongest predictors of the individual item post-survey responses were pre-survey scores, demonstrated by the proportion of variance they explained (Overall Health: 35%, QoL: 24%, QoSL: 15%). For individual items, the only significant demographic predictor was Sex, which was a predictor for Overall Health post score. A marginally significant difference between males and females (F1,36 = 6.37, p = 0.02) was identified, with males having on average, higher post-participation Overall Health scores when adjusting for pre-participation score, age, diagnosis and military service era. Sex, however, only explains 5% of the variation in post-participation.

Discussion

Veterans experienced an acute positive influence on QoL after participation in an adaptive sporting event. In support of our hypothesis, improvements in perceived overall health, QoL, QoSL, and the QoL sum score were observed after participating in Heroes on the Hudson. Additionally, this study represents a first attempt at identifying key participant characteristics that significantly correlate with QoL. There were no significant (at α = 0.01) associations between participant characteristics (Sex, Diagnosis, Age, Gender, and Military Service Era) and QoL outcomes, for either the QoL sum score or individual items. One possible explanation for this result may be due to the need to aggregate data for the smaller subgroups, particularly for diagnosis and military service era, which limited the ability to explore interaction terms in the regression model. Future analyses, with larger sub-category sample sizes, will be critical to help identify any true effects and make comparisons between participants with different characteristics. This will also allow for a greater refined grouping of participants (e.g., PTSD versus other mental health conditions), as well as the inclusion of potential interaction effects (e.g., sex and diagnosis).

Despite the small subgroup sample sizes, these results also indicated that no single sub-category was a driver for improvements in QoL, suggesting that, on average, all groups benefited equally from participation in this event regardless of diagnosis, military service era, or other unique characteristic. However, by identifying key characteristics that are predictive of changes in QoL for adaptive sporting events, future events and activities can be designed or tailored to ensure all groups of veterans, regardless of unique characteristics, can benefit to their greatest extent from participation. As such, more research will be critical in identifying which characteristics are most associated with QoL outcomes. Inclusion of follow-up questions to determine any causes of positive or negative change in QoL can also help inform future events.

Participation in an adaptive sporting event positively influences QoL

It is well-established that participation in sport activity can positively influence an individual’s perception of QoL [2]. For individuals with disabilities, physical activity can lead to feelings of functional efficiency and accomplishment, which can then foster empowerment as a response to the challenge of the activity [30]. These individuals may also develop personally empowering skills that can enhance effectiveness in other life situations [30]. Specifically, engagement in sport activities may enable individuals with disabilities to improve efficacy in activities of daily living, which can lead to further feelings of self-efficiency and improvements in QoL [23].

Social aspects of QoL for those with disabilities are also enhanced during group participation in physical activities with other participants with disabilities, as a feeling of interpersonal inclusiveness is promoted instead of isolation, which is commonly experienced by this population [30]. Due to the social value of physical activity, participation in such activities provides these individuals an opportunity to feel more integrated into society, as previous literature has reported that participation has granted them “social acceptability” [30]. This finding supports the increase in QoSL identified in this study, indicating that veterans experienced a social benefit from their participation in the Heroes on the Hudson event.

Veteran-specific advantages of participation in a physical activity event

While participating in adaptive sport activities can be difficult for individuals with disabilities, previous research has reported that limited resources are one of the major barriers of physical activity for these individuals, specifically veterans with disabilities [31,32]. Therefore, removal of barriers for adaptive sports participation is imperative to the goal of improving the QoL of sedentary individuals. When asked, veterans noted that offering physical activities with exercise partners or group classes hosted by VA would positively influence their decision to participate in such activities [10]. This increased opportunity to access physical activities can have a major perceived impact on veterans’ personal lifestyles [10], highlighting the importance of removing such barriers.

Specifically, elimination of such constraints for veterans with disabilities requires greater attention, since social isolation, commonly observed in this population, can be partly due to PTSD-related symptoms [10]. Participation in an organized sporting event can decrease anxiety and provide motivation to participate in other sporting activities [26]. Reported confidence gained by participation in these types of events have been partially attributed to the camaraderie veterans maintain with each other, as it has been shown that individuals who have commonalities are typically more comfortable with one another [26,31]. Previous research has also indicated that the increased social interaction that occurs during a physically active event with other veterans is viewed positively by veterans and can stimulate social meetings outside of the event [10]. Therefore, these experiences also provide opportunities for advancing social skills and broadening social experiences for individuals with disabilities [30]. Events such as Heroes on the Hudson, may act as an incentive for veterans with disabilities to partake in physical activities that they would not have participated in otherwise. Consequently, involvement in Heroes on the Hudson, which provides veterans with exercise partners and is hosted by the VA, can positively influence their acute QoL, as evidenced in this study.

Participation in an event such as Heroes on the Hudson also highlights the advantages of community-based activities specifically designed for veterans with disabilities. Rehabilitation for individuals with disabilities has long focused on clinic-based physical improvements; however scientific literature has recognized that both social and community reintegration are important components of rehabilitation for this population [33]. This reintegration includes a sense of belonging or acceptance, connection to other people, and involvement in leisure and community activities [34]. Community reintegration, which is especially challenging for injured veterans, is one of the ultimate goals of rehabilitative efforts [35]. The Military to Civilian Questionnaire (M2C-Q), which characterizes veterans’ perceived difficulties reintegrating back into the community life following combat [35] and the Community Reintegration for Service Members (CRIS) survey [36], which assesses community integration issues from a service person’s perspective, may prove to be imperative tools in this population [34]. These surveys may also provide vital information on how best to implement physical community activities to improve community integration in disabled veterans if administered in conjunction with an event. Notably, social participation is also a focus of the Heroes on the Hudson event and an important factor in the prediction of QoL among individuals with disabilities [32]. Both community reintegration and social participation are inherent features of the Heroes on the Hudson event, and therefore may have elevated the positive acute improvement observed in all three survey categories included in this study.

More specifically, the therapeutic potential of adaptive sports and recreation can address the needs of returning combat veterans who have acquired a disability [19], as such activities have been shown to increase perceived competence and a general sense of vigor. Previous research highlighted that physical activity positively influences mental well-being of individuals by improving emotion and mood, self-esteem, and cognitive dysfunction, while also decreasing symptoms of depression and anxiety [37]. This information is directly applicable to the population of veterans in this study, as the Mental Health subgroup was the largest of all medical conditions. Importantly, the causal link between participation in physical exercise and decreased depression has indicated that the antidepressant effect of exercise can be of a similar magnitude to that of other psychotherapy interventions [38], therefore potentially reducing the need for other, more invasive interventions. This can be useful in veterans with PTSD, who often exhibit reduced participation in regular physical activity compared to pre-PTSD time periods [39]. It has been suggested that this lack of activity contributes to the medical, cognitive, and neural comorbidities associated with sedentary behavior [39]. Previous literature has indicated that exercise may reduce PTSD symptomology in veterans, as it is associated with multiple psychological, cognitive, and neurobiological benefits and lacks the stigma of standard mental health treatment [39,40].

Long-term effects of participation

While the acute positive influence on QoL observed in this study promotes participation in events such as Heroes on Hudson, extended periods of participation in exercise and adaptive sporting activities may be associated with longer effects on QoL in veterans with disabilities. Previous literature supports this notion, as a similarly designed study investigating the impact of a 10-day adaptive sporting event on physical and psychological outcomes in veterans with disabilities indicated a rebound effect three months post-event [41]. However, longer duration of activity participation has shown lasting effects, as a study on individuals with fibromyalgia who participated in a 10-week group exercise program reported improved QoL at the 6-month follow-up [42]. Additionally, mobility-challenged older adults who participated in a 6-month exercise program reported improvements in QoL at a 5-year follow-up [43] and patients with chronic heart failure who participated in a year-long exercise program reported improved QoL in a 3-year follow up assessment [44]. While acute improvement in QoL is noteworthy in veterans with disabilities, lasting effects on perceived QoL may not be detected following a one-day adaptive sporting event. Results of this study, in combination with previous literature, support the expansion of these non-traditional community-based activities to supplement traditional clinical pathways and improve whole-health rehabilitation of veterans with disabilities. Fortunately, VA provides grant opportunities to qualifying community-based organizations to bolster programs that provide veterans with longer-term adaptive sports opportunities, allowing veterans to continue their participation in adaptive sports to improve and maintain their new level of independence, well-being, and QoL. Future research should aim to determine if the acute responses illustrated in this study can also be observed as long-term effects of participation in similar adaptive sporting events.

While physical exercise can reduce long-term anxiety tendencies, a single session has been shown to decrease short-term anxiety, anger, and tension [19]. Therefore, participation in single-session events similar to Heroes on the Hudson can positively improve mood, as evidenced by the findings of this study. Given a larger sample size, the results of this study may statistically support this notion. Consequently, an invitation and encouragement to participate in these types of events may be imperative to veterans returning from military service with disabilities for both their physical and mental rehabilitative endeavors.

Limitations and future research

This study focused on the acute impact of a community-based event on QoL using non-specific questions. Future research would benefit from including follow-up surveys (i.e., three- or six-months post-event) to determine the long-term effects of participation in a one-day adaptive sporting event. Further, more detailed information can be obtained with the use of more targeted questions regarding the emotional and mental outcomes of participation in this type of event, such as the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey. This survey is a measure of health-related QoL, as it spans physical and mental health, is reliable and valid in ambulatory individuals, and utilized in veteran patients [45]. Additionally, a larger sample size to accommodate the many sub-groups of veteran status and diagnosis would improve the utility of the study results and allow more precise estimations of the effects of participant characteristics on QoL outcomes. Although the percentage of women participants in this study (23%) represents double the current percentage of female veterans receiving care at VA (10.5%) [46], future adaptive sporting events should aim to invite and include more women participants to heighten the generalizability of the results. Lastly, this event was available only to those in more suburban communities in New York and New Jersey; therefore, results may not be generalizable to more rural parts of the country.

Future research on this topic should also aim to determine if veterans continued to participate in other adaptive sporting events within VA, with VA community partners, or other organizations within their community. This information can help identify the requirements for a long-term positive influence on the QoL of this population. Further, previous literature has noted that inclusion of family members in physical activity events also helps to improve quality of family life [27]. Thus, by inviting family members to participate alongside the veterans, the positive outcomes created by the event may extend beyond the direct influence on the individuals and expand into the family dynamic as well.

Conclusions

Participation in a community-based adaptive sports event, such as Heroes on the Hudson, led to an acute, positive influence on the QoL of individuals with disabilities. Previous research has reported that the act of participation in such an event impacts empowerment of these individuals regardless of the activity type [30]; however, due to the limited opportunities to experience outcomes associated with a physical activity event alongside other disabled individuals, the impact of participation holds even greater importance for the wellbeing of this population [32]. Though lack of statistical power did not allow consideration of interaction effects, the absence of statistical significance should not discourage these research efforts. Instead, this should be used as a reason to collect more data to help in identifying participant characteristics that are most strongly associated with observed changes in QoL. Further, a lack of statistical significance informs VA that the adaptive sporting events are helping to improve the QoL in all veterans regardless of military service era, diagnosis, or sex. Thus, it is advantageous for the whole-health rehabilitation of veterans with disabilities to participate in non-traditional, community-based activities.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the veterans for their participation in the event and survey. Additionally, the authors thank the volunteers and community partners, including Hudson River Community Sailing and Inwood Canoe Club, for their help in creating Heroes on the Hudson.

Data Availability

All relevant data and code used to generate plots and perform statistical analyses in this manuscript are available on Zenodo, accessible via: https://zenodo.org/record/7310889.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Ochoa-Morales A, Hernández-Mojica T, Paz-Rodríguez F, Jara-Prado A, Trujillo-De Los Santos Z, Sánchez-Guzmán M, et al. Quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis and its association with depressive symptoms and physical disability. Multiple sclerosis and related disorders. 2019;36:101386. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.101386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Groff DG, Lundberg NR, Zabriskie RB. Influence of adapted sport on quality of life: perceptions of athletes with cerebral palsy. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2009;31(4):318–26. doi: 10.1080/09638280801976233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ikin JF, Sim MR, McKenzie DP, Horsley KW, Wilson EJ, Harrex WK, et al. Life satisfaction and quality in Korean War veterans five decades after the war. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009;63(5):359–65. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.061986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Motl RW, Pilutti LA. The benefits of exercise training in multiple sclerosis. Nature Reviews, Neurology. 2012;8(9):487–97. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Anderson LS, Heyne LA. Physical activity for children and adults with disabilities: An issue of “amplified” importance. Disability and Health Journal. 2010;3(2):71–3. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ruegsegger G. N., & Booth F. W. Health benefits of exercise. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2018;8(7): a029694. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a029694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Day MC. The role of initial physical activity experiences in promoting posttraumatic growth in Paralympic athletes with an acquired disability. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2013;35(24):2064–72. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.805822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.LeardMann CA, Kelton ML, Smith B, Littman AJ, Boyko EJ, Wells TS, et al. Prospectively assessed posttraumatic stress disorder and associated physical activity. Public Health Rep. 2011;126(3):371–83. doi: 10.1177/003335491112600311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dustin D, Bricker N, Arave J, Wall W, Wendt G. The Promise of River Running as a Therapeutic Medium for Veterans Coping with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Therapeutic Recreation Journal. 2011;14(4):326–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Otter L, Currie J. A long time getting home: Vietnam Veterans’ experiences in a community exercise rehabilitation programme. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(1):27–34. doi: 10.1080/09638280410001645067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Seal K, Bertenthal D, Miner C, Sen S, Marmar C. Bringing the war back home. Mental health disorders among 103788 US veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan seen at department of veterans affairs facilities. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2007;167:476–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tanielian T, Jaycox LH. Invisible wounds of war: Psychological and cognitive injuries, their consequences, and services to assist recovery. Rand Coorporation 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Williamson GM, Schultz R, Bridges MW, Behan AM. Social and psychological factors in adjustment to limb amputation. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 1994;9(5). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sahu A, Sagar R, Sarkar S, Sagar S. Psychological effects of amputation: A review of studies from India. Industrial psychiatry journal. 2016;25(1):4. doi: 10.4103/0972-6748.196041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hawkins AT, Pallangyo AJ, Herman AM, Schaumeier MJ, Smith AD, Hevelone ND, et al. The effect of social integration on outcomes after major lower extremity amputation. Journal of vascular surgery. 2016;63(1):154–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bagalman E. Traumatic Brain Injury Among Veterans. In: Service CR, editor. CRS Report for Congress; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aaby A, Ravn SL, Kasch H, Andersen TE. The associations of acceptance with quality of life and mental health following spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2020;58(2):130–48. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0379-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee KK, Uihlein MJ. Adaptive sports in the rehabilitation of the disabled veterans. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics. 2018;30(1):289–99. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2018.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lundberg N, Bennet J, Smith S. Outcomes of adaptive sports and recreation participation among veterans returning from combat with acquired disability. Therapeutic Recreation Journal. 2011;45(2):105–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Biddle S. Physical activity and mental health: evidence is growing. World Psychiatry. 2016;15(2):176. doi: 10.1002/wps.20331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.White RL, Babic MJ, Parker PD, Lubans DR, Astell-Burt T, Lonsdale C. Domain-specific physical activity and mental health: a meta-analysis. American journal of preventive medicine. 2017;52(5):653–66. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.12.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nemcek D. Life satisfaction of people with disabilities: A comparison between active and sedentary individuals. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2016;16(2):1084–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Diaz R, Miller EK, Kraus E, Fredericson M. Impact of adaptive sports participation on quality of life. Sports medicine and arthroscopy review. 2019;27(2):73–82. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Côté-Leclerc F, Boileau Duchesne G, Bolduc P, Gélinas-Lafrenière A, Santerre C, Desrosiers J, et al. How does playing adapted sports affect quality of life of people with mobility limitations? Results from a mixed-method sequential explanatory study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brown S, Bewernitz M, Krauss A, Summers L. Investigation of Testimonials From Participants in an Adaptive Sports and Recreation Program. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2021;75(Supplement_2):7512505120p1-p1. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sporner ML, Fitzgerald SG, Dicianno BE, Collins D, Teodorski E, Pasquina PF, et al. Psychosocial impact of participation in the National Veterans Wheelchair Games and Winter Sports Clinic. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(5):410–8. doi: 10.1080/09638280802030923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zabriskie RB. Quality of Life and Identity: The Benefits of a Community-Based Therapeutic Recreation and Adaptive Sports Program. Therapeutic Recreation Journal. 2005;39(3):176–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.O’Connell NS, Dai L, Jiang Y, Speiser JL, Ward R, Wei W, et al. Methods for analysis of pre-post data in clinical research: a comparison of five common methods. Journal of biometrics & biostatistics. 2017;8(1):1. doi: 10.4172/2155-6180.1000334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Blinde EM. Personal Empowerment Through Sport and Physical Fitness Activity: Perspectives From Male College Students with Physical and Sensory Disabilities. Journal of Sport Behavior. 1999;22(2):181–202. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Littman AJ, Boyko EJ, Thompson ML, Haselkorn JK, Sangeorzan, B., et al. Physical activity barriers and enablers in older veterans with lower-limb amputation. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2014;51:895–906. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.06.0152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Whiting ZG, Falk D, Lee J, Weinman B, Pines JM, Lee K. Community organization factors affecting veteran participation in adaptive sports. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2022;45(3):395–401. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2020.1803657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Asano M, Rushton P, Miller WC, Deathe BA. Predictors of quality of life among individuals who have a lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2008;32(2):231–43. doi: 10.1080/03093640802024955 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Brown M, Dijkers MP, Gordon WA, Ashman T, Charatz H, Cheng Z. Participation objective, participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2004;19(6):459–81. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200411000-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sayer NA, Frazier P, Orazem RJ, Murdoch M, Gravely A, Carlson KE, et al. Military to Civilian Questionnaire: A Measure of Postdeployment Community Reintegration Difficulty Among Veterans Using Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Care. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2004;24(6):660–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Resnik L, Borgia M, Pensheng N, Pirraglia PA, Jette A. Reliability, validity and administrative burden of the community reintegration of injured service members computer adaptive test (CRIS-CAT)”. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2012;12(145):1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Grant T. Physical activity and mental health: National consensus statements and guidelines for practice. London: Health Education Authority.2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cole F. Mental health and physical activity: Enabling participation. 4 ed. Lougher L, editor. Churchhill Livingstone: Edinburgh; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hegberg NJ, Hayes JP, Hayes SM. Exercise Intervention in PTSD: A Narrative Review and Rationale for Implementation. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:133. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dickstein BD, McLean CP, Mintz J, Conoscenti LM, Steenkamp MM, Benson TA, et al. Unit cohesion and PTSD symptom severity in Air Force medical personnel. Mil Med. 2010;175(7):482–6. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-09-00178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Walter K, Otis N, Del Re AC, Kohen C, Glassman L, Ober K, et al. The National Veterans Summer Sports Clinic: Change and duration of psychological outcomes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2021;55(101939):1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Giannotti E, Koutsikos K, Pigatto M, Rampudda ME, Doria A, Masiero S. Medium-/long-term effects of a specific exercise protocol combined with patient education on spine mobility, chronic fatigue, pain, aerobic fitness and level of disability in fibromyalgia. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:474029. doi: 10.1155/2014/474029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Elavsky S, McAuley E, Motl RW, Konopack JF, Marquez DX, Hu L, et al. Physical activity enhances long-term quality of life in older adults: efficacy, esteem, and affective influences. Ann Behav Med. 2005;30(2):138–45. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3002_6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Belardinelli R, Georgiou D, Cianci G, Purcaro A. Randomized, controlled trial of long-term moderate exercise training in chronic heart failure: effects on functional capacity, quality of life, and clinical outcome. Circulation. 1999;99(9):1173–82. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.9.1173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kazis LE, Miller DR, Clark J, Skinner K, Lee A, Rogers W, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients served by the Department of Veterans Affairs: results from the Veterans Health Study. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(6):626–32. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.6.626 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Adams RE, Hu Y, Figley CR, Urosevich TG, Hoffman SN, Kirchner HL, et al. Risk and protective factors associated with mental health among female military veterans: results from the veterans’ health study. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01181-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Yih-Kuen Jan

24 Jun 2022

PONE-D-22-10455Acute influence of an adaptive sporting event on quality of life in veterans with disabilitiesPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Sidiropoulos,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 08 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Yih-Kuen Jan, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

3. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Title “Acute influence of an adaptive sporting event on quality of life in veterans with disabilities “is not a interesting topic for veterans with disabilities. However, there are the following concerns in this manuscript.

1、Only 58 of those participants completed both the pre-and post-survey, 27% participants refused to answer the survey, please explain the reasons.

2、Veterans who participated in only a one-day adaptive kayaking and sailing event, time is too short. How to figure out the other reasons may lead to the differences about quality of life. Please explain it.

3、The Influence on Quality of Life Scale construct validity should be reported. Quality of life for athletes with cerebral palsy may do not suit for veterans with disabilities.

4、In the analysis, the manuscript should add age, sex and other variable as confounder variable in the analysis.

Reviewer #2: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of questionnaire data, proving that the perceived QoL of disabled veterans is immediately improved after these veterans participate in a single-day Veteran-based adaptive kayaking and sailing event. This study highlights the value of encouraging disabled veterans to participate in adaptive sports and is suitable for publication, only if the authors respond to the following questions:

1. In Line54–63 (INTRODUCTION), it seems better to pinpoint the "gap", the research gap which previous studies have left but your research will fill. For example, your research highlights the ACUTE influence of participation in A SINGLE-DAY, so is this an aspect that previous studies ignore but your research notice? If so, please elaborate on this "gap", which seems one of your novelty worth highlighting.

2. In DISCUSSION, to corroborate the current study, the authors EXTENSIVELY discuss the previous research (esp. on whether adaptive sports improve the mental health & QoL of the disabled), but it seems better to add extra information about the current study's RESULTS, among which several interesting details seem worth further discussing/explaining:

2.1 As the authors mentioned in Line148 & Table2, after participation, the OEF/OIF veterans had the greatest positive change scores, compared with veterans during other military service eras. This data is so striking that it seems better to briefly explain the possible reasons and implications for this trend.

2.2 In Table2, after participation, a decrease of QoL/QoDL was reported by veterans with orthopedic or spinal cord injury. This data is eye-catching and worth a brief discussion/explanation.

3. In REFERENCES, over 91% (43/47) of references have been published for over 5 years, thus seeming "old". It seems better to cite more RECENT references (published after 2016). Since 2016, there have been at least 60 papers in the field of "("adaptive sport*") AND disab*", such as PMID: 31046012, PMID: 32427531, and PMID: 32427531.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Zewei Zhang

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Nov 28;17(11):e0277909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277909.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


3 Oct 2022

September 29, 2022

Dr. Yih-Kuen Jan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Subject: Revision and resubmission of manuscript PONE-D-22-10455

Dear Dr. Yih-Kuen Jan,

Thank you for your email and the opportunity to revise our manuscript entitled “Acute Influence of an Adaptive Sporting Event on Quality of Life in Veterans with Disabilities”. We greatly appreciate the reviewers for their insightful comments. The manuscript has been improved after making the suggested edits.

Please find attached a point-by-point response to the reviewer’s concerns. The revision has been developed in consultation with all coauthors. We hope that you find our responses satisfactory, and that the manuscript is now acceptable for publication. We thank you for your continued interest in our research.

Sincerely,

Alexis Sidiropoulos, PhD

Department of Veterans Affairs

New York Harbor Healthcare System

Journal Requirements Addressed:

Comment 1: PLOS ONE style requirements for file naming.

Response: Following the guidance, we have created separate files for manuscript figures with appropriate file types and names.

Comment 2: Statement of where the minimal data set underlying the results described in the manuscript can be found.

Response: We have included information in the Data Availability Statement indicating that the minimal data set underlying the results described in this manuscript can be found in Dryad Digital Repository. Dryad is a curated resource that makes the data underlying scientific publications discoverable, freely usable, and citable while promoting openly available research integrated with scholarly literature.

Comment 3: Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well.

Response: We have included additional statements within the ‘Methods’ section to clearly state that the Department of Veteran Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System Institutional Review Board waived the consent of participants for this study due to its retrospective nature.

Reviewer 1:

Comment 1: Only 58 of those participants completed both the pre- and post-survey, 27% participants refused to answer the survey, please explain the reason.

Response: We thank the reviewer for their note about the percentage of event participants that did not complete the survey. We would like to note that none of the participants refused, however there were many reasons why these participants did not complete the survey. Some examples include beginning the event without having completed the pre-survey and leaving the event without knowing that post-survey information was requested.

Comment 2: Veterans who participated in only a one-day kayaking and sailing event, time is too short. How to figure out the other reasons may lead to the differences about quality of life.

Response: In agreement with the reviewer, we list this short time period as a limitation in our study. Further, we suggest that future research should include a follow-up survey to determine if the positive acute effects on quality of life are retained long-term. Please see the “Limitation and future research” section.

Comment 3: The Influence on Quality of Life Scale construct validity should be reported. Quality of life for athletes with cerebral palsy may do not suit for veterans with disabilities.

Response: In agreement with the reviewer, statistical analyses were conducted to confirm the validity and reliability of the survey results. This information is included an additional sub-section within the “Results” termed “Validity and Reliability”.

Comment 4: In the analysis, the manuscript should add age, sex and other variable as confounder variable in the analysis.

Response: Additional statistical analyses have been conducted to identify any confounding participant characteristics. Further, a regression model fit to the data determined the contribution of each participant characteristic to the survey sum score. The additional statistical analyses are reported in the second paragraph of the “Statistical Analysis” sub-section of the “Methods” section. Please see the sub-sections under the “Results” sections entitled “Participant Characteristics” and “Sum Score Analysis”.

Reviewer 2:

Comment 1: In Line 54-63 (INTRODUCTION), it seems better to pinpoint the “gap”, the research gap which previous studies have left but your research will fill. For example, your research highlights the ACUTE influence of participation in A SINGLE-DAY, so is this an aspect that previous studies ignore but your research notice? If so, please elaborate on this “gap”, which seems one of your novelty worth highlighting.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this comment and have added information into the introduction to address the gap in the literature which this research fills. Please see lines 59-65.

Comment 2: In DISCUSSION, to corroborate the current study, the authors EXTENSIVELY discuss the previous research (esp. on whether the adaptive sports improve the mental health & QoL of the disabled), but it seems better to add extra information about the current study’s RESULTS, among which several interesting details seem worth further discussing/explaining:

2.1: As the authors mentioned in Line 148 & Table 2, after participation, the OEF/OIF veterans had the greatest positive change scores, compared with veterans during other military service eras. This data is so striking that it seems better to briefly explain the possible reasons and implications for this trend.

2.2: In Table 2, after participation, a decrease of QoL/QoSL was reported by veterans with orthopedic or spinal cord injury. This data is eye-catching and worth a brief discussion/explanation.

Response: Following the updated statistical analyses, previously discussed trends were no longer valid. However, we have included an updated discussion section from lines 196-217 to discuss the adjusted findings.

Comment 3: In REFERENCES, over 91% (43/47) of references have been published for over 5 years, thus seeming “old”. It seems better to cite more RECENT references (published after 2016). Since 2016, there have been at least 60 papers in the field of “(adaptive sport*”) AND disab*, such as PMID: 31046012, PMID: 32427531, and PMID: 3247531.

Response: In agreement with the reviewer, we have updated 11 citations in the “References” section with more recent publications. However, due to the limited research published in Veteran- and amputee-specific adaptive sports programs, some “older” references remain in the manuscript. We believe this highlights the need for further research in this field.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Letter of Response.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Yih-Kuen Jan

6 Nov 2022

Acute influence of an adaptive sporting event on quality of life in veterans with disabilities

PONE-D-22-10455R1

Dear Dr. Sidiropoulos,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Yih-Kuen Jan, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The revised manuscript have improved a lot. All authors did a lot of hard wort to revised it. I just hope to recruite more subjects in the future study.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Zewei Zhang

**********

Acceptance letter

Yih-Kuen Jan

17 Nov 2022

PONE-D-22-10455R1

Acute influence of an adaptive sporting event on quality of life in veterans with disabilities

Dear Dr. Sidiropoulos:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Yih-Kuen Jan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Letter of Response.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data and code used to generate plots and perform statistical analyses in this manuscript are available on Zenodo, accessible via: https://zenodo.org/record/7310889.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES