Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Nov 28;17(11):e0276395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276395

Prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni infection among fishermen in Busega district, Tanzania

Revocatus J L Mang’ara 1, Billy Ngasala 2, Winfrida John 2,3,*
Editor: Wannaporn Ittiprasert4
PMCID: PMC9704623  PMID: 36441724

Abstract

Background

Schistosoma (S.) mansoni infection is endemic in all regions around Lake Victoria and affects all age groups to different degrees. In most endemic areas, less attention has been paid to determining the prevalence of infection, sanitation status, and knowledge about intestinal schistosomiasis (KIS) in fishermen. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to establish the prevalence of S. mansoni infection and associated factors among fishermen in the Busega district.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among fishermen in July, 2020 in five fishing villages in the Busega district located along Lake Victoria. A total of 352 fishermen were interviewed with regard to their sanitation status and level of KIS. A single stool sample from fishermen was examined for S.mansoni eggs by using the Formalin-Ether Concentration technique. The potential factors associated with S. mansoni infection were explored using multivariable logistic regression.

Results

The prevalence of S. mansoni infection was high (65.0%) among fishermen and varied with age, whereby fishermen aged ≤36 years had the highest prevalence. Fishermen had a low level of KIS and the majority of them reported practicing open defecation during fishing (81%). These fishermen with a low level of KIS and who reported defecating in open areas during fishing had 2.8 times (95% CI: 1.0–7.2) and 2.1 times (95% CI: 1.1–3.9) higher odds of being infected with S. mansoni than those with a high level of KIS and those who did not report defecating in open areas during fishing, respectively.

Conclusion

S. mansoni infection was high among fishermen in the Busega district. Furthermore, fishermen had a low level of KIS and were reported to have defecated in open areas during fishing. Infection with S. mansoni was associated with age, a low level of KIS and open defecation behaviour during fishing. Therefore, mass drug administration (MDA) with praziquantel, health education, and sanitation behaviour change interventions were needed.

Background

Schistosomiasis is an acute and chronic parasitic disease caused by blood flukes of the genus Schistosoma [1]. Despite efforts to control transmission, more than 220 million people worldwide are infected, with 85% living in Sub-Saharan Africa, where prevalence rates exceed 50% of the local population [1].

Fishermen, irrigation workers, and women carrying out domestic activities are involved in daily contact with infested freshwater and, therefore, are at greater risk of being infected with Schistosoma larvae released by infected freshwater snails [1].

Mild infection can cause abdominal pain, diarrhea, gastrointestinal bleeding, and bloody stools. In advanced cases, it can cause hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, ascites, haematemesis, and varices, which can rapidly lead to death [2]. In fact, schistosomiasis disables more than killing. Disabling complications in children include anaemia, growth stunting, cognitive impairment, and decreased physical fitness [3].

With an estimated prevalence of schistosomiasis of 51.5%, Tanzania is the second country in sub-Saharan Africa to have a high burden of the disease after Nigeria [4]. Poor sanitation, lack of knowledge about schistosomiasis, and activities that involve high water contact like fishing are known to increase the risk of schistosomiasis [4,5].

S. mansoni infection is prevalent in all regions around Lake Victoria and affects all age groups to different degrees. The effort to control schistosomiasis is mainly relying on school-based MDA, which excludes adults at risk like fishermen [6,7]. Currently, the magnitude of infection, sanitation status, and KIS on fishermen remains unclear in most endemic areas [8,9]. Therefore, this study was carried out to determine the magnitude of S.mansoni infection and associated factors among fishermen living in the Busega district.

Materials and methods

Study design

A cross-sectional study was carried out to determine the current magnitude of S. mansoni infection and associated factors among fishermen in July, 2020.

Study population

The study population was fishermen aged above 18 years (an age group not often targeted by MDA) without a history of taking praziquantel within the last 3 months (the incubation period of schistosomiasis), and who provided written informed consent.

Study area

The study was carried out in Ihale, Nyakaboja, Kalago, Nchilu, and Fogofogo villages in the Busega district. The district was conveniently selected because it had a high prevalence of 79.2% among school-aged children [10]. The district is in the Simiyu region, located on the shores of Lake Victoria between latitude 2° 10’ and 2° 50’ South and between longitude 33° and 34° East.

Fishing is a major source of income in the district, and there are ten registered fishing boat landing sites in distinct villages such as Ijitu, Ihale, Milambi, Bulima, Nyakaboja, Mayega, Kalemela, Kalago, Nchilu, and Fogofogo [11].

Sample size

The sample size formula for estimation of a single proportion:

n=Z2P100Pε2

Where, n = Minimum sample size, Z = Standard normal deviate for given confidence level (CI) = 1.96 for a 95% CI, p = Expected proportion = 29.22% [8] and ε = Margin of error (the precision) = 5%. Calculated sample size was 318 fishermen. Assuming a 10% non-response, the resulted sample size was 353 fishermen.

Sampling

Two stage-sampling procedures were used to select villages and individual fishermen. In the first stage, five villages were selected by lottery from a list of ten villages. In the second stage, eligible fishermen from each of five selected villages were selected by a simple random sampling technique using the list of registered names of fishermen as a sampling frame.

The number of sample fishermen from each village was determined by a probability proportional to size formula: n = P*N, where, P = proportion, N = total sample size. The numbers of sample fishermen from each village were as follows: Ihale = (144/1038)353 = 49, Kalago = (106/1038)353 = 36, Nyakaboja = (92/1038)353 = 31, Nyamikoma ‘A’ = (543/1038)353 = 184, Nyamikoma ‘B’ = (153/1038)353 = 52.

Data collection tools and methods

A structured interview schedule was used, adapted from a study conducted in Yemen [12]. The schedule was translated into Kiswahili to make it suitable for the targeted group. The researcher and two trained research assistants collected data, who were accompanied by the Beach Management Unit (BMU) chairperson of the respective landing site. An interview was performed to obtain information on socio-demographic characteristics of fishermen, sanitation behavior during fishing, and their KIS. Furthermore, fishermen were asked about the ownership of latrines, and a direct observation method was used to confirm latrine availability and type.

After the interview, all participants were required to provide only one stool sample in a well- labeled sterile container. The collected samples were mixed with 10% formalin (1 part stool to 3 parts preservative) to preserve the samples and kill fecal pathogens for safety. All collected samples were placed in a box and transported to the NIMR Laboratory at Mwanza Centre, where they were processed and examined the following day.

Stool examination

An investigator examined collected stools with the assistance of two qualified and experienced laboratory technicians. For each respondent, a single stool specimen was processed using the FEC technique, and double slides were prepared for each sample to be examined under the microscope for S. mansoni eggs.

Data quality assurance

In the course of data gathering, the researcher was making a thorough spot-check of the research assistants to ensure correctness and completeness of the interview schedule and adherence to standard protocols of the checklist. Standard operating procedures (SOP) [13] were followed during specimen collection, transportation, processing, examination, and result recording under the supervision of the researcher. To verify the consistency of microscopic results, 10% of the specimens were randomly selected each day and re-examined by a researcher without prior knowledge of the results.

Data management and analysis

At the end of each day of data collection, the structured interview schedules were checked for completeness and correctness. The data was then coded before being entered into the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS for Windows, version 22.0) and cleaned for errors caused by inconsistent entry. A copy of the data sheet was stored on a separate drive to save as a backup. Then, the recorded data collection sheets were filled in and stored.

KIS was evaluated by five questions with a total of five [5] points. Knowledge scores were categorized as low (<2 points), average (2–3 points) and high (>3 points) [9]. Data on socio-demographic, infection status, latrine ownership, sanitation behaviour, and KIS were summarized as frequencies and proportions then presented in tables and charts.

Pearson’s chi-square statistical tests were used to compare proportions between groups. The unadjusted odds ratio (UOR) was estimated by bivariate logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with S. mansoni infection to be included in the multivariate logistic regression. The biological plausible factors and all factors with a P-value < 0.2 in bivariate analysis were included in the final model. Following that, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was calculated using enter method of multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine factors that were independently associated with S. mansoni infection. The associations were considered significant at P<0.05.

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance to carry out the study was obtained before conducting the study from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of MUHAS (ethics clearance no. IRB#: MUHAS-REC-04-2020-242). Permission to conduct the study in the villages was obtained from the Local authorities of Busega district. Villagers were informed about the study through a village meeting, and written consent was obtained from eligible fishermen prior to recruitment into the study by using a consent form written in Kiswahili.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants

Of the 353 eligible participants for the study, 352 fishermen from Ihale, Kalago, Nyakaboja, Nyamikoma ’A’, and Nyamikoma ’B’ village participated in the study while the one refused to participate. The median age was 35 years with the range of 18 to 74 years. Majority of the participants were males (92.6%), aged ≤36 years (57.4%), married (59.4%), with primary education (84.4%) and resided in Nyamikoma ’A’ village (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic information of fishermen participated in the study.

CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY N = 352 %
Age (years) ≤36 202 57.4
37–47 88 25
48–58 46 13.1
≥59 16 4.5
Gender Male 326 92.6
Female 26 7.4
Marital status Not married 63 17.9
Married 209 59.4
Separated/divorced/Widowed 51 14.5
Cohabiting 29 8.2
Education level Completed/Not completed primary 297 84.4
Secondary/University 55 15.6
Village Ihale 49 13.9
Kalago 36 10.2
Nyakaboja 31 8.8
Nyamikoma ’A’ 184 52.3
Nyamikoma ’B’ 52 14.8

Prevalence of S. mansoni infection stratified by socio-demographic characteristics

Majority of respondents agreed to submit their stool samples 309 (87.5%) for examination. The prevalence of S. mansoni infection was high 201(65.04%) and varied significantly by age group (P <0.001), ≤36 years being the most affected age group (Table 2).

Table 2. Prevalence of S. mansoni infection in relation to demographic characteristics.

VARIABLE CATEGORY EXAMINED (N = 309) POSITIVE (%) P-VALUE*
Age (years) ≤36 177 133(75.1) 0.000
37–47 77 41(53.2)
48–58 40 18(45.0)
≥59 15 9(60.0)
Gender Male 286 187(65.4) 0.662
Female 23 14(60.9)
Marital status Not married 54 42(77.8) 0.184
Married 183 113(61.7)
Separated/divorced/Widowed 43 28(65.1)
Cohabiting 29 18(62.1)
Education level Complete/Incomplete primary 259 167 (64.5) 0.633
Secondary/University 50 34(68.0)
Village Ihale 42 27 (64.3) 0.768
Kalago 28 20 (71.4)
Nyakaboja 28 16(57.1)
Nyamikoma ’A’ 165 110(66.7)
Nyamikoma ’B’ 46 28 (60.9)

*P-value of Pearson Chi-square (χ2) test.

Level of KIS among fishermen

The level of KIS among fishermen was low (mean knowledge score of 1.97 points). The majority of the fishermen did not know or know incorrect cause (49.4%), mode of transmission (74.7%), manifestation (90.6%) and preventive measure (71.3%) of intestinal schistosomiasis (Table 3).

Table 3. Knowledge on cause, transmission mode and clinical sign of schistosomiasis.

VARIABLE CATEGORY N = 352 %
Cause of IS Worms 178 50.6
Mosquito 14 3.9
Snails 59 16.8
Do not know 101 28.7
Mode of transmission for IS Drinking untreated water 201 57.1
Eating contaminated food 8 2.3
Walking barefooted 7 2.0
Swimming/bathing/fishing in Lake 82 23.3
Do not know 54 15.3
The main sign of IS Blood in urine 93 26.4
Blood in stools 33 9.4
Painful urination 85 24.1
Stomach ache 81 23.0
Do not know 60 17.0
Preventive measure for IS Avoid fishing barefooted, swimming or bathing in the lake 75 21.3
Avoid walking across barefooted 26 7.4
Wash hands with water and soap 7 2.0
Avoid drinking untreated water 147 41.8
Wash fruits before eating 10 2.8
Do not know 87 24.7
Treatment of IS Traditional medicine 18 5.1
Hospital medicine 263 74.7
Do not know 71 20.2

IS = Intestinal schistosomiasis.

Ownership of sanitation facilities in household and sanitation practice during fishing

Majority of fishermen had the locally designed pour flush latrines at their household and few of respondents still are using pit latrines (15.9%). Furthermore, most of the fishermen (81%) declared to defecate in open places during fishing either direct from their fishing boats or in the plastic bag then disposes it in water or in bushes along the lake (Fig 1).

Fig 1. The place mostly used for defecation during fishing activities.

Fig 1

Factors associated with S. mansoni infections among fishermen

In bivariate regression analysis, factors such as age, marital status, level of KIS and sanitation behavior were significantly associated with S. mansoni infection. In multivariate regression analysis, factors that were remained to associate with S. mansoni infection were age, low level of KIS and open defecation habit. Indeed, compare to those aged ≤ 36 years, fishermen with the age of 37–47 years and 48–58 years had 0.4 times (95% CI = 0.2–0.8) and 0.3 times (95% CI = 0.2–0.6) less likely to be infected with S. mansoni respectively. On the other hand, fishermen with low level of KIS had 2.8 times (95% CI: 1.0–7.2) higher odds of being infected with S. mansoni than those with high level of KIS. Equally, fishermen reported to defecate in open areas during fishing had 2.1 times (95% CI: 1.1–3.9) higher odds of being infected with S. mansoni than those did not reported to defecate in open areas during fishing (Table 4).

Table 4. Logistic regression analysis of infection status and risk factors.

VARIABLE CATEGORY UOR(95% CI) P-VALUE AOR(95% CI) P-VALUE
Age (years) ≤36 1 1
37–47 0.4 (0.2–0.6) 0.001 0.4 (0.2–0.8) 0.006 *
48–58 0.3 (0.1–0.6) <0.001 0.3 (0.1–0.6) 0.001 *
≥59 0.5 (0.2–1.5) 0.207 0.5 (0.2–1.5) 0.218
Gender Male 1 1
Female 0.8 (0.3–2.0) 0.663 1.3 (0.5–3.5) 0.577
Marital status Not married 1 1
Married 0.5 (0.2–0.9) 0.032 0.8 (0.4–1.8) 0.616
Separated/divorced/Widowed 0.5 (0.2–1.3) 0.17 0.9 (0.3–2.3) 0.775
Cohabiting 0.5 (0.2–1.3) 0.131 0.8 (0.3–2.3) 0.668
Education level Complete/Incomplete primary 1
Secondary/University 1.2 (0.6–2.2) 0.633
Village Ihale 1
Kalago 1.4 (0.5–3.9) 0.534
Nyakaboja 0.7 (0.3–2.0) 0.548
Nyamikoma ’A’ 1.1 (0.55–2.3) 0.771
Nyamikoma ’B’ 0.9 (0.4–2.1) 0.741
Knowledge level High 1 1
Average 1.5 (0.6–3.6) 0.401 1.5 (0.6–3.8) 0.431
Low 2.8 (1.1–7.1) 0.027 2.75 (1.0–7.2) 0.041 *
Sanitation behavior during fishing Not reported open defecation 1 1
Reported open defecation 2.2 (1.2–3.9) 0.009 2.1 (1.1–3.9) 0.026 *

*Significant factors with p-value < 0.05, AOR = Adjusted Odds Ratio, UOR = Unadjusted Odds Ratio.

Discussion

The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of S. mansoni infection and associated factors among fishermen of the Busega district. We found that fishermen had a high prevalence (65.04%) of S. mansoni infection, a low level of KIS, and were reported to practice open defecation during fishing. Furthermore, infection with S. mansoni among fishermen was associated with a low level of KIS and open defecation behavior during fishing.

The prevalence observed among fishermen in the Busega district was higher than the prevalence of 51.8% observed among adults living in fishing villages in the Mwanza region [14]. The variations in prevalence might be due to differences in study populations. Furthermore, the prevalence of S. mansoni infection among fishermen in the Busega district was higher than those of 29.2% and 15.9% reported among fishermen at Lake Hawassa in Ethiopia [8] and at Alagoasa in Brazil [12] respectively. The difference in prevalence might be due to the variation in climate, ecology, and sanitation practices of the fishermen.

The prevalence we observed in this study varied across the age groups and was higher in those ≤ 36 years old, similar to findings reported from other endemic areas of Tanzania [4]. This may be justified by the change in water contact behaviour among young adults [15]. Young people tend to change recreational swimming or playing in water bodies as they become adults and start carrying out adult roles [16]. This result supports previous studies on the need to include the adult population at risk in de-worming programs since they may serve as a potential reservoir for re-infection of treated schoolchildren [1719].

The level of KIS among fishermen was low, and an information gap exists among fishermen because most of them still hold incorrect ideas about the main signs, mode of transmission, and preventive method of intestinal schistosomiasis. The confusion about the signs and symptoms of intestinal schistosomiasis with that of urinary schistosomiasis was similar to a previous study in Swaziland [20]. Furthermore, confusion between mode of transmission and preventive method of schistosomiasis with that of soil-transmitted helminths (STH) seems to be common in many endemic communities of sub-Saharan Africa [5]. However, this misconception about the mode of transmission was found to be less pronounced in some of the schoolchildren [20,21]. As most of the interviewed fishermen were adults, they might not have received health education about schistosomiasis when they were at school.

The majority of fishermen reported defecating in open places during fishing, either in the bushes or directly from their fishing boats. Several studies have found that even a small number of infected people defecating in bodies of water can pose a significant risk of infection to all community members who come into contact with that water later [15,19].

The present study also investigated important risk factors associated with S. mansoni infection among fishermen. Age, level of KIS and sanitation habits were factors significantly associated with S. mansoni infection among fishermen.

Age was reported to be poor predictor of infection in the previous community study of Kenya [17]. Though in the present study, age was a significant predictor of infection among fishermen, whereby age > 36 years old was associated with decreased infection as compared to age ≤36 years old, similar to the previous study in Brazil [22,23]. This might be due to leisure-related activities in infected water sources among young fishermen as compared to older ones.

Surprisingly, no significant difference in infection was observed between male and female fishermen. In addition, in this study, gender was not a significant predictor for infection with S. mansoni, similar to the previous study in Kenya [17]. However, in a previous study from Tanzania, males were more exposed and infected than females during fishing [4].

Furthermore, the present study showed that the sanitation behaviour of fishermen was a significant predictor of infection, whereby fishermen who reported practicing open defecation either in bushes or in lakes had increased infection compared to those who did not report open defecation practice during fishing. The findings were consistent with previous results in Uganda [24] and Kenya [17]. The majority of fishermen reported defecating openly during fishing and evidence of faecal materials disposed in bushes along the lake were observed during data collection. The practice of open defecation in bushes might be responsible for the observed prevalence of infection among fishermen living in these areas. Therefore, decreasing community-wide open defecation practices can lower the prevalence of S. mansoni infection in the fishing community [25].

In this study, fishermen with a low level of KIS were at higher odds of being infected with S. mansoni than those with a high level of KIS. Therefore, provision of health education to this community can reduce the prevalence of infection [25]. Our findings are consistent with those reported in Nigeria [26]. However, in Cameroon, people with a high level of KIS were found to be at higher odds of being infected by S. mansoni than those without [27]. This might be due to the fact that health education provided to the people did not allow them to change their behaviour to prevent re-infection.

Limitations

The present study was subject to some limitations. Stool samples collected only on a single day to examine S. mansoni may have underestimated the prevalence of infection in the study population as parasite egg output fluctuates day to day. Therefore, future population studies may enhance this by collecting stool samples for at least two consecutive days. Consequently, about 12.5% of fishermen failed to provide stool samples hence the prevalence of infection may have been underestimated.

Furthermore, defecation behaviour during fishing was self-reported, which may have underestimated the actual proportion of individuals practicing open defecation in the study area.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the prevalence of S. mansoni infection among fishermen in the Busega district was high. The prevalence of infection varied with the age of the fishermen whereby young fishermen (aged ≤36 years) had the highest prevalence. Fishermen had a low level of KIS and practiced open defecation during fishing. Infection with S.mansoni was associated with a low level of KIS and open defecation behaviour during fishing.

The results of this study support the call for the inclusion of fishermen in the population targeted by the MDA program with praziquantel. This is important since infected fishermen may serve as potential reservoirs of S. mansoni infection and might be responsible for re-infection of treated school-aged children as well as transmission of S. mansoni to other community groups. Also, health education should be provided in the fishing community as a supplement to MDA programs to address misconceptions about the mode of transmission, symptoms, and prevention of intestinal schistosomiasis.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our honest appreciation to all fishermen of Busega who participated in this study, together with chairperson of Ihale, Nyamikoma A and B, Nchilu and Kalago Beach management units as well as Busega district council for allowing us to carry out this study.

The special thanks goes to laboratory technicians from the National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR) Mwanza Centre, Mr. Tupevilwe Mbilinyi, Elias John and Devis Lyatuu for technical support during laboratory examinations of stool samples and their support during data collection.

Abbreviations

BMU

Beach Management Unit

EPG

Eggs Per Gram

FEC

Formalin-Ether Concentration

GM

Geometric Mean

KIS

Knowledge about intestinal schistosomiasis

KK

Kato-Katz

MDA

Mass Drug Administration

MUHAS

Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences

NBS

National Bureau Of Statistics

NIMR

National Institute for Medical Research

SPSS

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

WHO

World Health Organization

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the article.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.WHO. Fact sheet on schistosomiasis [Internet]. 2019. www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/schistosomiasis.
  • 2.Farrar J, Hotez PJ, Junghanss T, Kang G, Lalloo D, White NJ. Manson ‘ s Tropical Diseases. 23rd ed. London, United Kingdom: Elsevier Saunders; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Colley DG, Bustinduy AL, Secor WE, King CH. Human schistosomiasis. Lancet [Internet]. 2014;383(9936):2253–64. Available from: http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/schisto. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61949-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mazigo HD, Nuwaha F, Kinung’Hi SM, Morona D, De Moira AP, Wilson S, et al. Epidemiology and control of human schistosomiasis in Tanzania. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5(1):274. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sacolo H, Chimbari M, Kalinda C. Knowledge, attitudes and practices on Schistosomiasis in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;46. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2923-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tchuenté LT, Rollinson D, Stothard JR, Molyneux D. Moving from control to elimination of schistosomiasis in sub-Saharan Africa: time to change and adapt strategies. Infect Dis Poverty. 2017;42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gouvras AN, Allan F, Kinung S, Rabone M, Emery A, Angelo T, et al. Longitudinal survey on the distribution of Biomphalaria sudanica and B. choanomophala in Mwanza region, on the shores of Lake Victoria, Tanzania: implications for schistosomiasis transmission and control. 2017;316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Menjetta T, Debalke S, Dana D. Schistosoma mansoni infection and risk factors among the fishermen of Lake Hawassa, southern Ethiopia. J Biosoc Sci. 2019;817–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.de Melo AGS, de Irmão JJ M, de LS Jeraldo V, Melo CM. Schistosomiasis mansoni in families of fishing workers of endemic area of Alagoas. Esc Anna Nery. 2018;23(1):1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Siza JE, Kaatano GM, Chai J, Eom KS, Rim H, Yong T, et al. Prevalence of Schistosomes and Soil-Transmitted Helminths among Schoolchildren in Lake Victoria Basin, Tanzania. Korean J Parasitol. 2015;53(5):515–24. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2015.53.5.515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.BDC. Fishing Activities | Simiyu Region [Internet]. Busega District council website. 2012 [cited 2020 Aug 17]. http://www.simiyu.go.tz/economic-activity/livestock-keeping.
  • 12.Sady H, Al-mekhlafi HM, Atroosh WM, Al-delaimy AK, Nasr NA, Dawaki S, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practices towards schistosomiasis among rural population in Yemen. Parasit Vectors [Internet]. 2015;436. Available from: doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1050-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.WHO. Bench aids for the diagnosis of intestinal parasites. 2nd ed. France: World Health Organization; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mazigo HD, Kepha S, Kaatano GM, Kinung SM. Co-infection of Schistosoma mansoni / hepatitis C virus and their associated factors among adult individuals living in fishing villages, north-western Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bruun B, Aagaard-Hansen J. The social context of schistosomiasis and its control: An introduction and annotated bibliography. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vereecken K, Fall A, Diop M, Ly A, Clercq D De, Vlas SJ De, et al. Human water contacts patterns in Schistosoma mansoni epidemic foci in northern Senegal change according to age, sex and place of residence, but are not related to intensity of infection. 2003;8(2):100–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gichuki PM, Kepha S, Mulewa D, Masaku J, Kwoba C, Mbugua G, et al. Association between Schistosoma mansoni infection and access to improved water and sanitation facilities in Mwea, Kirinyaga County, Kenya. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mazigo HD, Nuwaha F, Dunne DW, Kaatano GM, Angelo T, Kepha S, et al. Schistosoma mansoni Infection and Its Related Morbidity among Adults Living in Selected Villages of Mara Region, North-Western Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Exploratory Study. Korean J Parasitol. 2017;55(5):533–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stothard JR, Campbell SJ, Osei-atweneboana MY, Durant T, Stanton MC, Biritwum N, et al. Towards interruption of schistosomiasis transmission in sub-Saharan Africa: developing an appropriate environmental surveillance framework to guide and to support ‘ end game ‘ interventions. Infect Dis Poverty [Internet]. 2017;10. Available from: doi: 10.1186/s40249-016-0215-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Maseko TSB, Mkhonta NR, Masuku SKS, Dlamini S V, Fan C. Schistosomiasis knowledge, attitude, practices, and associated factors among primary school children in the Siphofaneni area in the Lowveld of Swaziland. J Microbiol Immunol Infect [Internet]. 2018;51(1):103–9. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2015.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Munisi DZ, Buza J, Mpolya EA, Angelo T, Kinung SM. Knowledge, attitude, and practices on intestinal schistosomiasis among primary schoolchildren in the Lake Victoria basin, Rorya District, north-western Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2017;731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Enk MJ, Carolina A, Lima L, Barros S, Massara CL, Marcos P, et al. Factors related to transmission of and infection with Schistosoma mansoni in a village in the South-eastern Region of Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2010;105(July):570–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gazzinelli A, Velasquez-Melendez G, Crawfordb SB, LoVerde PT, Rodrigo Correa-Oliveira HK. Socioeconomic Determinants of Schistosomiasis in a Poor Rural Area in Brazil. Running short title: Socioeconomic Determinants of Schistosomiasis in Brazil. Acta Trop [Internet]. 2006;99(2):260–71. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3624763/pdf/nihms412728.pdf. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Exum NG, Kibira SPS, Ssenyonga R, Nobili J, Shannon AK, Ssempebwa JC, et al. The prevalence of schistosomiasis in Uganda: A nationally representative population estimate to inform control programs and water and sanitation interventions. PLoS Negl Trop Dis [Internet]. 2019;13(8). Available from: doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hürlimann E, Silué KD, Zouzou F, Ouattara M, Schmidlin T, Yapi RB, et al. Effect of an integrated intervention package of preventive chemotherapy, community-led total sanitation and health education on the prevalence of helminth and intestinal protozoa infections in Côte d’Ivoire. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2642-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Abdulkareem BO, Habeeb KO, Kazeem A, Adam AO, Samuel UU. Urogenital Schistosomiasis among Schoolchildren and the Associated Risk Factors in Selected Rural Communities of Kwara State, Nigeria. Hindawi J Trop Med. 2018;6913918. doi: 10.1155/2018/6913918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sama MT, Oyono E, Ratard RC. High risk behaviours and schistosomiasis infection in Kumba, South-West Province, Cameroon. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2007;4(2):101–5. doi: 10.3390/ijerph2007040003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Wannaporn Ittiprasert

28 Jul 2022

PONE-D-22-14442Prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni infection among fishermen in Busega district, TanzaniaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Winfrida John,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript ‘Prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni infection among fishermen in Busega district, Tanzania’ to PLOS ONE. Your manuscript has been assessed by 2 reviewers. There are useful comments and suggestions to be improved the manuscript.  One of the reviewers have highligned several major concerns and questions in the sanitized file.   Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 11 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Wannaporn Ittiprasert, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service. 

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

3. Please amend either the abstract on the online submission form (via Edit Submission) or the abstract in the manuscript so that they are identical.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The paper seeks to address a topical issue of schistosomiasis among the fishermen in Tanzania. The paper determines the prevalence and risk factors for Schistosoma mansoni infection among fishermen in Tanzania. This is timely and very relevant as most studies focus on school-aged children. However, the authors need to address some issues highlighted in the reviewed manuscript before the paper can be considered for publication.

Reviewer #2: Comments to the Author

This manuscript reviews and assesses the current situation of people infected with Schistosoma mansoni in Busega district, Tanzania. Very interesting correlations between socioeconomic status, education, and infection levels were found in this study. Whereby the group of fishermen, a group which is at high risk of getting infected by schistosomes was investigated in more detail. The manuscript elaborated on the differences in sanitation access and management, highlighting the role of fishermen as reservoir hosts. This highlighted that treatment of only the group of pupils with praziquantel was not sufficient to control the current infection events. In order to record infection spreads more precisely, it would have been very interesting to also record the fishing-routes of selected infected and healthy fishermen. Furthermore, an additional figure containing a map showing the exact positions of sampled persons would be desirable to provide a better visual overview.

Especially the significant connection between the age and the status of infection was demonstrated in an impressive way. In addition, it was very delightful to get more information about the correlation of current infections and social status, like marital status, education level etc. However, the resolution to distinguish the different levels of educational level could be more detailed.

Weaknesses of the statistical analysis and sampling were critically discussed in the “Limitations” chapter. The discussed outlook, how the protocol can be adapted in future studies, showed a critical analysis of the own data.

The data presented, clearly underline the conclusions, which were made. Likewise, the conduct of the study, such as survey execution and evaluation, as well as the process of sample preparation were described in a technically clear and detailed manner. Subsequently, the statistics were described in an appropriate manner.

The presented data clearly show that education, social status and hygiene play an essential role in the occurrence of infections. This demonstrated that educational campaigns are essential in the fight against infectious diseases such as schistosomiasis. In addition, the manuscript was written in clear, scientific language.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-14442_reviewer.pdf

PLoS One. 2022 Nov 28;17(11):e0276395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276395.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


28 Aug 2022

Thank you for the comments and suggestions. The following are response to the comments given by the editor and also the reviewers.

-This manuscript is written according to the PLOS one’s style requirement.

-A thoroughly copyedited manuscript is done accordingly.

-The abstract has been amended as suggested.

-The global information on schistosomiasis is included as suggested.

-This age group (18 years and above) is not often targeted by MDA.

-Due to time constraints, data on the frequency of fishermen's contact with water were not collected.

-The stool samples were collected and processed the next day, so they were preserved for no more than 24 hours.

-The enter method was used in the data regression analysis.

-For a variety of reasons, including a lack of time for data collection, approximately 12.5% of fishermen did not provide stool samples. This -concern has been incorporated into the study's limitations.

-There were 201 infected individuals (65.04%). This information has been incorporated across the document.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Wannaporn Ittiprasert

6 Oct 2022

Prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni infection among fishermen in Busega district, Tanzania

PONE-D-22-14442R1

Dear Dr. Winfrida John,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Wannaporn Ittiprasert, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Thank you for revising the manuscript to address the reviewer's concerns. This study contributes to our understanding in the Schistosoma mansoni infection among fishermen in the epidemic area, and should be informative to the field.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: This manuscript reviews and assesses the current situation of people infected with Schistosoma mansoni in Busega district, Tanzania. Whereby the group of fishermen, a group which is at high risk of getting infected by schistosomes was investigated in more detail.

In general, the points previously noted have been clarified and revised in this manuscript.

In order to record infection spreads more precisely, it would have been very interesting to also record the fishing-routes of selected infected and healthy fishermen. Furthermore, an additional figure containing a map showing the exact positions of sampled persons would be desirable to provide a better visual overview. Visualizing these data, as well as locating the various anchorages of fishers, could improve the data with further clues in terms of the epidemiology. These data would be of great interest to include in a follow-up publication.

With the additions, the Conclusion was made more comprehensible. In addition, the importance and lack of knowledge of the 18+ age group was explored in more detail and depth.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Wannaporn Ittiprasert

26 Oct 2022

PONE-D-22-14442R1

Prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni infection among fishermen in Busega district, Tanzania

Dear Dr. John:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Wannaporn Ittiprasert

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-14442_reviewer.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the article.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES