Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2022 Nov 14;119(47):e2214662119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2214662119

Super-resolution re-scan second harmonic generation microscopy

Stefan G Stanciu a,1,2, Radu Hristu a,1, George A Stanciu a, Denis E Tranca a, Lucian Eftimie b, Adrian Dumitru c,d, Mariana Costache c,d, Harald A Stenmark e, Harm Manders f, Amit Cherian f, Mariliis Tark-Dame f, Erik M M Manders f
PMCID: PMC9704717  PMID: 36375085

Abstract

Second harmonic generation microscopy (SHG) is generally acknowledged as a powerful tool for the label-free three-dimensional visualization of tissues and advanced materials, with one of its most popular applications being collagen imaging. Despite the great need, progress in super-resolved SHG imaging lags behind the developments reported over the past years in fluorescence-based optical nanoscopy. In this work, we demonstrate super-resolved re-scan SHG, qualitatively and quantitatively showing on collagenous tissues the available resolution advantage over the diffraction limit. We introduce as well super-resolved re-scan two-photon excited fluorescence microscopy, an imaging modality not explored to date.

Keywords: second harmonic generation, two-photon excited fluorescence, super-resolved optical imaging


Second harmonic generation microscopy(SHG) exploits the interaction of two incident near-infrared photons with a noncentrosymmetric molecule, resulting in a single emitted photon with double the energy via a nonlinear process involving virtual states. Considering its high imaging potential based on intrinsic contrast, augmented by other advantages such as no bleaching, no blinking, or high signal-to-noise ratio compared to fluorescence, SHG has gained important interest in the context of label-free characterization of fixed, ex vivo and in vivo tissues (13) and advanced materials (4, 5). With respect to the former, selective SHG contrast from collagen holds valuable potential for disease diagnostics, given that during the progression of many severe pathologies, including cancers, the collagen network of affected organs is modified in specific ways (6). Applications based on SHG contrast from exogenous harmonophores are also noteworthy to mention (7). In materials science, among others, SHG has been demonstrated useful for characterizing defects in semiconductors (8), carrier motion in organic transistors (9), grain boundaries for two-dimensional materials (4), or for the overall better understanding of emerging materials (5).

Among the first notable attempts to achieve super-resolved images based on SHG, Masihzadeh et al. (10) and Liu et al. (11) succeeded in reducing the size of the point-spread function by manipulating the polarization state of the incident light. A drawback of such approaches is their high sensitivity to effects such as circular dichroism or birefringence, which interfere with the polarization state of the excitation beam. Later, Field et al. (12) introduced multiphoton spatial frequency-modulated imaging, a technique with no specific polarization requirements, providing a 2× resolution improvement over conventional SHG and two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF); the complex experimental setup might raise difficulties for non-expert users. Further on, Gregor et al. (13) achieved super-resolved SHG and TPEF images using image scanning microscopy (ISM). Under illumination with a 900-nm laser beam, distances of 550 nm with a contrast of 100% were successfully resolved for rat tail collagen fibrils. ISM uses a mathematic algorithm on many small pinhole images (sometimes over 106) to reconstruct the improved resolution image, which has important implications with respect to the total acquisition time.

Herein we introduce re-scan second harmonic generation microscopy (rSHG), a method for super-resolved SHG imaging, which contributes to overcoming the aforementioned limitations. We demonstrate as well re-scan two-photon excited fluorescence (rTPEF), with TPEF generally regarded as a complementary non-linear optical microscopy (NLO) technique to SHG (3). Both rSHG and rTPEF rely on the re-scan concept which lies at the core of re-scan confocal microscopy (RCM) (14). Since its recent advent, RCM has gained massive interest and a large user base given its resolution advantages which are available under the premises of a simple and highly flexible technical architecture and affordable costs.

Results

For demonstrating the resolution advantage of rSHG we have used both a rat tail tissue fragment (fixed, unlabeled), a highly collagenous tissue that is emerging as a model for benchmarking SHG imaging methods, and also human breast tissue. In Figs. 1 and 2 we provide qualitative evidence on the resolution advantage of rSHG over conventional, diffraction-limited, SHG imaging. In Fig. 1, the colored masks indicate rat tail tissue areas where the collagen fibers and the overall aspect of the collagen network are significantly better resolved with rSHG. In Fig. 2 we present rSHG images collected on a hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained normal breast tissue fragment, prepared according to typical procedures for clinical histopathological examination. As discussed in past work, H&E staining does not significantly influence SHG signals (15). rSHG allows assessing the conformation and disposition of the collagen in the connective stroma neighboring a healthy mammary terminal ductal–lobular unit with considerable better clarity than SHG.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Resolution advantage of rSHG vs. SHG on rat tail collagenous tissues (formalin-fixed, unstained) at different levels of detail. Colored masks indicate sample areas where rSHG’s resolving power is well visible. Images collected with a scientific grade Hamamatsu ORCA-Flash 4.0 v3 s-CMOS camera. (Scale bars: 3 µm.)

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

SHG and rSHG images of a tissue fragment (formalin-fixed, H&E-stained) from a negative resection margin adjacent to a breast carcinoma acquired with (A) a Hamamatsu ORCA-Flash 4.0 v3 scientific-grade sCMOS camera and (B) a FLIR Chameleon3 conventional CMOS camera. (Scale bars: 5 μm.)

In Fig. 3 we provide quantitative proof of the resolution enhancement provided by rSHG, and by rTPEF, with TPEF imaging being generally acknowledged as highly complementary to SHG (2, 3). All calculations discussed in this figure were performed on non-processed, non-averaged rSHG and rTPEF images. In Fig. 3A we present a rat tail tissue collagenous sample area where profile lines were drawn over well-separated collagen fibrils. In Fig. 3B we present a close-up view of a single collagen fibril, highlighting a region where the SHG and rSHG profile lines were drawn to quantitatively assess the resolution enhancement. The average full width at half maximum (FWHM) ratio for 10 profile lines randomly drawn over the highlighted area was 1.40 ± 0.2, with the average FWHM calculated for the rSHG and SHG images being 160 ± 16 nm and 220 ± 30 nm, respectively (results presented as mean ± SD). Similar values were identified for >70 considered profile lines drawn over single collagen fibrils in other acquired SHG and rSHG image pairs. rSHG and SHG images were collected with the same system (SI Appendix), with switching between the two work modes being done by modifying the angular amplitude of the scanner and re-scanner mirrors (SI Appendix). Noteworthy, the experimental FWHM value for the SHG image aligns to the theoretical value, which for 860-nm illumination and a 1.42 numerical aperture is 210 nm, according to Eq. 1:

FWHM=0.5λ2NA. [1]

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Resolution improvement in rSHG and rTPEF. (A) rSHG and SHG images collected on rat tail tendon collagen fibrils. (B) Examples of profile line pairs transversally drawn across the collagen fibril in the highlighted area. (C) rTPEF and TPEF images collected on an Argo-SIM calibration sample. (D) Examples of profile line pairs transversally drawn across the visible structures. Profile lines: green: rSHG/rTPEF, blue: SHG/TPEF.

With the same setup we also explored rTPEF (Fig. 3C), which was performed on a fluorescent Argo-SIM (Argolight, France) calibration slide. For >50 profile lines pairs randomly considered in the displayed TPEF and rTPEF images, the average FWHM ratio was 1.51 ± 0.05, with the average FWHM calculated for the rTPEF and TPEF images being 241 ± 5 nm and 360 ± 10 nm, respectively. Examples of TPEF & rTPEF profile lines are provided in Fig. 3D.

Discussion

The greater level of detail offered by rSHG over conventional SHG can obviously favor the more accurate extraction of quantitative information reflecting the morphology and other properties of the collagen fibrils (16, 17), which play an important role in computer-aided diagnostics scenarios. Furthermore, for methods aimed at differentiating pathological vs. healthy tissues based on pixel-by-pixel fitting of polarization-resolved SHG images of collagen fibrils (18), a higher optical resolution enables access to additional information which can augment the diagnostic procedure.

In terms of relevant applications, given that an RCM unit adapted for rSHG can be easily coupled to optical microscopes already available in clinical settings, we argue that histopathology laboratories can benefit from this reported methodology, as it can enable modern workflows based on NLO techniques to complement traditional assays. Such correlative approaches can be implemented on samples prepared using traditional histopathology protocols, as usual dyes (e.g., H&E) do not significantly affect the SHG signals. On the other hand, such stains have been shown to augment tissue imaging (19) with third harmonic generation microscopy (THG), which can potentially be implemented with the same re-scan architecture, depending on the availability of appropriate illumination sources. Furthermore, considering that super-resolved imaging of collagen, lipids, and various endogenous chromophores can also be performed on unstained tissues with rSHG, re-scan THG, and rTPEF, respectively, we argue that these techniques can be of important help to identify subtle modifications that precede, or develop, during cancers on freshly excised tissues, next to the patient. This can promote improved diagnostics and faster decision-making.

Overall, given the simplicity and flexibility of re-scan microscopy, we consider that the reported architecture and results are likely to augment the number and nature of applications relying on super-resolved non-linear optical imaging.

Methods

rSHG and rTPEF were performed with a multimodal prototype based on a conventional RCM setup of first generation that was custom-modified. The architecture and configuration of this system, together with aspects on data acquisition and sample preparation, are presented in SI Appendix. The tissue fragments of human origin discussed in this work were previously collected for routine histological examination from a patient and were deidentified prior to use in the current study.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File
pnas.2214662119.sapp.pdf (194.3KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Horizon 2020 Attract: HARMOPLUS (777222-1052), Unitatea Executiva Pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior a Cercetarii Dezvoltarii si Inovarii (UEFISCDI) RO-NO-2019-0601, and UEFISCDI PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2019-1666. S.G.S. expresses sincere thanks to Dr. Arnaud Royon at Argolight for providing the Argo-SIM calibration slide.

Footnotes

Competing interest statement: E.M.M.M. has relevant ownership of stock in Confocal.nl. B.V. Confocal.nl is owner of the following patents relevant for re-scan microscopy: NL2026002B1, NL2023384B1, NL2020516B1, NL2018134B1.

This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2214662119/-/DCSupplemental.

Data, Materials, and Software Availability

Images used for quantitatively assessing the resolution advantage in rSHG/rTPEF, Fig. 3, have been deposited in Open Science Framework (OSF) (https://osf.io/2wgt5/) (20).

References

  • 1.Campagnola P. J., Dong C. Y., Second harmonic generation microscopy: Principles and applications to disease diagnosis. Laser Photonics Rev. 5, 13–26 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dilipkumar A., et al. , Label-free multiphoton endomicroscopy for minimally invasive in vivo imaging. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.) 6, 1801735 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zipfel W. R., et al. , Live tissue intrinsic emission microscopy using multiphoton-excited native fluorescence and second harmonic generation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 7075–7080 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Karvonen L., et al. , Rapid visualization of grain boundaries in monolayer MoS2 by multiphoton microscopy. Nat. Commun. 8, 15714 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gleeson M., et al. , Quantitative polarization-resolved second-harmonic-generation microscopy of glycine microneedles. Adv. Mater. 32, e2002873 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bonnans C., Chou J., Werb Z., Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 786–801 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pantazis P., Maloney J., Wu D., Fraser S. E., Second harmonic generating (SHG) nanoprobes for in vivo imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 14535–14540 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hristu R., Stanciu S. G., Tranca D. E., Matei A., Stanciu G. A., Nonlinear optical imaging of defects in cubic silicon carbide epilayers. Sci. Rep. 4, 5258 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Manaka T., Lim E., Tamura R., Iwamoto M., Direct imaging of carrier motion in organic transistors by optical second-harmonic generation. Nat. Photonics 1, 581–584 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Masihzadeh O., Schlup P., Bartels R. A., Enhanced spatial resolution in third-harmonic microscopy through polarization switching. Opt. Lett. 34, 1240–1242 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu J., Cho I.-H., Cui Y., Irudayaraj J., Second harmonic super-resolution microscopy for quantification of mRNA at single copy sensitivity. ACS Nano 8, 12418–12427 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Field J. J., et al. , Superresolved multiphoton microscopy with spatial frequency-modulated imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 6605–6610 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gregor I., et al. , Rapid nonlinear image scanning microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 1087–1089 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.De Luca G. M., et al. , Re-scan confocal microscopy: Scanning twice for better resolution. Biomed. Opt. Express 4, 2644–2656 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hristu R., et al. , Influence of hematoxylin and eosin staining on the quantitative analysis of second harmonic generation imaging of fixed tissue sections. Biomed. Opt. Express 12, 5829–5843 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mostaço-Guidolin L. B., et al. , Collagen morphology and texture analysis: From statistics to classification. Sci. Rep. 3, 2190 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Boudaoud A., et al. , FibrilTool, an ImageJ plug-in to quantify fibrillar structures in raw microscopy images. Nat. Protoc. 9, 457–463 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cisek R., Joseph A., Harvey M., Tokarz D., Polarization-sensitive second harmonic generation microscopy for investigations of diseased collagenous tissues. Front. Phys. 9, 10.3389/fphy.2021.726996 (2021). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tuer A., et al. , Nonlinear multicontrast microscopy of hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained histological sections. J. Biomed. Opt. 15, 026018 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.R. Hristu, S. G. Stanciu, rSHG. OSF. https://osf.io/2wgt5/. Deposited 17 October 2022.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File
pnas.2214662119.sapp.pdf (194.3KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Images used for quantitatively assessing the resolution advantage in rSHG/rTPEF, Fig. 3, have been deposited in Open Science Framework (OSF) (https://osf.io/2wgt5/) (20).


Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES