Abstract
We describe a unique case of 43-year-old male who presented with a persistent lateral knee pain caused by impingement between a femoral surgical screw and the iliotibial band, which was treated with surgical resection of the screw debris. The patient had reincidence of the symptoms and a magnetic resonance showed a wide and unrepairable tear of the iliotibial band, which was treated with interposition of a folded fasciae latae allograf. After the procedure, the patient had excellent clinical results and imaging evaluation showed progressive allograft integration. This case highlights the imaging findings and surgical aspects of an iliotibial band reconstruction, a novel surgical procedure that could be considered in patients with an unrepairable iliotibial band injury.
Keywords: Knee, Iliotibial band, Surgery, Allograft, Reconstruction, Magnetic resonance
Abbreviations: ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; ITB, iliotibial band; MR, magnetic resonance
Background
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries affect more than 200,000 people in the United States every year [1] and ACL reconstruction is among the most performed orthopedic procedures worldwide, being on the rise in both adults and adolescents [2], [3], [4]. Despite the excellent results of arthroscopic ACL reconstructions, complications do occur and include infection, arthrofibrosis and graft related complications as device fracture, impingement, and failure [5,6].
There is a wide range of graft fixation devices, including metallic and bio-absorbable materials. When mispositioned, the devices may damage the hyaline cartilage or adjacent fascia and tendons [6]. Tibial cysts related to the tibial screw are more commonly reported in literature than femoral ones. However, femoral cysts might also occur when the femoral fixation is performed with an interference screw from outside in and those cysts may damage adjacent soft tissue structures [7].
The iliotibial band (ITB) corresponds to the distal fascial continuation of the tensor fasciae latae muscle and contributes to the anterolateral stability of the knee, functioning as a knee extensor or flexor depending on the degree of knee flexion [8], [9], [10]. There are a significant number of cases on literature reporting mechanical complications of the ITB following ACL and other ligament reconstructions, particularly caused by femoral fixation devices [11], [12], [13]. Lateral impingement with ITB friction may be more frequently seen when the femoral tunnel exit is positioned near the lateral femoral epicondyle. Prominent screws or its debris may cause symptomatic ITB impingement and induce cystic formation and bursitis, that may lead to chronic wear and tendon degeneration.
Although there are numerous surgical uses for ITB as autograft or allograft reported in literature, there are few studies approaching its surgical repair [14], all of them based on primary repair and suture [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. We report the surgical and imaging aspects of a unique case of an ITB reconstruction using an allograft fascia tissue in a patient who had an ITB discontinuity due to complications related to a femoral screw after an ACL reconstruction. To our knowledge this is the first case report that addresses an allograft reconstruction of the ITB.
Case presentation
A 43-year-old male presented with a persistent lateral right knee pain for 4 months. He had a past history of right ACL reconstruction 18 months before. The patient denied any trauma or significant physical activity. Physical examination demonstrated a small lateral mass adjacent to the ACL femoral fixation scar, with no signs of infection.
A magnetic resonance (MR) was performed and demonstrated bursal liquid distension and a cystic image along the lateral femoral condyle, next to the femoral screw path associated with small foci of screw debris (Fig. 1). There was mild thickening and signal changes in the adjacent ITB.
Fig. 1.
Knee MR (A, coronal T1-weighted; B, coronal; and C, axial T2-weighted fat-saturated) demonstrates screw path in the lateral femoral condyle, with small debris (long arrows) and adjacent cystic formation/bursitis (arrowheads) involving the ITB, that is mildly thickened, without discontinuities.
The patient was elected for surgical management aiming to remove the screw debris and the lateral cystic formation. The procedure was made using a lateral incision, dissection and opening of the iliotibial tract, allowing identification and resection of the cyst along with the numerous screw debris. Curettage of the femoral tunnel was also performed and primary suture of ITB was done. After surgery patient was allowed to bear weight as tolerated and range of motion was not restricted since the first post-operative day.
Two months later, the patient presented with right knee lateral pain and swelling. No related trauma was reported. Ultrasound and MR images were requested and showed a wide discontinuity of the distal segment of the ITB with an interposed heterogeneous fluid collection that extended to the subcutaneous and deep planes (Fig. 2). At that time, as there was no trauma that could lead to the lesion, the hypothesis of non-healing of the ITB was done.
Fig. 2.
Knee MR (A, coronal T1-weighted; B, coronal; and C, axial T2-weighted fat-saturated images) and sonography (D, long axis) demonstrates wide area of discontinuity of the distal segment of the ITB, with thickened, degenerated and irregular margins (arrows in C), associated to a heterogeneous fluid collection that extends through tendinous gap to the subcutaneous.
Due to persistent pain, the large volume of lateral fluid accumulation and the non-probability of spontaneous healing of the ITB, patient was referred to surgery again and during the procedure a longitudinal injury of the ITB was identified with very degenerated and friable edges, devitalized tissue and fluid accumulation below it. Cystic resection, bursectomy, and synovectomy were performed. Debridement of devitalized edges of the ITB was performed. Initially, primary repair of the ITB was attempted, but couldn't be completed due to a degenerated and friable tissue. To cover the ITB failure, a folded fasciae latae allograf tissue was used (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Intraoperative images are provided. (A) A longitudinal extension injury of the ITB was identified with very degenerated edges (B) Fasciae latae allograf tissue was used for defect coverage placement of double fascia with high resistance fixation points. After fixation, good fixation of the fasciae latae and complete coverage of the ITB defect were observed.
Patient was advised to use a knee brace for 6 weeks in order to avoid flexion-extension movements that could lead to overload of the ITB repair. The patient tolerated the procedure well without any complications and reported resolution of knee pain at his postoperative follow-up. MR control after 3 months showed the ITB repair with a graft interposition and complete closure of the previously characterized discontinuity area (Fig. 4A and B).
Fig. 4.
Images show consecutive post-operative knee MR images. (A, D) Coronal and axial T2 FS images 3 months after surgery; (B, E) Coronal and axial T2 FS images 6 months after surgery and (C, F) Coronal and axial T2 FS images 18 months after surgery. In the first control images (A, D), the allograft appears as a thin structure with heterogeneous high signal intensity and no clear signs of allograft incorporation (arrowheads in A, D), with adjacent liquid distension (arrows). Subsequent post-operative images at 6 months (B, E) and 18 months (C, F) show resolution of the liquid distension and progressive allograft incorporation and regularization, with a homogeneous low signal of the fibers in the last control images (arrowheads in C, F).
Subsequent postoperative MR controls were requested at 6 and 18 months (Fig. 4C-F), showing progressive graft integration and a complete closure of the tendon defect, presenting a homogeneous low signal tissue, as well as regularization of the degenerated tendon margins and resolution of the fluid accumulation. Timeline of the events (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.
Timeline of the events. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament.
Discussion and conclusion
This case showed a unique case of a ITB reconstruction using a fasciae latae tendon allograft, focusing on the surgical aspects and on the imaging findings that provided evidence of progressive allograft incorporation. To our knowledge, this is the first case report that addresses an allograft reconstruction of the ITB.
Graft fixation in ACL reconstruction must be strong enough to allow an aggressive postoperative rehabilitation, early return to function, and optimize the patient's recovery. Anchoring the reconstructed graft to the bone may be achieved by different devices such as screws, buttons, cross pins and screw posts or a combination of these on the femoral side [20]. Bioabsorbable and metallic screws are both frequently used for femoral or tibial fixation in ALC reconstructions and a recent meta-analysis showed that although there is no difference between them in terms of subjective knee function or knee laxity, bioabsorbable screws may show more complications [21].
Bioabsorbable materials are prone to complications as device fracture and fragmentation years following placement. A fractured or fragmented bioabsorbable screw can result in synovitis, effusion, cyst and granuloma formation, which can cause injuries to adjacent soft tissues. Several cases reports have been published on literature describing fragments of bioabsorbable screws that had migrated to intra-articular space causing damage to hyaline cartilage in late follow up controls [6,22].
ITB injury following ACL and other ligament reconstructions has been described in the literature, being mainly caused by femoral graft devices [11,12,23]. Helito et al. described 6 cases of ITB friction caused by loosening of the femoral fixation material following posterolateral corner reconstructions, demanding additional corrective surgical procedures [12]. Pelfort also reported 2 cases of ITB injury after ACL repair, caused by incorrect positioning and rupture of the femoral cross-pin fixation [11]. We described a case in which femoral screws debris caused impingement with cystic degeneration and bursitis adjacent to the ITB. The access route for the screw removal demanded an incision in the ITB, which then showed to be too degenerated to allow the usual primary repair. We hypothesize that the ITB screw debris and cystic degeneration contributed to the ITB wasting and degeneration, avoiding appropriate healing.
Macroscopic signs of ITB wear may be seen as a friable, thinned and irregular tissue, that in histological examination usually exhibits an intense chronic inflammatory cells infiltration, with hyperplastic synovial lining [17]. ITB injuries are usually a result of a knee friction syndrome and are treated conservatively with rest and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to reduce inflammation and potentially allow the bursa to heal [24].
Surgical treatment for ITB syndrome is rarely needed and is reserved for cases of unsuccessful conservative treatment, with persistent pain. Many different surgical techniques have been described [[16], [17], [18], [19],25,26]. Z-plasty lengthening of the ITB was first described by Richards et al. [19] and also used Barber et al. [26] with good results, consisting in a lengthening of the ITB through transverse and longitudinal incisions, followed by a ITB suture. Drogset reported excellent satisfaction levels and function gain after performing transection of the posterior half of the ITB at the level of the lateral epicondyle, with or without an associated bursectomy [18]. Similarly, Noble reported good results of a posterior release of ITB fibers at the level of the lateral femoral epicondyle [16]. Sangkaew described a technique based on tension-release of the ITB through multiple incisions made across the tendon fibers, with punctured wounds (mesh appearance) [25].
In our case, the ITB was transfixed in its distal segment and the fibers’ wear and degeneration did not enable a primary suture. A fasciae latae allograf tissue was used to cover the ITB defect. Tendon allografts have an important role in tendon reconstruction in a number of anatomical sites, being able to overcome the obstacles of poor tissue quality and availability of autologous tissue besides avoiding the donor site morbidity associated with autologous grafts [27,28]. They have become increasingly popular for a variety of tendon repairs, especially when there is a deficient, scarred, and retracted tendon, preventing a primary repair [29], [30], [31]. Besides, allografts provide a sufficiently long tendon length that allows various methods of fixation and suture [32].
The biology of tendon grafts incorporation, whether autogenous or allogenic, is based in a similar process that includes 3 main phases: an inflammatory stage, a reparative stage with collagen production and, finally, a remodeling or maturation stage. The graft undergoes necrosis, revascularization, cell repopulation and remodeling [33,34]. MR imaging evaluation of the tendon graft reflects the phases of graft integration and provides important information regarding general morphology, tendon structure, integration and grade of vascularity. Based on papers regarding Achilles tendon integration following graft repair, it is known that there is initially thinning and a high signal intensity area on fluid sensitive sequences along the tendon graft, representing active scar tissue, that seems to correlate with the healing response, usually decreasing after 6 months. After that, the tendon graft slowly demonstrates integration signs with a homogeneous low signal intensity on proton-density (PD) and T2-weighted image [35]. Gadolinium-based contrast agent injection initially shows intratendineous signal enhancement, corresponding to revascularization and healing progress that persists until avascular scar formation occur, usually decreasing over time and not being encountered after the 2-year MR follow-up [30,32,[36], [37], [38]].
We reported an ITB reconstruction using a fasciae latae tendon allograft following ITB chronic wear caused by screw debris of a previous ALC reconstruction. Post-surgery MR showed complete allograft integration and patient reported completed improvement of clinical complaints. We suggest this technic should be considered in the specific group of patients who present ITB injury with an excessive degenerated tissue condition that forbids a primary tendon suture. The imaging aspects of the allograft integration are shown and liquid reabsorption and a progressive homogeneous low signal along the tendon graft is expected.
Patient consent
A signed consent for the report publication was acquired from the patient.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have no conflict of interest to disclosure.
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.radcr.2022.11.003.
Appendix. Supplementary materials
References
- 1.Kaeding CC, Léger-St-Jean B, Magnussen RA. Epidemiology and diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Clin Sports Med. 2017;36(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2016.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ, Larson DR, Dahm DL, Levy BA, et al. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: a 21-year population-based study. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(6):1502–1507. doi: 10.1177/0363546516629944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Weitz FK, Sillanpää PJ, Mattila VM. The incidence of paediatric ACL injury is increasing in Finland. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(2):363–368. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05553-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zbrojkiewicz D, Vertullo C, Grayson JE. Increasing rates of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young Australians, 2000-2015. Med J Aust. 2018;208(8):354–358. doi: 10.5694/mja17.00974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Papakonstantinou O, Chung CB, Chanchairujira K, Resnick DL. Complications of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(5):1106–1117. doi: 10.1007/s00330-002-1622-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sharp JW, Kani KK, Gee A, Mulcahy H, Chew FS, Porrino J. Anterior cruciate ligament fixation devices: Expected imaging appearance and common complications. Eur J Radiol. 2018;99:17–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Barbosa NC, Campos JP, Capelão V, Kandhari V, Vieira TD, Sonnery-Cottet B. A comprehensive scoping review of tibial cysts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Exp Orthop. 2021;8(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00356-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Falvey EC, Clark RA, Franklyn-Miller A, Bryant AL, Briggs C, McCrory PR. Iliotibial band syndrome: an examination of the evidence behind a number of treatment options. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(4):580–587. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00968.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mansour R, Yoong P, McKean D, Teh JL. The iliotibial band in acute knee trauma: patterns of injury on MR imaging. Skelet Radiol. 2014;43(10):1369–1375. doi: 10.1007/s00256-014-1918-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vieira EL, Vieira EA, da Silva RT, Berlfein PA, Abdalla RJ, Cohen M. An anatomic study of the iliotibial tract. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(3):269–274. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pelfort X, Monllau JC, Puig L, Cáceres E. Iliotibial band friction syndrome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the transfix device: report of two cases and review of the literature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(6):586–589. doi: 10.1007/s00167-005-0006-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Helito CP, Bonadio MB, Demange MK, Albuquerque RF, Pécora JR, Camanho GL, et al. Screw loosening and iliotibial band friction after posterolateral corner reconstruction. Knee. 2014;21(3):769–773. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Taketomi S, Inui H, Hirota J, Nakamura K, Sanada T, Masuda H, et al. Iliotibial band irritation caused by the EndoButton after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: report of two cases. Knee. 2013;20(4):291–294. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dean CS, Fernandes O, Cinque ME, Chahla J, LaPrade RF. Paraskiing crash and knee dislocation with multiligament reconstruction and iliotibial band repair. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2017;46(5):E301–E3E7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pandit SR, Solomon DJ, Gross DJ, Golijanin P, Provencher MT. Isolated iliotibial band rupture after corticosteroid injection as a cause of subjective instability and knee pain in a military special warfare trainee. Mil Med. 2014;179(4):e469–e472. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Noble CA. The treatment of iliotibial band friction syndrome. Br J Sports Med. 1979;13(2):51–54. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.13.2.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Martens M, Libbrecht P, Burssens A. Surgical treatment of the iliotibial band friction syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 1989;17(5):651–654. doi: 10.1177/036354658901700511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Drogset JO, Rossvoll I, Grøntvedt T. Surgical treatment of iliotibial band friction syndrome. A retrospective study of 45 patients. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1999;9(5):296–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.1999.tb00249.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Richards DP, Alan Barber F, Troop RL. Iliotibial band Z-lengthening. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(3):326–329. doi: 10.1053/jars.2003.50081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hapa O, Barber FA. ACL fixation devices. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2009;17(4):217–223. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181bf668c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xu B, Yin Y, Zhu Y, Fu W. Comparison of bioabsorbable and metallic interference screws for graft fixation during ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(8):1–11. doi: 10.1177/23259671211021577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Konan S, Haddad FS. A clinical review of bioabsorbable interference screws and their adverse effects in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Knee. 2009;16(1):6–13. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Argintar E, Scherer B, Jordan T, Klimkiewicz J. Transverse femoral implant prominence: four cases demonstrating a preventable complication for ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2010;33(12):923. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20101021-29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Flato R, Passanante GJ, Skalski MR, Patel DB, White EA, Matcuk GR. The iliotibial tract: imaging, anatomy, injuries, and other pathology. Skelet Radiol. 2017;46(5):605–622. doi: 10.1007/s00256-017-2604-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sangkaew C. Surgical treatment of iliotibial band friction syndrome with the mesh technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127(4):303–306. doi: 10.1007/s00402-006-0152-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Barber FA, Boothby MH, Troop RL. Z-plasty lengthening for iliotibial band friction syndrome. J Knee Surg. 2007;20(4):281–284. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen J, Xu J, Wang A, Zheng M. Scaffolds for tendon and ligament repair: review of the efficacy of commercial products. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2009;6(1):61–73. doi: 10.1586/17434440.6.1.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Robertson A, Nutton RW, Keating JF. Current trends in the use of tendon allografts in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(8):988–992. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B8.17555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Carlson Strother CR, LaPrade MD, Keyt LK, Wilbur RR, Krych AJ, Stuart MJ. A strategy for repair, augmentation, and reconstruction of knee extensor mechanism disruption: a retrospective review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(10) doi: 10.1177/23259671211046625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Deese JM, Gratto-Cox G, Clements FD, Brown K. Achilles allograft reconstruction for chronic Achilles tendinopathy. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2015;24(1):75–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rust DA, Giveans MR, Stone RM, Samuelson KM, Larson CM. Functional outcomes and return to sports after acute repair, chronic repair, and allograft reconstruction for proximal hamstring ruptures. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(6):1377–1383. doi: 10.1177/0363546514528788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Park YS, Sung KS. Surgical reconstruction of chronic achilles tendon ruptures using various methods. Orthopedics. 2012;35(2):e213–e218. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120123-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jackson DW, Corsetti J, Simon TM. Biologic incorporation of allograft anterior cruciate ligament replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;(324):126–133. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199603000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Arnoczky SP. The biology of allograft incorporation. J Knee Surg. 2006;19(3):207–214. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Barile A, Bruno F, Mariani S, Arrigoni F, Brunese L, Zappia M, et al. Follow-up of surgical and minimally invasive treatment of Achilles tendon pathology: a brief diagnostic imaging review. Musculoskelet Surg. 2017;101(suppl 1):51–61. doi: 10.1007/s12306-017-0456-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chianca V, Zappia M, Oliva F, Luca B, Maffulli N. Post-operative MRI and US appearance of the Achilles tendons. J Ultrasound. 2020;23(3):387–395. doi: 10.1007/s40477-020-00479-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hollawell S, Baione W. Chronic Achilles tendon rupture reconstructed with achilles tendon allograft and xenograft combination. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54(6):1146–1150. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shoaib A, Mishra V. Surgical repair of symptomatic chronic achilles tendon rupture using synthetic graft augmentation. Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;23(3):179–182. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





