Abstract
A risk analysis of Shiga toxin (Stx)-encoding bacteriophage was carried out by confirming the transduction phage to non-Stx-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and subsequent expression of the Shiga toxin genes. The virulence factor stx1 was identified in five phages, and both stx1 and stx2 were found in four phages from a total of 19 phage isolates with seven non-O157 STEC strains. The four phages, designated as φNOEC41, φNOEC46, φNOEC47, and φNOEC49, belonged morphologically to the Myoviridae family. The stabilities of these phages to temperature, pH, ethanol, and NaClO were high with some variabilities among the phages. The infection of five non-STEC strains by nine Stx-encoding phages occurred at a rate of approximately 40%. Non-STEC strains were transduced by Stx-encoding phage to become lysogenic strains, and seven convertant strains had stx1 and/or stx2 genes. Only the stx1 gene was transferred to the receptor strains without any deletion. Gene expression of a convertant having both stx1 and stx2 genes was confirmed to be up to 32 times higher for Stx1 in 6% NaCl osmotic media and twice for Stx2 in 4% NaCl media, compared with expression in low-salt environments. Therefore, a new risk might arise from the transfer of pathogenic genes from Stx-encoding phages to otherwise harmless hosts. Without adequate sterilization of food exposed to various environments, there is a possibility that the toxicity of the phages might increase.
Keywords: Bacteriophage, Shiga toxin, transduction, non-pathogenic E. coli, convertant
Introduction
Shiga toxins (Stx) are a group of bacterial toxins those cause human and animal diseases. Stx is produced primarily by Escherichia coli and Shigella dysenteriae, and sporadically by Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, and S. flexneri [1]. Stx has two major types: Shiga toxin1 (Stx1) and Shiga toxin2 (Stx2). Stx1 and Stx2 have very similar biochemical properties and mechanisms, however, their immunological characteristics are different. Clinically, Stx2 is approximately 1000 times more toxic than Stx1 [2, 3].
There are approximately 200 serotypes of Stx-producing E. coli (STEC). Typical examples are E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 STEC serotypes, including O26, O103, O111, O118, O145, and O156. Strains O103 and O111 account for approximately 50% of total non-O157 STECs [4]. STEC pathogenesis is caused by various virulence factors encoded in the genome, plasmids, and bacteriophages [5, 6]. STEC causes hemorrhagic colitis (HC) by adhering to the intestinal mucosa and producing Stx. Severe diseases such as hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) can be induced in children and the elderly, and have been reported worldwide [7, 8].
Bacteriophages (phages) containing the stx gene play a major role in mediating pathogenicity, by transferring pathogenetic genes to generic E. coli. Phages have been found in soil, sewage, rivers, and feces. Pathogenic genes may be acquired from other phages [1, 9]. Stx is encoded in the late gene region of the lysogenic phage, which is expressed only when the phage in the host cell is induced by replication or the lytic cycle [10, 11]. STEC can be exposed to various environmental stresses, such as heat, antibiotics, and UV. Phages are induced and pathogenic gene transfer to other bacteria may be possible in such environments [12, 13]. It has been reported that hydrogen peroxide treatment also induces the induction of Stx-encoding phage. This observation suggests that the hydrogen peroxide in fermented foods may induce Stx-encoding phages and promote gene transfer [14].
It has recently been confirmed that Stx-encoding phages are also induced by high hydrostatic pressure, which is widely used for food preservation. Phages may be induced, and the transfer of pathogenic genes to non-pathogenic E. coli may be facilitated, if treatments designed to ensure the microbiological safety of foods are not performed correctly [15]. Stx-encoding phages can also be induced spontaneously without external induction, indicating that free Stx-encoding phage may appear easily [16, 17].
In this study, Stx-encoding phage was isolated from various environmental samples and transfer of the Shiga toxin gene to non-STEC was confirmed through transduction and expression to investigate the risk of phages in the food chain.
Materials and Methods
Isolation and Purification of the Phages
To isolate phages, seven non-O157 Stx E. coli (STEC) strains from the National Culture Collection for Pathogens (NCCP) were used as host strains: E. coli NCCP13937 (serotype O103), E. coli NCCP14018 (O91), E. coli NCCP13970 (O111), E. coli NCCP13934 (O179), E. coli NCCP 13979 (O104), E. coli NCCP13987 (O55), and E. coli NCCP14010 (O26).
Twelve samples of soil, river water, and domestic sewage were collected from the Seongnam Water Reclamation Center (Korea). The samples were diluted 10 times with LBC broth (Luria Bertani broth + 10 mM CaCl2, Difco Laboratory, USA) and homogenized. The host cultures were inoculated and cultured to a level of 8-9 log CFU/ml at 37°C at 150 rpm (Jeiotech, Korea) for 24 h. After centrifugation at 10,000 ×g for 10 min, the culture supernatants were filtered through a 0.22 μm syringe filter (Millipore, USA). The sterilized supernatants were mixed with 0.6%LBC soft agar and the host strains. Plaque assays were performed using the double overlay agar method on LBC agar and cultured at 37°C for 24 h [18]. The phages from the plaques were separated, purified, and stored in 10%glycerol stock at -80°C in a deep freezer. Purification of the phages was performed using CsCl gradient centrifugation [19]. Concentrated phage was applied to the step gradient solution by CsCl densities of 1.3, 1.45, 1.5, and 1.7 g/cm3 and centrifugated by 78,500 ×g for 2 h (Optima L-100XP, USA). The fraction of 1.45 g/cm3 density was taken by a syringe and dialysed with SM buffer [100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgSO4, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.01% gelatin?
Differentiation and Identification of the Phage Isolates
For differentiation of the isolated phages, tricine SDS-PAGE gels were used to analyze the structural protein patterns. Purified phage solution (16 μl, approximately 9-10 log PFU/ml) and 4 μl of 5× sample buffer (T&I, Korea) were mixed and boiled for 10 min. Gel electrophoresis was performed at 120 V for 60 min. Staining was performed for 1 h with a staining reagent (0.2% w/v Coomassie blue (R-250, T&I), 10% v/v acetic acid, 50% v/v CH3OH, 40% v/v D.W) and decolorized with the reagent (40% v/v methanol, 10% v/v acetic acid, 50% v/v D.W)[20].
Phage DNA was extracted to analyze restriction enzyme patterns. The phage was concentrated to 9-10 log PFU/ml with 20% polyethyleneglycol 80 and treated with DNase and RNase (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Again after treating with proteinase K (Sigma-Aldrich), the lysis buffer [0.5 M EDTA, 10% w/v SDS, 1 M Tris (pH 8.0)] was applied. The proteins and impurities were removed with phenol : chloroform : isoamylalcohol (Sigma-Aldrich), washed with ethanol, and dissolved in diethylpyrocarbonate water (Bioneer, Korea) for use. The extracted DNA and restriction enzymes SalI and SacII (Takara, Japan) were reacted at the optimal temperature and time for each enzyme. The cleaved phage DNA was confirmed by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel [21].
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to analyze the morphological characteristics of Stx-encoding phages. The purified solution was attached to a carbon-coated copper grid (200 mesh, Ted Pella, USA) for 2 min, washed with sterile distilled water, and dehydrated. It was then stained with an equal volume of 2%uranyl acetate for 30 s, washed with distilled water, and dried at room temperature. Negative staining was performed and observed at a magnification of 30,000 at a voltage of 80 kV using a TEM (H-7600, Hitachi, Japan).
Virulence factor Identification and One-Step Growth of the Phages
To analyze the virulence factor profile of the phages, specific primers for stx1, stx2, enterohemolysin-encoding gene (ehxA), autoagglutinating adhesion-encoding gene (saa), and attaching/effacing protein-encoding gene (eae) were used, and the results were confirmed by electrophoresis. The primers and PCR conditions were as previously described [22-26].
The host was cultured to 8-9 log CFU/ml in LBC broth, mixed at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10^-5 with the phages, and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min with shaking at 150 rpm. Centrifugation at 10,000 ×g for 10 min was performed to remove free phage particles from the supernatant. Pellets were suspended in 10 ml of fresh LBC broth, and 100 μl aliquots were taken for the plaque assay. After incubation for 24 h at 37 °C, plaque counts were measured. The latent periods and burst sizes were determined according to Hyman et al. [26].
Stability Analysis of the Phages
To investigate the stability of the phages at high temperature, 100 μl of concentrated phage solution (~ 11 log PFU/ml) was added to a 1.5-ml microtube and incubated at 65-75°C for 30 min using a heat block. A plaque assay for the heated phage was performed using the double overlay method. The number of plaques was counted and compared to that in the unexposed control group. For pH stability, the phage solution (10 μl) was mixed with 990 μl of SM buffer (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgSO4, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) adjusted to pH 2-10 with HCl and NaOH. After incubation at room temperature for 30 min or 1 h, plaque assays were performed using the double overlay method. To investigate the stability of the phages in organic solvents, the final concentration of each alcohol was adjusted to 30-70% by mixing absolute ethanol (Georgia Chem, USA) with the phage, and incubating at room temperature for 30 min and 1 h. Plaque assays were performed using the double overlay method. To investigate the stability of the phages under sodium hypochlorite, the final concentration of sodium hypochlorite was adjusted to 100-500 ppm by mixing 6-14% sodium hypochlorite (Korea) with the phage solution and incubating at room temperature for 30 min or 1 h. Plaque assays were performed using the double overlay method.
Phage Transduction to non Stx-Producing E. coli (STEC) and Lysogenic Cell Preparation
Spot assays were performed to analyze the host infection of nine Stx-encoding phages to the five non-STEC strains of E. coli ATCC 9637, E. coli ATCC 8739, E. coli ATCC 10536, E. coli ATCC 11775, and E. coli ATCC 25922. Plaques were confirmed using spot assays, and the range of host infection was determined.
A phage lysate solution was prepared to produce lysogenic bacteria. One milliliter of LBC broth was inoculated with 10 μl of five non-STEC cultures (8-9 log CFU/ml) and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Ten microliters of phage (8-9 log PFU/ml) was added to the host solution and incubated at 37°C for 2 h. After incubation, 0.1 ml chloroform was added, the solution was vortexed vigorously, centrifuged at 14,000 ×g for 1 min, and the supernatant was transferred to a sterile tube. After treatment with chloroform, the solution was used as a phage lysate solution. The method of Bielaszewska et al. [4] was modified and used for further processing. One milliliter of non-STEC culture was centrifuged at 14,000 ×g for 1 min. The pellet was suspended in 500 μl of CaMg (5 mM CaCl2, 10mM MgSO4) to make a host solution [4]. The solution and phage lysate solution (1:1) were mixed and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. LB broth was added and incubated at 37°C and 150 rpm for 1 h. After centrifugation at 14,000 ×g for 1 min, the pellet was suspended in 1 ml of LBC broth, diluted, and spread on an LBC plate. The plate was incubated at 37°C for 24 h. A colony from each plate was randomly selected and subcultured three times on LBC agar to identify stable lysogenic bacteria. After DNA extraction, PCR with stx1 and stx2 specific primers was performed to confirm whether the convertant cells had the genes.
Expression of stx Genes on the Convertant Strain
To confirm the expression of stx genes in the convertant strains, 100 μl of convertant solution was inoculated in 5 ml CA-YE broth (Himedia,) supplemented with NaCl from 1% to 10% and incubated at 37°C. The supernatant was centrifuged at 1,500 ×g at 4°C for 20 min and refrigerated for verocytotoxin analysis. VTEC-reverse passive latex agglutination toxin detection kits (Denka Sieken Co., Ltd., Japan) were used according to the proposed method [27]. In a 96-well V-bottom microtiter plate, the supernatant was mixed with the supplied diluent at 1 : 1 (25 μl), and the same volume of latex particles sensitized with rabbit polyclonal anti-VT1 or anti-VT2 immunoglobulin G antibody was added. The plates were covered and reacted at room temperature for 20 h, and latex agglutination was examined. The toxins provided with the kit for positive and negative controls were used for each analysis.
Results and Discussion
Phage Isolation and Virulence Factor Identification
A total of 19 phages from 12 samples were isolated from seven non-O157 STEC host strains (Table 1). The phages were selected from different plaques, even in the same samples, and then isolated to purify them. Fifteen phages (79%) were isolated from seven sewage samples, and four phages (21%) were isolated from river water samples. The phages were named ϕNOEC, followed by numbers. Municipal wastewaters and activated sludge contained 8-9 log virus particles/ml, which is the highest concentration among the environments, and the next highest was by marine environments [28-30]. The ratio of virus to bacterial cells in wastewater is approximately 10:1. A total of 55 phages were isolated from the environmental samples using two E. coli O157:H7 and six non-O157 E. coli as host strains [31]. These results indicate that there are many phages in the environment.
Table 1.
Hosts | Phages | Virulence factors | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
stx1 | stx2 | ehxA | saa | eae | ||
E. coli NCCP 13934* | ϕNOEC31 | - | - | - | - | - |
E. coli NCCP 13937 | ϕNOEC32 | - | - | - | - | - |
E. coli NCCP 13987 | ϕNOEC33 | - | - | - | - | - |
E. coli NCCP 13970 | ϕNOEC34 | - | - | - | - | - |
E. coli NCCP 14010 | ϕNOEC35 | - | - | - | - | - |
E. coli NCCP 14018 | ϕNOEC36 | + | - | + | + | + |
E. coli NCCP 13934 | ϕNOEC37 | - | + | + | + | + |
E. coli NCCP 14010 | ϕNOEC38 | - | - | - | - | - |
E. coli NCCP 14018 | ϕNOEC39 | - | - | - | - | - |
E. coli NCCP 13937 | ϕNOEC40 | + | - | + | - | + |
E. coli NCCP 13979 | ϕNOEC41 | + | + | - | + | - |
E. coli NCCP 13979 | ϕNOEC42 | - | - | - | - | - |
E. coli NCCP 13934 | ϕNOEC43 | + | - | - | - | - |
E. coli NCCP 13937 | ϕNOEC44 | - | - | - | - | - |
E. coli NCCP 13979 | ϕNOEC45 | - | + | - | - | - |
E. coli NCCP 13934 | ϕNOEC46 | + | + | + | + | + |
E. coli NCCP 13979 | ϕNOEC47 | + | + | - | + | + |
E. coli NCCP 13979 | ϕNOEC48 | - | - | - | - | - |
E. coli NCCP 13934 | ϕNOEC49 | + | + | + | + | + |
Total | 19 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
*NCCP: National Culture Collection for Pathogens Symbols: +; detected, −; not detected
To identify the virulence factors of the phages, PCR was performed using stx1, stx2, ehxA, saa, and eae-specific primers. For stx1 and stx2, three phages (15%) had only stx1, and two phages (10%) had only stx2. Four phages (21%)—ϕNOEC41, ϕNOEC46, ϕNOEC47, and ϕNOEC49—had both stx1 and stx2, which were focused on further studies. The other virulence factors, ehxA, saa, and eae, were detected in the same proportion as stx. Stx2-encoding phages are widely distributed, and were found to be 32-94% in the environmental samples polluted with feces; however, only 1% of the phages isolated from wastewater or river water had both stx1 and stx2 [32, 33]. Therefore, the Shiga-toxin virulence factor of the phages was distributed widely and in large numbers. As well as stx1 and stx2, the phages also had other virulence factors, and could be considered to be highly harmful.
Structural Characterization of Stx-Encoding Phages
The structural difference of ϕNOEC41, ϕNOEC46, ϕNOEC47, and ϕNOEC49 were investigated using the restriction enzymes SalI, EcoRI, and SacII. SDS-PAGE confirmed that they had different genome structures and protein compositions (Fig. S1). The morphological characteristics of the Stx-encoding phages were analyzed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The Stx-encoding phages ϕNOEC41, ϕNOEC46, ϕNOEC47, and ϕNOEC49 belonged to the Myoviridae family (Fig. 1). ϕNOEC41 had a head diameter of 48 nm, the smallest in the group, and its tail length was 150 nm. The head diameter of ϕNOEC46 was 94 nm, the largest in the group, and its tail length was 121 nm. ϕNOEC47 and ϕNOEC49 were similar, and had dimensions intermediate between those described above.
One-step growth analysis was performed for four Stx-encoding phages. The latent period was 15-25 min, one cycle duration was 25-30 min, and the rise period was 10-15 min, The burst size was approximately 33-441 PFU/infected cells of various sizes. The non-O157 STEC phage group was reported to have a latent period of 25-40 min, a cycle of 45-70 min, and a burst size of 40-176 PFU/infected cells [31]. The isolated non-O157 STEC phage had a burst period of 8-37 min, a burst size of 12-794 PFU/infected cells, and a 19-40 min rise period [34]. Therefore, the characteristics of Stx-encoding phages identified using the one-step growth curve varied, but were similar to those of the previous reported phages.
Stability of Stx-Encoding Phages
ϕNOEC41 and ϕNOEC47 were more stable, with a reduction of 3.6 log PFU/ml and 1.0 log PFU/ml after exposure to 70oC for 30 min, respectively than ϕNOEC46 and ϕNOEC49. ϕNOEC47 showed the highest stability, decreasing by only 2.5 log PFU/ml even at 75°C (Fig. S2-A).
Four Stx-encoding phages showed low stability at pH 2. ϕNOEC41 and ϕNOEC47 showed a maximal decrease of 5.2 log PFU/ml and 6.4 log PFU/ml, respectively (Fig. S2-B). At pH 3-10, the four phages showed a decrease of less than 3 log PFU/ml and were relatively stable, and were similar in same temperature and acidic conditions [31, 34]. Therefore, the stabilities in high temperature and acidic environments were somewhat different among the phages, but all were similar to those previously reported [31, 34].
The phages showed a gradual decrease in count in response to increasing ethanol concentration after treatment for 30 min (Fig. S3). ϕNOEC49 showed a large decrease of up to 4 log PFU/ml at 50%-70% ethanol, and was found to be relatively unstable in ethanol. The Stx2-encoding phage decreased by approximately 6 log PFU/ml in 70%ethanol, and was reported to be unstable [35]. Three non-O157 STEC phages were exposed for 1 h under the same conditions and decreased to 3 log PFU/ml at 30%, 50%, and 70% [31]. Therefore, two of the three Stx-encoding phages were relatively stable in ethanol.
The phages ϕNOEC41, ϕNOEC46, ϕNOEC47, and ϕNOEC49 showed a decrease of only one PFU/ml, indicating very high stability at various concentrations of NaClO (Fig. S3). There was a slight difference in stability among the phages. The stability in sodium hypochlorite was high even at high concentrations of sodium hypochlorite. The STEC phage showed a reduction of 1.1 log PFU/ml when treated with 20 ppm chlorine for 30 min [36]. Stx-encoding phages have been shown to be very stable under food-processing conditions [13, 15, 33, 35, 37]. Therefore, phages with high resistance to inactivation factors might be appropriate candidates for the transfer of toxin genes.
Transduction of Shiga Toxin Phage to Non-STEC and Lysogenic Convertants
To analyze the host infection of Stx-encoding phages, the plaques were identified by spot assay on five non-STEC type strains (Table 2). ϕNOEC43 and ϕNOEC49 infected four of the five strains at a rate of 80%. However, the three phages ϕNOEC41, ϕNOEC45, and ϕNOEC47 showed no infection on any strain. Overall, host infectivity by phage was observed in 18 of 45 (40%) hosts.
Table 2.
Stx-encoding phages | Non-STEC host | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
E. coli ATCC 9637 | E. coli ATCC 8739 | E. coli ATCC 10536 | E. coli ATCC 11775 | E. coli ATCC 25922 | |
ϕNOEC36 | + | + | + | - | - |
ϕNOEC37 | + | - | + | - | - |
ϕNOEC40 | + | - | + | - | - |
ϕNOEC41 | - | - | - | - | - |
ϕNOEC43 | + | + | + | + | - |
ϕNOEC45 | - | - | - | - | - |
ϕNOEC46 | + | - | + | + | - |
ϕNOEC47 | - | - | - | - | - |
ϕNOEC49 | + | + | + | - | + |
Symbols: +, plaque detected; −, plaque not detected
Lysogenic cells for five non-STEC hots were prepared with above phage lysates. Infection occurred in seven of the 18 (39%) hosts sabilized. PCR was performed using a stx-specific primer (Table 3). Transduction of ϕNOEC36, ϕNOEC40, and ϕNOEC43, which had only the stx1 gene, was confirmed without loss of the gene in E. coli ATCC 9637 and E. coli ATCC 11775. Transduction of ϕNOEC46 and ϕNOEC49, which had the stx1 and stx2 genes, led to the gain of stx1 and sometimes loss of the stx2 gene. There was one E. coli ATCC 25922 convertant cell with both stx1 and stx2, which was lysogenized by ϕOEC49. Thus, transfer of the stx2 gene is limited during transduction in some strains. Transduction of pathogenic gene-carrying phages is suggested to occur in 29% and 30% of the receptor strains for non-pathogenic E. coli, and to be a lysogenic bacterium, capable of transferring toxic genes [4, 38]. Thus, the presence of temperate phage in the environment would present a hazard for food-borne poisoning by means of transduction in the food chain.
Table 3.
Host and convertant E. coli | stx1 | stx2 |
---|---|---|
E. coli ATCC 9637 | - | - |
E. coli ATCC 9637 (ϕNOEC36) | + | - |
E. coli ATCC 9637 (ϕNOEC40) | + | - |
E. coli ATCC 9637 (ϕNOEC46) | + | - |
E. coli ATCC 9637 (ϕNOEC49) | + | - |
E. coli ATCC 11775 | - | - |
E. coli ATCC 11775 (ϕNOEC43) | + | - |
E. coli ATCC 11775 (ϕNOEC46) | + | - |
E. coli ATCC 25922 | - | - |
E. coli ATCC 25922 (ϕNOEC49) | + | + |
Symbols: +, detected; −, not detected
Expression of Toxic Genes of the Convertant E. coli under Saline Conditions
The conversion of bacteria by the transduction of the phages might contaminate foods and be exposed to the osmotic pressures of various food components. Convertant E. coli ATCC 25922 (ϕNOEC49) was cultured under osmotic stress conditions on LBC media with 1-10% salt to confirm the expression of stx toxin genes. The convertant grew well from 2.5 log CFU/ml to 6-8 log CFU/ml at a concentration of 6% NaCl (Fig. 2). Using the VTEC-RPLA toxin detection kit, four titers of Stx1 and 16 titers of Stx2 toxins were expressed in the culture solution of 8 log CFU/ml in media with 1-2% salt. At 4% salt, 64 titers of Stx1 and 32 titer of Stx2 toxins on 7 log CFU/ml were expressed. For a higher salt concentration (6%), the highest concentration of Stx1 was expressed by 128 titers, and 16 titers of Stx2 toxin were expressed at 6 log CFU/ml. Stx1 and Stx2 toxins were not expressed at 2-4 log CFU/ml under conditions of 8% and 10% salt. The stx1 gene was highly expressed in proportion to the salt concentration, and was 32 times higher in 6% salt than that in low-salt conditions. Shiga toxin producing E. coli grows in 5.25% salt media, so the characteristics of the convertant may be related to cell growth [39]. The transcription of stx1A and stx2A in enterohemorrhagic E. coli was six and two times higher, respectively, than under low-salt conditions, indicating that high transcription of the toxin genes is induced in response to long-term osmotic stress produced by a salt concentration of 4.5% [40].
In conclusion, Stx-encoding phages isolated from the environment were found to be highly stable under extreme conditions. The Shiga toxin genes of phage could be transferred to non-toxigenic E. coli by transduction, and could be expressed in the convertant cell. Therefore, the transfer of pathogenic genes from Stx-encoding phages may pose a risk to human health. In the case of inadequate sterilization of food exposed to various environments, there is a possibility that the toxicity of the temperate phages might increase.
Supplemental Materials
Supplementary data for this paper are available on-line only at http://jmb.or.kr.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (Grant # 2020R1F1A107000111).
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no financial conflict of interest to declare.
REFERENCES
- 1.Herold S, Karch H, Schmidt H. Shiga toxin-encoding phages-genomes in motion. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2004;294:115–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2004.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Calderwood SB, Auclair F, Donohue-Rolfe A, Keusch GT, Mekalanos JJ. Nucleotide sequence of the Shiga-like toxin genes of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1987;84:4364–4368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.13.4364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jackson MP, Neill RJ, O'Brien AD, Holmes RK, Newland JW. Nucleotide sequence analysis and comparison of the structural genes for Shiga-like toxin I and Shiga-like toxin II encoded by bacteriophages from Escherichia coli 933. FEMS. Microbiol. Lett. 1987;44:109–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1987.tb02252.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bielaszewska M, Prager R, Köck R, Mellmann A, Zhang W, Tschäpe H, et al. Shiga toxin gene loss and transfer in vitro and in vivo during enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O26 infection in humans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007;73:3144–3150. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02937-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Elliott SJ, Wainwright LA, McDaniel TK, Jarvis KG, Deng Y, Lai LC, et al. The complete sequence of the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 1998;28:1–4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00783.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Perna NT, Mayhew GF, Pósfai G, Elliott S, Donnenberg MS, Kaper JB, et al. Molecular evolution of a pathogenicity island from enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Infect. Immun. 1998;66:3810–3817. doi: 10.1128/IAI.66.8.3810-3817.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Karmali MA. Host and pathogen determinants of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli associated hemolytic uremic syndrome. Kidney Int. 2009;112:S4–S7. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Croxen MA, Law RJ, Scholz R, Keeney KM, Wlodarska M, Finlay BB. Recent advances in understanding enteric pathogenic Escherichia coli. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2013;26:822–880. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00022-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weitz JS, Poisot T, Meyer JR, Flores CO, Valverde S, Sullivan MB, et al. Phage-bacteria infection networks. Trends Microbiol. 2012;21:82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2012.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Neely MN, Friedman DI. Arrangement and functional identification of genes in the regulatory region of lambdoid phage H-19B, a carrier of a Shiga-like toxin. Gene. 1998;223:105–113. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(98)00236-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Johnson AD, Poteete AR, Lauer G, Sauer RT, Ackers GK, Ptashne M. λ repressor and cro-components of an efficient molecular switch. Nature. 1981;294:217–223. doi: 10.1038/294217a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fang Y, Mercer RG, McMullen LM, Gänzle MG. Induction of Shiga toxin-encoding prophage by abiotic environmental stress in food. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017;83:e01378–17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01378-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ye WF, Du M, Zu MJ. High temperature in combination with UV irradiation enhances horizontal transfer of stx2 gene from E. coli O157:H7 to non-pathogenic E. coli. PLoS One. 2012;7:e31308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Los JM, Los M, Wegrzyn A, Wegrzyn Z. Hydrogen peroxide‐mediated induction of the Shiga toxin‐converting lambdoid prophage ST2‐8624 in Escherichia coli O157:H7. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2010;58:322–329. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2009.00644.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Aertsen A, De Spiegeleer P, Vanoirbeek K, Lavilla M, Michiels CW. Induction of oxidative stress by high hydrostatic pressure in Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005;71:2226–2231. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2226-2231.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Krüger A, Paula MA, Lucchesi A. Shiga toxins and stx phages: highly diverse entities. Microbiol.-Reading. 2014;161:451–462. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wagner PL, Waldor MK. Bacteriophage control of bacterial virulence. Infect. Immun. 2002;70:3985–399. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.8.3985-3993.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kropinski AM, Mazzocco A, Waddell TE, Lingohr E, Johnson RP. Enumeration of bacteriophages by double agar overlay plaque assay. In: Clokie MRJ, Kropinski AM, editors. Bacteriophages, Vol. 1. Humana Press; New York, USA: 2009. pp. 69–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Klaenhammer TR, McKay LL. Isolation and examination of transducing bacteriophage particles from Streptococcus lactis C2. J. Dairy Sci. 1975;59:396–404. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(76)84219-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kutter E. Phage host range and efficiency of plating. In: Clokie MRJ, Kropinski AM, editors. Bacteriophages, Vol. 1. Humana Press; New York, USA: 2009. pp. 141–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lee YD, Kim JY, Park JH. Characteristics of coliphage ECP4 and potential use as a sanitizing agent for biocontrol of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Food Control. 2013;34:255–260. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.04.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Amisano G, Fornasero S, Migliaretti G, Caramello S, Tarasco V, Savino F. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in acute gastroenteritis in infants in North-West Italy. New Microbiologica. 2011;34:45–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gerrish RS, Lee JE, Reed J, Williams J, Farrell LD, Spiegel KM, et al. PCR versus hybridization for detecting virulence genes of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2007;13:1253. doi: 10.3201/eid1308.060428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sánchez S, García-Sánchez A, Martínez R, Blanco J, Blanco JE, Blanco M, et al. Detection and characterisation of Shiga toxinproducing Escherichia coli other than Escherichia coli O157:H7 in wild ruminants. Vet. J. 2009;180:384–38. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schmidt H, Beutin L, Karch H. Molecular analysis of the plasmid-encoded hemolysin of Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain EDL 933. Infect. Immun. 1995;63:1055–1061. doi: 10.1128/IAI.63.3.1055-1061.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hyman P, Abedon ST. Practicla methods for determing phage growth papameters Phage host range and efficiency of plating. In: Clokie MRJ, Kropinski AM, editors. Bacteriophages, Vol. 1. Humana Press; New York, USA: 2009. pp. 175–202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Speirs J, Stavric S, Buchanan B. Assessment of two commercial agglutination kits for detecting Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin. Can. J. Microbiol. 1991;37:877–880. doi: 10.1139/m91-151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Otawa K, Lee SH, Yamazoe A, Onuki M, Satoh H, Mino T. Abundance, diversity, dynamics of viruses on microorganisms in activated sludge processes. Microb. Ecol. 2007;53:143–152. doi: 10.1007/s00248-006-9150-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wu Q, Liu W. Determination of virus abundance, diversity and distribution in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Water Res. 2009;43:1101–1109. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rohwer F, Thurber RV. Viruses manipulate the marine environment. Nature. 2009;459:207–212. doi: 10.1038/nature08060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kim EJ, Chang HJ, Kwak S, Park JH. Virulence factors and stability of coliphages specific to Escherichia coli O157:H7 and to various E. coli infection. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016;20:2060–2066. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1609.09039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dumke R, Schröter-Bobsin U, Jacobs E, Röske I. Detection of phages carrying the Shiga toxin 1 and 2 genes in waste water and river water samples. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2006;42:48–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01809.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Imamovic L, Ballested E, Jofre J, Muniesa M. Quantification of Shiga toxin-converting bacteriophages in wastewater and in fecal samples by real-time quantitative PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010;76:5693–5701. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00107-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pushpinder KL, Joyjit S, Divya J. Characterization of bacteriophages targeting non-O157 Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli. J. Food Prot. 2018;81:785–794. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rode TM, Axelsson A, Granum PE, Heir E, Holck A, L'Abée-Lund TM. High stability of Stx2 phage in food and under foodprocessing conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011;77:5336–5341. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00180-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Muniesa M, Lucena F, Jofre J. Comparative survival of free Shiga toxin 2-encoding phages and Escherichia coli strains outside the gut. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999;65:5615–5618. doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.12.5615-5618.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Allué-Guardia A, Martínez-Castillo A, Muniesa M. Persistence of infectious Stx bacteriophages after disinfection treatments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014;80:2142–2149. doi: 10.1128/AEM.04006-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schmidt H. Shiga-toxin-converting bacteriophages. Res. Microbiol. 2001;152:687–695. doi: 10.1016/S0923-2508(01)01249-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yoo BB, Liu Y, Juneja V, Huang L, Hwang CA. Effect of environmental stresses on the survival and cytotoxicity of Shiga toxinproducing Escherichia coli. Food Qual. Safety. 2017;1:139–146. doi: 10.1093/fqsafe/fyx010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Olesen I, Lene L. Relative gene transcription and pathogenicity of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli after long-term adaptation to acid and salt stress. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010;141:248–253. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.