Skip to main content
BMC Pulmonary Medicine logoLink to BMC Pulmonary Medicine
. 2022 Nov 29;22:453. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02248-9

Analysis of molecular pathologic and clinical features of 36 patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma

Yingying Yu 1,2, Xiumei Duan 3, Shuai Wang 4, Hua He 1, Shijie Lan 1, Zhen Guo 1, Di Wu 1,✉
PMCID: PMC9710017  PMID: 36447228

Abstract

Background

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a heterogeneous disease with poor prognosis. It is essential to understand the molecular basis of its progression in order to devise novel therapeutic strategies. The aim of this study was to identify the pathological mutations in PSC through next generation sequencing technology (NGS), and provide reference for the diagnosis and molecular targeted therapy.

Materials and methods

Thirty-sex patients with pathologically confirmed PSC who underwent surgical tumor resection at The First Hospital of Jilin University and Jilin Cancer Hospital from June 2011 to June 2017 were enrolled. Thirteen patients were successfully followed up and detailed clinical data were obtained. NGS was performed for the exons of entire oncogenes. Kaplan–Meier method was used for the univariate analysis, and the Cox proportional risk regression model was used for multivariate analysis.

Results

A total of 19 highly frequent mutations were identified, of which the KRAS, BRCA1 and ALK mutations were significantly correlated with the overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis showed that KRAS mutation was an independent factor affecting the OS of PSC patients.

Conclusion

The KRAS mutation is an independent prognostic factor for PSC, and patients harboring the KRAS mutation had significantly shorter OS compared to patients with wild type KRAS. The characteristic mutation landscape of PSC may guide clinical targeted therapy.

Keywords: Next generation sequencing, Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma, Genetic mutation, Molecular characterization, Clinical features


Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma(PSC) is a rare type of non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) with sarcomatoid cell or sarcomatoid (spindle/giant cell) differentiation, and accounts for about 0.1–0.4% of all NSCLC cases [1]. In the 2015 edition, WHO classified PSC into 5 subtypes, including pleomorphic carcinoma, spindle cell carcinoma, giant cell carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, and pulmonary blastoma [2]. Pleomorphic carcinoma is the most common subtype, and is defined as a class of poorly differentiated NSCLC, i.e., squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or large cell carcinoma containing at least 10% spindle cells and/or giant cells [3]. Spindle cell carcinoma consists only of spindle cells that are tightly nested and arranged in irregular bundles, and resemble those seen in pleomorphic carcinoma [4]. Giant cell carcinoma is composed exclusively of giant cells, including polymorphic mononuclear and/or multinucleated neoplastic giant cells. Unlike the giant cells observed in pleomorphic carcinoma, those in giant cell carcinoma are mostly dispersed [4]. Carcinosarcoma is a mixed malignancy consisting of NSCLC cells (mainly squamous or adenocarcinoma cells) and sarcomatous cells (rhabdomyosarcoma, chondrosarcoma and osteosarcoma cells), and has bidirectional differentiation characteristics. Carcinosarcoma and pleomorphic carcinoma are primarily distinguished on the basis of these heterologous components [4]. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common type of epithelial tumor, followed by adenocarcinoma and adeno-squamous carcinoma. The most common mesenchymal tumor is rhabdomyosarcoma, followed by osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma [5]. Pulmonary blastoma is a rare malignancy comprising of primitive epithelial and mesenchymal cells similar to well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma.

PSC patients do not exhibit any obvious clinical symptoms at the early stage, and most of them are diagnosed at the advanced stage that precludes the possibility of surgery. In addition, PSC is recalcitrant to the conventional chemotherapeutic drugs for lung cancer, which seriously affects the quality of life and prognosis of patients [1]. In this study, we performed high-throughput sequencing on the tumor specimens collected from 36 PSC patients to identify mutations in the oncogene exons. The influence of the clinical characteristics and gene mutations on the overall survival (OS) of the patients were analyzed to identify possible therapeutic targets.

Materials and methods

Pathological-diagnosis

The patients were diagnosed on the basis of the 2015WHO edition [2].

NGS platform

The whole sequencing reaction of NGS is carried out on the chip, which can rapidly generate millions of DNA and RNA fragments in a short time, and sequence millions of sites at the same time [6]. With the continuous development of this technology, the advantages in accuracy, sensitivity, price and other aspects continue to show. At present, NGS is widely used in the field of human life science research, which is of great significance in further understanding the relationship between gene mutations and human health and diseases.

Patients

Using the case retrieval system databases of the First Hospital of Jilin University and Jilin Cancer Hospital, 17 and 19 patients who respectively underwent surgical resection from June 2011 to June 2017 were selected. Tumor staging was established according to the seventh edition of the AJCC guidelines, and the clinical data of the patients was retrieved (Table 1). Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue blocks were obtained, and 10 slices measuring 10-μm in thickness were prepared for each patient. Kalpan-Meier univariate analysis and COX multivariate analysis were performed on 13 patients with complete follow-up information, and 23 patients with missing follow-up information were excluded.

Table 1.

Clinical features of 36 PSC patients

Variable Total (%)
Sex
Male 25 (69.4)
Female 11 (30.6)
Age
 > 60 21 (58.3)
 ≤ 60 15 (41.7)
Smoking status
Smkers 26 (72.2)
Nonsmkers 10 (27.8)
Tumor size
 > 5 cm 16 (44.4)
 ≤ 5 cm 20 (55.6)
Tumor site
Left 18 (50.0)
Right 18 (50.0)
T stage
T1 and T2 28 (77.8)
T3 and T4 8 (22.2)
N stage
N0 and N1 28 (77.8)
N2 and N3 8 (22.2)
Clinical stage
Ia and IIa 21 (58.3)
IIb and IIIb 15 (41.7)
Pathological type
Pleomorphic carcinoma 31 (86.1)
other 5 (13.9)
Treatment
Surgery 24 (66.7)
Surgeryand chemotherapy 12 (33.3)

Follow-up

Thirty-six patients were followed up by telephone interviews, and the last follow-up was conducted on January 30, 2018. Twenty-three were lost during the follow-up, and the prognostic information of 13 patients were subsequently analyzed. Survival duration was calculated from the time of diagnosis to that of the last follow-up or death.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed by SPSS 22.0 statistical software. Univariate survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan–Meier method, and Log-rank test was used to compare the groups (test level a = 0.05). Cox proportional risk regression model was used for multivariate survival analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Identification of prognostic factors of PSC

Univariate analysis of 13 patients that were successfully followed-up showed that gender, age, smoking status, tumor diameter, tumor location, clinical stage, pathological classification and treatment were not significantly correlated to the OS (P > 0.05).

Multivariate Cox regression further showed that gender, age, smoking status, tumor diameter, tumor location, T stage, N stage, clinical stage, pathological classification and treatment were not independent factors affecting the OS of PSC patients (P > 0.05).

Pathological characteristics

Immunostaining of the tumors specimens showed that 100% of the patients were positive for CK and Vimentin, while the positive rates for CK5/6, CK7, TTF-1 and P63 were 36.1%, 63.9%, 63.9% and 47.2% respectively (Table 2).

Table 2.

Immunohistochemical characteristics

Immunophenotype Total (%)
CK 36 (100)
CK5/6 13 (36.1)
CK7 23 (63.9)
Vimentin 36 (100)
TTF-1 23 (63.9)
P63 17 (47.2)

The immunophenotypes are the result of both differentiated and undifferentiated cells (Fig. 1). Histopathological examination indicated presence of squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and at least 10% spindle cells (Fig. 2). The giant cell carcinoma specimens were positive for both CK7 and Vimentin (Fig. 3), and comprised entirely of polymorphic mononuclear and/or multinuclear neoplastic giant cells (Fig. 4).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Immunohistochemical characteristics of pleomorphic carcinoma A CK7 positive (HE, × 10); B Vimentin spindle composition expression (HE, × 10) C P63 squamous carcinoma expression (the lower right), adenocarcinoma of the negative (the upper left) (HE, × 10); D TTF-1 adenocarcinoma components expression, squamous cell carcinoma components negative (HE, × 4); E TTF-1 spindle composition expression (HE, × 10)

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Histopathological features of pleomorphic carcinoma A adenocarcinoma and spindle cell components (HE, × 10); B squamous cell carcinoma components (HE, × 10); C squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma components (HE, × 10)

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Immunohistochemical characteristics of giant cell carcinoma A CK7 positive (HE, × 20); B Vimentin positive (HE, × 20)

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Histopathological features of giant cell carcinoma A Giant cell carcinoma consists of mononuclear neoplastic giant cells (HE, × 20) B Giant cell carcinoma (HE, × 40)

Frequency of gene mutations

NGS revealed 19 high-frequency mutations, including TP53 (69.4%), PKD1 (38.9%), THADA (33.3%), RB1 single copy deletion (30.6%),KRAS (30.6%), PIK3CA (25.0%), EGFR (19.4%), NF1 (16.7%), PTCH1 (16.7%), BRCA1 (16.7%), BRAF (16.7%), ARID1A (16.7%), mTOR (16.7%), MET (13.9%), CREBBP (11.1%), ARID2 (11.1%), ALK (11.1%), CDK12 (8.3%) and EMLA4-ALK fusion (5.6%).

Association between gene mutation and OS

Of the 13 patients that were followed up, 6 harbored KRAS mutations and 7 patients had the wild-type KRAS, and the KRASmutant group had significantly worse OS compared to the wild-type controls (P = 0.018; Table 3; Fig. 5). There were 2 patients with BRCA1 mutation and 11 patients with BRCA1 wild-type, and the mutation significantly affected patient prognosis (P < 0.0001; Table 3; Fig. 6). However, given the miniscule size of the BRCA1mutant group, the above results need further clinical validation. Only one patient had an ALK mutation, which was associated significantly with the OS (P = 0.038; Table 3), although its clinical relevance needs clarification. No BRAF and MET mutations were detected among the 13 patients, while TP53, PKD1, THADA, RB1 single copy deletion, PIK3CA, EGFR and NF1, PTCH1 and ARID1A, MTOR, CREBBP, ARID2, CDK12 and EMLA4-ALK fusion had no significant effect on the OS (P > 0.05).

Table 3.

Univariate survival analysis of gene mutation

Variable p Values
TP53 0.913
PKD1 0.284
THADA 0.506
RB1 single copy deletion 0.532
KRAS 0.018a
PIK3CA 0.908
EGFR 0.456
NF1 0.261
PTCH1 0.115
BRCA1 0.000a
ARID1A 0.178
MTOR 0.590
CREBBP 0.649
ARID2 0.297
ALK 0.038a
CDK12 0.261
EMLA4-ALK fusion 0.261

ap < 0.05

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Comparison of survival curves between KRASmutant and KRAS wild-type

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Comparison of survival curves between BRCA1mutant and BRCA1 wild-type

Cox proportional risk regression model further showed that the KRAS mutation was an independent prognostic for PSC (Table 4).

Table 4.

Multivariate survival analysis of gene mutation

Variable B SE Pvalues Exp(B) 95%CI
TP53 −0.119 1.084 0.913 0.888 0.106–7.438
PKD1 0.782 0.745 0.294 2.185 0.507–9.416
THADA 0.486 0.738 0.510 1.626 0.383–6.908
RB1 single copy deletion −0.659 1.073 0.539 0.518 0.063–4.236
KRAS 1.779 0.839 0.034a 5.921 1.143–30.64
PIK3CA −0.085 0.738 0.908 0.918 0.216–3.902
EGFR −0.782 1.074 0.467 0.458 0.056–3.756
NF1 −3.259 4.561 0.475 0.038 0.00–293.04
PTCH1 1.285 0.871 0.140 3.616 0.655–19.96
BRCA1 9.870 35.918 0.783 19,334.66 5.165E−27–7.238E + 34
ARID1A −1.351 1.077 0.210 0.259 0.031–2.136
MTOR −0.443 0.828 0.593 0.642 0.127–3.255
CREBBP 0.495 1.099 0.652 1.641 0.190–14.140
ARID2 1.142 1.156 0.323 3.134 0.325–30.215
ALK 2.350 1.415 0.097 10.488 0.656–167.810
CDK12 −3.259 4.561 0.475 0.038 0.000–293.024
EMLA4-ALKfusion 0.446 1.073 0.677 1.562 0.191–12.798

ap < 0.05

Discussion

PSC is a rare lung malignancy that accounts for about 2%-3% of all NSCLC cases [1, 7]. The obvious heterogeneity of PSC not only increases the difficulty of clinical diagnosis, but also decreases the efficacy of conventional therapies [8, 9]. Therefore, it is crucial to identify novel prognostic factors and therapeutic factors to improve patient prognosis. The identification of panoramic oncogene exons through NGS has accelerated the development of molecular targeted therapies for lung adenocarcinoma, malignant melanoma, breast cancer and other tumors based on specific gene mutations. This approach is particularly effective for screening mutations associated with rare malignancies, such as PSC.

In this study, the average age of the PSC patients was 60 years, which is consistent with previous reports indicating that PSC is more prevalent in middle-aged and elderly men with 60–66 years of age [1]. In addition, previous studies have shown that clinicopathological features such as tumor diameter > 5 cm, clinical stage > I and lymph node invasion portend worse survival in PSC patients, and early surgical treatment may improve prognosis [10]. However, we did not detect any significant association of smoking status, tumor diameter, clinical stage and surgical treatment with the survival of PSC patients.

Mutations in TP53, PKD1, THADA, RB1 (single copy deletion), KRAS, PIK3CA, EGFR, NF1, PTCH1, BRCA1, BRAF, ARID1A, mTOR, MET, CREBBP, ARID2, ALK, CDK12 and EMLA4-ALK (fusion) were frequent in the tumor specimens obtained from 36 PSC patients. Previous reports on the frequency of gene mutations in PSC were largely focused on the European population, and the mutations were mostly sporadic. Almost 50% of the NSCLC patients harbor mutations in the TP53 gene, which is closely related to the occurrence and development of tumors [11]. However, the frequency of TP53 mutations in our cohort was 69.4%, which was the highest compared to that observed for other genes. Previous studies have shown that TP53 mutations in PSC are accompanied by other mutations, suggesting that mutated TP53 may not be the driver gene for PSC but rather augment genomic instability [12]. Since multiple gene mutations drive tumor growth, recovery of TP53 function can trigger apoptosis and clear the tumor cells [13].

In our study, the frequency of KRAS mutation was 30.6%, which is consistent with the reported mutation rate of 15%-30% in cancer. The PSC patients harboring KRAS mutations had worse overall survival compared to those with wild-type KRAS. Another study conducted on 46 cancer patients found that KRAS mutations increased the risk of metastasis, recurrence and death [14]. In addition, Fallet et al. [15] showed that all cancer patients with KRAS mutation have the wild-type EGFR, which was also observed in our study. However, the underlying mechanism needs to be further clarified. Nevertheless, the frequency of EGFR mutations in cancer patients is ambiguous. For instance, while one study reported that EGFR mutations occur in 9% of cancer patients [16], another study conducted on the Asian population found the mutation frequency of EGFR was 20% [17]. In our study, the frequency of EGFR mutations in the PSC patients was 19.4%, which was similar to the data on the Asian population. This suggests that the EGFR mutation may be closely related to race and ethnicity. Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting EGFR have shown encouraging results, there is no data to support their efficacy against PSC.

Exon 14 skipping in MET occurs in about 3% of the NSCLC patients. Recent studies have shown that MET mutations are more common in sarcomatoid lung cancer than NSCLC [18, 19]. One study reported MET mutation frequency of 22.2% (8/36) among PSC patients [20], which was significantly higher than the 13.9% observed in our study. This can be attributed to differences in ethnicity and the small sample size. Other small sample studies and case reports have demonstrated that c-Met inhibitors (such as crizotinib and capotinib) may be effective against tumors with exon 14 jumping mutations of MET. Since none of patients in our cohort were treated with c-Met inhibitors, we cannot determine their efficacy in patients with PSC. We also detected mutations in PKD1, THADA, RB1, NF1, PTCH1, BRCA1 and BRAF, of which BRCA1 mutations were prognostically relevant, although little is known regarding their role in PSC.

In conclusion, the overall survival of the KRAS wild-type PSC patients was better compared to those harboring the KRAS mutations. Thus, detection of KRAS mutations can not only guide targeted therapy, but also predict prognosis. Although BRCA1 gene mutation was also identified as a prognostic factor, given the small sample size and racial differences, the result may have been biased and thus needs to be clarified in future studies. Therefore, it is worth conducting NGS using blood or tumor tissue specimens to detect germ-line mutations, and provide a basis for diagnosis and individualized treatment.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Author contributions

DW designed the research. YYY wrote the first draft of manuscript. HH contributed to the analysis of data. YYY, XMD, SW contributed in the data collection; SJL and ZG conducted the project and revised the whole manuscript. DW had primary responsibility for final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

There was no funding for this study.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of The First Hospital of Jilin University and all patients provided written informed consent. This study were performed in accordance with declarations of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Yingying Yu, Email: 18843106078@163.com.

Xiumei Duan, Email: xmduan@jlu.edu.cn.

Shuai Wang, Email: wshui12345@sina.com.

Hua He, Email: hehua0810@jlu.edu.cn.

Shijie Lan, Email: lanshijie@jlu.edu.cn.

Zhen Guo, Email: gzhen0906@sina.com.

Di Wu, Email: wudi1971@jlu.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.Shum E, Stuart M, Borczuk A, et al. Recent advances in the management of pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2016;10(4):407–416. doi: 10.1586/17476348.2016.1157475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Travis WD, Brambilla E, Burke AP, et al. Introduction to the 2015 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the lung, pleura, thymus, and heart. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10(9):1240–1242. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nakajima M, Kasai T, Hashimoto H, et al. Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung: a clinicopathologic study of 37 cases. Cancer. 1999;86(4):608–616. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990815)86:4<608::AID-CNCR9>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Travis WDBE, Burke AP, Marx A, et al. World Health Organization classification of tumours of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart. 4. Lyon: WHO Press; 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Koss MN, Hochholzer L, Frommelt RA. Carcinosarcomas of the lung: a clinicopathologic study of 66 patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23(12):1514–1526. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199912000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mestan KK, Ilkhanoff L, Mouli S, et al. Genomic sequencing in clinical trials. J Transl Med. 2011;9:222. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weissferdt A, Kalhor N, Rodriguez CJ, et al. Spindle cell and pleomorphic (“sarcomatoid”) carcinomas of the lung: an immunohistochemical analysis of 86 cases. Hum Pathol. 2017;59:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cai YR, Gong L, Teng XY, et al. Clonality and allelotype analyses of focal nodular hyperplasia compared with hepatocellular adenoma and carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(37):4695–4708. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Behjati S, Tarpey PS. What is next generation sequencing? Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Educ. 2013;98(6):236–238. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lin Y, Yang H, Cai Q, et al. Characteristics and prognostic analysis of 69 patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol. 2016;39(3):215–222. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chang YL, Wu CT, Shih JY, et al. EGFR and p53 status of pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma: implications for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy of an aggressive lung malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(10):2952–2960. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1621-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lococo F, Gandolfi G, Rossi G, et al. Deep Sequencing Analysis Reveals That KRAS Mutation Is a Marker of Poor Prognosis in Patients with Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11(8):1282–1292. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yendamuri S, Caty L, Pine M, et al. Outcomes of sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database analysis. Surgery. 2012;152(3):397–402. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yvorel V, Patoir A, Casteillo F, et al. PD-L1 expression in pleomorphic, spindle cell and giant cell carcinoma of the lung is related to TTF-1, p40 expression and might indicate a worse prognosis[J] PLoS ONE. 2017;12(7):e0180346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fallet V, Saffroy R, Girard N, et al. High-throughput somatic mutation profiling in pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinomas using the LungCarta Panel: exploring therapeutic targets. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(8):1748–1753. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Leone A, Graziano P, Gasbarra R, et al. Identification of EGFR mutations in lung sarcomatoid carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2011;128(3):732–735. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kaira K, Horie Y, Ayabe E, et al. Pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma: a clinicopathological study including EGFR mutation analysis. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(4):460–465. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ce3e3c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Awad MM, Oxnard GR, Jackman DM, et al. MET exon 14 mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer are associated with advanced age and stage-dependent MET genomic amplification and c-Met overexpression. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(7):721–730. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.4600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Saffroy R, Fallet V, Girard N, et al. MET exon 14 mutations as targets in routine molecular analysis of primary sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung. Oncotarget. 2017;8(26):42428–42437. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li X, Wang D, Zhao Q, et al. Clinical significance and next-generation sequencing of Chinese pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):3947. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04296-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.


Articles from BMC Pulmonary Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES