Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Nov 30;17(11):e0266336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266336

Inflammatory responses in SARS-CoV-2 associated Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome and Kawasaki Disease in children: An observational study

G Biesbroek 1,*, B Kapitein 2,#, I M Kuipers 3,#, M P Gruppen 1, D van Stijn 1, T E Peros 2, M van Veenendaal 4, M H A Jansen 4, C W van der Zee 5, M van der Kuip 1, E G J von Asmuth 6, M G Mooij 6, M E J den Boer 7, G W Landman 8, M A van Houten 9, D Schonenberg-Meinema 1, A M Tutu van Furth 1, M Boele van Hensbroek 1, H Scherpbier 1, K E van Meijgaarden 10, T H M Ottenhoff 10, S A Joosten 10, N Ketharanathan 11, M Blink 12, C L H Brackel 5,13, H L Zaaijer 14, P Hombrink 15, J M van den Berg 1, E P Buddingh 6,‡, T W Kuijpers 1,15,‡
Editor: Tariq Jamal Siddiqi16
PMCID: PMC9710748  PMID: 36449533

Abstract

Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) is a severe inflammatory disease in children related to SARS-CoV-2 with multisystem involvement including marked cardiac dysfunction and clinical symptoms that can resemble Kawasaki Disease (KD). We hypothesized that MIS-C and KD might have commonalities as well as unique inflammatory responses and studied these responses in both diseases. In total, fourteen children with MIS-C (n=8) and KD (n=6) were included in the period of March-June 2020. Clinical and routine blood parameters, cardiac follow-up, SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies and CD4+ T-cell responses, and cytokine-profiles were determined in both groups. In contrast to KD patients, all MIS-C patients had positive Spike protein-specific CD3+CD4+ T-cell responses. MIS-C and KD patients displayed marked hyper-inflammation with high expression of serum cytokines, including the drug-targetable interleukin (IL)-6 and IFN-γ associated chemokines CXCL9, 10 and 11, which decreased at follow-up. No statistical differences were observed between groups. Clinical outcomes were all favourable without cardiac sequelae at 6 months follow-up. In conclusion, MIS-C and KD-patients both displayed cytokine-associated hyper-inflammation with several high levels of drug-targetable cytokines.

Background

Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in children is generally mild or asymptomatic [1–3], children can get seriously ill with systemic inflammation [4–9]. These children present with fever and multi-organ inflammation and dysfunction with clinical features reminiscent of Kawasaki Disease (KD) and evidence of past or recent SARS-CoV-2 exposure. This syndrome is defined as multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) by the World Health Organization (WHO) [10] and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [11]. Cases of MIS-C are typically observed 3-6 weeks after a local peak of SARS-CoV-2 infections in the population and there is usually a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or exposure prior to symptom onset [7, 12]. About 80% of the MIS-C cases test positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and a minority test positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR [12, 13], supporting the notion that SARS-CoV-2 triggers this disease.

KD and Kawasaki Disease Shock Syndrome (KDSS), a more severe presentation of KD, are well-known inflammatory diseases in children. The etiology of KD is not yet fully understood, although a viral trigger is likely, given its seasonal occurrence and reported associations with several viruses, including non-pandemic coronaviruses [14–16]. Despite the similarities, there are notable differences in clinical presentation between MIS-C and KD patients. Children with MIS-C are generally older than children with classic KD and present more often with shock and marked myocardial dysfunction. Furthermore, gastrointestinal symptoms are more frequently observed and MIS-C patients sometimes lack typical signs of KD (i.e. mucosal involvement and/or strawberry tongue, conjunctivitis, rash, erythema and edema of hands and feet and cervical lymphadenopathy) [4–9]. Given the severity of both diseases, it is important to evaluate the immune cascade in both diseases to potentially optimize treatment and outcome. Hence, we compared clinical and inflammatory responses in children with MIS-C and children with KD.

Methods

Patients

Two prospective cohort groups included between March-June 2020 were studied: one group consisted of eight MIS-C patients, the other of six KD patients.

Patients with MIS-C were included in a nationwide cohort of SARS-CoV-2 infected pediatric patients (Clinical features of COVID-19 in Pediatric Patients” (COPP)-study, www.covidkids.nl). All these patients met the CDC [11] or WHO criteria for MIS-C [10] (S1 File). Patients with KD were enrolled in the ongoing study ‘Etiology, course and long-term effects of Kawasaki Disease’ (NL41023.018.12) when they had fever and fulfilled additional clinical criteria compatible with KD as defined by the American Heart Association [17].

Clinical and cardiac follow up of patients was performed at the pediatric cardiac outpatient clinic at the Amsterdam Medical University Center, Willem-Alexander Children’s Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center or Sophia Children’s Hospital, Erasmus MC by one of the pediatric cardiologists and pediatric immunologists within approximately eight weeks after admission. Cardiac imaging was performed by echocardiography and z values were derived from the provided data.

Clinical and laboratory information was provided by their regular clinician by online anonymous information sheets and processed in a combined database (Castor).

All patients were included in accordance with study protocol and with the European Statements for Good Clinical Practice, which includes the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1989. Informed consent and written approval were obtained from all parents and children older than 12 years of age. The Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) of the Amsterdam UMC provided ethical approval for the Kawasaki study with the reference number: 2012_155. For the COPP-study no ethical approval was deemed necessary by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of Leiden UMC.

Serum protein analysis

Cytokine levels and additional biomarkers in serum were measured with the Bio-Plex system and analyzed with the BioPlex Manager software version 6.2 (Bio-rad Laboratories, Hercules CA, USA). A total of 105 unique serum proteins were measured (S1 File) of which 89 serum proteins were above the detectable range and available for analysis. Some serum proteins were measured more than once. If this was the case, measurement with the best technical performance (the least ‘out of range’ measurements) was used for analysis. Samples taken in the acute phase of the illness were tested in six MIS-C patients and four KD patients. All samples were taken prior to treatment, except for one who had already received intravenous immunoglobulin treatment. Follow-up samples (ranging from 2-9 weeks after presentation) were available from five MIS-C patients and five KD patients. Samples of thirteen healthy adults were available as pre-pandemic laboratory controls.

In vitro T-cell stimulation assay and flow cytometric analyses

For more detailed methods we refer to previous reports [18] and S1 File. In short, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of six MIS-C patients and four KD patients were incubated with SARS-CoV-2 peptide pools at 37°C (5% CO2). PBMCs were derived from samples taken at median 10 days (range 5-15 days) after disease onset in the MIS-C patients, and at median 42 days (range 8-63 days) for the KD patients. Activation with soluble αCD3 (Thermofisher, clone HIT3A) was used as a positive control and unstimulated cells (no addition of peptides) where used as negative control. Flow cytometric analyses of the PBMCs were performed with combinations of antibodies as described in the S1 File.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed in IBM SPSS Statistics 25. Non-parametric methods were used to compare groups because of a small sample size and a non-normal distribution (Mann-Whitney-U and Kruskal-Wallis tests). Correction for multiple testing was performed using the two-stage step-up method of Benjamini, Krieger and Yekutieli with a Q-value set at 1%. Agglomerative hierarchical clustering was performed using average linking (Between Groups) with squared Euclidean distance. Graphs were made in GraphPad Prism 8.4.2.

Results

A total of eight MIS-C patients and six KD patients were included in the period of March-June 2020.

Clinical and laboratory characteristics

The patients were admitted to ten different hospitals in the Netherlands. The median length of stay was nine days (range 5-12 days) for MIS-C patients and six days (range 5-19 days) for KD patients.

Patient characteristics are depicted in Table 1 (per patient in S1 Table). Remarkable, but not significantly different were the age (13 year, range 7-19 years in MIS-C patients, versus 5 years, range 2-16 years, in KD patients), incidence of shock (n=5/8, 63% versus n=2/6, 33%, respectively), and PICU admissions (n=7/8, 88% versus n=2/6, 33%, respectively). In total five MIS-C children displayed features of complete (3/8) or incomplete (2/8) KD (S1 Table).

Table 1. Patients Characteristics.

    All Patients
 Demographics    N (14) n/a KD (6) n/a MIS-Cc (8) n/a
Age   11 (2-19)   5 (2-16)   13 (7-19)  
BMI   18.2 (14.1-29.1) 1 17.3 (14.1-22.7)   22.4 (15.2-29.1) 1
Sex Female 57.1% (8)   50% (3)   62.5% (5)  
  Male 42.8% (6)   50% (3)   37.5% (3)  
Ethnicity Caucasian 57.1% (8)   83.3% (5)   37.5% (3)  
  Non-Caucasian 42.8% (6)   16.6% (1)   62.5% (5)  
Clinical presentation              
Shock   50% (7)   33.3% (2)   62.5% (5)  
Respiratory Distress   28.5% (4) 2 16.6% (1)   62,5% (5) 2
Fever > 5 days   85.7% (12)   83.3% (5)   87.5% (7)  
Rash   64.2% (9)   66.6% (4)   62.5% (5)  
Erythema of Palms/Soles   64.2% (9)   66.6% (4)   62.5% (5)  
Conjunctivitis   64.2% (9)   50% (3)   75% (6)  
Mucositis   57.1% (8)   66.6% (4)   50% (4)  
Lymphadenopathy   42.8% (6)   66.6% (4)   25% (2)  
gastro-intestinal symptoms   78.5% (11)   66.6% (4)   87.5% (7)  
Acute Kidney Injury   42.8% (6)   33.3% (2)   50% (4)  
Neurological Symptoms   7.14% (1)   0% (0)   12.5% (1)  
Complete Kawasaki diseaseb 57.1% (8) 66.6% (4) 37.5% (3)
Incomplete Kawasaki Diseaseb 28.5% (4) 33.3% (2) 25% (2)
Cardiac evaluation              
Abnormal LV Function   21.4% (3) 2 16.6% (1) 2 25% (2)  
Coronary Abnormalities   14.3% (2) 2 0 2 25% (2)  
Laboratory evaluation            
MASe   28,6% (4)   0   50% (4)  
ESR (mm/h)   38.5 (5-140) 6 43 (5-87) 1 34 (33-140) 5
CRP (mg/l)   230.5 (27-506)   59.5 (27-191)   370 (114-506)  
Hb (mmol/l)   12.2 (6.4-15.9) 2 12.2 (10.3-15.9)   12.0 (6,4-15,9) 2
Lymphocytes (x10e9/l)   0.935 (0.15-5.2)   0.95 (0.15-5.2)   0.935 (0.46-5)  
Neutrophils (x10e9/l)   9.095 (1.2-15.6)   6.8 (1.2-14.5)   11.15 (5.66-15.6)  
Platelets (x10e9/l)   200 (81-590)   222 (81-346)   165.5 (114-590)  
Albumin (g/l)   26 (17-44) 4 23.5 (17-44) 2 31 (21-39) 2
Ferritin (ug/L)   979 (79-4729) 1 104 (79-1278) 1 1103.5 (352-4729)  
ASAT (IU/L)   46 (21-156)   48 (29-156)   46 (21-151)  
Creatinine (umol/l)   52.5 (20-450)   44 (20-285)   118.5 (34-450)  
Treatment and outcome            
IVIG 2g/kg (max 80g)   57.1% (8)   33.3% (2)   75% (6)  
Steroids   42.8% (6)   16.6% (1)   62.5% (5)  
Antibiotics   71.4% (10)   50% (3)   87.5% (7)  
Oral Anticoagulation   35.7% (5)   33.3% (2)   37.5% (3)  
Low Weight Molecular Heparin   35,7 (5)   33,3% (2)   37,5% (3)  
Inotropes   57.1% (8)   33.3% (2)   75% (6)  
Admission Days   8 (5-19) 4 6 (5-19) 2 9 (5-12) 2
PICU Admission   64.2% (9)   33.3% (2)   87.5% (7)  
Death   0   0   0  

n/a missing data

± values are median and range

No significant differences were observed between groups

a. Shock defined as needing inotropic support or fluid rescuscitation >20 ml/kg

b. American Heart Association criteria for the definition of Kawasaki disease (KD) is to have persistent fever and 4 of the following 5 mucocutaneous features: erythema and cracking of lips, strawberry tongue, and/or erythema of oral and pharyngeal mucosa; bilateral bulbar conjunctival injection without exudate; rash (maculopapular, diffuse erythroderma); erythema and edema of the hands and feet in acute phase and/or periungual desquamation in subacute phase; and cervical lymphadenopathy (>1.5 cm diameter). Incomplete KD was defined by at least 2 clinical criteria compatible with KD and additional laboratory or cardiac criteria.

c. MIS-C according to criteria by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and World Health Organization (WHO)

d. Fever >38°C

e. Case definition for macrophage activation syndrome; fever; and ferritin>684 ng/ml, and 2 of the following criteria: platelets <181 x 109/L, AST >48 IU/L, triglycerides > 156 mg/dl or fibrinogen < 360 mg/dl

In two MIS-C cases, prominent coronary arteries (S1 Table, Z-score +2,7 and +4) and in two cases decreased myocardial function (EF < 50 or FS < 28) was observed, compared to one case of myocardial dysfunction in the KD group. Five out of the eight MIS-C cases had shock, which was classified as cardiogenic shock in two and distributive shock in three patients. Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) complicated MIS-C in four out of eight patients, whereas MAS was observed in none of the KD patients.

Two MIS-C children tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal aspirate or swabs. All MIS-C cases tested positive for total SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. All KD cases tested negative for total SARS-CoV-2 antibodies as well as RT-PCR.

In 5 out of 8 MIS-C patients, consecutive SARS-CoV-2 antibody samples were taken from admission up to 155 days after disease onset (S1 Fig). Overall antibody titers dropped in the seropositive patients (5/8) over time, total antibody levels were still detectable for all five patients and IgM only for one.

Clinical course after admission

A total of six out of eight MIS-C children were given intravenous immunoglobulin (2 g/kg) in the first 24-48 hrs after hospital admission (Table 1). In addition, five patients received high dose steroids. All received initial broad-spectrum therapeutic antibiotic coverage until cultures were negative. Subsequently, three children were given high dose aspirin and four children low-weight molecular heparin. In seven patients cardiac and clinical follow-up took place up to 155 days after discharge. In all cases the myocardial function normalized, and no residual cardiac damage or coronary abnormalities were observed using echocardiography (Table 1). Follow-up was further initiated as per protocol in KD in our centers with visits 6 and 12 months after discharge.

Cellular counts and responses to SARS-CoV-2. Total lymphocyte and neutrophil counts, CD3+CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell proportions, including frequencies of effector (CD45RA+CD27-) and naïve (CD45RA+CD27+) T-cell phenotypes and granzyme B (GMZB) detection in CD3+CD8+ (p=0.07) did not significantly differ between groups (Fig 1 and S2 Fig). GMZB detection in CD3+CD4+ T-cells was significantly higher in MIS-C compared to KD patients (p=0.02, S2 Fig).

Fig 1. CD3+ T-cell subsets and CD3+CD4+ T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

Fig 1

(A) C3+CD4+ and CD3+CD4+ T-cell frequencies depicted per patient, MIS-C classification, ICU stay and age. (B) CD4+/CD8+ ratios in MIS-C and KD patients (C) CD4+/CD8+ ratios in relation to ICU stay (D) Representative flow cytometry contour plots of CD3+CD4+ T-cells incubated with (SARS-CoV-2) and without (unstimulated) SARS-CoV-2 Spike peptide pool. Upon SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein stimulation CD3+CD4+ T-cells of MIS-C children were activated and expressed CD40L and IFN- γ (E) Representative flow cytometry contour plots demonstrating the phenotypic composition of CD4+ T cells of patient 4 (black plot), as measured by CD45RA and CD27 expression and GZMB and CD4+ T-cell when stimulated with SARS-CoV-2 Spike peptide pool (red plot). CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T-cell subsets are per patients illustrated in the S3 Fig Depicted plots of PBMCs (D and E) belong to patient 4. Abbreviations: GZMB = Granzyme B.

To identify whether the KD patients were responding to SARS-CoV-2, PBMCs of KD and MIS-C patients were stimulated with a SARS-CoV-2 S-peptide pool (S1 File). The S-protein was recognized by CD3+CD4+ T cells in all children within the MIS-C group and responded, which contrasted with the total lack of such responses in the seronegative KD group (n=4). The median percentage of SARS-CoV-2 S-peptide-pool-reactive CD4 T-cells was 0.031% (range 0.016-0.038%, exemplified in Fig 1, panel D). Stimulated cells displayed IFN- γ (Fig 1, panel D and E).

Cytokine profiles

59 of 81 tested serum proteins were significantly increased in the acute phase in children with MIS-C or KD as compared to healthy controls (Fig 2, S3 Fig, S2 Table). Most (53 of 81) serum protein levels were higher on average in the acute phase of illness in children with MIS-C (n=8) than in children with KD (n=4), but this was not statistically significant after correction for multiple testing. At follow-up (between 2 and 9 weeks after presentation), serum levels of inflammatory proteins had decreased but had not completely normalized, both in patients with MIS-C (n=6) and KD (n=5).

Fig 2. Serum cytokine profiles in MIS-C and Kawasaki Disease patients.

Fig 2

Levels of serum proteins in healthy controls (HC), MIS-C and KD children, in the acute phase of the illness (AP) and at follow-up (FU). Left panel: Agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis using average linkage (between groups), with squared Euclidean distance. Right panel: Violin plots IFN- γ related cytokines across study groups).

Discussion

In this case series from the Netherlands, we describe the clinical characteristics and inflammatory markers of children that presented with MIS-C and KD in the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We observed different clinical presentations within the MIS-C group consistent with the clinical heterogeneity of MIS-C patients described previously [19]. In a CDC report of 570 patients in the USA several subgroups of MIS-C patients were identified [19]. One group of patients had high degree of organ involvement and high prevalence of shock, and another group of patients more commonly met the criteria for complete KD and had higher prevalence of coronary artery aneurysms and dilatation and lowest prevalence of complications such as shock and temporary cardiac dysfunction [19]. SARS-CoV-2 seems to trigger both of these phenotypes. In our cohort, we observed a decrease in SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibodies over time and a Spike protein-specific CD3+CD4+ T cell response in both groups of MIS-C patients.

Given the overlapping feature of MIS-C with KD and KDSS, an important question remains to what extent the pathophysiology of KD/KDSS and MIS-C share commonalities. In both MIS-C and KD patients, we observed a very high presence of many pro-inflammatory serum cytokines such as IL-6, sTNFR1&2 and the IFN-γ induced chemokines CXCL 9, 10 and 11. Even so, stimulation of CD3+CD4+ T cells of MIS-C patients with SARS-CoV-2 S-peptide pools led to activation and production of IFN- γ. Also in other cohorts of MIS-C patients increased cytokine levels were observed [20, 21] , and more specific dysregulation of the IFN-γ pathway [22, 23]. IL-6 and CXCL10 levels were more increased in KD patients compared to MIS-C patients in a paper of Consiglio et al [24]. Likewise, IL-6 and IFN- γ are putative biomarkers in children with KDSS [25] and children with both MIS-C and KDSS have been successfully treated with IL-1 (anakinra) and IL-6 (tocilizumab) receptor antagonists [12, 14, 26–28]. The remarkable overlap in clinical and laboratory features between KDSS and MIS-C is intriguing [29–37]. Larger cohort studies are needed to understand which inflammatory cascades are involved in both diseases.

All MIS-C children in our cohort recovered with a good response to treatment with IVIG alone or in combination with steroids, although several MIS-C patients have been reported to require biologicals [12, 38]. We did not observe cardiac sequelae in the MIS-C patients at the follow-up visits 2-3 months after the disease episode. Nevertheless, further imaging with late enhancement MRI is needed to accurately detect the presence of residual cardiac damage [39].

Only several small studies have compared immune signatures in both diseases, and this study adds to this comparison by its prospective and coinciding recruitment of both patient groups that allowed for similar clinical and laboratory data assembly. Another strength of this study is the longitudinal follow-up of children into the convalescence phase. There are also several limitations to our study, most importantly the limited sample size that might have influenced our ability to detect significant differences between groups. Similarly, patients within the groups were clinically heterogeneous and in combination with the small sample sizes, subgroup analyses could not be performed. There is a need for larger cohort studies and more in-depth immune analyses to better understand the etiology of SARS-CoV-2 associated inflammatory syndromes compared to other auto-inflammatory syndromes.

In conclusion, our study shows marked hyper-inflammation with high levels of drug-targetable cytokines in both MIS-C and KD patients. Although we did not observe significant differences between groups, these finding can potentially guide optimal treatment interventions in the future in children with both these diseases.

Supporting information

S1 File. Supplemental methods.

(PDF)

S1 Table. Patients characteristics.

(PDF)

S2 Table. Serum proteins levels, 2Log fold expression compared to healthy controls.

(PDF)

S1 Data. Immune cell phenotyping data.

(XLSX)

S2 Data. Serum proteins levels data.

(XLSX)

S3 Data. SARS-CoV-2 titers data.

(XLSX)

S1 Fig. SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses over time in children with MIS-C.

(A) Total (IgA, IgM, IgG) and IgM Spike-protein specific antibody titers measured in serum and calculated in OD/CO ratios over time in 5 MIS-C patients. (B) Total antibody titers in the MIS-C patients in relation to the time serum was obtained after admission. Antibodies were considered positive if the OD/CO ratio was > 1. Abbreviations: OD = optical density; the read out value of the antibody assay signal, CO = cut off; the threshold value for an antibody signal to be ‘positive’.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. CD3+ T-cell subsets per patients and groups.

(A) C3+CD4+ subset T-cell counts depicted per patient, MIS-C, ICU stay and age. (B) C3+CD8+ subset T-cell counts depicted per patient, MIS-C, ICU stay and age. (C) CD3+CD8+ effector T-cell percentages in MIS-C (+) and KD patients (-). (D) CD3+CD8+ effector T-cell percentages depicted for patients that stayed at the ICU (+) or not (-). (E) CD3+CD4+ effector T-cell percentages in MIS-C (+) and KD patients (-). (F) CD3+CD4+ effector T-cell percentages depicted for patients that stayed at the ICU (+) or not (-). (G) percentage of CD3+CD8+ GZMB positive T-cells (cytotoxic T-cells) in MIS-C (+) and KD patients (-). (H) Percentage of CD3+CD4+ GZMB positive T-cells in MIS-C (+) and KDe patients (-). (I) Total lymphocytes counts in MIS-C (+) and KD patients (-). (J) Total neutrophil counts in MIS-C (+) and KD patients (-). Abbreviations: Te = effector T-cells, Tem = effector memory T-cells, Tcm = central memory T-cells, Tn = naïve T-cells, GZMB = Granzyme B.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Violin plots of serum cytokines across study groups.

Violin plots of the highest log fold increased serum cytokines compared to healthy controls, and all represented in the lowest hierarchical cluster in Fig 2.

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank all children and parents that participated in this study. Furthermore, we gratefully acknowledge all study and laboratory staff and collaborating institutes for their dedication to this project. We acknowledge the help of S. van Veen and P. Ruibal at the Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, in determining cytokine profiles.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The “Clinical features of COVID-19 in Pediatric Patients” (COPP)-study is funded by the #wakeuptocorona crowdfund initiative of the Bontius Stichting and the Leiden University Fund. Receiver of the grant EB The Kawasaki study is funded by the Dutch Foundation Kind & Handicap (The Hague, The Netherlands) and an anonymous donor through the AMC foundation. Reciever of the grant is TK. The sponsors had no role in the study design, the data collection and analysis, the writing of the report, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

References

  • 1.Lu X, Zhang L, Du H, Zhang J, Li YY, Qu J, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Children. The New England journal of medicine. 2020;382(17):1663–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2005073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dong Y, Mo X, Hu Y, Qi X, Jiang F, Jiang Z, et al. Epidemiology of COVID-19 Among Children in China. Pediatrics. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Qiu H, Wu J, Hong L, Luo Y, Song Q, Chen D. Clinical and epidemiological features of 36 children with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Zhejiang, China: an observational cohort study. The Lancet Infectious diseases. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Verdoni L, Mazza A, Gervasoni A, Martelli L, Ruggeri M, Ciuffreda M, et al. An outbreak of severe Kawasaki-like disease at the Italian epicentre of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic: an observational cohort study. Lancet (London, England). 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Toubiana J, Poirault C, Corsia A, Bajolle F, Fourgeaud J, Angoulvant F, et al. Kawasaki-like multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children during the covid-19 pandemic in Paris, France: prospective observational study. Bmj. 2020;369:m2094. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Whittaker E, Bamford A, Kenny J, Kaforou M, Jones CE, Shah P, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 58 Children With a Pediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome Temporally Associated With SARS-CoV-2. JAMA. 2020. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.10369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Feldstein LR, Rose EB, Horwitz SM, Collins JP, Newhams MM, Son MBF, et al. Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in U.S. Children and Adolescents. The New England journal of medicine. 2020. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dufort EM, Koumans EH, Chow EJ, Rosenthal EM, Muse A, Rowlands J, et al. Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children in New York State. The New England journal of medicine. 2020. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Riphagen S, Gomez X, Gonzalez-Martinez C, Wilkinson N, Theocharis P. Hyperinflammatory shock in children during COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet (London, England). 2020. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31094-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.WorldHealthOrganisation. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children and adolescents with COVID-19. Scientific brief. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Network CHA. Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) Associated with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jiang L, Tang K, Levin M, Irfan O, Morris SK, Wilson K, et al. COVID-19 and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children and adolescents. The Lancet Infectious diseases. 2020;20(11):e276–e88. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30651-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ahmed M, Advani S, Moreira A, Zoretic S, Martinez J, Chorath K, et al. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children: A systematic review. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;26:100527. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cohen S, Tacke CE, Straver B, Meijer N, Kuipers IM, Kuijpers TW. A child with severe relapsing Kawasaki disease rescued by IL-1 receptor blockade and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2012;71(12):2059–61. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hoang LT, Shimizu C, Ling L, Naim AN, Khor CC, Tremoulet AH, et al. Global gene expression profiling identifies new therapeutic targets in acute Kawasaki disease. Genome Med. 2014;6(11):541. doi: 10.1186/s13073-014-0102-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Alphonse MP, Duong TT, Shumitzu C, Hoang TL, McCrindle BW, Franco A, et al. Inositol-Triphosphate 3-Kinase C Mediates Inflammasome Activation and Treatment Response in Kawasaki Disease. J Immunol. 2016;197(9):3481–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Newburger JW, Takahashi M, Gerber MA, Gewitz MH, Tani LY, Burns JC, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management of Kawasaki disease: a statement for health professionals from the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, American Heart Association. Circulation. 2004;110(17):2747–71. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000145143.19711.78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Oja AE, Saris A, Ghandour CA, Kragten NAM, Hogema BM, Nossent EJ, et al. Divergent SARS-CoV-2-specific T and B cell responses in severe but not mild COVID-19 patients. Eur J Immunol. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Godfred-Cato S, Bryant B, Leung J, Oster ME, Conklin L, Abrams J, et al. COVID-19-Associated Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children - United States, March-July 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(32):1074–80. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6932e2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gruber CN, Patel RS, Trachtman R, Lepow L, Amanat F, Krammer F, et al. Mapping Systemic Inflammation and Antibody Responses in Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C). Cell. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Carter MJ, Fish M, Jennings A, Doores KJ, Wellman P, Seow J, et al. Peripheral immunophenotypes in children with multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nature medicine. 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1054-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Diorio C, Shraim R, Vella LA, Giles JR, Baxter AE, Oldridge DA, et al. Proteomic profiling of MIS-C patients indicates heterogeneity relating to interferon gamma dysregulation and vascular endothelial dysfunction. Nature Communications. 2021;12(1):7222. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27544-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Esteve-Sole A, Anton J, Pino-Ramirez RM, Sanchez-Manubens J, Fumadó V, Fortuny C, et al. Similarities and differences between the immunopathogenesis of COVID-19-related pediatric multisystem inflammatory syndrome and Kawasaki disease. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(6). doi: 10.1172/JCI144554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Consiglio CR, Cotugno N, Sardh F, Pou C, Amodio D, Rodriguez L, et al. The Immunology of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children with COVID-19. Cell. 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li Y, Zheng Q, Zou L, Wu J, Guo L, Teng L, et al. Kawasaki disease shock syndrome: clinical characteristics and possible use of IL-6, IL-10 and IFN-γ as biomarkers for early recognition. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2019;17(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12969-018-0303-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kone-Paut I, Cimaz R, Herberg J, Bates O, Carbasse A, Saulnier JP, et al. The use of interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (anakinra) in Kawasaki disease: A retrospective cases series. Autoimmunity reviews. 2018;17(8):768–74. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2018.01.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lind-Holst M, Hartling UB, Christensen AE. High-dose anakinra as treatment for macrophage activation syndrome caused by refractory Kawasaki disease in an infant. BMJ case reports. 2019;12(8). doi: 10.1136/bcr-2019-229708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Soni PR, Noval Rivas M, Arditi M. A Comprehensive Update on Kawasaki Disease Vasculitis and Myocarditis. Current rheumatology reports. 2020;22(2):6. doi: 10.1007/s11926-020-0882-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dominguez SR, Friedman K, Seewald R, Anderson MS, Willis L, Glodé MP. Kawasaki disease in a pediatric intensive care unit: a case-control study. Pediatrics. 2008;122(4):e786–90. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kanegaye JT, Wilder MS, Molkara D, Frazer JR, Pancheri J, Tremoulet AH, et al. Recognition of a Kawasaki disease shock syndrome. Pediatrics. 2009;123(5):e783–9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lin MT, Fu CM, Huang SK, Huang SC, Wu MH. Population-based study of Kawasaki disease shock syndrome in Taiwan. The Pediatric infectious disease journal. 2013;32(12):1384–6. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31829efae6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gámez-González LB, Murata C, Muñoz-Ramírez M, Yamazaki-Nakashimada M. Clinical manifestations associated with Kawasaki disease shock syndrome in Mexican children. Eur J Pediatr. 2013;172(3):337–42. doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1879-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chen PS, Chi H, Huang FY, Peng CC, Chen MR, Chiu NC. Clinical manifestations of Kawasaki disease shock syndrome: a case-control study. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2015;48(1):43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2013.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gamez-Gonzalez LB, Moribe-Quintero I, Cisneros-Castolo M, Varela-Ortiz J, Muñoz-Ramírez M, Garrido-García M, et al. Kawasaki disease shock syndrome: Unique and severe subtype of Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Int. 2018;60(9):781–90. doi: 10.1111/ped.13614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Qiu H, Li C, He Y, Weng F, Shi H, Pan L, et al. Association between left ventricular ejection fraction and Kawasaki disease shock syndrome. Cardiology in the young. 2019;29(2):178–84. doi: 10.1017/S1047951118002056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Taddio A, Rossi ED, Monasta L, Pastore S, Tommasini A, Lepore L, et al. Describing Kawasaki shock syndrome: results from a retrospective study and literature review. Clin Rheumatol. 2017;36(1):223–8. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3316-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Schuster JE, Palac HL, Innocentini N, Rowley AH, Young LT, Shulman ST. Hyponatremia Is a Feature of Kawasaki Disease Shock Syndrome: A Case-Control Study. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2017;6(4):386–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Belhadjer Z, Méot M, Bajolle F, Khraiche D, Legendre A, Abakka S, et al. Acute heart failure in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) in the context of global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Circulation. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Valverde I, Singh Y, Sanchez-de-Toledo J, Theocharis P, Chikermane A, Di Filippo S, et al. Acute Cardiovascular Manifestations in 286 Children With Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome Associated With COVID-19 Infection in Europe. Circulation. 2021;143(1):21–32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Tariq Jamal Siddiqi

1 Dec 2021

PONE-D-21-31674Inflammatory responses in SARS-CoV-2 associated Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome and Kawasaki Disease in children: an observational studyPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Biesbroek,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 15 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Tariq Jamal Siddiqi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

3. Please amend the manuscript submission data (via Edit Submission) to include authors  D. Schonenberg, M. Boele van Hensbroek, H.J. Scherpbier, A.M. Tutu-van Furth.

4. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well. 

5. We note that Figure Additional File 3 in your submission contain copyrighted images. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure Additional File 3 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission. 

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

Additional Editor Comments:

Biesbroek et al. conducted an observational study on,” Inflammatory responses in SARS-CoV-2 associated Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome and Kawasaki Disease in children”, in which they report that Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome and Kawasaki Disease patients both displayed cytokine-associated hyper-inflammation with several high levels of drug-targetable cytokines. In my opinion this study can be improved by incorporating the following points:

1. The discussion can be improved further by discussing more about

2. When mentioning about “granzyme B (GMZB) detection did not significantly differ between groups”, the author should also state a p-value.

3. The strengths of the study need to be addressed along with how this study adds to the medical literature.

4. It can be mentioned how study focuses on a population that was not highlighted by previous authors, or whether this study demonstrates new results and how your study is superior to previous and other such studies.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Nov 30;17(11):e0266336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266336.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


9 Feb 2022

10-1-2021

Dear editor,

We thank you for your considerations and the opportunity to revise our manuscript entitled ” Inflammatory responses in SARS-CoV-2 associated Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome and Kawasaki Disease in Children; an observational study” by G. Biesbroek et al.

Herewith we would like to submit our revised manuscript and answer to the editorial comments. You’ll find our reply underneath, discussed per point raised by the academic editor. We thank the editor for the valuable comments. The suggested edits have certainly contributed to the quality of our manuscript.

Specific editorial comments

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

We have adjusted the manuscript accordingly.

2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

The funders are enlisted in the funding information section. The Kawasaki study is funded by the Dutch Foundation Kind & Handicap (The Hague, The Netherlands) and an anonymous donor through the AMC foundation. Similarly, The “Clinical features of COVID-19 in Pediatric Patients” (COPP)-study is funded by the #wakeuptocorona crowdfund initiative of the Bontius Stichting and the Leiden University Fund. These are all non-profit organisations or sponsors.

3. Please amend the manuscript submission data (via Edit Submission) to include authors D. Schonenberg, M. Boele van Hensbroek, H.J. Scherpbier, A.M. Tutu-van Furth.

We have adjusted the author section.

4. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well.

We have adjusted the methods section accordingly.

5. We note that Figure Additional File 3 in your submission contain copyrighted images. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission.

We have obtained permission of the patients that the pictures can be published and can be freely accessed online. After a reminder last week we are waiting for the written permissions to be returned to us. If possible, we would like to send them as soon as possible to you upon arrival. If this is not possible, we are in agreement to remove the figure from the online materials. One patient was not in agreement and we removed the X-ray of her lungs already from the figure.

Additional Editor Comments:

2. When mentioning about “granzyme B (GMZB) detection did not significantly differ between groups”, the author should also state a p-value.

We added the p-value for GMZB detection in the manuscript. We didn’t test significance in the CD4+ T-cell population separately, but this appeared unexpectedly to be significantly different between groups and have been added to the manuscript.

3. The strengths of the study need to be addressed along with how this study adds to the medical literature.

The strengths of this study are the coinciding prospective recruitment of both MIS-C and KD patients and the longitudinal follow-up of children into the convalescence phase. These strengths have been added. To date, there are only a limited number of studies that compare immune signatures between MIS-C and KD and this study therefore also adds to our collective understanding of the similarities and distinct features of these two diseases.

4. It can be mentioned how study focuses on a population that was not highlighted by previous authors, or whether this study demonstrates new results and how your study is superior to previous and other such studies

The strength of this study is the prospective recruitment of patients in both disease groups which allowed for direct comparison between groups with identical study procedures and clinical comparison. Most of the performed studies have used historical Kawasaki Disease patient cohorts that might have introduced differences in clinical data assembly and stored materials. This aspect has been highlighted in the manuscript accordingly.

We thank the editor for the opportunity to revise our manuscript and have sufficiently answered all editorial comments.

Sincerely yours,

Giske Biesbroek, on behalf of the authors

Decision Letter 1

Tariq Jamal Siddiqi

21 Mar 2022

Inflammatory responses in SARS-CoV-2 associated Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome and Kawasaki Disease in children: an observational study

PONE-D-21-31674R1

Dear Dr. Biesbroek,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Tariq Jamal Siddiqi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Acceptance letter

Tariq Jamal Siddiqi

12 Apr 2022

PONE-D-21-31674R1

Inflammatory responses in SARS-CoV-2 associated Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome and Kawasaki Disease in children: an observational study

Dear Dr. Biesbroek:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Tariq Jamal Siddiqi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Supplemental methods.

    (PDF)

    S1 Table. Patients characteristics.

    (PDF)

    S2 Table. Serum proteins levels, 2Log fold expression compared to healthy controls.

    (PDF)

    S1 Data. Immune cell phenotyping data.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Data. Serum proteins levels data.

    (XLSX)

    S3 Data. SARS-CoV-2 titers data.

    (XLSX)

    S1 Fig. SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses over time in children with MIS-C.

    (A) Total (IgA, IgM, IgG) and IgM Spike-protein specific antibody titers measured in serum and calculated in OD/CO ratios over time in 5 MIS-C patients. (B) Total antibody titers in the MIS-C patients in relation to the time serum was obtained after admission. Antibodies were considered positive if the OD/CO ratio was > 1. Abbreviations: OD = optical density; the read out value of the antibody assay signal, CO = cut off; the threshold value for an antibody signal to be ‘positive’.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. CD3+ T-cell subsets per patients and groups.

    (A) C3+CD4+ subset T-cell counts depicted per patient, MIS-C, ICU stay and age. (B) C3+CD8+ subset T-cell counts depicted per patient, MIS-C, ICU stay and age. (C) CD3+CD8+ effector T-cell percentages in MIS-C (+) and KD patients (-). (D) CD3+CD8+ effector T-cell percentages depicted for patients that stayed at the ICU (+) or not (-). (E) CD3+CD4+ effector T-cell percentages in MIS-C (+) and KD patients (-). (F) CD3+CD4+ effector T-cell percentages depicted for patients that stayed at the ICU (+) or not (-). (G) percentage of CD3+CD8+ GZMB positive T-cells (cytotoxic T-cells) in MIS-C (+) and KD patients (-). (H) Percentage of CD3+CD4+ GZMB positive T-cells in MIS-C (+) and KDe patients (-). (I) Total lymphocytes counts in MIS-C (+) and KD patients (-). (J) Total neutrophil counts in MIS-C (+) and KD patients (-). Abbreviations: Te = effector T-cells, Tem = effector memory T-cells, Tcm = central memory T-cells, Tn = naïve T-cells, GZMB = Granzyme B.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Violin plots of serum cytokines across study groups.

    Violin plots of the highest log fold increased serum cytokines compared to healthy controls, and all represented in the lowest hierarchical cluster in Fig 2.

    (TIF)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES